Characterization of Instrumental Phase Stability on the SMA Interferometer D. Y. Kubo a, T. R....

1
Characterization of Instrumental Phase Stability on the SMA Interferometer D. Y. Kubo a , T. R. Hunter b , R. D. Christensen c , P. I. Yamaguchi c a Academia Sinica, Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, Hilo, HI b Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA c Smithsonian Submillimeter Array, Hilo, HI Abstract Atmospheric water vapor causes significant undesired phase fluctuations for the SMA interferometer, particularly in its highest frequency observing band of 690 GHz. One proposed solution to this atmospheric effect is to observe simultaneously at two separate frequency bands of 230 and 690 GHz. Although the phase fluctuations have a smaller magnitude at the lower frequency, they can be measured more accurately and on shorter timescales due to the greater sensitivity of the array to celestial point source calibrators at this frequency. In theory, we can measure the atmospheric phase fluctuations in the 230 GHz band, scale them appropriately with frequency, and apply them to the data in 690 band during the post-observation calibration process. The ultimate limit to this atmospheric phase calibration scheme will be set by the instrumental phase stability of the IF and LO systems. We describe the methodology and initial results of the phase stability characterization of the IF and LO systems. M IRRO R 1 2 3 4 5 6 PO LARIZATIO N S P LITTE R SIS ISO LATO R / SIS BIAS HEMT 1ST STAG E (65K) 3RD STAG E (4K) 2ND STAG E (14K) RECEIVER SET A (4 IN S ER TS,1 SHOW N) RECEIVER SET B (4 IN SER TS ,N O N E SHOW N) xN GUNN OSC. xM fwd F(s) fine tune Fo F I NA L L O ( SK Y + /- 5 G H z ) course tune servo CRYOSTAT LO CATED O N O PTICS CAG E IF-1 O U T (5 G H z) ~109 M Hz REFERENCE -30 dBm YIG -1 OSC. fwd F(s) fine tune Fin -Fo = 200 M Hz course tune FORx FORx FO Tx 1550 nm 1310 nm DIPLEXER 200 M Hz REFERENCE 200 M Hz 109 M Hz AN TEN N A IF/LO Box +5 dBm (nom ) +20 dBm (m ax) FO Tx 10 M Hz PLL 100 M Hz FO Tx 1550 nm W DM FORx 1310 nm . . . 6-W AY PD 4-W AY PD . . . SAM PLER 2-B ITS x4 208 M Hz LENS 2ND STAG E AM P ISO LATO R 2ND STAG E AM P W DM 6.2 to 8.3 G H z LO 52 M H z C LO CK 6 BLO CKS Fc = 1 G Hz (328 M Hz EACH) 4 CHUNKS /BLO CK Fc = 153 M Hz (82 M Hz EACH) 2ND LO SYNTH. 724 M Hz 806 1276 1194 TO TAL O F 6 X 4 = 24 CHUNKS PER R EC EIVER IF 1ST LO SYNTH. 3180 M Hz 3508 3836 6164 6492 6820 (flat) (flat) (oval) (oval) TO CORRELATOR ~109/200 M Hz IF ANTENNA CO NTRO L BLDG -7 dBm (nom ) +4 dBm (nom ) 1310 nm +2 dBm nom +11 dBm (nom ) O PTIC AL SPLITTER 10-W AY PD AN T-1 P D TO R C VR -B YIG -2 (H AR D W ARE SHO WN O NLY FO R RCVR-A) -3 dBm (-10.5 dB) +4 dBm (nom ) 1310 nm (-0.5 dB) 1310 nm ORTEL ORTEL ORTEL (-0.5 dB) -5 dBm (nom ) 1550 nm LASERTRON NOTES: ho r n harmonic mixer fixed m ultiplier fw d = LO rvrs = {F gunn -(M x LO )}= ~109 M Hz 109 M Hz error DC error Am bientLoad C alibration 1stD O W N CONVERTER LO ~109 M Hz 5+/-1.25 GHz BPF ISO LATO R 5+/-1.25 GHz BPF D irectD igital Synthesizer 4-W y PD 4-W y Sw D igitalPLL Assy DC error G UNN PLL & M U LTIPLIER ASSY (1 PER RECEIVER INSERT R EQ U IR ED ) TO O THER G UNN PLL & M U LTIPLIER ASSY'S TO O THER G UNN PLL & M U LTIPLIER ASSY'S FIBER -C FIBER -A AN T-8 CSO JCM T . . . DEMUX 8-B ITS SE TO D IFF 16-B ITS D IFFER EN TIAL E C L /C H U N K 2nd D O WN CONVERTER 52 M Hz C H U N KS 1-4 C H U N KS 4-8 C H U N KS 9-12 C H U N KS 13-16 C H U N KS 17-20 C H U N KS 21-24 1 2 6 . . . FAN OUT GPS R eference x10 & 100 M Hz PLL x2 x10 DDS (~9 + 100 (M Hz) 52 M Hz PLS SUM x6,7 or8 M U LTIPLIER 52 MHz (1 PER ANTENNA IF R EQ U IR ED ) M RG YIG -1 PLL H P 8644B fwd F(s) fine tune 0.2 to 500 M Hz coarse tune 6,7,or8 G Hz 5.5 to 8.5 G Hz VARIABLE ATTENUATO R IS SERVO ED O NLY O NCE AT BEG IN NIN G O F TRACK TO O PTIM IZE LO D R IVE TO YIG O SC ILLATO R . VARIABLE ATTENUATO R IS SERVO ED O NLY O NCE TO O PTIM IZE IF D R IVE TO FIBER O PTIC TRANSM ITTER (FO Tx). VARIABLE ATTENUATO R IS SERVO ED O NLY O NCE TO O PTIM IZE LO D R IVE TO YIG O SC ILLATO R . VARIABLE ATTENUATO R IS SERVO ED O NLY O NCE TO O PTIM IZE YIG LO D R IVE TO G UNN PLL. VARIABLE ATTENUATO R IS SERVO ED O NLY O NCE TO O PTIM IZE IF D R IVE TO M IXERS. VARIABLE ATTENUATO R ARE SERVO ED CO NSTANTLY TO O PTIM IZE D R IVE TO SAM PLERS. SECO NDARY PHASE RO TATO RS REM O VE RESIDUAL FREQ UENCY O FFSETS FO R FR IN G E STO PPIN G . 