Chapter 8 Contracts: Third Party Rights, Discharge, Breach and Remedies.
Chapter 22 – Remedies for Breach of Sales Contracts
description
Transcript of Chapter 22 – Remedies for Breach of Sales Contracts
22-1
Remedies for Breach of Sales Contracts
PA ET RHC 22
Every great mistake has a halfway moment, a split second when it can be recalled and perhaps remedied.
Pearl S. Buck, novelistWhat America Means to Me (1943)
22-2
Learning Objectives
• Discuss meaning of liquidated damages and cover, and when UCC allows enforcement
• List and describe UCC remedies for an injured buyer or seller
• Describe damages available to injured buyer, including specific performance
22-3
• Parties may agree to remedies in the contract– Agreed remedy applied in
the event of a breach of contract to reduce risk
– Example: “If delivery is not made by September 1, Seller will pay Buyer $1,000 as liquidated damages.”
Agreements as to Remedies
22-4
• In a liquidated damages clause, parties agree on the amount of damages to be paid to the injured party– Enforced if reasonable amount and actual
damages would be difficult to prove• Example: Baker v. International Record
Syndicate, Inc.
– If not enforceable because amount is a penalty or unconscionable, injured party may recover the actual damages suffered
Liquidated Damages
22-5
• In a limitation or exclusion clause, parties agree to limit either the remedies that the law makes available or the damages that can be covered [2–719(1)]– Limitations commonly placed on liability for
consequential damages– Attempt to limit consequential damages for
injury to a person by consumer goods is prima facie unconscionable [2–719(3)]
Limitation or Exclusion
22-6
Star-Shadow Productions, Inc. v. Super 8 Sync Sound System
• Facts: – Star-Shadow rented a camera and bought film,
but neither film nor camera worked until supplier Super 8 finally resolved problem
– Star-Shadow sued Super 8 for consequential damages and Super 8 pointed to limitation of liability clause: “Limitation of Liability: …Except for such replacement this product is sold without warranty or liability even though defect, damage, or loss is caused by negligence or other fault. . . .”
22-7
• Procedural History and Holding: – Trial court found for Super 8– On appeal, Star-Shadow argued the
limitation of liability clause failed to adequately protect them from damages caused by the defective film
– Appellate court stated: “…fact that Star-Shadow has no protection other than their bargained-for remedy of replacement film does not make the limitation of liability clause unconscionable… affirmed…”
Star-Shadow Productions, Inc. v. Super 8 Sync Sound System
22-8
• If buyer breaches the contract and seller has goods, seller has several remedies: – Cancel the contract [2–703(f)] and
withhold delivery of goods [2–703(a)]– Resell manufactured goods and
recover damages (difference between resale price and price buyer agreed to pay by contract [2–706])
Seller’s Remedies
22-9
• Recover purchase price of goods (must hold goods for buyer)
• Recover damages for rejection or repudiation1. difference between contract price and
current market price for the goods and 2. “profit” that seller lost when buyer did not
go through with the contract [2–708]• See Jewish Federation of Greater Des
Moines v. Cedar Forrest Products Co.
More Seller’s Remedies
22-10
• If buyer is insolvent and has the goods, seller may:– Recover purchase price– Reclaim goods in
possession of buyer• If goods are in transit,
seller may stop shipment
More Seller’s Remedies
22-11
• Seller should select alternative that will minimize loss [2–704(2)]
• Example: Madsen v. Murrey & Sons Co., Inc. – Seller, who did not complete manufacture
of goods on buyer’s repudiation, but rather dismantled and largely scrapped the existing goods, was held not to have acted in a commercially reasonable manner
Duty to Mitigate Damages
22-12
• Under the (CISG), aggrieved buyer has four potential types of remedies when a seller breaches the contract:1. “avoidance” of the contract2. an adjustment in price3. specific performance4. an action for damages
Seller’s Remedies & The CISG
22-13
• If seller breaches the contract, the buyer has several remedies: – Buy other goods (cover) and recover
damages from seller based on any additional expense that buyer incurs in obtaining the goods [2–712]
Buyer’s Remedies
Example: KGM Harvesting Co. v.
Fresh Network
22-14
KGM Harvesting Co. v. Fresh Network
• Facts and Opinion: – California lettuce grower (KGM) and food
broker Fresh Network (FN) did business for years
– Lettuce price skyrocketed and KGM refused to supply FN at very low contract price, but sold to others at a profit
– To satisfy customers, FN bought lettuce on open market & sued KGM for cost differential
– Court found in favor of Fresh Network based on UCC 2-712
22-15
• Recover damages based on difference between contract price and current market price of goods [2–713]
• Recover damages for any nonconforming goods accepted by buyer based on difference in value between what buyer received and what buyer should have received [2–714]
More Buyer’s Remedies
22-16
• Obtain specific performance of the contract where goods are unique and cannot be obtained elsewhere [2–716]
• Recover damages on basis-of-the-bargain calculation for fraud and misrepresentation [2-721]– See Green Wood Industrial Co. v.
Forceman Int’l Development Group, Inc.
More Buyer’s Remedies
22-17
Test Your Knowledge
• True=A, False = B– If buyer refuses to accept conforming
goods, seller may recover damages, such as lost profit
– If an insolvent buyer has the goods, the seller may reclaim the goods from buyer
– If seller breaches the contract by failing to deliver the goods, buyer may “cover” and recover damages
22-18
• Multiple Choice– Widgets agreed to deliver 500 cases of
grommets to ToyCo by Sept. 1. Widgets knew ToyCo needed the grommets to make toys for delivery by Dec. 1. Widgets delivered the order Nov. 29. ToyCo may:a) buy grommets elsewhere to coverb) sue for damagesc) obtain specific performanced) both A and Be) all of the above
Test Your Knowledge
22-19
Thought Question
• Assume Naomi had a car to sell that she knew had been in an accident and repaired. Is it ethical to sell a damaged and repaired car without telling the potential buyer?