Chapter 2 STUDIES ON THE PATHOGENICITY OF...
-
Upload
nguyenliem -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Chapter 2 STUDIES ON THE PATHOGENICITY OF...
Chapter 2
59
Chapter 2
STUDIES ON THE PATHOGENICITY OF MICROSPORIDIA ISOLATED
FROM INSECT PESTS OF MULBERRY AND SOME OTHER
AGRICULTURAL CROPS TO SILKWORM AND SUSCEPTIBILITY OF
DIFFERENT BREEDS TO PATHOGENIC MICROSPORIDIA
icrosporidiosis of silkworm is caused by a highly virulent parasitic
microsporidian, Nosema bombycis. Interestingly, the first
microsporidian to be named was Nosema bombycis Naegeli in 1857. It was
discovered as the etiological agent of the “Pebrine” epidemic of silkworm that
occurred in Europe in the mid nineteenth century, commanding the attention of many
eminent scientists. Later, by the end of the 19th century, the disease spread to all
sericultural countries of Europe resulting in a drastic decline of silk production. The
noted French microbiologist, Louis Pasteur (1870) was the first who made a detailed
study on the biology of the pathogen. Later, in addition to Nosema bombycis, the
microsporidia belonging to the genera Nosema, Pleistophora and Thelohania were
isolated from silkworm (Fujiwara, 1984a, b) and tentatively designated as M11, M12
and M14 (Nosema sp.), M24, M25 and M27 (Pleistophora sp.) and M32 (Thelohania
sp.). Three microsporidia designated as NIK-2r (Nosema sp., Mysore), NIK-3h
(Nosema sp. M11, Hassan) and NIK-4m (Nosema sp. M12, Mysore) have been
isolated from Karnataka and were found to be different from Nosema bombycis
(Ananthalakshmi et al., 1994). Kishore et al. (1994) have reported that certain species
of Catopsilia which are frequent visitors / inhabitants of the fields around mulberry
gardens carry microsporidian spores which after testing were found to be infective to
silkworm. Samson et al. (1999a, b) also reported certain butterflies containing
microsporidia infective to silkworm.
Microsporidia invade insects through three natural portals of entry viz., oral,
cuticular and ovarial pathways (Kramer, 1976). Entrance by the oral and cuticular
portals results in horizontal transmission and by the ovarial portal in vertical
transmission. These types of transmissions are believed to occur commonly in the
same host generation, but in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, the
microsporidium Nosema pyrausta is transmitted primarily by transovarial (vertical)
`
Chapter 2
60
infection in the first generation and by both vertical and horizontal transmissions in
the second generation (Siegel et al., 1988).
Microsporidian spores are unique in the way they invade a new host. The spores
sometimes leave the host with the faeces but are usually released in large numbers
after the host dies. The infection cycle commences after another host ingests the
environmental spores. By per os means, the microsporidia infect silkworm and the
process of infection initiates with the germination of environmental spores in the
larval midgut. A stimulus due to high pH in the gut environment sets off a series of
events initiating the process of germination. The spores germinate in the larval midgut
and the sporoplasm, extruded from spores, invade the host cells within the reach of
the polar tube and initiate the developmental cycle. The sporoplasms of microsporidia
with long polar tubes penetrate through the midgut and arrive directly at the body
cavity (Ishihara, 1985). Normally, the per oral infection of silkworm larvae with
N.bombycis NIS-001, Nosema sp. NIS-M11, Vairimorpha sp. NIS-M12, Nosema sp.
NIS-M14 and Microsporidium sp. NIS-M25 in silkworm larvae is systemic and
severe. They form environmental spores in all tissues and organs viz., midgut
epithelium, muscles, fat body, silk gland, malpighian tubules etc. as presented in the
Table given below.
Site of infection of different microsporidia in silkworm
Host tissues Microsporidia Gut
epithelium Malpighian
tubules Muscle Fat body
Silk gland
Gonad
N.bombycis NIS-001 + + + + + +
Nosema sp. NIS-M11 - + + + + -
Vairimorpha sp. NIS-M12 - + + + + -
Nosema sp. NIS-M14 - + + + + -
Microsporidium NIS-M25 - + + + + -
Pleistophora sp. NIS-M27 + - - - - -
Thelohania sp. NIS-M32 - + - - - -
Nosema sp. NIK-1s + + + + + +
Nosema sp. NIK-2r + + + + + +
Nosema sp. NIK-3h - + + - + -
Vairimorpha sp. NIK-4m + - - - - - Source: Nataraju et al., 2005
Nosema bombycis NIS-001 is highly gonadotropic while Nosema sp. NIS-M11
is moderately gonadotropic (Han and Watanabe, 1988). Pleistophora sp. exhibits no
Chapter 2
61
evident production of primary spores and produces only uninucleate environmental
spores (Becnel and Andreadis, 1999). Pleistophora sp. NIS-M27 infects merely the
midgut epithelium of silkworm larvae (Tanaka et al., 1972), Thelohania sp. produces
environmental sporogony alone (Becnel and Andreadis, 1999) and Thelohania sp.
NIS-M32 produces uninucleate octospores only in larval muscles of the silkworm
(Fujiwara, 1984a). In a recent study, two new microsporidia isolated from Bihar Hairy
Caterpillar, Spilosoma obliqua have been reported to form spores in all the tissues of
silkworm larvae (Singh et al., 2008).
Multiplication and spore yield of microsporidia in various host systems have
been studied by Lai and Canning (1983), the influence of temperature has been
studied by Fowler and Reeves (1975b), Becnel and Undeen (1992), Madan Mohanan
et al. (2006) and the type of tissue has been studied by Sasidharan et al. (1994) and
Shabir Ahmad Bhat and Nataraju (2007a). Microsporidia penetrate into the
haemocoel and exist extracellularly in the haemolymph or intracellularly within the
cells of various tissues and organs (Tanada and Kaya, 1993). A microsporidian,
Nosema carpocapsae isolated from the larvae of the codling moth, Carpocapsa
(Paillot, 1939) which is an agricultural pest has been reported to parasitize most of the
cells of the host, but the most frequently affected are those of the silk glands,
malpighian tubules, adipose tissue, muscles and the oenocytes. The spores are also
found in the pericardial cells, the epidermal cells, the cells at the base of the hairs, the
genital capsule and the epithelial cells of the posterior midgut (Steinhaus, 1949).
Microsporidian spore formation has been recently observed inside the haemocytes of
silkworm (Selvakumar et al., 2005). As the intensity of infection by microsporidia
varies from one tissue to the other (Sasidharan et al., 1994; Shabir Ahmad Bhat and
Nataraju, 2007a), testing of individual tissues where the intensity of infection is
generally high can be more accurate in the diagnosis of microsporidian infection than
the whole larval crushing. The site of infection and the intensity of infection are
important parameters in characterization of microsporidia infecting silkworm.
As defined by Lacey (1997), the intrinsic capability of a microorganism to
penetrate the host defenses is known as Pathogenicity. Fuxa and Tanada (1987)
described pathogenicity as the disease producing power of the pathogen and the
ability to invade and injure the tissues of the host. The infectivity and pathogenicity of
silkworm microsporidians are determined on the basis of infection rate and mortality
Chapter 2
62
of silkworm larvae, respectively after inoculating orally with environmental spores.
Nosema bombycis NIS-001, Vairimorpha sp. NIS-M12 and Pleistophora sp. NIS-
M27 show the highest infectivity to silkworm larvae. Nosema sp. NIS-M11, NIS-
M14 and Microsporidium sp. NIS-M25 show moderate infectivity to silkworm. On
the other hand, Thelohania sp. NIS-M32 is low in infectivity. With regard to
pathogenicity to silkworm larvae, N.bombycis NIS-001 and Vairimorpha sp. NIS-
M12 are highly pathogenic and usually cause the death of infected larvae before
pupation (Tanaka et al., 1972; Fujiwara, 1980, 1984a, b).
Microsporidia infect silkworm by per os means and the process of infection
initiates with germination of environmental spores in larval midgut. The mode of
transmission of the microsporidian infection from infected host to uninfected host has
been categorized into two types-1) Vertical transmission wherein there is direct
transmission of the pathogen from the parent organism to its progeny (Fine, 1975). 2)
Horizontal transmission wherein transmission of the pathogen is from individual to
individual (Canning, 1982). The extrusion of spores by infected worms through gut
juice and faecal matter leads to the spread of the disease within a healthy population
(Ichikawa, 1935; Ishihara and Fujiwara, 1965; Baig et al., 1988). Horizontal
transmission is a common mechanism for the spread of disease in forest lepidopteran
population that can result in second-order density dependent regulation in the number
of individuals (Dwyer, 1994). Successful horizontal transmission has two components
1) encounter of pathogen propagules in the environment 2) initiation of infection after
encounter (Knell et al., 1998). The probability of healthy individuals encountering
pathogen propagules depends on the host’s life history, behaviour and susceptibility to
the pathogen (Knell et al., 1998; Hajek, 2001), the density of uninfected larvae
(Dwyer, 1991) and the density of propagules in the environment (Onstad and
Maddox, 1989; Reeson et al., 2000). The later depends to a large extent on the density
of infected hosts (Knell et al., 1996; D’Amico et al., 1996; Dwyer et al., 1997; Siegel
et al., 1988; Fenton et al., 2002). Factors to be considered when examining horizontal
transmission include the density of microsporidian spores egested into the
environment by infected individuals that are available for ingestion by other larvae,
and the number of the microsporidian spores ingested to give rise to new infection.
The younger the larvae, the fewer the spores are needed to establish infection
(Wilson, 1974). The silkworm, Bombyx mori L is reared indoor in wooden or iron
Chapter 2
63
racks which are called rearing bed and the contamination takes place through the
faecal matter voided by infected larvae, contaminated trays, seat paper, dust from the
contaminated room and the larvae died due to the disease. The spores, thus, liberated
settle along with the dust on the mulberry leaf forming the source of secondary
contamination in the rearing bed (Singh et al., 2007).
All silkworm breeds are susceptible to microsporidiosis and no breed has been
found to be resistant to infection. Different silkworm breeds differ in their
susceptibility to the microbial infection. Such differences are genetically determined
and have been studied extensively involving silkworm viruses (Tanada and Kaya,
1993). In silkworm, large differences exist among various breeds in their
susceptibility to infection by Nosema bombycis (Chinnaswamy and Devaiah, 1984).
Chinese breeds are more resistant to pebrine pathogen than the Japanese breeds and
the European breeds are the least resistant (Govindan et al., 1998; Singh and
Saratchandra, 2003; Nataraju et al., 2005). Patil and Geethabai (1989) reported that
multivoltine breeds are relatively more resistant than bivoltine breeds. Among
bivoltines, NB7 is most susceptible followed by NB4D2 and KA (Patil and Geethabai,
1989). Silkworm races such as Pure Mysore, Nistari and C.Nichi have high survival
ability than other silkworm races (Devaiah and Krishnaswamy, 1975; Devaiah, 1973;
Patil and Geethabai, 1989). The high survival of Pure Mysore breed is attributed to
the high regenerative capacity of their midgut enabling it to recover fast from the
damages caused by infection (Fujiwara, 1993). However, Liu (1984) reported that a
silkworm race Baipidan is resistant to Nosema bombycis. The wild silkworm,
Antheraea pernyi and Platysamia cecropia are comparatively more resistant to
microsporidiosis than others (Weiser, 1969). In honeybee also, resistance to infection
by Nosema apis is attributed to heterosis and polygenic system (Sidorov et al., 1975).
The studies on the mode of infection, site of infection, pathogenicity, rate of
spread and susceptibility of different silkworm breeds to the five different
microsporidia isolated from lepidopteran insect pests of mulberry and other
agricultural crops constitute the subject matter of this chapter. The results of the study
on the above aspects have been reported and discussed in light of works of other
researchers in the field.
