CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY -...
-
Upload
hoanghuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
226 -
download
6
Transcript of CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY -...
57
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction As mentioned earlier, the study has been divided mainly into two parts. On supply side,
venture capital firms in India have been surveyed to provide an overview of the venture
capital investment process and their investment policy. On demand side, the
entrepreneurs who have availed venture capital funding in Gujarat have been studied so
as to analyse the role played by the venture capitalists in the development of their
venture. Besides, the funding preferences of young entrepreneurs from Gujarat have also
been studied to identify the potential for the development of venture capital in the state.
The overview of the study is depicted in the chart 3.0. The detailed research
methodology including research objectives, research design framework, sample/data
description methodology, sources of information, content of the questionnaire and data
analysis methods with respect to each of these studies is discussed in this chapter. The
highlight of the same for all the three studies together has been presented under table 3.4
at the end of the chapter.
Figure 3.0 Overview of the Study
VC Survey (Supply Side)
(Studying the Venture Capital Investment Process in India)
Entrepreneurs with VC funding
(Studying the role of the VC in the development of the venture in Gujarat)
Entrepreneur’s Survey
(Demand Side)
Entrepreneurs without VC funding
(Studying the funding preferences of young
entrepreneurs in Gujarat)
Classification of the Study
58
3.1 Research Questions After understanding the need for the research, it is now possible to derive specific
research questions. The context which inspires the research questions along with the
specific research questions are given in the table 3.0.
Table 3.0 Research Questions and Their Context Context Research Questions
The growth of venture capital industry is not just restricted to developed countries such as US and Europe. Developing countries, specifically Asia-Pacific, are witnessing an increase in venture capital investments.
What is the growth pattern of venture capital industry in US and Europe? (Chapter four) Which developing coutries, in Asia-Pacific rim, are experiencing an increase in venture capital investment and what are the reasons for the same? (Chapter four)
Indian venture capital industry is growing across different stages of venture development, sectors and cities.
What is the historical evolution and current scenario of venture capital industry in India? (Chapter five)
Gujarat is at systematic disadvantage as far as the provision of venture capital investment is concerned. However, there are various developments taking shapes in this entrepreneurial state that highlight the potential for the development of the venture capital industry in future.
What is the current scenario of venture capital industry in the state? (Chapter six) Which are the major barriers for the development of the venture capital industry in the state? (Chapter six) What are the political, economical, social and technological developments initiated in the state that would facilitate the growth of venture capital industry in the state? (Chapter six) What are the funding preferences of young entrepreneurs of Gujarat? (Chapter seven)
Venture capital investment decision process is a complex and ill-defined process. There are various stages of venture capital investment and decision determinants related to this process differ across different countries.
What are the decision determinants related to the process of venture capital investment as preferred by Indian venture capitalists? (Chapter seven)
More than financial support, venture capitalists provide non-financial support to the ventures.
What kind of support is extened by venture capitalist (GVFL) in the development of the venture in Gujarat? (Chapter seven)
59
3.2 Research Objectives To answer the research questions as highlighted in the table above, following specific
research objectives have been set for the study.
1. To study the the evolution and growth of venture capital industry at international
(US, Europe and Asia-Pacific), national (India) and regional level (Gujarat).
2. To investigate in detail the decision determinants of Indian venture capitalists in
relation to pre-investment strategies, post-investment activities, monitoring and
controlling of the investee, investor-investee relationship, syndication,
geographical preference for investment and the divestment of the VCs from the
business of the investee.
3. To investigate the structure and functioning of VC firms and their invested
companies.
4. To examine the role played by the venture capitalists in the gwoth of the ventures
funded by them in Gujarat (Specifically of GVFL).
5. To find out the funding preferences of young entrepreneurs from Gujarat.
6. To make suggestions for the further development of the venture capital industry
at national level (India) and regional level (Gujarat).
3.3 Research Design Descriptive research design was used for the present study as the research aims to
investigate the venture capital investment process with basic emphasis on the investor-
investee relationship.
3.3.1 Scope of the Study For studying the venture capital investment process, venture capital firms operating
across different cities in India such as Bangalore, Mumbai, Chennai, Pune, Delhi etc.,
have been considered. Foreign VC/PE firms investing in India were also approached
through their offices located in India. For studying the role played by the venture
capitalists in the development of the ventures, responses were collected from the
companies that had raised VC funding in Gujarat. For this study, the ventures from
which the VC had already made an exit were also included in order to have a larger set of
60
responses for meaningful analysis. For studying the funding preferences of young
entrepreneurs, again the responses were collected from the firms located in Gujarat. Care
has been taken to include only knowledge based and innovative entrepreneurial ventures.
For the purpose of the study, entrepreneurial ventures are defined as those ventures that
are pursuing opportunities, characterized by innovative practices beyond what a small
business might exhibit, high risk and have growth and profitability as their main goals.
The innovation may be in the product or service itself, or in the business processes used
to deliver it. Demand side studies were restricted to geographic region of Gujarat due to
convenience, access available and willingness to share the information on the part of
investee companies.
3.3.2 Data Sources and Research Approach It is well established that while the secondary data provides good conceptual clarity and
direction to begin with, primary data based on empirical study often helps the researcher
get insightful inferences about the subject of interest. Hence, for the purpose of gaining
maximum possible knowledge related to the study, both the data sources have been duly
and optimally used.
3.3.2.1 Primary Data Primary data from venture capitalists across India and entrepreneurs from Gujarat was
collected using the survey approach through structured questionnaires. These surveys
covered various issues to meet the objectives of the study. A survey questionnaire was
developed building upon the insights obtained through structured interview with Gujarat
Venture Finance Limited (GVFL) and various other venture capitalists and academicians
approached at VC-PE meet organized at IIM-A during February, 2009. Questionnaires
were prepared in English considering the profiling of the respondents on demand
(knowledge entreprenrus) and supply side (venture capitalists) of the studies.
3.3.2.2 Secondary Data For studying the evolution and growth of venture capital industry at international (US,
Europe and Asia-Pacific), national (India) and regional (Gujarat) level, secondary data
was considered. The literature studies related to venture capital and private equity,
articles, journals, books, previous students’ projects at IIM-A, other published and
61
unpublished sources, internet web pages and electronic database like ebsco were used as
secondary sources. Various libraries, particularly of IIM-A, were accessed to collect the
information. Reports with respect to industry statistics available free on the website of
IVCA and VentureIntelligence were used for supporting the industry statistics.
