Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

41
Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

description

Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis. Natural tolerance limits are defined as follows:. Process Capability. Uses of process capability. Process may have good potential capability. Reasons for Poor Process Capability. Data collection steps:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Page 1: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Chapter 8. Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Page 2: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process Capability

Natural tolerance limits are defined as follows:

Page 3: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Uses of process capability

Page 4: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process may have good potential capability

Reasons for Poor Process Capability

Page 5: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Data collection steps:

Page 6: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Example 7-1, Glass Container Data

Page 7: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 8: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Probability Plotting

Mean and standard

deviation could be estimated from

the plot

• The distribution may not be normal; other types of probability plots can be useful in determining the appropriate distribution.

Page 9: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process Capability Ratios

Example 5-1:

2

USL = 1.00 microns, LSL = 2.00 microns

ˆ 0.1398R

d

Page 10: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Practical interpretation

PCR = proportion of tolerance interval used by process

For the hard bake process:

Page 11: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

One-Sided PCR

Page 12: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 13: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• Cp does not take process centering into account

• It is a measure of potential capability, not actual capability

Page 14: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Measure of Actual Capability

Cpk: one-sided PCR for specification limit nearest to process average

Page 15: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Normality and Process Capability Ratios

• The assumption of normality is critical to the interpretation of these ratios.

• For non-normal data, options are:1. Transform non-normal data to normal.2. Extend the usual definitions of PCRs to handle non-normal

data.3. Modify the definitions of PCRs for general families of

distributions.

• Confidence intervals are an important way to express the information in a PCR

Page 16: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Confidence interval is wide because the sample size is small

Page 17: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Confidence interval is wide because the sample size is small

Page 18: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Use only when the process is not in control.

Process Performance Index:

2

If the process is normally distributed and in control:

ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆ and because p p pk pk

RP C P C

d

Page 19: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• Specifications are not needed to estimate parameters.

Process Capability Analysis Using Control Chart

Page 20: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Since LSL = 200

Page 21: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Process Capability Analysis Using Designed Experiments

Page 22: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Gauge and Measurement System Capability

Simple model:

y: total observed measurementx: true value of measurementε: measurement error

2 2Gauge and are independent. , and 0, Px x N N

Page 23: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 24: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 25: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

k = 5.15 → number of standard deviation between 95% tolerance intervalContaining 99% of normal population.k = 6 → number of standard deviations between natural tolerance limit of normal population.

For Example 7-7, USL = 60 and LSL = 5. With k =6

P/T ≤ 0.1 is taken as appropriate.

Page 26: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Estimating Variances

22GaugeˆBecause we estimate 0.887 0.79 :

Page 27: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

The gauge (with estimated SNR < 5) is not capable according to SNR criterion.

Signal to Noise Ration (SNR)

SNR: number of distinct levels that can be reliably obtained from measurements. SNR should be ≥ 5

ˆ ˆFor Example 7-7: 0.0786 and 1 0.9214.M P M

Page 28: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Discrimination Ratio

DR > 4 for capable gauges. For example, 7-7:

The gauge is capable according to DR criterion.

Page 29: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 30: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Gauge R&R Studies

• Usually conducted with a factorial experiment (p: number of randomly selected parts, o: number of randomly selected operators, n: number of times each operator measures each part)

2

2

2

2

0, : effects of parts

0, : effects of operators

0, : joint effects of parts and operators

0, : effects of operators

i P

j O

POij

ijk

P N

O N

PO N

N

Page 31: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• This is a two-factor factorial experiment.

• ANOVA methods are used to conduct the R&R analysis.

Page 32: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 33: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 34: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

• Negative estimates of a variance component would lead to filling a reduced model, such as, for example:

Page 35: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

σ2: repeatability variance component

→For the example:

With LSL = 18 and USL = 58:

This gauge is not capable since P/T > 0.1.

Page 36: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

21 2

1 1 2 2

2 2

1 1

For , , , , assume , and independent from each other.

Let ... .

Then ,

n i i i

n n

n n

i i i ii i

x x x x N

y a x a x a x

y N a a

Linear Combinations

Page 37: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 38: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Nonlinear Combinations

1 2: nonlinear function of , , ,

: nominal (i.e., average) dimension for (for 1,2,... )

Taylor series expansion of :

n

i i

g x x x

x i n

g

R is higher order (2 or higher) remainder of the expansion.R → 0

Page 39: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
Page 40: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

Assume I and R are centered at the nominal values.α = 0.0027: fraction of values falling outside the natural tolerance limits.Specification limits are equal to natural tolerance limits.

2

/ 2 0.00135

Assume 25 1 Amp or 24 26 and I 25, .

3.0

26 253.0 0.33

I

II

I I N

Z Z

2Assume 4 0.06 ohms or 3.94 4.06 and I 4, .

4.06 4.003.0 0.02

R

RR

R I N

Assuming V is approximately normal:

Page 41: Chapter 8.  Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis

For normal distribution with unknown mean and variance:

• Difference between tolerance limits and confidence limits

• Nonparametric tolerance limits can also be calculated.

Estimating Natural Tolerance Limits