Chapter 6 Local Integration Implementation: Challenges and ...6-1 The Republic of Zambia Data...

6-1

The Republic of Zambia Data Collection Survey for the Local Integration of Former Refugees Final Report

Chapter 6 Local Integration Implementation: Challenges and Needs

6.1 Challenges of the LI Programme

Gathering from the interviews and studies conducted with the related organizations and on the concerned households respectively, it is obvious to say that the implementation of the LI programme is complex and still faces many challenges as far as the legalization process and the relocation of former refugees to the resettlement scheme are concerned. Moreover, these two components are closely inter-related.

The main challenges identified in the various aspects are analysed as follows:

6.1.1 Progress on LI Programme

(1) Allocation of Plots

Meheba 13.9% (21.9% including Zambian) Mayukwayukwa 24.4% (25.9% including Zambian) Remarks two (2) plots in Mayukwayukwa have been allocated to Rwandan households,

and no plots in Meheba. At the time of survey, there were no more plots which can be allocated to the

target households of LI programme.

(2) Relocation to the Demarcated Plots

Meheba 6.8% (5.5% including Zambians) of targeted households have moved to their allocated plots.

Mayukwayukwa 14.5% (9.1% including Zambian) of targeted households have moved to their allocated plots.

Remarks In Mayukwayukwa, few Zambians are residing in the allocated plots.

(3) Progress of Infrastructure Construction

Meheba 23.4% of programmed access roads have been rehabilitated. 16.4% of programmed boreholes have been drilled.

Mayukwayukwa 34.8% of programmed access roads have been rehabilitated. 86% of programmed boreholes have been drilled.

6.1.2 Challenges on Project Implementation

(1) Imprecise Issues within the LI Framework

Challenge： There is no deadline (specific completion year) targeted for the completion of the programme. ( “Sustainable Resettlement in Zambia” draft concept only describes that the project period is 2017 to 2021)

There is no general project plan specifying precise targets for infrastructure development, allocation of plots, relocation to the plots, etc., to meet for the completion of the programme.

In Meheba, the border between refugee settlement and resettlement scheme is not clear.

Most of plots in Meheba have not been planned for their allocation.

6-2


There is no general layout plan of public facilities, thus, it is difficult to know whether the accessibility and number of existing facilities meet national standard requirements or not.

There is a lack of coherence between plot allocation and infrastructure development surrounding the demarcated plots.

Solutions: Preparation of project plan to determine the target completion year and to set target construction and or rehabilitation works with cost estimations, annual work schedules etc, to synchronize with plot allocation.

(2) Lack of Demarcated Plots

Challenge： The number of demarcated plots is outnumbered by the number of plot applicants. (In Meheba, a number of plots has been demarcated but not ready for allocation. In Mayukwayukwa, there is no more land for demarcation.)

In Mayukwayukwa, it is possible that plots of 10 ha be divided into two plots of 5 ha each.

Solution: Meheba All plot allocation shall be planned with demarcated plot map in the area to allow visualization of occupied plots.

Mayukwayukwa Plots in other resettlement schemes will possibly be allocated to target former refugees.

(3) Anxiety after Relocation

Challenges Unwillingness to leave their familiar residence and home-grown fruit trees Unwillingness to abandon the current community with their long-known

neighbours Anxiety of starting a new life in the resettlement scheme Anxiety about whether the allocated plot is suitable or not for agriculture

Solutions When offering plots, thorough explanations utilizing GIS will be made to former refugees.

Alternative way of demarcation; upon request, several plots will be provided to grouped households to ensure maintaining the same community structure before relocation. The use of land within the area depends on the community. For example, houses can be clustered in one common space while farms are placed in another to practise common farming activities.

Implementation of livelihood support When offering plots, the results of soil surveys will be provided together

with other plot information to settlers.

(4) Location Conditions and Living Status of Former Refugees

Challenges On both schemes, settlers moved to their current homes from the refugee settlement. Thus, accessibility from the surrounding area is worse and soil conditions are relatively poor, and not suitable for agriculture in the case of Mayukwayukwa.

There are few markets around the schemes where agricultural products can be sold. (Especially in Mayukwayukwa, there are markets only within the scheme, and no markets in the surrounding areas.)

In Meheba, because of the Lumwana Mine, there are concrete plans to develop Manyama, situated next to scheme.

The standards of living in both schemes are as follows: refugee settlement, Manyama area > standard of provincial area in Zambia > host community

6-3


near the schemes (except Manyama) > resettlement scheme There is potential demand for crops from starch fabrication company, and

labour demand from mining companies for Meheba. Possible demand for food supply by boarding schools situated in the refugee settlement of Mayukwayukwa.

Solutions In the current circumstances, support projects shall be implemented not as much as to improve livelihood but to provide livelihood support to attain at least, the same standard of living in the provincial area or that of the host communities. Livelihood activities should take note of lessons learnt from past activities funded by other donors.

As for the sale of farm crops, the priority is to stabilize income. Establishment of farmers’ groups will be considered to secure a more stable form of supply; in bulk.

Constant follow-up on the development plans of Manyama.

(5) Challenges on Relationship with Host Communities and Positions of Current homes

Challenges In Mayukwayukwa, traditional chiefs involved in the LI programme are not originally related to the scheme. This causes confusion among former refugees and host communities.

Former refugees, who do not have allocated plots, are living in the resettlement scheme.

Host communities are living in the south of Mayukwayukwa. Many DRC refugees are living in Block F in Meheba. Due to the change of criteria for Angolan former refugees, presently

occupied plots are allocated to other former refugees. Solutions Issues with traditional chiefs will be handled in a delicate manner as a

consideration for host communities. All current homes of former refugees will be recorded in the database

which manages progress of LI programme as mentioned below. Plots will then be allocated upon request by former refugees to avoid displacing them unnecessarily.

For the host communities, explanations and discussions will be carried out individually to encourage their involvement and participation.

The demarcation lines where DRC refugees are residing in the resettlement scheme can be adjusted after ensuring that there is enough space in the refugee settlement, for example.

(6) Existence of Vulnerable People

Challenges Existence of single elderly people and those who have been persecuted for ethnic differences

Support for vulnerable people among refugees will continue to be implemented by UNHCR. Presently, there is no support structure for vulnerable people amongst the former refugees. (The support programme implemented by the Zambian government is only for Zambians.)

Solutions Support in collaboration with NGOs and Ministry of Community Development at district level.

There must be enough implementation structures to take charge of the necessary measures for individual situations.

Identification of vulnerable people based on Zambian criteria shall be integrated into the database of former refugees as mentioned below. Support is implemented more efficiently if other donors and NGOS have access to this kind of information too.

6-4


6.1.3 Challenges on Project Management

(1) Unclear Progress of LI Programme

Challenges The actual progress of the LI Programme is not easily grasped by DOR, the implementation body.

Data concerning the progress of resettlement scheme has not been gathered in a methodical and organized manner; the recent creation of a database is undergoing.

Lack of Information reflecting clearly the legal status of former refugees who have been given plots. (DOR scheme officer confirms that some data is grasped, but not organized on paper.)

It is hardly possible to confirm if the former refugees, who have been given plots, are actually living on them.

LARIMS and GIS were put in place to manage the settlers’ information collectively with exclusively trained operators. However, the latter are not employed to manage the programme.

Solutions Management system, which can be used by DOR, shall be established and utilized according to the site conditions. It manages the progress of LI programme (resettlement scheme and legal transition) and the progress of construction. By sharing this kind of information with related organizations, the implementation structure can be more efficient.

It is necessary to confirm whether existing LARIMS can be utilized as management system as mentioned above.

(2) Procedures of Resettlement Scheme and Legal Transition

Challenges [Resettlement Scheme] Regarding the demarcation of plots for former refugees, the procedures are

not clear. Also, it is not clear whether requests from former refugees are considered. (In the interviews conducted with former refugees, it seems that most of their requests have not been taken into account. Little consideration has been given to vulnerable people, to the different situations between Zambians and former refugees, to household sizes, etc.)

It is not sure if the basic demarcation policy of LI programme is still being adopted in the actual practice. The policy recommends alternate plot allocation putting Zambian households alongside former refugees and to allocate plot size that corresponds to the number of men in the household. (No written documents to explain this aspect of the matter. According to some former refugees interviewed, these criteria were not applied in most cases.)

There is an example whereby several households were given the same plot.

There is also an example whereby the same member of a household has been different plots.

There are no chronological records of the resettlement procedures. Other examples of inconsistent practices include the issuing of “letters of occupancy”; some occupants have them and others not with no specific reasons to explain the delay etc.

Plot applications for plots are regulated by the implementation body (Suspension of application forms and in certain cases, some former refugees were dissuaded from plot application)

Many former refugees living on their allocated plots confirmed that they have not obtained their residence permits.

6-5


[Legal Transition] Angolan former refugees → temporary suspension of passports issuing

missions from Angolan authorities Rwandan former refugees → refusal to apply for passports

Solutions [Resettlement Scheme] Plots allocation records shall be properly managed. Requests from former

refugees should also be taken into consideration. Based on the database of settlers, the progress of LI programme will be

visualized by GIS. Data and special situations will also be considered for plot allocation.

Establishment of a system that manages the procedures of “collective” land plot allocation.

Preparation of a manual for allocation criteria [Legal transition] Angolan former refugees → During the period of the survey mission,

former refugees who show their intention to acquire residence permits are allowed to apply for land plots in the resettlement scheme.

Rwandan former refugees→ During the period of the survey mission, the Zambian government was in the process of granting a special exception for Rwandans to obtain temporary residence permits without their national passports. If this process were to come through, Rwandan former refugees, who have refused passport applications, will be allowed to apply for plots in resettlement scheme.

(3) Lack of Interactive Communication in the Plot Allocation System

Challenges Few target former refugees receive sufficient explanations concerning their plots and the surroundings.

In Meheba, some target former refugees have special preferences for certain blocks in the resettlement scheme.

Solution Target former refugees should be provided with more information (existing infrastructures, soil fertility etc) about their allocated plots to be reassured of the future in their new homes.

(4) Need to Reinforce the Capacity of the LI Implementation Personnel

Challenge Although Meheba and Mayukuwayukwa have been chosen for former refugees to resettle and to start farming activities, no special budget and nor human resources have been allocated to the implementation body for these two areas. The budgets for these two sites are the same as for other national resettlement schemes at DOR office.

It would not be easy for the DOR staff at provincial and site level to handle allocation of plots.

The role of leading LI implementation will shift from DOR to local governments when the percentage of target former refugees relocated to the resettlement scheme achieves 75%. However, as of now, no implementation structures in the local government have been appointed to oversee the development of Meheba and Mayukwayukwa.

Solution General layout plans can be formulated through the preparation of topographic maps (1/25,000) of Meheba and Mayukwayukwa; these would become the master plan synchronizing land allocation and facilities with the relocation of the target settlers. They would also help to identify infrastructures needing development in the near future with the required budget and personnel.

6-6


Involve local government in the LI implementation to establish implementing structure for the development of Meheba and Mayukwayukwa.

6.1.4 Insufficient Infrastructures

(1) Implementation Structures for Infrastructure Development in Resettlement Scheme

Challenge There is little infrastructure development in the resettlement scheme since the transfer of responsibilities from COR and UNHCR to DOR and UNDP.

There is also little support concerning the maintenance of existing infrastructures other than the constant support of field coordinators in the various ministries by UNHCR for refugees.

No IDPs (Integrated Development Plans) including Meheba and Mayukwayukwa were formulated in Kaoma and Kalumbila districts.

Progress of access road rehabilitation is not monitored. No allocation of budget for future infrastructure development in the resettlement

scheme. The 20.00 Million USD World Bank LI Support Programme (P152821WB) is still

awaiting final approval from the GRZ. Solutions Formulation of IDPs to incorporate future infrastructure development programme of

Meheba and Mayukwayukwa in the plans of Kaoma District and Kalumbila District. Close follow-up on the implementation status of P152821WB.

(2) Poor Accessibility to Infrastructures

Challenge Poor accessibility to basic infrastructures such as schools and boreholes Poor water quality provided at existing water points In Meheba, available water at existing points is not enough to be used for both daily

needs and farming. Solutions Many settlers consider that the infrastructures in the resettlement schemes are still

inferior to those in the refugee settlements. Target former refugees should be provided with more information concerning infrastructures surrounding their allocated plots. Information provided shall be based on general layout plans. These plans are formulated to present a layout of appropriate infrastructures to synchronize the supply of facilities with the relocation of the target settlers.

Removal of rust which is a possible cause of poor water quality through installing PVC pipe instead of steel pipes used for old water points. Survey and analysis to be conducted by the Ministry of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Education at district level.

Provide water for farming through future irrigation facilities development.

(3) Insufficient Housing Facilities

Challenge Well-being not assured as housing facilities are too small for the entire family in the resettlement scheme.

Insecurity of present homes due to absence of doors and windows. Need to secure housing facilities for vulnerable people

Solution Direct support for building individual houses by GRZ will not be feasible. Hence indirect support will have to be considered as an alternative. Lessons learn by past shelter projects implemented by Habitat for Humanity shall be put to good use for future support.

6-7


6.1.5 Difference of Meheba and Mayukwayuwa resettlement scheme from other resettlement schemes

(1) Peculiar Case of Meheba and Mayukwayukwa Resettlement Scheme

Relocation toresettlement scheme

Relocation to the allocated plots is required whereas relocation to other national resettlement schemes is voluntary apart from the displaced persons

Project Year LI programme implementation period had been set for two (2) years from 2014 to 2016 whereas implementation time span for other national resettlements lasts from 10 to more than 20 years.

Procedures Former refugees in the LI programme are constantly concerned with their legal transition and settling in the resettlement scheme whereas Zambians only focus on occupying their allocated plots with farming activities.

