CHAPTER-VI - Shodhganga : a reservoir of Indian theses...
Transcript of CHAPTER-VI - Shodhganga : a reservoir of Indian theses...
CROSS-COUNTRy TRADE
The growth of hills-plains trade during the colonial
period had its root in the ambitious project of opening up
of trade-routes to Burma, Tibet and china. Though frontier
trade developed under the active encouragement of colonial
rulers / the prospect of a flourishing commerce extending to
Burma, Tibet and china, however, narrowed down to the chang
ing circumstances.
BURMESE TRADE
To the commercial interests in Britain the immediate
importance of Burma in the early nineteenth century was
not in its resources for they were largely unknown but in
its geographical position for a bridge with China. British
interest in the possibility of establishing overland contact
between India and china was shown as early as 1795 during
Symes mission to Burma. The interest had been sustained
by the fact that the trade between Burma and China during
the first half of the nineteenth century had continued in
considerable volume, both by river and by the caravan route.
!• Michael Symes, An Account of an embassy to the Kingdom of Ava^ London 1800, pp. xxix-xxxv.
199
China 's raw s i l k , s i lk c lo th / ve lve t , gold- leaf , bul l ion
and tea were exchanged for Burma's cotton and sa l to I t
was believed t h a t if the predatory a c t i v i t y of Kachin
tribesmen inhabi t ing the border region could be curbed, 2
t h i s t rade might be capable of indef in i t e expansion, l if ter
the second Anglo~Burman war/ 1852/ Lower Burma came under
B r i t i s h adminis t ra t ion . Deputy Commissioner Lieutenant
General Aurther Fytche f e l t tha t B r i t i sh public were too
l i t t l e aware of the trade which already ex i s t ed between
upper Burma and Western China. In 18 54/ Fytche estimated
t h a t the t rade v ia Brahmo between two was of £500,000 in
value•
Unfortunately, Burma's t rade with china came to a
complete h a l t af ter 1855/ when a small Muslim sect (Sunni)
in Yunan province ca l led the Panthays rebel led against the
oppressive control of the Manchu Chinese. Peking was
challenged a t tha t time by Taiping Rebellion and was
dest ined to face shor t ly thereaf te r the Anglo-French war
of 1858-60. As a r e s u l t of t h i s confusion t rade suffered©
Fytche however/ hoped t h a t t h i s t rade could be revivedo
2 o India office Archives, Bengal P o l i t i c a l correspondences MSS, EUR/ E63/ No.155 p»70/ ins t ruc t ions to symes, dated 6 February, 1795, c i ted in J . F . cady' s /A History of Burma/ 1969, p«106.
3 . D« Woodman/ The Making of Burma/ London/ 1962/ P e l 7 3 .
4 . I b i d . ,
200
Anglo-Burmese Commercial Treaty of 1862 provided for joint 5
exploration of the caravan route to Yunan through Bhamo.
The apparent possibility of obtaining Burmese co-operation
in reopening trade with china was a major concern of the
British authorities in obtaining as part of the treaty of
1867, the right of British steamers to navigate the entire
course of the irrawaddy river upto Bhamo and the privilege
of posting a British censul at that city©
No sooner had the 1867 treaty being signed. Colonel
Sladen, British agent at Mandalaya proceeded to explore
the trade-toute to China via Bhamoo Sladen expedition was
financed by commercial interests in Rangoon. Colonel
Sladen obtained Panthay assistance in clearing a path for
him but encountered difficulties on his return journey. Two
members of his Panthay escort were killed. At that time
T.T. Cooper* was invited by the Shanghai chamber of Commerce
to attempt to travel through Tibet to India. At the
5, P.P. (H.CP)/ 1905, vol. 67, No,4, 19 January, 1863»
6» D. Woodman, Qpocit., p.186. •Thomas Thronvill Cooper, 'one of the most adventurous of modern English travellers', was born in 1839. In 1859 file came to India and was employed by a mercantile firm in Madras. After two years he resigned from his position and in 1863 went to Shanghai. In 1868, he was invited by the shanghai chamber of Commerce to attempt to travel through Tibet to India. Cooper was appointed as Political Agent at Bhamo in 1870's. In 1876 he was murdered at Bhamo by a sepoy in revenge for minor punishment. V. Elwin, India* s North-East Frontier in. the Nineteenth Century, Oxford University Press, Third edition, 1972, pp. xxi-xxii»
201
beginning of 1868, he l e f t Hankow for Batang. At the
end of s ix months, a f te r passing safely through the
Chinese empire, from eas t to west, t ravers ing the almost
impassable snowy ranges of Eastern Tibet he found himself 7
a t the town of Batang, some two hundred miles from sadiya .
From Batang Cooper attempted to reach sadiyao The Chinese
a u t h o r i t i e s , however, refused to l e t him proceed and he
went instead south to Bhamo. Cooper journey demonstrated
the imprac t icab i l i ty of a t rade- route over the rugged 8
mountains.
These explorations were undertaken in direct com
petition with that.? of the French Lagree-Garnier mission,
which proceeded up the Mekong river valley into Yunan and 9
thence to shanghai in 1867-68. The French exploration
discovered that the Mekong valley was unsuitable for trade
but Red River valley leading directly into YUnan via
Tongking was eminently usable. In 1872, Bvirmese King
Mindon sent a diplomatic mission to Europe which concluded
commercial treaty with Italy and France. From this time
onwards, British commercial interests recognizing the
potential rivalry with France and Italy increased their
7o A.S.R., General Department, File No. 167J of 1878, serial No.l.