3.3.3 Sample Selection and Contact Methods
A sampling plan basically entails the sample selection criteria, sampling unit, sampling
technique, sample size, element and respondent definition for the survey.
(A) For Studying the Venture Capital Investment Process by Indian Venture
Capitalists (Supply Side)
The database of 163 venture capital firms was complied for this study. In order to
assemble this database, the first and the obvious choice was to look for the members of
Indian Venture Capital Association (IVCA). However, upon the closer scrutiny of the
Indian venture capital industry, it was found that the data were questionable in two ways.
First, it included a few set of actors that may not be classified as venture capital firms.
There are many members registered with the association that were intermediaries
facilitating the investments by the VC in the investee companies but not actually
investing themselves in those investee companies. Second, the association did not have
some VC firms as members. The next choice was to compile the list from the SEBI
registered funds. But the same problem was encountered there too. There were 127 funds
registered with SEBI as on September 2008. It is worth noting here that these are the
funds and not the firms. A single firm may have multiple funds for investment in
different sectors and stages of venture development.
For this survey, the responding unit was a firm and not the fund so as to capture the
investment approach of the entire firm for all these funds rather than a fund specific
approach. With respect to IVCA, there are around 50 members registered with the
association as on September 2008. Hence, database of 163 VC firms in India was
compiled in contrast to much smaller number of firms listed by IVCA and SEBI.
The list was then expanded by including VC firms found in a number of other sources
namely Indian School of Business (ISB), Hyderabad’s database of VC firms, list of VC
62
firms compiled by National Entrepreneurship Network (NEN) in India and various
newspaper articles that frequently report about the new investments happening in India.
By bringing all these data together, a gross list of 163 VC firms was assembled. This list
included only VC firms operating in India. Foreign VC/PE firms investing in India were
also part of the list and they were approached through their offices located in India.
The next task was to assemble contact details of the firms for distributing the
questionnaires among them. The contact details of these VC firms were downloaded
from the websites of these respective firms. Besides, the contact details, information
regarding these funds, investment strategies, portfolio firms, and top management teams
were also collected through their web pages. This was to ensure that these are the firms
investing at early expansion and expansion stages because the funds active only in
buyout deals were not a part of the survey.
Out of 163 firms, 81 firms responded to the survey. However, only 38 responses were
found to be useful as they had returned the completely filled in questionnaires. 18 VC
firms declined to participate in the survey for various reasons such as confidentiality,
policy of not participating in such survey, lack of time to complete the comprehensive
details, they had stopped investing in the current scenario etc. Further, 25 VC firms were
intermediaries and hence could not participate in the survey. The survey was conducted
during October 2008 to June 2009. Thus, nine months following the launch of the
survey, after several rounds of reminder (almost every month through emails followed by
phone calls), only 38 responses were considered to be useful for analysis resulting in the
response rate of 23% approximately. In those cases, where other members of team
replied, it was again ensured that they are not merely junior staff members. In many
cases, telephonic talks were organized with the members of venture capital team on the
appointed day and time.
(B) For Studying the Role Played by the Venture Capitalist in the Development of
the Ventures in Gujarat (Demand Side) The study was carried out in the companies that had raised venture capital funding in
Gujarat. For surveying the VC funded entreprenurs in Gujarat, the first taks was to
assemble the list of such entrepreneurs. However, there was no aggregate statistics
63
available that presents the details of the venture capital investments in Gujarat.
Therefore, to select the representative sample, Gujarat Venture Finance Limited (GVFL)
which is making substantial investments across various sectors and stages of venture
development through its various funds, in Gujarat as well as outside Gujarat, was
approached. As per the opinion of the officials at GVFL, the investment deals, which can
be typically categorized as venture capital investment (i.e. investments by the firms at the
early expansion stages), are being carried out majorly by GVFL in Gujarat.
As mentioned in the report, VCs have specific geographical preferences for investments.
They prefer local investing rather long distance investing for better monitoring and
control. And VC firms in India are highly concentrated in the western part (Mumbai) and
southern part (Bangalore) of the country. So, naturally they may hesitate to consider the
option of investing in Gujarat. If such investment deals are taking place though in less
number, they are normally in syndication with a local partner i.e. GVFL. Or such deals
are private equity deals and buyout deals. However, study of these kinds of deals was
outside the scope of the research.
Further, to generate the list of the VC funded ventures in Gujarat, the details of the
portfolio investment companies available from the websites of the venture capital
companies were also investigated. However, there were no concrete venture capital
investments found in the state. So, finally it was decided to make a detailed quantitative
analysis of all the venture capital funded companies by GVFL in Gujarat.
GVFL has funded 68 ventures across India, out of which it made an exit from 57
ventures till 2009. So at present it has 11 companies in its portfolio. Since the study was
limited to only Gujarat, the ventures funded by GVFL in Gujarat were considered for the
survey purpose. It has funded total 26 ventures in Gujarat, of which it made an exit from
15 of the ventures. All these 26 ventures were approached for the study. Out of all these
ventures, 22 ventures funded by GVFL in Gujarat had responded to the survey resulting
in a response rate of 85%. Four ventures which were not a part of the study were those
ventures that had been closed down since a long time or there was a change in the
management and the original management was not approachable. So, these 22 ventures
studied included the combination of both the kinds of the ventures i.e. ventures from
which GVFL had already made an exit and the ventures in which it continues to have
64
investments. From these 22 ventures, GVFL had made an exit from 12 of them (11 full
and 1 partial exit). Only in two cases, GFVL had invested in syndication with other
venture capitalist. Otherwise it had invested individually in all the rest of the cases.
These 22 ventures are spread across different parts of Gujarat like Ahmedabad, Baroda,
Bhuj, Gandhinagar, Sanand and Valsad. The ventures which are headquartered in
Ahmedabad were approached personally during working hours. The ventures situated
outside Ahmedabad were approached through emails and telephone calls. In all the cases,
the respondents were requested to fill the questionnaire with full honesty and correct
information. The respondents for the survey were the CEOs, Managing Directors or the
Heads of the Finance departments of the company.
(C) For Studying the Funding Preferences of Young Entrepreneurs from Gujarat
(Demand Side)
To select the representative sample of the population, various relevant sources were used
with the help of which a comprehensive list of the entrepreneurs for the study was
complied. Search began with premier education institutes in Ahmedabad like NIRMA
University and Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India (EDI) that are running
various courses on entrepreneurship. Generally, those who already have family
businesses and want to join/diversify them enroll for such courses. The representatives of
such institutes were approached by the researcher for collecting the contact details of
such students. With the help of the email IDs and other telephonic details, these students
who have already passed out and became entrepreneurs; were approached for the survey.