Target people Meheba and Mayukwayukwa resettlement schemes targeting Angolan and Rwandan former refugees and their Zambian hosts whereas target population for other national schemes only concerns Zambians

6-8


Rehabilitation Work of Water Points

Project Planning

Plot Allocation Map

Sharing of information with settlers concerning their allocated plots and the surroundings

Improvement of plot allocation system

Livelihood Enhancement

Project Management through Database and GIS

Involvement of host communities

Support by NGO and District Department of Community Development

Reinforcement of DOR implementation structures

Preparation of a Manual for plot allocation

Formulation of IDP with involvement at district level

Follow-up on the implementation status of WB projects

Follow-up on the Development Plan of Manyama

Imprecise Issues within the LI Framework

Lack of Demarcated

Anxiety after Relocation

Location Condition and Living Status of Former Refugees

Relationship with Host Community

Vulnerable People

Unclear Progress of LI Programme

Procedures of Resettlement Scheme and Legal Transition

Lack of Interactive Communication in the Plot Allocation System

Need to Reinforce the Capacity of the LI Implementation Personnel

Implementation Personnel for Infrastructure Development

Poor Accessibilities to Infrastructures

Insufficient Housing

Peculiar Case of Meheba and Mayukwayukwa Resettlement Scheme

Challenges on Project Implementation

Challenge on Project Management

Insufficient Infrastructures

Difference with other resettlement scheme

Countermeasure

6.2 Countermeasure for Challenges and Needs on LI Programme Implementation

(1) Countermeasure

6-9


(2) System for Promoting Relocation to Resettlement Scheme

The activities for the above-proposed system are as follows:

◆Preparation of Project Plan

・Proposal of a deadline (year of completion), project cost estimates, target construction work with annual work plan, demarcation and application of plots synchronized with facilities development in resettlement scheme, plan of relocation to allocated plots

・Preparation of facilities layout map and identification and construction of necessary infrastructures to meet national standards

・Scheduling land allocation with special consideration for the relocation of refugees residing in the resettlement scheme to the refugee settlement by making all the necessary adjustments.

・Ensure water for farming with development irrigation facilities.

◆Preparation of Ichnography of Demarcated Plots

・Preparation of Ichnography of demarcated plots for some parts of Meheba resettlement scheme to monitor and accelerate relocation.

◆Project Plan - Annual Work Plan - Facilities Layout Map - Project Cost Estimate

◆Ichnography of Demarcated Plots

◆Stake into the ground to identify the boundaries of demarcated plots

◆ Plot Offer and Application Procedures

◆Relocation to Allocated Plots

◆Issue of Land Title Deeds

◆Database

◆Formulation of IDP

◆Infrastructure Development

GIS

Project Management synchronizing database of former refugees and GIS map of demarcated/ allocated plots

Legal transition

LI Programme

Consideration for Target Former Refugees to reduce uneasiness to relocation to their new home

Preparation of Manual on Plot Allocation

Rehabilitation of Water Points

Livelihood Improvement

Relocation to Resettlement Scheme

6-10


◆Plot Offer and Application Procedures

・Plot offer and application procedures should abide to the general layout plan

・Synchronizing database of former refugees and GIS map of demarcated / allocated plots to facilitate appropriate plot allocation (taking note of their current homes and special needs if any)

・Preparation of plot allocation manual to ensure equality.

◆Sharing of Communication in the Plot Allocation System

・Target former refugees should be provided with more information concerning their allocated plots and the surroundings to lighten any uneasiness pertaining to the relocation to their new plots with facilities layout map.

・To communicate result of soil suitability survey to settlers.

・Sensitization of settlers on the different standards: between those in the refugee settlement, the resettlement scheme and the national standards.

◆Consideration for Target Former Refugees who are uneasy to relocate to their new homes

・Allocating plots in cluster-form as an alternative, may reassure many settlers who are unwilling to leave their familiar surroundings and neighbours etc.

・Land allocation considering their current home position.

Management system utilizing database and GIS

・Database mainly for former refugees is to be established. Progress of resettlement scheme and status of legal transition are to be linked to the same database.

・The current home address is to be reflected on the database, which will be used when allocation.

・Identification of vulnerable people based on national criteria will be integrated in the database, which will be used for support programmes.

・There is a need to confirm if the existing LARIMS can be utilized as a management system.

・By utilizing GIS, the progress of construction will be shared within DOR, to follow up on the progress on site. Sharing the accurate information with other related organizations will promote more efficient cooperation.

Implementation of livelihood support

・In the current circumstances, support project shall be implemented not so much as to improve livelihood but rather, to support livelihood to attain, at least, the standard of living at provincial level or that of host communities. Lessons learnt from past activities financed by other donors should also be applied to livelihood activities.

・As for the sale of farm crops, the priority is to stabilize income. Establishment of farmers’ groups will be considered to secure a more stable form of supply; in bulk.

6-11


Incorporation of infrastructure needs in the District IDP

・Required infrastructure in the LI programme shall be incorporated in the IDP prepared by the District Planning Office. Budget is to be secured at district level.

・The development of Meheba Resettlement Scheme, incorporated in the IDP, will be coherent with that of Manyama.

Infrastructure development

・According to the general layout plan, required infrastructures shall be timed to be constructed at an appropriate time.

・Adequate measures will be taken to improve water quality

・The exact causes of bad water quality of boreholes will be investigated in collaboration with the concerned authorities at district level. Appropriate measures will be taken to resolve the problems.

・The LI support programme to be financed by WB will be followed up accordingly.

Support from NGO and Community Development Department

・For vulnerable people, solutions shall be sought in collaboration with NGOs and District Community Development Department.

・Identification of vulnerable people will be reflected onto the database, to facilitate support programmes.

・Past lessons from various projects including by UN Habitat will be used as reference for formulating future assistance projects by NGO or GRZ.

Careful treatment of host communities including traditional chiefs

・For traditional chiefs, required measures shall be carried out delicately as a consideration for host communities during implementation period.

・Regarding the host communities residing in the resettlement scheme, explanations and discussions shall be carried out on an individual basis to encourage their positive involvement in the LI Programme

Improvement of DOR implementation system

・Measures for host communities who reside in resettlement scheme

・Measures to cater to vulnerable people in collaboration with NGOs and District Community Development Department

・Implementation to be more structured: by a general layout plan and preparation of annual work plan

・Measures to implement the appropriate allocation

・Careful treatment of traditional chiefs

・Integrate past lessons in project implementation Others ・Constant follow-up of Manyama development plan ・Constant follow-up on the progress of LI Support Programme to be financed by WB

6-12


6.3 Need to Reinforce the Capacity of the LI Implementation Personnel

(1) Involvement of Target Districts

The policy of decentralization has resulted in some concrete changes in the organisational structures at district level. However, as far as the LI Programme is concerned, very little involvement from the district authorities has been solicited. Hereafter, the participation of concerned district authorities will become vital as the LI Programme progresses. The reasons are as follows:

Implementation body of the resettlement scheme shall be transferred from DOR to district authorities when the progress rate has attained 75%.

The budget of the infrastructures in the resettlement scheme should be secured by the concerned district office. As of present, this procedure does not exist for both schemes. (Most of the infrastructures in the resettlement scheme has been maintained by UNHCR.)

LI programme is not incorporated in the IDP of concerned districts. Incidentally, the IDP for both districts does not exist.

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) of infrastructures in the resettlement scheme is to be implemented by the concerned district authorities.

Location and number of public social facilities (schools and health facilities) should be consistent with the district plan, which is not the present case.

(2) Necessity to Improve the Implementation System at Provincial Level

Regarding implementation structure of DOR, there is only one scheme officer in both schemes. To encourage relocation to resettlement scheme, the DOR office will be expected to conduct highly transparent and fair management when dealing appropriately and promptly with the various problems on site.

Other important activities to be handled by the DOR office at provincial and site level are as below:

Allocation of plots using the database to consider the status and requests of former refugees

Appropriate explanation to former refugees when offering plots

Take necessary measures for host communities residing in the resettlement scheme of Mayukwayukwa.

Take necessary measures for vulnerable people in collaboration with NGOs and District Community Development Department

Careful treatment of traditional chiefs

Follow-up on future support projects from lessons learnt during past projects

Establishment of a concrete implementation structure by block or zone and preparation of an annual work plan determined by project plan

7-1


Chapter 7 Feasible Cooperation Concepts

7.1 Suggestions for Conceivable Local Integration Support Plan

Findings from the study mission clearly show that inadequate planning in the overall implementation of the LI Programme is a major setback for its accomplishment. Hence, in our suggestion of feasible cooperation projects in the future, it is important to consider integrating to a certain degree, JICA’s support in the planning aspect of the LI Programme. The intensity of this involvement varies on the approach adopted. At this point in time, the types of feasible concepts suggested are as follows.

i. Programme of development for the resettlement scheme(s)

ii. Programme of intervention confined to specific selected areas

iii. Programme of intervention directed only to settlers who have moved to their allocated plots in the scheme including livelihood improvement and infrastructure development

Considering the challenges and needs described in Chapter 6, feasible cooperation will be proposed as follows.

(a) Project Implementation

Elaboration of Project Plan

Plot Offer and Application Procedures

(b) Project Management

Management System Utilizing Database and GIS

(c) Livelihood Enhancement Support

(d) Infrastructure Development

7.2 Project Implementation/Management Support

(1) Plan Elaboration Support

Project plan is vital to provide a firm basis for rational and consistent decisions-making for the project implementation. This plan consists of nomination of completion year, estimation of project costs, annual schedule of target construction work, demarcation and application of plots synchronizing facilities development in resettlement scheme, plan of relocation to allocated plots.

7-2


Figure 7.2.1 Image Map of Zoning

Table 7.2.1 Example of Project Plan

■ Process sheet for resettlement scheme

3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12 3 6 9 12

Z one A Z one B Z one C, D Z one E


Z one A L=30k m Z one B L=30k m Z one C, D L=60k m Z one E L=30k m

Z one A 30e . a . Z one B 30e . a . Z one C, D 60e . a . Z one E 30e . a .

Upg r a de Ja cob Mpepo Upg r a de S h i ba ng a Upg r a de Lymuna l e

Upg r a de Dr . Dom i nc M i nv o i Upg r a de S h i ba ng a 2 New cons t r uc t i on



2.Construction

2021 2022

For Borehole

3.Survey for Demacation

4.Invite for Allocation

2019 2020

Remarks

For Feeder road

For Borehole

For School Construction

For Health Facility

5.Allocation

For Health Facility

7.Confirmation of Move to Each Plot

6.Move to Each plot

2018

1.Procurement

For School Construction

Item

For Feeder road

*If the project duration is assumed to be 5 years, construction works for infrastructures, allocation and relocation of residents to assigned will be implemented in 2 years for each block.

7-3


(a) Preparation of facilities layout map provides a visual representation of main infrastructures on site. It ensures rational planning of appropriate development for each target area.

(b) Scheduling land allocation with special consideration for the relocation of refugees residing in the resettlement scheme to the refugee settlement by making all the necessary adjustments.

(c) Ensure water for farming with development of irrigation facilities.

(2) Plot Offer and Application Procedures

<Explanation on Plot Allocation>

(a) Plot offer and application procedures in accordance with layout of infrastructures existing in resettlement scheme through GIS map.

(b) To communicate result of soil suitability survey to settlers.

(c) The figure below shows image of GIS map.

Figure 7.2.2 Image of GIS Map

< Plot Allocation System>

(a) Synchronizing database of former refugees and GIS map of demarcated / allocated plots to facilitate appropriate plot allocation as per current their home place and special needs if any.

7-4


(b) Preparation of plot allocation manual.

< Consideration for Target Former Refugees Who are Uneasy to Relocate to Their New Homes >

The possibility of allocating plots which allows settlers to live in <clusters>, namely in close vicinity without damaging the existing social ties is under consideration.

Following shows the current plots allocation and possible allocation system to enable <cluster-form>.

Figure 7.2.3 Image of Current Plots Allocation (Left) and Possible Allocation (Right)

(3) Progress Management by Database and GIS

1) Establishment of Database

(a) The database should include not only information of potential target settlers (former refugees and Zambians), but also gathers all information pertaining to the land plot status of each household, managed by DOR (plot application status, plot number, land ownership) and its legal status, managed by COR (possession of alien card, passport and residence permits etc). Appropriate measures can only be taken effectively if all this information is centralised. Double allocation, often a source of tension between settlers, can also be avoided.

(b) Plots number of settlers living in their allocated land will be integrated on the plot allocation map which will also be linked to the database.

(c) Identification of vulnerable people also shall be through database.

(d) Currently, DOR is in the process of installing the LARIMUS (Land Resettlement Information System Management). This system shall be utilized efficiently.

No.200 No.202 No.201

No.251 No.250 No.252

No.203

No.249

No.199

No.300 No.301 No.302 No.303

No.253

No.299

Borehole

Feeder Road

Individual

Residential Place and

Cultivation Area

No.200 No.202 No.201 No.203

No.249

No.199

No.300 No.301 No.302 No.303

No.253

No.299

No.251 No.250 No.252

Borehole

Feeder Road

Common Cultivation Area

Residential Area

7-5


Figure 7.2.4 Database Image of Target Residents in LI Programme

2) Centralised Data Management System Incorporating “Database” and “GIS”

(a) Information management system will be established by using “Database” and “GIS”, which can grasp both the status of Resettlement Scheme and legal transition, the two major pillar of LI programme.

The plot allocation map reflecting the status of each plot can be visualised via the database. Contents including the household’s nationality, date relocation and land status can be obtained within a glance. Likewise, with a click on a plot, the legal status of the concerned household members will also be revealed.

Allocation Map

Figure 7.2.5 Image of Management of Information System (MIS)

①Information of residents

②Map information

Resettlement Scheme

Legal transition

Database Image of Target Residents in LI ProgrammeDatabase Image of Target Residents in LI Programme

7-6


Figure 7.2.6 Image of Status of Plots using GIS

3) Progress Management by GIS

Progress rate can be followed up easily if GIS input of constructed infrastructures is available. Upon completion of infrastructures, relocation of settlers to the concerned area can be done accordingly.

Figure 7.2.7 Image of Progress Management on GIS

7-7


7.3 Livelihood Improvement Support

7.3.1 Contents of the Project

Expected results for livelihood enhancement measures are as follows.

A) Elaboration of Land Use Plan(s)

B) Implementation of Agricultural Activities

C) Expansion of extension services

D) Higher Income and Community Development through Common Activities

To achieve these results, important points to be integrated in the support programmes are as follows:

(1) Elaboration of Land Use Plan

1) Identification of Natural Resources and Human Resources

i) Natural Resources

Firstly, identification of water resources such as springs, small rivers is to be carried out. Groundwater level also has to be verified. Distance between resettlement schemes and natural sources of water have to be calculated. All these elements are important for farming during the dry season. There is also a need to estimate the volume of natural water available when there is a shortage of water.

ii) Human resources

An evaluation of human resources existing in the field is important to identify experienced and knowledgeable famers who have been previously trained by NGO or extension workers. This would permit introducing feasible activities for farmers and in their new farms.