8 . I b i d . , 9 . Ind ia office Archives, Foreign Department, P o l i t i c a l
proceedings . Vol. 48 3 (1068) Nos. 123-127 of May 1868; Nos. 112-114, 203-206 of July 1868, c i t ed in I b i d . ,
202
pressure and many meetings took place at which influencial
speakers advocated opening up of China trade through
Burma, Sir Aurther Cotton, an Engineer who took part
in the First Anglo-Burmese War, addressing a meeting of
the society of Arts in 1872 / commented that the missing
link of communication was between the -Irrawaddy and the
Brahmaputra. If this distance of only about hundred miles
could be linked, then the produce of South-west China could
flow down to Calcutta as well as to Rangoon,
Burma' s continuance as an independsent state was
sharply challenged by its falling within the scope of
Anglo-French rivalry in Eastern Asia. With strong backing
from Rangoon and from the British associated chambers of
Commerce, the secretary of state for India, Lord Salisbury,
authorised a new survey of the trade route from Bhamo to
12
China. The Burmese king Mindon afforded generous assist
ance to the British^sikh contingent led by colonel Horace
A« Browne which was assigned to this task. Colonel Browne
proceeded from Rangoon to Bhamo in late 1874 to join with
Consul A.R. Margary, who was travelling overland to Bhamo
from Shanghai and was to act as Browne's Interpreter on
10 . D. Woodmun, O p . c i t . / p . 1 9 4 . 1 1 . I b i d . / 12 . H.A. Browne/ Reminiscences of t h e Cour t of Mandalaya,
1907 p p . 58-60/ 8 3 , c i t e d in a'»F. cadyf.s, Op.cit"7]i p , 10.
203
the return journey. Colonel Browne was welcomed enroute
at Mandalaya and was offered assistance including armed
escort in his journey to China border. Unfortunately
Consul Margary and a few companions who ventured out ahead
of the armed escort/ were murdered by armed Chinese on
13 21 February, 1875 in Kachin country near Yunan border.
Inspite of Burmese cooperation in the Browne - Margary
episode, British-Burma's relations took worst turn. The
Burmese king, Thibaw was suspected to be involved in
intrigues with French agents.
Imperialist rivalry between Britain and France in
south-east Asia was intensified following 1881 as a result
of the aggressive policy persued by France, French control
was extended to Annam and Tongking and then westward to
lihaos, to the left bank of the Mekong river. The river
marked the easternmost boundary of shan states tributary 14
to Burma. Domination of Tongking's Red River valley also
afforded France at long last easy commercial access to
Yunan province of China. Provocation also came from the
decision of the executive council of the Government of
Burma for levying, in August 188 5, of an exorbitant fine
of rupees twenty three lakhs on the Bombay-Burma Trading
13. Ibid.,
14, Ibid., p,117.
204
Corporation for alleged i l l e g a l ex t rac t ion of tea logs 15 from Burmese t e r r i t o r y . A subsidiary of the Wallace
Company^ a leading Scot t i sh firm in London and Bombay^
the said corporat ion entered Burma in the middle of the
nineteenth century to secure teak for the Great Indian
Peninsular Railways* I t a lso dea l t in r i c e , gram, co t ton ,
o i l / explorat ion and shipping. I t was an inf luencia l
Corporat ion. In t r igues of t h i s corpora t ion , pressures
from the chambers of Commerce of London and Liverpool/
and the Anglo-French r i v a l r i e s a l l these combined to p re
c i p i t a t e the annexation of Upper Burma in 188 5 by the
B r i t i s h . •'•
With the in tegra t ion of Burma in to imperial empire/
the question of developing t rade- rou tes to Burma l o s t I t s
importance. Burma became a par t of Br i t i sh empire since
the e i g h t i e s of nineteenth century and i t s economy was
well in tegrated in to the imperial economy during the
succeeding decades.
Even a f te r the annexation of Upper Burma, Br i t i sh
o f f i c i a l posted', in Assam were s t i l l arguing the merit of
opening up of a p rac t icab le route between nortern d i s t r i c t s
15. D.R. Sardesa i , B r i t i sh Trade and Expansion in South-East Asia 1830-1914, New Delh i , 1979, Also see A. Gtiha* s review of the same book in Economic and P o l i t i c a l Weekly, v o l . V I I I , No.45, November 11 , 1978.
15. I b i d . , 18. D.R. Sardesa i , O p . c i t . ,
205
IP of Assam and Burma. F.J« Needham/ Assistant Political
Officer of Sadiya explored two routes from the river
Dihing in Upper Assam towards Hukong valley. Though he
failed to reach Hukong valley/ explored to a considerable
extent two routes leading to it, one of which after leaving
the Dihing river crossed the Patkoi at an elevation of
4,650 feet/ and going up the Nongyang lake and Longlai
river reaciied to a singpho village called Namyang/ distant
eight marches from Dafa Nong's village in the Hukong
valley. The other of which going through the hills south
of Margherita via Yogli and Namchik river/ crossed the
Patkoi at an elevation of 7,300 feet and after passing
through the villages of Phoong, Morang/ shangye/ Hashan,
Khulluk/ reached a village in Hukong, inhabited by a
Singpho chief called sumbaynong. This village was distant
two days journey from Khulluk and was the farthest point
reached by Needham. In a letter written to the secretary
to the Government of India/ the secretary to the chief
Commissioner of Assam expressed the view that since Upper
Burma had become British territory, the belt of the
territory that intervened between it and Assam/ inhabited
by 'wild tribes* / must instead of being left alone as a
18 o A.S.R., File N0.547J of 1887/ From the Commissioner of Assam valley Districts to the Secretary to the Chief Commissioner of Assam, Letter No. 33,90, dated Gauhati 18 July 1887.
^^' Z^i^* File N0.613J of 1888, From the Secretary to the Chief Commissioner of Assam to the Secretary to the Government of India/Letter No.1/533, dated shillong/ 22 June / 1888 .
206
convenient barrier, be gradually brought under control
from one side or other and wherever the boundary between
two provinces was to be ultimately fixed, whether at
Patkoi or elsewhere/ it was for the interest of both the
provinces that the country should be explored and communi-20
cation established.
With the passage of time/ initial enthusiasm
gradually died out. As pointed out by G.R. Irwin, Under
Secretary to the Government of India, to the Chief Commis-21
sioner of Assam^
In view/ however of the difficulties which would attend any immediate attempts in that direction and the comparative unimportance at the present time of any results that could reasonably be anticipated from thei , even if completely successful, the Government of India do not now proposes to carr^ out any further exploration in that quartero
Along the old Burmese route through singpho terri
tories/ some traffic went on in Indian tea, blanket/ matches
22 etco Bhamo/ the great trade centre on the Trrawaddy river,
attracted a large number of hill tribes from Tirap district
of Arunachal Pradesh. Through them some of the articles
20. Ibid., From G.R. Irwin, Junior Under Secretary to the Government of India, Foreign Department, to the secretary to the Chief Commissioner of Assam, Letter No. 1,8 50E dated, Simla, 18 September, 1888.
