Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports · Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports 3-1 General This chapter...
Transcript of Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports · Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports 3-1 General This chapter...
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-1 January 2020
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
3-1 GeneralThis chapter provides guidelines to inspect bridges*, including documentation.
The guidelines presented herein are those in use by the WSDOT Bridge Preservation Office (BPO). Local Agencies are encouraged to follow these guidelines so as to provide a consistent basis for evaluation and reporting of inspection data. Coding for non-mandatory items may deviate according to the needs of an individual agency. Agencies are encouraged to document such deviations in a manner so as to aid in the evaluation of the associated inspection data.
The basis for bridge inspection policies and procedures are referenced throughout the chapter by the updated versions of the two following manuals: The AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation (MBE), Section 4, provides uniformity in the procedures and policies for determining the physical condition, maintenance needs, and load capacity of the nation’s highway bridges.
The FHWA NHI 12-049 Bridge Inspector’s Reference Manual (BIRM) is a manual on programs, procedures, and techniques for inspecting and evaluating a variety of in-service bridges. It provides guidelines regarding what preparation is necessary, how to inspect, what to look for, what equipment and tools are needed, how to document the results of the inspections, and provide appropriate follow-up to the inspection.
Depending on the inspection type, bridges submitted to the NBI and NTI have regular inspection intervals that must adhere to the intervals as defined within the NBIS and NTIS. When a bridge is inspected late, the agency must document a justifiable cause that pushed the inspection beyond the required interval. The justifiable cause, identified as an unusual circumstance in the preamble of the NBIS and NTIS regulation, should be documented within the inspection report. Some examples of unusual circumstances are as follows: severe weather, concern for inspector safety, concern for inspection quality, the need to optimize scheduling with other bridges, or other unique situations. The agency must also ensure that the next inspection is scheduled for the original inspection month during subsequent inspection cycles.
*Bridge is intended to mean all reportable structures which includes bridges, culverts and tunnels.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3-2 Inspection Types and ReportingA number of different types of inspections have been developed to address specific needs. This section will identify and describe the inspection types used by both the state and local agencies. Below is a list of inspection types followed by a description of each inspection/report type.
• Routine (A)• Fracture Critical (B)• Underwater (C)• Special Feature (D)• Interim (E)• Underwater Interim (F)• Damage (G)• Primary Safety (H)• Secondary Safety (I)
• Condition Safety (J)• Short Span (K)• Two-Man UBIT (L)• Informational (M)• Inventory (N)• In-Depth (O)• Geometric (P)• Feature (Q)
(A) Routine
1. Initial Routine Inspection – The first routine inspection performed on any bridge is the Initial Routine Inspection. It verifies the data entered into BridgeWorks via the “Inventory” Report type. An Initial Routine Inspection is also performed after rehabilitation work that changes a bridge’s dimensions or clearances, or when there is a change in bridge ownership. The initial inspection is the first inspection of a bridge and is typically reported to the NBI and NTI as a Routine inspection.
The purpose of this inspection is to add the bridge to the inventory of bridges and to establish certain baseline information.
a. GatheringInventoryData – Establishing baseline information about the bridge from the original construction plans or as-built plans can be performed in the office prior to the site inspection. Agencies shall record the required WSBIS data into BridgeWorks along with the applicable Bridge Management System (BMS) elements for the structure. Any information not known or which cannot be determined from the plans can be left blank until the site inspection.
Depending on the type of structure built, one or more of the following inspection types may also be required to be performed with the initial inspection:
• A Fracture Critical Inspection if the bridge contains fracture critical members, see (B) Fracture Critical.
• An Underwater Inspection is needed to inspect underwater portions of the bridge, see (F) Underwater Interim Inspection.
• A Special Features inspection if the bridge contains unique design or construction elements, see (D) Special Feature.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-3 January 2020
Conclusions and findings from these items should be incorporated into the Bridge Inspection Report (BIR) to support the applicable codes and ratings.
Team Leaders should coordinate the planning and timing of the inspection with the appropriate project or construction offices prior to visiting the site.
b. Site Inspection – After the bridge has been built, and preferably before it is placed into service, the Team Leader must visit the bridge site to verify the inventory information that has been coded and to establish any information that was not known. At the bridge site, the Team Leader can review the information to confirm the actual bridge dimensions and clearance measurements and to verify the condition of all bridge elements.
Changes or additions to the WSBIS data, the BIR form, or BMS elements, must be noted on the inspection form and entered into BridgeWorks.
c. Check Coding – The BIR form should note any inconsistencies found between the planned and the as-built bridge and should provide an explanation of any coding changes made. For example, if surface cracks have been found in a newly-poured bridge deck but these cracks do not warrant lowering the condition coding for the deck, the Team Leader should note the location and extent of the cracking so that it can be looked for and further evaluated during future inspections.
As part of the Initial Routine Inspection, two photographs of the bridge shall be taken: an elevation and a deck photograph. The elevation photograph should be taken (looking north or east) when possible to show a view from one side of the bridge. The deck photograph should be taken (ahead on station) to show a view of the bridge looking onto the bridge deck.
See (A) Routine for instructions on completing the remainder of the BIR form.
d. Updating the Bridge File – The Inventory Record, the BIR, and the two photographs provide a record of the Initial Routine Inspection. In addition to being stored within BridgeWorks, these items must be placed in the bridge file created for the given bridge. Each time the bridge is revisited, additional inspection reports, any new photos, and any updates to the WSBIS and to the BIR form are added to the file so that the bridge records remain current. See Section 2-2 for further details.
2. Routine Inspections – Routine Inspections are regularly scheduled inspections consisting of observations, measurements, or both, needed to determine the physical and functional condition of the bridge, to identify any changes from “Initial” or previously recorded conditions, and to ensure that the structure continues to satisfy present service requirements. Generally, a regular inspection of the entire bridge is to be performed on regular intervals not to exceed 24 months throughout the life of the bridge. However, the NBIS does allow for extended inspection frequencies of up to 48 months provided the bridge meets specific criteria submitted by the State and approved in writing by the FHWA. Inspection intervals less than 24 months for specific reasons can be developed and documented by the inspecting agency if necessary. Routine Inspections are reported to the NBI and NTI.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-4 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
a. Inspecting Bridge Components – The BIRM describes the general inspection procedures to be followed for inspecting any concrete, steel, or timber bridge, and the specific procedures to follow for inspecting a given bridge element (i.e., the bridge abutments). These steps can be used by the Team Leader as a checklist to help accomplish the inspection and to help spot particular types of problems a given bridge or bridge element will be prone to. Following these procedures will help ensure that a thorough and comprehensive inspection is achieved.
However, specific problems not covered in these general procedures may be encountered. If that is the case, the Team Leader may contact their respective WSDOT Bridge Program Support personnel.
b. Inspecting for Scour – The Routine Inspection of any bridge over water should include an assessment of existing scour conditions, the effect of scour on the bridge, effectiveness of countermeasures, and recommendations for repair, if appropriate. The following manuals, as well as the BIRM, discuss inspection procedures for bridges over water:
• HEC 18 Evaluating Scour at Bridges
The field inspection is used in conjunction with the scour analysis, see Section 5-3, to identify and verify the potential of harmful effects of scour to the bridge.
The field inspection includes the specific location and extent of any deterioration, damage, or undermining in:
• The stream channel and stream banks.
• The substructure elements (i.e., intermediate piers, pier walls, web walls, columns, or shafts).
• The foundation (i.e., footings and seals).
• Channel protection devices (i.e., dams and levees).
• Scour countermeasures (i.e., riprap or shielding).
Measure and record the extent of foundation exposure and undermining.
Recommend any repairs, replacement, or maintenance required.
Perform soundings on bridges as identified by the Scour Engineer using the Scour Field Evaluation form.
The Scour Field Evaluation form was developed to supplement the BIR for water crossings by measuring the streambed cross-section (soundings) at a bridge to document observations related to scour. A copy of this form is shown in Section 3-5.
Soundings of streambed elevations should be taken during the Initial Routine Inspection and during subsequent inspections as required. The form should note the location and depth of the streambed at each point where a sounding was taken. This information should then be plotted in order to identify long term changes in the channel cross section over time.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-5 January 2020
c. Bridge Inspection Report – A Bridge Inspection Report must be prepared at the completion of each Routine Inspection to record the inspection findings, provide a narrative description of conditions at the bridge site, and note any changes in the WSBIS coding information. The Team Leader shall record and submit the findings of the Routine Inspection into BridgeWorks. A Routine Inspection will be included with a Fracture Critical Inspection and a Special Feature Inspection. Bridge Inspection Reports must be completed within 90 days from the start of the inspection. A completed report is defined as a report that has been “Released” in the BridgeWorks program.
The Bridge Inspection Report form will have the following preprinted information that will identify the bridge:
• Bridge Number – The bridge number given by the owner agency that is associated with the particular structure.
• Bridge Name – The bridge name given by the owner agency that is associated with the particular structure.
• Structure ID – The unique federal structure identification number associated with the particular structure in the NBI and NTI assigned by WSDOT for the life of the bridge.
• Route – The number of the inventory route carried on or under the bridge.
• Milepost – The bridge’s milepost location on the inventory route.
• Intersecting – The feature or features which intersect with the bridge.
• Location – The physical location of the bridge.
• Structure Type – The structure type (for local agency bridges, this field may be blank).
d. Completing the Bridge Inspection Report
(1) At the conclusion of the Routine Inspection, confirm the condition and adequacy coding for the various bridge elements and make any changes as necessary. Review the Adequacy Appraisal codes, NBI condition codes, BMS and SNTI elements and their respective condition states, and complete the narrative describing the existing conditions. Verify that the correct Program Manager is listed on the inspection report.
(2) Enter onto the inspection report: Team Leader initials, Team Leader identification number, Assistant Inspector initials, date of inspection, and total number of crew hours at the bridge site. The Team Leader and Assistant Inspector are required to sign the approved and released copy of the BIR that is placed in the bridge file.
(3) Prepare a list of any bridge elements in need of repair and recommend the type of repair that should be done. A photo of repair areas should be taken with each type of recommended repair. See Section 6-4 for additional repair instructions and procedures.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-6 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
(4) If it is determined that a critical bridge deficiency has been identified resulting in an emergency load restriction, lane closure, bridge closure or a failed bridge, a Damage Inspection and/or a subsequent In-Depth Inspection may have to be performed, see (G) Damage for Damage Inspections, and (O) In-Depth for In-Depth Inspections.
e. Updating the Inventory Record – Any changes that need to be made to the Inventory Record shall be entered into BridgeWorks.
After the data is processed and updated, a new Inventory Record is generated for each bridge that has changes. On all Routine Inspections, all changes/updates to NBI and NTI data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection.
The updated SI&A Report and other applicable reports shall be filed in their respective bridge file.
3. Routine Inspections with Extended Intervals – Routine Inspections with extended inspection intervals are structures with inspection frequencies greater than 24 months not exceeding 48 months, and only with written FHWA approval. Reportable structures that have administrative load ratings (WSBIS ITEM NUMBERS 1551 & 1554 = 0) are not eligible for 48 month frequencies.
The criteria approved by FHWA shall be re-evaluated after every inspection. Refer to the WSDOT letter sent to FHWA, dated July 28, 1998, see Appendix 3-C for further details. The Coding and Appraisal Unit will run an automated check annually on the entire database to ensure that the extended inspection interval is still valid and meets the criteria agreed upon between FHWA and WSDOT. Team Leaders for the State shall place the following note in the zero (0) note of the BIR within BridgeWorks for existing extended interval bridges and candidate bridges:
“Continue to validate the status of this bridge each inspection as a 48-month inspection candidate. Verify condition ratings, load ratings, vertical clearances, ADT, scour codes when applicable, and that no major maintenance has been completed in the last two years.”
The procedures and guidelines used for Routine Inspections at 24 month intervals shall be used for these structures as well.
4. Routine Inspections with Frequencies Less than 24 Months – Bridges or culverts should be considered for more frequent inspections if the NBI Superstructure, Substructure or Culvert code is equal to or less than a 3 and where there are multiple elements with deficiencies that reduce capacity. The SPM will approve the need to perform routine inspections more frequently than 24 months.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-7 January 2020
(B) Fracture Critical
The National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) require that a Fracture Critical Inspection be performed on regular intervals not to exceed 24 months on bridge members identified as fracture critical. According to the MBE, a fracture critical member (FCM) is a steel tension member in a bridge whose failure could result in the partial or total collapse of the bridge.
This section provides information to assist the Team Leader in identifying fracture critical bridge members, preparing written procedures, planning and performing effective Fracture Critical Inspections and completing the required inspection report. The information presented here is meant as a summary of the main points of the Fracture Critical Inspection. A complete description of fracture critical members and Fracture Critical Inspection procedures are provided in the BIRM. Fracture Critical Inspections are reported to the NBI.
1. General – Each agency shall identify the bridges within its jurisdiction which contain fracture critical members. The agency can then identify, through documentation, the particular fracture critical members within each bridge. For the member to be considered fracture critical, two conditions must exist.
a. The member must be a steel member in tension. The area of the bridge where the member is located is subject to tensioning (expanding) forces.
b. There is no redundancy in the member or the bridge. There must be no other structural elements able to carry the load of the member if the given member fails.
There are three types of redundancy: load path, structural, and internal. Only load path redundancy is evaluated to determine whether a member is fracture critical. Load path redundancy is the number of supporting elements, usually parallel, such as girders or trusses. AASHTO neglects structural and internal redundancies in determining whether a member is fracture critical. For a bridge to be redundant, it must have more than two load paths. An exception to this is where steel three girder systems have pin and hangers. In this case, the pin and hangers are fracture critical.
2. Bridge Types – The following is a list of the types of bridges in which fracture critical members will be found. Figures are also shown which illustrate these bridge types and note the location of the fracture critical areas.
a. SteelTwo-BeamorTwo-GirderSystems(Exhibit 3-1)
(1) Simple Spans – Each beam or girder should be considered fracture critical as failure of either one could cause the bridge to collapse (Example A).
(2) Continuous Spans – In general, at the midpoint of the span, the bottom of the girder should be considered fracture critical and over the pier, the top of the girder should be considered fracture critical. A structural engineer may need to assess the bridge to determine the actual redundancy and presence of fracture critical elements (Example B).
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-8 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
(3) Cantilever-Suspended Span – In addition to the bottom of the girder at mid-span and the top of the girder over the pier, the top flange and adjacent portion of the web in the area of the cantilevered support should be considered fracture critical (Example C).
Exhibit 3-1 Steel Two-Beam or Two-Girder SystemsExample A: Simple Beam
Example B: Continuous Spans
Example C: Cantilever - Suspended Spans
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-9 January 2020
b. Steel Truss Systems (Exhibit 3-2) – Most truss bridges employ only two trusses and are thus considered fracture critical. All truss members in tension should be regarded as fracture critical. The exception is, when a detailed analysis by an experienced structural engineer, verifies loss of a member would not result in collapse of the bridge or major component.
The following elements within any truss bridge should also warrant special attention:
(1) Pin-Connections – Any load bearing pin connection in a fracture critical member or steel three girder system is considered fracture critical.
(2) Category D and E Welds – On a truss bridge, any tension member containing a Category D or E weld.
Exhibit 3-2 Steel Truss Systems
Inspections and Reports
Page 3-18 Washington State Bridge Inspection ManualJanuary 2002
b. Truss Systems (Figure 3.05.C-2)
Most truss bridges employ only two trusses and are thus consideredfracture critical. For inspectors, all truss members in tension should beregarded as fracture critical. The exception is, when a detailed analysisby an experienced structural engineer, varifies loss of a member wouldnot result in collapse of the bridge or major component.
The following elements within any truss bridge should also warrantspecial attention:
(1) Pin-connections: Any pin connections on a truss bridge should beconsidered fracture critical.
(2) Category D and E Welds: On a truss bridge, any tension membercontaining a Category D or E weld. (See Inspecting Steel Bridgesfor Fatigue Damage published by Pennsylvania DOT.)
c. Tied Arches (Figure 3.05.C-3)
The tie girder which keeps the supports from spreading apart is in tensionand should be considered fracture critical.
Tied Arch BridgeFigure 3.05.C-3
Truss SystemFigure 3.05.C-2
c. Tied Arches (Exhibit 3-3) – The tie girder which keeps the supports from spreading apart is in tension and should be considered fracture critical.
Exhibit 3-3 Tied Arches
Inspections and Reports
Page 3-18 Washington State Bridge Inspection ManualJanuary 2002
b. Truss Systems (Figure 3.05.C-2)
Most truss bridges employ only two trusses and are thus consideredfracture critical. For inspectors, all truss members in tension should beregarded as fracture critical. The exception is, when a detailed analysisby an experienced structural engineer, varifies loss of a member wouldnot result in collapse of the bridge or major component.
The following elements within any truss bridge should also warrantspecial attention:
(1) Pin-connections: Any pin connections on a truss bridge should beconsidered fracture critical.