2) Assessment of Market Needs

i) Survey of Neighbouring Markets

Survey of markets including those in the resettlement scheme, are to be conducted to identify the market demand. Highly demanded crops and market price determination factors will be listed up.

ii) Survey of Demand from Other Sources

Other sources of demand such as starch fabrication companies and boarding schools will also be surveyed. Crop demand volume will be calculated on a monthly basis to take into account of its significant decrease during the school holidays.

3) Identification of Seasonal Crops

i) Identification of Crops to be Cultivated during the Rainy Season

Maize and cassava are the main staple food crops during the rainy season. Beans and other alternative crops demanded by markets will also be introduced. Fruit farming will be also encouraged for an effective utilization of farm land.

7-8


ii) Identification of Crops to be Cultivated during the Dry Season

Water resources are vital for farming activities during the dry season. The choice of cash crops to be cultivated will be very important. It will be made based on market demand and with the participation of extension workers and experienced farmers.

4) Establishment of Land Use Plan

i) Identification of crops to be cultivated

Once the crops to be cultivated and time span are identified, the farming area will be determined considering the rotation shifts and the capacity to labour and reap.

ii) Proposition of alternative farming activities

Besides crop cultivation, other alternative farming activities like fruit cultivation, beekeeping, poultry and aquaculture will be considered. For livestock-keeping, it is necessary to consider several factors like area sufficiency and availability of fences and barns.

iii) Elaboration of Land Use Plans

Plans for farming activities and alternative activities will be prepared. A land use plan will be elaborated taking into consideration the location of houses and stock depots.

(2) Implementation of Agricultural Activities

1) Securing Agricultural Materials

i) Seeds and Fertilizer

For the first farming season on the new farms in the resettlement schemes, seeds and fertilizers are needed. If these materials are provided, it is important to ensure sustainability. For example, after the first harvest, the beneficiaries will return the same amount of seeds and fertilizers, to be passed on to new settlers farming for the first time on their fields.

ii) Farming Tools

Since the major activity in the refugee settlements has always been agriculture, it can be assumed that farmers possess their personal tools for farming. However, if this is not the case, tools supplied will be recycled in the same manner as the seeds and fertilizers as described above to ensure sustainability.

2) Creation of Farming Associations

i) Participants and Division of Roles

Where water resources can be secured, irrigation systems will be set up to reinforce certain farming activities. Maintenance of these facilities will be shared by the beneficiaries. Therefore, it is important to determine the facilities required and to define the responsibilities of each beneficiary.

ii) Sustainable Maintenance of Other Facilities

Likewise, associations will also be formed to maintain canals and ponds and to carry out livestock-keeping activities in a sustainable manner.

7-9


(3) Expansion of Extension Services

1) Establishment of Extension Structure

i) Utilizing Human Resources

Experienced farmers will be needed to carry out activities noted in (1)-1)-2. It will be important the promote networking of extension services. Basically, regular exchange of information between extension workers, experienced farmers and farmers in general, is important.

ii) Utilizing Demonstration Farm

For extension services, existing farms of experienced farmers can be used as demonstration farms. Should this not be possible, demonstration farms used by extension and field workers can also be used.

(4) Higher Income and Community Development through Common Activities

1) Activities on Site

i) Activity in Common Fields

Areas which are not suitable for housing purposes, such as lowlands, should be used as common fields for farming activities. Irrigation canals and furrows, set up in these common fields will have to be maintained by all beneficiaries.

ii) Implementation of Activities

Before the installation of farming facilities, experienced farmers can be identified to provide technical support. As for the maintenance of non-common facilities, there are no fixed rules as to whether this should be done individually or on a group basis. Nevertheless, the latter is highly recommended for the sake of promoting community development.

iii) Bulk supply

Presently, most crops are supplied and transported in small quantities, on an individual basis. This practice limits price regulation power. Thus, it is necessary to promote bulk supply and improve access conditions to vibrant markets. Grouped supply is also an important form of group activity that promotes community development.

iv) Other Non-farming Activities

Training for non-farming activities like carpentry, tailoring, masonry and welding works are to be offered if necessary. Reinforced training can be provided to candidates who benefited training by Caritas, or new applicants.

(5) Implementation Bodies

Line ministries at district level:

Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Community Development and Social Service, Department of Planning

7-10


7.3.2 Existing JICA Cooperation Projects and Available Output

Table 7.3.1 provides a list of projects financed and or programmed by JICA in the agriculture sector and the expected output.

Table 7.3.1 Expected Output of JICA Projects

Project Target areas Activities Expected output for future cooperation

Remarks

T-COBSI Northern province Luapula province Muchinga province

Small irrigation (rain-fed area)

Available natural resource identification

Technical transfer on horticultural crops production technique

Operation and maintenance of irrigation facilities

Ability to identify available resources to cope directly and indirectly with limited production in resettlement schemes

Knowledge on Water management

Need for irrigation system is confirmed for both in Meheba and in Mayukwayukwa. Due to limited accessibility to water resources, micro irrigation is a useful alternative method for the resettlement schemes.

E-COBSI Copperbelt province North western province Central province Luapula province Northern province Muchinga province

Small irrigation Irrigation farm

management of small-scale farm holds

Marketing Community based

irrigation farming

Possible Installment of irrigation facilities in resettlement scheme

RDP (current rice cultivation area) North western province Luapula province Muchinga province

(new rice cultivation area) Copperbelt province Eastern province Lusaka

Support for extension of rice cultivation technique

Diversification of crop production to avoid maize-dependent production

Technical transfer of NERICA cultivation

Angolan and Rwandan former refugees, Zambian hosts, Burundi refugees have strong willingness to cultivate rice

Some Rwandan and Angolan former refugees and their Zambian hosts have already started rice cultivation.

Demonstration rice farms exist in the resettlement scheme of Mayukwayukwa.

RESCAP North western province Lusaka Western province

Identification of suitable techniques for small-scale farmers

Reinforcement of monitoring on extension services

Improvement of access to extension services

Training on livelihood improvement

Some extension staff utilize Agricultural Diaries. Extension Officers trained under this project can disseminate their knowledge obtained.

FoDiS Eastern province Lusaka Southern province Western province

Diversification of food crops

Variety selection of cassava and sweet potatoes

Introduction of crops to be produced in rain-fed area

Textbooks on cultivation techniques on main food crops can be utilized, it is also helpful for income generation considering high demands on cassava processing.

The cassava production in Kalumbila District and Kaoma District have been identified by starch processing companies.

*T-COBSI; Technical Cooperation Project on Community-based Smallholder Irrigation (2013～2017), RDP: Rice Development Project (2015-2019), RESCAP: Rural Extension Services Capacity Advancement Project -Through PaViDIA Approach- (2009-2014), FoDiS: Food Crop Diversification Support Project (2006-2011)

7-11


7.3.3 Important points to recall for the implementation of future projects

(1) Common points between both sites

Water resources are necessary for most of the activities described above. Therefore, first and foremost, the identification of natural resources and eventually experienced farmers is a must. Activities can then be implemented voluntarily using the identified resources.

It is highly possible that social ties between communities be strengthened once the concerned households move to the resettlement site. Hence, activities promoting community development should be prioritised in the conception of future projects.

(2) Special point for Mayukwayukwa

Given the sandy soil that occupies 70% of the resettlement area, to ensure a certain level of livelihood, settlers are recommended to grow cassava and maize for personal consumption. Currently, excellent varieties producing high yield within short growing periods, have been introduced. Nevertheless, for those farmers with no access to farming inputs, maintaining seed of local traditional varieties should also be necessary.

7.4 Infrastructure Development Support

7.4.1 Contents of Support

(1) Meheba

1) Relevance of Proposed Infrastructures

A general development plan for Meheba does not exist presently. Plots are demarcated only in some parts of Block F, H and G. Required infrastructures in the resettlement scheme are deducted from the total quantity of infrastructures needed expressed by DOR. The relevance of the infrastructures requested in the education, health and water sectors, are examined in the following manner.

i) School Facilities

A school should be situated within a radius of 5km from other schools. Presently, there are six primary schools in the resettlement scheme. No plans have been made to increase this number although the resettlement is only partially demarcated for the time being. The accessibility to primary schools is shown as follows.

* the area indicated is within the resettlement scheme as of now.

7-12


Figure 7.4.1 Accessibility to School Facilities in Meheba

5km

Block H Centre 5 Community School

Block E Community School

Meheba H (Kamiba) Primary School


Block G Community School

Meheba F Primary School

Meheba A Primary School

Meheba C Primary School

Meheba D Primary School

Block C Road 29 Community School

Meheba B Primary School

7-13


As shown in the figure above, it will be difficult to cover the entire resettlement scheme with just 6 schools in the future. Taking into consideration that a few of the existing facilities are in a rather bad state, the need for school facilities is summarized as follows.

Figure 7.4.2 Development Plan of School Facilities in Meheba

Block H Centre 5 Community School : Abolition of existing facility and new construction

Block E Community School : Abolition of existing facility and new construction

Meheba H (Kamiba) Primary School : Using existing facility

Block H Centre 4 Community School: Abolition

Block G Community School : Abolition of existing facility and new construction

Meheba F Primary School : Using existing facility

New Primary School

New Primary School

New Primary School

New Primary School

5km

7-14


Table 7.4.1 Overview of Existing School Facilities

School Facilities Outline Development Plan Meheba F Primary School

- 2 1x4 Classroom Building - 2 1x3 Classroom Building - 7 Staff Houses - 1 Staff House - 4 Toilets

Existing facilities will be used with maintenance.

Meheba H (Kamiba) Primary School

- 1x4 Classroom Building - 1x3 Classroom Building - 1x2 Classroom Building - 3 Staff Houses - 5 Toilets

Existing facilities will be used due to lack of classrooms.

Block E Community School

- 1x3 Classroom Building - 6 Toilets

The current position is not within a radius of 5 km from Block E. The existing building is deteriorating and the facilities are not adapted for a primary school. Hence, the current facilities should be abolished, and a new primary school should be in a new location that should be within a radius of 5km from Block E.

Block G Community School


The current position is not within a radius of 5 km from Block G. The existing building is deteriorating and the facilities are not adapted for a primary school. Hence, the current facilities should be abolished, and a new primary school should be in a new location that should be within a radius of 5km from Block G.



It is close to Meheba H Primary School, and it is within same radius range as that of Meheba H Primary School. The existing building is deteriorating and the facilities are not adapted for a primary school. Considering above, the current facilities should be abolished



The current position is not within a radius of 5 km from the west end of Block H. The existing building is deteriorating and the facilities are not adapted for a primary school. Hence, the current facilities should be abolished, and a new primary school should be in a new location that should be within a radius of 5km from the west end of Block H.

In addition to the above schools, 5 Primary Schools should be established to cover the entire scheme within a radius of 5km.

Existing schools: 2 (Meheba F, Meheba H)

Schools to be relocated : 3

New schools: 4

In total, 9 Primary School are required.

7-15


ii) Health Facilities

The catchment population for health facilities in Zambia are defined as below.

i. A Health Post To be established for a catchment population of 500 households (3,500

people) in rural area, 1,000 households (7,000 people) in urban area

Or within a 5 Km radius for sparsely populated areas.

ii. Urban Health Centres To be established for a catchment population of 30,000 to 50,000 people in

urban area

iii. Rural Health Centres To be established for a catchment population of 10,000 people or within a

29km radius in rural area

iv. A Level-1 Hospital Catchment population is from 80,000 to 200,000 (to manage referrals from

health centres)

At least one establishment per district

v. Level-2 Hospitals Catchment population is from 200,000 to 800,000(to manage referrals

from first level hospitals)

Provide technical support and training and form the base for provincial

mobile health services.

vi. Level-3 Hospitals Catchment population is more than 800,000 (to manage referrals from

second level hospitals)

Also provide training and research

Based on the above-mentioned criteria, assuming that the average household size in the resettlement scheme in Meheba is 7, the approximate catchment population is 6,000 households x 7 = 42,000. The size of health facilities are summarized as follows.

i. A Health Post 60,000 / 500 = 12 units (or 9 units within a radius of 5km)

ii. Urban Health Centers N/A

iii. Rural Health Centers 42,000 / 10,000 = 4.2 ≒ 5 units (or 1 unit within a radius of 29km)

iv. A Level-1 Hospital N/A

v. Level-2 Hospital N/A

vi. Level-3 Hospital N/A

7-16


Figure 7.4.3 Accessibility to Health Facilities in Meheba

Presently, there 3 health centres in the resettlement scheme ; Clinic G, Clinic H (Kamiba Clinic) and Clinic F. If the criteria for a rural area with low population density were to be used, 1 health centre and 9 health posts are required in total. As there are three existing health centres, there will be a need to construct 6 new health centres.

5km

Clinic D

Jagaimo

Clinic B

Clinic A

Clinic G (Hope Clinic)

Clinic H (Kamiba Clinic)

Clinic F

7-17


Figure 7.4.4 Development Plan of Health Facilities in Meheba

Clinic D

Jagaimo

Clinic B

Clinic A

Clinic G (Hope Clinic)

Clinic H (Kamiba Clinic)

Clinic F

7-18


iii) Water Supply Facilities (Boreholes)

As for the construction of boreholes in Zambia, the catchment population per borehole is 250 habitants.

The number of planned boreholes is 634.

The catchment population can be estimated to be: 634 x 250 = 158,000.

If the average household size in Meheba is estimated to be 7, the population estimated for the resettlement scheme will be 42,000. Hence, the number of existing boreholes are largely sufficient to cover the actual catchment population even if the number of personnel working on the site were to be added.

2) Road Construction Component

i) Within the Resettlement Scheme

The total distance of roads needed to be constructed is estimated to be 500 km by DOR. Out of this figure, 110 km has been rehabilitated by Zambia National Service with the support of UNHCR. Hence, rehabilitation of 390 km is still needed.

The roads in of rehabilitation works are categorized as feeder roads. The standard cross section of a feeder road in Zambia is as follows:

- Standard width: 5.5 m

- Pavement: Gravel (t = 150 mm)

Figure 7.4.5 Standard Cross Section of a Feeder Road (RDA)

7-19


Table 7.4.2 Situation of Roads Needing Rehabilitation in the Resettlement Scheme

Item Details Unit Qty.