Chapter 2
64
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mode of infection of the isolated microsporidia in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.:
To determine the mode of infection of the isolated microsporidia, the layings of CSR2
breed were received from germplasm bank of Central Sericultural Research and
Training Institute, Mysore. The layings were surface sterilized and incubated
following the standard procedure at 25±1ºC and 80±5% RH. The hatched larvae were
reared as per standard methods till the beginning of 3rd instar. The 3rd instar silkworm
larvae were fed with purified spores of the isolated microsporidia. Also one set of
larvae was fed with spores of Nosema bombycis. The inoculum was prepared from
purified spores of the microsporidia by proper quantification as per standard method
(Cantwell, 1970). One ml of the inoculum (of each microsporidia separately)
containing 1×107 spores/ml was smeared on the mulberry leaf disc (100 cm2 surface
area) and fed to 100 silkworm larvae immediately after second moult (T1). In another
treatment (T2), the surface of eggs of the CSR2 breed at the blue egg stage was
smeared with 1×107 spores/ml of each microsporidia separately. The eggs were
incubated till the onset of hatching and the larvae hatched from treated layings were
reared following the standard procedure (Datta, 1992). Another set of healthy larvae,
immediately after second moult were topically smeared with inoculums of each
microsporidia separately containing 1×107 spores/ml (T3) and kept on sterile surface
for 24 h. After 24 h, the topically treated larvae were dusted with Vijetha. The larvae
were then transferred to disinfected rearing trays and fed with mulberry leaf. In yet
another treatment (T4), the third instar larvae were topically smeared with the
microsporidian spores at a concentration of 1×107 spores/ml, kept on sterile surface
for 24 h. The larvae were then transferred to disinfected rearing trays and fed with
mulberry leaf. In this treatment, dusting of Vijetha was not carried out. Yet another
set of larvae (T5) were reared without any inoculation and it served as control for
comparison purpose. Each treatment consisted of three replications with 100
larvae/replication. The treated and control larvae were reared till cocooning. The dead
larvae and pupae were homogenized and examined for the microsporidian infection
under phase contrast microscope, Nikon (Type-104). The moths were allowed to lay
eggs. All the moths were subjected to microscopic examination. The eggs were
treated with HCl of specific gravity of 1.075 at 46.1oC for 5 minutes to break the
diapause. The layings were incubated at 25±1oC and 80±5% RH for 10 days in an
Chapter 2
65
incubator. Fecundity and Hatching percent were recorded. The dead eggs were
subjected to microscopic infection. The progeny larvae from each treatment were
homogenized individually and examined for microsporidian infection. The
observations were recorded, tabulated and analyzed.
Site of infection of the isolated microsporidia in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.:
To get different infected tissues, an inoculum dosage of 1×107 spores/ml was prepared
by using Neubar haemocytometer (Cantwell, 1970). One ml of the inoculum (1×107
spores/ml) of each microsporidian strain (NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So
and NIK-1Dp) was smeared separately onto a mulberry leaf disc (100 cm2 surface
area) and fed separately to the silkworm larvae of CSR2 breed (100 larvae/treatment)
immediately after 3rd moult. Also one group of 100 larvae was inoculated per orally
with Nosema bombycis spores (1×107 spores/ml) to serve as control for comparison of
results. The second normal feeding was provided to each inoculated batch after 24
hours of microsporidian inoculation and the rearing was continued as per standard
methods till the onset of spinning.
Tissue preparation and microscopic examination:
From second day of post inoculation till the onset of spinning, five larvae were
collected every day at random from each treated batch and different tissues viz.,
midgut, fat bodies, malpighian tubules, trachea, silk gland and gonads were dissected
out in insect saline (0.85% NaCl). The tissues were washed in sterilized distilled
water. Also, the haemolymph was collected by puncturing the proleg of the larvae
with a fine disposable needle in a pre chilled eppendorf tube containing a pinch of
phenyl thiourea and examined under the microscope for spore stage. To examine the
other host tissues, each tissue was weighed and 1 mg of each tissue was homogenized
in 1 ml of distilled water. The microsporidian spores in the homogenate of each tissue
and also in haemolymph were quantified using a Neubar haemocytometer and the
intensity of infection in different tissues during progressive infection was determined
by the standard formula (Cantwell, 1970). The observations were recorded on the
intensity of infection which was shown as (-) for no infection, (+) for low-level
infection, (++) for high-level infection and (+++) for very high infection. The terms
nil, low, high and very high for severity of infection are quantitative indicating no
presence of spores, 0.25 to 7.5×106, 7.75 to 15×106 and 15.25 to 22.5×106 spores/mg
Chapter 2
66
tissue respectively. The same in case of haemolymph was expressed as spores/ml. To
take the microphotographs of the infected tissues, a sample of each tissue was placed
on a clean micro slide. A drop of water was added and another slide was placed over
the tissue, pressed and dragged gently. Mechanical and osmotic pressure cause the
cells to lyse and release the spores from the host tissues. Each tissue smear was then
observed and photographed under phase contrast microscope (Nikon, Type-104 with
camera attachment).
Pathogenicity of the isolated microsporidia to the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.: To
determine the pathogenicity of the microsporidia isolated from lepidopteran insect
pests of mulberry and agricultural crops, a popular bivoltine silkworm breed viz.,
CSR2 was selected. The eggs of this breed were received from germplasm bank of
Central Sericultural Research and Training Institute, Mysore and were incubated after
surface disinfection at 25±1ºC and 80±5% RH. The hatched larvae were reared till the
beginning of third instar following standard silkworm rearing practices under hygienic
conditions. The third instar silkworm larvae were inoculated separately with different
concentrations of the isolated microsporidian spores. Also, one set of larvae inoculated
with different concentrations of Nosema bombycis spores was maintained separately
for comparison. Six concentrations of the pathogen inoculum i.e., 1×103, 1×104,
1×105, 1×106, 1×107 and 1×108 spores/ml were tested for pathogenicity determination
of each microsporidia. These different concentrations were prepared from purified
spores of each isolated microsporidia by serial dilution of the quantified stock
inoculum. The quantification was done following the standard method using Neubar
haemocytometer (Cantwell, 1970). Each inoculum concentration formed a treatment.
For each treatment five replications of 100 larvae were maintained. Different sets of
larvae were inoculated separately with different concentrations of each of the
microsporidian spores isolated from insect pests of mulberry and some other
agricultural crops. One ml of specific concentration of specific microsporidian spores
was smeared on the ventral surface of mulberry leaf and fed to the silkworm larvae
just out of 2nd moult.
Observations on the mortality due to the concerned microsporidia were
recorded daily. The dead larvae were homogenized and examined for the specific
microsporidian infection under phase contrast microscope. The LC50 values for each
microsporidia were determined in terms of cumulative larval mortality for 12 and 15
Chapter 2
67
days PI and in terms of cumulative mortality up to pupal stage for 21 days PI
following Probit analysis (Finney, 1971). The pathogenicity of the isolated
microsporidia was compared with that of N. bombycis and the results were discussed.
Rate of spread of microsporidian infection in silkworm population: To determine
the rate of spread of infection in a fixed population of silkworm, a specific number of
carrier larvae with specific microsporidian infection were introduced into a fixed
healthy population of silkworm larvae. A popular bivoltine silkworm breed CSR2 was
selected. CSR2 larvae were brushed and reared under optimum conditions as
recommended. Immediately after I moult, 600 newly ecdysed second instar larvae
were taken and divided into six groups, each group containing 100 larvae. To ensure
the availability of infected carrier larvae for introduction into a healthy colony of
silkworm, the newly ecdysed second instar larvae were inoculated separately with
NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp microsporidia at infective
spore dosages of 1×108, 1.5×108, 1×107, 1×107 and 1.5×108 spores/ml/100 larvae
respectively to ensure infection in the carrier larvae. Also, one group of 100 larvae
inoculated with the spores of Nosema bombycis (1×106 spores/ml) was kept for
obtaining carrier larvae to be introduced in control batch for comparison. The rearing
of healthy larvae and inoculated larvae was continued till second moult. Before
resumption of feeding after second moult, the microscopical examination of faeces of
the larvae from each inoculated group was made to confirm the presence of spores of
the concerned microsporidia. On zero day of third instar, the infected carrier larvae
were introduced into the healthy colonies in the combinations of 1 in 99 healthy
worms, 3 in 97 healthy worms, 5 in 95 healthy worms and 7 in 93 healthy worms.
Three replications for each treatment were maintained and the rearing was continued
following the standard procedure till spinning and moth emergence. Dead larvae were
microscopically examined for the presence of microsporidian spores to ascertain the
cause of mortality. The mortality due to respective microsporidia was recorded daily.
Data was also collected in respect of larval weight, larval duration, pupal mortality
and number of moths emerged. The moths emerged were tested individually to
determine the percentage of infection at moth stage. Total spread of infection by the
five different microsporidia by way of secondary contamination was calculated. The
data was analyzed statistically to arrive at conclusion.
Chapter 2
68
Susceptibility of different silkworm breeds to the isolated microsporidia: To
determine the susceptibility of different silkworm breeds to the microsporidia isolated
from insect pests of mulberry and agricultural crops, ten popular silkworm
breeds/hybrids viz., Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7, NP1 (Multivoltine breeds), CSR2,
CSR4, CSR18, CSR19 (Bivoltine breeds) and Pure Mysore×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4
(hybrids) were selected. The said breeds/hybrids were selected based on the
characteristics presented in the following Table.
Characteristics of the breeds/hybrids selected for the studies on their susceptibility to the isolated microsporidia
Silkworm breed/hybrid Characteristic (s)
MULTIVOLTINE BREEDS Pure Mysore Most popular and local breed of South India.
Nistari Most popular and local breed of Eastern India. ND7 Newly developed, highly productive multivoltine
breed and component of Jayalaxmi hybrid; under National level race authorization test.
NP1 Newly developed robust multivoltine breed which is in pipeline and subjected to race authorization.
BIVOLTINE BREEDS CSR2 Popular and productive bivoltine breed and an
authorized component of popular hybrid CSR2×CSR4.
CSR4 Popular and productive bivoltine breed and an authorized component of popular hybrid CSR2×CSR4.
CSR18 Authorised robust bivoltine breed, high temperature tolerant and component of CSR18×CSR19.
CSR19 Authorised robust bivoltine breed, high temperature tolerant and component of CSR18×CSR19.
HYBRIDS (CROSS BREEDS) PM×CSR2 Popular multi×bi hybrid.
CSR2×CSR4 Popular bi×bi hybrid.
The layings of the selected breeds were received from the silkworm
germplasm of CSR&TI, Mysore and incubated at 25±1ºC and 80±5% RH. The
hatched larvae were reared following standard rearing method till the beginning of 3rd
instar. The 3rd instar larvae (100 larvae/replication) immediately after 2nd moult were
inoculated separately with the inoculum dosage of 1×107 spores/ml of the isolated
Chapter 2
69
microsporidia and also N. bombycis and were reared till cocooning. The inoculum of
each microsporidia was prepared from the purified stock. Three replications of 100
larvae each were maintained. The observations were recorded on the mortality due to
the microsporidiosis caused by specific microsporidia. For the purpose, the dead
larvae and pupae were homogenized and microscopically examined. Mortality due to
the specific microsporidian infection was recorded. The live moths were examined for
the infection. Data with respect to single cocoon weight, single shell weight and silk
ratio also was recorded and the data was statistically analyzed. The susceptibility of
these breeds to the isolated microsporidia was compared with the susceptibility of
these breeds to N. bombycis.
RESULTS
Mode of infection of the isolated microsporidia in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.:
NIK-1Pr: The results with regard to the mode of infection of NIK-1Pr microsporidian
are presented in Table 2.1. The data indicates that the inoculation of the said
microsporidian to CSR2 larvae by mulberry leaf contamination (T1) resulted in
infection of silkworm leading to a larval and pupal mortality of 42.0 and 9.7%
respectively. The infection at moth stage was recorded as 44.7%. Fecundity and
Hatching percent of the layings from infected parents were reduced significantly (384
and 80.3% respectively) due to infection. The microscopic examination of dead eggs
showed that 86.9% of the dead eggs were infected with the said microsporidian. The
progeny larvae showed an infection of 97.4%. The egg surface contamination with the
microsporidia (T2) also resulted in infection leading to a larval and pupal mortality of
54.3 and 20.0% respectively. 67.0% of the moths emerged were found to be infected.
Fecundity and Hatching percent were significantly reduced (354 and 74.3%
respectively). Infection in dead eggs was 90.1% and the progeny larvae showed
98.5% infection. The set of larvae smeared with the spores of NIK-1Pr on the
integument (T3) followed by Vijetha dusting did not develop infection. Microscopic
examination of the homogenate of larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and the progeny
larvae did not show the presence of microsporidian spores and also, there was no
significant reduction in Fecundity and Hatching percent (498 and 95.5% respectively).
However, the larvae smeared with NIK-1Pr microsporidian spores on the integument
and not dusted with Vijetha (T4) developed infection and a mortality of 30.7 and
8.3% was recorded at larval and pupal stage respectively. The infection at moth stage
Chapter 2
70
was recorded as 40.0%. In this treatment also, Fecundity (413) and Hatching percent
(84.5%) were reduced significantly. In the dead eggs and progeny larvae, infection of
83.9 and 91.6% respectively was recorded. The larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and
progeny larvae from control batches (T5) did not show the presence of microsporidian
spores. The Fecundity and Hatching percent of the control batches were recorded as
505 and 97.0% respectively.