(2) Category D and E Welds: On a truss bridge, any tension membercontaining a Category D or E weld. (See Inspecting Steel Bridgesfor Fatigue Damage published by Pennsylvania DOT.)
c. Tied Arches (Figure 3.05.C-3)
The tie girder which keeps the supports from spreading apart is in tensionand should be considered fracture critical.
Tied Arch BridgeFigure 3.05.C-3
Truss SystemFigure 3.05.C-2
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-10 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
d. Suspension Spans (Exhibit 3-4)
(1) Cables – If the main suspension member is a cable, the cable should be considered fracture critical (Example A).
(2) Cable Stayed Bridge – The bridge is of such complexity that it should be reviewed by a structural engineer to determine the criticality of the various stays to fracture (Example B).
Exhibit 3-4 Suspension SpansExample A: Cable Suspension Bridge
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual Page 3-19January 2002
Inspections and Reports
d. Suspension Spans (Figure 3.05.C-4)
(1) Cables: If the main suspension member is a cable, the cable should beconsidered fracture critical. (Example A)
(2) Cable Stayed Bridge: The bridge is of such complexity that it shouldbe reviewed by a structural engineer to determine the criticality of thevarious ties to fracture. (Example B)
Possible FCM - Needs Analysis
Example B: Cable Suspension Bridge
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual Page 3-19January 2002
Inspections and Reports
d. Suspension Spans (Figure 3.05.C-4)
(1) Cables: If the main suspension member is a cable, the cable should beconsidered fracture critical. (Example A)
(2) Cable Stayed Bridge: The bridge is of such complexity that it shouldbe reviewed by a structural engineer to determine the criticality of thevarious ties to fracture. (Example B)
Possible FCM - Needs Analysis
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-11 January 2020
e. Other Fracture Critical Bridge Details
(1) Steel Cross Beams and Caps – Tension zones of the I section or box beam should be considered fracture critical (Exhibit 3-5).
Exhibit 3-5 Steel Cross Beams and Caps
Inspections and Reports
Page 3-20 Washington State Bridge Inspection ManualJanuary 2002
e. Other Fracture Critical Bridge Details
(1) Steel Cross Beams and Caps: In mid-span, the lower portion of theI-section or box beam is in tension and should be considered fracturecritical. (Figure 3.05.C-5)
Steel Cross BeamFigure 3.05.C-5
(2) Pin and Hanger Supports: The pin and hanger connection used tosupport a suspended span from a cantilever span should be consideredfracture critical if the member is nonredundant. The pin connection andhanger support in a two-girder or three-girder system is fracture criticalas the bridge has no built in redundancy. The same connections in amulti-beam system are not fracture critical as the bridge has a highdegree of redundancy. However, due to the poor performance of pinsin multi-beam suspended spans, the pin connections in such bridgesshould be inspected as if it were fracture critical. (Figure 3.05.C-6)
Pin and HangerFigure 3.05.C-6
(2) Pin and Hanger Supports – The pin and hanger connection used to support a suspended span from a cantilever span should be considered fracture critical if the member is non-redundant. The pin connection and hanger support in a two-girder or three-girder system is fracture critical as the bridge has no built in redundancy. The same connections in a multi-beam system (more than 3 beams) are not fracture critical as the bridge has a high degree of redundancy. Pin connections in such bridges should be inspected with the same techniques and methods as fracture critical pins (Exhibit 3-6).
Exhibit 3-6 Pin and Hanger Supports
Inspections and Reports
Page 3-20 Washington State Bridge Inspection ManualJanuary 2002
e. Other Fracture Critical Bridge Details
(1) Steel Cross Beams and Caps: In mid-span, the lower portion of theI-section or box beam is in tension and should be considered fracturecritical. (Figure 3.05.C-5)
Steel Cross BeamFigure 3.05.C-5
(2) Pin and Hanger Supports: The pin and hanger connection used tosupport a suspended span from a cantilever span should be consideredfracture critical if the member is nonredundant. The pin connection andhanger support in a two-girder or three-girder system is fracture criticalas the bridge has no built in redundancy. The same connections in amulti-beam system are not fracture critical as the bridge has a highdegree of redundancy. However, due to the poor performance of pinsin multi-beam suspended spans, the pin connections in such bridgesshould be inspected as if it were fracture critical. (Figure 3.05.C-6)
Pin and HangerFigure 3.05.C-6
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-12 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3. Prepare Written Procedures – Once the fracture critical members within a bridge have been identified, the agency must prepare a detailed plan as to how it will accomplish the Fracture Critical Inspection. This written procedure may be developed by others being hired to perform the Fracture Critical Inspection. However, if this is done, a qualified designee from the owner agency should carefully review the written plan to ensure that a sufficient analysis of the member will be made and that the task will be accomplished in a reasonable manner. These written inspection procedures are to be kept in each bridge file.
Fracture Critical Inspections can prove costly; therefore, in the development of the inspection plan, particular attention should be given to each of the following:
a. Scheduling – Generally, it will be best to schedule a Fracture Critical Inspection during cold weather (as cracks will be more visible), at low water (if the fracture critical member is underwater at high water), during daylight hours, and when traffic on the bridge will be lightest (as some form of traffic control may be necessary).
b. Equipment – The Team Leader will require close access to each fracture critical member; thus, some type of equipment may be needed to provide sufficient access. Ladders, scaffolding, aerial work platforms, or UBITs may be deemed appropriate for a given situation. The choice of equipment will depend on the cost of rental, the time needed to perform the inspection using that equipment, and equipment availability. If a UBIT is used, it should be determined, before its use, whether it could overload the bridge, operate on the bridge grade, has sufficient reach, and if it might damage the deck. Use of a UBIT may also create a need for traffic control.
c. Workforce – In order to keep the amount of time spent at the bridge site to a minimum, consideration should be given to the level of manpower needed. Once the number of individuals needed is determined, the duties to be performed by each individual should be clearly defined.
d. Tools – The standard tools common to any Routine Inspection should be on hand for the Fracture Critical Inspection. In particular, a wire brush, a magnifying glass, and a light source able to provide 50 to 100 lumens should be considered. In addition, specialized tools for carrying out nondestructive testing may also be warranted (i.e., a dye penetrant kit or ultrasonic testing device).
e. Inspection Procedures – The fracture critical member inspection plan should identify the inspection frequency and method(s) to be used. These should be developed depending on the criticality of the feature based on experience with other similar details or structures, calculated remaining fatigue life, current indications, material properties, consequences and likelihood of rapid failure, etc.
If several types of inspection are employed, identify when, where and how they are to be used. For example, a pinned truss bridge may require each of the pins to be examined visually during each inspection, supplemented by ultrasonic testing of 1/3 of the pins during each inspection. Therefore, all of the pins would be inspected ultrasonically in a 72-month period, if the inspection frequency was 24 months.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-13 January 2020
4. Perform the Fracture Critical Inspection – The purpose of the Fracture Critical Inspection is to assess the structural condition of each bridge member identified as fracture critical. When inspecting these members, it is always best to err on the side of conservatism. The consequences of dismissing or failing to note a blemish on a fracture critical member are too great. Therefore, the inspection should be conducted carefully and thoroughly. Such close inspection of single members can be tedious; however, the Team Leader should work in a manner that insures the same degree of care and attention to the last area inspected as the first. The previous pages described the general areas within a bridge where fracture critical members will be located. The following pages describe the particular features to note.
First, the Team Leader must gain access to the fracture critical area. The Team Leader should be no further than 24 inches from the surface being inspected and should work with a light source of at least 50 to 100 lumens. The best viewing angle is at approximately 120°. The Team Leader will want to look for deteriorated surfaces or surface cracks. The BIRM discusses inspection procedures and the types of problems that may be found.
The following areas or members should be checked:
• Areas vulnerable to corrosion (under deck joints, on surfaces where water collects and in places where dissimilar materials meet).
• Areas where there is a change in the bridge cross section, where stress is concentrated, or which show out-of-plane bending.
• Web stiffeners (especially at the ends).
• Coped sections and/or re-entrant corners.
• Eyebars.
• Shear connectors.
• Pin and hanger assemblies.
• Punched holes.
• Rivet and bolt heads.
• Tack welds and field welds (especially at weld ends or returns).
If any cracks, blemishes, or other irregularities are found, the Team Leader will need to evaluate these further, which may include the use of a magnifying glass. A dye penetrant kit can be used to establish the limits of a crack. Use of magnetic or ultrasonic testing devices may be required to detect internal problems not apparent to the eye. The agency will need to determine which devices will be the most cost effective and reliable for the given situation.
Finally, the Team Leader will need to record the location and size of any cracks found. Mark and date the crack ends in permanent marker for follow up on the structure. In most cases, it will be helpful to take a photograph of such cracks to provide visual documentation. This information and the photographs are to be included in the Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-14 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
5. Prepare the Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report – At the conclusion of the Fracture Critical Inspection, a Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report should be prepared to provide detailed verification of the inspection findings. The report should provide qualitative and quantitative information concerning the fracture critical member. This information is important for a number of reasons: it can offer insight about the condition of the member, it can provide a history of the bridge, and it can be used to substantiate the thoroughness of the inspection effort in the event of litigation arising from a bridge failure. See Section 3-5 for a copy of the Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report form.
The inspection report should:
• Identify what parts of the bridge were inspected and the location of each fracture critical bridge member. (This can be shown on a photograph or sketch of the bridge.)
• Describe the procedures followed to inspect the fracture critical member.
• Describe the condition of the fracture critical member.
• Provide the following details about any defects found:
– What the defect is.
– Where the defect is located (a sketch may be used to illustrate its location relative to the ends of the member, and its position in the cross section of the member).
– Summarize the inspection findings (addressing how individual defects affect the member’s overall condition).
– Make any appropriate recommendations (i.e., repair the fracture critical member, recalculate load ratings, close the bridge).
6. Updating the Inventory Record – Any changes that need to be made to the Inventory Record shall be entered into BridgeWorks.
On all Fracture Critical Inspections, all changes/updates to NBI data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection.
7. Updating the Bridge File – Place the signed and completed Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report within the bridge file. This report can be referred to if necessary to help determine the appropriate inspection frequency for the bridge, evaluate the degree to which bridge conditions have changed from one inspection to the next, and determine what maintenance or repair may be required on the bridge.
8. Fracture Critical Inspections with Frequencies Less than 24 Months – Fracture Critical Bridges should be considered for more frequent inspections if the NBI Superstructure or Substructure code is equal to or less than a 4 and where there are multiple elements with deficiencies that reduce capacity. The SPM will approve the need to perform Fracture Critical Inspections more frequently than 24 months.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-15 January 2020
(C) Underwater
Bridges over water have special inspection requirements. If the bridge has members in water too deep to permit a visual or tactile (hands-on and/or wading) inspection from the surface at low water or during seasonal low stream flows, an underwater bridge inspection diver must conduct an Underwater Inspection. An evaluation of the bridge’s susceptibility to scour also needs to be conducted, see Section 5-3. Many bridge failures are due to underwater or scour problems; therefore, the importance of these types of inspection cannot be overemphasized. There may be environmental restrictions that need to be taken into consideration prior to conducting an Underwater Inspection.
An Underwater Inspection of submerged bridge elements is required on an interval not to exceed 60 months. The purpose of the Underwater Inspection is to examine the underwater elements to the extent necessary to determine their structural condition and adequacy. At a minimum, an underwater bridge inspection diver must swim by and examine all underwater portions of the bridge. If the underwater elements are covered with marine growth, portions of the structure need to be cleaned in order to positively ascertain the condition of the element. For concrete piers, this consists of cleaning 1 square foot patches near the surface, mid height, and bottom of all piers. For multiple pile bents, a one foot band must be cleaned near the surface, mid-height and bottom of one pile per bent, but no less than 10 percent of the piles. The underwater bridge inspection diver must also perform a visual or tactile inspection of the entire bridge footing at ground line to identify if any undermining of the footing exists, as well as probing to determine if scour holes are being filled in. If significant problems are encountered during the course of the inspection, a more detailed inspection of the bridge may be needed.
Existing scour conditions must be evaluated during an Underwater Inspection. The Team Leader must assess condition and depth of the streambed, determine the susceptibility of the streambed to scour, and determine what countermeasures can be taken to safeguard the bridge. The primary requirement of the scour inspection is to establish a cross-section of the streambed. This is accomplished by sounding and can be carried out with either a fathometer (also known as a “fish finder”) or a lead line. See the BIRM and the MBE for guidance on performing Underwater Inspections. Underwater Inspections are reported to the NBI.
1. Prepare Written Procedures – Written inspection procedures need to be developed for each bridge requiring an underwater inspection. The inspection plan should detail as a minimum:
• Type and frequency of required inspection.
• Location of members to be inspected.
• Type(s) of foundation.
• Bottom of foundation elevation or pile tip elevation.
• Identification of scour critical substructure units.
• Special equipment requirements.
• Follow-up actions taken on findings of last inspection.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-16 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
2. Document the Underwater Inspection – Prepare a Daily Site Dive Log for each dive and prepare an Underwater Inspection Report when inspection of the entire underwater portion of the bridge is concluded.
a. Daily Site Dive Log – The Daily Site Dive Log must be completed by the inspection Team Leader (in concert with the diver). Section 3-5, provides a sample of the Daily Site Dive Log form. The form should summarize what equipment was used in the dive, what procedures were employed, what problems were encountered (such as strong currents or underwater obstructions or accumulations of debris), and should provide any information which may be helpful for planning future dives. At the conclusion of every dive, the diver must go over the inspection findings with the Team Leader in order to verify that the notes taken by the staff on the surface are a correct representation of what the diver found. The diver should also go over all underwater photos, making sure that the photo numbers and descriptions are correct.
b. Underwater Inspection Report – The Underwater Inspection Report must be completed by the underwater inspection Team Leader and reviewed by the diver. The report should be thorough and include the following information for the various levels of inspection performed.
(1) For a Routine Underwater Inspection, note:
• What conditions were found as a result of the visual inspection or cleaning.
• The condition of any protective coatings.
• Evidence of any significant defects or damage.
• Evidence of scour or the build-up of debris at the piers.
• The location of exposed foundation elements.
• Ground line elevations at the base of all piles or pile groups, elevations of the tops of all exposed footings and/or seals, and ground line elevations of all footings or seals at their corners.
• The condition of the streambed around each pier, including a description of any placed rock.
• The water flow (whether high, medium, or low) and an approximation of the velocity (ft/sec.).
• The influence of any significant environmental conditions (i.e., corrosive pollutants, salt water, etc.).
• Any changes to the surrounding area which have or may alter the flow characteristics around the pilings or piers (i.e., logs upstream, construction going on nearby).
• Any discrepancies between the bridge design and its actual configuration.
• Any recommendations for repairs, a subsequent scour inspection, a change in inspection frequency, or an in-depth inspection.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-17 January 2020
(2) For an Interim Inspection, note:
• The specific areas inspected.
• The amount and type of testing performed.
• Testing results and/or findings.
• Any recommendations for repair
In addition to the written information provided in the Underwater Inspection Report, problem areas in the bridge should be carefully identified and documented with drawings, photographs, and/or video recordings. Although underwater photos and video recordings are often preferred, they may not always offer clear views of the problem areas so sketches and drawings are always needed to document findings.
3. Updating the Inventory Record – Any changes to the applicable inventory coding information (the date of underwater inspection, Team Leader initials, inspection hours and changes to the condition coding for the substructure) shall be entered so that the Inventory Record can be updated accordingly. On all Underwater Inspections, all changes/updates to NBI data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection.
4. Updating the Bridge File – The completed Underwater Inspection Report and an updated copy of the Inventory Record shall be placed in the bridge file. These reports can be referenced to as necessary to help determine the appropriate inspection frequency for the bridge, to evaluate the degree to which bridge conditions have changes from one inspection to the next, and to determine what maintenance or repair may be required.
5. Underwater Inspections with Frequencies Less than 60 Months - Bridges that require an Underwater Inspection should be considered for more frequent inspections if the NBI Substructure code is equal to or less than a 4, or the Scour code is equal to or less than a 2 and where there are underwater elements with deficiencies that reduce capacity. The SPM will approve the need to perform Underwater Inspections more frequently than 60 months.
(D) Special Feature
Bridges with special features include structures such as movable bridges, floating bridges, suspension and cable-stayed bridges, and ferry terminals. Also included are bridges built with special materials such as high strength steel, and bridges that were built using techniques such as segmentally constructed post-tensioned concrete boxes. Bridges with pin and hanger connections are also considered to be special feature bridges. Written procedures must be developed and included in the bridge file for all Special Features Inspections. Procedures should include:
• Type, detail, and frequency of required inspection.
• The location of members to be inspected.
• Special equipment required.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-18 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
The first four bridge types listed below are considered “Complex Bridges” according to the NBIS. The remaining types are inspected as suggested by FHWA. See Appendix 3-D on FHWA letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections. Special Feature Inspections are performed on regular intervals not to exceed 24 months. Special Feature Inspections are reported to the NBI.
1. Movable Bridges (Code ‘1’ in BridgeWorks) – There are three basic types of movable bridges: vertical lifts, bascules, and swings. All of these structures are operated by either electro-mechanical drive systems or hydraulic systems. See the BIRM and the MBE for guidance on performing inspections on movable bridges.