21. Ibid., 22o E . c . Young, "A J o u r n e y from Yunan t o Assam," Geogra
p h i c a l J o u r n a l , V o l . XXX, J u l y t o December , 1907 .
207
23
that were imported from Assam found way to Burma. The
actual trade was not voluminous because any one making
the journey had to carry such a large stock of provisions/
as to preclude the possibility of carrying much merchandise.
LURE OF CENTRAL ASIAN MARKETS
The existence of a route into Tibet by the Brahma
putra river was known to the British Government even before
the British occupation of Assam. A list of stages from
Sadiya to Rima, a town in the Tibetan province of Zayul /
numbering twenty altogether was explored by Lieutenant
24 Neufville in 18 25 and published in Asiatic Researches.
In 1826 captain Wilcox succeeded in advancing
three-quarters of the way to Rima along the southern or
left bank of the Brahmaputra but was stopped by the refusal
25 of the Mishmis to allow him to pass through their country.
Ten years later in 1836, W. Griffith followed the same
route to a point about half between sadiya and Rima and
then crossing the Brahmaputra river, visited some Mishmi
villages on the northern side but he too was deterred from
attempting further progress by the refusal of Mishmi chiefs
23. S. Dutta choudhury (ed)., Tirap District Gazetteers, Shillong, 1980, p.133.
24 , A .s .R. / F . P . , August 1886, From the secre ta ry to the Chief Commissioner of Assam to the Secretary to the Government of I nd i a , Foreign Department, Le t te r No 11,941/ dated Shi l long/ 21 June, 1886.
2 5 . I b i d . ,
208
26 to give him a safe-conduct. Lieutenant E.A. Rowlatt,
was the first explorer who in 18 44 followed the route
along the right on north bank of the Brahmaputra and went
as far as the river Du or Madum within sixty miles of the
Tibetan border and turned back on being told that the
27
intervening country was destitute of inhabitants. In
December 1869 and January 1870/ T.T. Cooper/ who in 1868
failed to reach India from Tibet/ attempted journey towards
Tibet by the route along the southern or left bank of the
Brahmaputra, He reached to a village called Prun/ some
twenty miles from Rima but was prevented from proceeding
further. Cooper received aid from Calcutta Chamber of 28 Commerce to pioneer the way,
Inspite of the difficulties experienced in promoting
British-India's trade with Tibet and China/ the British
constantly cherished a hope to extend their trade in central
Asia and this desire to capture markets articulated their
policy towards Eastern Himalaya. The Trigonometrical survey
29 of India embarked on its venture of exploring Tibet. It
trained and despatched native agents into Tibet. Pandit
A c(Nain Singh) visited Lhasa/ Ganden and Sera between
26. Ibid./
27. Ibid.,
28 o A.S.R./ General Department, F i le No. 167J of 1878/ Se r i a l No. I .
29. A.. Deb/ Bhutan and India - A Study in Front ier P o l i t i c a l Relat ions (1772-1865)/ Calcut ta 1976/ p«163«
209
30 1865-66 and his explorations yielded valuable results.
Soon he was followed by Pandit B and No.9. In addition
to scientific observations^ these adventurers collected
information about commerce of Tibet and her natural
31
resources . Though T.T. Cooper's mission ended in
f a i l u r e / Governor-General India in Council was much
in t e re s t ed in exploring Tawang and Eastern Assam routes
to T ibe t . The chief Commissioner of Assam strongly
recommended t h a t the survey par ty under captain Woodthrope,
which had penetra ted in Arunachal Pradesh during 1876-77
and became known to the t r i b e s who traded with china on
the one hand and Assam on the other / should complete 32
their work of exploration. The Chief Commissioner pointed
out that the obvious advantages of a direct trade-route,
if such a route could be found between India and China
need not be recapitulated. Quoting S.E. Peal/ a planter
of Sibsagar district/ the chief Commissioner of Assam
pointed out to the secretary to the Government of India
that such a route need not interfered with Bhamo route.
33 In S.E. Pea l ' s words/
To imagine tha t the trade to England from western China would go by the valley of Assam/ while Irawadi was open would be abiburd/ i t would be equally so to expect the Indian t rade to go via the Irawadi . Each would take what would leg i t imate ly belong to i t .
30 . A. Deb/ O p . c i t . / 3 1 . I b i d . / 32. A.S.R./ General Department/ F i le No. 167J of 1878/
Ser ia l No.4/ From the secre tary to the Chief Commiss ioner of Assam/ to the Secretary to the Government of Ind ia /Le t t e r No.1477/dated Shillong 5 September 1878
3 3 . I b i d . /
210
In a bid to mobilise public opinion/ C. Lepper
of Alexander Lawrence & Co. appealed in the leading
34 newspaper/ 'Englishman'/
Let any of your readers look for a moment at a map of Asia, and it will puzzle him on most maps to discover anything to separate British Province of Assam from the Chinese province of Yunan. They appear next door neighbour and now that attention has been drawn to this fact, let me further explain that no geographical difficulties of any moment intervene between the two countries to prevent a good drivable road being made©
The Indian Tea Gazette of 4 May, 1878/ pointed out that
the opening up of western China to Manchester and shefield
trade in the bad times, when English manufactures were
suffering so severely from the competition of America,
Australia and Belgium, was surely no slight claim on
35 attentiono
Since the mid-nineteenth century, a movement was
set on foot in London, to agitate for the extension of
Assam Trunk Road from sadiya through Singpho country to
tap the provinces of Sezchuen and yunan. Meetings were
held in London by the British officials and planters of
Assam. An association called 'Assam Association' and a
34. Ibid./ Extract from the Englishman, dated 25 March leTe.
35. Ibid., serial No.2.
211
a working committee comprising Sir T. Wade, Sir Alcok
and other were formed. It pointed out in an issue of
the 'Englishman' of 5 June 1878, that to tap sezchuen,
the most direct route lay apparently by the way of Rima
on the Brahmaputra. To tap Yunan, a route lay by the
Noadihing valley to the Borkhampli country to Atenze/ the
border town of Yunan. To tap B&tma, the convenient route
37
was by the Noadihing val ley and Meinkhoon to Bhamo. In
Ju ly 1878, a memorial was presented by i t s member to
Secretary of State for India in council for l inking Assam 38
with ch ina .