Remarks Plan (Assumption)

Constructed /Planned

Support

Rehabilitation of roads within the resettlement scheme

Access road W=5.5 m Gravel pavement (feeder road)

km 500 110 390 * In the P152821WB, 150 km of construction was recorded.

ii) Outside of Resettlement Scheme

a. Manyama Access Feeder Road

This road passes northwest from Block E to Manyama which is located along T5. The length is about 30 km. The development of this road will facilitate accessibility to the Manyama market. Selling in this market will, in turn will probably provide a possible source of income for the settlers in the resettlement scheme. Furthermore, the development of this road will also facilitate easier access to the Lumwana District Hospital. The width of this road will be 5.5 m as per standard cross section.

b. Construction of culvert boxes along Manyama Access Feeder Road (L=10 m)

The construction of culvert boxes will be needed at the junction where the feeder road meets the river. To be cost-effective, triple culvert boxes will be needed taking into account the topography of the site.

Figure 7.4.6 Cross Section of Triple Box Culverts

■ Triple Box Culverts L=10 m

7-20


c. M8 Access Feeder Road

This road passes from Block H southwards towards M8 located along the east side of Meheba. The development of this road will facilitate access to the south of the resettlement scheme and towards the host communities. The width is 5.5 m as per standard cross section.

d. Construction of Bridge along M8 Access Feeder Road

A river is found at the beginning of M8 access feeder road. To be cost-effective, a 20 metre-long bridge is needed right at the river crossing section considering the topography on site.

An important point is to be noted: the ground level within the resettlement site in block H is higher than that outside the scheme. Apparently, the areas outside the scheme are often flooded during the rainy season. Hence, it is the level of water is expected to rise significantly and the determination of the length of the bridge to be constructed (position of abutment) should take this into consideration.

Figure 7.4.7 Cross Section of Bridge (L=20 m)

■ R.C.C Bridge L=20 m

7-21


Figure 7.4.8 Location Map of Concerned Road

Table 7.4.3 Roads Situated on the Outside of the Resettlement Scheme Needing Rehabilitation

Item Details Unit Qty.

Remarks Constructed Support Total

Manyama Access Feeder Road

Access road from Block E to Manyama W=5.5 m (Feeder Road)

km 0 30 30 * In the P152821WB, 170 km of construction was recorded.

M8 Access Road

Access feeder road from Block H to M8 W=5.5 m

km 0 50 50

Bridge 1 L= 20 m Unit 0 1 1 *It was recorded in the P152821WB.

Bridge 2 (Box Culvert)

L= 10 m Unit 0 1 1

3) Components – School Facilities

In the resettlement scheme, the development of 6 Primary Schools is planned by DOR. If the 5km radius were to be used as base of calculation, 2 existing schools will be used, 4 existing schools will be relocated and 3 new schools will have to be constructed. In total, there is a need to construct 9 Primary Schools.

For the construction of new primary schools, the basic layout plans are as follows. These plans were obtained from the School Infrastructure Department of MGE (in Lusaka) and confirmed by the Building Officer of Kaoma District Education Board.

・Classrooms : 13 (1x3 Classroom Building 3、1x2 Classroom Building 2)

・Staff House: 6

・Toilet: 8

Route of Access Road assumed by P152821WB

Manyama Access Feeder Road L=30km

M8 Access Feeder Road L= 50km

Bridge (L=20m) is required at the border of the settlement【Bridge 1】

Box culverts (L-10km) are required at the border of the settlement【Bridge 2】

7-22


Figure 7.4.9 Standard Layout Plan of a Primary School (MGE)

Table 7.4.4 Estimation of Construction Costs of a Primary School

Item Unit Unit

(US$)

In the Case of Single Support Remarks

Qty. Construction Cost

(US$) Primary School

1x3 Classroom Building Facility 65,000 3 195,000

1x2 Classroom Building Facility 50,000 2 100,000

Staff Houses Facility 35,000 6 210,000

Toilets Facility 5,000 8 40,000

Other costs (50% of the total cost)

set of facilities

272,500 1 272,500

Total 817,500

7-23


Figure 7.4.10 Standard Floor Plan of 1x2 Classroom Block (MGE)

Figure 7.4.11 Standard Side View of 1x2 Classroom Block (MGE)

7-24


Figure 7.4.12 Stanard Floor Plan of 1x3 Classroom Block (MGE)

Figure 7.4.13 Standard Side View of 1x3 Classroom Block (MGE)

7-25


Figure 7.4.14 Standard Layout Plan of a Staff House (MGE)

Figure 7.4.15 Standard Side View of Staff House (MGE)

7-26


Figure 7.4.16 Standard Layout Plan of Toilets (MGE)

i) Meheba F Primary School

Rehabilitation works have been requested for the existing facilities by the field coordinator from MGE due to their poor current state.

Table 7.4.5 Situation of Meheba F Primary School

Item Detail Unit Qty.

Remarks Existing/ Constructed

Support Total

Meheba F Primary School

Rehabilitation works

Set of facilities

0 1 1 *It was recorded in the P152821WB.

ii) Meheba H (Kamiba) Primary School

The existing Primary School consists of several facilities constructed with the funds from UNHCR. Some facilities are insufficient compared to the basic model of a Primary School. Hence these targets should be taken into account for future support programme.

Table 7.4.6 Situation of Meheba H Primary School



Support Total

Meheba H Primary School

1x3 Classroom Building

Unit 1 2 3


Unit 1 1 2 *1 building was recorded in the P152821WB.

7-27




Support Total

Staff House Unit 3 3 6 *3 buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Toilet Unit 6 2 8

iii) Situation of other primary schools

Some of the facilities have been included in the programme to be funded by World Bank, many needs for reconstruction still exist.

a) Block E Community School

Table 7.4.7 Situation of Block E Community School


Remarks Existing Replacement

Meheba E Primary School


Unit 1 3


Unit 0

2 *3 buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff Houses Unit 0 6 *5 new buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Toilet Unit 4 8

b) Block G Community School

Table 7.4.8 Situation of Block G Community School



Meheba G Primary School


Unit 1 3


Unit 0 2 *3 buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House Unit 0 6 *5 new buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Toilet Unit 4 8

c) Block H Centre 4 Community School

Table 7.4.9 Situation of Block H Centre 4 Community School





Unit 1 3


Unit 0 2 *2 buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House Unit 0 6 *5 new buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Toilet Unit 2 8

7-28


d) Block H Centre 5 Community School

Table 7.4.10 Situation of Block H Centre 5 Community School





Unit 1 3 *The existing facility was too old, and thus it was abolished.


Unit 0 2

Staff House Unit 0 6 Toilet Unit 0 8

e) Needs - 9 Primary Schools in the resettlement scheme

Table 7.4.11 Situation of 9 Primary Schools

Item Unit

Qty.

Remarks

Maintenance Replacement New Constructio

n 4

Total Block F

Block H

Block E

Block G

Centre 4

Centre 5


Unit - 2 3 3 3 3 12 26


Unit - 1 2 2 2 2 8 17 *9 buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House Unit - 3 6 6 6 6 24 51 *18 buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

Toilet Unit - 2 8 8 8 8 32 66 *Renovation is necessary for Block F.

4) Components - Health Facilities

In the resettlement scheme, the construction of 6 Health Posts is planned by DOR. However, based on the national criteria standards, it is necessary to build 6 new health posts using 3 existing health centres. The three existing health centres, Clinic G, Clinic H (Kamiba Clinic) and Clinic F, are located in the resettlement scheme.

i) Clinic G

This clinic is a health centre. In the P152821WB assessed by UNHCR, no required facilities were recorded.

ii) Clinic H (Kamiba Clinic)

This clinic is also a health centre. The construction of certain facilities has been taken into account by the World Bank programme.

7-29


Table 7.4.12 Situation of Clinic H



Support Total

Clinic H Staff House inclusive of Cooking Shelter and Toilet/Bathing Block

Unit 2 3 5 *2 buildings were recorded in the P152821WB.

iii) Clinic F

The construction works for this clinic have not been completed. Hence this clinic is not operational. No intervention has been foreseen by World Bank for this clinic.

iv) Contents - 3 Health Facilities

Table 7.4.13 Situation of 3 Health Facilities

Item Unit Qty.

Remarks Clinic G Clinic H Clinic F Total

Staff House Unit 3 3 *Other than those above, 6 new health posts are necessary.

7-30


≪Reference: Typical Drawings of a Health Post≫ Source: MOH

Figure 7.4.17 Standard Plan and Section of Health Post TYPE I

Figure 7.4.18 Standard Side View Plan of Health Post TYPE I

7-31


Figure 7.4.19 Standard Plan and Side View Plan of Health Post TYPE II

Figure 7.4.20 Standard Side View Plan of a Health Post TYPE II

≪Reference: Standard Drawings of Health Centre≫ Source: MOH

7-32


Figure 7.4.21 Standard Layout Plan of Health Centre

Figure 7.4.22 Plan and Elevation of Health Centre (OPD Block)

7-33


Figure 7.4.23 Plan and Elevation of Health Centre (IN PATIENT Block)

Figure 7.4.24 Plan and Elevation of Health Centre (STORES, LAUNDRY)

7-34


Figure 7.4.25 Health Centre (INCINERATOR)

Figure 7.4.26 Plan and Elevation of Health Centre (SINGLE UNIT VIP TOILET)

7-35


5) Components – Water Supply Facilities

Presently, 105 boreholes were installed.

Table 7.4.14 Situation of Water Supply Facilities

Item Unit Qty.


Support Total

Borehole Point 105 529 634 *250 boreholes were recorded in the P152821WB.

Figure 7.4.27 Standard Cross Section of Boreholes (JICA CDCD Project)

6) Summary

i) Within Resettlement Scheme

Table 7.4.15 Summary of Target Items (within the Resettlement Scheme)

Item Unit Qty.

Planned by P152821WB

Support (except WB) Constructed Support Total

1. Road (Roads in Resettlement Scheme 500km) Roads in Resettlement Scheme (W=5.5m)

km 117 383 500 150 233

2. Educational Facilities (10 Primary School: 2 Maintenance, 4 Replacement, 4 New Construction) 1x3 Classroom Building Unit 1 23 24 23

1x2 Classroom Building Unit 1 15 16 9 6

Staff House Unit 3 45 48 18 27

Toilet Unit 6 53 59 53

Block F Primary School Renovation

Unit 0 1 1 1 0

3. Health Facilities (9 Health Facilities: 3 Partial Maintenance, 6 New Construction) Health Post Unit 0 6 6 2 4

Staff House (Maintenance of Clinic H)

Unit 2 3 5 3 0

4. Water Supply Facilities (634 Boreholes) Borehole Unit 105 529 634 250 279

※1) Primary School ※2) Health Centre

7-36


Table 7.4.16 Summary of Target Items by Block (within the Resettlement Scheme)

Item Unit Qty.



1. Road (Roads in Resettlement Scheme 500km) Roads in Resettlement Scheme (W=5.5m)

km 500 117 383 150 233

Block E km 70 10 60 25 35 Block F km 95 43 52 20 32 Block G km 105 10 95 35 60 Block H km 230 54 176 70 106

2. Educational Facilities (9 Primary Schools: 2 Maintenance, 3 Replacement, 4 New Construction) Block E (1 Replacement)




Toilet Unit 8 0 8 0 8

Block F (1 Maintenance, 1 New Construction)



Staff Houses Unit 6 0 6 0 6

Toilets Unit 8 0 8 0 8


Set of facilities

1 0 1 1 0

Block G (1 Replacement, 1 New Construction)





Block H (1 Maintenance, 1 Replacement, 2 New Construction, 1 Abolition)





Total






Set of facilities

1 0 1 1 0

3. Health Facilities (9 Health Facilities: 3 Partial Maintenance, 6 New Construction) Block E (1 New Construction)

Health Post Set of facilities

1 0 1 1 0

Block F (1 Existing Facility, 1 New Construction)


2 1 1 1 0

Block G (1 Existing Facility, 1 New Construction)


2 1 1 0 1

Block H (1 Maintenance, 3 New Construction)

Health Post (including Clinic H)

Set of facilities

4 1 3 0 3

Staff Houses (Maintenance of Clinic H)

Unit 5 2 3 3 0

Health Posts (including Clinic H)

Set of facilities

9 3 6 2 4

7-37


Item Unit Qty.



Staff Houses (Maintenance of Clinic H)

Unit 5 2 3 3 0

4. Water Supply Facilities (634Boreholes) Borehole Unit 634 105 529 250 279 Block E Unit 91 0 91 35 56 Block F Unit 117 50 67 50 17 Block G Unit 134 20 114 50 64 Block H Unit 292 35 257 115 142

* The quantity of each Block was assumed by proportional division of the Block area.


Table 7.4.17 Summary of Target Items (situated outside the resettlement scheme)

Item Unit Qty. Planned by

P152821WB

Support (except WB)

Remarks

1. Road Manyama Access Road (W=5.5m) km 30 70 0 M8 Access Road (W=5.5m) km 50 40 10 Appropriated

the surplus in the upper row

2. Bridge Bridge 1(L=20m) Unit 1 1 0

Bridge 2 (Box culvert L=10m) Unit 1 1

7) Estimation of Construction Cost


Table 7.4.18 Estimation of Construction Cost (within Resettlement Scheme)

Item Unit Unit Price (US$)

In the Case of Single Support

Except P152821WB

Qty. Construction

Cost (US$)

Qty. Construction

Cost (US$)

1. Road (Roads within Resettlement Scheme 500km) Roads within Resettlement Scheme (W=5.5m)

km 25,000 383 9,575,000 233 5,825,000

Sub Total 9,575,000 5,825,000 2. Educational Facilities (9 Primary Schools)

1x3 Classroom Building Unit 65,000 23 1,495,000 23 1,495,000

1x2 Classroom Building Unit 50,000 15 750,000 6 300,000

Staff House Unit 35,000 45 1,575,000 27 945,000

Toilet Unit 5,000 53 265,000 53 265,000


Set of facility

50,000 1 50,000 0 0

Sub Total 4,135,000 3,005,000 3. Health Facilities (9 Facilities)

Health Post Set of facility

70,000 6 420,000 4 280,000

Staff House (Maintenance of Clinic F)

Unit 39,185 3 117,555 0 0

Sub Total 537,555 280,000 4. Water Supply Facilities

Borehole Unit 4,000 529 2,116,000 279 1,116,000 Sub Total 2,116,000 1,116,000 Total 16,363,555 10,226,000

7-38


*Unit price is based on “LI Infrastructure needs assessment – UNHCR”


Table 7.4.19 Estimation of Construction Cost (Outside of Resettlement Scheme)

Item Unit Unit Price

(US$)


Except P152821WB Remar

ks Qty.

