Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M....

33
Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer Bruce R. Barringer University of Central Florida University of Central Florida Social Responsibility and Ethics

Transcript of Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M....

Page 1: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Chapter 3Chapter 3

©2001 South-Western College Publishing©2001 South-Western College Publishing©2001 South-Western College Publishing©2001 South-Western College Publishing

Pamela S. LewisPamela S. LewisStephen H. GoodmanStephen H. Goodman

Patricia M. FandtPatricia M. Fandt

Slides Prepared bySlides Prepared byBruce R. BarringerBruce R. Barringer

University of Central FloridaUniversity of Central Florida

Pamela S. LewisPamela S. LewisStephen H. GoodmanStephen H. Goodman

Patricia M. FandtPatricia M. Fandt

Slides Prepared bySlides Prepared byBruce R. BarringerBruce R. Barringer

University of Central FloridaUniversity of Central Florida

Social Responsibility and EthicsSocial Responsibility and Ethics

Page 2: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-2Transparency 3-2© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Learning ObjectivesSlide 1 of 4

Learning ObjectivesSlide 1 of 4

1.Discuss the stakeholder view of the firm and discuss the impact of the globalization of business on social responsibility and ethics.

2.Describe the concept of corporate social responsibility and the primary premises upon which it is based.

3.Distinguish among the three perspectives of corporate social responsibility.

Page 3: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-3Transparency 3-3© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Learning ObjectivesSlide 2 of 4

Learning ObjectivesSlide 2 of 4

4.Identify and evaluate different strategies for responding to social issues.

5.Discuss the 10 commandments of social responsibility.

6.Explain what values are, how they form the basis of an individual’s ethical behavior, and how they may vary in a global business environment.

Page 4: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-4Transparency 3-4© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Learning ObjectivesSlide 3 of 4

Learning ObjectivesSlide 3 of 4

7.Describe how advances in information technology have created new ethical challenges.

8.Identify and discuss the differences in the utility, human rights, and justice approaches to ethical dilemmas.

9.Explain the methods used by an organization to encourage ethical business behavior.

Page 5: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-5Transparency 3-5© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Learning ObjectivesSlide 4 of 4

Learning ObjectivesSlide 4 of 4

11. Discuss what is meant by whistleblowing in monitoring ethical behavior.

10. Describe the different approaches used in ethics training programs.

Page 6: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-6Transparency 3-6© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

StakeholdersStakeholders

Stakeholders are all those who are affected by or can affect the activities of the firm.

Page 7: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-7Transparency 3-7© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Primary and Secondary Stakeholders

Primary and Secondary Stakeholders

• Primary Stakeholders– Those who have a formal, official, or

contractual relationship with the organization.

• Secondary Stakeholders– Other societal groups that are affected by the

activities of the firm.

Page 8: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-8Transparency 3-8© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

The Stakeholder View of the Firm

The Stakeholder View of the Firm

Primary Stakeholders

Suppliers

Employees Customers

Owners

Secondary Stakeholders

Environmental Group

Consumer Group

Media ACLU

Local Community

Group

Other Special Interest GroupsOrganization

Page 9: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-9Transparency 3-9© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Corporate Social Responsibility Defined Slide 1 of 2

Corporate Social Responsibility Defined Slide 1 of 2

The interaction between business and the social environment in which it exists.

Page 10: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-10Transparency 3-10© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Corporate Social Responsibility Defined Slide 2 of 2

Corporate Social Responsibility Defined Slide 2 of 2

What specifically does social responsibility mean?

Does it mean thatthe corporation’sactions must not

harm society?

Does it mean thatthe corporation’sactions must not

harm society?

Does it mean that a corporation’sactions shouldbenefit society?

Does it mean that a corporation’sactions shouldbenefit society?

or

Page 11: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-11Transparency 3-11© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

The Premises of the Social Responsibility Debate

The Premises of the Social Responsibility Debate

• Social contract– An implied set of rights and obligations that are

inherent in social policy and assumed by business.

• Moral agent– The obligation of a business to act honorably

and to reflect and enforce values that are consistent with those of society.

Page 12: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-12Transparency 3-12© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Three Perspectives of Social Responsibility

Slide 1 of 2

Three Perspectives of Social Responsibility

Slide 1 of 2

• Economic Perspective– The responsibility of business is to make a

profit within the “rules of the game.”– Organizations cannot be moral agents. Only

individuals can serve as moral agents.

• Public Responsibility– Businesses should act in a way that is

consistent with society’s view of responsible behavior, as well as with established laws and policies.

Page 13: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-13Transparency 3-13© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Three Perspectives of Social Responsibility

Slide 2 of 2

Three Perspectives of Social Responsibility

Slide 2 of 2

• Social Responsiveness– Business should proactively seek to contribute

to society in a positive way.– Organizations should develop an internal

environment that encourages and supports ethical behavior at an individual level.

Page 14: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-14Transparency 3-14© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

The Four Faces of Social Responsibility

The Four Faces of Social Responsibility

Legal/Responsible Legal/Irresponsible

Illegal/Responsible Illegal/Irresponsible

Page 15: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-15Transparency 3-15© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Social Responsibility Strategies Slide 1 of 3

Social Responsibility Strategies Slide 1 of 3

Do Nothing Do Much

Reaction Defense Accommodation Proaction

Continuum of strategies based on the organization’s tendency to be socially

responsible or responsive.

Page 16: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-16Transparency 3-16© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Social Responsibility Strategies Slide 2 of 3

Social Responsibility Strategies Slide 2 of 3

• Reaction– An organization that assumes a reaction stance

simply fails to act in a socially responsible manner.