2. Suspension Bridges (Code ‘3’ in BridgeWorks) – Suspension bridges consist of a pair of main cables hanging between and passing over two towers and anchored by backstays into large counterweights on opposite shores. Suspender ropes hang from the main cables and support a pair of stiffening trusses or girders that run the length of the suspended spans. The stiffening trusses or girders support floor beams, stringers, and a roadway deck. Orthotropic decks may be used in place of the stringers and roadway deck. See the BIRM and the MBE for guidance on performing inspections of suspension bridges.
3. Cable-Stayed Bridges (Code ‘9’ in BridgeWorks) – Cable-stayed bridges are very distinct structures with many unique details that require special inspection. On a cable-stayed bridge the longitudinal structural components that support the road deck are supported by inclined cables or stays that extend directly into anchors or saddles in one or two towers. One cantilevered component is balanced by another cantilevered component on the opposite side of the support tower. Typically, the deck is anchored to the ground in at least one spot to resist seismic forces and any unbalance in the cantilevered spans. See the BIRM and the MBE for guidance on performing inspections on cable-stayed bridges.
4. Segmental Bridges (Code ‘5’ in BridgeWorks) – Segmental bridges are unique due to their construction. A segmental girder is a single or multiple box girder that is formed from segments post-tensioned together. This type of construction takes advantage of the standardization of the manufacturing process. See the BIRM and the MBE for guidance on performing inspections of concrete segmental bridges.
5. Floating Bridges (Code ‘2’ in BridgeWorks) – Floating bridges in Washington State consist of concrete pontoons that are bolted together longitudinally and are held in position by steel cables connected to anchors on the bottom of the waterway. Some of the bridges are reinforced with prestressing steel. Two of Washington State’s floating bridges contain movable spans that have unique operating characteristics.
6. Ferry Terminals (Code ‘6’ in BridgeWorks) – Ferry Terminals (Code ‘6’ in BridgeWorks) – Ferry terminals usually have a dock or holding area built over the water and a transfer span to carry traffic onto the ferry deck. The holding area can be constructed of treated timber, concrete, or steel components. The vehicle holding area or “dock” is typically considered a standard bridge structure and receives a Routine and Underwater Inspection. The transfer spans generally are steel trusses or girders with one end supported on the fixed pier and a free end which can be raised or lowered onto the boat to accommodate tidal changes. Transfer spans typically have their own structure I.D. and
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-19 January 2020
these structures are the ones with unique features which require the “Special Feature” inspection. Ferry Terminal transfer spans have enough unique features that specific BMS elements and inspection procedures have been developed to help the inspector navigate through a ferry terminal inspection. The Ferry Terminal Inspection Procedures Manual is published as a stand-alone document and can be found as publication M 3105 at www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/M3105.
7. Pin and Hanger Connections (Code ‘4’ in BridgeWorks) – A pin and hanger is a system used to connect suspended spans to cantilevered spans. The hanger is connected to a beam or girder by a pin on one or both ends. In two-girder and three-girder systems, the pin and hanger connection is fracture critical. Even when used in a multi-beam system where the bridge has a high degree of redundancy, the connection should still be inspected as closely as any fracture critical element. This is due to problems experienced in other states with pins in multi beam suspended spans. See the BIRM and the MBE for guidance on performing inspections of pin and hanger assemblies.
8. A-514 High Performance Steel (Code ‘7’ in BridgeWorks) – A-514 steel is used in high stress areas of larger steel bridges to reduce member size and total weight of steel. A typical location would be the top and bottom flanges of plate girders over the intermediate piers.
Bridges fabricated from A514 steel have suffered from hydrogen cracks which occurred during fabrication. Also, higher strength steels generally are subject to larger stress ranges than the lower strength steels. In tension zones, cracks may initiate and propagate faster than in the lower strength steels. It is important that Team Leaders check tension zones closely for cracks particularly at welds, bolt holes, copes, and other fatigue prone locations.
The Team Leader and Assistant Inspector are required to sign the approved and released copy of the Special Feature Report that is placed in the bridge file.
(E) Interim
Special inspections as defined in the MBE are called Interim inspections in the state of Washington. This inspection type is scheduled when a particular known or suspected deficiency needs to be monitored between Routine Inspections. Interim Inspections are not reported in the NBI or NTI.
1. Identifying Need – The Interim Inspection is performed to monitor a particular known or suspected deficiency and is carried out between regularly scheduled Routine Inspections. For example, if noticeable settling has occurred in the foundation, or if a particular bridge member shows signs of rapid deterioration. The Team Leader should observe and monitor this condition to determine the effect on the bridge or the danger posed to the bridge. Bridges or culverts should be considered for an Interim Inspection if the NBI Superstructure, Substructure or Culvert code is equal to or less than a 3.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-20 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
The inspection interval may vary depending on the type of deficiency being inspected. Interim Inspections may occur between regularly scheduled Routine Inspections on 24 month intervals, typically on the off year of the Routine Inspection. There are cases where Interim Inspections may occur several times during a calendar year on three or six month intervals. The inspecting agency along with the Team Leader will determine the appropriate inspection interval.
Consider performing an Interim Inspection for load posted bridges. The Interim Inspection should occur in the year that the Routine Inspection is not due.
2. Performing Inspection – The Team Leader is free to schedule an Interim Inspection as the need arises. This type of inspection can be accomplished by any Team Leader who has some familiarity with the bridge. If someone other than the Team Leader who performed the Routine Inspection is scheduled to perform the Interim Inspection, they should be carefully instructed as to what to look for, what measurements to take, what results might be expected, and/or how the problem can affect the structural integrity of the bridge.
3. Reporting – A BIR documenting the inspection findings should be prepared by the individual who performed the inspection. Any of the following information may be appropriate to include:
• The date of Interim Inspection.
• The Team Leader’s name.
• The applicable inspection interval.
• The location of the element or elements inspected.
• Any measurements taken.
• The procedures utilized to analyze and assess the given bridge element(s).
• The results of any testing performed.
• Any recommendations for maintenance or repair.
4. Updating the Inventory Record – Any changes that need to be made to the Inventory Record shall be entered into BridgeWorks. The Routine inspection date should not be changed due to an Interim Inspection. On all Interim Inspections, all changes/updates to NBI and NTI data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection
5. Updating the Bridge File – A copy of the report and an updated copy of the Inventory Record (if applicable) must be placed in the bridge file at the completion of the Interim Inspection and must be cross referenced to the current Bridge Inspection Report.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-21 January 2020
(F) Underwater Interim
This inspection type is scheduled when a particular known or suspected deficiency needs to be monitored between the regularly scheduled Underwater Inspections. Underwater Interim Inspections are not reported in the NBI.
1. Identifying Need – Common examples of findings requiring a change in the Underwater Inspection frequency are extensive scour or rapidly progressing deterioration. For example, spread footings normally buried and not visible for inspection which become exposed, or pile founded footings which become undermined need to be monitored closely. Foundation deterioration or damage may also warrant a visual inspection at a frequency less than the mandatory 60 months. Bridges should be considered for an Interim Underwater Inspection if the NBI Substructure code is equal to or less than 3.
The inspection interval will vary depending on the type of deficiency being monitored, and how rapidly the deterioration may be progressing. For scour related findings where a normally buried spread footing is found exposed, or in the case of a pile supported footing which becomes undermined, the Interim Inspection is placed on a 12 month frequency. During subsequent Interim Inspections, the frequency may be adjusted upwards if the scour is determined to be stable and non-threatening to the structure. Adjusting a scour related Interim Inspection frequency upwards is done slowly over time, i.e., 12 months, 24 months, 36 months ect., until the maximum 60 month inspection frequency is reached. For non-scour related Underwater Inspection findings (i.e., foundation damage or deterioration) the Underwater Interim Inspection frequency will usually be set at 24 months. There may be cases where Interim Inspections should occur several times during a calendar year on three or six month intervals. The inspecting agency along with the Team Leader will determine the appropriate inspection interval.
Consideration should be given to performing an Underwater Interim Inspection for load posted bridges, provided the load restriction is due to element’s that are only visible by Underwater Inspection techniques.
2. Performing Inspection – The underwater BIR will have specific language pertaining to the portions of the bridge needing the Interim Inspection, and what measurements need to be made. The Team Leader should carefully review the past inspection reports to become familiar with the bridge, and to assure that the correct portions of the bridge receive the Interim Inspection.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-22 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3. Reporting – A BIR documenting the inspection findings should be prepared by the individual who performed the inspection. Any of the following information may be appropriate to include:
• The date of Interim Inspection.
• The Team Leader’s name.
• The applicable inspection interval.
• The location of the element(s) inspected.
• Any measurements taken.
• The procedures utilized to analyze and assess the given bridge element(s).
• The results of any testing performed.
• Any recommendations for maintenance or repair.
4. Updating the Inventory Record – Any changes that need to be made to the Inventory Record shall be entered into BridgeWorks. The Underwater Inspection date should not be changed due to an underwater Interim Inspection. On all Interim Inspections, all changes/updates to NBI data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection.
5. Updating the Bridge File – A copy of the report and an updated copy of the Inventory Record (if applicable) must be placed in the bridge file at the completion of the Interim Inspection and must be cross referenced to the current bridge inspection report.
(G) Damage
A Damage Inspection is an unscheduled one-time inspection to assess structural damage resulting from an environmental or human event. The scope of inspection should be sufficient to determine the need for emergency load restrictions or closure of the bridge to traffic, and to assess the level of effort necessary to define a repair. Depending on the specific situation, a Damage Inspection may be cause to initiate Interim inspections. This determination is typically made by the Team Leader or their supervisor. Damage Inspections are not reported to the NBI or NTI.
Damage Inspections are categorized by type based on the damage received or how it was found or is being reported. Team Leaders should create a Damage Inspection Report in BridgeWorks and choose one of the following events:
• A – Over Height • B – Lateral Damage to Vertical
Member• E – Flood • G –Earthquake
• H – Bridge Rail • O – Other • S – Reported by Others - Overheight• T – Reported by Others – Lateral• U – Reported by Others - Bridge Rail
Damage Inspections do not have scheduled inspection frequencies but subsequent In-Depth and/or Interim Inspections may be scheduled as a result of the damage to monitor the structure over time.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-23 January 2020
If called upon to perform a Damage Inspection, Team Leaders should get familiarized with the type of bridge and the location of the damage. Office review of as-built plans and photos should take place prior to inspecting the damaged structure.
1. Assess Damage – When damage occurs as a result of collision, earthquake, or other forces, a thorough examination of the damaged areas should be made, along with an assessment of any residual damage to other bridge components. The amount of time and effort required to make this assessment will depend upon the extent and seriousness of the damage.
If significant damage has occurred, the Team Leader will need to:
• Identify any fractured members.
• Determine any loss of foundation support.
• Compute the amount of any section loss.
• Measure the amount any member is out of alignment.
• Inform the bridge owner that an updated load rating may be necessary.
Any time flooding has occurred on the waterway the bridge crosses, an inspection should be conducted both during and immediately after the flooding to assess what effects the increased water flow is having, or had, on the bridge. The following explains these procedures:
(a) During Event Inspection – An inspection during the flood can provide information about the structure’s safety and condition under adverse conditions. Observations made during the flood may help the Team Leader recommend appropriate measures to protect the bridge from failure or damage due to any future flooding.
To the extent possible during the flood, the Team Leader should look for the suggestion or the presence of any of the following:
• Streambed scour around underwater bridge elements.
• Bank erosion.
• Lateral migrations in the channel.
• Sediment transport or accumulation.
• Debris transport or accumulation (especially around piers).
(b) Follow-up Inspection – The bridge should be revisited immediately after the flood to assess any damage to the bridge and to provide information about the actual impact of the flood. The Team Leader should assess the impact of any of the following:
• Streambed scour around underwater bridge elements.
• Bank erosion.
• Lateral migrations in the channel.
• Sediment transport or accumulation.
• Debris transport or accumulation (especially around piers).
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-24 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
2. Critical Finding Damage Report (CFDR) – Critical Finding Damage Report (CFDR) – If the bridge has been damaged to the extent that has resulted in a critical finding, a CFDR, which is part of the Bridge Damage Report, shall be used, see Section 6-2 for further instructions. A copy of this report shall be entered into BridgeWorks.
3. Reporting – After a Damage Inspection Report has been created within BridgeWorks, descriptions and comments shall be added under the appropriate BMS elements describing the damage. A Bridge Damage Report is also required for all Damage Inspections performed by the state, See Section 6-2 for further instructions.
Add the damage photos and revise the BMS condition state codes if necessary. The following information should also be noted:
• The location, extent, and type of any damage found.
• The amount of any section loss.
• The degree to which any members are out of alignment.
• The need for new load ratings, if applicable.
• Any recommendations for repair or maintenance.
• Vertical clearance at the point of impact and at the minimum opening of the span on over height damage inspections.
For prestressed concrete or steel bridges fill out the Prestressed Concrete and Steel Damage Report form or equivalent to supplement the Bridge Damage Report, see Section 3-5.
If the bridge is damaged as a result of the flood or if conditions have changed at the bridge site, a Bridge Damage Report and a new Scour Field Evaluation form must be completed. If the bridge is a scour critical structure, the instructions within the Plan of Action (POA) should be followed, see Section 5-3.2.
The report should provide the following information:
• Flood stage at which the bridge was visited. This information can be found at the NOAA National Weather Service website.
• Approximate streamflow volume and velocity at the time of the visit. This information can be found at the NOAA National Weather Service website.
• Location and extent of any damage to the bridge.
• Current condition of any bridge elements affected by the flood.
• Any recommendations for scour countermeasures, bank protection, channel protection, etc., which may protect the bridge from damage during future flooding or reduce the potential for future flooding.
When printing Bridge Damage Reports, only include the BMS elements, photos, repairs and files that pertain to the damage.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-25 January 2020
4. Updating the Inventory Record – If any changes to the Inventory Record (the inventory or load ratings, for example) are needed, they must be entered into BridgeWorks. On all Damage Inspections, all changes/updates to NBI and NTI data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection.
5. Updating the Bridge File – A copy of the BIR and an updated copy of the Inventory Record (if applicable), a copy of the Bridge Damage Report and all other applicable forms and drawings shall be placed in the bridge file at the completion of the Damage Inspection.
(H) Primary Safety
A Primary Safety Inspection (H) is used by an agency that chooses to inspect a structure owned by another agency. Some examples include:
• a railroad bridge over a state or local agency route
• a local agency owned pedestrian bridge over a state route
• a state owned bridge carrying traffic over a local agency route
• a state owned bridge inspected by a local agency
Agencies that own the structure and maintain a record in WSBIS cannot use the primary safety report types.
This inspection is performed at the discretion of the agency which has an interest in the structure, and the inspection scope and frequency is also entirely determined by that agency. These inspections are not reported to the NBI or NTI, and are not subject to the NBIS or NTIS. Generally speaking these inspections are intended to assess the safety of the structure for any immediate hazard to the route crossing under it, and the inspection is directed to only those portions of the structure that could affect that undercrossing route.
The agency performing a primary safety inspection should limit inspection notes to BMS element 378 – Undercrossing Primary Safety. Repair recommendations should be limited to only those findings that directly affect the safety for users of the route under the bridge. In cases where the bridge owner also maintains an inspection record in WSBIS, the repair can be added to the repair report. In cases where the bridge owner doesn’t use WSBIS (most railroads for example), entering repairs into the repair report will need to be supplemented with direct contact with the structure owner.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-26 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
(I) Secondary Safety
A Secondary Safety Inspection is used by an agency that chooses to inspect a structure owned by another agency in cases where 3 agencies have an interest in the structure – the owning agency and two agencies with routes under the structure. The only current example is a sound transit structure with a record maintained in WSBIS that crosses over both state and local agency routes. In this case, the state would maintain the primary safety report type and the local agency would maintain the secondary safety report type.
Agencies that own the structure and maintain a record in WSBIS cannot use the secondary safety report types. All notes for the secondary safety inspection should be located in BMS Element 379 – Undercrossing Secondary Safety.
In all other respects, the primary safety and secondary safety report types are similar, see the primary safety report type for additional information.
(J) Condition Safety
A Condition Safety inspection is used in cases where an agency owns a structure that is not reportable to the NBI or NTI but is using WSBIS to maintain a comprehensive record of the structure for both public safety and long term maintenance. Examples include:
• A state or local agency pedestrian bridge, regardless of whether or not it crosses over a state or local agency route.
• A bridge that is undergoing phased construction and may require an inspection before final configuration.
• A transit structure where the owner chooses to maintain a record in WSBIS, again regardless of whether or not it crosses over a state or local agency route.
Short Span Inspections and Report types are separate from Condition Inspection and Report Types. See (K) Short Span.
This inspection is performed at the discretion of the agency which owns the structure, and the inspection scope and frequency is also entirely determined by that agency. These inspections are not reported to the NBI or NTI, and are not subject to the NBIS or NTIS. Generally speaking these inspections are intended to ensure both public safety and long term maintenance of the entire structure. In this regard they are similar to routine inspections, but without specific federally mandated requirements for inspection frequency, level of detail, or appraisal coding.