Further, incubate (entrepreneurs availing the facility at the incubation centres) at Centre
for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (CIIE) of IIM, Ahmedabad; National Design
Business Incubation (NDBI) of National Institute of Design (NID); Mudra Institute of
Communications and Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication
Technology; were contacted. For this purpose, incubates who are availing the facilities of
the incubation cells at present and those who have already left these incubation centres
were contacted.
65
To extend the list of such entrepreneurs further, two web sources i.e. The National
Entrepreneurship Network (NEN), and Plugged in were used. NEN, founded in 2002, is
a not-for-profit initiative of the Wadhwani Foundation, working to inspire, educate and
support the next generation of high-growth entrepreneurs in India. NEN was co-founded
by five of India's premier academic institutions like IIT Bombay, IIM Ahmedabad, SP
Jain Institute Bombay, IBAB Bangalore and BITS Pilani. NEN had introduced TATA
NEN Hottest Startup Awards, in association with TATA, a rapidly growing business
group in India in 2008. The purpose was to recognize and support high-impact startups
that innovate, solve hard problems, grow fast and create jobs. For preparing the list of the
entrepreneurs, the startups nominated for this competition from Gujarat were selected
and approached for the survey. Like NEN, Plugged In- Learning through Technology;
also has a list of startups from Gujarat. Plugged In has evolved into a nationally
acclaimed organization operating various innovative high impact programs for the
entrepreneurs.
In addition to these resources, while conducting the VC supported survey, it was
discovered that GVFL receives number of proposals every day for funding requirements.
With the help of GVFL’s staff executives, some of these relevant cases were also
contacted for the survey.
Now-a-days, many management institutes are also gearing up their students towards
entrepreneurship rather adopting routine corporate jobs. The placement cells of such
management institutes were also approached for enlarging the list of the entrepreneurs.
Particularly, IIM-A placement data was very helpful in reaching to those students who
have adopted entrepreneurship as a career option.
Lastly, the newspaper articles featuring the success or failure story of entrepreneurs were
regularly being tracked and also aided the discovery of many such entrepreneurs from
Gujarat. Particularly, the column of “Starting Up” from The Economic Times on every
Friday features the innovative entrepreneurial ventures nationally. Out of these, ventures
from Gujarat were selected for preparing the list.
Also, a kind of snowball sampling was followed where, the respondents were asked to
identify others who belong to the target population of interest. Subsequent respondents
66
were selected based on referrals. The existing startups have been contacted to give
references of their family and friends who have started such innovative ventures in
Gujarat. Thus, by compiling all these resources together, a gross list of the
entrepreneurs/startups was prepared.
After compiling this list, all these entrepreneurs were approached for the survey. In
majority of these cases, the email Ids of these entrepreneurs was collected. As these
startups form the part of knowledge based or technology based sector, they were more
comfortable responding to the survey electronically rather physically. In few of the cases,
the interviews were conducted on telephone as well while the researcher met in person
few entrepreneurs in Ahmedabad for survey purpose.
The survey period was the same as that of VC supported entrepreneurs’ survey i.e.
November-December 2008 to May-June 2009. Unlike other survey (VC survey and the
VC supported entrepreneurs survey), these entrepreneurs were more wiling to share the
information so, though there was a follow up to sending of the questionnaire but it was
not so extensive as compared to the prior two surveys. Without exception, majority of
the entrepreneurs approached for the survey were forthcoming with their response and
displayed significant interest and involvement. That truly shows the passion of the youth
to help improve existing entrepreneurial ecosystem in the state.
The respondents were the entrepreneurs/promoters of these startups. In total, it was
possible to generate the responses from 43 startups from the state. Most of these
responses came from Ahmedabad city of Gujarat which is considered to be an
entrepreneurship hub of the state. This fact is quite evident from the list of the nominees
available on the website of TAT NEN Hottest startups. They have listed 18 high growth-
high impact ventures on the website from Gujarat of which 14 were from Ahmedabad
city. Further, as mentioned before, all the incubation centres of Gujarat are also located
in Ahmedabad. All the premier institutes promoting entrepreneurship and supporting the
innovations are situated in Ahmedabad. Considering all these facts, it is natural to
conclude that the maximum responses (91%) were from Ahmedabad city.
67
3.3.4 Research Instrument Development Prior to selecting survey approach for the research, several other methods for data
collection, potentially viable for such a study, have been considered and assessed. Brief
evaluation of these alternatives is presented below.
Though case studies are used as means to validate findings from other methods and to
deepen the knowledge in specific areas, case study research is rarely applied
methodology in VC/PE research. This is due to the tendency of the VC/PE firms to
withhold the detailed information about transactions thinking that this information is
confidential. Hence, comprehensive and reliable case data can not be obtained. For
studies related to entrepreneurs, due to unwillingness on their part to share all the
financial and non-financial details with respect to role performed by the VC, it was not
possible to write detailed cases on such companies. In the survey also, financial details
like the bifurcation of equity holdings between the promoter and the VC, were not
mentioned in few of the cases.
Participatory action research, whereby the researcher gets directly involved in the
investment process, would have permitted deep insights into specific situation. Action
research would have been very useful in order to fully understand the entire venture
capital investment process. However, as a matter of policy, these firms would not allow a
third party, even the researcher, to be closely involved in such a process. This is again
due to very high concern for confidentiality of information. In literature review, there are
no specific instances of scientific studies based upon participatory action research.
A large amount of data published by various associations and research agencies in the
area of venture capital could have been used for performing time series analysis or
multivariate data analysis. Such vast data facilitates generalization of findings but on the
contrary, dilutes the ability to analyse the relationships of variables in-depth. In fact,
availability of consolidated data on venture capital investment in India is rather poor.
The main source of information is in the form of highly aggregated statistics produced
annually by IVCA and other research agencies like Venture Intelligence. Small venture
capital firms which are not the members of this association are excluded for the purpose
of reporting the data. So the reported data may be biased towards larger deals. Moreover,
68
databases do not contain information necessary to fully understand the reasons for
certain transaction.
Considering the merits and demerits of all methods, it was felt that for collecting useful
data a survey method was appropriate. VC/PE firms were more willing to share
information about the investment preferences and styles in surveys on the condition that
the information provided by them would be treated highly confidential and on an
anonymous basis, rather than for specific cases or databases, which tie the data to
identify the VC/PE firms.