The industrial depression of 1880's led many
manufactures to re-emphasize the pressing need for new
markets. Report on trade between Assam and the adjoining
foreign countries for the year 1880-81, pointed out that
the trade of Assam could not become important as long as
it remain confined to the wild regions immediately beyond
the province. The only prospect of development of trade
lay in the possibility of establishing safe and permanent
communication with South Western china from Assam and this
was yet in the somewhat distant future. The construction
of railways, the report pointed out, which had been
36. I b i d . , 3 7 . I b i d . f 38 . I b i d . ,
212
cominenced from Dibrugarh to Sadiya would facilitate
triiffic of course, but the trade it would carry would
be of tea and other products of the province of Assam
and merchandise from Bengal for consumption in Assam.
The railways however, would be a valuable adjunct in
developing external traffic if a safe and convenient
trade-route to China could be established and maintained
through the almost unknown region lying between south-
39 western china and Northern Burma and Assam. The same
40 view was expressed by another trade report of 1883-84.
Colman Macaulay, a Secretary of the Government of Bengal,
who was sent as head of a mission to Tibet in 1885 in
41 his memorandum on relations with Tibet pointed out.
The more we can push the facilities of trade by the cis Himalayan passes by cultivating friendly relations with Lama Government and by making roads to the frontier of Tibet, the greater will be the progress of southern trade... Assam fabrics, raw coarse, silk cloth are sought by all classes of men from the highest to the lowest ... The demand for this coarse staff is incredibly large but the supply is meagre.
Along with these, was the prospect of finding in Tibet a
market for Indian tea.
39. Report on Trade Between Assam and the Adjoining Foreign Countries for the year 1880-81.
40o Review of the Trade by Land of British India with Foreign countries for the year 1883-8 4.
41. N.A.I., F.D., secret F, May 1885, proceeding No.752
213
FEASIBILITY OF TEA. TRADE
The question of introducing Indian brick tea
into Tibet was one which occupied the attention of Board
of Tea Industries for many years. The potentialities of
tea trade was discussed in Fyzabad Conference/ held on
26 January 1880. The proceedings of the conference laid
down that the question of supplying Indian tea for central
Asia was one which should at no time be neglected and all 42
means should be taken to afford its every possible opening.
In a book entitled 'Tea Trade with Tibet* written
by L. Listard and published by Agriculture Department of
Government of India in 1880, the question was discussed at
43 length. In the first place it was pointed out that any
attempt to open such a trade would not in the least inter
fere or divert any tea from the well established outlets/
which planters had in Europe, Australia, United states as
well as in India itself. Such a division could take place
if the same sort of produce was required both for these
markets and Tibet. But this was not so. What was necessary
to manufacture expressly for Tibet/ a new produce with
leaves the coarest, the hardest, which certainly no European
would care to take, the way Chinese prepared tea for Tibet.
42. N.A.I./ Political A/ July, 1880, Proceedings No.80.
43. L. Listard, Tea-Trade with Tibet/ Government of India/ Simla, 188 3.
214
This new class of produce therefore would not interfere
with the already existing industry and would not divert
a single leaf from the already existing markets. Such
being the case, the planters of North-Western provinces/
Punjab, Bengal and Assam would find it profitable to
turn attention in utilising the waste and refuse of their
plantations. It was suggested that the planters should
push the Indian tea, prepared in such a way as to suit
Tibetan taste and habit, and introduce it among the people
of Tawang, Bhutan, Sikkim and Garwal where from tea would 44
very well find its way to Tibet proper.
The Report of the Agriculture Department in Assam
for 1884-8 5 laid down that the place indicated by the
Bhutanese of Dewangiri, as the source of their tea, was
doubtless the Chinese emporium on the Tibetan frontier,
Darchendo. That the wants of the Bhutanese should be
supplied by tea from the distant and inaccessible region
when the tea-gardens of Assam were lying within their easy
access could be explained only by the fact that Assam tea
was unsuitable to their peculiar taste. It was difficult
to believe that if a brick tea like that of Darchendo was
offered to them from the gardens of Assam at a lower price,
44. L. Listard, Op.cit.,
215
the former not soon be driven out of the market atleast
in all the southern part of Bhutan and if the tea could
only be offered cheap enough, it might penetrate into
Tibet through the medium of Bhutanese and supplant
45 Darchendo tea over the western portion of that country.
COLONIAL ACHIEVEMENTS
The attempts of the nearly whole of the century
to penetrate into central Asian markets was not crowned
with much success. The hostile attitude of the Tibetans
and the events that followed stood on the way of promotion
of direct trade with Tibeto
Between December 1885 and January 1886/ vT.F.
Needham* Assistant Political Officer at sadiya undertook
an expedition from sadiya to the Zayul valley of Eastern
Tibet. Needham succeeded in crossing the frontier and
advancing twenty-six miles into Tibetan territory but on
approaching the village of Rima, where the Governor of
the Province was believed to reside, he was met by a
demonstration of force. Needham failed to enter into
communication with local authorities and was obliged to 46 return back to Assam. In 188 5 caiman Macaulay obtained
45. A.S.R., B.P.P., September/ 1870, Proceeding No.4, From Colonel J.c. Haughton, Commissioner of the cooch Behar to the Secretary to the Government of Bengal,Letter No. 69, dated Jalpaiguri, 22 July, 1870.
46. Ibid.# F.P.,August 1886/From the Secretary to the Chief Commissioner of Assam to the Secretary to the Government of India, Letter No.1410, 23 July 1886.
216
Chinese assent to lead a mission to Lhasa. The Tibetan
Government/ however, was opposed to closer intercourse
with India for they were suspicious of British activities
47 in India.