(K) Short Span
Short Span (I) – This inspection type is used for bridges/culverts that have an opening of 20 feet or less. This is measured along the center of the roadway between undercopings of abutments, spring lines of arches, or extreme ends of openings for multiple boxes. Short Span bridges may also include multiple pipe culverts, but the clear distance between openings must be less than half of the smaller contiguous opening. Short Spans are not reported to the NBI.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-27 January 2020
Even though short span bridges are not reported to the NBI, there remains concern about their deterioration and performance. Therefore, it is recommended that agencies inspect short span bridges similar to a full NBI inspection for informational purposes. The frequency of the inspections for these bridges will be at the discretion of the owner agency. An Assistant Inspector who has 3 years of bridge condition inspection or the approval of their supervisor and has successfully completed a FHWA approved comprehensive bridge inspection training course can perform as a Team Leader for Short Span Inspections.
1. Inspection Criteria – Inspections are recommended for the following short span bridges:
• Timber structures that meet the criteria in Appendix 3-A1 and Appendix 3-A2.
• Single span concrete or metal structures, other than metal corrugated pipes that meet the criteria in Appendix 3-A1 and Appendix 3-A2.
• Multiple span structures that meet the criteria in Appendix 3-A3.
• Metal corrugated pipes with an opening greater than 8 feet.
• Multiple pipes with a structure length from 10 feet to 20 feet, see (1340) in Appendix 2-C for structure length definitions.
This criteria is presented as a guideline and is not intended to replace sound engineering judgment. When in doubt, a conservative approach should be taken.
a. Short Span Bridges Inspected – If the short span bridge is inspected, agencies should follow these guidelines on reporting:
(1) Fill in all the applicable fields listed on the WSBIS coding form. The bridge number should be unique for short span bridges.
(2) Take deck and elevation photographs.
(3) Fill out the Scour Field Evaluation form (if applicable).
(4) Complete a BIR.
(5) Determine the frequency of inspection needed. Recommended frequencies are as follows:
• 12 Months – Timber with red/yellow tags, any other material in poor condition needing monitoring, scour issues, load posting, etc.
• 24 Months – All other timber structures, any other material that has BMS elements in Condition States 3 or 4.
• 48 Months – Metal structures in good condition and concrete structures with minor problems.
• 72 Months – Concrete structures in good condition.
(6) Submit the data through normal bridge inspection reporting procedures.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-28 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
b. Short Span Bridges Not Inspected – If the short span bridge is not inspected, the following are some guidelines to follow:
(1) WSDOT Team Leaders should note the milepost, type of bridge, features carried, features intersected, take elevation and deck photographs, and notify maintenance personnel that future inspections of the bridge are their responsibility.
(2) Local Agency Team Leaders should note the milepost, type of bridge, features carried, features intersected, take elevation and deck photographs, and determine if the need for any future inspection of the bridge is necessary and coordinate with their maintenance personnel.
2. Performing the Inspections – The inspection procedures for short span bridges are the same as those for NBI bridges.
An Underwater Inspection is performed on short span bridges with structural elements underwater. If the Team Leader is unable to assess the condition of the elements either visually or by probing, an underwater bridge inspection diver must conduct the Underwater Inspection. This inspection determines the structural condition and adequacy of the short span bridges underwater elements.
3. Updating the Inventory Record – Following the inspection procedures used on NBI bridges insures consistency of reporting. State-owned bridges are added to the WSDOT Bridge List while local agency bridges are added to their own local inventories.
After the bridges are inspected, the procedures for creating and updating the Inventory Record are followed. On all short span inspections, all changes/updates to the data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection.
4. Updating the Bridge File – The minimum information maintained in the bridge file for short span bridges should include:
a. Inventory data, including location maps.
b. Completed inspection forms.
c. A sketch of the bridge showing dimensions and depth of fill (barrel length should be taken as one pass distance, regardless of the number of barrels).
d. Deck and elevation photographs
e. Scour Field Evaluation Form (if applicable).
f. Correspondence.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-29 January 2020
(L) Two-Man UBIT
This inspection type is used when the UBIT, its driver and the UBIT operator are supplied to an outside agency by the BPO, but the responsibility for the inspection and reporting resides with the Team Leader. The sole purpose of this inspection type is to facilitate the scheduling of future inspections and the internal accounting and billing of current inspection work. The frequency for Two-Man UBIT inspections is set by the Local Agencies. This inspection type is not reported to the NBI.
1. Identify Need – Through signed agreements between the State and Local Agencies, the State can assist those agencies with inspections requiring the use of specialized equipment by performing two-man UBIT inspections.
The inspection interval may vary depending on terms of the agreement between the State and the Local Agency. The Local Agency shall determine the level and inspection interval for their structures within the agreement.
2. Performing the Inspection – Typically, an Assistant Inspector and UBIT driver will make up the inspection team that represents the State. A Local Agency Team Leader will accompany the state team to perform the inspection. The Assistant Inspector will coordinate with the Local Agency Team Leader as to how the work will proceed for the time period assigned.
3. Updating the Inventory Record – The responsibility of generating the BIR and editing the WSBIS and any applicable inspection forms and entering the data into BridgeWorks shall reside with the Team Leader from the Local Agency.
4. Assistant Inspector/Local Agency Team Leader Responsibilities – The Assistant Inspector from the State or the Local Agency Team Leader under advisement of the State Assistant Inspector shall ensure that the following items are completed during and after the inspection of each local agency bridge.
a. While at the bridge site, take a Deck and Elevation photo of the structure.
b. Log the actual UBIT hours on site.
c. Create a Two-Man inspection type within BridgeWorks.
d. Enter the Local Agency Team Leader’s initials as ZZZ and a certification number of Z9999.
e. The bucket operator’s initials will be entered as the Assistant Inspector. The Assistant Inspector should attach the deck and elevation photos taken at the site into BridgeWorks.
f. Add the appropriate resources and dates for future inspections.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-30 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
(M) Informational
This report type is used as a means to add notes, data, files or photos to a report between scheduled inspections. Additionally the Informational Report can be used to change the inspection frequency if necessary or to just assign a next scheduled inspection date without having to change the normal inspection frequency. An Informational Report type does not involve field work and is typically used by inspection staff and the Bridge Information Group. Data that is updated through an Informational Report can be accessed from the SI&A report on BEISt. Depending on the type of data updated through an Informational Report, it may be necessary to print out and sign a new report for scanning into BEISt. This will be determined by the Team Leader and their supervisor. An example of an Informational Report that may require a signature is one that changes the NBI or Bridge Management System (BMS) or SNTI codes. In these cases, a statement in the applicable area of the notes section of the report should state why the changes made were made. Informational Reports are not reported in the NBI or NTI. An Assistant Inspector who has 3 years of bridge condition inspection experience or the approval of their supervisor and has successfully completed a FHWA approved comprehensive bridge inspection training course can create an Information Report.
(N) Inventory
This report type is used to notify the inspection team that a structure is either new or altered and needs field verification to track construction progress and update the record when the work is completed. This report type will also provide detailed information on the new or altered structure to assist the inspection team in field verification. This report type is intended to stay in the bridge record until the construction work is completed, then removed thereafter.
For WSDOT structures, the Inventory report type is always created and removed by the BPO Information Group, and is closely coordinated with the ContractHistory database. BPO inspection teams shall always review the information in an inventory report type and update the record as needed, including clearly indicating when the construction work is completed.
Examples of construction work that tracked by this report type include:
• New structures
• Retrofits and rehabilitation (deck replacement, seismic retrofits, strengthening, etc)
• Any new or replaced BMS elements (new joints, rails, overlays, etc)
• Utility work
• Roadway alterations UNDER bridges that affect vertical and horizontal clearances (new pavement, roadway widening, etc)
• Functional changes (bridge changed from 2 way to 1 way traffic due to construction of new parallel bridge, for example)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-31 January 2020
Examples of construction work NOT tracked by this report type include:
• Repair work tracked in the Repair List
• Any changes to the structure record which are not performed in the field by inspectors (updated ADT, NHS designation, etc)
An Assistant Inspector who has 3 years of bridge condition inspection experience or the approval of their supervisor and has successfully completed a FHWA approved comprehensive bridge inspection training course can create an Inventory Report. This report type is not reported to the NBI or NTI.
(O) In-Depth
Any time a bridge element or portion of the bridge requires further evaluation, analysis, or investigation to accurately assess its condition, complete an In-Depth Inspection. This inspection may involve testing, monitoring, or conducting specific analyses of given bridge elements. In-Depth Inspections are performed as needed and do not have a set inspection frequency. They are not reported in the NBI or NTI.
1. Identify Need – Any time the structural condition of an element cannot be determined in the course of a Routine Inspection, an In-Depth Inspection may be required. The In-Depth Inspection is performed to obtain more sophisticated data, perform special testing, and/or bring in other experts to assess a particular problem.
The need for an In-Depth Inspection generally arises as a result of a Routine Inspection; however, such a need may also be the result of a damage, flood, or Interim Inspection. Whenever such a need is discovered, an In-Depth Inspection should be performed.
In-Depth Inspections do not have inspection intervals and are treated as one-time only inspections. If the inspecting agency feels that subsequent inspections are needed on regular intervals, Interim Inspections should be utilized instead.
2. Performing the Inspection – The In-Depth Inspection should include as detailed analysis as necessary to determine the condition of the given bridge element. There can be no standard set of procedures to follow or observations to be made. Many factors will influence the depth and extent of analysis required. To facilitate accomplishment of the inspection, the Team Leader should make sure that any traffic control measures or necessary special equipment will be available.
3. Reporting – There is no standard form to be completed for reporting In-Depth Inspection findings. When the inspection is concluded, the Team Leader should prepare a BIR along with any additional documentation to note:
• The location of each bridge element inspected.
• The procedures used to analyze and assess the particular bridge element.
• The names, titles, and observations made by any specialists who were consulted.
• The results of any testing performed.
• Any recommendations for maintenance or repair.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-32 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
4. Updating the Inventory Record – Any changes that need to be made in the Inventory Record shall be entered into BridgeWorks.
On all In-Depth Inspections, all changes/updates to NBI or NTI data shall be released into the inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection.
5. Updating the Bridge File – A copy of the report and an updated copy of the Inventory Record.
Record (if applicable) shall be placed in the bridge file at the completion of the In-Depth Inspection and must be cross referenced to the current Bridge Inspection Report.
(P) Geometric
This inspection type is used to collect vertical and horizontal roadway clearances for routes both on and under bridges and would also include a complete review and update of all the vertical clearance cards associated with the bridge. Vertical and horizontal roadway clearances are collected at an 8 year frequency for minimum vertical clearances of 16.5 feet and less, and at a 16 year frequency for minimum vertical clearances greater than 16.5 feet. An Assistant Inspector can perform as a Team Leader for Geometric Inspections. Geometric data that has been collected using LIDAR can be used to update bridge inventory data as a Geometric Inspection as long as the Team Leader has reviewed the LIDAR data. This inspection type is not reported to the NBI or NTI.
(Q) Feature (Local Agency use only)
This inspection type is used for certified and non-certified inspectors to document time spent in bridge inspection activities. It is also used for scheduling non-reoccurring inspections. When a new UCD is created in BridgeWorks over top of a Feature Inspection, the Feature Inspection report tab will not be perpetuated.
Examples:
• A Co-inspector working on road crew documents bridge rail damage ob-served while in the area of the bridge.
• One time only chain drag of deck
• Evaluation of bridge for overload permit.
3-3 Bridge Inspection OrientationDesignation of the bridge orientation and a component numbering system for the bridge elements are needed for consistency within the inspection reports. Typical bridge orientation convention has the structure beginning at and going from the west end of the structure to the east, or from the south to the north, or in some cases, the direction of increasing mile post. The subcomponents of a structure are typically numbered from the left to the right looking ahead on stationing. The orientation and component numbering system typically follows the convention of the inspecting agency. If the State inspects bridges for other agencies, they will follow State convention (see Exhibit 3-7 through Exhibit 3-10) or follow established agency orientation.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-33 January 2020
Exhibit 3-7 Bridge Nomenclature
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-34 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-8 Component Location
Orientation: B.O.B. normally south or west ends following route orientation.Exceptions Include: One way ramps – B.O.B. = First end to receive traffic.Selected bridges that follow plan orientation.There is no golden rule about orientation except that B.O.B. Must always be identified in the ‘0’ note along with basis for this assumption. It is helpful to refer to geographical markers (streets, rivers, etc) when describing the B.O.B.
Exhibit 3-9 In-Span Hinge Callout
IN-SPAN HINGE CALLOUT
End Diaphragm Bearing of various types(Roller Bearing shown)
Upper Crossbeam
Lower Crossbeam End Diaphragm
(Do not Quantify Crossbeams in BMS for Box Girder)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-35 January 2020
Exhibit 3-10 Component Identification
Section 3-4 provides guidelines for inspection processes and procedures specific to the State and the Office of Local Programs. These guidelines can be used as a reference or can be implemented.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-36 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3-4 Policy and ProceduresThis section discusses the specific policies and procedures that are utilized in BPO or LP that are supplementary guidelines for field work and inspection report writing. These best management practices are utilized by inspection teams and are specific to each program.
3-4.1 BPO Policy and Procedures
3-4.1.A General Inspection and Report Writing• Columns on the first page of the BIR contain NBI and agency specific items with
associated coding information for each structure within the inventory. The numbers within parenthesis next to these item titles are WSBIS item numbers and are unique to the BridgeWorks program that corresponds to FHWA items and/or agency specific items. For example, the first code at the top of the BIR form is the Structural Adequacy Appraisal code and is denoted by WSBIS item number (1657).
• When circumstances (including obstruction of bridge elements) prevent any required work from being completed at the time of inspection, report this fact to your supervisor so a determination can be made whether or not the bridge needs to be rescheduled in the current inspection year. It is the responsibility of the Team Leader to ensure that the bridge inspection is completed unless the supervisor delegates the responsibility. Bridges that cannot be inspected due to high water will be rescheduled in the current inspection year during lower flows. Bridges that need cleaning or vegetation removed will require coordination with maintence for dirt and/or vegetation removal prior to re-inspection. If the supervisor determines that the bridge does not need to be rescheduled in the current inspection year, clearly identify why the work wasn’t completed and what is required of the next team leader to achieve the task.
• Traffic lanes on a structure are numbered from right to left looking in the direction of traffic on one-way multilane routes. For reversible lanes assumed orientation should be described in the report.
• Whenever an in-span hinge separates two bridges, the bearings, restrainers, and joint are to be coded with the “dependent” structure. Explain any exceptions to this rule in the 0 note.
• Whenever measurements are taken, for joint openings, monitored conditions, or anything else, include in the report the date and the air temperature when the measurements were taken. Unless there is a warranted condition, only measurements from the last three inspections need to be maintained.
• Refer to specific joints by pier or span numbers instead of joint numbers. There may be unique circumstances where using joint numbers are justified. Under these circumstances, justification for using joint numbers must be documented in the report.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-37 January 2020
• Investigate fully and report any and all joint noises and their origination.
• Compare Curb to Curb Deck Width (1356) with Horizontal Clearance (1491 and 1495) and investigate differences (typically they should be the same, except for non-mountable medians).
• Detailed notes are to be entered separately under each Bridge Management System (BMS) element. NBI notes should reference the appropriate BMS element note. Maintain any details of flagged defects or damage within the BMS element note.
• Inspection report summary comments are required for any BMS element in Condition State (CS) 2, 3 or 4.
• Avoid using phrases for significant defects such as “open crack” without a further description such as width, and any repetitive nature. Mark the specific defect location on the bridge with any measurement and the date. Consider taking a photo of the marked defect to include in the inspection report. For concrete crack size guidelines, see the table in Section 4-4.
• When submitting reports for initial review, include field notes in the review package along with a clean copy of the report, the WSBIS sheet, the inspection photographs, and other relevant reports (fracture critical, soundings, etc.). The WSBIS sheet is required to reflect all current changes associated with the inspection.
• Describe photos with respect to bridge orientation, not geographic direction. Photos should identify the orientation, location, and what is photographed. All photos, except deck and elevation photos, must be numbered and referenced in the notes or in an attached file such as a Fracture Critical Report.
• Photos no longer relevant to the report should be deleted. Keep repair photos in the report for an additional inspection cycle so the Bridge Preservation Supervisor can compare them.
• Deck and Elevation Photos should be assessed at each inspection. Update photos if there are new conditions or changes to the structure.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-38 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3-4.1.B Bridge Inspection Notes Standard Practice
A. Cardinal directions (north, south, east, and west) are never capitalized, except at the beginning of a sentence. These directions are also not abbreviated. The directions northeast, southeast, northwest, and southwest may be abbreviated NE, SE, NW, and SW.
B. For acronyms, follow the standard practice of spelling out the first time use with the acronym in parenthesis following (e.g., Local Programs (LP)).
C. Use of abbreviations should be limited. Common abbreviations:
F Fahrenheit A.M. a.m.in. or ″ inch (inches) P.M. p.m.ft. or ‘ foot (feet)
‘ symbol only used when followed by a dimension in inches.