3.3.5 Description of Variables and Design of Questionnaire
(A) For Studying the Venture Capital Investment Process by Indian Venture
Capitalists (Supply Side)
The entire questionnaire was divided mainly into five parts keeping in mind the scope of
the study. The first part of the questionnaire was designed to study of the variables
describing the characteristics of participating Indian VC firms in the survey. These
variables mainly include demographics of VC firms like the location, year of
establishment, type of the firm for example government sponsored VCF, bank sponsored
VCF or private VCF etc., number of portfolio companies and number of top management
team with entrepreneurial background etc.
The second part of the questionnaire highlighted the variables with respect to the
investment policy of the respective VC firms. It concentrates upon the investment policy
details like their preference for stage of investment i.e. seed, startup, early expansion or
expansion stages; sectors for investment, minimum and maximum amount of investment,
instrument of financing used including equity, debt, convertible securities; ownership
stake normally taken by them.
The study of the location pattern of the participating VC firms as well as the secondary
information suggested that VC investments in India are concentrated mainly in Western
and Southern part of the country. To verify upon the same, this portion of the
questionnaire throws light upon the geographical investment preferences of the VC firms
in India i.e. whether they prefer to invest in India or outside India or combination of
69
both. If they invest in India whether they have any region specific interest for investment
i.e. they prefer investing in south, north, east or west. The questionnaire also asked the
respondents to rate the importance they give to be geographically near to the investee
companies.
Further, investment preferences of the VC firms for investing in the businesses that were
earlier incubated or funded through angels were also checked upon. For this, the
participants were asked to rate their perceptions of these early stage financing options
like incubation and angel investors on an agreement scale of strongly agree, agree,
neutral, disagree, and strongly disagree. They were provided with the statements like
incubators and angel investors add value to the investment, they are vital source of early
stage finance and they are necessary to ensure VCs continue getting a good deal.
The second part also investigated the preferences of VC firms for syndication as an
investment option. The VC firms were asked to rate the reasons considered for
syndication on an importance scale of extremely important, very important, neutral,
somewhat important and not important. The reasons mainly include: financing of larger
investment, risk sharing, superior selection of investment, window dressing, access to
specific skills for better management, deal outside the preference of industries or
geographical regions etc. In addition, they were also asked to specify the stage i.e. early,
late stage or exit stage, for syndicating with other VCs.
Now, third part of the questionnaire deals with the pre-investment activities of the VCs
mainly, the sources of deals used by them for generating the deal flow and the evaluation
criteria considered by them prior to actual investment options. With respect to deal
sources, the participating VC firms were asked to rate their preferences for sources of
potential deals starting with least preferred to highly preferred sources. These sources
mainly include referrals, looking for deals themselves, getting deals from the VC
community, unsolicited calls by entrepreneurs themselves and getting deals from the
prior investees.
The questionnaire further asked the investors whether they prefer in-house experts,
outside consultants or a combination of them for due diligence purpose. To analyse the
evaluatin criteria, the survey asked the VC firms to rate the same on an importance scale
70
of irrelevant, desirable, important and essential. These criteria were grouped under five
different heads i.e. Entrepreneur ( quality of management team, personality and attitude
of the entrepreneur, Past track record, urge to grow, referred by a reliable source,
familiarity with the market, promoter’s own contribution and focused development
strategy), Market (growth rate, domestic/international market potential, little threat of
competition), Product/Service (high tech product, ready prototype, proprietary
protection), VC firm’s financial and non-financial requirements (rate of return, size of
investment, exit routes, liquidity, consistency with investment preference, quality of
business plan, consistency with VC firm’s expertise and presence of co-investors) and
lastly, Environmental Conditions (tax benefits and regulatory environment)
Fourth part of the questionnaire relates to post-investment activities of the VC firms
mainly the investor-investee relationship and the monitoring and the control exercised by
them over the investees. With respect to the investor-investee relationship, the VC firms
were asked to rate their involvement in general with the business of the investee on a
scale of high, medium, low and no involvement. These involvement areas were clustered
under four different heads like Product Development (technology, research and
development and production), Marketing (customer knowledge, sales, formulating and
evaluating marketing plans), General Business Management (serving as a sounding
board, selecting management team, networking, strategic alliance partner),and finally,
Finance and Accounting (cash management, budgeting, further funding and exit). For
emphasizing the relationship between the VC and the investee company, the survey
asked the VC firms to specify the areas of conflict with the investee company like
information concealed by the investee, timing and amount of investment, differences in
the perception of both the parties, staging and excessive control by VC.
With respect to monitoring and controlling, the participating VC firms were asked to rate
the methods and means for formal monitoring i.e. use of budgets, business plans,
monthly accounts and financial statements. They were also asked to rate the methods of
collecting information (telephonic conversation, board meeting, personal Visit and
management reports) on a preference scale of least preference to highest preference. To
validate the findings, the VC firms were requested to specify the frequency of
performance review and personal visits to the investee companies as monthly, quarterly,
half yearly and yearly. In order to avoid the agency problem (i.e. problems arising due to
71
goal incongruence between the VC and entrepreneur), VC firms normally put restrictive
covenants in the venture capital investment agreement. Here, the participants were asked
to rate the areas of investee company normally controlled by them on a scale of high
control, medium control, low control and no control. These areas include capital
expenditure, working capital management, debt levels, dividend payment, management
remuneration, recruitment of personnel, participation in mergers and sale of assets.
Finally, the fifth part of the questionnaire was related to the divestment mechanisms
applied by the VC firms in India. It included the various exit options used by them like
initial public offer (IPO), trade sale, secondary sale, liquidation and repurchase of shares
by the investee company. In addition to the options, they were also asked to specify the
time frame preferred for exiting the business of investee. The durations were specified as
less than 5 years, 5-7 years and 7-10 years. VC firms were asked to indicate the average
target annual rate of return from investments made in the ventures from the options such
as 10%-20%, 20%-30%, 30%-40% and more than 40%.
The questionnaire for the study is attached in the appendix at the end of the thesis (Refer
Appendix B). The break up of the questionnaire is presented in the following table.
Table 3.1 Details of the Questionnaire (Supply side)
Part Description Number of Questions
Total
I Characteristics of Participating VC firms: 1. Name and Location 2. Year of Establishment 3. Firm Type 4. Number of Portfolio Companies 5. Members of Management Team with Entrepreneurial
Background
1 1 1 1 1
5 II Investment Policy Variables:
1. Stage of Investment 2. Sector of Investment 3. Minimum and Maximum Amount of Investment 4. Percentage of Actual Investment and Reasons for
Rejecting Investment Proposals 5. Instrument of Financing and Percentage of Equity Stake 6. Regional Preference 7. Policy with respect to Investment in Businesses Earlier
Incubated or Funded by Angel Investors 8. Syndication
1 2 1 2
2
5 3 3
19 (Contd.)