NIK-1Cc: The data as presented in Table 2.2 indicates that the inoculation of NIK-
1Cc microsporidian to CSR2 larvae by mulberry leaf contamination (T1) resulted in
infection of silkworm leading to a larval and pupal mortality of 32.0 and 7.7%
respectively. The infection at moth stage was recorded as 29.3%. Fecundity and
Hatching percent of the layings from infected parents were reduced significantly (417
and 85.8% respectively). However, the microscopic examination of dead eggs and the
progeny larvae did not show the presence of microsporidian spores indicating that
though the said microsporidian infects the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. but the infection
is not passed to progeny from the infected parents. The egg surface contamination
(T2) also resulted in infection leading to a larval and pupal mortality of 39.7 and
18.0% respectively. 38.0% of the emerged moths were found to be infected.
Fecundity and Hatching percent were significantly reduced (406 and 81.4%
respectively). In this treatment also, the dead eggs and progeny larvae were found to
be free from microsporidian infection. The set of larvae smeared with the spores of
NIK-1Cc on the integument (T3) followed by Vijetha dusting did not develop
infection. Microscopic examination of the homogenate of larvae, pupae, moths, dead
eggs and the progeny larvae did not show the presence of microsporidian spores and
also, there was no significant reduction in Fecundity and Hatching percent (499 and
96.4% respectively). However, in the treatment wherein the larvae were smeared with
NIK-1Cc microsporidian spores on the integument and not followed by Vijetha
dusting (T4) developed infection and a mortality of 21.3 and 7.0 % was recorded at
larval and pupal stage respectively. The infection at moth stage was recorded as
23.7%. In this treatment also, Fecundity (429) and Hatching percent (88.3%) were
reduced significantly. The dead eggs and progeny larvae did not show the presence of
microsporidian spores. The larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and progeny larvae from
control batches (T5) did not show the presence of microsporidian spores. The
Chapter 2
71
Fecundity and Hatching percent of the control batches were recorded as 509 and
97.4% respectively.
NIK-1Cpy: The results with regard to the mode of infection of NIK-1Cpy
microsporidian are presented in Table 2.3. The data indicates that the inoculation of
the said microsporidian to CSR2 larvae by mulberry leaf contamination (T1) resulted
in infection of silkworm leading to a larval and pupal mortality of 70.0 and 10.7%
respectively. The infection at moth stage was recorded as 100%. Fecundity and
Hatching percent of the layings from infected parents got significantly reduced (362
and 77.5% respectively). The microscopic examination of dead eggs as well as the
progeny larvae showed an infection of 100%. The egg surface contamination (T2)
also resulted in infection leading to a larval and pupal mortality of 76.0 and 13.3%
respectively and the infection at moth stage was recorded as 100%. Fecundity and
Hatching percent were significantly reduced (343 and 72.7% respectively). Infection
in dead eggs and the progeny larvae was recorded as 100%. The set of larvae smeared
with the spores of the said microsporidian on the integument (T3) followed by Vijetha
dusting did not develop infection and also, there was no significant reduction in
Fecundity and Hatching percent (498 and 95.3% respectively). However, the larvae
smeared with NIK-1Cpy microsporidian spores on the integument and not dusted with
Vijetha (T4) developed infection and a mortality of 41.7 and 9.3% was recorded at
larval and pupal stage respectively. The infection at moth stage was recorded as
91.3%. In this treatment also, Fecundity (388) and Hatching percent (80.9%) were
reduced significantly. In the dead eggs and progeny larvae, infection of 90.3 and
94.0% respectively was recorded. The larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and progeny
larvae from control batches (T5) did not show the microsporidian infection and the
Fecundity and Hatching percent were recorded as 504 and 97.0% respectively.
NIK-1So: The data as presented in Table 2.4 indicates that the inoculation of NIK-
1So microsporidian by mulberry leaf contamination (T1) resulted in infection of
silkworm leading to a mortality of 85.7 and 11.3% at larval and pupal stage
respectively. The infection at moth stage was recorded as 100%. Fecundity and
Hatching percent were reduced significantly (359 and 76.5% respectively). The dead
eggs as well as the progeny larvae showed an infection of 100%. The egg surface
contamination (T2) also resulted in infection and a larval and pupal mortality of 90.3
and 3.7% respectively was recorded. The infection at moth stage was 100%.
Chapter 2
72
Fecundity and Hatching percent were significantly reduced (340 and 71.6 %
respectively). 100% infection was recorded in the dead eggs and the progeny larvae.
The set of larvae smeared with the spores of the said microsporidian on the
integument (T3) followed by Vijetha dusting did not develop infection and also, there
was no significant reduction in Fecundity and Hatching percent (498 and 95.7%
respectively). However, the larvae smeared with NIK- 1So microsporidian spores on
the integument and not followed by Vijetha dusting (T4) developed infection and a
mortality of 45.7 and 10.7% was recorded at larval and pupal stage respectively. The
infection at moth stage was recorded as 95.0%. Fecundity (385) and Hatching percent
(79.5%) were reduced significantly. In the dead eggs and progeny larvae, infection of
94.0 and 96.3% respectively was recorded. The larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and
progeny larvae from control batches (T5) did not show the microsporidian infection
and the Fecundity and Hatching percent were recorded as 503 and 97.0% respectively.
NIK-1Dp: The results with regard to the mode of infection of NIK-1Dp
microsporidian are presented in Table 2.5. The data indicates that the inoculation of
the said microsporidian to CSR2 larvae by mulberry leaf contamination (T1) resulted
in infection of silkworm and a larval mortality of 33.0% was recorded. Similarly,
pupal mortality of 8.3% was recorded. The infection at moth stage was recorded as
32.7%. Fecundity and Hatching percent of the layings from infected parents were
reduced significantly (407 and 84.0% respectively). The microscopic examination of
dead eggs showed that 85.3% of the dead eggs were infected with the said
microsporidian. The progeny larvae showed an infection of 84.1%.The egg surface
contamination (T2) also resulted in infection leading to a larval and pupal mortality of
44.7 and 18.7% respectively. 40.7% of the moths emerged were found to be infected.
Also, Fecundity and Hatching percent were significantly reduced (395 and 79.7%
respectively). Infection in dead eggs was 88.0% and the progeny larvae showed
86.5% infection. The set of larvae smeared with the spores of the said microsporidian
on the integument (T3) followed by Vijetha dusting did not develop infection.
Microscopic examination of the homogenate of larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and
the progeny larvae did not show the presence of microsporidian spores and also, there
was no significant reduction in Fecundity and Hatching percent (499 and 96.3%
respectively). However, in the treatment wherein the larvae were smeared with NIK-
1Dp microsporidian spores on the integument and not dusted with Vijetha (T4),
Chapter 2
73
microsporidian infection developed and a mortality of 24.0 and 8.0% was recorded at
larval and pupal stage respectively. The infection at moth stage was recorded as
28.0%. In this treatment also, Fecundity (420) and Hatching percent (86.0%) were
reduced significantly. In the dead eggs and progeny larvae, infection of 81.8 and
78.5% respectively was recorded. The larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and progeny
larvae from control batches (T5) did not show the presence of microsporidian spores
and the Fecundity and Hatching percent were recorded as 509 and 97.4% respectively.
Nosema bombycis: The data regarding the mode of infection of the standard
microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis as presented in Table 2.6 indicates that the
inoculation of the said microsporidian by mulberry leaf contamination (T1) resulted in
high level of infection in silkworm leading to 100% mortality within the larval stage.
The egg surface contamination treatment (T2) also resulted in higher level of infection
and a mortality of 100% was recorded at larval stage. The set of larvae smeared with
the spores of N.bombycis on the integument (T3) followed by Vijetha dusting did not
develop infection and also, there was no significant reduction in the Fecundity and
Hatching percent (499 and 95.7% respectively). However, the larvae smeared with
Nosema bombycis spores on the integument and not followed by Vijetha dusting (T4)
developed infection and a mortality of 52.0 and 17.0% was recorded at larval and
pupal stage respectively. At moth stage 100% infection was recorded. Fecundity (360)
and Hatching percent (72.1%) were reduced significantly. In the dead eggs and
progeny larvae, infection of 100 % was recorded. The larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs
and progeny larvae from control batches (T5) did not show infection and the
Fecundity and Hatching percent were recorded as 501 and 97.0% respectively.
Site of infection of the isolated microsporidia in the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.:
The results of microscopic examination of different tissues of silkworm infected
separately with five different microsporidia are presented in Tables 2.7 to 2.12 and
Figures 2.1 to 2.6. In batches inoculated with NIK-1Pr (Table 2.7 and Fig. 2.1), the
microsporidian was first noticed in midgut on 8th day Post inoculation (PI) with low
intensity of infection. From 9th day PI onwards, the intensity of infection was high.
The microsporidial presence of low intensity in the fat bodies was first noticed on 9th
day PI. The infection intensity in fat bodies became high on 11th day PI onwards. Low
intensity infection was first sighted on 11th day PI in malpighian tubules, trachea and
Chapter 2
74
haemolymph, whereas in silk glands and gonads, the presence of NIK-1Pr spores was
first noticed only on 12th day PI.
Infection in different tissues of silkworm by microsporidian NIK-1Cc (Table 2.8
and Fig. 2.2) indicates that the microsporidian was first sighted in midgut with low
intensity of infection on 10th day PI. The intensity became high from 12th day PI
onwards. In fat bodies, the microsporidian was first noticed on 11th day PI, where as
in malpighian tubules, trachea and haemolymph, the microsporidian spores were first
noticed on 12th day PI. In silk gland, the microsporidian was first noticed on 13th day
PI. The intensity of infection in tissues other than midgut and fat bodies was low
throughout the observation period of 13 days. In gonads, no microsporidian infection
was noticed till the end of the observation period.
In case of microsporidian NIK-1Cpy, the microsporidian presence of low
intensity was first observed in midgut on 7th day PI (Table 2.9 and Fig. 2.3). The
intensity of infection became high from 8th day PI onwards. In fat bodies,
microsporidian first appeared with low intensity on 8th day PI, which subsequently
became high from 9th day PI onwards. In malpighian tubules, trachea and silk gland,
the microsporidian was first observed on 9th day PI, whereas in gonads and
haemolymph, the microsporidial presence was first noticed on 10th day PI. The
intensity of infection was low till 11th day PI in malpighian tubules, whereas in
trachea, intensity of infection was low till 12th day PI. In silk gland, gonads and
haemolymph, the intensity of infection was low throughout the observation period.
The intensity of infection in different tissues of silkworm by microsporidian
NIK-1So (Table 2.10 and Fig. 2.4) shows its presence with low intensity first in the
midgut on 8th day PI. The infection intensity in the midgut increased from 10th day PI
onwards. In fat bodies, malpighian tubules, trachea, silk gland and gonads, the low
intensity infection was first noticed on 9th day PI, whereas in haemolymph, the
microsporidial presence was first noticed on 10th day PI. In fat bodies, the intensity of
infection increased on 12th day PI whereas in malpighian tubules, the increase in
intensity was noticed on 13th day PI. The intensity of infection remained low in
trachea, silk gland, gonads and haemolymph throughout the observation period.
In the batches inoculated with the microsporidian NIK-1Dp, the low intensity
infection was first noticed in midgut on 9th day PI, in fat bodies and trachea on 10th
Chapter 2
75
day PI, malpighian tubules and silk gland on 11th day PI and gonads and haemolymph
on 12th day PI. The intensity of infection was high on 12th day of PI in midgut and fat
bodies whereas in malpighian tubules, high intensity infection was noticed on 13th day
PI. In remaining tissues viz., trachea, silk gland, gonads and haemolymph, the
intensity of infection was low throughout the observation period of 13 days (Table
2.11 and Fig. 2.5).
The intensity of infection in different tissues of silkworm inoculated with
Nosema bombycis, the standard strain of microsporidia causing pebrine disease in
silkworm, which served as control is presented in Table 2.12 and Fig. 2.6. It is clear
from the data that the first infection of low intensity was noticed as early as on 6th day
PI in midgut, fat bodies and malpighian tubules whereas in trachea, silk gland, gonads
and haemolymph, the N. bombycis spores were first noticed on 7th day PI. In midgut,
the intensity of infection was high on 7th day PI and very high on 9th day PI onwards.
In fat bodies, the intensity of infection was very high on 10th day PI whereas the same
in case of malpighian tubules, trachea and silk gland was observed on 11th day PI. In
other tissues viz., gonads and haemolymph, the intensity of infection was very high on
12th and 13th day PI respectively. For comparison of the infected tissues with that of
the normal tissues, microphotographs of the normal tissues also were taken and are
presented in Fig. 2.7.