NW NE SW SE directions
L length D depthW width etc. etcetera
sq. ft. square feet or SF LF linear feetpsi pounds per sq. in. YT Yellow taggedpsf pounds per sq. ft. RT Red tagged
ACP asphalt concrete pavement LMC latex modified concreteBST bituminous surface treatment HMA hot mix asphaltSR State Route US National HighwayI Interstate Jan January, etc.
D. Limit the use of symbols to ° for degrees and % for percent.
E. Dimensions are noted with a space or hyphen between feet and inches, and a hyphen between whole inches and fractions of an inch. When combined with other dimensions, a ‘0’ should precede bare fractions of an inch. Measurements greater than 12″ may be listed in inches, if appropriate. Decimal inches may also be used. For example:
1′ 1-1/16″ × 6′ 0-7/8″ 6″ × 14″ timber stringers 8″ × 14″ × 1/2″ deep spall 3 ft. wide × 14 ft. long × 2.5 ft. tall bridge corbel 12 ft. (L) × 15′ 6″ (W) × 3″ (D) popout in south face of Pier 2 1′ 0-3/4″(l) × 0.125″(w) crack in east face of Girder 2F 42.2″ long anchor bolts
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-39 January 2020
3-4.1.C Report Notes Within BridgeWorks
0 Note – Orientation
• Bridge orientation and identification of the pier/span numbering system is always required, stating the basis of orientation such as “increasing mileposts,” “ramp direction,” or per plans. Any potentially confusing orientation issues or deviations from standards (west to east or south to north) must be clearly identified. Identifiable physical features at beginning or end of bridge may also be used. See Section 3-3 for bridge orientation examples.
• Place any special instructions and information that doesn’t fit anywhere else under the 0 note.
• Use the following note for bridges eligible for a 48 month frequency:
Continue to validate the status of this bridge each inspection as a 48-month inspection candidate. Verify condition ratings, load ratings, vertical clearances, ADT, scour codes and that no major maintenance has been completed in the last two years.
1 Note – This note is maintained by the Team Leader and is used for explanatory information regarding bridges that are Fracture Critical and/or require a Special Feature Inspection. Use this note to explain any special features, procedures, areas to be inspected or complicated scheduling. Do not use this note to redundantly repeat resource information or dates that an inspection occurred.
5 Note – Program Management Engineer maintains this note. It contains information regarding scheduled rehabilitation or replacement, and other upcoming program management items.
9 Note – The 9 note is used to create the executive summary for an Underwater Inspection Report.
11 Note – The Load Rating Engineer maintains this field. It is used to explain any load posting placed on a bridge. This note is closely associated with the Revise Rating flag (2688), see Section 3-4.1.E.
3-4.1.D Operating Level Code (1660)
Verify that load posting signs are in place at the bridge and in advance of the bridge. Advance load postings must be placed in advance of the nearest intersecting road, ramp or wide point in the road where a driver can detour or turn around. Verify that load posting signs and advance load posting signs match the posting requirements in Note 11 and write a note within BridgeWorks under Operating Level Code (1660) to that effect. Take a photo of any existing posting signs and advance posting signs. Ensure that (1293) (open or closed) is coded appropriately.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-40 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3-4.1.E Revise Rating Flag (2688)
For State owned bridges, any load rating issues should be addressed within the body of the BIR in the (2688) note. Delete any notes that don’t have relevance to the existing condition of the bridge.
3-4.1.F Scour Code (1680)
The Scour Engineer maintains the Scour code (1680) field and notes. Any scour comments by the Team Leader should be placed in BMS Element (#361) Scour Flag or Channel Protection (1677), depending upon which is most appropriate.
3-4.1.G Soundings Resource
When preparing for an inspection that requires soundings, print any existing stream profile file to include in your inspection field packet. The Scour Engineer determines which State bridges need stream cross sections (soundings) by placing a “Y” in the Soundings Flag (2693). When this is required as part of the inspection, perform the following:
1. Enter data into the Scour Field Evaluation Form, see Section 3-5.
a. If you could not take soundings on the initial inspection trip, plan on getting them on another trip, either by coordinating with another Team Leader or by doing it yourself.
b. If there is a reason soundings should be taken at a different time of the year (e.g. low water, low tide, or fish windows), add a resource with an explanation under the Report Types Tab.
2. Save the file under the bridge number (e.g., 5_24S.xls) in the appropriate year “Soundings” folder found on the W drive at W:\Data\Bridge\RegionalInsp\Common\Soundings.
3. Attach the completed form to the appropriate bridge inspection report File Tab, replacing any already existing form and remove the old one.
4. Change the Soundings Flag (2693) from “Y” to “*” for State bridges only.
5. When you return to the office submit an email to the Scour Engineer stating that the soundings have been completed and that the findings are in the soundings folder for his review.
6. The Scour Engineer will email an electronic stream profile file that you will attach to the report Files tab.
a. Replace any existing stream profile file with the updated one and remove the old one.
b. Print the new stream profile file and include it with your inspection review packet.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-41 January 2020
3-4.1.H Timber Structures• Yellow Tagged (YT) members have rot and a shell greater than or equal to 1-½”. A YT
member requires a Priority 2 repair. The need for Interim Inspections is determined by the lead.
• Red Tagged (RT) members have rot and a shell less than 1-½”. A RT member requires a Priority 1 repair. Schedule an Interim Inspection. Determine the extent, location and significance of decay. Provide details for the Load Rating Engineer.
3-4.1.I Culverts• Structure Length, NBI Length and Maximum Span are determined in accordance with
(1340), (2346), and (1348).
• The BMS quantity is determined by measuring from inlet to outlet of one barrel/pipe and is not dependent upon the number of barrels or pipes.
3-4.1.J Vertical Clearances (1370, 1374 and 2694)
Every Routine, Short Span, Safety or Condition inspection shall include verification of the vertical clearance (VC) card comparing it with the current condition and any significant changes (new asphalt, additional lanes, new curb/gutter, etc). Verification will also include at least one vertical clearance measurement if traffic allows, and ideally at the low point if possible. If changes in conditions or conflicts with the VC card are identified, note discrepancies and collect all new clearances if possible. If no changes or discrepancies are identified, no further action is required.
For structures in excess of 16’-6”, with no other noted changes or discrepancies, the verification of a vertical clearance measurement is optional.
Each Inspection
• Check for all postings on bridge, and in advance, are in place.
• Check that Posted clearances are consistent with existing conditions and documentation.
• Update 2694 as applicable
• Update the WSBIS as applicable.
When to Collect or Verify Vertical Clearances
• Whenever a clearance card is missing, incomplete or inaccurate. High traffic volumes may prevent the ability to acquire this information without traffic control.
• When changes in alignments, geometry or conditions affecting current measurements are identified.
• At bridges where the clearances box has been populated with a “V”.
• When Team Leader feels that over height hit damage is occurring significantly enough to check the existing clearance information.
• As a part of over height load damage inspections.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-42 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Where to Collect or Verify Vertical Clearances
• Minimum clearances along all lane stripes, edges of pavement/curb or controlling grade breaks between these points.
• Appurtenances (lights, signs, utilities) that control minimum vertical clearances should be documented as well, but in most circumstances will be used only to create a repair recommendation to relocate appurtenance. Provide vertical clearance information to the Sign Bridge Engineer.
• For existing postings verify lowest accessible clearance location first and verify other locations as required.
• For Damage Inspections, measure all accessible lane stripe locations in the area of the damage and at the point of impact.
Documenting Vertical Clearances
• Document all measured clearances. Drawings should be neatly transcribed and turned in to the Bridge Geometry Engineer. Photos are to be placed in the Photos/2694 Clearance folder in BridgeWorks and the Bridge Geometry Engineer notified of this action.
• 2694 Note should reference: Vertical clearances taken or checked on (date). Minimum clearance below the bridge measured to be (measured minimum clearance) below (exact location). See photo #. REPAIR #00000. In situations where multiple structures are controlled by one structure that requires posting, the recommended posting locations and the presence or omission of signage shall be appropriately documented in the 2694 notes of each of the involved structures.
• Update WSBIS fields (1370), (1374) and (1499). Appurtenances are not coded. Consult with the Bridge Geometry Engineer for questions.
Posting Requirements and Recommendations
• Bridges with field measured minimum clearances over the traveled lanes equal to 14’ 3” up to and including 15’ 3” require posting on the structure at the controlling location and advance warning signs at one or both shoulders.
• All bridges with field measured minimum clearances less than 14’ 3” require additional advance posting signs in advance of nearest intersecting roads, ramps or a wide point in the road where a driver can detour or turn around.
• All posted clearances shall be 3” less than the actual lowest measured clearance, except as follows:
1. In some cases, WSDOT intentionally posts clearances with more than a 3” buffer. This decision will be documented in the 2694 note, identifying the posting clearance required.
2. The City of Spokane has a 1” buffer rule, so bridges are intentionally posted only 1” less than measured. This will be documented in the 2694 note for all affected bridges inspected by BPO staff.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-43 January 2020
3. A tolerance to the 3” buffer for existing bridge posting signs is allowed. See criteria listed below.
• If the actual measured opening for a bridge or tunnel increases by 2” or less the existing signing may remain. (e.g. a bridge clearance changes from 15’-0” to 15’-2”, the existing warning sign of 14’-9” may remain.)
• If the actual measure opening for a bridge or tunnel increases by more than 2” the signs shall be replaced. (e.g. a bridge clearance changes from 14’-9” to 15’-0”, the existing warning sign of 14’-6” shall be corrected.)
• If the actual measured opening for a bridge or tunnel decreases by 1” or less the existing signs may remain. (e.g. a bridge clearance changes from 15’-0” to 14’-11”, the existing warning sign of 14’-9” may remain.)
• If the actual measured opening for a bridge or tunnel decreases by more than 1” the existing signs shall be replaced. (e.g. a bridge clearance changes from 14’-10” to 14’-8”, the existing warning sign of 14’-7” shall be corrected.)
There are situations where bridges should be posted for minimum vertical clearances in the shoulders (outside traveled way). Check with the Bridge Geometry Engineer for details. Appurtenances such as lights or signs that suspend below those bridge elements are to be noted. Those that are 15’3” or less within a traveled path or have evidence of traffic impact damage are to be written up as a repair to be removed or relocated.
Vertical Clearance (V) Repair
• A Priority 1 or 2 Vertical Clearance (V) Repair is warranted as follows:
• Priority 1: When vertical clearance posting is found deficient (for example less than 2” buffer), missing, or where the signage on and in advance of the bridge do not match.
• Priority 2: When a vertical clearance posting on and in advance of the bridge is found conservative (more than 5” buffer) without prior documentation from the Region or other authorized authority.
• Each repair written should identify and include the following language:
• (Minimum clearance measured to be (measured clearance) located at (controlling location) on (date measured). Post for (3” less than measured clearance) in accordance with the most current WSDOT Low Vertical Clearance Signing Policy. Contact Bridge Geometry Engineer at Bridge Preservation 360-570-2544 with any questions.
3-4.1.K Horizontal Clearances• Collect minimum shoulder widths on both sides of roadway and edge of traveled way
(fog line) to permanent obstruction (columns, abutments, retaining walls, toe of slopes). See Item 1379 for ramps, gores and other more complex configuration examples.
• Collect horizontal clearances where the clearance flag has been populated with an “H”.
• Update WSBIS fields (1379) and (1383) (Minimum Lateral under Clearance Right & Left).
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-44 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3-4.1.L Inspection of Structures Under Contract• Information organized by the Bridge Inventory Technician will include the Project Office
contact and contract numbers.
• For structures under contract, the BPO inspector MUST make contact with the Project Office (Project Engineer if possible) prior to performing inspection. Do not directly talk to contractor.
• If construction defects or safety issues are found during inspection:
Emergency contacts: 1st – Region Project Engineer 2nd – BPO 3rd – HQ Bridge Construction Office
• Routine Maintenance, contact the Project Office and Regional Maintenance Staff.
3-4.1.M Bridge Scour for Local Agency Bridge Inspections• Bridges with Scour Code (1680) of 2 and 3 are scour critical. For reports with a scour code
of “6”,”U”or “T” the bridge is assumed to be scour critical.
• Bridges with a scour code of “6”, “U”, or “T” need a priority 1 repair called out in the (1680) note.
The call out in the (1680) note should read as follows: “This inspection report assumes the bridge is scour critical. REPAIR #XXXXX”
The Repair should read as follows: “(1680) is coded [“U”, “T”, or “6”] indicating that the bridge foundation is not known, is tidal, and/or has not been evaluated. Perform evaluation of scour potential and any required mitigation. Indicate determination and any requirements under the (1680) note.”
• Scour critical bridges, and those that are assumed to be scour critical, that have exposed footings or have a history of exposed footings due to scour, REQUIRE a priority 1 scour repair documented in the BMS Element (#361) – Scour flag note in BridgeWorks. This repair should read as follows: “Scour mitigation needs to be evaluated.”
• All scour critical bridges need soundings at every Routine Inspection. The (2693) note needs the following comment: “Take soundings every Routine Inspection on this scour critical bridge.” Also ensure that the (2693) flag is set to “Y” at all times. This will help the process stay in place over time.
• Bridges that are not scour critical do not need cross sections unless there is some specific need that is documented in the report.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-45 January 2020
3-4.1.N Rental Equipment
The Enterprise and Risk Management Office has declared that equipment damage insurance must be purchased when renting access equipment. If the rental company does not offer insurance, insurance can be purchased through the Department of Enterprise Services (DES). The DES insurance option can take up to two weeks to process so plan accordingly.
For rented access equipment the following is required:
• Review the paperwork, when receiving the equipment, to insure that it reflects insurance for the rented equipment.
• Review the invoice when you receive it from the BPO Accountant, making sure that the rate and time used are correct.
• Notify the rental office of any discrepancies found.
• Write the bridge number and dates used on the invoice.
• Return it to the BPO Accountant for processing.
3-4.1.O Bridge Inspection Safety
A Pre-Activity Safety Plan (PASP) is required prior to any field activity. A copy of the PASP form is located at W:\Data\Bridge\RegionalInsp\FORMS\SAFETY
3-4.1.P Identifying The Purpose Of Inspections in the Bridge Inspection Report
Indicate the purpose and schedule of any Interim or Special Inspections that are required, similar to the following format: “Interim Inspections of RT timber are done in odd numbered years and Routine Inspections of the entire bridge are done in even numbered years.” Statement should briefly describe what is to be accomplished during the Interim or Special Feature Inspection. This information is placed in the “Notes” box under the specific inspection tab, but may sometimes be more completely explained here. It can additionally be placed in the 0 note.
3-4.1.Q Agreements Inspections
Team Leader will provide the complete submittal package for each bridge inspected, which includes the signed inspection report, the SI&A sheet, the inventory sheet, all photos and files is given to the Bridge Resource Technician (BRT) who checks them against the scope of work. If there is anything missing, the BRT needs to check with the inspectors and follow up with the Bridge Preservation Accountant (BPA) if there are problems with providing a complete submittal package. The complete submittal package for each bridge is scanned and loaded onto BEIST, and a hardcopy filed in the unofficial letter file in the resource room. The complete submittal packages for each bridge are sent to the agency via USPS to the address in the agreement along with a transmittal letter listing all inspection reports provided. A copy of the transmittal letter is given to the BPA for filing with the invoices and agreements.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-46 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
3-4.2 LP Policy and Procedures
Local Agency Policy and Procedures are detailed in the Local Agency Guidelines (LAG). Electronic copies of the LAG are available on the WSDOT Local Programs website at www.wsdot.wa.gov/localprograms.
Local agencies are encouraged to review the BPO Policies and Procedures in the preceding section and adopt or modify the advice to the benefit of their Bridge Program. Local Agency bridge personnel are encouraged to contact the WSDOT Local Programs personnel for guidance and advice on bridge program questions.
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-47 January 2020
3-5 FormsThis section contains inspection forms typically used by the State. Local agencies have the option of developing their own forms with similar information or utilizing the forms in this section.
Exhibit 3-11 Bridge Inspection Report
Exhibit 3-12 WSBIS Form
Exhibit 3-13 Scour Field Evaluation
Exhibit 3-14 Daily Site Dive Log
Exhibit 3-15 Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report
Exhibit 3-16 DOT Form 234-030 Prestressed Concrete Damage Drawing Template
Exhibit 3-17 DOT Form 234-048 Girder Elevation Template
Exhibit 3-18 DOT Form 750-001 Fall Protection Plan – Emergency Action Plan
Exhibit 3-19 DOT Form 750-060 Lead Exposure Control Work Plan
Exhibit 3-20 DOT Form 750-090 Respirator Record
Exhibit 3-21 DOT Form 750-094 Confined Space Entry Permit
Exhibit 3-22 Ultrasonic UT Inspection Report
Exhibit 3-23 UT Inspection Schedule
Exhibit 3-24 Pins Summary Sheet
Exhibit 3-25 Pin and Hanger Visual Inspection Report
Exhibit 3-26 Special Features Inspection Report
Exhibit 3-27 Vertical Clearance Card Generic
Exhibit 3-28 Vertical Clearance Card Steel
Exhibit 3-29 Vertical Clearance Card Tunnel
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-48 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-11 Bridge Inspection Report
Agency:
Printed On:
CD Date:
Status: PDWECCWO
BAM
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Page 1 of 1
Intersecting
SID Br. Name Br. No.
