Chapter 8 (sub for sharon)

44
Chapter 8 Group Processes

description

Social Psychology Class at AIB College of Business

Transcript of Chapter 8 (sub for sharon)

Page 1: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Chapter 8

Group Processes

Page 2: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

What makes up a group?

Page 3: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

What is a Group?

• A set of individuals who have at least one of the following characteristics:– Direct interactions with each other over a period

of time

– Joint membership in a social category based on sex, race, or other attributes

– A shared, common fate, identity, or set of goals

Page 4: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Why Join a Group?

• The complexities and ambitions of human life require that we work in groups

• Humans have an innate need to belong to groups

• May not only protect against physical threat, but also help gain personal and social identity

• Gossip is Grooming Theory of Language

Page 5: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Group RolesIt is essential to match roles to each member’s characteristics and skill set – Figure 8.1

Page 6: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Individuals in Groups:The Presence of Others

Page 7: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Social Facilitation:When Others Arouse Us

• How does the presence of others affect our behavior?

• Triplett’s (1897-1898) fishing reel studies.• Later research found conflicting findings.

– Sometimes the presence of others enhanced performance.

– At other times, performance declined.• What was going on?

Page 8: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

I need a volunteer to… shoot some hoops

Page 9: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Why Does Social Facilitation Occur?

• Zajonc’s Mere Presence Theory

• Evaluation Apprehension Theory– It’s not just about presence– They must be in a position to evaluate– Blindfold study (Cottrell et al., 1968)

Page 10: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Why Does Social Facilitation Occur? (cont’d)

• Distraction Conflict Theory– Dividing attention between task, arousal, and

performance– Maintains there is nothing uniquely social

about “social” facilitation

• Which theory is correct?

Page 11: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Will one person clap…

Page 12: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Ok…now everyone

Page 13: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

People will cheer louder when they cheer as part of a group than when they cheer alone.

Answer: False… Let’s see why!

Putting Common Sense to the Test…

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KpoqynjV1g

Page 14: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Social Loafing: When Others Relax Us

• Ringelmann (1880s): Individual output declines on pooled tasks.

• Social Loafing: A group-produced reduction in individual output on easy tasks in which contributions are pooled.

Page 15: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Figure 8.4: Social Loafing: When Many Produce Less

Adapted from Jackson & Williams, 1985; Sanna, 1992.

Page 16: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Ever been part of a team that didn’t work together?

Page 17: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Ever been part of a group that just wasn’t effective?

Page 18: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

When Is Social-Loafing Less Likely to Occur

• People believe their own performances can be identified and thus evaluated, by themselves or by others (e.g., look around the room and make sure every one is doing this with us)

• The task is important or meaningful to those performing it (e.g., …so every one can hear us)

• People believe that their own efforts are necessary for a successful outcome

Page 19: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

When Is Social- Loafing Less Likely to Occur? (cont’d)

• The group expects to be punished for poor performance

• The group is small• The group is cohesive

– Cohesiveness – factors that bring a group closer together (e.g., threat by an outgroup)

Page 20: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Why Does Social Loafing Occur?

Collective Effort Model: Individuals try hard on a collective task when they think their efforts will help them achieve outcomes they personally value.

Page 21: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Collective Effort Model: It Has to Be Personal

Page 22: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Collective Effort Model: It Has to Be Personal

Page 23: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Collective Effort Model: It Has to Be Personal

Page 24: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Collective Effort Model: It Has to Be Personal

Page 25: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Collective Effort Model: It Has to Be Personal

Page 26: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Deindividuation

The loss of a person’s sense of individuality and the reduction of normal constraints against

deviant behavior.

• A collective phenomenon that only occurs in the presence of others

• What can lead to deindividuation?

Page 27: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Environmental Cues

• Accountability cues affect the person’s cost-reward calculations.

• Attentional cues focus a person’s attention away from the self.

Page 28: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Two heads are better than one.

Answer: False… Let’s see why!

Putting Common Sense to the Test…

Page 29: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Brainstorming

A technique that attempts to increase the production of creative ideas by encouraging

group members to speak freely without criticizing their own or others’ contributions.

Page 30: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Brainstorming

You are a doctor faced with a patient who has a malignant tumor in his or her stomach. It is impossible to operate on the patient, but unless the tumor is destroyed the patient will die. There is a special type of ray that can be used to destroy the tumor, as long as the rays reach the tumor with sufficient intensity. However, at the necessary intensity, the healthy tissue that the rays pass through will also be destroyed and the patient will die. At lower intensities, the rays are harmless but they will not affect the tumor either. What procedure might the doctor employ to destroy the tumor with the rays, at the same time avoiding destroying any healthy tissue? (Duncker, 1945)

Page 31: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

In groups of three discuss possible solutions to solve this

problem.Let’s try another story…

Page 32: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Table 8.3: Brainstorming in Groups: Problems and Solutions

Page 33: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Problem Solving by Analogy

A general is attacking a fortress. He can’t send all his men in together as the roads are mined to explode if large numbers of men cross them. He therefore splits his men into small groups and sends them in on different roads. (Duncker, 1945)

Page 34: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Electronic Brainstorming

Page 35: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Table 8.3: Why Electronic Brainstorming is Effective

Page 36: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Conflict: Cooperation and Competition Within Groups

Page 37: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Social Dilemmas

Situations in which a self-interested choice by everyone creates the worst outcome for

everyone

What is good for just you is bad for all.

Page 38: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Figure 8.9: The Prisoner’s Dilemma

Page 39: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Large groups are more likely than small groups to exploit a scarce resource that other members collectively depend on.

Answer: True… Let’s see why!

Putting Common Sense to the Test…

Page 40: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Resource Dilemmas• Social dilemmas concerning how two or

more people share a limited resource.

• Two types of resource dilemmas:– Commons dilemma– Public goods dilemma

Page 41: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Common DilemmasHow much would you take of a resource that is not renewable (as much as you could, as much as everyone else, only as much as you needed?)

Page 42: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Common DilemmasHow much would you take of a resource that is not renewable (as little as you needed, as much as everyone else, as much as you could?)

Page 43: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Public Goods DilemmasHow much do you feel obligated to pay into these

things on a daily basis?

Page 44: Chapter  8 (sub for sharon)

Ok…Let’s take a 10 minute break

Then back to Chapter 7