Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

download Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

of 38

Transcript of Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    1/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-1

    Chapter 3

    Stakeholders and Corporate

    Social Responsibility

    Understanding Business Ethics

    Stanwick and Stanwick1st Edition

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    2/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-2

    Ethical Thoughts

    A business that makes nothing but money

    is a poor kind of business.

    Henry Ford, founder of Ford Motor Company

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    3/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-3

    When is Fair Trade Not Fair Trade?

    Fair trade log represents that farmers have

    received a fair wage for their work through

    the higher prices that were charged for the

    product

    Fair Trade products are available at 16

    national retailers, including Sams Club,

    Kroger, Wegmans, Whole Foods Market(www.transfairusaa.org)

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    4/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-4

    When is Fair Trade Not Fair Trade?

    Underlying questions:

    Where does the

    additional money for

    every pound of coffeego?

    What about the fixed

    rates for pounds of

    coffee?

    Costa Coffee took

    advantage of the Fair

    Trade image by

    adding 18 cents toevery cup of coffee,

    even though fair trade

    coffee only cost them

    between one and twocents extra per cup

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    5/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-5

    Stakeholder Theory Development

    Berle

    all the powers given to a corporation are to be

    used to create benefits to the interests of the

    shareholders

    Argued that managers within a corporation

    should consider themselves trustees and

    guardians of the investments made by theshareholders

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    6/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-6

    Stakeholder Theory Development

    Dodd:

    Not only should the interests of the shareholders be

    considered, but corporations also need to recognize

    their obligations to the community, to their workers,and to the consumers

    Argued that corporations are allowed to become legal

    entities because they serve a purpose to the

    community instead of just providing opportunities for

    financial gain by its owners.

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    7/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-7

    Stakeholder Theory Development

    Friedman

    The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase

    its Profits

    Argued that in a free market system in which peopleare allowed to own property, the executives of the

    company need to be considered as the employees of

    the shareholders

    Argued that the only social responsibility that amanager has is to ensure that the companys

    resources are optimized to enhance the level of

    profitability of the firm

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    8/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-8

    Stakeholder Theory Development

    Freeman

    Believed a stakeholder was any individual or

    group that can impact or be impacted by the

    actions of the firm

    Definition encompasses any individual or

    group that has a vested interest in the

    operations of the firm

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    9/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-9

    Stakeholders

    Any group that has a vested interest in the

    operations of the firm

    Include: employees, suppliers, stockholders,

    customers, the government, local

    communities, and society as a whole

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    10/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-10

    Moral Managers

    Defines a managers response to

    stakeholders three approaches

    Immoral

    not only does not care how his/her decisions

    impact the stakeholders, but the actions are

    actively counter to what is the right and ethical

    thing to do

    Focus only on the goals of the of the company

    Considers laws as constants or barriers that are

    ignored in the company

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    11/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-11

    Moral Managers

    Defines a managers response to

    stakeholders three approaches

    Amoral

    Manager who is considered ethically neutral

    Ethical considerations are not contemplated in the

    decision making process

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    12/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-12

    Moral Managers

    Defines a managers response to

    stakeholders three approaches

    Moral

    Those managers who understand the relevance of

    considering ethical issues when they are making

    decisions

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    13/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-13

    Lessons to be learned from

    Stakeholder theory from literature1. Corporations are facing increasing pressures

    to respond to their stakeholders

    2. Corporations have a legal basis for respondingto a wide range of stakeholders

    3. Corporations are being led by executives nolonger guided by the principles of theirprofessions

    4. Corporations respond to powerful stakeholders

    with legitimate, urgent claims5. Corporations can improve the bottom line by

    responding to stakeholder concerns

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    14/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-14

    Identifying Stakeholder

    Accountability

    Power: the extent to which the organization can

    influence or impose its will on the stakeholder

    group

    Legitimacy: the assumption that the actions ofthe corporation are desirable, proper or

    appropriate within the limits of the corporation

    Urgency: the degree to which the issues raised

    by the stakeholder must be dealt with in a time

    sensitive manner

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    15/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-15

    Stakeholder Impact on

    Organization

    1. Stakeholders establish expectations (explicit orimplicit) about corporate performance

    2. Stakeholders experience the effects of

    corporate behaviors3. Stakeholders evaluate the effects of corporatebehaviors on their interests or reconcile theeffects of those behaviors with their

    expectations.4. Stakeholders act upon their interests,

    expectations, experiences, and evaluations.

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    16/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-16

    2007 GE Citizenship Report

    Our engagement efforts seek to communicatewith a diverse set of stakeholders on mattersthat affect global business. Every year, GE hostshundreds of investor meetings, multi-stakeholder

    dialogues and roundtable discussions to solicitfeedback and share insights with non-governmental organizations, industry andfinancial analysts, community leaders,customers, suppliers and employees.

    http://www.ge.com/company/citizenship/stakeholder/index.html

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    17/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-17

    Ford Motor Company

    Our stakeholders those who affect Ford or areaffected by us are numerous. A closer look,however, shows that we have sustained,interdependent relationships with several distinct

    categories of stakeholders: our employees,customers, dealers, suppliers, investors andcommunities. Also important is our relationshipto "society," including government,nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and

    academia. http://www.ford.com/aboutford/microsites/sustainabilit

    y-report-2006-07/relContextStakeholders.htm

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    18/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-18

    Stakeholder Communications

    Vision and mission statements

    Open houses

    Public service announcements Public newsletters

    Town meetings

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    19/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-19

    Triple Bottom Line Reporting

    Expands traditional financial reporting to

    include environmental and social reporting

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    20/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-20

    Stakeholders: Employees

    Firm wants to attract, select and retain thebest qualified employees

    Corporate culture can provide an

    advantage in this selection process Research supports that the more

    dissatisfied the employee, the more likely

    the employee will engage in unethicalbehavior

    See page 41 in text for inconsistentmessages sent to employees

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    21/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-21

    Stakeholders: Employees

    Employees, no matter what rank, should beempowered to do the right thing and become anethical leader.