Program Mgr:
Carrying
CD Guid:
Route On Mile Post
Mile PostRoute Under
Co-Inspector's SignatureCert #Inspector's Signature
(1679)Pier/Abut/Prot
(1677)Chan/Protection
Structural Eval (1657)
(1658)Deck Geometry
(1659)Underclearance
(1661)Alignment
(1663)Deck Overall
(1671)Superstructure
(1676)Substructure
(1678)Culvert
No Utilities (2675)
Bridge Rails (1684)
Transition (1685)
Guardrails (1686)
Terminals (1687)
Asphalt Depth (2610)
Des Curb Ht (2611)
Bridge Rail Ht (2612)
Year Rebuilt (1336)
(1332)Year Built
Sufficiency Rating
Risk Category
Geometric
Hrs Rep TypeFreq Date
Inspections Performed:
Routine
Special
Fract Crit
UW
Interim
UWI
Damage
Safety
Short Span
In Depth
Operating Tons (1552)
Op RF (1553)
Inventory Tons (1555)
Inv RF (1556)
Operating Level (1660)
Open/Closed (1293)
(1662)Waterway
(1680)Scour
(2693)Soundings Flag
(2688)Revise Rating
(2691)Photos Flag
(2694)Measure Clrnc
Cert Exp Date
Element Description State 1UnitsTotalElement
BMS Elements
State 2 State 3 State 4
Notes
Repairs
Repair No Pr R Repair Descriptions Noted Maint Verified
Inspections Performed and Resources RequiredReport Type Date Frq Hrs Insp CertNo Coinsp Note
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-49 January 2020
Exhibit 3-12 WSBIS Form
Wash
ing
ton
Sta
te
Dep
art
men
t o
f T
ran
sp
ort
ati
on
WS
BIS
Fie
ld I
nve
nto
ry R
ep
ort
AA
N
Revis
ed
RF
C
Appro
ved
Not
Revie
wed
2132
Bridge N
am
e
2023
Owner
County
City
Bridge N
um
ber
1188
1156
Latitu
de
Longtitu
de
Bri
dg
e I
DW
B71
2009
Str
uctu
re ID
Location
1196
1019
1001
1021
1256
1288
1289
1274
1286
Featu
re Inte
rsecte
dF
acili
ties C
arr
ied
Regio
nC
usto
dia
nP
ara
llel
Tem
pora
ry
Facil
itie
sW
B72
1232
1332
1336
Year
Built
Year
ReB
uilt
Bridge
Length
Maxi
mum
S
pan L
ength
NB
IS L
ength
Lanes
On
Curb
to C
urb
D
eck W
idth
Out to
Out
Deck W
idth
Sid
ew
alk
Left
Sid
ew
alk
R
ight
Min
Vert
Ove
r D
eck
Min
Vert
Under
Vert
C
ode
Min
Lat
Under
Rig
ht
Min
Lat
Under
Left
Lat
Code
Navi
gation
Contr
ol C
ode
Skew
A
ngle
Fla
red
Layo
ut
WB
73
2346
1348
1352
1356
1360
1364
1370
1374
1378
1379
1382
1383
1386
1310
1340
1312
1367
Media
n
1291
Appro
ach
Roadw
ay
1397
1432
Route
N
um
ber
Mile
post
AD
TT
ruck
%
On Under
Hwy Class
Service Level
Cro
ssin
gR
ou
teO
nW
B74
Cro
ssin
g D
escription
Horizonta
l C
leara
nce
Route
Dir
Horizonta
l C
leara
nce
Reve
rse D
ir
Deto
ur
Length
Lane
Use
Direction
1433
1434
1435
1445
1451
1490
1491
Tota
l Lanes
Under
1354
1495
Max
Vert
C
leara
nce
Route
Min
Vert
Cle
ara
nce
Route
1499
Max V
ert
Cle
ara
nce
Revers
e
Min
Vert
Cle
ara
nce
Revers
e
1413
2440
Ro
ute
On
2500
2501
2502
1157
2000 Main
Code
Funct.
Cla
ss
1487
1532
1549
1533
1535
1538
1545
1551
1546
1536
1541
1544
1547
Num
ber
Main
S
pans
Num
ber
Appr
Spans
Oper
Rating
Facto
r
Main
S
pan
Desig
n
Appr
Span
Desig
n
Main
S
pan
Mate
rial
Appr
Span
Mate
rial
Serv
ice
On
Serv
ice
Under
Deck
Typ
eW
earing
Surf
ace
Mem
bra
ne
Deck
Pro
tect
Oper
Rating
Meth
od
Desig
nW
B75
Oper
Rating
Tons
1552
1553
1554
Inv
Rating
Facto
r
Inv
Rating
Meth
od
Inv
Rating
Tons
1555
1556
1548
Suff
icie
ncy R
ating:
2646
Insp
ecto
r1990
Date
2920
Insp
ecti
on
1432
Route
Num
ber
Mile
post
AD
TT
ruck
%
On Under
Hwy Class
Service Level
Cro
ssin
gR
ou
teU
nd
er
WB
74
Cro
ssin
g D
escription
Horizonta
l C
leara
nce
Reve
rse D
ir
Horizonta
l C
leara
nce
Route
Dir
Deto
ur
Length
Lane
Use
Direction
1433
1434
1435
1445
1451
1491
1490
Cro
ssin
gLanes
Under
1354
1495
Max
Vert
C
leara
nce
Route
Min
Vert
Cle
ara
nce
Route
1499
Min
Vert
Cle
ara
nce
Revers
e
Max V
ert
Cle
ara
nce
Revers
e
1413
2440
2500
Ro
ute
Un
der
2501
2502
1157
2000 Main
Code
Funct.
Cla
ss
1487
Routine
Fra
ctu
re C
ritical
Underw
ate
r
Specia
l F
eatu
re
2649
Cert
No
2654
Co
-In
sp
ecto
rIn
sp
ecto
rD
ate
Insp
ecti
on
UW
Inte
rim
Inte
rim
Dam
age
In D
epth
Cert
No
Co
-In
sp
ecto
r
Insp
ecto
rD
ate
Insp
ecti
on
Cert
No
Safe
ty
Short
Span
Geom
etr
ic
Info
Invento
ry
Co
-In
sp
ecto
r
Insp
ecti
on
Rep
ort
T
yp
es
Pri
nte
dD
ate
Control Data Guid: Control Data Date:
Shaded f
ield
s a
re t
o b
e
revie
wed e
ach inspection.
Fie
lds in it
alic
s a
re f
or
info
rmation
only
& a
re n
ot
editable
.
Item
2710 S
R
Item
2711 S
D/F
O
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-50 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-13 Scour Field EvaluationInspections and Reports Chapter 3
Page 3-46 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 November 2012
Repairs Warranted:
Date
Location Measurement (ft) Distance was measured from:
Lead Inspector Co-Inspector
Bridge Name
Scour Field EvaluationBridge Number Structure ID
Rail Height from Deck (ft):
Soundings
Inspector's Remarks:
(Taken from top of the upstream bridge rail)Thalweg (ft):Distance to thalweg (ft):
Ice/Debris in Channel
Heavy Growth Along Banks
Channel/Embankments are Eroding/Sloughing
Damage to Riprap/Abutments/Piers
Scour Holes Near Piers/Abutments
Riprap in Place at Piers/Abutments
Boat Required
Divers Required
UBIT Required
Winter Inspection
Repair Required
Monitoring Required
Scour Field Evaluation
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-51 January 2020
Exhibit 3-15 Daily Site Dive Log
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-52 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-15 Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report (Page 1 of 2)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-53 January 2020
Exhibit 3-15 Visual Fracture Critical Inspection Report (Page 2 of 2)
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-54 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-16 DOT Form 234-030 Prestressed Concrete Damage Drawing Template
WF
Bulb
W
Bridge Number:________________
Date: ________________________
Bridge Name:__________________
Looking:______________________Location:______________________
Inspected By:__________________
Notes:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-55 January 2020
Exhibit 3-17 DOT Form 234-048GirderElevationTemplate
DO
T Fo
rm 2
34-0
48
Rev
ised
10/
2015
Gird
er E
leva
tion
Tem
plat
e
Brid
ge N
umbe
r: In
spec
ted
By:
N
otes
:
Brid
ge N
ame:
Lo
okin
g:
Dat
e:
Loca
tion:
Gird
er E
leva
tion
Gird
er B
otto
m
Dra
win
gs n
ot to
sca
le.
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-56 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-18 DOT Form 750-001 Fall Protection Plan – Emergency Action Plan (Page 1 of 2)
Emergency Action PlanFirst Aid / CPR
Names of Trained Personnel on Site
Location of First Aid Equipment
Describe Procedure for Removal of Injured Employee(Note: No removal will be attempted without supervision of qualified emergency rescue personnel)
Emergency Services (call or radio 911 if available)
Location of Phone Phone Number of Sheriff or Police Phone No. of Emergency Resp. Team
Crane
Hoist
Winch
Block / Tackle
Location
Location
Location
Location
Other (Describe)
Verification of ComplianceEmployee Signature
Employee Signature
Employee Signature
Employee Signature
Fall Protection PlanDate Location Supervisor
Description of Work
Recognized Fall Hazards 10’ or more above ground or lower level(check all that apply)
Open-sided walking/working surface
Skylight openingsSurfaces that do not meet the definition of a
Overhead hazards
Method of Fall Protection to be Used (check all that apply)
Assembly, disassembly, and maintenance of all equipment will be done according to manufacturer’s recommended procedures.A visual inspection of all safety equipment will be done daily or before each use.Any defective equipment will be tagged and removed from service immediately.
Procedure for Assembly, Maintenance, Inspection, and Disassembly of System
CatwalksSloped accessWork over waterWelding at heightSet girdersLeading edgeBridge deck
Drilling shaftsWork decksFloor openingWall openingsOpen-sided ramps, runways, platforms
(i.e. roofs, open-sided floors)*
walking/working surface (i.e. top plate beam)*
* Walking/working surface = any area whose dimensions are 45 inches or greater in all direction, through which workers pass or conduct work.
Guardrail systemWarning line (LSO)**Warn line w/ safety monitor (LSO)**Catch platformSafety net
Personal fall arrest systemPersonal fall restraint systemPositioning device systemCovers (floor holes and openings)Horizontal life lines
Vertical life lines and rope grabAppropriate anchors for system used
Other Recognized Hazards
Sun Rain Snow Heat/Ice Cold Noise Darkness
Birds Insects Reptiles Human Other
Environmental
Live hazards
Other Standards that ApplyBoom liftScissor lift
Scaffold w/ guardrailLadders
Aerial liftForklift
Excavation/Trenching
Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) to be used at the worksiteHard hatSafety eyewear
Rain GearFace protection
GlovesProtective clothing
Work boot
Securing toolsTool belts Tool bucket Toe boards Other
* Warn line other than (LSO) shall be erected not less than fifteen feet from unprotected sides of edges of the open side surface
(If checked, specify hazards)
** LSO = (low slopes only 4:12 or less)
DOTForm 750-001Revised 10/2013
A Copy of This Work Plan Must Be On Job Site
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-57 January 2020
Exhibit 3-18 DOT Form 750-001 Fall Protection Plan – Emergency Action Plan (Page 2 of 2)
Emergency Action PlanFirst Aid / CPR
Names of Trained Personnel on Site
Location of First Aid Equipment
Describe Procedure for Removal of Injured Employee(Note: No removal will be attempted without supervision of qualified emergency rescue personnel)
Emergency Services (call or radio 911 if available)
Location of Phone Phone Number of Sheriff or Police Phone No. of Emergency Resp. Team
Crane
Hoist
Winch
Block / Tackle
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Location
Location
Location
Location
Other (Describe)
Verification of ComplianceEmployee Signature
Employee Signature
Employee Signature
Employee Signature
Fall Protection PlanDate Location Supervisor
Description of Work
Recognized Fall Hazards 10’ or more above ground or lower level(check all that apply)
Method of Fall Protection to be Used (check all that apply)
Assembly, disassembly, and maintenance of all equipment will be done according to manufacturer’s recommended procedures.A visual inspection of all safety equipment will be done daily or before each use.Any defective equipment will be tagged and removed from service immediately.
Procedure for Assembly, Maintenance, Inspection, and Disassembly of System
(i.e. roofs, open-sided floors)*
walking/working surface (i.e. top plate beam)*
* Walking/working surface = any area whose dimensions are 45 inches or greater in all direction, through which workers pass or conduct work.
Other Recognized HazardsEnvironmental
Live hazards
Other Standards that Apply
Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) to be used at the worksite
Securing tools
* Warn line other than (LSO) shall be erected not less than fifteen feet from unprotected sides of edges of the open side surface
(If checked, specify hazards)
** LSO = (low slopes only 4:12 or less)
DOTForm 750-001Revised 10/2013
A Copy of This Work Plan Must Be On Job Site
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-58 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-19 DOT Form 750-060 Lead Exposure Control Work Plan(Page 1 of 2)
Dat
ePr
ojec
t Loc
atio
n*S
uper
viso
r/Com
pete
nt P
erso
n
Des
crip
tion
of W
ork
(e.g
. equ
ipm
ent u
sed,
mat
eria
ls in
volv
ed, s
peci
al p
roce
dure
s/pr
actic
es, r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s)
Torc
h bu
rnin
g
Riv
et b
ustin
g
Man
ual d
emol
ition
of s
truct
ures
Man
ual s
crap
ing
Man
ual s
andi
ngH
eat g
un a
pplic
atio
nsPo
wer
tool
s cl
eani
ng w
ith d
ust
Spra
y pa
intin
g w
ith le
ad p
aint
.In
spec
tions
Any
item
not
list
ed
Full-
face
PAP
R (t
ight
fitti
ng)
Hoo
d or
hel
met
PAP
R w
ith m
anuf
actu
rer
Full-
face
airl
ine
resp
irato
r in
cont
inuo
us
Prio
r rem
oval
with
tool
equ
ippe
d
Vent
ilatio
n (m
echa
nica
l)
Empl
oyee
rota
tion
to d
istri
bute
lead
Dus
t sup
pres
sion
/wet
met
hods
Prio
r rem
oval
with
che
mic
al s
tripp
er
Enca
psul
atio
n
Oth
er, d
escr
ibe:
Any
of th
e re
spira
tors
list
ed a
bove
Full-
face
resp
irato
rH
ood
or h
elm
et P
APR
Hal
f-fac
e ai
rline
resp
irato
r in
cont
inuo
us
Any
of th
e re
spira
tors
list
ed a
bove
Hal
f-fac
e re
spira
tor
Lead
Exp
osur
e C
ontr
olW
ork
Plan
No.
of P
eopl
e on
Cre
w
*Sup
ervi
sor/C
ompe
tent
Per
son
mea
ns o
ne w
ho is
cap
able
of i
dent
ifyin
g ex
istin
g an
d pr
edic
tabl
e le
ad h
azar
ds in
the
surro
undi
ng o
r wor
king
con
ditio
ns a
nd w
hoha
s au
thor
izat
ion
to ta
ke p
rom
pt c
orre
ctiv
e m
easu
res
to e
limin
ate
them
.
Cut
ting
Wel
ding
Abra
sive
bla
stin
g
Lead
bur
ning
Pow
er to
ol c
lean
ing
Usi
ng le
ad c
onta
inin
g
Abra
sive
bla
stin
g en
clos
ure
Whe
n le
ad is
pre
sent
if d
oing
thes
e “tr
igge
r tas
ks” (
chec
k al
lth
at a
pply
)
Trea
t as
ifex
pose
d at
this
leve
l1
≥2,
500
µg/m
3(5
0 tim
es th
e PE
L or
mor
e)
≥50
0 µg
/m3
(10
times
the
PEL
or m
ore)
≥50
µg/
m3
to 5
00 µ
g/m
3
Con
tact
you
r saf
ety
offic
efo
r gui
danc
e pr
ior t
o jo
b
Use
app
ropr
iate
resp
irato
ry p
rote
ctio
nfo
r exp
osur
e le
vel
(che
ck p
rote
ctio
n us
ed)
2
with
out d
ust c
olle
ctio
nsy
stem
s
mor
tar
mov
emen
t and
rem
oval
colle
ctio
n sy
stem
s
conf
irmed
APF
of10
00
flow
orpo
sitiv
e pr
essu
rem
ode
flow
or p
ositi
ve p
ress
ure
mod
e
Con
tact
the
safe
ty o
ffice
prio
r to
job
Met
hods
to R
educ
e/C
ontro
l Lea
dEx
posu
re (c
heck
all
that
app
ly)
.3
If yo
u ha
ve re
cent
air
mon
itorin
g on
a s
imila
r job
(e.g
. tas
ks, e
quip
men
t, en
viro
nmen
tal c
ondi
tions
, pai
nt le
ad c
onte
nt),
you
can
use
that
to d
eter
min
e ex
posu
re.