2 1 4 3 5 7 6 Fig 1 Sm ithsonian Subm illim eterA rray RF System Block D iagram IF-2 O U T (5 G H z) -30 dBm TO RCVR-B SYSTEM (NO T SHO W N) SUM from MRG YIG -2 PLL ListofAcronym s: BPF = Band Pass Filter FO R x = FiberO ptic R eceiver FO Tx = FiberO ptic Transm itter M RG = M asterR eference G enerator NO M = N om inal PD = Pow erD ivider PLL = Phase Lock Loop W DM = W ave D ivision M ultiplexer LO-1 LO-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Introduction The Submillimeter Array (SMA) is a collaborative project of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics (ASIAA) of Taiwan. The array consists of eight six-meter diameter antennas with receivers operating from 180 to 700 GHz and a digital correlator with 2 GHz of bandwidth. Located on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, the primary elements of the SMA interferometer can be reconfigured across 24 pads which provide baselines ranging from 8 to 500 meters. Each antenna cryostat assembly houses up to 8 receiver inserts consisting of low-noise superconducting (SIS) mixers. The inserts can be used in pairs for increased bandwidth and for polarimetry observations. Local oscillators (LOs) are used in each antenna to provide heterodyne mixing from the sky frequency to the 5 GHz intermediate frequency (IF). A system block diagram for the IF/LO system is provided in Fig 1 . Photos are provided in Fig 2 . Instrumental phase stability measurements are discussed herein. 1. IF Functional Description and Impact on Phase Stability The IF path which carries the 4 to 6 GHz signal begins within the antenna cryostat just after the SIS mixer (lower left of Fig 1 ). This signal is leveled then optically modulated for transmission over fiber to the main control building. The received optical signal is demodulated to electrical, leveled to accommodate for optical loss variations, then passes through the 1 st down conversion which subdivides the IF signal into six blocks. A 2 nd down conversion further subdivides the IF into 24 chunks each centered at 153 MHz and with a bandwidth of 82 MHz (total bandwidth of 1968 MHz). Each of these 24 chunks are fine leveled to accommodate for channel slope and sky variations then digitized using 2-bit samplers operating at 208 Msps (upper right of Fig 1 ). Phase movements or drifts of the IF signal do not scale with LO frequency. I.e., a 1 degree drift of the IF-1 signal relative to the IF-2 signal appears as a 1 degree offset between the 230 GHz and 690 GHz signal. We have shown that the IF drift is much less than 1 degree and is therefore negligible. 2. LO Functional Description and Impact on Phase Stability The LO system begins with a 10 MHz crystal oscillator phase locked to a GPS reference. A set of ~109 MHz and 200 MHz references are generated then optically modulated for transmission over fiber to the antenna. A common tunable LO (5.5 – 8.5 GHz) denoted as MRG YIG-1 PLL in the lower right of Fig 1 is optically modulated and power divided to each of the 8 antennas. Each antenna receives these LOs on fibers A and C and are demodulated to electrical then leveled to accommodate for optical loss variations. The antenna YIG-1 PLL phase locks to the 200 MHz and LO-1 to produce an output at either LO-1 +/- 200 MHz. Following the YIG-1 output is a harmonic mixer which produces multiple harmonics (M) and mixes them with the Gunn oscillator output operating in the 80 to 120 GHz band. The Gunn output is followed by a final fixed multiplier whose value is denoted as N. Table 1 provides example LO frequencies for some typical tuning frequencies. It becomes obvious from the table that a small movement in the antenna YIG phase translates to a non-trivial phase movement at the final LO. For example, a 1.0 degree phase movement at the antenna YIG output translates to 32, 48, and 84 degrees at the final LO for 230, 345, and 690 GHz, respectively, which is clearly too large because it will correspond to significant errors in the position measurement of astronomical sources and to a reduction of the image fidelity. Table 1. Exam ple LO frequenciesfor230, 345, and 690 G H z. M R G Y IG Antenna Y IG M G unn N FinalLO M*N 6.825 G H z 7.025 G H z 16 112.509 G H z 2 225.018 G H z 32 6.877 G H z 7.077 G