72
Part Description Number of Questions
Total
III Pre-Investment activities: 1. Deal Sources 2. Evaluation Criteria
1 1
2 IV Post-Investment Activities:
1.Involvement in the Business of Investee 2.Monitoring and Control
1 5
6 V Divestment Mechanism:
1.Exit Options 2.Time Frame for Exit 3.Targeted Rate of Return
1 1 1
3 Grand Total 35
(B) For Studying the Role Played by the Venture Capitalist in the Development of
the Ventures in Gujarat (Demand Side) The questionnaire for this study was mainly divided mainly into two parts. The first part
addressed various demographic variables such as gender, education, age, nativity,
location for starting venture, entrepreneurial family background, the support extended by
the family members and previous work experience.
Literature on entrepreneurship suggests that there are diverse motives that trigger
entrepreneurship within an individual. Therefore, the study also concentrated upon
investigating various internal and external drivers that motivates an individual for taking
up entrepreneurship over a corporate job. These mainly include ‘need for independence’,
‘achievement’, ‘monetary gain’, ‘break-off from the corporate gain’, ‘inspiration’ and ‘to
support the society and family business’.
The questionnaire also sought venture specific details like nature of innovation (product
or service), sector/industry (IT and ITES, education, healthcare, textile, bio-tech,
tourism, automobile, hospitality etc.) and stage of venture development (seed, startup,
early expansion and expansion), the number of ventures (first, second, third and so on)
undertaken by them and ownership structure of these ventures (partnership, private
limited company, public limited company, others).
The entrepreneurs were asked whether they had presented their business plans in any
competitions and if so, they were further asked to rate the role of such competition on a
73
scale of high, medium and low. The study also checked upon the familiarity of the
entrepreneurs towards early stage funding options like incubation and angel investments.
The entrepreneurs were asked to rate their familiarity with these options on a scale of
never heard of, heard of only, know a little bit, know a fair amount and know very well.
Besides, the study also highlighted the use of bootstrapping techniques among these
entrepreneurs used during the early stages of their venture development like buying used
equipments, renting the physical space, working from home, discounting, use of credit
cards, partnering, loan from family and friends, sharing of equipment-employees and
office space, employing the relatives and friends at below market salaries, obtain
advance payment from customers etc.
Now focusing upon the second part of the questionnaire which mainly relates to value
added role performed by the VC and the investor-investee relationship, presented first of
all venture capital investment details like the amount of investment, the year in which the
funds were raised, whether the VC had already exited from the venture or continues to
have investments, instrument of financing used, the bifurcation of equity holding
between the promoters and the venture capitalist, time gap between the application to
approval etc. The study also finds out the reasons for approaching the VC. The
questionnaire asked the entrepreneurs how they came to know about this particular
option for raising funds. The options included newspaper, consultants, banks/financial
institutions, friends or any other sources.
With respect to the involvement of the VC on the board of the investee company, the
survey had kept questions related to number of seats offered to the VC and how did the
entrepreneurs perceive the role of the VC on the board of their companies. They were
asked to rate the same on a scale of active, passive or none. The entrepreneurs were
further asked to specify the frequency of interaction with the VC or its staff. They were
provided with various options like once a moth, twice a month, once in two months, once
in three months and once in several months.
To specifically highlight the role of the VC in various functional areas of the business of
the investee company, the entrepreneurs were asked to rate the differences in the
expected contribution prior to VC investment and the perceived actual contribution post
VC investment on a scale of 1(least involved) to 5(most involved). These areas were the
74
same as analysed in the VC survey. They include the options like Product Development
(technology, research and development and production), Marketing (customer
knowledge, sales, formulating and evaluating marketing plans), General Business
Management (serving as a sounding board, selecting management team, networking,
strategic alliance partner),and finally, Finance and Accounting (cash management,
budgeting, further funding and exit).
Lastly, the entrepreneurs were provided with various positive and negative set of
statements related to VC in general and were asked to rate these perceptions on a scale of
strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree and strongly disagree. The future plans of
expansion have also been addressed through the questionnaire and the entrepreneurs
were asked whether they will approach the same VC or have not yet decided.
This questionnaire is attached in the appendix at the end of the thesis (Refer Appendix
C). The detailed break up of the content of the questionnaire is presented below.
Table 3.2 Details of the Questionnaire (Demand Side)
Part Description Number of Questions
Total
I Profile of VC Supported Entrepreneurs 1. Gender 2. Education 3. Age 4. Nativity (State of Origin) 5. Location 6. Entrepreneurial Family Background and Support of
Family Members 7. Previous Work Experience 8. Reasons for being an Entrepreneur 9. Reasons for Starting Venture in Gujarat
1 1 1 1 1 2
1 1 1
10 Venture Specific Detail
1. Stage of Venture Development 2. Sector of Venture 3. Nature of Innovation 4. Number of Venture 5. Ownership Structure
1 1 1 1 1
5 Early Stage Financing Options and Other Detail
1. Use of Bootstrapping Technique 2. Awareness towards Incubators and Angel Investors 3. Availing Incubation Facility 4. Participation in Business Plan Competitions
1 1 1 1
4
(Contd.)
75
Part Description Number of Questions
Total
II Details Related to Venture Capital Investment 1. Amount of Investment 2. Year of Raising Venture Capital 3. Exit of Investor 4. Syndication 5. Instrument of Financing 6. Equity Holding by Promoter and Investor 7. Means of Knowing about Investor 8. Reasons for Approaching this Investor 9. Round of Funding 10.Raising Funds from Angels prior to VC Investment 11.Time Gap between Application to Approval
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 Pre-Investment Development Activities and Post-
Investment Use of VC in Acquiring the Resources 2
2
Involvement and the Value Added Role 1. Role on BOD of Investee Companies 2. Frequency of Interaction 3. Involvement in Responding to Problems 4. Difference in Expected and Actual Contribution of VC
in various Functional Areas of Investees’ Business 5. Overall Satisfaction of Entrepreneurs
2 1 1 1 1
6
Perceptions of the Entrepreneurs Towards Venture Capitalists in General
1
1
Importance Assigned to Geographical Proximity to the Investor
1
1
Future Expansion and Approaching the same VC 2 2 Grand Total 42
(C) For Studying the Funding Preferences of Young Entrepreneurs from Gujarat
(Demand Side)
The entire questionnaire was divided into three parts where the first part of the
questionnaire like the earlier survey on the entrepreneurs, was related to the study of
demographic and social variables like age, education, nativity, entrepreneurial family
background, support of the family members etc. In addition to profiling of these
individuals, the study also throws light on various internal and external factors triggering
the entrepreneurship. As this survey is focused upon Gujarat, this study also analysesd
various reasons for commencing the businesses in Gujarat by Gujarati and non-Gujarati
entrepreneurs.