Oth
er a
ppro
pria
te o
ptio
ns m
ay b
e av
aila
ble.
Con
tact
you
r saf
ety
offic
e fo
r mor
e in
form
atio
n. A
PF =
ass
igne
d pr
otec
tion
fact
or (s
ee W
AC
296
-842
-130
05)
1 2
with
dust
cont
rol
expo
sed
wor
k
Allf
easi
ble
cont
rolo
ptio
nsm
ustb
eim
plem
ente
dto
redu
ceex
posu
res
belo
wth
ePE
L. If
resp
irato
rsar
eth
eon
lym
etho
dus
edto
redu
ceex
posu
res,
desc
ribe
inde
tail
why
othe
rcon
trols
are
notf
easi
ble.
3 Req
uire
men
tsfo
rall
lead
wor
k
Alli
tem
sbe
low
are
also
requ
ired
ifex
posu
res
are
ator
abov
eth
ePE
L(5
0m
icro
gram
spe
rcub
icm
eter
ofai
r)or
doin
gtri
gger
task
sw
ithno
mon
itorin
gw
ithin
prev
ious
12m
onth
ssh
owin
gex
posu
res
are
belo
wth
ePE
L
shift
and
plac
edin
seal
edan
dla
bele
dba
gor
othe
rcon
tain
erth
atw
illpr
even
tdis
pers
ion
ofdu
st.
Cov
eral
lsor
othe
rexp
osed
garm
ents
mus
tnev
erbe
take
nho
me.
1. 2.As
requ
ired
bytri
gger
task
leve
lR
ecen
tair
mon
itorin
g:co
ntac
tthe
Safe
tyO
ffice
toid
entif
yap
plic
able
airm
onito
ring
Alle
mpl
oyee
son
job
site
mus
tsig
nth
ele
adco
ntro
lpla
n
Supe
rvis
or/C
ompe
tent
Pers
onPr
inte
dN
ame
Dat
eSi
gned
Supe
rvis
or/C
ompe
tent
Pers
onSi
gnat
ure
DO
TFo
rm 7
50-0
60R
evis
ed 0
5/20
13
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-59 January 2020
Exhibit 3-19 DOT Form 750-060 Lead Exposure Control Work Plan (Page 2 of 2)
Dat
ePr
ojec
tLoc
atio
n*S
uper
viso
r/Com
pete
ntPe
rson
Des
crip
tion
ofW
ork
(e.g
.equ
ipm
entu
sed,
mat
eria
lsin
volv
ed,s
peci
alpr
oced
ures
/pra
ctic
es,r
espo
nsib
ilitie
s)
Lead
Expo
sure
Con
trol
Wor
kPl
anN
o.of
Peop
leon
Cre
w
*Sup
ervi
sor/C
ompe
tent
Pers
onm
eans
one
who
isca
pabl
eof
iden
tifyi
ngex
istin
gan
dpr
edic
tabl
ele
adha
zard
sin
the
surro
undi
ngor
wor
king
cond
ition
san
dw
hoha
sau
thor
izat
ion
tota
kepr
ompt
corre
ctiv
em
easu
res
toel
imin
ate
them
.W
hen
lead
ispr
esen
tifd
oing
thes
e“tr
igge
rtas
ks”(
chec
kal
lth
atap
ply)
Trea
tas
ifex
pose
dat
this
leve
l1
≥2,
500
µg/m
3(5
0tim
esth
ePE
Lor
mor
e)
≥50
0µg
/m3
(10
times
the
PEL
orm
ore)
≥50
µg/m
3to
500
µg/m
3
Con
tact
your
safe
tyof
fice
forg
uida
nce
prio
rto
job
Use
appr
opria
tere
spira
tory
prot
ectio
nfo
rexp
osur
ele
vel
(che
ckpr
otec
tion
used
)
2
with
outd
ustc
olle
ctio
nsy
stem
s
mor
tar
mov
emen
tand
rem
oval
colle
ctio
nsy
stem
s
conf
irmed
APF
of10
00
flow
orpo
sitiv
e pr
essu
rem
ode
flow
orpo
sitiv
e pr
essu
rem
ode
Con
tact
the
safe
tyof
fice
prio
rto
job
Met
hods
toR
educ
e/C
ontro
lLea
dEx
posu
re (c
heck
allt
hata
pply
).3
Ifyo
uha
vere
cent
airm
onito
ring
ona
sim
ilarj
ob(e
.g.t
asks
,equ
ipm
ent,
envi
ronm
enta
lcon
ditio
ns,p
aint
lead
cont
ent),
you
can
use
that
tode
term
ine
expo
sure
.O
ther
appr
opria
teop
tions
may
beav
aila
ble.
Con
tact
your
safe
tyof
fice
form
ore
info
rmat
ion.
APF
=as
sign
edpr
otec
tion
fact
or(s
eeW
AC
296-
842-
1300
5)1 2
with
dust
cont
rol
expo
sed
wor
k
All f
easi
ble
cont
rol o
ptio
ns m
ust b
e im
plem
ente
d to
redu
ce e
xpos
ures
bel
ow th
e PE
L. I
f res
pira
tors
are
the
only
met
hod
used
to re
duce
exp
osur
es,
desc
ribe
in d
etai
l why
oth
er c
ontro
ls a
re n
ot fe
asib
le.
3
All e
mpl
oyee
s tra
ined
in le
ad-s
afe
wor
k pr
actic
esSo
ap, w
ater
(drin
king
wat
er q
ualit
y), a
nd to
wel
s av
aila
ble
and
used
bef
ore
eatin
g, d
rinki
ng, s
mok
ing,
or o
ther
"han
d to
face
" act
iviti
eson
site
or
at fa
cilit
y no
futh
er th
an th
ree
min
utes
aw
ayAr
ea fo
r lun
ch a
nd b
reak
s th
at is
free
of l
ead
cont
amin
atio
n. L
ist l
ocat
ion:
All e
mpl
oyee
s ha
ve b
een
offe
red/
had
acce
ss to
initi
al b
lood
test
ing
Oth
er P
PE (a
s ap
plic
able
) glo
ves,
har
dhat
, wel
ding
glo
ves,
wor
k bo
ots,
eye
pro
tect
ion/
hear
ing
prot
ectio
nN
o ea
ting,
drin
king
, sm
okin
g, o
r oth
er h
and
to fa
ce a
ctiv
ities
con
duct
ed in
lead
wor
k zo
neEq
uipm
ent,
tool
s, w
ork
surfa
ces
whe
re le
ad d
ust m
ay a
ccum
ulat
e ar
e cl
eane
d w
ith H
EPA
vacu
um a
nd/o
r wet
cle
anin
g m
etho
ds a
t end
of
shift
proj
ect
Job
will
be ro
utin
ely
insp
ecte
d by
Sup
ervi
sor/C
ompe
tent
per
son
Air m
onito
ring
has
been
per
form
ed in
the
last
12
mon
ths
on s
imila
r job
or w
ill be
trea
ted
as "t
rigge
r tas
k" e
xpos
ures
leve
ls li
sted
on
prev
ious
pag
e
Req
uire
men
ts fo
r all
lead
wor
k
All i
tem
s be
low
are
als
o re
quire
d if
expo
sure
s ar
e at
or a
bove
the
PEL
(50
mic
rogr
ams
per c
ubic
met
er o
f air)
or d
oing
trig
ger t
asks
with
no
mon
itorin
g w
ithin
pre
viou
s 12
mon
ths
show
ing
expo
sure
s ar
e be
low
the
PEL
Cov
eral
ls: w
orn
durin
g al
l lea
d w
ork,
rem
oved
or H
EPA
vacc
umed
bef
ore
ente
ring
lunc
h/br
eak
area
or l
eavi
ng w
ork
site
, and
rem
oved
at e
nd o
fsh
ift a
nd p
lace
d in
sea
led
and
labe
led
bag
or o
ther
con
tain
er th
at w
ill pr
even
t dis
pers
ion
of d
ust.
Cov
eral
ls o
r oth
er e
xpos
ed g
arm
ents
mus
t nev
er b
e ta
ken
hom
e.R
espi
rato
ry p
rote
ctio
n us
ed s
elec
ted
base
d on
eith
er:
1. 2.As
requ
ired
by tr
igge
r tas
k le
vel
Rec
ent a
ir m
onito
ring:
con
tact
the
Safe
ty O
ffice
to id
entif
y ap
plic
able
air
mon
itorin
gEm
ploy
ees
med
ical
ly c
lear
ed fo
r res
pira
tor u
se a
nd fi
t tes
ted
All e
mpl
oyee
s on
job
site
mus
t sig
n th
e le
ad c
ontro
l pla
n
Supe
rvis
or/C
ompe
tent
Per
son
Prin
ted
Nam
eD
ate
Sign
edSu
perv
isor
/Com
pete
nt P
erso
n Si
gnat
ure
DO
TFo
rm 7
50-0
60R
evis
ed 0
5/20
13
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-60 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-20 DOT Form 750-090 Respirator Record
Name Employee ID Number Organization Code
Supervisor's Name Telephone Number
ExposureWelding/Cutting/BrazingSpray PaintingVehicle Body RepairPavement Marking
LeadPestcidesAsbestosSilica
SolventsBridge MaintenanceAbrasive BlastingGrinding/Sanding
Pigeon DroppingsOther (Specify)
Fit TestDate of Fit Test Type of Fit Test Used
Tester
Qualitative Quantitative N/A
Pass Fail
RespiratorSize
Facepiece
Type
Manufacturer
Model Number Approval Number
Small Medium Large
1/2 Mask Full Face Hood/Helmet
SCBAPAPRAir LineDust / MistOther (Describe)
Chemical CartridgeGas MaskCombination
NorthMSAWillsonSurvivair3MBullard
NorthstarAmerican OpticalScottGlendaleUvexOther
Comments
Respirator Record
DOT Form 750-090Revised 02/2012
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-61 January 2020
Exhibit 3-21 DOT Form 750-094 Confined Space Entry Permit (Page 1 of 2)
Sampling Equipment Name Model/Type Date Calibrated Identification Number
Emergency ServicesEmergency services must be arranged prior to permit-required confined space entry (including 911 services). Onlypersons who have been trained and equipped for entry rescue may enter the space to perform rescue services. Do notattempt an entry rescue if you are not trained and equipped to do so. If a person is down for no apparent cause, you mustassume that toxic gases or an oxygen deficiency exist.
Post entry review of permit conducted by
Confined Space Entry PermitLocation, Description and Classification of Confined Space
Date Purpose of Entry/Work to be done Time Started
Division/Unit Time Completed
Supervisor(s) in Charge of Crew Type of Crew Phone
Requirements Completed (All applicablemust be completed before entry)Lockout - De-energizeLine(s) Broken, Capped or BlankedPurge, Flush, and VentVentilation
Standby Safety Personnel
Full Body Harness with “D” Ring
First Aid/CPR Equipment & TrainedPersonnel
Secure area (post, flag and protectfrom falling objects)
Emergency Escape/Retrieval/Rescue/EquipmentLifelines
Protective Clothing
Respirator (list type)Hot Work Permit
Atmospheric ChecksPeriodic ChecksAcceptable
ConditionsInitial
ChecksChecks After Isolation and
Ventilation% of OxygenL.E.L.Carbon MonoxideHydrogen Sulfide
19.5% to 23%< 10%
< 35 ppm
Hr 1 Hr 2 Hr 3 Hr 4 Hr 5 Hr 6 Hr 7 Hr 8
Atmospheric monitoring conducted by:
Note: continuous/periodic tests shall be performed throughout the job. Contact Region Safety Office with questions.
L.E.L. Lower Explosive Limit, also referred to as lower flammable limit (LFL).
< 10 ppm
Completed N/A
Lighting (explosion proof as necessary)
Communication Equipment
Completed N/A
Add any other requirements necessary for entry
_
Records must be maintained for at least one year.
Date
1
Hazards in Confined SpaceCheck all that apply and ensure each hazard is eliminated or controlled before and during entry:
(Potentially) Hazardous atmosphereMaterial with potential to engulfElectrical shockMoving partsTemperature extremes
which slopes downwards and tapers to a smaller section)
Communication procedures between entrants and attendants
Emergency/Rescue Service Provided by
Phone Number/Contact Information
Describe Procedures (include necessary equipment):
Print Name Initial Authorized Role 2
2 Check the person’s authorized role. Remember, a person cannot be both an attendant and entrant; they can only serveone role.
Entry Supervisor Authorization - All Entry Conditions SatisfiedSignature Date
Permit expiration date and time (may not be longer than required to perform work)
Post entry reviews must be done within one year of entry.
Trapping or asphyxiation hazard (inwardly coverging walls or floor
Any Other hazard that is capable of impairing self rescue or presentsimmediate danger to life or health (describe):
Date Time
Requirements Completed (All applicablemust be completed before entry)
1
DOT Form 750-094Revised 08/2011
Distribution: Original to Division/Unit, Copy to Regional Safety Office
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-62 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-21 DOT Form 750-094 Confined Space Entry Permit (Page 2 of 2)
Sampling Equipment Name Model/Type Date Calibrated Identification Number
Emergency ServicesEmergency services must be arranged prior to permit-required confined space entry (including 911 services). Onlypersons who have been trained and equipped for entry rescue may enter the space to perform rescue services. Do notattempt an entry rescue if you are not trained and equipped to do so. If a person is down for no apparent cause, you mustassume that toxic gases or an oxygen deficiency exist.
Post entry review of permit conducted by
Confined Space Entry PermitLocation, Description and Classification of Confined Space
Date Purpose of Entry/Work to be done Time Started
Division/Unit Time Completed
Supervisor(s) in Charge of Crew Type of Crew Phone
Requirements Completed (All applicablemust be completed before entry)Lockout - De-energizeLine(s) Broken, Capped or BlankedPurge, Flush, and VentVentilation
Standby Safety Personnel
Full Body Harness with “D” Ring
First Aid/CPR Equipment & TrainedPersonnel
Secure area (post, flag and protectfrom falling objects)
Emergency Escape/Retrieval/Rescue/EquipmentLifelines
Protective Clothing
Respirator (list type)Hot Work Permit
Atmospheric ChecksPeriodic ChecksAcceptable
ConditionsInitial
ChecksChecks After Isolation and
Ventilation% of OxygenL.E.L.Carbon MonoxideHydrogen Sulfide
19.5% to 23%< 10%
< 35 ppm
Hr 1 Hr 2 Hr 3 Hr 4 Hr 5 Hr 6 Hr 7 Hr 8
Atmospheric monitoring conducted by:
Note: continuous/periodic tests shall be performed throughout the job. Contact Region Safety Office with questions.
L.E.L. Lower Explosive Limit, also referred to as lower flammable limit (LFL).
< 10 ppm
Completed N/A
Lighting (explosion proof as necessary)
Communication Equipment
Completed N/A
Add any other requirements necessary for entry
_
Records must be maintained for at least one year.
Date
1
Hazards in Confined SpaceCheck all that apply and ensure each hazard is eliminated or controlled before and during entry:
which slopes downwards and tapers to a smaller section)
Communication procedures between entrants and attendants
Emergency/Rescue Service Provided by
Phone Number/Contact Information
Describe Procedures (include necessary equipment):
Print Name Initial Authorized Role 2
Entrant Attendant
Entrant Attendant
Entrant Attendant
Entrant Attendant
Entrant Attendant
Entrant Attendant
Entrant Attendant2 Check the person’s authorized role. Remember, a person cannot be both an attendant and entrant; they can only serve
one role.
Entry Supervisor Authorization - All Entry Conditions Satisfied Signature Date
Permit expiration date and time (may not be longer than required to perform work)
Post entry reviews must be done within one year of entry.
immediate danger to life or health (describe):
Date Time
Requirements Completed (All applicablemust be completed before entry)
1
DOT Form 750-094Revised 08/2011
Distribution: Original to Division/Unit, Copy to Regional Safety Office
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-63 January 2020
Exhibit 3-22 Ultrasonic UT Inspection Report (Page 1 of 2)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Page 3-62 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 November 2012
UT INSPECTION REPORT
Bridge Name:Bridge No:Structure ID:Structure Type:Agency:Milepost:
Inspected items:
Procedures:
Sh. No. Contract Sh. Name
UTM Location
Date: Hours:Inspector ID #:
Co-Inspector Intials:Lead Inspector Intials:
Rivet Server PlansUTM Per Girder or
Truss LineUTM Type
Pins1. When possible, test from both ends of pins.2. Verify pin length shown on back reflection with plans. If back reflection does not match the plans, conduct
manual length measurement and document correct pin length.3. Start test with transducer at or near pin center for back reflection check, then run transducer around full
perimeter of pin, searching for indications or significant loss of back reflection.4. Whenever the test suggests that there is a defect in a pin, store and print out the indication with all
associated equipment and settings documented. The location of the transducer shall also be documented using a clock hand convention (1 O’clock to 12 O’clock).