Construction Cost (US$)

Qty. Constructio

n Cost (US$)

1. Road Manyama Access Road (W=5.5m) Km 30,000 30 900,000 0 0 M8 Access Road (W=5.5m) Km 30,000 50 1,500,000 10 300,000 Sub Total 2,400,000 300,000

2. Bridge

Bridge 1 (L=20m) Unit 1,350,000 1 1,350,000 0 0

Bridge 2 (Box culvert L=10m) Unit 50,000 1 50,000 1 50,000

Sub Total 1,400,000 50,000

Total 3,800,000 350,000

*Unit price is based on “LI Infrastructure needs assessment – UNHCR”

8) Prioritization of Identified Infrastructures

Identified infrastructures are prioritized based on the following evaluation criteria. Points are awarded to each facility by evaluating its direct impact on the settlers, its current status and its impact on the surrounding areas.

The intervention programme from World Bank (WB) is still in the process of being finalized. To avoid duplicated efforts, the facilities identified in the WB project have been eliminated from the identified facilities taken into account by this study.

≪Evaluation Items≫

A. Direct impact on the resettlement population

① encourage relocation to the allocated plot

② generate income

③ be advantageous to host communities

B. Current status

④ identified target facility for WB project

⑤ identified target facility in the prioritised blocks

C. Impact on the surrounding areas and communities

⑥ provides accessibility to the district hospital

⑦ provides accessibility to the markets situated outside the resettlement scheme

⑧ benefits from the neighbouring economies (Manyama Development Project)

The prioritized zones are Blocks F, G and H which are partially demarcated. To evaluate the priority of each concerned block, factors like demarcation period, the current status of infrastructure development, relocation progress and its accessibility from the refugee settlement have been taken

7-39


into consideration due to the absence of a general plan.

Table 7.4.20 Prioritization of Infrastructure

Item Unit Qty.

Direct impact on settlers Current status Impact on surrounding areas and communities

Score ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧

1. Road 1-1 Roads within Resettlement Scheme (L=383km, W=5.5m)

Block E km 60 km

△ ○ ○ × △ ◎ ◎ - 5

Block F km 52 km

◎ ◎ × ◎ - 5

Block G km 95 km

○ ○ × ○ - 2

Block H km 176 km

○ ○ × ○ - 2

1-2 Roads outside of Resettlement Scheme Manyama Access Road(W=5.5m)

km 30 km

○ ● × ◎ ◎ - 3

M8 Access Road (W=5.5m)

km 50 km

◎ × - - - 1

Bridge 1 (L=20m) Facility 1 unit

△ △ ◎ ● × △ △ - -1

Bridge 2 (Box culvert L=10m)

Facility 1 unit

△ △ ○ × × ◎ ◎ - 3

2. Schools (10 Primary Schools: 2 Maintenance, 4 Replacement, 4 New Construction) Block E (1 Replacement)

Set of Facilities

1 ○ △ △ × △ - - - 1

Block F (1 Maintenance, 2 New Construction)

Set of Facilities

2 ◎ × ◎ - - - 3

Block G (1 Replacement, 1 New Construction)

Set of Facilities

2 ○ × ○ - - - 1

Block H (1 Maintenance, 2 Replacement, 1 New Construction)

Set of Facilities

4 ○ × ○ - - - 1

3. Health Facilities (9 Health Facilities: 3 Partial Maintenance, 6 New Construction)

Block E (1 New Construction)

Set of Facilities

1 ○ ○ ● - - - 0

Block F (1 Existing Facility, 1 New Construction)

Set of Facilities

1 ◎ × ◎ - - - 3

Block G (1 Existing Facility, 1 New Construction)

Set of Facilities

1 ○ ○ - - - 2

Block H (1 Maintenance, 3 New Construction)

Set of Facilities

1 ○ × ○ - - - 1

4. Water Supply Facilities (150 Boreholes) Boreholes Facility 634 Block E Facility 91 ○ ○ × - - - 1 Block F Facility 117 ◎ ○ × ◎ - - - 4 Block G Facility 134 ○ × ○ - - - 1 Block H Facility 292 ○ × ○ - - - 1

*◎: 2 Points, ○: 1 Point, :0Point,×: -1 Point, ●: -2 Points

7-40


Therefore, the priority infrastructures in Meheba are as follows.

Roads in Block F, Roads in Block E…5 Points

Boreholes in Block F…4 Points

Manyama Access Road, Schools in Block F, Health Facilities in Block F, Bridge 2…3 Points

Roads in Block G, Roads in Block H, Health Facilities in Block G…2 Points

M8 Access Road, Schools in Block G, Schools in Block H, Health Facilities in Block H, Boreholes in Block G, Boreholes in Block H, Schools in Block E, Boreholes in Block E…1 Point

Health Facilities in Block E…0 Point

Bridge 1 …-1 Point

7-41


(2) Mayukwayukwa

1) Relevance of Identified Infrastructures

In Mayukwayukwa, a general plan in Resettlement Scheme and the list of infrastructures made by Department of Physical Planning and Department of Survey of Western Province exist. The relevance of identified infrastructures is considered as below.

i) School Facilities

Schools should be located within a 5 km radius from homes according to the national standard requirements. 4 Primary Schools have been identified; 3 existing schools and a new school of which the exact location has yet to be determined but the accessibility from the furthest plot will be within a radius of 5 km.

7-42


Figure 7.4.28 Accessibility to Existing School Facilities in Mayukwayukwa

Shibanga Primary School: about 4.7 km

Jacob Mpepo Community School: about 5.1 km

Lyamunale Primary School: about 9.8 km

Mayukwayukwa Secondary Boarding School

Mayukwayukwa Primary School

Shibanga Primary School

Lyamunale Primary School

Dr. Dominc Minyoi Health Post

5km

7-43


The accessibility to this school from the furthest plot is about 7 km. There is also an area in the south of the settlement which is not within the 5km radius. The distance from a plot in this area to this school is about 9.8 km. Hence, there is no doubt that a new school is needed to cover the south west end of the settlement.

The distance of a new school from Plot No.435 is presented in the following figure.

Figure 7.4.29 Development Plan of Educational Facilities in Mayukwayukwa




5km

New Primary School

7-44


Shibanga Primary School: about 4.7 km → no change

Jacob Mpepo Community School: about 5.1 km → no change

Lyamunale Primary School: about 9.8 km → about 5.0 km

New Primary School: about 5.5 km

Judging from the shape of the resettlement scheme, it is more appropriate to build schools in the center of the East-West axis to even out the distance to be travelled by children on both sides. In fact, schools are built along the U4 feeder road, which is not the ideal location. The national criteria of catchment population within the 5km radius will be taken into consideration when planning a new school. Given the present situation, the coverage of the resettlement area with 4 school facilities including 3 existing schools seems rational.

ii) Health Facilities

The catchment population for health facilities in Zambia are defined as below.

① A Health Post To be established for a catchment population of 500 households (3,500 people) in rural

area, 1,000 households (7,000 people) in urban area

Or within a 5 Km radius for sparsely populated areas.

② Urban Health Centres To be established for a catchment population of 30,000 to 50,000 people in urban area

③ Rural Health Centres To be established for a catchment population of 10,000 people or within a 29km

radius in rural area

④ A Level-1 Hospital Catchment population is from 80,000 to 200,000 (to manage referrals from health

centres)

At least one establishment per district

⑤ Level-2 Hospitals Catchment population is from 200,000 to 800,000(to manage referrals from first level

hospitals)

Provide technical support and training and form the base for provincial mobile health

services.

⑥ Level-3 Hospitals Catchment population is more than 800,000 (to manage referrals from second level

hospitals)

Also provide training and research

Based on the criteria, assuming the household size in Resettlement Scheme in Mayukwayukwa is 7, the approximate population is 1,078 households x 7 = 7,546. The size of health facilities are summarized as follows.

① A Health Post 1,078 ÷ 500 = 3 facilities (3 facilities in the case of low population density area)

② Urban Health Centres N/A

③ Rural Health Centres 7,546 ÷ 10,000 = 0.75 ≒ 1 facilities (1 facility calculating with 29km of

commuting distance)

④ A Level-1 Hospital N/A

⑤ Level-2 Hospitals N/A

⑥ Level-3 Hospitals N/A

There are presently 2 clinics in the resettlement scheme including Shibanga Health Centre and

7-45


Dominc Minyoi Health Post. Based on the national standard criteria, 3 Health Posts and 1 Health Centre would be required in total. Therefore, a new health post is to be added to the existing 2 health posts and 1 health centre.

7-46


Figure 7.4.30 Development Plan of Health Facilities in Mayukwayukwa

5km

New Health Post

Mayukwayukwa 2

Mayukwayukwa 1

Shibanga Clinic


7-47


iii) Water Supply Facilities

The national standard coverage is 1 borehole per 250 habitants.

The number of planned boreholes is 150. The expected catchment population is therefore 150 x 250 = 37,500. If the estimated population of the resettlement scheme is 7,546, the number of programmed boreholes is sufficient even taking the number of personnel on site into account.

2) Component - Road Construction


The distance of the roads estimated necessary by DOR is 158 km of which 40 km has been rehabilitated by Zambia National Service with the support of UNHCR. Rehabilitation works of 145 km are presently ongoing (undertaken by Pine Roads Contractor funded by UNHCR). Hence, the target distance of roads to be rehabilitated is deducted to be 103 km.

Category of identified roads: feeder road. The standard cross section of feeder road in Zambia is as following.

a) Standard width: 5.5 m

b) Pavement: Gravel (t = 150 mm)

Figure 7.4.31 Standard Cross Section of Feeder Road (RDA)

Table 7.4.21 Situation of Identified Roads in Resettlement Scheme


Remarks Planned (Assumption)

Constructed Support

Feeder roads within the resettlement scheme

Access feeder road W=5.5m Type of pavement : gravel）

km 158 55 103 * 150km of feeder roads identified in P152821World Bank document.

ii) Roads Situated on the Outside of the Resettlement Scheme

a) M9 Access Road (L=64 km): U4 / RD310 Access Feeder Road

This road links Mayukwayukwa to D792. The width of this existing road is between 8.0 m to 12.0 m. The rehabilitation of this road will facilitate access to Mongu, the capital of the Western Province.

7-48


b) Bridge 1

The reconstruction of the existing Bailey bridge has been requested. (L=54 m)

Figure 7.4.32 Location Map of Road

Design works are completed and commencement of rehabilitation works has been programmed for D792 (Kaoma to Lukuku) (W=9.5 m, L=175 km). This road will not be part as the identified infrastructures.

Figure 7.4.33 Standard Cross Section of D792 (Planned)

Bridge 1 is located at the junction between Mayukwayukwa and D792 and is categorized U4/310. The existing Bailey bridge, badly by heavy rain in 2013, make-shift rehabilitation works were carried out by RDA and ZNS. However, the central part of the bridge is weighing downwards and the situation may become dangerous in due time.

M9 Access Road U4/RD310 (M9~D792) L=64 km

D792 L=185 km

Bridge1 (Bailey Bridge at present) L=54 m

Mangango Hospital District Hospital Referral Hospital of Mayukwayukwa Area

7-49


Figure 7.4.34 R.C.C Bridge (L=40 m) (Reference)

Table 7.4.22 Quantity of Target Roads Construction (Outside of Resettlement Scheme)


Remarks Planned Constructed Support

M9 Access Road U4/RD310

Rehabilitation of Main Access Road such as M9 (Feeder Road) W=5.5 m

km 0 0 64 *70 km of roads were recorded as main access road in the P152821WB.

Bridge L= about 54 m place 0 0 1 *The existing Bailey Bridge was damaged by heavy rain in 2013. It is temporarily recovered by RDA and ZNS

7-50


3) Component – School Facilities

The need for 4 Primary Schools in the resettlement scheme has been identified; 3 existing schools situated within the 5km radius of plots and the construction of 1 new school.

The basic layout of Primary School is as follows (as per layout plans obtained from MGE).

・Classrooms: 13 (1x3 Classroom Building x3, 1x2 Classroom Building x2)

・Staff House: 6

・Toilet: 8

i) Shibanga Primary School

Construction works, financed by UNHCR, of several facilities are ongoing in this school. The school population is very large but the classes catered are only from Grade 1 to 7. The construction of 1x3 Classroom Building x1, 1x2 Classroom Building x1 and 2 Staff Houses will still be needed to fulfil the standard requirements of a primary school, according to the field coordinator from MGE.

Table 7.4.23 Situation of Target Primary School (Shibanga Primary School)



Support Total



Unit 1 1 2


Unit 2 1 3 *It was recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House Unit 4 2 6 *Three new houses were recorded in the P152821WB.

Toilet Unit 10 0 10

ii) Lyamunale Primary School

Construction works, financed by UNHCR, of several facilities are also ongoing in this school. There is no particular demand from the field coordinator for this school. Nevertheless, the school is still not operating on a full-fledged level according to the standard requirements of a primary school.

Table 7.4.24 Situation of Target Primary School (Lyamunale Primary School)



Support Total



Unit 1 2 3


Unit 1 1 2 *It was recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House Unit 5 1 6 Toilet Unit 4 4 8

7-51


iii) Jacob Mpepo Community School

The existing Community School was constructed with the support of UNHCR last year. As confirmed by our site survey, facilities are insufficient and it does not function adequately as a community school. The construction of 1x4 Classroom Building, 10 Toilets and 3 Staff Houses has been requested by the MGE field coordinator. In the resettlement scheme, the construction of 4 primary schools has been planned. It is more rational to upgrade this community school to a full-fledged primary school as follows.

Table 7.4.25 Situation of Target Primary School (Jacob Mpepo Community School)



Support Total

Jacob Community School

1x3 ClassroomBuilding

Unit 0 3 3

1x2 ClassroomBuilding

Unit 1 1 2 *Two facilities were recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House Unit 1 5 6 Toilet Unit 0 8 8

iv) Intervention details – 5 Primary Schools

Table 7.4.26 Situation of Target Primary Schools

Item Unit Qty.

Remarks Shibanga Lyamunale Jacob

New Construction

Total


Unit 1 2 3 3 9


Unit 1 1 1 2 5 *Four facilities were recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House Unit 2 1 5 6 14 *Three facilities were recorded in the P152821WB.

Toilet Unit 0 4 8 8 20

4) Component - Health Facilities

Given the national standard requirements for health facilities in Zambia, 2 health posts and 1 health centre would be sufficient to cover the entire catchment population in the entire resettlement scheme. In addition to the 2 existing clinics (Shibanga Clinic and Dr. Dominc Minyoi Health Post), a new health post will need to be constructed to fulfil the national requirements.