Pathogenicity of the isolated microsporidia to the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.: The
results with regard to the pathogenicity of microsporidian spores isolated from insect
pests of mulberry and other agricultural crops are presented in Table 2.13. It is
observed that the microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cpy and NIK-1So did not cause
any mortality in larvae and pupae at an inoculum dose of 1×103 spores/ml whereas,
the microsporidian NIK-1Cc did not elicit any mortality in larvae and pupae at a
concentration of up to 1×105 spores/ml. In the batches infected with microsporidian
NIK-1Dp, no mortality due to microsporidiosis was recorded in the larval stage up to
an innoculum dose of 1×105 spores/ml. However, at this dose, mortality was observed
in pupal stage. The mortality in larvae and pupae due to microsporidiosis was first
recorded in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cpy and NIK-1So at a minimum spore dose of 1×104
spore/ml. In batches inoculated with NIK-1Cc, larval and pupal mortality was
Chapter 2
76
observed at a spore concentration of 1×106 spores/ml and above. The microsporidian
NIK-1Dp was found to elicit larval mortality at a spore dose of 1×106 spore/ml.
Data presented in Table 2.13 shows that percent larval mortality due to infection
with different microsporidia ranged from 1.0 (1×104 spores/ml) to 66.0 (1×108
spores/ml); 19.7 (1×106 spores/ml) to 42.3 (1×108 spores/ml); 6.7 (1×104 spores/ml) to
81.7 (1×108 spores/ml); 9.7 (1×104 spores/ml) to 97.0 (1×108 spores/ml) and 22.7
(1×106 spores/ml) to 45.7% (1×108 spores/ml) in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy,
NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp treated batches respectively. Likewise, the percent mortality
at pupal stage ranged from 1.7 (1×104 spores/ml) to 20.3 (1×108 spores/ml); 9.0
(1×106 spores/ml) to 14.0 (1×108 spores/ml); 3.7 (1×104 spores/ml) to 12.0 (1×108
spores/ml); 3.0 (1×108 spores/ml) to 10.3 (1×107 spores/ml) and 1.7 (1×105 spores/ml)
to 17.3% (1×108 spores/ml) in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-
1Dp treated batches respectively.
It was also observed that adults could successfully emerge in all the batches
treated separately with the isolated microsporidia at different spore concentrations
except in NIK-1So treated batches wherein the adult emergence was nil at the highest
concentration (1×108 spores/ml). A decreasing trend was observed in the percentage
of adult emergence with an increase in the spore concentration of the inoculum in all
the microsporidia tested. At different inoculum doses (1×103,1×104 ,1×105, 1×106,
1×107 and 1×108), the total infection percentage in NIK-1Pr infected batches ranged
from 29.7 to 99.0; in NIK-1Cc, 14.3 to 71.7; in NIK-1Cpy, 31.7 to 100; in NIK-1So,
36.3 to 100 and in NIK-1Dp, 17.7 to 77.3% from the lowest concentration (1×103
spores/ml) to the highest concentration (1×108 spores/ml).
In comparison to the microsporidia isolated from different lepidopteran pests of
mulberry and agricultural crops, in the standard strain, Nosema bombycis, the
mortality at larval and pupal stages was observed at the lowest inoculum dosage
tested (1×103 spores/ml) which increased with the increase in the inoculum dose. The
mortality recorded at larval stage ranged from 3.7 (1×103 spores/ml) to 100% (1×108
spores/ml) and at pupal stage, from 8.3 (1×103 spores/ml) to 18.0% (1×106
spores/ml). At the inoculum dosage of 1×107 and 1×108 spores/ml, all the larvae died
prior to adult eclosion. The total infection recorded was 87.3, 89.7, 92.3, 100, 100 and
100% in the batches treated with the spore concentration of 1×103, 1×104, 1×105,
1×106, 1×107 and 1×108 spores/ml respectively.
Chapter 2
77
The median lethal concentration (LC50) and fiducial limits for the isolated
microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp and also
the standard strain N. bombycis were calculated for cumulative larval mortality up to
12 and 15 days PI and for cumulative pupal mortality up to 21 days PI in CSR2 breed
of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. following the Probit method and the results are
presented in Tables 2.14, 2.15 and 2.16 and graphically represented in Figures 2.8, 2.9
and 2.10 respectively. The LC50 values for 12th day PI (Table 2.14 and Figure 2.8) for
NIK-1Pr microsporidian was 1×108.1 spores/ml with 7.817 and 8.403 as lower and
upper fiducial limits respectively, for NIK-1Cc, 1×1014.6 spores/ml with 9.621 and
19.607 as lower and upper fiducial limits; for NIK-1Cpy, the LC50 value was 1×107.5
spores/ml with 7.317 and 7.870 as lower and upper fiducial limits; for NIK-1So, it
was 1×107.2 spores/ml with 7.028 and 7.506 as lower and upper fiducial limits and for
NIK-1Dp, the same was 1×1011.6 spores/ml with 9.430 and 13.903 as lower and upper
fiducial limits respectively. However, when compared to the isolated microsporidia,
the LC50 value for N.bombycis for 12 days PI was as low as 1×106.9 spores/ml with
6.759 and 7.206 as lower and upper fiducial limits respectively.
The LC50 values estimated for 15th day PI are presented in Table 2.15 and Figure
2.9. The LC50 value for 15 days PI for NIK-1Pr was 1×107.5 spores/ml with 7.275 and
7.781 as lower and upper fiducial limits; for NIK-1Cc, 1×109.5 spores/ml with 8.459
and 10.553 as lower and upper fiducial limits; for NIK-1Cpy, 1×106.7 spores/ml with
6.529 and 6.932 as lower and upper fiducial limits; for NIK-1So 1×106.1 spores/ml
with 5.998 and 6.359 as lower and upper fiducial limits and for NIK-1Dp, 1×108.9
spores/ml with 8.125 and 9.711 as lower and upper fiducial limits respectively. In
comparison to the isolated microsporidia, the estimated LC50 value for 15 days PI for
Nosema bombycis was as low as 1×105.6 spores/ml with 5.526 and 5.856 as lower and
upper fiducial limits respectively.
The estimated values for median lethal concentration (LC50) for 21st day PI for
the isolated microsporidia and also Nosema bombycis are presented in Table 2.16 and
Figure 2.10. For NIK-1Pr microsporidian, the LC50 value for 21 days PI was 1×106.6
spores/ml with 6.443 and 6.811 as lower and upper fiducial limits, for NIK-1Cc, it
was 1×107.5spores/ml with 7.081 and 7.974 as lower and upper fiducial limits, for
NIK-1Cpy, it was 1×105.9 spores/ml with 5.767 and 6.122 as lower and upper fiducial
limits, for NIK-1So, it was 1×105.4 spores/ml with 5.312 and 5.616 as lower and upper
Chapter 2
78
fiducial limits and for NIK-1Dp, the same was as 1×107.2 spores/ml with 7.032 and
7.436 as lower and upper fiducial limits. The LC50 value for 21 days PI for Nosema
bombycis was 1×105.3 spores/ml with 5.150 and 5.579 as lower and upper fiducial
limits respectively.
From the above results, it is observed that among five microsporidia isolated
from lepidopteran pests of mulberry and other agricultural crops, the microsporidian
NIK-1Cc is least virulent with the highest LC50 values of 1×1014.6, 1×109.5 and 1×107.5
spores/ml followed by NIK-1Dp with LC50 values of 1×1011.6, 1×108.9 and 1×107.2
spores/ml; NIK-1Pr with the same as 1×108.1, 1×107.5 and 1×106.6 spores/ml and NIK-
1Cpy with LC50 values of 1×107.5, 1×106.7 and 1×105.9 spores/ml for 12, 15 and 21
days PI respectively. Also, the results reveal that the microsporidian NIK-1So is most
virulent with the lowest LC50 values of 1×107.2, 1×106.1 and 1×105.4 spores/ml for 12,
15 and 21 days respectively. However, based on LC50 values, these microsporidia
were less virulent compared to the standard strain Nosema bombycis wherein the LC50
values were only 1×106.9, 1×105.6 and 1×105.3 spores/ml for 12, 15 and 21 days post
inoculation respectively.
Rate of spread of microsporidian infection in a fixed population of silkworm:
The data on the spread of infection in the healthy colony of silkworm after
introducing carrier larvae (larvae infected with respective microsporidia) and the
effect of this spreading infection with respective microsporidia on larval duration and
larval weight is presented in Table 2.17.
Larval duration: Introduction of microsporidian carrier larvae into healthy colonies
significantly prolonged the larval duration. The larval duration recorded in batches
introduced separately with carrier larvae infected with the five isolated microsporidia
was 24 days. In the batches introduced with Nosema bombycis infected carrier larvae,
the larval duration was recorded as 24 days and 12 hours as against a larval duration
of 23 days in healthy colonies.
Larval weight: The V instar, 6th day larval weight did not differ significantly among
batches introduced separately with carrier larvae (1, 3, 5 and 7) infected with five
isolated microsporidia and ranged between 33.4 and 34.1 g in NIK-1Pr, 33.9 and 34.7
g in NIK-1Cc, 33.4 and 34.8 g in NIK-1Cpy, 34.2 and 34.5 g in NIK-1So and 34.1
and 34.6 g in NIK-1Dp batches. In the standard strain, Nosema bombycis infected
Chapter 2
79
carrier larvae introduced batches, the larval weight recorded was between 33.8 and
34.3 g as against a larval weight of 36.0 g in healthy colonies.
Spread of infection: The results as presented in Table 2.17 show that the larval
mortality due to microsporidian infection in batches introduced with 1, 3, 5 and 7
carrier larvae infected separately with the five isolated microsporidia ranged between
1.0-7.0% in NIK-1Pr, 1.0-5.7% in NIK-1Cc, 3.7-9.0% in NIK-1Cpy, 3.3-7.7% in
NIK-1So and 1.7-7.0% in NIK-1Dp. However, this larval mortality was marginally
high (4.3-10.0%) in the batches introduced with 1, 3, 5 and 7 carrier larvae infected
with the standard strain, Nosema bombycis.
The mortality at pupal stage ranged between 1.0-2.7%, 0.3-1.7%, 0.7-3.7%,
0.7-3.3% and 0.0-1.0% in the batches introduced with 1, 3, 5 and 7 carrier larvae
infected separately with the isolated microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-
1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp respectively. The pupal mortality was slightly more
(2.7-5.0%) in the batches introduced with 1, 3, 5 and 7 carrier larvae infected with
Nosema bombycis.
The percent infection at moth stage ranged between 19.7-25.3% in NIK-1Pr,
9.0-17.7% in NIK-1Cc, 30.7-37.7% in NIK-1Cpy, 23.0-34.7% in NIK-1So and 11.7-
19.3% in NIK-1Dp which was significantly lower than that of Nosema bombycis
infected carrier larvae (1, 3, 5 and 7) introduced batches where it ranged between
40.0-59.0%.
The lowest total spread of infection after introducing the carrier larvae
infected separately with the five isolated microsporidia was recorded in the batches
introduced with 1, 3, 5 and 7 carrier larvae infected with NIK-1Cc which ranged
between 10.3-25.0% followed by NIK-1Dp (13.3-27.3%), NIK-1Pr (21.7-35.0%),
NIK-1So (27.0-45.7%) and NIK-1Cpy (35.0-50.3%) which in turn was significantly
lower compared to the batches introduced with 1, 3, 5 and 7 carrier larvae infected
with the standard strain Nosema bombycis and ranged between 47.0-74.0% (Figures
2.11 to 2.16).
Susceptibility of different silkworm breeds to the isolated microsporidia:
The results of screening of ten silkworm breeds viz., four multivoltine breeds,
four bivoltine breeds and two cross breeds are presented in Tables 2.18 to 2.23.
Chapter 2
80
Multivoltine breeds: The results regarding the susceptibility of multivoltine breeds to
the isolated microsporidia in terms of larval and pupal mortality, infection at moth
stage, total percentage of infection and effect on larval and cocoon characters are
presented in Tables 2.18 and 2.19 respectively.
Larval mortality: The data as presented in Table 2.18 shows that among the
multivoltine breeds screened, ND7 is the most susceptible to all the five isolated
microsporidia with 21.3, 18.3, 27.0, 28.7 and 20.7% larval mortality due to NIK-1Pr,
NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp microsporidia respectively followed by
NP1 with a larval mortality percent of 18.3, 14.7, 22.3, 25.3 and 18.1 which in turn
was followed by Nistari with a larval mortality percent of 15.3, 12.0, 20.3, 22.3 and
14.0 due to NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp microsporidia
respectively. Pure Mysore was found to be least susceptible to the isolated
microsporidia with a larval mortality % of 12.3, 11.3, 17.7, 19.7 and 12.0 due to NIK-
1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp respectively. ND7 was also found
to be most susceptible to Nosema bombycis with a larval mortality of 54.3% followed
by NP1 (50.3%) and Nistari (48.0%). Pure Mysore exhibited lowest susceptibility to
Nosema bombycis also with a larval mortality of 40.7%.