H z 16 113.341 G H z 3 340.023 G H z 48 7.947 G H z 8.147 G H z 14 114.167 G H z 6 685.002 G H z 84 3. Experimental Tests – Stability of Antenna YIG oscillator The long term phase stability of the antenna YIG-1 LO was monitored by sending the signal back to the control building using the IF-2 channel (not shown in the figure). This returned antenna YIG-1 LO was mixed with the MRG YIG-1 LO to produce a difference frequency of 200 MHz, which in turn was phase compared to the MRG 200 MHz system reference using an HP 8508A vector voltmeter. The data shown in Fig 3 were taken during an actual science track at 1 sample/second and was window averaged over 60 seconds to remove fast phase variations. These data reveals a high level of stability of 0.10 degrees peak-to-peak and 0.025 degrees RMS over the first six hours. It is significant to note that there is little or no correlation of the phase to the azimuth position which implies that the azimuth fiber tension assembly is functioning as designed. Translated to the final LO frequency of 225 GHz the phase number becomes 3.2 and 0.8 degrees peak-to-peak and RMS, respectively. Assuming a similar stability for the antenna YIG-2 LO this number translated to 685 GHz becomes 8.4 and 2.1 degrees peak-to-peak and RMS, respectively. 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 E lapsed m inutes since 11:57:53 P M H S T, A pril 16, 2006 A ntenna-4 Y IG -1 round trip phase, degrees -140 -80 -20 40 100 160 220 280 340 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 E lapsed m inutes since 11:57:53 P M H S T, A pril 16, 2006 A ntenna-4 A Z position, degrees Fig 3 Antenna 4 YIG-1 round trip phase stability data (left) and corresponding azimuth position (right). YIG tuning was changed at ~390 minutes. Peak phase drift seen over 6 hours was just over 0.10 degrees. RMS value over this same interval was 0.025 degrees. 4. Experimental Tests – Stability between MRG YIG-1 and MRG YIG-2 10.2 10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 11.0 11.1 11.2 0 15 30 45 60 Tim e,seconds since ~8:10AM ,April 22,2006 M RG 2 -M RG 1 phase,degrees Since the antenna YIG-1 and YIG-2 LOs are locked to MRG LO-1 and LO-2 located in the control building, it is necessary to characterize the phase stability between these MRG LOs. This was accomplished by locking MRG LO-1 to 7.000 GHz and LO- 2 to 7.200 GHz and mixing the two to produce a difference of 200 MHz. This 200 MHz difference was then phase compared to the MRG 200 MHz system reference. Fig 4 shows the phase stability plot over a limit period of only one hour. This test was conducted in the morning after a science track and was affected by the air conditioning compressor turning on at approximately 45 minutes. Nevertheless a variation 0.30 degrees peak-to-peak and 0.058 degrees RMS was seen during the first 45 minutes. Assuming that each MRG YIG is drifting by equal amounts we assign an RMS stability of 0.041 degrees to each. Fig 4 Stability of MRG YIG-1 verses MRG YIG-2. Note air conditioning compressor turn on at ~45 minutes. 5. Preliminary Conclusions These early results have produced an antenna YIG stability of 0.025 degrees RMS. Adding to this number in RSS (root sum squared) fashion 0.058 degrees RMS from the MRG YIG produces a stability of 0.063 degrees RMS. Translating up to the final LOs of 225 and 685 GHz produces 2.02 and 5.29 degrees RMS of phase variation, respectively. The phase variation seen between these two LOs and therefore between the two observed signals is 5.66 degrees RMS which corresponds to a contribution to the reduction in sensitivity of less than 1%. Further tests are required to characterized the performance of the remaining 7 antennas. We would ultimately be interested in staring at a 230 GHz and 690 GHz beacon over several hours to establish the phase stability of the overall system working together. Fig 2 Antenna cabin photos. Left , cryostat with optics cage. Gunn oscillator and multiplier assemblies are located on the top of the optics cage. Water vapor radiometer optics are just visible on upper left. Center, IF/LO electronics showing IF-1/IF-2 (left) and YIG-1/YIG-2 (right) assemblies. Right, azimuth fiber optic tension assembly. The yellow fibers pass through the center of the azimuth encoder and are pulled taught by a spring loaded assembly.