76
The second part of the questionnaire was mainly related to studying various venture
specific details like nature of innovation (product or service), sector/industry (IT and
ITES, education, healthcare, textile, bio-tech, tourism, automobile, hospitality etc.) and
stage of venture development (seed, startup, early expansion and expansion), the number
of ventures (first, second, third and so on) undertaken by them and ownership structure
of these ventures (partnership, private limited company, public limited company, others).
The third part of the questionnaire focused upon the main theme i.e. studying the
preferences of these new age entrepreneurs towards funding their ventures. This part
attempts to explore various funding sources employed by these entrepreneurs at the
initial stages of their ventures like personal savings, spouse’s income, friends and
relatives, loan from banks/financial institutions, angel investors, venture capital and
government subsidy. The study also asked the entrepreneurs to specify ratio of
promoters’ contribution viz. a viz. other sources of financing used. The survey examined
whether these entrepreneurs had approached equity investors (i.e. angel investors and
venture capitalists) and if so, why the arrangements did not work out in their favour. For
those who have not availed any external funding yet, the study requests them to mention
the reasons for the same. As most of these ventures were at initial stages, the study also checked upon the use of
incubation centres, business plan competitions and various bootstrapping techniques, by
these entrepreneurs. These entrepreneurs were asked whether they had presented their
plans in any such competitions or not and if so how did they perceive the role of such
competition (high, medium and low) in the starting of their ventures. They were asked
whether they have availed the services of incubation centre at the seed/startup stage.
They were also requested to rate their familiarity on a scale of never heard, heard of
only, know a little bit, know a fair amount and know very well. For bootstrapping
techniques, they were presented with the same set of options as given to the VC
supported entrepreneurs. Besides, the study checked upon the familiarity of these entrepreneurs towards equity
funding options i.e. angel capital and venture capital on a scale of never heard of, hear of
only, know a little bit, know a fair amount and know very well. Like VC supported
entrepreneurs’ survey, the questionnaire also addressed various positive and negative
77
perceptions of these entrepreneurs towards these equity investors. Those who were
familiar with these investors were asked to rate their perceptions for the said investors on
a scale of highly agree, agree, neutral, disagree and highly disagree. These statements
were the same as that of VC baked entrepreneurs’ options so as to facilitate the
comparison among their responses.
Those who have raised debt funding were asked to specify the reasons for approaching
debt investors and rate their experiences with them. Finally, the study explored the
intentions of these entrepreneurs towards expansion in future and the sources that would
be preferred by them for funding such expansion projects.
The detailed break-up of the content of the questionnaire is provided as under.
Table 3.3 Details of Questionnaire (Demand Side) Part Description Number
of Questions
Total
I Profile of Young Entrepreneurs(Without VC support) 1.Gender 2.Education 3. Age 4. Nativity (State of Origin) 5. Location 6. Entrepreneurial Family Background and Support of
Family Members 7. Previous Work Experience 8. Reasons for being an Entrepreneur 9. Reasons for Starting Venture in Gujarat
1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
10 II Venture Specific Detail
1.Stage of Venture Development 2.Sector of Venture 3.Nature of Innovation 4.Number of Ventures 5.Ownership Structure
2 1 1 1 1
6
(Contd.)
78
Part Description Number
of Questions
Total
III Study of Funding Preferences and Other Relevant Detail 1.Sources of Funding Used During Startup Stage 2.Bifurcation between Promoter’s Contribution and
Other Investors’ Contribution 3.Awareness towards Angel Capital and Venture Capital4.Rating of Perception towards these Equity Investors 5.Use of Bootstrapping Technique 6.Use of Incubators and Awareness towards such
Incubation Centres 7.Business Plan Competition and its Role 8.Approaching Equity Investors and Reasons for not
Getting Funding 9.Approaching Debt Investors and Rating Experience of
Entrepreneurs with them 10.Reasons for not involving External Investors 11. Expansion and Preferred Source of Funding for
Proposed Expansion.
1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 3
16
Grand Total 32 3.3.6 Data Analysis Plan
(A) For Studying the Venture Capital Investment Process by Indian Venture
Capitalists (Supply Side)
As mentioned previously, the useful responses for the survey were only 38. Hence, use
of parametric statistical models was not desirable because these models essentially
require larger samples and their underlying assumption is normality in data distribution.
The more appropriate methodology to approach a small sample situation is to employ
distribution free non-parametric statistical models. Hence, present study used non-
parametric statistical analysis for inferring the patterns in data. Apart from the problem
of sample size, parametric tests also require certain assumptions about populations and
data that were violated by the venture population studied herein. The assumptions of
normality of the data were investigated with the help of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for
each variable that was subject to use of sophisticated statistical analysis.
79
For most of our propositions, the Mann-Whitney U test, Friedman One Way Anova Test,
Kruskal Wallis test etc, were used. The selection of non-parametric statistics imposed
some limitations on our research. Most notably, it was not possible to measure the
magnitude of statistical relationships. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 12
was applied for analysis of the data in the present study.
With respect to study of characteristics of participating VC firms in the survey, the
responses were analysed with the help of simple frequency tabulation showing frequency
and percentages. For analysing number of portfolio companies and members with
entrepreneurial background, descriptive statistics such as mean, median, mode and
standard deviation, were also calculated. For studying the investment policy variables
like preference for sector and stage of investment, use of financing instruments etc. the
same methodology of frequency tabulation was applied. Here, for studying the minimum
and maximum investment limits and equity stake by the VC, again the descriptive
statistics were calculated. For many of these variables where only frequencies are
calculated, these variables were found to be nominally scaled or dichotomous type where
the use of further sophisticated statistical analysis was not applicable.
For analyzing the importance of geographical proximity, the VCs were asked to rate the
importance of the same on a scale of extremely important (5), very important (4), neutral
(3), somewhat important (2) and not important (1). The figures in the bracket represent
the weights assigned to the respective measurement scale. This facilitated the calculation
of weighted average score for the geographical importance from the VC’s point of view.