Among the five microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So
and NIK-1Dp, lowest larval mortality was recorded in Pure Mysore (11.3%), Nistari
(12.0%,), ND7 (18.3%) and NP1 (14.7%) respectively due to NIK-1Cc closely
followed by the batches infected with NIK-1Dp with a larval mortality of 12.0, 14.0,
20.7 and 18.1% respectively. Highest larval mortality of 19.7, 22.3, 28.7 and 25.3% in
Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7 and NP1 respectively was observed in the batches
inoculated with the microsporidian NIK-1So. The other microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr
and NIK-1Cpy resulted in intermediate level of larval mortality (12.3, 15.3, 21.3 and
18.3% due to NIK-1Pr microsporidian and 17.7, 20.3, 27.0 and 22.3% due to NIK-
1Cpy microsporidian in Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7 and NP1 batches respectively).
When the mortality caused by the five microsporidia tested is compared with
that due to the standard strain Nosema bombycis, it is observed that infection due to
Nosema bombycis caused significantly higher level of larval mortality in the
multivoltine breeds (40.7, 48.0, 54.3 and 50.3% in Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7 and
NP1 batches respectively).
Chapter 2
81
Pupal mortality: The highest mortality percent at pupal stage due to the isolated
microsporidia was recorded in ND7 (18.0, 13.7, 17.0, 18.7 and 17.3) followed by NP1
(14.7, 10.3, 13.0, 15.0 and 13.3) which was closely followed by Nistari (12.0, 8.7,
10.3, 11.3 and 9.7) due to infection with the isolated microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr,
NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp respectively. The lowest mortality at
pupal stage was recorded in Pure Mysore (9.7, 6.7, 7.7, 8.7 and 8.7%) in the batches
treated with NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK- 1Dp respectively.
The percent pupal mortality due to the standard strain Nosema bombycis also showed
a similar trend and was recorded to be highest in ND7 (21.7%) followed by NP1
(17.7%), Nistari (13.3%) and Pure Mysore (11.3%).
Percent infection at moth stage: The percent infection in moths in the
microsporidian-inoculated batches ranged from 22.3 to 70.7% in Pure Mysore, 22.7 to
67.3% in Nistari, 22.3 to 56.0% in ND7 and 22.7 to 63.7% in NP1.
Total percentage of infection: The total infection recorded in the batches inoculated
with NIK-1Cpy and NIK-1So was 96.0% and above in all the four multivoltine breeds
tested. The lowest total infection was recorded in NIK-1Cc infected batches (40.7,
43.7, 56.7, and 48.7% in Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7 and NP1 respectively). In NIK-
1Pr and NIK-1Dp infected batches, total infection of intermediate level was recorded
(56.7, 60.7, 71.3 and 65.3% due to NIK-1Pr and 43.0, 46.4, 60.3 and 54.2% due to
NIK- 1Dp in Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7 and NP1 batches respectively). In Nosema
bombycis inoculated batches, which served as control for comparison, the total
infection recorded was 100% in all the four multivoltine breeds tested (Table 2.18 and
Figures 2.17 to 2.22).
The data with regard to the effect of infection with the isolated microsporidia
on the quantitative characters such as larval and cocoon characters of the survivors is
presented in Table 2.19.
Larval weight: The V instar 6th day larval weight of the microsporidian inoculated
batches got significantly reduced and ranged from 16.18 to 20.18 g in Pure Mysore,
18.11 to 21.31 g in Nistari, 33.12 to 37.48 g in ND7 and 31.49 to 34.03 g in NP1
compared to the normal control batches wherein the V instar 6th day larval weight was
recorded as 22.02 g in Pure Mysore, 24.41 g in Nistari, 38.92 g in ND7 and 36.62 g in
NP1 batches.
Chapter 2
82
Larval duration: The larval duration was increased from 26 to 28 days in Pure
Mysore, 23 to 25 days in Nistari, 25 to 26 days in ND7 and 24 to 25 days in NP1
batches infected separately with the five isolated microsporidia when compared with
the normal control. A similar trend with respect to larval duration was observed in the
batches inoculated with the standard strain Nosema bombycis except in Pure Mysore
wherein larval duration was increased from 26 to 29 days.
Single cocoon weight: Infection with the isolated microsporidia and N.bombycis
significantly lowered the cocoon weight and the cocoon weight of the treated batches
ranged from 0.730 to 0.788 g in Pure Mysore, 0.825 to 0.875 g in Nistari, 1.170 to
1.197 g in ND7 and 1.173 to 1.202 g in NP1 compared to the normal control batches
wherein the cocoon weight of 0.805 g in Pure Mysore, 0.911 g in Nistari, 1.220 g in
ND7 and 1.221 g in NP1 batches was recorded.
Single shell weight: Results presented in Table 2.19 show that the single shell weight
in the batches treated separately with the isolated microsporidia and Nosema
bombycis got reduced due to infection and ranged from 0.085 to 0.109 g in Pure
Mysore, 0.105 to 0.122 g in Nistari, 0.207 to 0.222 g in ND7 and 0.193 to 0.216 g in
NP1 compared to the normal control batches where the same was recorded as 0.115 g
in Pure Mysore, 0.133 g in Nistari, 0.246 g in ND7 and 0.227 g in NP1 batches.
Shell percentage (SR%): Infection with the isolated microsporidia significantly
reduced the shell percentage of the multivoltine breeds studied. The highest reduction
in the shell percentage was recorded in NIK-1So inoculated batches (13.32% in Pure
Mysore, 13.56% in Nistari, 18.17% in ND7 and 17.39% in NP1) followed by NIK-
1Cpy inoculated batches (13.38% in Pure Mysore, 13.64% in Nistari, 18.25% in ND7
and 17.43% in NP1), NIK-1Pr inoculated batches (13.54% in Pure Mysore, 13.75% in
Nistari, 18.36% in ND7 and 17.55% in NP1), NIK-1Dp inoculated batches (13.79%
in Pure Mysore, 13.91% in Nistari, 18.46% in ND7 and 17.71% in NP1) which in turn
was followed by NIK-1Cc inoculated batches (13.87% in Pure Mysore, 13.97% in
Nistari, 18.57% in ND7 and 17.94% in NP1).
Compared to the reduction in SR% by the isolated microsporidia, the reduction
in SR% was significantly higher in the batches inoculated with the standard
microsporidian strain, N.bombycis and was recorded as 11.64, 12.72, 17.69 and
16.45% in Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7 and NP1 respectively. The results, therefore,
Chapter 2
83
clearly indicate that the shell percentage in the microsporidia inoculated batches was
significantly lower compared to that of normal control batches wherein shell
percentage of 14.24, 14.64, 20.13 and 18.55% was recorded in Pure Mysore, Nistari,
ND7 and NP1 respectively. The percentage reduction in the SR% of the multivoltine
breeds inoculated separately with the isolated microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc,
NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So, NIK-1Dp and the standard strain N.bombycis compared to that
of the non inoculated control batches is graphically represented in Figures 2.23 to
2.28.
Bivoltine breeds: The results on the susceptibility of bivoltine breeds to the isolated
microsporidia in respect of larval and pupal mortality, infection at moth stage, total
infection and effect on larval and cocoon characters are furnished in in Tables 2.20
and 2.21 respectively.
Larval mortality: The data as presented in Table 2.20 reveals that among the
bivoltine breeds, CSR2 has shown highest susceptibility to all the five microsporidia
tested showing a percent larval mortality of 49.3, 33.3, 57.3, 60.0 and 34.3 in NIK-
1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated batches respectively
followed by CSR4 with a larval mortality of 46.3, 30.3, 54.0, 56.3 and 31.0% in NIK-
1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated batches respectively
which in turn was followed by CSR19 with a larval mortality of 37.3, 23.0, 46.0, 48.7
and 24.3% in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated
batches respectively. CSR18 was found least susceptible to all the microsporidia
tested showing a percent larval mortality of 35.3, 20.7 , 42.3 , 45.7 and 21.3%
respectively in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated
batches. Results of the study also reveal that CSR2 breed was most susceptible to the
standard strain Nosema bombycis with a larval mortality of 95.3% followed by CSR4
(93.3%), CSR19 (87.7%) and CSR18 (85.3%).
Among the five microsporidia, the lowest larval mortality of 33.3, 30.3, 20.7
and 23.0% respectively was recorded in CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19 batches
infected with the microsporidian NIK-1Cc which was closely followed by NIK-1Dp
infected batches with a larval mortality of 34.3, 31.0, 21.3 and 24.3%. Highest larval
mortality of 60.0, 56.3, 45.7 and 48.7% was recorded in CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and
CSR19 batches respectively inoculated with NIK-1So. The other microsporidia viz.,
NIK-1Pr and NIK-1Cpy resulted in an intermediate level of larval mortality which
Chapter 2
84
was recorded as 49.3, 46.3, 35.3 and 37.3% (NIK-1Pr) and 57.3, 54.0, 42.3 and 46.0%
(NIK-1Cpy) in CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19 breeds respectively. Compared to
the larval mortality caused due to infection with the isolated microsporidia, the
infection with the standard microsporidian strain, N. bombycis resulted in significantly
higher level of larval mortality in the bivoltine breeds tested (95.3, 93.3, 85.3 and
87.7% in CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19 batches respectively).
Pupal mortality: The highest mortality at pupal stage was recorded in CSR2 (14.3,
9.7, 13.0, 10.3 and 12.3%) followed by CSR4 (11.7, 8.3, 10.7, 9.7 and 10.3%),
CSR19 with a pupal mortality of 7.7, 5.3, 8.3, 8.7 and 8.7% in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc,
NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated batches respectively. The lowest
mortality at pupal stage was recorded in CSR18 batches (6.3, 4.3, 7.0, 8.0 and 7.3%)
due to the microsporidia NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp
respectively. In the batches inoculated with the standard strain, Nosema bombycis,
pupal mortality of 1.7, 2.0, 3.3 and 2.7% was recorded in CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and
CSR19 breeds respectively (Table 2.20).
Percent infection at moth stage: The infection percent at moth stage due to the
isolated microsporidia ranged from 20.3 to 29.7% in CSR2, 20.7 to 35.3% in CSR4,
20.7 to 45.7% in CSR18 and 21.7 to 42.7% in CSR19.
Total percentage of infection: The total infection (from larval to moth stage) in the
batches inoculated with the microsporidia NIK-1Cpy and NIK-1So was 95.0% and
above in the four bivoltine breeds tested. The lowest total infection was recorded in
the batches infected with NIK-1Cc (63.3% in CSR2, 59.3% in CSR4, 45.7% in
CSR18 and 50.0% in CSR19). In the batches inoculated separately with NIK-1Pr and
NIK-1Dp, an intermediate level of total infection was recorded (84.7, 81.3, 69.0 and
72.0% due to NIK-1Pr and 67.7, 62.7, 51.0 and 55.0% due to NIK-1Dp in CSR2,
CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19 batches respectively). In the batches inoculated with N.
bombycis, a total infection of 100% was recorded in all the four bivoltine breeds
tested (Table 2.20 and Figures 2.29 to 2.34).
The data on the impact of infection caused by isolated microsporidia on larval
and cocoon characters of the four bivoltine breeds is furnished in Table 2.21.
Larval weight: Data indicates that there was a significant reduction in the V instar
6th day larval weight in the inoculated batches compared to the normal control batches
Chapter 2
85
and ranged from 30.75 to 37.85 g in CSR2, 28.32 to 36.37 g in CSR4, 27.21 to 34.07
g in CSR18 and 25.57 to 32.01 g in CSR19 batches. In normal control batches, the V
instar larval weight of 39.21g (CSR2), 38.02 g (CSR4), 36.01 g (CSR18) and 34.02 g
(CSR19) was recorded.
Larval duration: The larval duration was increased from 24 to 25 days in CSR2 and
23 to 24 days in CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19 batches inoculated with the isolated
microsporidia compared to the normal control. A similar trend was observed in
N.bombycis inoculated batches except in CSR4 wherein the larval duration was
increased from 23 to 25 days.
Single cocoon weight: In the inoculated batches, the single cocoon weight was
reduced significantly and ranged from 1.435 to 1.489 g in CSR2, 1.495 to 1.540 g in
CSR4, 1.490 to 1.533 g in CSR18 and 1.431 to 1.480 g in CSR19 compared to the
non inoculated control batches (1.552 g in CSR2, 1.600 g in CSR4, 1.570 g in CSR18
and 1.520 g in CSR19).
Single shell weight: The single shell weight in the batches inoculated separately with
the isolated microsporidia and Nosema bombycis was reduced due to infection and
ranged from 0.255 to 0.300 g in CSR2, 0.260 to 0.309 g in CSR4, 0.258 to 0.305 g in
CSR18 and 0.242 to 0.289 g in CSR19 compared to the normal control wherein the
same was recorded as 0.343 g in CSR2, 0.352 g in CSR4, 0.340 g in CSR18 and
0.320 g in CSR19.