Transcript of Characterization of Instrumental Phase Stability on the SMA Interferometer D. Y. Kubo a, T. R....

Page 1: Characterization of Instrumental Phase Stability on the SMA Interferometer D. Y. Kubo a, T. R. Hunter b, R. D. Christensen c, P. I. Yamaguchi c a Academia.

Characterization of Instrumental Phase Stabilityon the SMA Interferometer

D. Y. Kuboa, T. R. Hunterb, R. D. Christensenc, P. I. Yamaguchic

aAcademia Sinica, Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, Hilo, HIbHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA

cSmithsonian Submillimeter Array, Hilo, HI

AbstractAtmospheric water vapor causes significant undesired phase fluctuations for the SMA interferometer, particularly in its highest frequency observing band of 690 GHz. One proposed solution to this atmospheric effect is to observe simultaneously at two separate frequency bands of 230 and 690 GHz. Although the phase fluctuations have a smaller magnitude at the lower frequency, they can be measured more accurately and on shorter timescales due to the greater sensitivity of the array to celestial point source calibrators at this frequency. In theory, we can measure the atmospheric phase fluctuations in the 230 GHz band, scale them appropriately with frequency, and apply them to the data in 690 band during the post-observation calibration process. The ultimate limit to this atmospheric phase calibration scheme will be set by the instrumental phase stability of the IF and LO systems. We describe the methodology and initial results of the phase stability characterization of the IF and LO systems.

MIRROR 1

2

3

4

5

6

POLARIZATIONSPLITTER

SIS

ISOLATOR/

SIS BIAS

HEMT

1ST STAGE(65K)

3RD STAGE(4K)

2ND STAGE(14K)

RECEIVER SET A(4 INSERTS, 1

SHOWN)

RECEIVER SET B (4INSERTS, NONE

SHOWN)

xNGUNNOSC.

xM

fwd

F(s)

finetune

Fo

FIN

AL

LO (

SK

Y +

/- 5

GH

z)

coursetune servo

CRYOSTAT

LOCATED ON OPTICS CAGE

IF-1 OUT (5 GHz)

~109 M

Hz R

EF

ER

EN

CE

-30 dBm

YIG-1OSC.

fwd

F(s)

finetune

Fin - F

o =200 M

Hz

coursetune

FORx

FORx

FOTx

1550 nm

1310 nm

DIP

LEX

ER

200 MH

z RE

FE

RE

NC

E

200 MHz

109 MHz

ANTENNA IF/LO Box

+5 dB

m (nom

)+

20 dBm

(max)

FOTx

10 MHzPLL 100 M

Hz

FOTx

1550 nm

WD

MF

OR

x

1310 nm

.

