Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All...

58
Chapter 7: Chapter 7: Monopoly Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Transcript of Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All...

Page 1: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Chapter 7:Chapter 7:MonopolyMonopoly

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Page 2: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-2

Monopoly Structure: Monopoly = Monopoly Structure: Monopoly = IndustryIndustry

oThe essence of market power is the ability to alter the price of a good or service.

oA monopoly is one firm that produces the entire market supply of a particular good or service.

oSince there is only one firm in a monopoly industry, the firm is the industry.

LO-1

Page 3: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-3

Monopoly = Industry Monopoly = Industry

oThe firm’s demand curve is identical to the market demand curve for the product.oMarket demand is the total quantities of a

good or service people are willing and able to buy at alternative prices in a given time period.

LO-1

Page 4: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-4

Price versus Marginal RevenuePrice versus Marginal Revenue

oMarginal revenue (MR) is the change in total revenue that results from a one-unit increase in quantity sold.

oPrice equals marginal revenue only for perfectly competitive firms.

oMarginal revenue is always less than price for a monopolist.

LO-1

Page 5: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-5

Price versus Marginal RevenuePrice versus Marginal Revenue

oA monopolist can sell additional output only if it reduces prices.

oThe MR curve lies below the demand (price) curve at every point but the first.

LO-2

Page 6: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-6

Price versus Marginal RevenuePrice versus Marginal Revenue

oTotal revenue before price reduction= 1 ton x $6,000/ton = $6,000

• Total revenue after price reduction= 2 tons x $5,000/ton = $10,000

• Marginal revenue= $10,000 – $6,000 = $4,000

LO-2

Page 7: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-7

Where Price Exceeds Marginal RevenueWhere Price Exceeds Marginal Revenue

LO-2

Page 8: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-8

Where Price Exceeds Marginal RevenueWhere Price Exceeds Marginal Revenue

LO-2

Page 9: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-9

Monopoly BehaviorMonopoly Behavior

oA monopolist must make a pricing decision that perfectly competitive firms never make.

LO-3

Page 10: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-10

Profit MaximizationProfit Maximization

oThe monopolist uses the profit-maximization rule to determine its rate of output.

oAccording to the rule, a monopolist maximizes profit at the rate of output where MR = MC.

LO-3

Page 11: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-11

Profit MaximizationProfit Maximization

oThe profit maximization rule applies to all firms:–A perfectly competitive firm produces the

quantity where MC = MR (= p).

–A monopolist produces the quantity where MC = MR (<P).

LO-3

Page 12: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-12

The Production DecisionThe Production Decision

oChoosing a rate of output is a firm’s production decision.

oIt is the selection of the short-term rate of output (with existing plant and equipment).

oA monopolist finds the rate of output where the marginal revenue and marginal cost curves intersect.

LO-3

Page 13: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-13

The Monopoly Price The Monopoly Price

oThe intersection of the marginal revenue and marginal cost curves establishes the profit-maximizing rate of output.

oThe demand curve tells us the highest price consumers are willing to pay for that specific quantity of output.

oOnly one price is compatible with the profit-maximizing rate of output.

LO-3

Page 14: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-14

The Monopoly Price and Profit The Monopoly Price and Profit MaximizationMaximization

LO-3

Page 15: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-15

Monopoly ProfitsMonopoly Profits

oTotal profit equals profit per unit times the number of units produced.

oProfit per unit = price minus average total cost

Profit per unit = p – ATC

•Total profit = profit per unit times quantity

Total profit = (p – ATC) x q

LO-3

Page 16: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-16

Monopoly ProfitsMonopoly Profits

oProfit can also be calculated by subtracting total cost from total revenue:

Total profit = TR - TC

LO-3

Page 17: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-17

Monopoly versus Competitive OutcomesMonopoly versus Competitive Outcomes

o A monopolistproducesless andcharges ahigher pricethan acompetitiveindustry.

LO-4

Page 18: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-18

Barriers to EntryBarriers to Entry

oBarriers to entry are obstacles that make it difficult or impossible for would-be producers to enter a particular market, e.g., patents.

LO-4

Page 19: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-19

Threat of EntryThreat of Entry

oA monopoly attains higher prices and profits by restricting output.

oThe threat of entry does not affect a monopolist due to high barriers to entry.

