Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

28
Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships

Transcript of Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Page 1: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies

and Limited Partnerships

Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies

and Limited Partnerships

Page 2: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

IntroductionIntroduction

Limited liability companies are relatively new creatures of state statute.

An LLC is a hybrid entity that combines the limited liability of a corporation and the tax advantages of a partnership.

LLC’s are increasingly become the entity of choice for businesses.

Page 3: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

§ 1: LLC’s § 1: LLC’s

1997 IRS rules provide that any unincorporated business (including LLC’s) will automatically be taxed as a partnership unless otherwise indicated on the tax return.

LLC’s are attractive in today’s global business environment because they allow foreign investors to own interests.

Page 4: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LLC FormationLLC Formation

Like corporations, LLC’s are creatures of state law. The owners are called “members” (not shareholders) and their ownership is called an “interest” (not shares).

LLC’s are formed by filing articles of organization with the Secretary of State. (see LLC rules at Texas Secretary of State).

Page 5: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LLC Formation [2]LLC Formation [2]

Articles of Organization require:Name of Business.Principal Address.Name and Address of Registered Agent.Names of the Owners; andHow the LLC will be managed.

Business name must include LLC or Limited Liability Company.

Page 6: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LLC CitizenshipLLC Citizenship

An LLC is a legal entity separate from its owners.For federal jurisdiction based on diversity, an LLC may be treated differently than a corporation. For diversity purposes the citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of its members, which may live in multiple jurisdictions.

Page 7: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LLC Advantages & DisadvantagesLLC Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages Disadvantages

Member liability is limited to amount of investment.

State statutes are not uniform.

Can be treated as a “pass through” entity for tax purposes.

Not all states recognize LLC’s.

Profits can be distributed to members without the double taxation of a corporation. Members pay personal income tax on received dividends.

Page 8: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LLC Operating AgreementLLC Operating Agreement

Operating agreement is analogous to corporation’s bylaws.

Operating agreements may be oral and contain provisions relating to management, dividends, meetings, transfer of membership interests, and other significant issues.

Generally, if the operating agreement is silent, courts will apply partnership principles.

Page 9: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LLC ManagementLLC ManagementThere are two options for management, generally set forth in the articles of organization:Member-Managed: all of the members participate in

management, like a partnership.Manager-Managed: members are elected to manage the

LLC.

If the articles are silent, statutes provide either that each member has one vote or votes are made based on percentage of ownership.

Page 10: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

§ 2: LLP’s § 2: LLP’s

Creature of state statute, similar to an LLC except that an LLP is designed for professionals who normally do business as a partnership (lawyers and accountants). LLP allows partnership to limit personal liability of the partners but allows “pass through” tax advantages.

Page 11: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LLP LiabilityLLP Liability

Recall that partnership law makes all partners jointly and severally for another partner’s tort, including personal assets.The LLP allows professionals to avoid personal liability for the malpractice of other partners.Supervising Partner is also liable for acts of subordinate.

Page 12: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Family Limited Liability Partnerships

Family Limited Liability Partnerships

FLLP is a limited liability partnership in which the majority of the partners are related to each other.

Used frequently for agriculture.

Page 13: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

§ 3: Limited Partnerships§ 3: Limited Partnerships

Entity that limits the liability of some of its owners (the limited partners).

Creature of state statute. Filing a certificate with the Secretary of State is required.

Agreement of two or more persons to carry on a business for profit with at least one general partner and one limited partner.

Page 14: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Limited PartnershipsLimited Partnerships

The General partner assumes all management and personal liability.

Limited Partner contributes cash but has no management rights. Liability is limited to the amount of investment. A limited partner can forfeit this “veil” of immunity by taking part in the management of the LP.

Page 15: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Rights and Liabilities of LPRights and Liabilities of LP

General partners are personally liable to 3rd parties for breach of contract and tort liability. However, a corporation (or an LLC) can be a general partner and have limited liability.

Limited partners have the right to inspect the LP’s books and be informed of the LP’s business.

Page 16: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Rights and Duties of the LP [2]Rights and Duties of the LP [2]

On dissolution, the limited partner is entitled to return of capital contributions.

LP interests are considered securities and regulated by both federal and state securities laws.

Limited partners’ liability is limited to the capital investment.

Page 17: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

LP ManagementLP Management

Only General Partners can manage but they have a fiduciary obligation to LP’s.LP’s enjoy limited liability as long as they do not engage in management functions. An LP will be liable to a 3rd party if the 3rd party believes, based on conduct, that the LP is a general partner.

Page 18: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Dissolution of the LPDissolution of the LP

Dissolved in much the same way as a general partnership (Chapter 33).Retirement, withdrawal, death bankruptcy or mental incompetence of a general partner will trigger dissolution unless the remaining GP’s consent to continue.Creditors are paid first then partners.

Page 19: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

§ 4: LLLP’s§ 4: LLLP’s

Limited Liability Limited Partnership is a type of limited partnership.

Difference between LP and LLLP is that the general partner has limited liability, like a limited partner, up to the amount of investment.

Most states do not allow for LLLP’s.

Page 20: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Case 38.1: Skywizard.com, LLC v. Computer Personalities, Inc.