As for the expansion of the existing facilities, the required facilities have been taken into account by the WB LI Support Programme.

i) Shibanga Clinic

The required facilities for Shibanga Clinic are as below.

7-52


Table 7.4.27 Situation of Shibanga Clinic



Support Total

Shibanga Clinic Staff house inclusive of Cooking Shelter and Toilet/Bathing Block

Unit 3 3 6 *Two facilities were recorded in the P152821WB.

ii) Dr. Dominc Minyoi Health Post

This Health Post is not operational due to inadequate toilet facilities. This situation has been assessed by UNHCR and taken into account by the WB LI Support Programme.

Table 7.4.28 Quantity of Target Clinic (Dr. Dominc Minyoi Health Post)



Support Total

Dr.Dominc Minyoi Health Post

Maternity Block Unit 0 1 1 *It was recorded in the P152821WB.

Staff House inclusive of Cooking Shelter and Toilet/Bathing Block

Unit 0 5 5 〃

Incinerator Unit 0 1 1 〃

iii) Intervention details – 3 Health Centres

Table 7.4.29 Quantity of Target Clinics

Item Unit Qty.

Remarks Shibanga Dr.Dominc Minyoi Total

Staff House Unit 3 5 8 Maternity Ward Unit 0 1 1 Incinerator Unit 0 1 1 ※In addition to above situation, a new Health Post is necessary.

5) Component – Water Supply Facilities

Presently, there are 114 boreholes drilled in the resettlement scheme. An additional of 15 units has been identified for future projects.

Table 7.4.30 Quantity of Target Water Supply Facilities

Item Unit Qty.


Support Toal

Borehole Point 129 21 150 *200 boreholes were recorded in the P152821WB.

*Abnormally high presence of Iron has been detected in water samples taken from 15 existing boreholes. There are only 3 water points that are equipped with iron removal filters. Discoloured water has been witnessed at several water points during the survey mission. Hence, it is important to consider equipment of boreholes in the future projects.

7-53


6) Summary


Table 7.4.31 Summaries of Proposed Items (within Resettlement Scheme)


P152821WB Support (except

WB) Constructed Support Total 1. Roads (Roads in Resettlement Scheme 158 km)

Roads in Resettlement Scheme (W=5.5 m)

Km 55 103 158 150 0

2. Educational Facilities (4 Primary Schools) 1x3 Classroom

Building Unit 2 9 11 9


Unit 4 5 9 4 1


Toilet Unit 14 20 34 20

3. Health Facilities (2 Health Posts, 1 Health Centre)

New Health Post Set of facilities

0 1 1 2 0

1 Existing Health Centre 1 and Maintenance of 1Helath Post


Maternity Ward Unit 0 1 1 1 0

Incinerator Unit 0 1 1 1 0 4. Water Supply Facilities (150 Boreholes)

Boreholes Point 129 21 150 200 0 ※1) The contents of Primary School were calculated based on a typical layout: 13 Classrooms, 6 Staff Houses and 8 Toilets ※2) There are 2 existing Health Centres. In addition to that, 8 Staff Houses, Maternity Ward and Incinerator will be expanded. A new Health Post will be constructed.

Outside of Resettlement Scheme

Table 7.4.32 Summaries of Proposed Items (Outside of Resettlement Scheme)


P152821WB Support

(except WB) 1. Road

M9 Access Road (W=5.5 m) U4/RD310 km 64 70 0 2. Bridge

Bridge 1 (L=about 54 km) Facility 1 0 1

7) Estimation of Construction Cost


Table 7.4.33 Estimation of Construction Cost within Resettlement Scheme


(US$)


Except P152821WB


(US$) Qty.


1. Road (Roads within Resettlement Scheme 158 km) Roads within Resettlement Scheme (W=5.5 m)

Km 45,000 103 4,635,000 0 0

Sub Total 4,635,000 0

7-54



(US$)


Except P152821WB


(US$) Qty.


2. Educational Facilities (4 Primary Schools) 1x3 Classroom Building Unit 75,000 9 675,000 9 675,000 1x2 Classroom Building Unit 57,570 5 287,850 1 57,570

Staff House Unit 39,185 14 548,590 11 431,035

Toilet Unit 5,000 20 100,000 20 100,000

Other cost (50% of the total cost)

Set of Facility

272,500 1 272,500 1 272,500

Sub Total 1,883,940 1,536,105

3. Health Facilities (2 Health Posts, 1 Health Centre 1) New Health Post Unit 74,000 1 74,000 0 0 1 Existing Health Centre, Maintenance of 1 Helath Post

Staff House Unit 39,185 8 313,480 0 0 Maternity Ward Unit 32,500 1 32,500 0 0 Incinerator Unit 4,900 1 4,900 0 0

Sub Total 424,880 0

4. Water Supply Facilities (150 Boreholes) Boreholes Point 4,200 21 88,200 0 0 Sub Total 88,200 0 Total 7,919,770 1,536,105

* Unit price is based on “LI Infrastructure needs assessment – UNHCR”.


Table 7.4.34 Estimation of Construction Cost within Resettlement Scheme


(US$)

In the Case of Single Support Except P152821WB Remarks


(US$) Qty.


1. Road M9 Access Road

(W=5.5 m) U4/RD310

Km 30,000 64 1,920,000 0 0

Sub Total 1,920,000 0 2. Bridge

Bridge 1 (L=54 km) Unit 1,840,000 1 1,840,000 1 1,840,000 *

Sub Total 1,840,000 1,840,000

Total 3,760,000 1,840,000

※ Unit price is based on “LI Infrastructure needs assessment – UNHCR”.

8) Prioritization of Identified Infrastructures

Identified infrastructures are prioritized based on the following evaluation criteria. Points are awarded to each facility by evaluating its direct impact on the settlers, its current status and its impact on the surrounding areas.

The intervention programme from World Bank (WB) is still in the process of being finalized. To avoid duplicated efforts, the facilities identified in the WB project have been eliminated from the target facilities taken into account by this study.

≪ Evaluation criteria≫

A. Direct impact on the resettlement population

7-55


① Contribution to enhancement of relocation

② Contribution to better livelihood

B. Current status

③ Possibility of support by WB

C. Impact on the surrounding areas and communities

④ Contribution to host community

⑤ Accessibility to District hospital

To evaluate the priority of each concerned zone, factors like demarcation period, the current status of infrastructure development, relocation progress and its accessibility from the refugee settlement should be taken into consideration. However, since most of the plots have already been allocated, the conditions of each area within the resettlement scheme are assumed to be similar.

7-56


Table 7.4.35 Prioritization of Infrastructure

Item Unit Qty.

Effectiveness Efficiency Validity

Score ① ② ③ ④ ⑤

1. Road 1-1 Roads within

Resettlement Scheme (W=5.5 m)

km 103 ◎ ○ △ ● △ 1

Tower Zone Clinic Zone Mpande Zone Chibanga Zone Lyamunale Zone Kanyaweza Zone 1-2 Roads outside of Resettlement Scheme M9 Access Road

(W=5.5 m) km 64 △ ◎ ◎ ● ○ 3

Bridge 1 (L=54 m) Set of Facility

1 △ ○ ◎ △ ◎ 5

2. Educational Facilities (4 Primary Schools) Maintenance of Shibanga Primary Schoo l

Set of Facility

1 △ △ ○ × △ 0

Upgrading Jacob Mpepo Community School to Primary School

Set of Facility

1 △ △ ○ × △ 0

Maintenance of Lyamunale Primary School

Set of Facility

1 △ △ ○ × △ 0

1 New Primary School Set of Facility

1 ◎ △ ○ △ △ 3

3. Health Facilities (1 Health Post 1, 2 Health Centres)

Shibanga Clinic Set of Facility

1 △ △ ○ × △ 0

Maintenance of Dr. Dominc Minyoi Health Post

Set of Facility

8 △ △ ○ × △ 0

New Health Centre Set of Facility

1 ◎ △ ◎ × △ 3

4. Water Supply Facilities (150 Boreholes) Boreholes Set of

Facility 1 ◎ △ △ ● △ 0

※◎: 2 Points, ○: 1 Point, :0Point,×: -1 Point, ●: -2 Points

The infrastructures which are considered as a priority in Mayukwayukwa are as follows.

Bridge 1 (L=54 km) outside Resettlement Scheme…5 Points

New Primary School, New Health Centre, M9 Access Road…3 Points

Roads within Resettlement Scheme…1 Point

Maintenance of Shibanga Primary School, Maintenance of Jacob Mpepo Community School, Maintenance of Lyamnale Primary School, Maintenance of Shibanga Clinic, Maintenance of Dr. Domic Minyoi Health Post, Boreholes…0 Point

7-57


7.4.2 Procurement Conditions

The bodies in charge of bidding vary for the different facilities concerned by the LI Programme. The following line ministries regulate directly the bidding process in their related sectors; education, agriculture and health. MHID is in charge of organizing bids for the other public building related facilities. The bidding process for feeder and urban roads is organized at district-level. On the other hand, bidding for roads in other categories is in the hands of RDA. In any case, most of the major bids are carried out from the various ministries at the central level in Lusaka; tender invitations, submission of bids and negotiation of contracts etc. However, orders of routine maintenance works with contracts inferior to 500,000 kwacha are given directly at the provincial level.

Contractors are divided into categories depending on the type of construction works. There are 6 classifications within each category. Contractors are registered and classified by category. Participation in tender calls depends very much on the classification status; each classification has a limited bid amount. Only contractors of class 5 and 6 only can participate in bids pertaining to maintenance works.

The contractors who were registered in 2013 and 2014 in North-western Province and those registered in 2014 and 2017 in Western Province are mostly found to be in class 5 or 6.

Table 7.4.36 Type of Categories in the Construction Industry in Zambia

CODE Type of Construction Works

B General Building works (housing, commerce, industry and related works) C General Civil Engineering works (Precast, prestressed concrete construction Precast concrete works,

piling works) R General Road Works M General Mining Works

B Building Works

C Civil Engineering Works

R Road Works

E Electrical Works

ME Mechanical Works

E General Electrical Works

ME General Mechanical Works

S Special works

Tender bidding of public infrastructures :

・for routine maintenance works less than 500,000 kwacha : Provincial level.

・Other infrastructure works superior to 500,000 kwacha : Central level by line ministries

Classification of Contractors

・Categories are divided by the type of construction works ; 1 to 6 classifications for each category. Registration is required for each category.

・Contractors in class 5 and 6 only can bid for maintenance works.

・Most of the construction firms recently registered recently are mainly of class 5 or 6 only.

7-58


CODE Type of Construction Works

Sa Special Brick Works Sm Special Ventilation Works

Sb Special Plumbing Works Sn Special Polishing Works

Sc Special Painting works So Special Aluminium and Ceiling Works

Sd Borehole Drilling works Sp Special Pre-mix Concrete works

Se Special Electrical Works Sq Special Road Sign and Road Marking Works

Sf Special Filling Works Sr Equipment Fixture Works

Sg Special Thermal-Cooling Works Ss Special Security System and Surveillance (CCTV) Works

Sh Special Floor Works St Special Rehabilitation and Maintenance Works

Si Special Internal and External Coating Works Su Special Demolition Works

Sj Special Waterproofing works Sv Special Fire Protection Works

Sk Special Carpentry works Sw Special Scaffolding works

Sl Special Landscape Works Sx Special Insect Repellent Works

Table 7.4.37 Classification of Construction Companies in Zambia

Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B

1 Qualified Technical Specialists (Civil and Building Engineers, QS)

4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 3 No.

2 Technical staff 5 No. 4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 1 No. 1 No. 4 No. 1 No. 3 Administrative staff 7 No. 6 No. 5 No. 4 No. 3 No. 2 No. 6 No. 3 No.

4 Finance Manager /Accountant （CIMA/CIS/ZICA Member）

1 No.

1 No. 1 No. 1 No.

5 Supervisors 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No. 1 No.

6 Auditors（IAS English） Yes Yes Yes Tes

7 Finance Reporting（ZICACertificate）

Yes Yes

8 Category B (Bid limit) Maximum Contract Bid Amount)

>K40m >K20m- K40m

>K10m- K20m

>K6.75m -K10m

>K3m- K6.75m

>0.0m -K3.0m

9 Category C(Maximum Contract Bid Amount)

>K50m >K25m- K50m

>K15m- K25m

>K10m -K15m

>K3m- K10m

>0.0m -K3.0m

10 Category R((Maximum Contract Bid Amount)

>K150m >K50m- K150m

>K30m- K50m

>K15m -K30m

>K5m- K15m

>0.0m -K5m

11 Mining Related Projects (Maximum Contract Bid Amount)

>K50m >K25m- K50m

>K15m- K25m

>K10m -K15m

>K3m- K10m

>0.0m -K3m

12 Category E(Maximum Contract Bid Amount)

>K75m >K30m- K75m

>K15m- K30m

>K10m -K15m

>K5m- K10m

>0.0m -K5m

13 Category ME(Maximum Contract Bid Amount)

>K75m >K30m- K75m

>K15m- K30m

>K10m -K15m

>K5m- K10m

>0.0m -K5m

14 Category S(Maximum Contract Bid Amount)

>K7.5m >0.0m -K7.5m

7-59


Table 7.4.38 Number of Registered Construction Firms in North-Western and Western Province

Registered Category North-western Province Western Province

No. of Contractors Registered in 2013




4RB - - 1 -

5RBCM - - - -

5BCM 1 1 - -

5RBM 1 - - -

5RB - - 4 3

5C 2 - - -

5B 2 - 6 1

5R - - - 1 6RBCNM 1 - - -

6RB 6 5 12 3 6BM 1 - - -

6CM 1 - - -

6B 24 21 58 17 6C - 1 6E 1 - - - 6R 13 - 1 7

6M 1 - - -

7.5 Important points to Recall in Future Support Programmes

The following differences between Meheba and Mayukwayukwa are worth recalling in the detailed concept planning of future support programmes.

Current status of plot demarcation and allocation progress

Soil survey assessments and demarcation plan are completed for the whole of Mayukwayukwa Resettlement Scheme. The major problem lies in the lack of plots for allocation. As for Meheba, soil survey assessments and demarcation plan are partially completed in the resettlement scheme; only Blocks F, G and H are demarcated. The entire demarcation plan is scheduled to be completed by 2018.

Size of Resettlement Schemes

The number of demarcated plots stands at 1,073 in Mayukwayukwa, which is just about six times less than the total number of 6,000 plots expected in Meheba.