.

.

6-W

AY

PD

4-WA

Y P

D

.

.

.

SAMPLER2-BITS

x4

208 MH

z

LENS

2ND STAGEAMP

ISOLATOR

2ND STAGEAMP

WD

M

6.2

to 8

.3 G

Hz L

O52 MHz CLOCK

6 BLOCKSFc = 1 GHz

(328 MHz EACH)

4 CHUNKS / BLOCKFc = 153 MHz

(82 MHz EACH)

2ND LOSYNTH.

724 MHz806

12761194

TOTAL OF 6 X 4 = 24CHUNKS PERRECEIVER IF

1ST LOSYNTH.

3180 MHz

35083836

61646492

6820

(flat)

(flat)

(oval)

(oval)

TO

CO

RR

EL

AT

OR

~109/200 MHz

IF

AN

TE

NN

A

CO

NT

RO

L B

LD

G

-7 dBm(nom)

+4 dBm(nom)

1310 nm

+2 dBmnom

+11 dBm(nom)

OP

TIC

AL S

PLIT

TE

R

10-WAY PDANT-1

PD

TO RCVR-B YIG-2

(HARDWARE SHOWNONLY FOR RCVR-A)

-3 dBm

(-10.5 dB)

+4 dBm(nom)

1310 nm

(-0.5 dB)

1310 nm

ORTEL

ORTEL

ORTEL

(-0.5 dB)

-5 dBm(nom)

1550 nm

LASERTRON

NOTES:

horn

harmonicmixer

fixed multiplier

fwd = LOrvrs = {Fgunn - (M x LO)} = ~109 MHz

109 MHzerrorDC

error

Ambient LoadCalibration

1st DOWNCONVERTERLO

~109 MHz

5+/-1.25GHz

BPF

ISOLATOR

5+/-1.25GHz

BPF Direct DigitalSynthesizer

4-Wy PD

4-Wy Sw

Digital PLL Assy

DCerror

GUNN PLL &MULTIPLIER ASSY

(1 PER RECEIVER INSERTREQUIRED)

TO

OT

HE

R G

UN

NP

LL & M

ULT

IPLIE

RA

SS

Y'S

TO

OT

HE

R G

UN

NP

LL & M

ULT

IPLIE

RA

SS

Y'S

FIBER-C

FIBER-A

ANT-8CSO

JCMT

.

.

.

DEMUX8-BITS

SE TODIFF

16-BITSDIFFERENTIALECL / CHUNK

2nd DOWNCONVERTER

52 MH

z

CHUNKS 1-4

CHUNKS 4-8

CHUNKS 9-12

CHUNKS 13-16

CHUNKS 17-20

CHUNKS 21-24

1

2

6

.

.

.

FANOUT

GPSReference

x10 &100 MHz

PLLx2

x10

DDS(~9 + 100

(MHz)

52 MHzPLS

SUM

x6, 7 or 8MULTIPLIER

52MHz

(1 PER ANTENNA IFREQUIRED)

MRG YIG-1PLL

HP 8644B

fwd

F(s)

finetune

0.2 to 500 MHz

coarsetune

6, 7, or 8 GHz

5.5 to 8.5 GHz

VARIABLE ATTENUATOR IS SERVOED ONLY ONCE AT BEGINNING OF TRACK TO OPTIMIZE LO DRIVE TO YIG OSCILLATOR.

VARIABLE ATTENUATOR IS SERVOED ONLY ONCE TO OPTIMIZE IF DRIVE TO FIBER OPTIC TRANSMITTER (FOTx).

VARIABLE ATTENUATOR IS SERVOED ONLY ONCE TO OPTIMIZE LO DRIVE TO YIG OSCILLATOR.

VARIABLE ATTENUATOR IS SERVOED ONLY ONCE TO OPTIMIZE YIG LO DRIVE TO GUNN PLL.

VARIABLE ATTENUATOR IS SERVOED ONLY ONCE TO OPTIMIZE IF DRIVE TO MIXERS.

VARIABLE ATTENUATOR ARE SERVOED CONSTANTLY TO OPTIMIZE DRIVE TO SAMPLERS.