In 1816/ the British through the Treaty of Sugauli
had not only extended their influence in Nepal but had
also acquired the Himalayan districts Kumaon and Ghaxrwal,
The group of hill states from Tehri to the borders of
Ladak also passed into British control about the same time.
A few years later/ in 1835/ the British acquired Darjeeling
from Raja of Sikkim. In 18 46, Lahul and Spiti were
detached from Ladak and brought under British control.
Later on Ladak, which lay on the west of Tibet, also
came under British influence. The Tibetans were alarmed
at this rapid extension of British power in and around
the Himalayan Kingdoms. Mac'aulay Mission was successfully
opposed by the Tibetans. In 1886, Tibetans sent a small
body of militia to occupy LingthU/ which is about twelve
48 or thirteen miles within Sikkim frontier. They were
driven out by the British and negotiations between Britain
and china followed. A convention between the two powers
was signed on 17 March, 1890. The undivided supremacy
of the British in Sikkim to the total exclusion of all
49 powers was recognised in 18 90.
47. C. Bell/ Tibet/ Past and Present/ London, 1924; B. Nand/ British India and Tibet, New Delhi/1975/ p.4.
48. H.E. Richardson, Tibet and its History,New Delhi,1975. 49. Bidya Nand, Op.cit., ppo5-6.
217
In accordance with the convention of 1890/ a
trade treaty was concluded between China and Britain in
1893. By this treaty/ a trade mart was established at
Yutung, eight miles on the Tibetan side of the frontier.
British had all along accepted Peking's suzerainty over
Lhasa and therefore there could be no direct communication
between the Government of India and the Tibetans. Yutung
was unsuitable for a trade mart and though every attempt
was made by the British to induce Chinese to substitute
Phari for Yutung^ it was found impossible to overcome
50
their reluctance. Phari was at the head of the Chumbi
valley/ on the southern side of the main Himalayan range/
whereas Yutung was thirteen miles inside the Chumbi valley
from the sikkim Tibet frontier. The Chinese must have
thought that British presence at Phari would weaken Peking's
hold over Lhasa. But this was not all. The Tibetans
nullified the attempt of opening the trade mart at Yutung
by building a wall. This prevented British traders and
travellers from going any further into Tibetan territory.
Attempt to develop Yutung were frustrated by Tibetan 52
obstructions.
The event showed that Chinese influence was on the
wane and when Curzon arrived in India as Viceroy, there was 50, India Government to secretary of State, July 4/ 1893/
Foreign proceedings/ secret E, August 1893, proceeding No.44/ cited in Ibid./
51, Ibid., 52o C. Bell^ Op.cit.y pp.61-62.
218
^ 53 as It were a power vacuum m the north. Rumours were
afloat that the Chinese had surrendered their sovereign
rights to the Russians and that Russian arms had already
54 reached Lhasa. Curzon feared that if the Russians came
to Tibet/ they would certainly endanger peace and security
of India's Himalayan borxJers . To counteract Russian designs
the viceroy despatched colonel Younghusband ostensively
on a peace mission, but in reality to establish British
influence in Tibeto The mxssion was opposed enroute by
the Tibetans but ultimately they were compelled to retreat.
Younghusband succeeded in concluding a treaty with
Ti-Rimpoche, the Regent and the members of the Tibetan
National Assembly. By the Lhasa convention of 1904, the
British succeeded in establishing direct contact with the
Tibetans and in extending their influence in Tibet to the
exclusion of all Foreign powers o
This was construed by the Russian Government tanta
mount to the establishment of British protectorate over
Tibet. The India office was not prepared to accept an
agreement which was offensive to the Russians and with
53. H.K, Barpujari/ Problem of the Hill Tribes; North-East Frontier 1873-1962/ volume III/ polSl.
54. c. Bell/ Op.cit. / p.62; H.E. Richardson, Op.cit./ p.4; A. Lamb, Britain and Chinese Central Asia the Road to Lhasa 1767-lb^Ob, London, 1V60, pp.2 53ff.
55. F.B. Younghusband, India and Tibet/London» 1910,p.417.
56. C. Bell, Op.cit., Appendix, IX, pp. 284-87.
219
whom it was then anxious to arrive at a settlement of 57
its disputes in Central Asia. On the insistence of
the Home Government, the British Indian Government con
cluded a treaty with china in 1906 with a view to secure
Peking's approval of Lhasa conventiono This was* however,
not a simple adhesion agreement but a separate treaty
which nodoubt confirmed the nglo-Tibetan Treaty but also
whittled away the gains of the "younghusband Mission and
the Lhasa convention. British not only ireaffirmed China's
control over Tibet but undertook 'not to encroach on
Tibetan territory nor to interfere in the Government of
Tibet.' China's rights in Tibet were thus recognised to
an extent to which the Chinese had been unable to exercise
58 them during that period.
The British Government further tied their hands
across the Himalayas by concluding a treaty with Russia
in 1907. under Anglo-Russian convention of 1907, the
contracting parties agreed to respect the territorial
integrity of Tibet and to abstain from all interference
in its internal administration and to carry no political 59
negotiation with Tibet except through intermediary of China.
57. H.K, Barpujari, Op.cit., pol52o
58. H.E. Richardson, Op.cit., p.94/ P. Mehra, The North-Eastern Frontier^ Vol. I, 1906-14, pp-1.4
59. P. Mehra, op.cit..
220
By the new Trade Agreement of 1908/ activities of the
British Trade Agent was restricted even at Gyantse and
Yutung. Not only the number of escorts at the marts
were to be reduced and gradually replaced by the Chinese,
but the telegraph line from the Indian frontier to Gyntse
and r t. hooste built by the British along the route were
to be sold out to the Chinese at original costo
The political situation and increasingly cautious
attitude of the British influenced comntercial relation of
British India with nations on immediate frontier. The
keynote of British policy towards central Asia during
this period was to wait for opportunity and not to *' risk
the substantial gain of Entente Cordiale with china by
clutching too eagerly at the problematic chances of
Tibetan markets.'*
Moreover/ by the later part of the nineteenth
century it became evident that the wealth of Tibet was 6>2
much fabricated by early explorers. In Tibet towns are
few and had limited population. The villages were not
numerous and the buildings with the exceptions of monasteries
did not convey the picture of an affluent society. The
60o P. Mehra, Op.cit./
6 1 . H.R. R i s l ey ( e d ) , The G a z e t t e e r of s ikk im, p . x i i .