Shell percentage (SR%): Infection with the isolated microsporidia significantly
reduced the shell percentage of the bivoltine breeds studied. The highest reduction in
the shell percentage was recorded in NIK-1So inoculated batches (19.63% in CSR2,
19.27% in CSR4, 19.18% in CSR18 and 18.47% in CSR19) followed by NIK-1Cpy
(19.70% in CSR2, 19.37% in CSR4, 19.25% in CSR18 and 18.62% in CSR19), NIK-
1Pr (19.86, 19.52, 19.46 and 18.76% in CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19
respectively), NIK-1Dp inoculated batches (19.97, 19.76, 19.62 and 18.98% in CSR2,
CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19 respectively) which in turn was followed by NIK-1Cc
inoculated batches (20.14% in CSR2, 20.06% in CSR4, 19.89% in CSR18 and
19.52% in CSR19). Compared to the reduction in SR% by the isolated microsporidia,
the reduction in SR% was significantly higher in the batches inoculated with Nosema
bombycis and SR% was recorded as 17.77% in CSR2, 17.39% in CSR4, 17.31% in
Chapter 2
86
CSR18 and 16.91% in CSR19. The shell percentage recorded in the normal control
batches was 22.11, 22.00, 21.67 and 21.04% in CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19
breeds respectively (Table 2.21).The percentage reduction in the SR% of the bivoltine
breeds inoculated separately with the isolated microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc,
NIK-1Cpy, NIK- 1So, NIK- 1Dp and the standard strain N.bombycis compared to that
of the non inoculated control batches is graphically represented in Figures 2.35 to
2.40.
Cross breeds: The results on the susceptibility of two popular cross breeds of
silkworm to the isolated microsporidia in terms of larval and pupal mortality, moths
infected, total infection and effect on larval and cocoon characters are furnished in
Tables 2.22 and 2.23 respectively.
Larval mortality: The data as presented in Table 2.22 shows that among the two
cross breeds screened, CSR2×CSR4 was found to be comparatively more susceptible
to infection by the isolated microsporidia with a larval mortality of 42.3, 26.3, 50.3,
52.7 and 27.3% in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated
batches respectively. Also, it was more susceptible to Nosema bombycis, which
caused a larval mortality of 90.3%. PM×CSR2 was recorded to be less susceptible to
the isolated microsporidia. A larval mortality of 11.0, 6.7, 14.7, 16.3 and 10.3% was
recorded in PM×CSR2 batches inoculated with NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-
1So and NIK-1Dp respectively. In Nosema bombycis inoculated batches, a larval
mortality of 38.7% was recorded. Among the five microsporidia, lowest larval
mortality of 6.7% in PM×CSR2 and 26.3% in CSR2 × CSR4 was recorded in batches
infected with NIK-1Cc closely followed by the batches infected with NIK- 1Dp with
a larval mortality of 10.3 and 27.3% in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4 batches
respectively. Highest larval mortality of 16.3 and 52.7% respectively in PM×CSR2
and CSR2×CSR4 was observed in the batches inoculated with the microsporidian
NIK-1So. The other microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr and NIK-1Cpy resulted in
intermediate level of larval mortality (11.0 to 14.7% in PM×CSR2 and 42.3 to 50.3%
in CSR2×CSR4 batches respectively). When the mortality caused by the five
microsporidia is compared with that due to Nosema bombycis, which is a standard
microsporidian strain causing pebrine disease in silkworm, it is observed that
infection with Nosema bombycis caused significantly higher level of larval mortality
(38.7% in PM×CSR2 and 90.3% in CSR2×CSR4 batches).
Chapter 2
87
Pupal mortality: The data with regard to mortality at pupal stage in the two cross
breeds tested as presented in Table 2.22 shows that pupal mortality percent was more
in CSR2×CSR4 batches (10.0, 6.3, 9.7, 9.3 and 9.7% in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-
1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated batches respectively). In PM×CSR2, 7.3,
4.7, 6.0, 8.3 and 7.7% pupal mortality was recorded in NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-
1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp inoculated batches respectively. In the batches
inoculated with N. bombycis, 9.7% pupal mortality in PM×CSR2 and 1.3% pupal
mortality in CSR2×CSR4 was observed.
Percent infection at moth stage: The infection percent at moth stage due to the
isolated microsporidia and Nosema bombycis ranged from 20.7 to 72.3% in
PM×CSR2 and 8.3 to 38.0% in CSR2×CSR4 batches.
Total percentage of infection: The total infection in the batches inoculated with
NIK-1Cpy and NIK-1So was 93.0% and above in both the cross breeds. The lowest
total infection was recorded in NIK-1Cc infected batches (32.3% in PM × CSR2 and
54.3% in CSR2 × CSR4). In NIK-1Pr and NIK-1Dp, total infection recorded was of
intermediate level (52.0 and 38.7% in PM×CSR2 and 77.7 and 58.7% in CSR2×CSR4
respectively). In the Nosema bombycis inoculated batches, which were kept as control
for comparison purpose, the total infection recorded was 99.0-100% (Table 2.22 and
Figures 2.41 to 2.46).
The effect of microsporidian infection on the larval and cocoon characters of the
two cross breeds of silkworm is presented in Table 2.23.
Larval weight: The V instar larval weight of the microsporidia inoculated batches
was lowered significantly and ranged from 37.01 to 37.20 g in PM×CSR2 batches and
43.42 to 44.01 g in CSR2×CSR4 batches compared to that of non-inoculated control
batches (38.21 g in PM×CSR2 and 45.02 g in CSR2×CSR4).
Larval duration: The larval duration was increased from 25 to 26 days in PM×CSR2
and from 23 to 24 days in CSR2×CSR4 batches infected separately with five
microsporidia when compared to normal control. Also, in the batches inoculated with
Nosema bombycis, the larval duration was increased from 25 to 26 days and 23 to 25
days in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4 batches respectively.
Single cocoon weight: Single cocoon weight of the microsporidia inoculated batches
was significantly reduced due to infection. In PM×CSR2, it ranged from 1.504 to
Chapter 2
88
1.534 g and in CSR2×CSR4, it ranged from 1.646 to 1.681 g compared to the non-
inoculated control batches (1.604 g in PM×CSR2 and 1.721g in CSR2×CSR4).
Similar trend was also noticed in terms of single shell weight and shell ratio in
microsporidia inoculated batches vis-à-vis normal control in both the hybrids.
Single shell weight: In the cross breeds inoculated separately with the isolated
microsporidia and Nosema bombycis, single shell weight was recorded to be
significantly reduced and ranged from 0.247 to 0.259 g in PM×CSR2 and 0.311 to
0.345 g in CSR2×CSR4 compared to the normal control batches where shell weight of
0.284 g in PM×CSR2 and 0.382 g in CSR2×CSR4 was recorded.
Shell percentage (SR%): The results in Table 2.23 show that the microsporidian
infection significantly reduced the shell percentage of the cross breeds studied. The
highest reduction in SR% was recorded in the batches inoculated with NIK-1So
(16.51 and 19.89% in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4 respectively) closely followed by
NIK-1Cpy (16.60 and 19.98% in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4 respectively), NIK-1Pr
(16.72 and 20.17% in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4 respectively), NIK-1Dp (16.77
and 20.31% in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4 respectively) which in turn was followed
by NIK-1Cc inoculated batches (16.86 and 20.50% in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4
respectively). In Nosema bombycis inoculated batches, the reduction in shell
percentage was comparatively more (16.39 and 18.89% in PM×CSR2 and
CSR2×CSR4 respectively) than that of the batches inoculated with the isolated
microsporidia. In the normal control batches, SR% of 17.72 and 22.21% was recorded
in PM×CSR2 and CSR2×CSR4 respectively. The percentage reduction in the SR% of
the cross breeds inoculated separately with the isolated microsporidia viz., NIK-1Pr,
NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So, NIK-1Dp and the standard strain N.bombycis
compared to that of the non inoculated control batches is graphically represented in
Figures 2.47 to 2.52.
DISCUSSION
Pebrine is deadliest disease of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. The most
common microsporidian routinely encountered to cause this disease is Nosema
bombycis (Sprague, 1982). However, there are many other microsporidia which are
encountered from time to time in silkworm. These microsporidia differ from the
standard strain, Nosema bombycis in many ways including pathogenicity. Studies on
Chapter 2
89
the characterization of microsporidia isolated from insect pests of mulberry and some
other agricultural crops infecting silkworm and presented in the preceding Chapter-1
revealed certain specific characteristics that make them different from other
microsporidia isolated from silkworm. The isolation and purification of spores,
confirmation of their infectivity as per Koch’s postulates, spore morphology,
arrangement of polar filament, number of coils of polar filament, serological affinity,
artificial germination and rate of sporulation at different temperatures were discussed.
In the present chapter, results of the detailed studies on mode of infection, site of
infection, pathogenicity, rate of spread of infection in a fixed size population of
silkworm and susceptibility of different productive breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx
mori L. to these microsporidia have been reported with comparison to corresponding
characters in batches infected with Nosema bombycis, the standard strain causing
pebrine disease of silkworm.
Several microsporidia naturally occurring in other lepidopteran pests are also
found to infect silkworm (Kishore et al., 1994; Sharma et al., 1989, 2003). Kramer
(1976) reported that microsporidia invade insects through three natural portals of
entry viz., oral, cuticular and ovarial. Entrance by the oral and cuticular portals results
in horizontal transmission and by the ovarial portal in vertical transmission. The oral
portal is the most common route through which the microsporidian gains access to
host tissues. In case of honey bees, the microsporidian, Nosema apis has been
reported to infect only through the oral portal (Bailey, 1963). In the present study
also, the isolated microsporidia were capable of infecting the silkworm, B. mori L.
through the oral portal. Feeding of mulberry leaf smeared with the isolated
microsporidia resulted in varying degrees of larval and pupal mortality and also
infection at moth stage. Infection was also recorded in the treatment wherein the egg
surface was contaminated with the isolated microsporidia. The development of
infection by the said treatment also took place through the oral portal only as the
neonates eat a portion of egg shell while hatching. Canning et al. (1985) also have
reported that though the embryo within an egg is not infected but the larvae
subsequently become infected when the microsporidian spores are ingested along with
the egg shell as the larvae eat their way through the egg shell. Thus, the infection is
similar to that of larvae feeding on the mulberry leaf contaminated with the
microsporidian spores. Significantly, the isolated microsporidia as well as N.
Chapter 2
90
bombycis were not capable of infecting silkworm through the cuticular portal. Though
the infection was recorded in the treatments wherein the microsporidian spores were
smeared on the larval integument but not dusted with bed disinfectant (Vijetha), the
cause of infection appears to be secondary contamination. After 24 hours of treatment,
when the first feeding was provided, the treated larvae came in contact with the
mulberry leaf thereby contaminating the leaf with the microsporidian spores. As the
larvae fed on the contaminated leaf, the microsporidian infection developed. Thus, the
mode of infection in this treatment also was per oral only rather than cuticular. The
said results were confirmed by observing the treatments wherein the isolated
microsporidia were smeared on the larval integument followed by Vijetha dusting
after 24 hours of treatment. Microscopic examination of larvae, pupae, moths, dead
eggs and progeny larvae from the said treatment did not show the microsporidian
infection confirming that the isolated microsporidia are not capable of infecting
silkworm through the cuticular portal. As per Brooks (1973), the entry via the
cuticular portal involves the inoculation of the microsporidian by the ovipositor of a
parasitoid and only the lepidopteran hosts that have hymenopteran parasitoids are
invaded through cuticular portal. All the isolated microsporidia except NIK-1Cc were
capable of infecting silkworm through ovarial portal also. The progenies from NIK-
1Pr, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So and NIK-1Dp infected female moths were also infected.
However, the progenies from NIK-1Cc infected female moths were not infected
indicating that the said microsporidian does not infect silkworm through the ovarial
portal. Tanada and Kaya (1993) also reported that infection through ovarial portal is
commonly observed in lepidopteran and mosquito hosts and the microsporidian is
incorporated into the egg or embryo within the female’s reproductive tract and the
progeny from such infected females is also infected.
Lepidopteran pests of mulberry (sole food plant of silkworm, Bombyx mori L)
and other agricultural crops constitute a constant source of microsporidian infection in
silkworm. In light of the above, it is essential to understand the nature of infection,
target tissues and pathogenicity of microsporidia isolated from lepidopteran insect
pests in silkworm. Hence, in the present study, five different microsporidia were
studied for the intensity of infection in different target tissues of silkworm. Nosema
bombycis has been reported as occurring in nearly all tissues of all stages of the
silkworm. The fat tissue of the silkworm appears to be particularly involved.