In the entrepreneur’s survey as discussed later in the study, the same question was asked
to the entrepreneurs to judge the importance given by them for locating themselves near
to the VC. In order to compare the statistically the differences in the importance assigned
to geographical proximity by both the parties, Mann- Whitney U test was performed.
Further, with respect to the policy of VCs for investing in the businesses earlier funded
by angels or incubated earlier, again Mann Whitney U test was performed. The
differences in the perceptions were statistically tested among the two groups of VC i.e.
those (VCs) who have invested in such businesses and those who have not invested in
such businesses towards the early stage funding options.
80
For studying the syndication policy of the investors, various reasons for syndication were
rated on the same importance scale as highlighted earlier i.e. extremely important, very
important, neutral, somewhat important and not important. Here, simply the weighted
average mean was calculated to highlight the importance assigned to various reasons, as
mentioned in the content of the questionnaire above.
In pre-investment activities, variables regarding the use of deal sources and evaluation
criteria were studied in detail. To highlight the differences in the use of deal sources
among the VC firms in India as against their age (i.e. recently established, already
established and in between these two), Kruskal-Wallis test was used.
To find out the importance of evaluation criteria by Indian VCs, scale used by
MacMillan et al. (1985) was followed in this survey too. The present study applied
previously validated constructs and measurement variables. The evaluation criteria used
here were the same as used in all these different studies because the variables identified
in these studies were developed over a period of time and are robust when it comes to
reliability. In the study by Tyebjee and Bruno (1984) and the study by MacMillan et al.
(1985) the responses were factor-analyzed to determine what major groupings of criteria
occurred among criteria. Since, many sophisticated statistical tools like factor analysis,
cluster analysis, regression etc. have already been applied by the researchers over a
period of time, the present study merely calculates the mean scores and the results are
almost similar to the previous studies on the same theme. And as the sample size for the
study was relatively small, the factor analysis was not considered.
With respect to value adding functions, VCs were asked to rate their perceptions of the
involvement in the business of the investee on a scale of high, medium, low and no
involvement. For defining the value added functions by the VC, the same areas/functions
as used in the study of Berg-Utby et al. (2007) were followed for the reason that this
categorization of the functional areas was supported with the discriminant validity.
Internal consistency is provided with composite reliability as well as Cronbach’s alpha.
Further, the categorization and the measurement scales were tested by means of a
confirmatory factor analysis by these researchers. In the present study, the mean and
standard deviations were calculated for all these value adding functions categorized into
four parts namely: product development (technical), marketing, general business
81
management and accounting and finance. Further, these perceptions of the VCs were
compared with the entrepreneurs’ expectations from the investors using Mann-Whitney
U test.
For monitoring and control, the variables with respect to means of formal monitoring and
methods of exercising control were analysed with simple frequency tabulation.
Preferences of Indian VCs for collecting the information were analysed with Friedman
Test. For the areas that VCs normally control, descriptive statistics (mean and standard
deviations) were calculated to highlight the areas where higher degree of control was
exercised by the VCs.
Lastly, for divestment mechanism, the exit options, time frame and the targeted rate of
returns were analysed with the help of simple frequency tabulation.
(B) For Studying the Role Played by the Venture Capitalist in the Development of
the Ventures in Gujarat (Demand Side)
Like VC survey, here also due to small sample size (the number was 22) and the
violation of the assumption of normality of data, parametric testes could not be applied.
For analyzing most of the variables, distribution free non-parametric tests like Mann-
Whitney U test, Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed Ranks test, Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman’s
Correlation etc. were used. The application of these tests has been discussed herein
detail. SPSS 12 is applied for analysis of the data.
For studying the profiling of the entrepreneurs who have/had raised VC funding from
GVFL (age, education, location, nativity, previous work experience, reasons for being an
entrepreneur, reasons for starting venture in Gujarat) and various venture specific details
(stage, sector, ownership structure, number of ventures) simple frequency tabulations and
bar charts were used. As these variables were nominally scaled, performing further
statistic was not possible here. There are two kinds of VC funded entrepreneurs i.e.
entrepreneurs with entrepreneurial background and entrepreneurs without such
background. So, for studying the relationship between the entrepreneurial family
background and the support extended by the family members to them, Mann-Whitney U
test was performed.
82
For analyzing the use of business plan competitions, bootstrapping techniques,
incubation facility and raising funds from angel investors before approaching the VC,
again frequency tabulations with a combination of bar charts were used as these variables
were not capable for further statistic analysis due to their nominal scale. For analyzing
the familiarity of these entrepreneurs towards incubation centres and angel investors,
Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed Ranks test was applied with a null hypothesis that there
is no difference in the familiarity of the entrepreneurs towards incubation centres and
angel investors. Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed Ranks test is used for examining the
differences in the location of two populations based on paired observation, taking into
account the magnitude of the difference. Descriptive statistics were also calculated for
these variables.
As mentioned before, prior to probing into the role of the VC in the development of the
venture, various investment related details like year of raising funding, instrument of
financing, exit option, syndication, rounds of funding, time gap between application to
approval etc; were analysed simply with frequency tabulations and percentages. For
analyzing amount of investment and bifurcation of equity holding between the promoter
and the VC, descriptive statistics like mean, median, mode and standard deviations were
calculated.
Now concentrating upon the main theme, i.e. studying the differences between the
expected contribution (prior to VC investment) and the actual contribution as perceived
by the entrepreneurs (post VC investment), Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed Ranks test
was applied with a null hypothesis that there was no significant difference in the
expected and actual contribution by the VC with respect to various functional areas as
discussed above. The composite mean scores for the expected and actual contribution for
the areas like product development, marketing, general business management and
accounting/finance were calculated and compared with a study of Berg-Utby et al.
(2007). As mentioned in the VC survey, the categorization of the functional areas as used
in the study of Berg-Utby et al. (2007) was supported with the discriminant validity and
internal consistency is provided with composite reliability as well as Cronbach’s alpha.
For studying the satisfaction level of the entrepreneurs, Kruskal-Wallis test was
performed with a null hypothesis that there was no significant difference in the
83
satisfaction level of the entrepreneurs of the ventures with VC exit, partial VC exit and
the ventures where still GVFL holds investment. With respect to the perceptions of
entrepreneurs regarding VCs in general, weighted average mean scores were computed
for each of the positive and negative statements.
Finally, the entrepreneurs were asked whether they have any plans for expansion in
further and if so, whether they will prefer to approach the same VC. For analyzing these
nominally scaled variables again simpler frequency tabulations were used.