62o N . A . I . / F . P . , May 1865, S e c r e t F , Proceeding No.752.
221
Tibetans did not lad^ warm clothing. These were sold
in Katmandu at a much cheaper rate. In the climate of
Tibet/ cotton cloth was not sufficient. So the Manchester
63 goods were not in demand. Similarly in China^ villagers
wove a coarse cloth of a kind which was almost worn by
majority of the people of china. It was more durable
than the foreign shirtings and the foreign materials
could not supply an equal material to that commonly worn
64 by the Chinese people.
T^^ only hope was trade on tea. In 1870, Deputy
Commissioner of Lakhimpur left with the agency muharir
at Sadiya/ a small quantity of brick tea procured from
superintendent of the East India Company/ with the instruc
tions to give it to the Mishmi traders who had direct
65 intercourse with the Tibetans. The idea was to give
tea as present to the Mishmis with the hope that they
would carry tea into Tibet and by selling there at cheap
rate would create a demand for it. The attempt however,
failed to yield any result in that direction. In 1887,
Deputy Commissioner of Kamrup after making careful enquiry
pointed out that there was no opening whatsoever for
63. Ibid.» J. Sen, Indo~Nepal Trade in the Nineteenth century, Calcutta, 1977, pol26.
64o N.A.I./ Foreign Political B, January 1878, proceedings NO.I.
65. A.S.R., B.P.P., 1870, From Deputy Commissioner of Lakhimpur to the Commissioner of Assam, Letter N0.25P dated Dibrugarh, 2 April, 1870,
222
Indian tea in Bhutan or Tibet* even i£ made in brick
form. The sale o£ tea in Tibet was apparently a Chinese
monopoly and Indian t ea even if low priced would meet no
encouragement.
Brick t ea was e s sen t i a l l y a low-class t e a , being
composed of old l eaves , s t a l k s and struck together with
mucilage and some degree of p ressure , Chinese disposed
t h e i r rough tea to Tibet and a prohib i t ion existed in 67 Tibe t of B r i t i s h tea enter ing in to T ibe t . sezchuen
province of China supplied Tibet annually 2/000,000 Lbs,
of t e a valued at about 100,000 t a e l s (£250,000) and produ
cing a revenue of about 150,000 t a e l s . A large number of
po r t e r s were engaged to t ranspor t t h i s huge quant i ty of
t ea from sezchuen to d i f f e ren t pa r t s of T ibe t . The
Tibetan trade was in the hands of Lamas vAio would have
na tu ra l ly resented any d i s loca t ion in t h e i r tea businesso
Moreover, the Chinese o f f i c i a l s s ta t ioned a t Lhasa also
thr ived on the funds ra ised by tea t r a d e . The Lamas used
t o give to the Chinese whatever s i l v e r they required and
Amban repaid the advance by documents which freed the
Tibetan t raders from the payment of duty a t Tachienlu.
66 . I b i d . , F . P . , July 1887, Proceeding No.2, From Deputy Commissioner of Kamrup to the Secretary to the chief Commissioner of Assam, Le t te r No, 894, dated Gauhati 2 2 June , 1887.
67. I b i d . , 68 . N . A . I . , F . P . , Secret E, August 1893, proceedings
No. 23 , c i t ed in B. Nand, O p . c i t . , p . 9 .
223
Thus the admission of Indian tea in to Tibet would have
dis turbed Chinese o f f i c i a l ' s f inancia l arrangements/
imperiled Lama's tea monopoly/ thrown f ron t ie r por te rs
out of work and deprived Sezchuen tea-growers of a market 69
for a million tael's worth of tea annually.
A native of Sezchuen domiciled at Darjeeling once
manufactured some brick tea and sold it to a Tibetan who
took it to Tibet but was stopped/ fined and his tea confis
cated and destroyed on the frontier. A guard of Tibetan
71 soldier was quatered at Rxma to prevent trade in Assam tea.
The facts disclosed show that there was an apprehension
that British Indian tea would successfully compete with
China tea and the Chinese influence was exercised to keep 72
it out of marketo Over and above/ carriage was so
difficult and routes were so steep that no trade in such
73 a bulky article of any importance could be established»
The interests in Tibet as shown by commercial
concerns of London such as Dewsbury and Bradford Chambers
of Commerce / always depended on the provision that the
Tibetans would be persuaded to acquire a taste for Indian
tea. This on the other hand depended on the development
69. Ibid./ Proceeding No.7/ cited in Ibid., 70o A.S.R./ B.P.P., No.4/ From Colonel J.c. Haughton,
Commissioner of cooch Behar to the secretary to the Government of Bengal/ Letter No. 69/ dated Jalpaiguri/ 22 July 1870.
71. Ibid.., File No. 167J of 1878, Serial No.I. 72 o Ibid. / B.P.P./ September 1870/ Proceeding No.4-» 73« Ibid./ F.P./ July 1887, Proceeding No,2»
224
of easier means of cominunication and spread of western
influence. The British experience during Macaulay Mission
showed that this could be brought by force only and by
1886 it was decided that the prize did not justify the 74
efforts.
Coming to the actual extent of trade that went
through Eastern Himalaya to Tibet, it has been seen that
in the different trade centres and weekly huts that g::r'.ew
up in the frontier and at annual trade-fairs, the hill
tribes came down with their usual hill products and in
exchange they took European and Indian manufactures. As
the hill-tribes / particularly the Arunachalis/ were in
the habit of exchanging with the Tibetans and Chinese,
through them British piece goods and manufactures of
plains poured into those countries. Commenting on the
export of cloths at Udalguri fair. Colonel comber, the 75
Deputy commissioner of Darrang reported, A large portion of the cloths taken up by this pass are sent to North Tibet and even to the inhabitants beyond Tibet and I have nodoubt that the sales at udalguri are influenced a great deal by the tastes or fashions prevailing at the time amongst the actual consumers.