SECONDARY PHASE ROTATORS REMOVE RESIDUAL FREQUENCY OFFSETS FOR FRINGE STOPPING.

2

1

4 3

5

7

6

Fig 1 Smithsonian Submillimeter Array RF System Block Diagram

IF-2 OUT (5 GHz)

-30 dBmTO RCVR-B SYSTEM(NOT SHOWN)

SU

M

from MRGYIG-2 PLL

List of Acronyms:BPF = Band Pass FilterFORx = Fiber Optic ReceiverFOTx = Fiber Optic TransmitterMRG = Master Reference GeneratorNOM = NominalPD = Power DividerPLL = Phase Lock LoopWDM = Wave Division Multiplexer

LO-1

LO-2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

IntroductionThe Submillimeter Array (SMA) is a collaborative project of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics (ASIAA) of Taiwan. The array consists of eight six-meter diameter antennas with receivers operating from 180 to 700 GHz and a digital correlator with 2 GHz of bandwidth. Located on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, the primary elements of the SMA interferometer can be reconfigured across 24 pads which provide baselines ranging from 8 to 500 meters. Each antenna cryostat assembly houses up to 8 receiver inserts consisting of low-noise superconducting (SIS) mixers. The inserts can be used in pairs for increased bandwidth and for polarimetry observations. Local oscillators (LOs) are used in each antenna to provide heterodyne mixing from the sky frequency to the 5 GHz intermediate frequency (IF). A system block diagram for the IF/LO system is provided in Fig 1. Photos are provided in Fig 2. Instrumental phase stability measurements are discussed herein.

1. IF Functional Description and Impact on Phase StabilityThe IF path which carries the 4 to 6 GHz signal begins within the antenna cryostat just after the SIS mixer (lower left of Fig 1). This signal is leveled then optically modulated for transmission over fiber to the main control building. The received optical signal is demodulated to electrical, leveled to accommodate for optical loss variations, then passes through the 1st down conversion which subdivides the IF signal into six blocks. A 2nd down conversion further subdivides the IF into 24 chunks each centered at 153 MHz and with a bandwidth of 82 MHz (total bandwidth of 1968 MHz). Each of these 24 chunks are fine leveled to accommodate for channel slope and sky variations then digitized using 2-bit samplers operating at 208 Msps (upper right of Fig 1). Phase movements or drifts of the IF signal do not scale with LO frequency. I.e., a 1 degree drift of the IF-1 signal relative to the IF-2 signal appears as a 1 degree offset between the 230 GHz and 690 GHz signal. We have shown that the IF drift is much less than 1 degree and is therefore negligible.

2. LO Functional Description and Impact on Phase StabilityThe LO system begins with a 10 MHz crystal oscillator phase locked to a GPS reference. A set of ~109 MHz and 200 MHz references are generated then optically modulated for transmission over fiber to the antenna. A common tunable LO (5.5 – 8.5 GHz) denoted as MRG YIG-1 PLL in the lower right of Fig 1 is optically modulated and power divided to each of the 8 antennas. Each antenna receives these LOs on fibers A and C and are demodulated to electrical then leveled to accommodate for optical loss variations. The antenna YIG-1 PLL phase locks to the 200 MHz and LO-1 to produce an output at either LO-1 +/- 200 MHz. Following the YIG-1 output is a harmonic mixer which produces multiple harmonics (M) and mixes them with the Gunn oscillator output operating in the 80 to 120 GHz band. The Gunn output is followed by a final fixed multiplier whose value is denoted as N. Table 1 provides example LO frequencies for some typical tuning frequencies. It becomes obvious from the table that a small movement in the antenna YIG phase translates to a non-trivial phase movement at the final LO. For example, a 1.0 degree phase movement at the antenna YIG output translates to 32, 48, and 84 degrees at the final LO for 230, 345, and 690 GHz, respectively, which is clearly too large because it will correspond to significant errors in the position measurement of astronomical sources and to a reduction of the image fidelity.

Table 1. Example LO frequencies for 230, 345, and 690 GHz.

