Chapter 22
-
Upload
benewberry1 -
Category
Technology
-
view
937 -
download
2
Transcript of Chapter 22
![Page 1: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
The Expert Witness
Chapter 22
![Page 2: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
Objectives
• Describe the role of the first responder investigator and this investigator’s possible involvement in a court trial
• Describe the basic premises in the Daubert, Frye, and Kumho cases as they relate to the testimony of an expert witness
• Describe Federal Rule 702 and its impact on the fire investigator
![Page 3: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
Case Studies
• Frye v. United States– Before something can be admitted into court as an
expert opinion, it must have scientific recognition and general acceptance in that specific field
• Daubert, et al. v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals– Testimony cannot be allowed unless generally
accepted in that relevant scientific community
• Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael– Daubert applies to all experts, not just scientists
![Page 4: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
Introduction
• Daubert or Frye has affected almost every federal court case involving expert testimony for the past 80 years
• Under Federal Rule 702 the expert witness is to testify if qualified by their knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education
• Fire investigators must be knowledgeable in all of the rules of the court for which they are about to testify
![Page 5: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
The First Responder Investigator and Court
• A completely filled out fire report includes the identification of the area of origin and the cause of the fire
• The first responder investigator may receive a subpoena to testify– The first call should go up the chain of command
• There is little doubt that the assigned investigator will assist and no doubt that the jurisdiction’s legal counsel will provide guidance
![Page 6: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
The First Responder Investigator and Court (cont’d.)
• The first responder investigator may receive a subpoena to testify– There is no way to predict what will happen
• Most likely, the first responder’s level of training, years of firefighting experience, and expertise will be sufficient to allow that investigator to testify
![Page 7: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
Court Rules
• Federal and state courts have an abundance of rules for every aspect of the trial – A general rule of thumb is that if you can meet
Federal Rule 702, you should have little problem testifying
![Page 8: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
Federal Rule 702
• In 2000, Rule 702 was updated based on the Daubert/Kumho/Joiner trilogy– Helped to solidify that the courts do need to act as
gatekeepers
![Page 9: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
Federal Rule 702 (cont’d.)
• Synopsis of Rule 702– If specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to
understand the evidence• A witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill,
experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if:
• The testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data
• The testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods
• The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case
![Page 10: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
The Future of Courtroom Testimony
• The fire service and the fire investigative field have not heard the last of the Daubert issues – The first step is education on the law, the courts, and
the rules associated with courtroom testimony
![Page 11: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
The Future of Courtroom Testimony
• In the Benfield case, the court allowed the insurance fire investigator to testify based on his credentials– However, following cross-examination, the testimony
was stricken – The expert did not cite any scientific theory and
applied no scientific method – The Benfield decision was not a Supreme Court
decision and, at the time of publication, was an isolated case
![Page 12: Chapter 22](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062704/55626acfd8b42aab1a8b4f54/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
© 2009 Delmar, Cengage Learning
Summary
• The assigned investigator ends up in criminal court on a regular basis
• The Frye, Daubert, and Kumho cases involve the testimony of an expert witness, so they affect the fire service
• Congress created the Federal Rules for court cases, and Rule 702 affirms that the trial court is the gatekeeper