Note: UTM = Ultrasonic Tested Member
Ultrasonic (UT) Inspection Report.xlsx 1 of 2
Ultrasonic UT Inspection Report(page 1 of 2)
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-64 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-22 Ultrasonic UT Inspection Report (Page 2 of 2)Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 Page 3-63 November 2012
<
<<<<
<<<
LE
FT E
ND
>
>>>>
>>>
<
<<<<
<<<
R
IGH
T EN
D
>>>
>>>>
>C
OM
ME
NTS
:C
OM
ME
NTS
:
DAT
E
d =
in.
D =
in.
in.
S le
ft =
in.
S ri
ght =
in.
H =
in.
h =
in.
9:00
3:00
6:00
12:0
0
9:00
3:00
6:00
12:0
0
LEFT
EN
DFA
CE
RIG
HT
EN
D
FAC
E
PR
OFI
LE L
OO
KIN
G A
HE
AD
ON
STA
TIO
N
LOO
KIN
G
STR
UC
TUR
E I.D
.TR
USS
or G
IRD
ER
PIN
I.D
.To
tal L
engt
h, L
= Ultr
ason
ic (U
T) In
spec
tion
Rep
ort.x
lsx
2 of
2
Ultrasonic UT Inspection Report(page 2 of 2)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-65 January 2020
Exhibit 3-23 UT Inspection Schedule
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Page 3-64 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 November 2012
UT
INSP
ECTI
ON
SC
HED
ULE
Dat
e:H
ours
:In
spec
tor I
D #
:Le
ad In
spec
tor:
Co-
Insp
ecto
r:
VTU
TLo
catio
nFr
eq.
(Mon
ths)
UT
Insp
ectio
n D
ate
Brid
ge N
ame:
Mile
post
:
Con
ditio
n St
ate
Trus
s /
Gird
erSp
an
Brid
ge N
o.:
Stru
ctur
e ID
:St
ruct
ure
Type
:A
genc
y:
Det
ail D
escr
iptio
nR
edun
dant
N
ext
Insp
ectio
nD
ate
UT
Insp
ectio
n S
ched
ule.
xlsx
1 of
1
UT Inspection Schedule
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-66 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-24 Pins Summary Sheet
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 Page 3-65 November 2012
PIN
S SU
MM
AR
Y SH
EET
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
Con
ditio
n St
ate
Brid
ge N
o.:
Stru
ctur
e ID
:H
ours
:
Lead
Insp
ecto
r:
Brid
ge N
ame:
Dat
e:
Trus
s /
Gird
erLo
catio
n
Age
ncy:
Insp
ecto
r ID
#:
Stru
ctur
e Ty
pe:
Co-
Insp
ecto
r:M
ilepo
st:
Det
ail D
escr
iptio
n
Pin
s S
umm
ary
She
et.x
lsx
1 of
1
Pins Summary Sheet
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-67 January 2020
Exhibit 3-25 Pin and Hanger Visual Inspection Report (Page 1 of 2)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Page 3-66 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 November 2012
PIN AND HANGER VISUALINSPECTION REPORT
Bridge Name:Bridge No:Structure ID:Structure Type:Agency:Milepost:
Inspected Items: Pins & Hanger Assemblies
Procedures:
Co-Inspector Signature:
Hours:Date:
Co-Inspector Intials:
Lead Inspector Signature:
Inspector ID #:Lead Inspector Intials:
Hangers1. As required, use mirrors or other equipment to check inside surfaces of members.2. Check for loose or unevenly loaded member sub-elements.3. Check all rivets at connection plates, with emphasis on first row. The first row is the row closest to the edge
of the connection or gusset plate.4. Check for any welds, including plug, tack, or repair welds. Record location of welds, regardless of condition,
and document weld type and category.5. Check members and associated connection or gusset plates for areas of heavy or pitted corrosion, nicks,
gouges, sharp bends, and collision damage. Record location of all these conditions and estimated sectionloss, if applicable.
6. Check all heat straightened or repaired areas. Record location of these areas, regardless of condition.
Pins and Anchor Bolts1. As required, use mirrors or other equipment to check inside surfaces of members.2. Check for pitting, laminar rust, surface deformation, and pack rust. It is important to check the pin, pin nuts,
and all members surrounding the pin for this kind of steel deterioration.3. Check for mobility and noise of pin and surrounding members. If the pin is physically “frozen” it is important
to note this because the added stress can affect other members in the structure.4. Observe and record abnormalities like; alignment, pin wear, loose pin nuts, and amount of nut engagement.
It’s important to note that full nut engagement is when the nut is flush with the pin or the pin is extendingh
Pin and Hanger Visual Inspection Report.xlsx 1 of 2
Location Type
MemberPer Girder or Truss
Line Sh. No.
Rivet Server Plans
Contract Sh. Name
4. Observe and record abnormalities like; alignment, pin wear, loose pin nuts, and amount of nut engagement.It’s important to note that full nut engagement is when the nut is flush with the pin or the pin is extendingpast the nut.
5. Check for paint system failure on pin nuts, pin, and surrounding members.
Pin and Hanger Visual Inspection Report.xlsx 1 of 2
Pin and Hanger Visual Inspection Report(page 1 of 2)
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-68 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-25 Pin and Hanger Visual Inspection Report (Page 2 of 2)Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 Page 3-67 November 2012
PIN
AN
D H
AN
GER
VIS
UA
LIN
SPEC
TIO
N R
EPO
RT
Dat
e:H
ours
:In
spec
tor I
D #
:Le
ad In
spec
tor:
Co-
Insp
ecto
r:
Trus
s /
Gird
erSp
anLo
catio
nFe
atur
eIn
spec
ted
Det
ail D
escr
iptio
nR
emar
ksPi
ns
Han
gers
Age
ncy:
Mile
post
:
Stru
ctur
e Ty
pe:
Stru
ctur
e ID
:B
ridge
No.
:B
ridge
Nam
e:
Pin
and
Han
ger V
isua
l Rep
ort F
orm
.xls
2 of
2
Pin and Hanger Visual Inspection Report(page 2 of 2)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-69 January 2020
Exhibit 3-26 Special Features Inspection Report (Page 1 of 2)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Page 3-68 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 November 2012
SPECIAL FEATURESINSPECTION REPORT
Bridge Name:Bridge No:Structure ID:Structure Type:Agency:Milepost:
Inspected items:
Procedures:
Note: FCM = Fracture Critical Member
Special Features Specail Features TypeFCM Per Girder or
Truss Line
Date:Hours:Inspector ID #:
Contract
Co-Inspector Intials:
Lead Inspector Signature:
Lead Inspector Intials:
Co-Inspector Signature:
Sh. No.
Rivet Server Plans
Sh. Name
1 of 21 of 2
Special Features Inspection Report(page 1 of 2)
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-70 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-26 Special Features Inspection Report (Page 2 of 2)Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.03 Page 3-69November 2012
SPEC
IAL
FEA
TUR
ESIN
SPEC
TIO
N R
EPO
RT
Dat
e:H
ours
:In
spec
tor I
D #
:Le
ad In
spec
tor:
Co-
Insp
ecto
r:
Gird
erPi
erLo
catio
nFe
atur
eIn
spec
ted
Det
ail D
escr
iptio
nR
emar
ks
Brid
ge N
o.:
Brid
ge N
ame:
Mile
post
:A
genc
y:St
ruct
ure
Type
:St
ruct
ure
ID:
2 of
2
Special Features Inspection Report(page 2 of 2)
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-71 January 2020
Exhibit3-27 VerticalClearanceCardGeneric
Vertical measurements are actual measures rounded down to the nearest inch. Posted clearancesare typically 3 inches less than the lowest clearance for a particular through movement.
Note:
Advance Detour Intersection Postingfor Vertical Clearance 14'-0" or less:
Bridge Number:Structure ID:Looking:Measurement Date:
Inspection/Co Initials:Minimum Vertical Clearance Posted For:Posting on Structure:Posting on Shoulder:
Photo Date:
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-72 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Exhibit 3-28 Vertical Clearance Card Steel
Vertical measurements are actual measures rounded down to the nearest inch. Posted clearancesare typically 3 inches less than the lowest clearance for a particular through movement.
Note:
Advance Detour Intersection Postingfor Vertical Clearance 14'-0" or less:
Bridge Number:Structure ID:Looking:Measurement Date:
Inspection/Co Initials:Minimum Vertical Clearance Posted For:Posting on Structure:Posting on Shoulder:
Photo Date:
"A" -
Cur
b Li
ne
"E" -
Cur
b Li
ne
"B" -
Fog
Lin
e
"C" -
Cen
ter L
ine
"D" -
Fog
Lin
e
"F"
LocationA E
Field Measurement
B DC F
"G"
G
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-73 January 2020
Exhibit 3-29 Vertical Clearance Card Tunnel
Vertical measurements are actual measures rounded down to the nearest inch. Posted clearancesare typically 3 inches less than the lowest clearance for a particular through movement.
Note:
Advance Detour Intersection Postingfor Vertical Clearance 14'-0" or less:
Bridge Number:Structure ID:Looking:Measurement Date:
Inspection/Co Initials:Minimum Vertical Clearance Posted For:Posting on Structure:Posting on Shoulder:
Photo Date:
"A" -
Cur
b Li
ne
"E" -
Cur
b Li
ne
"B" -
Fog
Lin
e
"C" -
Cen
ter L
ine
"D" -
Fog
Lin
e
"F"
LocationA E
Field Measurement
B DC F
"G"
G
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-74 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Inspections and Reports Chapter 3
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 Page 3-75 January 2020
3-6 AppendicesAppendix 3-A1 Bridge With Fill on Deck
Appendix 3-A2 Bridge With No Fill on Deck
Appendix 3-A3 Culvert With Fill on Deck
Appendix 3-B UBIT Inspections and Procedures
Appendix 3-C FHWA Letter for Routine Extended Frequency Inspections
Appendix 3-D FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections
Chapter 3 Inspections and Reports
Page 3-76 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.11 January 2020
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-A1-1 January 2018
Appendix 3-A1 Short Span Bridge With Fill on Deck
Short Span Inspections are recommended and performed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Bridge Preservation Office when the following criteria are met:
1. Depth of fill (D) must be less than B/2 (where B = Maximum opening distance).
2. CONCRETE Structures: Opening of 6 feet or more. STEEL Structures: Opening of 6 feet or more. TIMBER Structures: Opening of 4 feet or more.
D
B
3. If the criteria does not meet items 1 and 2 above, the structure is considered to be a maintenance structure. It is the responsibility of the maintenance office in that area to inspect and maintain.
4. The Team Leader that determines that a structure is now a maintenance responsibility shall ensure that this information is passed on to the proper contacts.
Appendix 3-A1 Short Span Bridge With Fill on Deck
Page 3-A1-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-A2-1 January 2018
Appendix 3-A2 Short Span Bridge With No Fill on Deck
Short Span Inspections are recommended and performed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Bridge Preservation Office when the following criteria are met:
1. CONCRETE Structures: Opening of 6 feet or more. STEEL Structures: Opening of 6 feet or more. TIMBER Structures: Opening of 4 feet or more.
2. The Team Leader that determines that a structure is now a maintenance responsibility shall ensure that this information is passed on to the proper contacts.
Appendix 3-A2 Short Span Bridge With No Fill on Deck
Page 3-A2-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-A3-1 January 2018
Appendix 3-A3 Short Span Culvert With Fill on Deck
Short Span Inspections are recommended and performed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Bridge Preservation Office when the following criteria are met:
1. Depth of fill (D) must be less than B/2 (where B = total opening).
2. Total Opening of 8 feet or more.
D
B
3. If the criteria does not meet items 1 and 2 above, the structure is considered to be a maintenance structure. It is the responsibility of the maintenance office in that area to inspect and maintain.
4. The Team Leader that determines that a structure is now a maintenance responsibility shall ensure that this information is passed on to the proper contacts.
Appendix 3-A3 Short Span Culvert With Fill on Deck
Page 3-A3-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-B-1 January 2018
Appendix 3-B UBIT Inspections and Procedures
The following explains the procedures for UBIT inspections.
1. Determine Those Bridges Which Will Require Inspection With a UBIT – On some structures, the team leader will not be able to gain sufficient access to determine the structural condition of the member (for example, floorbeam and stringer connections, a pier cap, or a bearing device at midspan or on top of interior piers that are too high for ladders). If this is the case, a UBIT, ladder, scaffolding, catwalk, boat, or some other means may be required to provide sufficient access.
The records for all structures that require inspection with a UBIT are all contained within the State Bridge Inventory. As part of scheduling for an upcoming inspection season, lists are generated from the inventory for bridges that are due for inspection with a UBIT.
2. Provide for the Use of the UBIT – The UBIT is an expensive piece of equipment and only a few agencies have the budget to purchase one. Along with the State, there are only a few UBIT owners in the Pacific Northwest. These trucks are complicated pieces of equipment which require special expertise to operate and a trained UBIT driver to drive and maintain the truck.
3. Conduct the UBIT Inspection – The UBIT inspection gives “hands on” access to under bridge elements for inspection. The team leader should make the same observations and assessments as would be made during a routine inspection. Given the expense of contracting for the use of this equipment, special care should be taken to ensure that the UBIT inspection is performed efficiently.
It is a good idea to map out an inspection plan that will allow an inspection of the entire under portion of the bridge in as few steps as possible and with as few changes in the positioning of the UBIT as needed. Communication between the inspection team in the bucket and the truck operator should be maintained at all times to ensure the safety of the operation and to allow for proper positioning for the inspection. The team should have any and all inspection equipment required (test hammer, note pad, camera, etc.). Finally, the team leader should ensure that needed traffic control can be provided and that all other necessary special equipment will be available. If these steps are taken, the UBIT inspection can be accomplished quickly and at minimum expense.
4. Record the Inspection Findings on the Bridge Inspection Report – The UBIT inspection findings should be recorded on the Bridge Inspection Report. Follow the same procedures as described for Routine Inspection Reports in Section .
5. Updating the WSBIS Inventory Record – Any other changes needed for the WSBIS Inventory Record (add the inspection date for UBIT, Fracture Critical, and/or Special Inspections) should be entered into BridgeWorks.
Appendix 3-B UBIT Inspections and Procedures
Page 3-B-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018
6. Frequency – The NBIS does not give specific instructions of how often a routine UBIT inspection needs to be completed. To determine the frequency necessary, a history of the bridge condition and deterioration needs to be established. After a few Routine UBIT Inspections are completed the history and deterioration can be determined. For those bridges that do not need a UBIT Routine Inspection each time, the inspection frequency can be rotated. For a “rule of thumb,” the state of Washington has chosen the following:
Type of Structure Frequency (Months)Timber 24Steel Trusses 24Steel Bridges With Pins and Hangers 24 Non-Fracture Critical Steel Bridges 48 Concrete Bridges With Movable Bearings in the Interior Spans 48 Concrete Bridges With Fixed Bearings or No Bearings; Maximum 72
7. Traffic Control – A UBIT inspection will typically require some sort of traffic control where a temporary work zone such as closing a lane of traffic or equivalent shoulder width is set up to provide safety for the inspection team as well as the traveling public. The traffic control plan needs to follow the updated version of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Conrol Devices (MUTCD) for proper signing and flagging in the temporary work zone. Local events and traffic disruptions need to be checked before scheduling a UBIT Truck. Emergency response agencies, schools, the public, and businesses affected by the inspection need to be notified so they can adjust as necessary. All these items need to be checked before committing to the actual inspection date.
8. Fall Protection Plans – The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) require a Fall Protection Plan be completed at each UBIT Inspection site. The retrieval systems and the safety emergency plans need to be known and signed on the Fall Protection Form by all in the work zone prior to beginning the inspection. The State utilizes a Pre-Activity Safety Plan (PASP) prior to all inspections, see Section 3-5 for a copy of the PASP.
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-C-1 January 2018
Appendix 3-C FHWA Letter for Routine Extended Frequency Inspections
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.04 Page 3.06-C-1 November 2014
FHWA Letter for Routine Appendix 3.06-C Extended Frequency Inspections
Appendix 3-C FHWA Letter for Routine Extended Frequency Inspections
Page 3-C-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018
FHWA Letter for Routine Extended Frequency Inspections Appendix 3.06-C
Page 3.06-C-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.04 November 2014
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-D-1 January 2018
Appendix 3-D FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.04 Page 3.06-D-1 November 2014
FHWA Letter for Bridge Appendix 3.06-D Special Feature Inspections
Appendix 3-D FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections
Page 3-D-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018
FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections Appendix 3.06-D
Page 3.06-D-2 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.04 November 2014
FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections Appendix 3-D
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-D-3 January 2018
Appendix 3.06-D FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.04 Page 3.06-D-3 November 2014
Appendix 3-D FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections
Page 3-D-4 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018
FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections Appendix 3.06-D
Page 3.06-D-4 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.04 November 2014
FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections Appendix 3-D
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 Page 3-D-5 January 2018
Appendix 3.06-D FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections
Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.04 Page 3.06-D-5 November 2014
Appendix 3-D FHWA Letter for Bridge Special Feature Inspections
Page 3-D-6 Washington State Bridge Inspection Manual M 36-64.08 January 2018