(LLC Formation)

Case 38.1: Skywizard.com, LLC v. Computer Personalities, Inc.

(LLC Formation)

FACTS:Skywizard.com, an ISP, entered into an

agreement with Computer Personalities Systems, Inc. (CPSI), a computer retailer.

CPSI agreed that beginning September 1, it would run, a “special promotion,” one weekend per month so that a a customer who bought a specified computer would receive a year’s free Internet service through Skywizard.

For each computer sold under this promotion, CPSI agreed to pay Skywizard $79.

Page 21: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

FACTS (cont’d)By March 2000, most of the ISP’s subscribers were

people who had bought computers through CPSI, including about a third of those who bought the “special promotion” computers.

CPSI failed to run the promotion on September 1, and Skywizard sued for breach of contract.

HELD: FOR SKYWIZARD. $100.00However, damages could not be determined due to the

newness of the business.The court held that CPSI breached the contract but that

damages could not be determined.

Case 38.1: Skywizard.com, LLC v. Computer Personalities, Inc.

(LLC Formation)

Case 38.1: Skywizard.com, LLC v. Computer Personalities, Inc.

(LLC Formation)

Page 22: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Case 38.2: Hurwitz v. Padden(LLC Operating Agreement)

Case 38.2: Hurwitz v. Padden(LLC Operating Agreement)

FACTS:Hurwitz and Padden formed a law firm as a partnership

without a written agreement. They shared all proceeds on a fifty‑fifty basis and

reported all income as partnership income. Later, Hurwitz filed articles with the state to establish the firm as an LLC.

More than three years later, Padden told Hurwitz that he wanted to dissolve their professional relationship. They failed to resolve a division of fees from several of the firm’s cases.

Hurwitz sued, seeking a distribution of the fees on a fifty-fifty basis.

Page 23: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

HELD: FOR HURWITZ.The court applied partnership law and entered

a judgment in favor of Hurwitz. The state LLC act specifically incorporated the

definition and use of the term “dissolution” from the Uniform Partnership Act (UPA).

The firm had no written agreement regarding the division of receipts before or on dissolution, the disputed fees related to work acquired before the dissolution, and before the dissolution, the firm divided receipts equally between the parties.

Case 38.2: Hurwitz v. Padden(LLC Operating Agreement)

Case 38.2: Hurwitz v. Padden(LLC Operating Agreement)

Page 24: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Case 38.3: Miller v. Dept. of Revenue(Formation of Limited Partnership)

Case 38.3: Miller v. Dept. of Revenue(Formation of Limited Partnership)

FACTS:Loverin and Miller formed an LP and bought a

low-income housing project and retained Rockwood Development Corporation to manage it. Loverin and Miller were the general partners and Rockwood the only limited partner/

The certificate allocated 2 percent of the profits/losses to Loverin and Miller and 98 percent to the limited partners. Eventually 21 other limited partners invested, but none signed the articles or the certificate.

Page 25: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

FACTS (cont’d):American Properties Corporation (APC) replaced

Rockwood, and Loverin, Miller, and the president of APC signed a document that purported to amend the articles. The document provided that the partners could reallocate profits and losses as they “may agree.”

On their income tax returns, Loverin and Miller allocated 99.9 percent of the losses to themselves.

Oregon Department of Revenue reallocated the losses according to the provisions in the original articles—2 percent to general partners and 98 percent to limited partners. Miller sued.

Case 38.3: Miller v. Dept. of Revenue(Formation of Limited Partnership)

Case 38.3: Miller v. Dept. of Revenue(Formation of Limited Partnership)

Page 26: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

HELD: AGAINST MILLER.“There is no evidence in this record

that the amended articles were signed by the 21 limited partners” other than APC.

Without those signatures, the amended articles were not effective, and Loverin and Miller could not rely on them to allocate profits and losses.

Case 38.3: Miller v. Dept. of Revenue(Formation of Limited Partnership)

Case 38.3: Miller v. Dept. of Revenue(Formation of Limited Partnership)

Page 27: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

Case 38.4: BT-I v. Equitable Life Insurance

(Limited Partners and Management)

Case 38.4: BT-I v. Equitable Life Insurance

(Limited Partners and Management)

FACTS:BT‑I and Equitable entered into a limited partnership

to develop and operate an office building and retail complex.

BT-I was the limited partner, and Equitable was the general partner with the sole right to manage the firm.

Banque Paribas lent the firm $62.5 million and Equitable bought it for $38.5 million. On the due date, Equitable demanded full payment from the partnership, but none was made and foreclosure resulted.

BT-I sued Equitable claiming breach of fiduciary duty.

Page 28: Chapter 38 Limited Liability Companies and Limited Partnerships.

HELD: FOR BT-I.A general partner of a limited partnership is

subject to the same restrictions, and has the same liabilities to the partnership and other partners, as in a general partnership.

Equitable’s conduct in buying and foreclosing the loans went far beyond whatever safe harbor might be found in the partnership agreement.

Equitable was still a fiduciary, and its conduct must be measured by fiduciary standards.

Case 38.4: BT-I v. Equitable Life Insurance

(Limited Partners and Management)

Case 38.4: BT-I v. Equitable Life Insurance

(Limited Partners and Management)