LO-4

Page 20: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-20

Barriers to EntryBarriers to Entry

oPatent Protection

oLegal Harassment

oExclusive Licensing

oBundled Products

oGovernment Franchises

LO-4

Page 21: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-21

Patent ProtectionPatent Protection

oA patent is a government grant of exclusive ownership of an innovation.

oA patent is a source of monopoly power.oPolaroid’s patents forced Kodak out of the

instant-photography business.

LO-4

Page 22: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-22

Legal HarassmentLegal Harassment

oSuing potential new entrants can deter entry into an industry.

oLengthy legal battles are so expensive that the threat of legal action may deter entry into a monopolized market.

LO-4

Page 23: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-23

Exclusive LicensingExclusive Licensing

oLack of a license makes it difficult for potential competitors to acquire the factors of production they need.

LO-4

Page 24: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-24

Bundled ProductsBundled Products

oForcing consumers to purchase complementary products thwarts competition.

oBundling products makes it difficult for competitors to sell their products profitably:oMicrosoft bundles software applications with

its Windows operating systems.

LO-4

Page 25: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-25

Government FranchisesGovernment Franchises

oA monopoly granted by a government license:oThese include local power, telephone, and

cable TV companies.

oAnother example is the U.S. Postal Service in providing first-class mail.

LO-4

Page 26: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-26

Comparative OutcomesComparative Outcomes

oA monopoly’s market power allows it to change the way the market responds to consumer demands.

LO-4

Page 27: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-27

Competition versus MonopolyCompetition versus Monopoly

oIn competition, as well as monopoly, high prices and profits signal consumers’ demand for more output.

oIn competition, the high profits attract new suppliers.

oIn monopoly, barriers to entry are erected to exclude potential competition.

LO-4

Page 28: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-28

Competition versus MonopolyCompetition versus Monopoly

oIn competition, production and supplies expand and prices slide down the market demand curve.

oIn monopoly, production and supplies are constrained and prices don’t move down the market demand curve.

LO-4

Page 29: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-29

Competition versus MonopolyCompetition versus Monopoly

oIn competition, a new equilibrium is established and average costs of production approach their minimum.

oIn monopoly, no new equilibrium is established and average costs are not necessarily at or near a minimum.

LO-4

Page 30: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-30

Competition versus MonopolyCompetition versus Monopoly

oIn competition, economic profits approach zero and price equals marginal cost throughout the process.

oIn monopoly, economic profits are at a maximum and price exceeds marginal cost at all times.

LO-4

Page 31: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-31

Competition versus MonopolyCompetition versus Monopoly

oIn competition, the profit squeeze pressures firms to reduce costs or improve product quality.

oIn monopoly, there is no profit squeeze to pressure the firm to reduce costs or improve product quality.

LO-4

Page 32: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-32

Near MonopoliesNear Monopolies

oTwo or more firms may rig the market to replicate monopoly outcomes and profits.

LO-4

Page 33: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-33

Near MonopoliesNear Monopolies

oIn duopoly two firms together produce the industry output.

• In oligopoly several firms dominate the market.

• In monopolistic competition many firms each have a monopoly on its own brand image but still must contend with competing brands.

LO-4

Page 34: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-34

WHAT Gets ProducedWHAT Gets Produced

oThere is a basic tendency for monopolies to inhibit economic growth.

oThere is no pressure to produce at minimum average cost.

LO-5

Page 35: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-35

WHAT Gets ProducedWHAT Gets Produced

oMonopolies do not engage in marginal cost pricing:–Marginal cost pricing means firms offer

(supply) goods at prices equal to their marginal cost.

Monopolies do not deliver the most utility with the available resources.

LO-5

Page 36: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-36

FOR WHOM FOR WHOM

oHigher prices charged by monopolists favor purchases by higher-income consumers.

oMonopolists get fat profits and thus access to more goods and services.

LO-5

Page 37: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-37

HOW HOW

oMonopolists have less of an incentive to innovate.oThey can continue to make profits with

existing equipment and technology.

oThere is a tendency to inhibit technological improvement by keeping competition out of the market.

LO-5

Page 38: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-38

Any Redeeming Qualities? Any Redeeming Qualities?

oDespite the strong and general case to be made against monopoly, monopolies could also benefit society.