Chapter 2
91
Furthermore, the cells of the silk glands and of the malpighian tubules are frequently
as much affected as are those of the fat body (Steinhaus, 1949). These three tissues
appear to be more susceptible to parasitization by N. bombycis than do the epithelial
cells of the gut, the blood and pericardial cells. The tissues comprising the muscular
and the nervous systems are also readily attacked. The muscular tissue of the infected
silkworm becomes liquefied and microscopic observation reveals to consist of a
homogenous pasty mass, in which are suspended the remaining muscle fibers and
nuclei (Stempell, 1909). Several authors have reported that the microsporidian spore
formation occurs in mid gut epithelium, malpighian tubules, silk gland, fat bodies,
adipose tissue, gonads and trachea (Fujiwara, 1980,1985; Kawarabata, 2003; Shabir
Ahmad Bhat and Nataraju, 2007a). Infection in all the tissues of the silkworm larvae
due to the microsporidia viz., NIK-1s and NIK-2r has been reported. The
microsporidian NIK-3h has been reported to infect all the tissues except the midgut
tissue whereas infection by yet another microsporidian strain NIK-4m has not been
observed in any of the tissues other than the cysts originated from the gut basement
membrane (Ananthalakshmi and Fujiwara, 1993). Observations as recorded in present
study also clearly indicate that spore formation takes place in the midgut, fat bodies,
malpighian tubules, trachea, silk gland, gonads and haemolymph. The highest spore
yield was found in midgut followed by fat bodies and comparatively low infection in
other tissues by all the microsporidia indicating clear difference in the preference of
tissues for multiplication and sporulation by the microsporidia. Sasidharan et al.
(1994) reported that the rate of sporulation of Nosema bombycis increased with age of
silkworm pupa and moth and the cephalothoracic region recorded highest spore
concentration especially around the wing and wing muscles among all the tissues
tested. Multiplication and spore yield of microsporidia in various host systems have
also been studied by Lai and Canning (1983). The microsporidia enter silkworm by
per os means and the process of infection initiates with the germination of spores in
the gut and later passes through the gut wall and invades various other tissues of the
host (Brooks, 1988). Pleistophora sp. form uninucleate environmental spores and
infect only mid gut epithelium (Fujiwara, 1984a) and Thelohania sp. form octospore
only in the larval muscle cells (Becnel and Andreadis, 1999). Based on the
observations recorded in the present study, it can also be said that time taken by
different microsporidia to infect different tissues in silkworm also varies greatly as the
Chapter 2
92
target tissues like midgut and fat bodies are infected first followed by other tissues
such as malpighian tubules, silk gland, gonads and trachea. In these late infected
tissues, the number of microsporidian spores is also comparatively low. Rate of
sporulation of five microsporidia in different tissues of silkworm was found to be low
when compared to that of the rate of sporulation of the standard strain, Nosema
bombycis.
Madana Mohanan et al. (2006) reported that difference in spore yield in
different tissues is a reflection of the host-parasite interaction and possibly difference
in the virulence of the microsporidia is an important factor which determines the
spore yield in different tissues. Results reported in the present study suggest that all
the tissues examined are the sites of multiplication of microsporidian spores but the
multiplication rate varies in different tissues. In an earlier study also, all the tissues of
the silkworm larvae were found to be infected with two microsporidia viz., NIK-1s
and NIK-2r (Ananthalakshmi and Fujiwara, 1993). Kellen and Lindegren (1974)
reported difference in virulence of Nosema heterosporum and Nosema plodia in the
larvae of Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Our results, therefore, are in
conformity with these studies and suggest that different microsporidia studied in
present investigation infect different tissues of silkworm such as gut, fat body,
malpighian tubules, tracheal tissues, silk gland, gonads and haemolymph with varying
degree of intensity. Gonadal infection with Nosema spp. has an important bearing on
the vertical transmission of the parasite. This aspect is important in sericulture
industry since silkworm eggs distributed to farmers are required to be microsporidian
free (Nageswara Rao et al., 2004). Interestingly, in the present study, one
microsporidian, NIK-1Cc did not show any infection in gonads even up to the end of
the observation period confirming our findings with regard to the mode of infection of
the said microsporidian through ovarial portal where this microsporidian has not
shown any transmission from infected moth to the eggs in the silkworm. This finding
can be considered significant as transovarial transmission poses a serious threat to
sericulture industry as a whole.
The observations on the mortality in silkworm due to the infection by different
microsporidia under inoculated condition reveals that all the five isolated
microsporidia exhibit low pathogenicity in silkworm compared to N.bombycis.
Kishore et al. (1994) reported that two microsporidia viz., MCcrB1 and MCpyB1
Chapter 2
93
isolated from the butterflies, Catopsilia crocale and Catopsilia pyranthe respectively
do not cause any mortality in silkworm but a significant level of infection has been
observed at moth stage. However, in our study, two microsporidia viz., NIK-1Cc and
NIK-1Cpy isolated from the same butterflies caused varying degree of mortality at
larval and pupal stages depicting that the isolated microsporidia are different from
those reported by Kishore et al. (1994). An increase in percent mortality at larval
stage and a decrease in percent adult eclosion was observed with an increase in spore
concentration of each microsporidian. The results were, therefore, found to be in
conformity with an earlier study reported by Choi et al. (2002) wherein a
microsporidian isolated from cabbage white butterfly inoculated to second instar
Pieris larvae at a dosage of 1×108 spores/ml resulted in death of all larvae prior to
adult eclosion, at a lower spore dosage of 1×107 spores/ml, a few adults successfully
emerged. At 1×104 spores/ml, many individuals survived to adulthood and only a few
of these adults were infected. The isolated microsporidian was virulent and caused
chronic disease at low concentration, whereas it was highly virulent and produced
acute disease at high concentration (Choi et al., 2002). As has been reported in the
result section of the chapter, the LC50 values of the isolated microsporidia for the
larvae of CSR2 breed of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. are 1×108.1, 1×107.5 and
1×106.6 spores/ml (NIK-1Pr); 1×1014.6, 1×109.5 and 1×107.5 spores/ml (NIK-1Cc);
1×107.5, 1×106.7 and 1×105.9 spores/ml (NIK-1Cpy), 1×107.2, 1×106.1 and 1×105.4
spores/ml (NIK-1So) and 1×1011.6, 1×108.9 and 1×107.2 spores/ml (NIK-1Dp) for 12,
15 and 21 days PI respectively. On the other hand, the LC50 values of Nosema
bombycis are significantly low (1×106.9, 1×105.6 and 1×105.3 spores/ml for 12, 15 and
21 days PI respectively). The LC50 values, therefore, clearly suggest that all the five
isolated microsporidia are less pathogenic to silkworm compared to the standard
strain Nosema bombycis.
The spread of microsporidiosis within a healthy colony of silkworm after
introduction of specific number of carrier larvae takes place by way of horizontal
transmission i.e., the transmission of the pathogen from one individual to another of
the same generation in a population (Steinhaus and Martignoni, 1970). Microsporidia
are horizontally transmitted when a susceptible host ingests spores that are released
into the environment along with the faeces of infected individuals or via decomposed
cadavers (Becnel and Andreadis, 1999). Spores of enterogastric microsporidia are
Chapter 2
94
released in the faeces of the host insect throughout the larval stage (Weiser, 1961) and
are also found in the meconium of newly eclosed adults that survive larval infection
(Inglis et al., 2003). Vavra et al. (2006) reported that when microsporidian infection is
primarily restricted to the insect fat body, release of the spores via decomposing
cadavers may be the most important means of transmission. Several of the Nosema
isolates infect the silk glands of the host and have been shown to infect susceptible
larvae via spores isolated from faeces. Jeffords et al. (1987) suggested that spore-
containing silk is an important horizontal transmission route for the microsporidian
Nosema portugal infecting Lymantria dispar but not in other insects.
In an earlier study, the rate of spread of pebrine after introduction of
transovarially infected worms into healthy colony of silkworm has been investigated
(Baig et al., 1988) and the study reveals that after introducing 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15
larvae transovarially infected with pebrine in colonies of 200 healthy larvae each,
there was no mortality at larval stage. However, at moth stage, pebrine infection was
recorded which increased proportionately with an increase in the number of infected
larvae introduced. In a recent study also, a microsporidian isolated from a north-
eastern silkworm breed (Lamerin) has been found to spread infection in a healthy
silkworm colony but at a low rate. After introducing 1, 3, 6 and 9 carrier larvae
infected with lamerin microsporidian into healthy colonies containing 99, 97, 94 and
91 larvae respectively, there was no mortality at larval and pupal stages in three
silkworm breeds tested viz., Lamerin, Pure Mysore and CSR2. However,
microsporidian infection was recorded at moth stage and the extent of infection was in
proportion to the number of infected carrier larvae introduced thus depicting the
spread of infection through secondary contamination (Shabir Ahmad Bhat, 2006).
The results of the present investigation also establish the spread of the disease
through secondary contamination. In the present study, the infected carriers after their
introduction into healthy colony of silkworm larvae resulted in lower level of larval
and pupal mortality, however, significant infection was recorded at moth stage,
thereby spreading the microsporidiosis among the healthy silkworm of the fixed size
colony. The extent of spread was in proportion to the number of infected larvae
introduced. The maximum spread of microsporidiosis of 35.0, 25.0, 50.3, 45.7, 27.3
and 74.0% was recorded when 7 carrier larvae infected separately with NIK-1Pr,
NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So, NIK-1Dp and Nosema bombycis respectively were
Chapter 2
95
introduced into healthy colonies of silkworm larvae. Ishihara and Fujiwara (1965)
and Baig et al. (1988) reported that the change of epizootic pattern corresponds to the
change in number of larvae excreting the spores. In the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.,
common sources of pathogens for infection and spread of diseases are the
contaminated rearing trays and seat papers (Ishikawa and Miyajima, 1964; Miyajima,
1979a; Baig et al., 1990) which are used for the rearing of domesticated silkworm.
The pathogens are extruded by infected silkworms through gut juice, faecal matter
and decomposed dead body contaminating rearing trays and fresh mulberry leaves
provided to silkworm as feed, leading to the spread of the disease in healthy larvae by
secondary contamination. The study also reveals that the five different microsporidia
isolated from insect pests of mulberry and other agricultural crops show different rate
of spread in a healthy colony of silkworm that depends on their pathogenicity and
virulence.
The studies on the susceptibility of different silkworm breeds to the isolated
microsporidia revealed that there was a distinct variation among the multivoltine,
bivoltine and cross breeds in their susceptibility to the isolated microsporidia and their
effect on larval and cocoon characters. In inoculated batches, both the larval weight
and larval duration were affected. The larval weight got reduced and the larval
duration got prolonged in inoculated batches compared to the control batches. This
variation due to microsporidian infection is attributed to the multiplication of
pathogen in the host tissues, deprivation of nutrients to host growth and mechanical
disruption of tissues (Jolly, 1986). Cocoon characters were also adversely affected
due to microsporidian infection in all the ten breeds screened. Similar results have
been reported in an earlier study by Baig (1994) where a significant alteration in
larval weight and larval duration of thirty silkworm races (pure/hybrids) was
recorded. The larval weight got reduced, larval duration got prolonged and the cocoon
characters viz., single cocoon weight, single shell weight and shell ratio were reported
to be significantly inferior to cocoons obtained from healthy silkworms. Kudo (1931)
reported that heavily infected larvae of Bombyx mori do not spin cocoons and die,
whereas mild infection allows the larvae to spin cocoons. As the larval weight
decreases due to progressive pebrine infection, the cocoon is rendered inferior
(Naomani et al., 1971, Patil and Geethabai, 1989). Due to increase in time duration
from the day of inoculation to spinning, the silk gland also gets infected (Naomani et
al., 1971, Patil and Geethabai, 1989) and due to its impaired function, the cocoon
characters viz., single cocoon weight, single shell weight and silk ratio are adversely
Chapter 2
96
affected when compared to the cocoons obtained from control batches. Jameson
(1922) and Ghosh (1944) have also reported that pebrine infected silkworms spin poor
quality and flimsy cocoons. The silk from the cocoons of pebrine-infected larvae is
inferior in strength and uniformity of thickness to that of healthy larvae (Steinhaus,
1949).
In the present study, the mortality percentage due to infection by the isolated
microsporidia during larval stages was comparatively higher than the pupal stage. In
the moth stage, the percent infection was significantly higher than that of larval and
pupal stages, which is probably due to longer time available to the pathogen for its
multiplication in the host. The results are in conformity with earlier studies (Baig,
1994; Shabir Ahmad Bhat, 2006) wherein similar observations have been recorded.