Natural Conditions

Compared to Mayukwayukwa, Meheba has a higher annual rainfall precipitation and possesses more natural water sources including several springs. The groundwater level is also higher in than in Mayukwayukwa.

Location

Meheba is easily accessible as its entrance is situated along an asphalt-paved-trunk road . This main road connects the site to Solwezi, the capital of North-Western Province, and the mines situated close-by. On the other hand, Mayukwayukwa is located 50 km off the main road . The direct access roads to the site are non-paved. In any case, the accessibility to Mongu, the capital of the Western Province and to Kaoma is more time-consuming.

Future Development Plan in the Surrounding Areas

7-60


According to the information collected from Kalumbila, there are plans to expand commercial activities in Manyama, situated just adjacent to the resettlement scheme in Meheba. Apparently, these expansion plans are motivated by the Maynyama development, located in the same area. It is even believed that existing shops have been established in accordance to a land use plan. However, apart from the drawing shown below, there were no detailed plans available at the Provincial Planning Department . Prior to the execution of future projects in Meheba, there will be a need to obtain an update on the extension plans of the surrounding areas.

The social survey studies provided many important insights which should be taken seriously into consideration in future project planning.

Table 7.5.1 Important Insights Gathered from Social Survey Studies

Setbacks of the current LI Programme Proposed Solutions Incomplete comprehension of the resettlement scheme leading to high or mistaken expectations by parties concerned by the resettlement scheme.

・Need to sensitize and provide enough essential information all concerned parties (especially former refugees)

・Planning via participative approach: the preparation of local plans gives the concerned communities the opportunity to have a say in the detailed policies and specific proposals for the use of land in their area.

Conflict cases in the resettlement schemes Conflicts due to double allocation Discord amongst host communities Discord amongst traditional chiefs

・Improvement of data management to reduce and rectify errors in allocation exercises

・Organisation of regular sensitisation campaigns and group meetings in social settings to encourage dialogue amongst stakeholders

Lacking of housing facilities for settlers ・With improved data management, planning should be done more easily according to the background and the capacity of the settlers.

Ambiguity of Rwandan former refugees’ status and standpoint within the LI programme

・The Ministry of Home Affairs is presently appealing to the President’s office for a special exemption. Awaiting outcome.

Weak social bond between groups ・To orientate programmes towards strengthening social bonds between groups

・Organisation of group-spirit-building and farming activities to strengthen social ties

Conflicts between ethnic groups amongst the Rwandans ・ Geographical separation for concerned ethnic groups is advisable to avoid direct contact in the resettlement schemes

Lack of coordinated support from the traditional chiefs ・Regular consultations with and amongst chiefs concerned by the programme are necessary to associate them in the local area planning

Lack of consideration for relocating parties categorized as vulnerable to the resettlement schemes

・Establishment of a support framework for the concerned people enabling them to have a stable life in the resettlement scheme

7-61


Figure 7.5.1 Manyama Development Plan

ANNEX

Annex 1 Schedule of Data Collection Survey……A-1

Annex 2 List of Informants………………………A-3

An

nex

A -

1

An

nex

1: S

ched

ule

of

Dat

a C

olle

ctio

n S

urv

ey

F.Sa

toT

.Oni

shi

J.T

erah

ara

T.I

noue

Y.K

atay

ama

P.L

e M

oign

e

3-Ju

lM

on

4-Ju

lT

ueT

okyo

-> L

usak

a

5-Ju

lW

ed

6-Ju

lT

hu

7-Ju

lFr

i

8-Ju

lSa

t

9-Ju

lSu

n

10-J

ulM

on

11-J

ulT

uePr

epar

atio

n

12-J

ulW

edLu

saka

->

Nor

th-W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

13-J

ulT

hu

14-J

ulFr

i

15-J

ulSa

t

16-J

ulSu

n

17-J

ulM

on

18-J

ulT

ue

19-J

ulW

ed

20-J

ulT

hu

21-J

ulFr

i

22-J

ulSa

tN

orth

-Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e ->

Lusa

ka

23-J

ulSu

n

24-J

ulM

on

25-J

ulT

ueLu

saka

-> M

ongu

26-J

ulW

ed

27-J

ulT

hu

28-J

ulFr

i

29-J

ulSa

t

30-J

ulSu

nM

ongu

-> K

aom

aN

orth

-Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e ->

Kao

ma

(Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e)

31-J

ulM

on

1-A

ugT

ue

2-A

ugW

ed

3-A

ugT

hu

4-A

ugFr

i

5-A

ugSa

t

6-A

ugSu

n

7-A

ugM

on

8-A

ugT

ue

9-A

ugW

ed

10-A

ugT

hu

11-A

ugFr

i

12-A

ugSa

tLu

saka

-> N

orth

-Wes

tern

Prov

ince

13-A

ugSu

nPr

epar

atio

n

14-A

ugM

onPr

erat

ion

for s

ite s

urve

yM

eetin

g w

ith c

once

rned

agen

cies

15-A

ugT

ue

16-A

ugW

ed

17-A

ugT

hu

18-A

ugFr

i

19-A

ugSa

tN

orth

-Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e ->

Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e

20-A

ugSu

nPr

epar

atio

n

21-A

ugM

on

22-A

ugT

ue

23-A

ugW

ed

24-A

ugT

hu

25-A

ugFr

i

26-A

ugSa

tW

este

rn P

rovi

nce

-> L

usak

a

27-A

ugSu

n

28-A

ugM

on

29-A

ugT

ue

30-A

ugW

ed

31-A

ugT

hu

Mee

ting

with

: MoL

NR

, ZA

RI,

Wor

ld B

ank,

DO

R, a

nd U

NH

CR

In L

usak

aM

eetin

g w

ith: U

ND

P, U

NH

CR

, CO

R, H

abita

t for

Hum

anity

, UN

-H

abita

t, FA

O, C

arita

s, U

NIC

EF, I

LO, M

oLG

, and

iDE

Zam

bia

Tok

yo ->

Lus

aka

In S

olw

ezi a

nd M

eheb

a in

Kal

umbi

la D

istr

ict

Mee

ting

with

: Pro

vinc

ial O

ffic

e un

der M

oH, M

oCD

SS, M

oA, M

oLG

, Pro

vinc

ial P

lann

ing

Off

ice,

and

DO

R

Tok

yo ->

Lus

aka

Prep

arat

ion

Prep

arat

ion

Prep

arat

ion

Dat

e

Sub-

Tea

mL

eade

r/A

gric

ultu

re 2

/Rur

alD

evel

opm

ent 2

Reg

iona

l Dev

elop

men

tP

lann

ing

Roa

d an

d Sm

all B

ridge

Prep

arat

ion

Surv

ey o

n Li

velih

ood

Act

iviti

es

Prep

arat

ion

Surv

ey o

n Li

velih

ood

Act

iviti

es

Prep

arat

ion

Surv

ey o

n Li

velih

ood

Act

iviti

es

Mee

ting

with

con

cern

edag

enci

esLu

saka

-> T

okyo

Rep

ortin

g to

JIC

A Z

ambi

a O

ffic

eM

eetin

g w

ith: D

OR

Mee

ting

with

: UN

DP

Rep

ortin

g to

JIC

A Z

ambi

a O

ffic

eLu

saka

-> T

okyo

Kao

ma

(Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e) ->

Lus

aka

Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e ->

Lus

aka

Mee

ting

with

: MoH

, MoG

E, D

istr

ict P

lann

ing

Off

ice,

CO

R, R

O,

MoC

DSS

, and

Fie

ld C

oord

inat

orC

ondu

ctin

g so

cial

sur

vey

Surv

ey o

n Li

velih

ood

Act

iviti

es

Lusa

ka->

Tok

yo

Nor

th-W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

-> W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

Lusa

ka ->

Nor

th-W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

Mee

ting

with

: JIC

A Z

ambi

a O

ffic

e, R

DA

, MoL

G, D

OR

, UN

DP,

UN

HC

R, a

nd M

oLN

R

Mee

ting

with

: UN

HC

R, U

ND

P, D

OR

, CO

R, J

ICA

Zam

bia

Off

ice

Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e ->

Lus

aka

Mee

ting

with

Dis

tric

t Agr

icul

ture

Off

ice

(DA

O),

Dis

tric

t Cou

ncil,

Ref

ugee

Off

icer

(RO

), M

oA, M

oH, a

nd D

OR

Fiel

d Su

rvey

: Res

ettle

men

t are

a, w

ater

sup

ply

faci

litie

s, a

nded

ucat

iona

l fac

ilitie

sM

eetin

g w

ith: D

istr

ict P

lann

ing

Uni

t and

RD

A

Mee

ting

with

: RD

A, D

OR

,M

oGE,

MoH

, MoW

DSE

P, a

ndJI

CA

Zam

bia

Off

ice

Lusa

ka ->

Par

is

Fiel

d Su

rvey

: May

ukw

ayuk

wa

Res

ettle

men

t Sch

eme

Mee

ting

with

: MoG

E, M

oH, a

ndD

istr

ict P

lann

ing

Uni

t

Fiel

d Su

rvey

: Meh

eba

Res

ettle

men

t Sch

eme

Mee

ting

with

: DO

R, S

urve

yD

ept.,

Dep

t. of

Phy

sica

lPl

anni

ng (M

oLG

), R

DA

, MoH

,an

d M

oGE

Rep

ortin

g to

JIC

A Z

ambi

a O

ffic

eLu

saka

-> T

okyo

Mee

ting

with

: DO

R, C

OR

,M

oCD

SS, F

ield

Coo

rdin

ator

Con

duct

ing

soci

al s

urve

y

Mee

ting

with

DO

R, C

OR

, MoA

,M

oCD

SS, F

ield

Coo

rdin

ator

,an

d C

arita

sC

ondu

ctin

g so

cial

sur

vey

Mee

ting

with

: UN

-Hab

itat,

DO

R,

CO

R, a

nd J

ICA

Zam

bia

Off

ice

Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e ->

Lus

aka

Nam

e

Ass

ignm

ent

In S

olw

ezi/M

eheb

a in

Kal

umbi

laD

istr

ict

Mee

ting

with

: Pro

vinc

ial O

ffic

eun

der M

oH, M

oCD

SS, M

oLG

,Pr

ovin

cial

Pla

nnin

g O

ffic

e, D

OR

,an

d Z

AC

CI

Tok

yo ->

Lus

aka

Soci

al S

urve

y 2/

Com

mun

ityD

evel

opm

ent 1

In L

usak

aM

eetin

g w

ith:U

ND

P, U

NH

CR

,C

OR

, Hab

itat f

or H

uman

ity, U

N-

Hab

itat,

and

FAO

Mee

ting

with

: MoL

NR

, ZA

RI,

Wor

ld B

ank,

DO

R, a

nd U

NH

CR

Soci

al S

urve

y 1/

Com

mun

ityD

evel

opm

ent 2

Paris

-> L

usak

a

Prep

arat

ion

Mee

ting

with

：M

inin

g C

ompa

ny, Z

AC

CI,

and

Dis

tric

t Off

ice

unde

r MoH

Tea

m L

eade

r/A

gric

ultu

re 1

/R

ural

Dev

elop

men

t 1

Lusa

ka ->

Nor

th-W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

Nor

th-W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

-> W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

Lusa

ka ->

Nor

ht-W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

(Kat

ayam

a)M

eetin

g w

ith: D

OR

, MoH

, ZA

CC

I, D

istr

ict P

lann

ing

Off

ice,

CO

R,

RO

, MoC

DSS

, Fie

ld C

oord

inat

or, a

nd m

inin

g co

mpa

nies

Con

duct

ing

soci

al s

urve

y

Mee

ting

with

: RD

A, M

oGE,

MoH

, Dep

artm

ent o

f Phy

sica

lPl

anni

ng (M

oLG

), Su

rvey

Dep

artm

ent (

MoL

NR

), an

d Z

ambi

aN

atio

nal S

ervi

ce

Nor

thw

este

rn p

rovi

nce

-> L

usak

a

Prep

arat

ion

Surv

ey o

n Li

velih

ood

Act

iviti

esin

Meh

eba

Prep

arat

ion

for s

ite s

urve

y

Lusa

ka ->

Nor

th-W

este

rn P

rovi

nce

In M

eheb

a in

Kal

umbi

la D

istr

ict

Site

Sur

vey

Mee

ting

with

MoW

DSE

P, P

rovi

ncia

l Off

ice

of D

OR

, Sur

vey

Dep

artm

ent (

MoL

NR

), D

epar

tmen

t of P

hysi

cal P

lann

ing

(MoL

G),

RD

A, M

oWS

Mee

ting

with

: JIC

A Z

ambi

a O

ffic

e, R

DA

, MoL

G, D

OR

, and

MoN

DP

Mee

ting

with

: MoW

DSE

P

Mee

ting

with

con

cern

edag

enci

es

Lusa

ka ->

Wes

tern

Pro

vinc

e

Prep

arat

ion

Prep

arat

ion

Annex

A - 2

F.Sato T.Onishi J.Terahara P.Le Moigne

30-Sep Sat

1-Oct Sun

2-Oct Mon Preparation

3-Oct Tue Meeting with MoA

4-Oct Wed Meeting with MoCDSS Tokyo -> Lusaka

5-Oct Thu

6-Oct Fri

7-Oct Sat

8-Oct SunLusaka -> Mongu, Western

Province

Preparation for field survey

10-Oct TueMeeting with CARITAS

(Mongu)Mongu -> Kaoma

Meeting with BEOConducting field survey on

livelihood acitivities in Meheba

Field survey on basicinfrastructure (a road

construction project by UN-Habitat) in Meheba

11-Oct WedField survey on livelihood

activities and basic infrastructurein Mayukwayukwa

Field survey on livelihoodactivities in Meheba

Meeting with Agro-businessofficer of MoA

Field survey on basicinfrastructure (health and

education) in Meheba

12-Oct Thu Kaoma -> Lusaka

Preparation Meeting with FAO and UNHCR

14-Oct Sat

15-Oct Sun

16-Oct MonVisit to Survey Dept. (MoLNR)

for maps and additionalinformation

Meeting with ILO and COR

18-Oct Wed Preparation Preparation Preparation

19-Oct Thu Lusaka -> Sierra Leone

20-Oct Fri

Meeting with Ms. Maegawa(JICA Expert at DOR)

Lusaka -> Tokyo

Meeting with Ms. Maegawa(JICA Expert at DOR)