LO-5

Page 39: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-39

Research and DevelopmentResearch and Development

oIn principle, monopolies have a greater ability to pursue research and development. oThey have the resources available to invest in

expensive R&D functions.

oThey have no clear incentive for invention and innovation and can continue to make profits by maintaining market power.

LO-5

Page 40: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-40

Entrepreneurial Incentives Entrepreneurial Incentives

oThe promise of even greater profits is a strong incentive for monopolies to innovate.

oInnovators in perfect competition also have the ability to earn large profits.

LO-5

Page 41: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-41

Economies of Scale Economies of Scale

oEconomies of scale are present if average costs fall as the size (scale) of plant and equipment increases.

LO-5

Page 42: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-42

Economies of ScaleEconomies of Scale

oA large firm can produce goods at a lower unit cost than a small firm because of economies of scale.

oConsumers may not benefit from the lower costs if the monopolist doesn’t lower its prices.

LO-5

Page 43: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-43

Diseconomies of ScaleDiseconomies of Scale

oEven though large size may result in greater efficiencies, there is no assurance that it actually will.

oMonopolies may generate diseconomies of scale, producing at higher cost than a competitive industry.

LO-5

Page 44: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-44

Natural Monopoly Natural Monopoly

oA natural monopoly is an industry in which one firm can achieve economies of scale over the entire range of market supply. oExamples include local telephone, cable, and

utility services.

LO-1

Page 45: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-45

Natural Monopoly Natural Monopoly

oEconomies of scale are a natural barrier to entry.

oThere exists a potential for abuse in a natural monopoly.oGovernment regulation may be necessary to

ensure that the benefits of increased efficiency are shared with consumers.

LO-1

Page 46: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-46

Contestable MarketsContestable Markets

oPotential competition is a threat even to monopolies.

oThis may cause them to behave more competitively.

LO-5

Page 47: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-47

Contestable Markets Contestable Markets

oA contestable market is an imperfectly competitive industry subject to potential entry if prices or profits increase.

oHow contestable a market is depends not so much on its structure as on entry barriers.

LO-5

Page 48: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-48

Structure versus BehaviorStructure versus Behavior

oIf potential rivals force a monopolist to behave like a competitive firm, then monopoly imposes no cost on consumers or on society at large.

oThe experience with the Model T suggests that potential competition can force a monopoly to change its ways.

LO-5

Page 49: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-49

Structure versus BehaviorStructure versus Behavior

oCritics argue that even if markets are contestable, there will always exist a gap between a monopoly and a competitive outcome.

oThis gap can be very costly to consumers.

LO-5

Page 50: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-50

Flying Monopoly AirFlying Monopoly Air

oMarket structure explains why it is cheap to fly to one place and expensive to fly somewhere else of equal distance.

LO-5

Page 51: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-51

Industry StructureIndustry Structure

oFrom a national perspective, the airline industry looks pretty competitive.

oHowever, all of these companies do not fly to the same place.

LO-5

Page 52: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-52

Industry StructureIndustry Structure

oWhen assessing market structure, it is essential to specify the relevant market.

oIn many markets, there is only one or two air carriers, thus the firms in this market act like duopolies or monopolies.

LO-5

Page 53: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-53

Industry BehaviorIndustry Behavior

oAir fares from airports dominated by one or two carriers are 45-85 percent higher than at more competitive airports.

LO-5

Page 54: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-54

Entry EffectsEntry Effects

oHow fares change when airlines enter or exit a specific market can be used to assess the impact of market structure on prices.

oAmerican Airlines cut its fares when low-cost carriers entered a market it dominated – then raised them when they left.

LO-5

Page 55: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-55

Entry EffectsEntry Effects

oPredatory pricing – temporary price reductions designed to drive out competition.

LO-5

Page 56: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-56

Barriers to EntryBarriers to Entry

oOne of the most formidable entry barriers to the airline industry is the ownership of landing rights and gates.

oAt Washington, D.C.’s National Airport, the six largest carriers owned 97 percent of available takeoff/landing slots in 2000.

LO-5

Page 57: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

7-57

Barriers to EntryBarriers to Entry

oTo offer service from that airport, a new entrant would have to buy or lease a slot from one of these firms.

oIf existing firms are unwilling to sell or lease their slots, then competition is thwarted.

LO-5

Page 58: Chapter 7: Monopoly McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

MonopolyMonopoly

End of Chapter 7End of Chapter 7

7-58