Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
-
Upload
bhagwanjashnani -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
1/31
Agency Law
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
2/31
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
3/31
An agent (A) is a person who has beenauthorized, either expressly, by conductor by implication, to act for another
party which is called the Principal (P).The agent is making and entering intolegal relations with a third party on
behalf of the principal. The resultingcontracts are therefore made betweenthe Principal and the third party and
not directly with the agent..
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
4/31
An agency relationship exists in lots ofsituations:
A director acts as an agent for hiscompany.
A partner acts as an agent for hispartnership.
An estate agent is appointed by a seller
of a house to find a buyer. A travel agent is appointed by a holiday
company to make bookings with
customers.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
5/31
Principal
Agent 3rd Party
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
6/31
By Expressagreement
By Impliedagreement
ByNecessity
ByRatification
By Estoppel
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
7/31
Principal expressly appoints theagent Verbally or In Writing.
Generally in writing contractsare preferred because exactnature and scope of the
relationship can then be setdown.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
8/31
An agent is not expresslyappointed by the Principal to
work on his behalf but agencyis implied to have establishedfrom the relationship between
the parties or from theirconduct.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
9/31
This requires four conditions to
be satisfied:Principal property is entrusted to
AgentEmergency arises making it
necessary for agent to act
In Principal interest
Not possible for agent to
communicate with Principal
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
10/31
Mr Swaffield sent his horse by railway to a station at
Sandy. The horse arrived late at night, and the railwaycompany lodged the horse overnight for their own
account at a livery stable. Mr Swaffield failed to collect iton the following morning. The only basis on which hewas prepared to give any instructions about the fate ofhis horse was that the railway company assumed all
responsibility for storing and delivering it to him fromthe time of its arrival at Sandy. After four months of this,the railway company lost patience. They unilaterallydelivered the horse to Mr Swaffields farm and then sued
him for the livery charges to date.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
11/31
A situation in which a person or company
inaccurately claims to be an agent foranother person or company and conductssome act in that capacity, but which
the Principal (who is not actually aPrinciple) later accepts and recognizes.Because the agent is not actually an agent,any act he/she conducts on behalf of thePrincipal ordinarily would be invalid;however, agency by ratification existsbecause the "Principle" confirmed the act.
http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Agenthttp://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Agent -
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
12/31
A situation in which a person or company
inaccurately claims to be an agent foranother person or company and conductssome act in that capacity, but which
the Principal (who is not actually aPrinciple) later accepts and recognizes.Because the agent is not actually an agent,any act he/she conducts on behalf of thePrincipal ordinarily would be invalid;however, agency by ratification existsbecause the "Principle" confirmed the act.
http://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Agenthttp://financial-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Agent -
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
13/31
In order for a Principal to ratify the contract :
Principal should have exited at the date ofcontract
Principal should have the legal capacity tofulfill the contract
Principal should ratify whole contract
Principal should ratify with in reasonabletime
Ratification must be communicated to third
parties
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
14/31
Facts
Promoter of the company entered into thecontract on the behalf of the company beforeit was incorporated , to purchase someproperty and third party was not paid .
Decision
Company did not exist at the time whencontract was made , the company could notratify the contract, the promoter werepersonally liable to the seller.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
15/31
Agency may be created without express or
implied agreement this arises when Principalholds out to third parties that a person is theiragent, even if the Principal and the agent have
not as such agreed to form such a relationship.It must be the Principal not the agent whodoes the holding out and third party musthave relied on the facts as held out. If this is soPrincipal is Estopped from denying that theagent in indeed their agent.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
16/31
Defendant Company had 4 directors, none of whom had
been appointed as the Managing Director.One Directorwho effectively ran the company entered in variouscontracts with the claimantsOn previous occasions, theboard on behalf of the company has honored the contractand paid the claimant.But this time the board refused to
pay.arguing that the director had NO Expressedauthority to make a contract becausehe was not theManaging Director.
Held :Director had acquired authority by Estoppel, byhonoring the previous similar contract in the past, thecompany had given the impression that the director hadthe authority to make this sort of contract.The claimantshad relied on this representation by continuing to dealwith the director when purporting to act on behalf of the
company.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
17/31
What is the authority of the
agent ?
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
18/31
Express authority
Implied authority
Apparent authority
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
19/31
In this instance, when the principal/agencyrelationship is established, the agent is instructed as towhat particular tasks are required to be performed andis informed of the precise powers given in order tofulfill those tasks. If the agent subsequently contractsoutside of the ambit of their express authority thenthey will be liable to the principal and to the thirdparty for breach of warrant of authority (see below).The consequences for the relationship between theprincipal and third party depends on whether the thirdparty knew that the agent was acting outside the scopeof their authority.