• Defense– Organizations that pursue a defense strategy

respond to social challenges only when it is necessary to defend their current position.

Page 17: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-17Transparency 3-17© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Social Responsibility Strategies Slide 3 of 3

Social Responsibility Strategies Slide 3 of 3

• Accommodation– Corporations with an accommodation strategy

readily adapt behaviors to comply with public policy and regulation where necessary and, more importantly, attempt to be responsive to public expectations.

• Proaction– Organizations that assume a proaction strategy

subscribe to the notion of social responsiveness.

Page 18: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-18Transparency 3-18© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 1 of 4

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 1 of 4

• Commandment I– Thou shall take corrective action before it is

required.

• Commandment II– Thou shall work with affected constituents to

resolve mutual problems.

• Commandment III– Thou shall work to establish industry-wide

standards and self-regulation.

Page 19: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-19Transparency 3-19© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 2 of 4

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 2 of 4

• Commandment IV– Thou shall publicly admit your mistakes.

• Commandment V– Thou shall get involved in appropriate social

programs.

• Commandment VI– Thou shall help correct environmental

problems.

Page 20: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-20Transparency 3-20© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 3 of 4

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 3 of 4

• Commandment VII– Thou shall monitor the changing social

environment.

• Commandment VIII– Thou shall establish and enforce a corporate

code of ethics.

• Commandment IX– Thou shall take needed public stands on social

issues.

Page 21: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-21Transparency 3-21© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 4 of 4

Ten Commandments of Social Responsibility

Slide 4 of 4

• Commandment X– Thou shall strive to make profits on an ongoing

basis.

Page 22: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-22Transparency 3-22© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

EthicsEthics

• Ethics– The established customs, morals, and

fundamental human relationships that exist throughout the world.

• Ethical Behavior– Behavior that is morally accepted as good or

right as opposed to bad or wrong.

Page 23: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-23Transparency 3-23© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Foundations of EthicsFoundations of Ethics

Values

The relatively permanent and deeply held preferences of individuals or groups.

Instrumental Values Terminal Values

Standards of conduct or methods for

attaining an end.

Goals an individual will ultimately strive

to achieve.

Page 24: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-24Transparency 3-24© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Business Ethics DefinedBusiness Ethics Defined

The application of the general ethical rules to business behavior.

Page 25: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-25Transparency 3-25© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Ethical Dilemma DefinedEthical Dilemma Defined

A situation in which a person must decide whether or not to do something that, although

beneficial to oneself or the organization, may be considered unethical and perhaps illegal.

Page 26: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-26Transparency 3-26© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Examples of Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Managers

Examples of Ethical Dilemmas Faced by Managers

Should I conductpersonal businesson company time?

Should I conductpersonal businesson company time?

Should we spend moreon pollution control?

Should we spend moreon pollution control?

Is it O.K. to give a friend a special rate?Is it O.K. to give a

friend a special rate?

If I find out that myboss took a bribe,

should I tell someone?

If I find out that myboss took a bribe,

should I tell someone?

Page 27: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-27Transparency 3-27© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Managerial Guidelines for Ethical Dilemmas Slide 1 of 2

Managerial Guidelines for Ethical Dilemmas Slide 1 of 2

• Utility Approach– A situation in which decisions are based on an

evaluation of the overall amount of good that will result.

• Human Rights Approach– A situation in which decisions are made in

light of the moral entitlements of human beings.

Page 28: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-28Transparency 3-28© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Managerial Guidelines for Handling Ethical Dilemmas

Slide 2 of 2

Managerial Guidelines for Handling Ethical Dilemmas

Slide 2 of 2

• Justice Approach– A situation in which decisions are based on an

equitable, fair, and impartial distribution of benefits and costs among individuals and groups.

Page 29: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-29Transparency 3-29© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Fostering Improved Business Ethics

Fostering Improved Business Ethics

To foster improved business ethics in an organization, action must be directed at

five levels:

International

Societal

Association

Organizational

Individual

Page 30: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-30Transparency 3-30© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Ways In Which Organizations Foster Business Ethics

Slide 1 of 2

Ways In Which Organizations Foster Business Ethics

Slide 1 of 2

• Code of Ethics– Describes the general value system, ethical

principles, and specific ethical rules that a company tries to apply.

• Ethics Training Programs– Training designed to help managers clarify

their ethical framework and practice self-discipline when making decisions in difficult circumstances.

Page 31: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-31Transparency 3-31© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Ways In Which Organizations Foster Business Ethics

Slide 2 of 2

Ways In Which Organizations Foster Business Ethics

Slide 2 of 2

• Whistleblowing– A whistleblower is someone who exposes

organizational misconduct or wrongdoing to the public.

Page 32: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-32Transparency 3-32© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Checklist for Managers To Use When Facing Ethical Dilemmas

Slide 1 of 2

Checklist for Managers To Use When Facing Ethical Dilemmas

Slide 1 of 2

• Recognize and clarify the dilemma.

• Get all possible facts.

• List all your options.

• Test each option by asking:– “Is it legal? It is right? Is it beneficial?”

• Make your decision.

Page 33: Chapter 3 ©2001 South-Western College Publishing Pamela S. Lewis Stephen H. Goodman Patricia M. Fandt Slides Prepared by Bruce R. Barringer University.

Transparency 3-33Transparency 3-33© 2001 South-Western Publishing© 2001 South-Western Publishing

Checklist for Managers To Use When Facing Ethical Dilemmas

Slide 2 of 2

Checklist for Managers To Use When Facing Ethical Dilemmas

Slide 2 of 2

• Double-check your decision by asking…– “How would I feel if my family found out

about this? How would I feel if my decision was printed in the local newspaper?”

• Take action.