The direct trade with Tibet was possible only at
Udalguri fair where Tibetans continued to come down annually
74. A. Lamb, Op.cit., p.359. 75c Report on Trade Between Assam and the Adjoining
Foreign Countires 1878-79.
225
to trade. There were also some Tibetans who resorted
to Dewangiri via Bhutan. The introduction of cheap
Liverpool salt pushed Tibetan salt out of market. At the
beginning of the century/ the Arunachalis brought down
Tibetan rock-salt in the markets of Assam. In 1875-76/
the quantity of Tibetan salt imported into Udalguri fair
76 was 1/889 maunds and at Doimara 225 maunds. In 1876-77,
the quantity imported in Udalguri and Doimara fairs was/
77 1/764 maunds 19 seer and 259 maunds respectively. The
salt was bartered for Assamese cloth and other articles
of local produce. In Lakhimpur district/ the Tibetan
rock salt was imported by the people of Assam for medicinal
78 purpose only. Eventually/ rock salt failed to compete
with cheap Liverpool salt.
LABOUR MIGRATION
While a flourishing trade could not be developed/
under the prevailing condition of labour and capital in
the province of Assam/ the idea of obtaining surplus
population of Yunan in Assam to settle or hire for work
also could not be entertained.
The Assam Company in its early years paid its
76. A.S.R./ R.P./ June 1878/ From the Secretary to the Chief Commissioner of Assam to the secretary to the Government of India/ Letter No. 1/584 dated Shillong 8 June 1878 .
77. Ibid./ 78. Ibid./
226
imported Chinese staff some seventy workers a t one stage
four to five t ine the wage ra te paid to the corresponding 79 ca tegor ies of Assamese labour. In Gauhati, the labour
on t e a -p l an t a t i ons was obtained on terms equivalent to
wages at rupees two and e ight annas a month. In Dibrugarh
where wage was h ighes t , labourers were paid at the ra te
of rupees four and eight annas a month. Taking rupees
five as the highest l imi t of wage paid in Assam by 1864/
t h i s was not even half of what would have secured a Chinese 80 l abour . On the other hand, ten rupees a month-'; was a
much higher leve l t h a t was suf f ic ien t to inundate Assam
with tabouK^-from Bengal. There were thousands of Chinese
and Shans in Pegu and Tenassyrim. Any able bodied Shans
or Chinese could earn more than rupees ten a month in
Pegut^ or Tenassyrim. The surplus population of Ytuaan could
find t h e i r way in to Pegu and .Tenassyrim via the Shan s t a t e s
without coming in to contact with Burmese at a l l . To 81
quote Henry Hopkinson, the Chief Commissioner of Assam,
Yunan i s as sparsely populated as iSi-ssam and the f e r t i l e val leys of Khyndueng and Irrawady are even more th in ly inhabi ted . While for most p a r t s ty le of l iv ing of the inhabi tants i s superior to t h a t of the people of Jkssam/ nei ther Chinamen, nor Shans could subsis t on the highest wages t ha t have been h i t h e r t o allowed in Assam, they were accustomed to be t t e r food, be t t e r c lo ths and be t t e r lodging than the Assamese.
79 . H.A. Antrobus , A History of the Assam Company, Edinburg, 1957, pp,3Sa[-88.
80o A.S.R., Let ter issued to Government, Vol. No,38, 1869, From F. Jenkins , Agent to the Governor-General,North-East Front ie r to the Secretary to the Government of Bengal ,Letter N o . I I , dated Gauhati , 14 June, 1864,
8 1 . I b i d . , Le t te r No.18, dated Gauhati 20 January, 1864.
227
Hence / even i £ an e a s y and s a f e r o u t e from Yunan
was e s t a b l i s h e d / t h e p r o s p e c t d i d n o t a p p e a r v e r y b r i g h t
and a s such no a t t e m p t was made t o l i n k Assam w i t h C h i n a .
PROSPECT OF TRADE AT THE END OF THE CENTURY
The c a r d i n a l hope of e x p a n s i o n of commerce t o
c e n t r a l A s i a t h r o u g h E a s t e r n H ima laya however / d i d n o t
f a d e o u t d u r i n g t h e p e r i o d under s t u d y . Even i n 1 9 0 1 /
t h e q u e s t i o n of f i n d i n g a new m a r k e t i n T i b e t f o r I n d i a n
t e a was n o t g i v e n up and t h e i d e a of p r e p a r i n g I n d i a n t e a
e x a c t l y i n C h i n e s e f a s h i o n was d i s c u s s e d . I n a memorandum
of 13 A p r i l 1903 / c o l l e c t i n g a l l a v a i l a b l e i n f o r m a t i o n on
t r a d e - r o u t e s be tween I n d i a and T i b e t / W . F . T . O 'Connor /
who l a t e r was t o accompany Younghusband t o Lhasa^ n o t e d
t h a t Tawang was a m a r t of some i m p o r t a n c e as t h e d i s t r i b u
t i n g c e n t r e of goods from Lhasa and e a s t e r n T i b e t / from
B h u t a n , I n d i a and Assam and from f e r t i l e though ' s a v a g e
d i s t r i c t s ' of s o u t h - e a s t e r n T i b e t and he hoped t h a t commerce
of t h i s p l a c e would someday assume f a i r l y l a r g e p r o p o r t i o n s .
H i s r e p o r t f u r n i s h e d a f a i r l y a c c u r a t e d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e
8 3 Kameng d i v i s i o n and t r a d e - r o u t e t h r o u g h Tawang.
The e x p l o r a t o r y t o u r of Noel W i l l i a m s o n / t h e t h e n
8 2 . N . A . I . / F . D . / E x t e r n a l B, S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 0 1 / No. 186 .
8 3 . N . A . I . / F o r e i g n s e c r e t a P r o c e e d i n g s June 1903 / N o s . 3 0 3 - 4 .
228
Assistant Political officer of Sadiya, to south-eastern
Tibet in 1907-8 , focussed considerable attention on the
practicability of Lohit as the 'natural highway' to Tibet.