MRG YIG Antenna YIG M Gunn N Final LO M*N 6.825 GHz 7.025 GHz 16 112.509 GHz 2 225.018 GHz 32 6.877 GHz 7.077 GHz 16 113.341 GHz 3 340.023 GHz 48 7.947 GHz 8.147 GHz 14 114.167 GHz 6 685.002 GHz 84

3. Experimental Tests – Stability of Antenna YIG oscillatorThe long term phase stability of the antenna YIG-1 LO was monitored by sending the signal back to the control building using the IF-2 channel (not shown in the figure). This returned antenna YIG-1 LO was mixed with the MRG YIG-1 LO to produce a difference frequency of 200 MHz, which in turn was phase compared to the MRG 200 MHz system reference using an HP 8508A vector voltmeter. The data shown in Fig 3 were taken during an actual science track at 1 sample/second and was window averaged over 60 seconds to remove fast phase variations. These data reveals a high level of stability of 0.10 degrees peak-to-peak and 0.025 degrees RMS over the first six hours. It is significant to note that there is little or no correlation of the phase to the azimuth position which implies that the azimuth fiber tension assembly is functioning as designed. Translated to the final LO frequency of 225 GHz the phase number becomes 3.2 and 0.8 degrees peak-to-peak and RMS, respectively. Assuming a similar stability for the antenna YIG-2 LO this number translated to 685 GHz becomes 8.4 and 2.1 degrees peak-to-peak and RMS, respectively.

7.0

7.2

7.4

7.6

7.8

8.0

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420

Elapsed minutes since 11:57:53 PM HST, April 16, 2006

An

ten

na

-4 Y

IG-1

ro

un

d t

rip

ph

as

e, d

eg

ree

s

-140

-80

-20

40

100

160

220

280

340

0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420

Elapsed minutes since 11:57:53 PM HST, April 16, 2006

An

ten

na

-4 A

Z p

os

itio

n, d

eg

ree

s

Fig 3 Antenna 4 YIG-1 round trip phase stability data (left) and corresponding azimuth position (right). YIG tuning was changed at ~390 minutes. Peak phase drift seen over 6 hours was just over 0.10 degrees. RMS value over this same interval was 0.025 degrees.

4. Experimental Tests – Stability between MRG YIG-1 and MRG YIG-2

10.210.310.410.510.610.710.810.911.011.111.2

0 15 30 45 60

Time, seconds since ~8:10AM, April 22, 2006

MR

G2

- M

RG

1 p

ha

se,

de

gre

es

Since the antenna YIG-1 and YIG-2 LOs are locked to MRG LO-1 and LO-2 located in the control building, it is necessary to characterize the phase stability between these MRG LOs. This was accomplished by locking MRG LO-1 to 7.000 GHz and LO-2 to 7.200 GHz and mixing the two to produce a difference of 200 MHz. This 200 MHz difference was then phase compared to the MRG 200 MHz system reference. Fig 4 shows the phase stability plot over a limit period of only one hour. This test was conducted in the morning after a science track and was affected by the air conditioning compressor turning on at approximately 45 minutes. Nevertheless a variation 0.30 degrees peak-to-peak and 0.058 degrees RMS was seen during the first 45 minutes. Assuming that each MRG YIG is drifting by equal amounts we assign an RMS stability of 0.041 degrees to each.

Fig 4 Stability of MRG YIG-1 verses MRG YIG-2. Note air conditioning compressor turn on at ~45 minutes.

5. Preliminary Conclusions These early results have produced an antenna YIG stability of 0.025 degrees RMS. Adding to this number in RSS (root sum squared) fashion 0.058 degrees RMS from the MRG YIG produces a stability of 0.063 degrees RMS. Translating up to the final LOs of 225 and 685 GHz produces 2.02 and 5.29 degrees RMS of phase variation, respectively. The phase variation seen between these two LOs and therefore between the two observed signals is 5.66 degrees RMS which corresponds to a contribution to the reduction in sensitivity of less than 1%.

Further tests are required to characterized the performance of the remaining 7 antennas. We would ultimately be interested in staring at a 230 GHz and 690 GHz beacon over several hours to establish the phase stability of the overall system working together.

Fig 2 Antenna cabin photos. Left , cryostat with optics cage. Gunn oscillator and multiplier assemblies are located on the top of the optics cage. Water vapor radiometer optics are just visible on upper left. Center, IF/LO electronics showing IF-1/IF-2 (left) and YIG-1/YIG-2 (right) assemblies. Right, azimuth fiber optic tension assembly. The yellow fibers pass through the center of the azimuth encoder and are pulled taught by a spring loaded assembly.