Lusaka -> Tokyo

Date

Preparation for Workshop

Additional social survey andconfirmation of LI Programmes

in Meheba

Meeting with ILO, MoA (JICA Experts of Agricultural Policy andof Rice Dissemination Project)

17-Oct Tue　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Workshop on Results of Data Collection Survey in Lusaka

PreparationLusaka -> Cameroon

Preparation for WorkshopSolwezi -> Lusaka

13-Oct FriMeeting with Acting National Coordinator of Ministry of National Development Planning

Meeting with FAO and UNHCR (only Mr.Sato)

Preparation for Workshop

Lusaka -> Solwezi (North-Western Province)

9-Oct MonMeeting with DOR (Mongu),Provincial Agriculture Office,and Kaoma District Council

Meeting with DOR (Solwezi)

Meeting with Kalumbila District Council

Tokyo -> Lusaka

Tokyo -> Lusaka Cameroon -> Lusaka

Meeting with MoCDSS

Meeting with UNDP and JICA Zambia Office

Meeting with DOR

Name

Assignment Team Leader/Agriculture 1/Rural Development 1

Sub-Team Leader/Agriculture2/Rural Development 2

Regional Development PlanningSocial Survey 1/ Community

Development 2

Annex

A - 3

Annex 2: List of Informants

Name Position / Organisation

Implementing Partners

UNDP

Ian Milimo (Mr.) Assistant Resident Representative/ Poverty Reduction

Maziko Phiri (Mr.) Project Coordinator Poverty Reduction

Daniel Garcia (Mr.) Associate Durable Solution Officer, Transition to Sustainable Resettlement – UNDP

UNHCR

Michelo Miyoba (Mr.) Infrastructure

Keshab Shrestha (Mr.) Senior Programme Officer

Arifur Rahman (Mr.) Livelihoods Officer

Guilia Ricciarelli Ranawat (Ms.) Senior Protection Officer

Masaru Tamura (Mr.) Associate Program Officer

FAO

Lazarou Simon Mwale (Mr.) Monitoring and Evaluation Officer

Celestina Lwatula (Ms.) Programme Associate

Andrew Muma (Mr.) Project Officer – Agronomist

Geofrrey Ndawa Chomba (Mr.) Assistant FAO Representative (Programmes)

Francis Chimpangu (Mr.) Programme Associate

ILO

Chana Chelems-Jere (Ms.) Regional Ovserver for Zambia, Malawi, and Mozambique

UN-Habitat

Moonga Chilanga (Mr.) Project Officer

UNICEF

Douglas Abuuru (Mr.) Water, Sanitation and Hygenie Specialist

World Bank

Iretomiwa Olatunji (Mr.) Environmental Specialist

African Development Bank

Lewis Bangwe Agricultural Expert, Zambia Country Office

Governmen Agencies in Lusaka

Commissioner for Refugees (COR)

Abdon Listone Mawere (Mr.) Commissioner for Refugees

Department of Resettlement (DOR)

Muhau Sendoi (Mr.) Chief Planner

Mimba Mweene (Ms.) Senior Land Use Planning Officer

Ministry of Local Government

Numeral Banda (Mr.) Director of Physical Planning, Dept. of Physical Planning

Mukuka Chibwe (Mr.) Acting Director, Dept. of Physical Planning

Patson Philly (Mr.) Asst Director PPH-MLG

Mkumbu Siame (Mr.) Director of Department of Housing and Infrastructures

Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources

Emelia Mtonga Senior Cartographer, Survey Department

Joseph Minango (Mr.) Surveyor General, Survey Department

Kelvin Chola Chibangula (Mr.) Assistant Surveyor General (Cadastral), Survey Department

Garikai Membele (Ms.) Senior Land Surveyor, Survey Department

Annex

A - 4

Zambia Agricultural Research Institute (ZARI)

Moses Mwale Director

Godfrey Mwila (Mr.) Deputy Director of Technical Services

Howard Tembo (Mr.) Chief Agricultural Research Institute, Soil and Water Management Division

Ministry of Community Development and Social Services

Cosmas Lukupulo (Mr.) Director of Community Development

Nasiba Nyambe (Ms.) Chief Community Development Officer

Ministry of National Development Planning

Chitembo K. Chunga (Ms.) Acting National Coordinator

Zambia Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ZACCI)

Makondo Manbwe (Ms.) President

North-Western Province

The Office of the President

M. Katungu Assistant Secretary

Ministry of Agriculture

Derrick Simukanzye (Mr.) Provincial Agricultural Coordinator (PACO)


Raymond Lokomona (Mr.) Provincial Planner (PP), Department of Physical Planning and Housing

Raymond Lukomona (Mr.) Provincial Planner (PP), North-Western Province

Whiteson Simbeya (Mr.) Provincial Engineer

Ministry of Housing and Infrastructure Development

Paul Lusaka (Mr.) Provincial Building Engineer


Elma Siamuzwe Provincial Administration Officer

Mirriam Shambweka Community Services Assistant

Road Development Agency (RDA)

Manda Ndabane (Mr.) Regional Manager, North-Western Province

Dickson Ndhlavu (Mr.) Director of Planning & Design

John Kapenda (Mr.) Monitoring & Evaluation

Elias Mwape CEO

National Council for Construction

Kamulosu Arthur (Mr.) Solwezi Provincial Construction – NWP

DOR Office in Solwezi

Paul Chisanga (Mr.) Provincial Land Resettlement Officer

Sakapaji (Mr.) Technical Officer

Robinson Kalandania (Mr.) Scheme Manager

Chimueka (Mr.) Scheme Coordinator / UNDP

North-Western Province Administration Procurement Unit

Mupeta Boniface (Mr.) Procurement Officer, Provincial Administration Procurement Unit, North-Western Province

Kalumbila District

The Office of the President

Chipawa Chipawa Adjah District Administrative Officer

Annex

A - 5

Kalumbila Town Council

Frank kalenga District Council Secretary

Sianpondo Williard District Planning Officer

Sango Ngovo Town Planner

Willard Siampondo (Mr.) Kalumbila District Planning Officer

Njovu Sangu (Mr.) Kalumbila Town Planner


Daniel Chikwanda District Agricultural Coordinator Officer, Kalumbila District

District Health Office in Kalumbila

Mando Phiri (Dr.) District Health Director, Kalumbila District

Meheba

Msonda Joseph (Mr) Registration Officer COR

Mulife Mataa (Mr) LI Officer / Community Mobilisation Officer

Martin (Mr) Registration Officer COR


Louis Mulale Meheba Chief Officer

Ministry of Water Development, Sanitation and Environmental Protection

Paul Mulka (Mr.) Field Coordinator of Refugee Area

Ministry of General Education

James Kwangu (Mr) Education Field Coordinator

Ministry of Health

Bornson Kalundu (Mr) Medical Field Coordinator

Western Province

Department of Resettlement

Barbara (Ms.) Chiimbwe Provincial Land and Resettlement Officer (DOR)

Provincial Administration

Mwanamuke Ihwale (Mr.) Senior Planner, Provincial Planning Unit

Kufuna Seke Provincial Planner, Dept of Physical Planning and Housing

Ministry of Land and Natural Resources

Brian M. Chitoshi (Mr.) Senior Land Supervisor

Migger Band (Mr.) Provincial Land Officer

Deptment of Public Infrastructure

Eng’r Francis Mwitumwa Senior Works Supervisor, Department of Infrastructure, Western Province

Kaoma District

District Agriculture Coordinating Office

Halbobia Haward (Mr.) District Market Development Officer, DAO, Kaoma District

Rodgers Chipatala (Mr.) Research Officer, ZARI

Chiristal Kakumbi (Ms.) Acting DACO


Emmanuel Lukupwa District Planner (Kaoma District Council)

Kapichi Nathan (Mr.) Deputy Council Secretary

District Health Office

Keneth Mbozi (Mr) District Health Director, Kaoma District

Steven Kata Senior Health Environmental Health Technologist

District Education Board (DEB)

Nawci (Mr) Director

Kanja (Mr) Infrastructure officer

Mwangelwa Education Standards officer

Annex

A - 6

Mayukwayukwa

Terry Chisha (Mr.) Refugee Officer (RO), CoR

Justine Munyaka (Mr.) LI Scheme Coordinator, DoR

Mofya (Ms) LI Officer

Eric Mweendo (Mr) Agriculture Assistant

Charles Sichali Community Mobilisator Officer

Solomon Muleya Registration Officer

Ministry of Education

Maybin Chikwekwe Education Field Coordinator

Ministry of Health

Steven Mafumo (Mr.) Medical Field Coordinator


Patrick Perekel (Mr.) Agricultiral Assistant, Mayukwayukwa Field Office, Kaoma DAO

Jeff Walya (Mr.) Agricultiral Assistant, Mayukwayukwa Field Office, Kaoma DAO

Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries

Ntalasha Chiti (Mr.) Vietnary Assistant, Mayukwayukwa

NGOs

iDE

Melanie Wilkinson Country Manager

Lottie Senkwe Programme Director

CARITAS

Martina Havlikova (Ms.) Head of Programmes

Habitat for Humanity Zambia

Jan Schumacher Project Manager

Saskia Arndt Program officer

Kanyata Mukelabai (Mr.) National Director

Ruth Mitimingi (Ms.) Head of Programmes

Victor Sitali (Mr.) Programmes Manager

AAR Japan

Atsushi Naoe (Mr.) Head of Office

Tomomi Awano (Ms.) Programme Coordinator

Refugee Alliance

Jean Kabengele (Mr.) Refugee Alliance

Private Companies

Lumwana Mining Co., Ltd.

Christopher Mukala (Mr.) Sustainability Manager

Stephen Lukanga (Mr.) Community Relations Coordinator

ATS (Allterrain Services)

Henco Walker Country Manager

Freca Mining Construction Company

Kasongo (Mr.) Freca Mining Construction Company

Annex

A - 7

Western Province

Department of Resettlement Barbara (Ms.) Chiimbwe Provincial Land and Resettlement

Officer (DOR) Tel:0977335223 Email:[email protected]

Provincial Administration

Mwanamuke Ihwale (Mr.) Senior Planner, Provincial Planning Unit

Kufuna Seke Provincial Planner, Dept of Physical Planning and Housing

Mobile: +260-950-489311/ 979-314702 Email: [email protected]

Ministry of Land and Natural Resources

Brian M. Chitoshi (Mr.) Senior Land Supervisor Mobile: +260-977-821818 Email: [email protected]

Migger Band (Mr.) Provincial Land Officer Mobile: +260-977-404520 Email: [email protected]

Deptment of Public Infrastructure

Eng’r Francis Mwitumwa Senior Works Supervisor, Department of Infrastructure, Western Province

Tel. 0977408575 [email protected]

Kaoma District

District Agriculture Coordinating Office

Halbobia Haward (Mr.) District Market Development Officer, DAO, Kaoma District

Rodgers Chipatala (Mr.) Research Officer, ZARI

Chiristal Kakumbi (Ms.) Acting DACO


Emmanuel Lukupwa District Planner (Kaoma District Council)

Tel: +260-217-360149 Mobile: +260-971-551415 Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

Kapichi Nathan (Mr.) Deputy Council Secretary Tel: +260-977-413170

District Health Office

Keneth Mbozi (Mr) District Health Director, Kaoma District

Tel:0966497558

Steven Kata Senior Health Environmental Health Technologist

Tel:0977278690

District Education Board (DEB)

Nawci (Mr) Director Tel:0979894200

Kanja (Mr) Infrastructure officer Tel:0963727598

Mwangelwa Education Standards officer Tel:0977102317

Mayukwayukwa

Terry Chisha (Mr.) Refugee Officer (RO), CoR Tel:0977295605 Email: [email protected]

Justine Munyaka (Mr.) LI Scheme Coordinator, DoR Mobile: +260-977-335223

Mofya (Ms) LI Officer Tel:0978649252

Eric Mweendo (Mr) Agriculture Assistant Tel:0973618303

Charles Sichali Community Mobilisator Officer Tel:0977689495

Solomon Muleya Registration Officer Tel:0977925718

Ministry of Education

Maybin Chikwekwe Education Field Coordinator Tel:0975189607

Annex

A - 8

Ministry of Health

Steven Mafumo (Mr.) Medical Field Coordinator Tel:0962612255


Patrick Perekel (Mr.) Agricultiral Assistant, Mayukwayukwa Field Office, Kaoma DAO

Tel:0973424684

Jeff Walya (Mr.) Agricultiral Assistant, Mayukwayukwa Field Office, Kaoma DAO

Tel:0978137236

Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries

Ntalasha Chiti (Mr.) Vietnary Assistant, Mayukwayukwa

Tel:0978821090

NGOs

iDE

Melanie Wilkinson Country Manager Email: [email protected]

Lottie Senkwe Programme Director Mobile: +260-966-785495 Emial: [email protected]

CARITAS

Martina Havlikova (Ms.) Head of Programmes Mobile: +260-974-599803 Email: [email protected]

Habitat for Humanity Zambia

Jan Schumacher Project Manager

Saskia Arndt Program officer

Kanyata Mukelabai (Mr.) National Director Tel: +260-211-251087 Mobile: +260-962-659874 Email: [email protected]

Ruth Mitimingi (Ms.) Head of Programmes Tel: +260-211-251087 Mobile: +260-977-405493 Email: [email protected]

Victor Sitali (Mr.) Programmes Manager Tel: +260-211-251087 Mobile: +260-211-251578 Email: [email protected]

AAR Japan

Atsushi Naoe (Mr.) Head of Office Mobile: +260-978-759582 / +260-961-402335 Email: [email protected]

Tomomi Awano (Ms.) Programme Coordinator Tel: +81-3-5423-4511 (Japan) Email: [email protected]

Private Companies

Lumwana Mining Co., Ltd.

Christopher Mukala (Mr.) Sustainability Manager Tel: +260-21-8249600 Mobile: +260-966-998695 / +260-977-730143 Email: [email protected]

Stephen Lukanga (Mr.) Community Relations Coordinator Tel: +260-21-824-9000 Mobile: +260-977-730149 Email: [email protected]

Annex

A - 9

ATS (Allterrain Services)

Henco Walker Country Manager Tel: +27-83-289-8300 (South Africa) Mobile: +260-971-926-519 Email: [email protected]

Freca Mining Construction Company

Kasongo (Mr.) Freca Mining Construction Company

Tel. +260-966-429410

Chapter 6 Local Integration Implementation: Challenges and ...6-1 The Republic of Zambia Data...

Documents

Transcript of Chapter 6 Local Integration Implementation: Challenges and ...6-1 The Republic of Zambia Data...