(C) For Studying the Funding Preferences of Young Entrepreneurs from Gujarat
(Demand Side)
The results of the study have been analysed with frequency tabulations, charts,
descriptive statistics and relevant statistical tests. It is worth noting here that, again due
to small sample size and the violation of the assumption of normality of data, distribution
free non-parametric tests, specifically, Mann-Whitney U Test and Wilcoxon Matched
Pair Signed Ranks Test were applied wherever possible. For studying the relationship
between the variables where there was a scope for applying the parametric tests, first of
all, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was run to detect whether the sampling distribution
follows a normal distribution. The application of these tests has been discussed herein
detail. SPSS 12 is applied for analysis of the data.
Various demographic and social variables and venture specific details, as mentioned
before in the details of the questionnaire, were analysed simply with frequency
tabulations, percentages and bar charts. As majority of these variables are non-metric by
nature, application of statistics test was not possible here. This study like the study of VC
supported entrepreneurs, also had two kinds of entrepreneurs i.e. entrepreneurs with
family business background and entrepreneurs without such backup. So, for studying the
relationship between the family business background and the support of family members,
Mann-Whitney U test was performed.
For analyzing the sources of funds used at the initial stages, frequency tabulations and
percentages were applied. And the ratio between the promoters’ contribution viz a viz
other sources of financing, was analysed with the descriptive statistics. For those
84
entrepreneurs who had not availed any sort of external funding, the reasons for the same
were analysed again with the help of frequency and percentages. For use of business plan
competitions and bootstrapping techniques as described in the previous section,
frequency and percentage analysis have been used. These variables were again
categorical.
For comparing the awareness of these entrepreneurs regarding the equity investment
options, particularly, angel capital and venture capital, Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed
Ranks test was applied. Here also, the familiarity of the entrepreneurs regarding angel
capital and venture capital was measured as metric variable. Further, the familiarity of
these entrepreneurs with respect to angel capital was compared with the familiarity of the
VC supported entrepreneurs with the help of Mann-Whitney U test. These two groups
were not compared for venture capital as it is quite obvious that the VC supported
entrepreneurs know very well about this option as compared to non-VC supported
entrepreneurs.
Further, the perceptions of these entrepreneurs for equity investors were analysed with
the help of descriptive statistics. Besides, these rating of perceptions were compared with
the similar rating by VC baked entrepreneurs with the help of Mann-Whitney U test. In
case of those entrepreneurs who had availed bank funding for their ventures, the reasons
for availing the same were analysed with frequency tabulation and percentages. And the
experience of the entrepreneurs with respect to various parameters of baking services
were analysed again with the descriptive statistics. Finally, the willingness of the
entrepreneurs to expand their operation in future, preferred sources of funding for the
same and willingness to approach investors in Gujarat or Outside Gujarat have been
analysed with frequency and percentages.
The scheme of ther esearch methodology for all the three studies has been compiled in
the following table.
85
Table 3.4 Scheme of Research Methodology Sr. No.
Research Plan
Indian Venture Capitalists’
Survey
Entrepreneurs with VC Funding
Entrepreneurs Without VC
Funding 1 Research
Problem/ Objectives
Study of venture capital investment process, specifically characteristics of VC firms, investment policy variables, pre-investment and post-investment activities and divestment mechanism.
Study of the role played by the venture capitalists in the development of the venture along with profiling and use of early stage financing options by the entrepreneurs in Gujarat
Study of the funding preferences of new age entrepreneurs in Gujarat along with profiling and use of early stage financing options by them.
2 Research Design
Descriptive Descriptive Descriptive
3 Data Sources
Primary and secondary data
Primary and secondary data
Primary data
4 Research Approach
Survey approach. Survey approach. Survey approach.
5 Research Instrument
Questionnaires and telephonic interviews
Questionnaires, personal and telephonic interviews
Questionnaires, personal and telephonic interviews
6 Sampling Unit
Venture capital firms operating in
India.
Entrepreneurial ventures that have
availed VC funding in Gujarat.
High-growth entrepreneurial
ventures without venture capital
funding in Gujarat. 7 Respondents Members of
management team of such VC firms specifically fund
managers.
Members of management team of
these ventures specifically CEOs, managing directors
and finance executives
Promoters/Owners heading these
ventures.
8 Sample Size 38 VC firms in India.
22 Entrepreneurial ventures in Gujarat.
43 Entrepreneurial ventures in Gujarat.
(Contd.)
86
Sr. No.
Research Plan
Indian Venture Capitalists’
Survey
Entrepreneurs with VC Funding
Entrepreneurs Without VC
Funding 9 Sampling
Procedure Compilation of own list of VC firms through various sources and approaching each of them for survey
Compiling list of firms funded by VCs in Gujarat, mainly GVFL and approaching each of them for survey.
Compiling list of firms from various sources like the students of entrepreneurship courses at NIRMA University and EDI, Incubates availing the facility of the incubation centres, the nominees of Hottest Startups on NEN, list of startups from Plugged in, the entrepreneurs who had approached GVFL for funding, placement cell data of various management institutes, members of HeadStart group, references from existing startups and newspaper articles; and then approaching each of them for survey.
10 Contact Method
Emails and telephone
Personal interviews, emails and telephone.
Personal interviews, emails and telephone.
11 Data Analysis Tools
Frequency tabulations, descriptive statistics, non-Parametric test like Mann-Whitney U test, Friedman test and Kruskal-Wallis test
Frequency tabulations, descriptive statistics, non-Parametric test like Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed Ranks test, Friedman test and Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman’s correlation
Frequency tabulations, descriptive statistics, non-parametric test like Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Matched Pair Signed Ranks test.
87
3.4 Conclusion
This chapter on research methodology describes various methodological steps involved
in carrying out this study. An overview about the research design, data collection
sources and methods, sampling procedure and data analysis plan helps to understand the
research approach used. For all the three studies as discussed in the chapter descriptive
research design was used. A survey of venture capitalists across India and the
entrepreneurs (with and without VC funding) from Guajart was conducted based upon
the structured questionnaires. The respondents were contacted through emails, telephone
calls and personal visits wherever possible. The data collected were quantitatively
analysed with frequency tabulations, charts, descriptive statistics and certain non-
parametric tests. A brief on different variables of interest and their appearance in the
venture capitalists’ and pentrepreneurs’ questionnaires provides direction for data
analysis. The next chapter analyses the global scenario of venture capital industry based
upon secondary data.