For example, an individual director of a company maybe given the express power by the board of directors toenter into a specific contract on behalf of the company.In such circumstances the company would be boundby the subsequent contract but the director would have
no power to bind the company in other contracts..
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
20/31
It frequently happens that an agent is expressly
assigned a task to accomplish, but the minor detailsare not spelled out in the oral or written authoritygiven to him.
It can be safely assumed that the agent has implied
authority to do what must be done in order toaccomplish the purpose of the express agency.
This refers to the way in which the scope of expressauthority may be increased. Third parties are entitledto assume that agents holding a particular positionhave all the powers that are usually provided to suchan agent. Without actual knowledge to the contrary
they may safely assume that the agent has the usualauthorit that oes with their osition.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
21/31
Watteau Vs Fenwick
Fred owned a hotel. He sold it to the defendants, who
then hired him as the hotel manager. Fred continued tohold the license for the hotel, which was placed over thedoor. The claimants in the case supplied cigars to Fred oncredit. The claimants believed Fred was the hotel owner.
They didnt know that the defendants (the actualowners), whom they had never heard of, had forbiddenFred to buy cigars on credit. The claimants learnt of thisand sued for the outstanding amount.
Courts decision: The court declared that a manager ofsuch an establishment had authority to purchase cigars.If limitations where imposed on this authority, then theselimitations needed to be communicated to third partiesto make the limitations effective.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
22/31
Watteau v FenwickFact :TheNew Ownerof aHotelcontinued toEmploy the Original Owneras the
ManagerIn the agency agreementthe New ownerordered theA NOT to buy certain items including
CigarsHeld :The purchase of cigars was within the usualauthority of managerof a Hotel.Also the restrictionwas NOT communicated to the world at large, beforethe contract was made.There can be 2 outcome
A liable to P 1 also P liable to 3rd party A liable to 3rd party 2
In the above case the 1st solution was undertaken
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
23/31
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
24/31
To create the wider ostensible authority
1) It must be the company that make therepresentation as to wider than usual authority
2) The representation must be one of fact ,no law .
3) The representation must be made to thirdparties.
4) The third party must in fact have relied on the
representation5) The third party must have altered their
position as a result of relying on therepresentation.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
25/31
It is not necessary for the Principal to be Identified to the3rd Party
General Rule
Contract is between the Principal and the 3rd party.
Agent is neither liable nor entitled under the contract.Agent will be personal liable in the followingexceptional circumstances :
Personal UndertakingAgent showed an intention to
undertake personal Liability (Personal Undertaking) Refusal by A (himself)Agent refuses to identify the
Principal
Fictitious P Agent is acting on behalf of a Fictitious
Principle.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
26/31
An undisclosed principal is where theprincipals existence has not been made
known to the third party. When the thirdparty discovers the existence of P, he canelect to treat P or A as bound by the
transaction.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
27/31
Fiduciary relationship is to take Good Care of PAssets, by acting in the Best Interest of the PFollowing consequences : (A-BSP)
1) AAccountable for Assets Held A has a Duty toAccount to P for all money and property
received.2) BBest interest A must Always act in the Best
interests of P.
3) SSecret Profit A Must NOT make a SecretProfit.
4) PPersonal Interest, (Self interest) A must NOT
allow his Personal Interests to Conflict withthose of P.
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
28/31
Repudiate Contract by Principal ,(Principal can repudiate the contract with the 3rdParty.)
Dismissal W/O Notice, (Agent can be dismissed
without notice)
Refuse to Pay Agent, (Principal can refuse to payany money owed to Agent or Recover any moneyalready paid.)
Recover From Agent (Principal can recover anysecret profit made or any bribe)
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
29/31
1. Remuneration/Commission(To claim
Remuneration of Commission for the servicesperformed.)
2. Reimburancement (To claim an indemnity againstP for all expenses reasonably incurred in carrying
out his obligations.) 3. Lien Over Property (To exercise a Lien over P's
property. The lien allows the agent to retain
possession of P's property that is lawfully in A'spossession until any debt to A (e.g. arrears ofremuneration) have been paid by P. )
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
30/31
By acts of the parties -agreement, completion of duties
or passage of time. By operation of law - on the
death, bankruptcy or insanity ofP or A
-
7/28/2019 Chapter 7 Agency Law Slides
31/31
December 2007
December 2011