    Treatment of employees considered in severalgovernment regulations: Equal Pay Act of 1963

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

    Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

    Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    22/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-22

    Stakeholders: Suppliers

    Many companies want their suppliers todemonstrate the same commitment to ethicalissues that they themselves do.

    Example: Intels Suppler Ethics Expectations: The supplier must be in strict compliance with the law The supplier must have respect for competition

    The supplier must not have any actual or perceivedconflicts of interest with any other party

    Outsourcing assigning a function or task thatwas previously done within a company to anexternal third party

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    23/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-23

    Stakeholders: Customers

    Critical areas in which ethical behavior

    must be the norm for customers to support

    the business

    The manufacturing process

    Sales and quotes

    Distribution

    Customer service

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    24/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-24

    Stakeholders: Government

    Derives from compliance issues

    Government has the authority to punish

    the firm through fines and possible prison

    sentences for employees

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    25/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-25

    Stakeholders: Local Community

    and Society

    Focuses on quality of life issues

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    26/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-26

    Corporate Social Responsibility

    The obligation companies have to develop

    and implement courses of action that aid

    in social issues that impact society

    Legal responsibility, fiduciary duty, legitimacy,

    and charitable contributions

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    27/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-27

    Components of CSR

    Economic Responsibilities

    Based on the underlying foundation of why a firm has

    been creates, which is to develop economic value

    Firm has a responsibility to use the resourcesavailable to produce goods and services for society

    Examples: maximizing earnings per share,

    generating a high and consistent level of profitability,

    establishing and maintaining a strong competitive

    position, operating the firm at a high efficiency level

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    28/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-28

    Components of CSR

    Legal Responsibilities

    The laws and regulations that all firms are

    expected to abide by as they perform their

    daily functions. Examples: operating consistent with

    government and legal expectations;

    displaying complete compliance with all

    regulations

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    29/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-29

    Components of CSR

    Ethical Responsibilities

    Change over time because they are based on

    expectations of society

    Examples: meeting expectations of bothsocial and ethical norms; ability to adapt to

    new or evolving ethical and moral norms;

    being a good corporate citizen

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    30/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-30

    Components of CSR

    Discretionary Responsibilities

    Those responsibilities in which society does not have

    a clear message to present to businesses as to what

    their courses of action should be

    Left in the hands of managers to make the proper

    judgment

    Examples: giving to charitable organizations;

    providing drug treatment programs; providing day

    care centers

    These are not considered unethical if they do not

    participate in these discretionary responsibilities

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    31/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-31

    Strategic Response to Social

    Issues

    Varies from firm to firm

    Constant debate about who thecorporation should be responsible to and

    what the corporation is responsible for Challenge is determining what extent of

    responsibility should be to each of

    stakeholder groups Feelings of trust and confidence must beestablished with stakeholder groups

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    32/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-32

    Ten Commandments of Social

    Responsibility1. Thou shalt be proactive in taking action to correct

    problems before they impact the company

    2. Thou shalt seek input from all impacted stakeholdersin any problem that needs to be addressed

    3. Thou shalt use industry standards as a benchmark andvoluntarily internally regulate our corporate behavior

    4. Thou shalt admit to the public when mistakes havetaken place

    5. Thou shalt be active in supporting community socialprograms

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    33/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-33

    Ten Commandments of Social

    Responsibility

    6. Thou shalt be active in ensuring environmentalsustainability in the actions of the company

    7. Thou shalt be aware of any changes that occurin the corporate social environment

    8. Thou shalt establish and maintain a formalcorporate code of conduct

    9. Thou shalt be committed to publicly supporting

    social causes10. Thou shalt be profitable to financially support

    the companys social responsibility agenda

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    34/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-34

    Benefits from integrating CSR into

    Operations

    Better risk and crisis management

    Good relations with stakeholders and interested

    communities

    Increased worker commitment

    Increased productivity

    Reduced operating costs

    Enhanced brand value and reputation Long term sustainability for the company and

    society

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    35/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-35

    The Role of Human Rights

    Four positive reasons for promoting humanrights:

    1. Respecting human rights enhances workerproductivity and management creativity it raises

    enterprise profitability2. Promoting rights opens markets

    3. Promoting respect for human rights goes hand inhand with development of rule law

    4. Promoting respect for human rights is good for acompanys image, both at home and in the hostcountry

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    36/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-36

    Social Accountability 8000

    Certification

    Provides a way for companies to ensure thatthey are offering a humane workplace Child labor

    Forced labor

    Health and safety

    Freedom of association and right to collectivebargaining

    Discrimination

    Discipline

    Working hours

    Compensation

    Management systems

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    37/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-37

    Questions for Thought

    Evaluate the Johnson & Johnson credo byresearching the Tylenol Scare.

    When examining the working conditions in

    countries other than the United States,what ethically should be done to helpchange these conditions?

    When reviewing the notion of humanrights, why would this be considered anethical issue? Explain.

  • 7/28/2019 Chapter 3 Ppt Slides Corp Soc Resp

    38/38

    Copyright 2009 Pearson Education Inc publishing as Prentice Hall 3 38

    All rights reserved. No part of this publicationmay be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,

    or transmitted, in any form or by any means,

    electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,or otherwise, without the prior written permissionof the publisher. Printed in the United States of

    America.