Noel Williamson reported that the real obstacle to the
development of trade had been the lack of incentive and
if communications were developed along the Lohit valley
and the facilities for exports were made available, a good
bridle path developed from the borders of Tibet to sadiya
the shape of things would change. Once the Tibetans
learnt that every hide and every pound of wool! had a
marketable value in Assam/ which could be reached quickly,
comfortably and safely, and where in return they could
purchase tea, clothing etc., commercial interchanges were
84 assured and expenditure in the route justified. A rail
link with china extending the railhead from Saikhowtaghat
to Chinese province•^Szechuen as advocated by Thomas
Hodrich and supported by Noel Williamson occupied the
85 attention of the British authorities for sometime.
It was only after 1908 , when Chinese under Chao
Erh-feng, the newly appointed Imperial Commissioner of
Tibet, overran Eastern Tibet and after subjugating Pome*
Pemako and Zayul, the southern part of Tibet, attempted to
84« P. Mehra, The MeMahon Line and After, Madras, 1944, p«13.
85o MoL. Bose, British policy in the North-East Frontier Agency, New Delhi, 1979, p.W.
229
penetrate Yunan to Upper Burma, then under British rule
including Hpinaw/ Ahkyang and Hkaitipti Long that the
shadow of Chinese monster started haunting the British
Government and the idea o£ cross-country trade was allowed
to fall in apathy on defensive ground. Although the
British and the Indian manufactures found an outlet into
central Asia, the volume was too small to achieve the
target originally anticipatedo
APPENDIX - ~J
EXTRACTS FROM THE LETTER OF SECRETARY TO THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF ASSAM ON TIBETAN TRADE
26. Notwithstanding their internal feuds the Mishmi
find time to do a good deal of trade both with the zayul
valley and with Assam. Wilcox was struck by the mercantile
propensity of these people. "Every man among them" he
wrote "is a petty merchant". Lieutenant Rowlatt describes
them as divided into two classes who trade ipespectively
with Assam and Tibet (i.e. the Digarus and Mi jus) the
latter "have nothing to offer in barter but the Mishmee-
teeta and poison/ which is only to be found on the moun
tains near the limit of perpetual snow being in great
request with the people of Tibet/ they are enabled to
exchange it for cattle/ gongs, sword and copper vessels."
He adds that they also do a great deal of barter among
themselves. The Pandit A-K tells us that the Zayul valley
is much frequented by traders from Mishmi tribe who bring
Jungle products (grass, bark and dye-stuffs), deer skins
and cloth and money from Assam and exchange them for
salt and horned cattle. Mr. Needham, met several parties
A.S.R./ F.P./ August 1886/ Letter No.1/410/ 23 July 1886.
231
of Mijus returning from Zayul with the cattle which
they had brought/ and he noticed that one of the Tibetans/
in the party which blocked his way to Rima had on a dress
of Assamese muga silk. To the articles enumerated by
the Pandit/ he adds musk-pods on the part of the Mishmis,
and woollen coats/ brass and iron vessel/ swords/ beads/
silver amulets and ammunition, supplied by the Tibetanso
Similarly wileox says that the Taieng chief "are seen
wrapped in long cloaks of Tibetan woollens/ or in hand
some/ jackets of the same" and that their wives wear a
profusion o£ beads of wMte porcelain/ or of colourless
glass mixed with oblong pices of coarse cornelian and
all of Tibetan or Chinese manufactures. Besides the
Zayul valley/ another rendezvous for trade is the Maduan
river/ to which the Tibetans can resort either by way of
the Brahmaputra or by the Mdaun valley route which has
been mentioned above. The Mijus and Digaru Mon^o clan
keep the Tibetan trade in their own hands/ while the
Digaru Taiengs similarly engross the trade with ssamo
Th .s monopoly on the part of the Taieng is felt as a
grievance by the eastern section of the Digarus/ and the
Manjo clan begged Mr. Needham to persuade their westerly
Kinsmen to admit them also to a share of ita
232
27. «»* *** ***
28 o These extensive trading enterprises suggest the
possibility of encouraging the cominercial intercourse of
the Mishmis with Assam, Mr. Needham is of opinion that
if the Digarus were not so jelous in guarding their
monopoly/ large number of Mijus, and likewise Tibetans,
could come to sadiya yearly to trade. The Tibetans/
however (or the inhabitants of Zayul) are hind ced also by
the exclusiveness of their own Government, which hitherto
prevented them from entering British territory. The two
Tibetans whom Lieutenant Rowlatt met at Tipping on the
Mdaun told him that they were not allowed to visit the
plains of Assam. Cooper was assured by the Miju chiefs
that all intercourse with Assam was forbidden by the Lamas
on the pain of death. The only natives of the zayul valley
whom we know to have entered sadiya seems to have been
the man whom Kaiya brought to captain Dalton in 18 52/ on
the ill-omened expedition out of which his quarrel with
the whitemen arose. If/ however/ the mission now going
to Lhassa should succeed in establishing a better under
standing with Tibet/ the route of the Brahmaputra valley
may prove an important one for supplying the Eastern
Tibet with English goods. Mr. Needham's return march from
Rima occupied only sixteen days, though some of the
233
marches were much shorter than regular trading stages.
It may be assumed that with the help of a fair bridle
path, the journeys could be done by laden men or animals
in twelve days or a fortnight. From Rima to the Pass Ata
gang La at the head of the Rong Thod ChU/ where the
highlands of Eastern Tibet are entered upon/ is 15 days
journey. If the alternative route out of the zayul valley
is preferred/ it is only six days' journey frora Rima to
the Tiha pass at the head of the Zayul Chu. On the other
hand^ the journey from Ata gang La pass to Chili Shiogong
on the sanpo south of the Lhasa/ as travelled by the
Pandit A.K./ Contains 45 stageS/ while there are 24 stages
between Lhasa and Darjeeling. The Brahmaputra valley
route has thus a great advantage in shortness, as a means
of communication between British India and Eastern Tibet.
The first step towards improving this route would be the
construction of a good track for pack-animals from Sonpura
as far as the Dalei/ or perhaps as far as the Mdaun from
either of which rivers there are two routes into Tibetan
territory. In all this distance there is only one con
siderable range of hills to cross viz./ th^t which inter
venes between the Yamne and the Tiding and is crossed at
an altitude of about 4,500 feet. For the rest of the way,
a level track can be laid without difficulty.