According to Tanada (1976), the susceptibility of insects to microsporidia may vary
with different larval instars and occasionally with the different stages viz., larval,
pupal and adult stage. Multivoltine races have been reported to be more tolerant to
pebrine than bivoltines (Devaiah, 1973; Patil and Geethabai, 1989). Resistance to
pebrine is comparatively greater in Chinese races, followed by Japanese and European
races (Govindan et al., 1998; Singh and Saratchandra, 2003; Nataraju et al., 2005).
Among them, polyvoltine breeds were relatively resistant followed by bivoltines,
while the univoltines show poor resistance (Lu Yup-Lian, 1991). In the present study
also, similar results were observed. Multivoltines exhibited lower levels of
microsporidian infection in comparison to bivoltine breeds. The percent larval
mortality in the treated multivoltine breeds viz., Pure Mysore, Nistari, ND7 and NP1
ranged from 12.3 to 21.3%, 11.3 to 18.3%, 17.7 to 27.0%, 19.7 to 28.7%, 12.0 to
20.7% and 40.7 to 54.3% compared to the percent larval mortality in Bivoltine breeds
(CSR2, CSR4, CSR18 and CSR19) where it ranged from 35.3 to 49.3%, 20.7 to
33.3%, 42.3 to 57.3%, 45.7 to 60.0%, 21.3 to 34.3% and 85.3 to 95.3% respectively in
NIK-1Pr, NIK-1Cc, NIK-1Cpy, NIK-1So, NIK-1Dp and Nosema bombycis inoculated
batches. The highest infection level in more susceptible races such as bivoltines may
be attributed to larger body size, higher consumption of mulberry leaf and slower
regeneration of tissues compared to the less susceptible races like multivoltines
(Weiser, 1963). Among the cross breeds, PM×CSR2 was found to be less susceptible
to microsporidian infection compared to CSR2×CSR4. Various reasons have been
attributed to this difference in susceptibility/resistance of insects to microsporidian
disease. Weiser (1969) attributed three factors for this difference in
susceptibility/resistance:
Chapter 2
97
1. Failure of spores to germinate in the digestive tract because of pH, enzymes and
inadequate digestion of the seal covering the polar filament.
2. Non-susceptibility of host tissues and
3. Host resistance to infection by actively destroying the microsporidian during its
migration to susceptible tissues or by elimination of infected cells by the host.
Resistance to microsporidiosis has been found to vary based on the portal of
entry of the pathogen also. In some cases, an insect species that is resistant through
oral inoculation may become susceptible when the microsporidian is inoculated into
the haemocoel (Fisher and Sanborn, 1962; Undeen and Maddox, 1973). In this case,
the midgut is an effective barrier to the microsporidian.
It is, therefore, concluded that the five microsporidia isolated from insect pests
of mulberry and other agricultural crops infect silkworm through oral and ovarial
portals (except the microsporidian NIK-1Cc which does not infect silkworm through
the ovarial portal) and not through the cuticular portal. However, the percentage of
infection in larvae, pupae, moths, dead eggs and progeny larvae due to the isolated
microsporidia is low compared to that observed due to the standard strain, N.
bombycis. The isolated microsporidia also infect different tissues of silkworm but the
intensity of infection in different tissues by the isolated microsporidia is low when
compared to the intensity of infection in those tissues due to N. bombycis. The
isolated microsporidia are low in pathogenicity and show a lower rate of spread
within a healthy colony of silkworm when compared with the standard strain Nosema
bombycis. Also, different productive breeds of silkworm show a less susceptibility to
infection by the isolated microsporidia when compared to their susceptibility to
infection by Nosema bombycis.
98
Table 2.1: Mode of infection of NIK-1Pr in silkworm
Mortality (%) Treatment
Larva Pupa Infected moths
(%) Fecundity
(No.) Hatching %
Dead eggs infected (%)
Progeny larvae infected (%)
Leaf contamination (T1) 42.0
(40.4)±2.0 9.7
(18.1)±1.2 44.7
(41.9)±1.5 384.0±2.1 80.3±1.0
86.9 (68.7)±1.6
97.4 (80.7)±0.9
Egg surface contamination (T2) 54.3
(47.4)±1.5 20.0
(26.5)±1.0 67.0
(54.9)±2.0 354.0±2.5 74.3±1.0
90.1 (71.6)±0.9
98.5 (82.9)±0.3
Body surface contamination followed by vijetha dusting (T3)
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
498.0 ± 4.0 95.5 ± 0.8 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0(0.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination without vijetha dusting(T4)
30.7(33.6) ± 2.1
8.3(16.7) ± 0.6 40.0(39.2) ±
2.0 413.0 ± 5.7 84.5 ± 1.1
83.9 (66.3)±1.5
91.6 (73.1)±1.6
Control (T5) 0.0 (0.0)
± 0.0 0.0 (0.0)
± 0.0 0.0 (0.0)
± 0.0 505.0 2.0 97.0±0.4
0.0 (0.0)±0.0
0.0 (0.0)±0.0
CD at 5 % (1.6) (1.2) (1.6) 2.6 5.5 (1.6) (1.9)
Values are mean ± SD and the values in parenthesis are angular transformed.
99
Table 2.2: Mode of infection of NIK-1Cc in silkworm
Mortality (%) Treatment
Larva Pupa
Infected moths (%)
Fecundity (No.)
Hatching % Dead eggs
infected (%) Progeny larvae infected (%)
Leaf contamination (T1) 32.0
(34.4) ± 2.0 7.7
(16.1) ± 0.6 29.3
(32.7) ±1.2 417.0 ± 5.3 85.8 ± 0.6
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
Egg surface contamination (T2) 39.7
(39.0) ± 2.1 18.0
(25.1) ± 1.0 38.0
(38.0) ± 2.0 406.0 ± 3.0 81.4 ± 0.8
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination followed by vijetha dusting (T3)
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
499.0 ± 1.5 96.4 ± 0.7 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination without vijetha dusting(T4)
21.3 (27.4) ± 1.5
7.0 (15.3) ± 1.0
23.7 (29.1) ± 1.5
429.0 ± 2.0 88.3 ± 0.4 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0
Control (T5) 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 509.0 ± 2.0 97.4 ± 0.5
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
CD at 5 % (1.6) (1.2) (1.4) 5.6 1.1 -- --
Values are mean ± SD and the values in parenthesis are angular transformed.
100
Table 2.3: Mode of infection of NIK-1Cpy in silkworm
Mortality (%) Treatment
Larva Pupa
Infected moths (%)
Fecundity (No.)
Hatching % Dead eggs
infected (%) Progeny larvae infected (%)
Leaf contamination (T1) 70.0
(56.7) ± 2.0 10.7
(19.0) ± 0.6 100.0
(90.0) ± 0.0 362.0 ± 2.0 77.5 ± 0.5
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
Egg surface contamination (T2) 76.0
(60.6) ± 1.0 13.3
(21.3) ± 0.6 100.0
(90.0) ± 0.0 343.0 ± 2.0 72.7 ± 0.7
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination followed by vijetha dusting (T3)
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
498.0 ± 2.1 95.3 ± 1.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination without vijetha dusting(T4)
41.7 (40.2) ± 1.5
9.3 (17.7) ± 0.6
91.3 (72.8) ± 1.5
388.0 ± 3.1 80.9 ± 0.3 90.3
(71.8) ± 0.6 94.
(75.8) ± 1.0
Control (T5) 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 504.0 ± 1.5 97.0 ± 0.2
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
CD at 5 % (1.3) (0.8) (1.3) 4.0 1.1 (0.45) (0.9)
Values are mean ± SD and the values in parenthesis are angular transformed.
101
Table 2.4: Mode of infection of NIK-1So in silkworm
Mortality (%) Treatment
Larva Pupa
Infected moths (%)
Fecundity (No.)
Hatching % Dead eggs
infected (%) Progeny larvae infected (%)
Leaf contamination (T1) 85.7
(67.7) ± 0.6 11.3
(19.6) ± 0.6 100.0
(90.0) ± 0.0 359.0 ± 2.1 76.5 ± 0.5
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
Egg surface contamination (T2) 90.3
(71.8) ± 0.6 3.7
(11.0) ± 0.6 100.0
(90.0) ± 0.0 340.0 ± 2.0 71.6 ± 0.5
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination followed by vijetha dusting (T3)
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
498.0 ± 2.0 95.7 ± 0.6 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination without vijetha dusting(T4)
45.7 (42.5) ± 1.2
10.7 (19.0) ± 0.6
95.0 (77.0) ± 1.0
385.0 ± 2.6 79.5 ± 0.6 94.
(75.8) ± 1.0 96.3
(78.9) ± 0.1
Control (T5) 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 503.0 ± 1.5 97.0 ± 0.2
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
CD at 5 % (0.8) (0.9) (1.1) 3.8 0.9 (0.9) (0.2)
Values are mean ± SD and the values in parenthesis are angular transformed.
102
Table 2.5: Mode of infection of NIK-1Dp in silkworm
Mortality (%) Treatment
Larva Pupa
Infected moths (%)
Fecundity (No.) Hatching % Dead eggs
infected (%) Progeny larvae infected (%)
Leaf contamination (T1) 33.0
(35.0) ± 1.0 8.3
(16.7) ± 0.6 32.7
(34.8) ± 0.6 407.0 ± 5.3 84.0 ± 0.4 85.3
(67.4) ± 1.0 84.1
(66.5) ± 0.7
Egg surface contamination (T2) 44.7
(41.9) ± 1.5 18.7
(25.6) ± 0.6 40.7
(39.6) ± 3.2 395.0 ± 2.0 79.7 ± 0.4 88.0
(69.7) ± 0.6 86.5
(68.4) ± 0.2 Body surface contamination followed by vijetha dusting (T3)
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
499.0 ± 0.6 96.3 ± 0.9 0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination without vijetha dusting(T4)
24.0 (29.3) ± 2.0
8.0 (16.4) ± 1.0
28.0 (31.9) ± 1.0
420.0 ± 3.1 86.0 ± 0.6 81.8 (64.7) ± 1.5
78.5 (62.3) ± 1.4
Control (T5) 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 509.0 ± 1.0 97.4 ± 0.4 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0
CD at 5 % (1.4) (1.1) (1.5) 5.3 1.1 (1.2) (0.9)
Values are mean ± SD and the values in parenthesis are angular transformed.
103
Table 2.6: Mode of infection of N. bombycis in silkworm
Mortality (%) Treatment
Larva Pupa
Infected moths (%)
Fecundity (No.) Hatching % Dead eggs
infected (%) Progeny larvae infected (%)
Leaf contamination (T1) 100.0
(90.0) ± 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
Egg surface contamination (T2) 100.0
(90.0) ± 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --
Body surface contamination followed by vijetha dusting (T3)
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
499.0 ± 2.0 95.7 ± 0.4 0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
0.0 (0.0) ± 0.0
Body surface contamination without vijetha dusting(T4)
52.0 (46.1) ± 2.0
17.0 (24.3) ± 1.0
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
360.0 ± 2.0 72.1 ± 0.4 100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
100.0 (90.0) ± 0.0
Control (T5) 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 501.0 ± 1.5 97.0 ± 0.4 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0 0.0
(0.0) ± 0.0
CD at 5 % (0.93) (0.62) -- 2.6 0.6 -- --
Values are mean ± SD and the values in parenthesis are angular transformed.
104
Table 2.7: Site and intensity of infection in the host by the microsporidian NIK-1Pr
Site and intensity of infection (days post inoculation) Microsporidian isolate Host tissues
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Midgut - - + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Fat bodies - - - + + ++ ++ ++
Malpighian tubules - - - - - + + ++
Trachea - - - - - + + +
Silk gland - - - - - - + +
Gonads - - - - - - + +
NIK-1Pr
Haemolymph - - - - - + + + - No infection; + Low (0.25 to 7.5×106spores/mg tissue); ++: High infection (7.75 to 15×106spores/mg tissue); for haemolymph the same is expressed as spores/ml.
Table 2.8: Site and intensity of infection in the host by the microsporidian NIK-1Cc
Site and intensity of infection (days post inoculation) Microsporidian isolate
Host tissues 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Midgut - - - - + + ++ ++
Fat bodies - - - - - + + ++
Malpighian tubules - - - - - - + +
Trachea - - - - - - + +
Silk gland - - - - - - - +
Gonads - - - - - - - -
NIK-1Cc
Haemolymph - - - - - - + + - No infection; + Low (0.25 to 7.5×106spores/mg tissue); ++: High infection (7.75 to 15×106spores/mg tissue); for haemolymph the same is expressed as spores/ml.
105
Table 2.9: Site and intensity of infection in the host by the microsporidian NIK-1Cpy
Site and intensity of infection (days post inoculation) Microsporidian isolate
Host tissues 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Midgut - + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Fat bodies - - + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++
Malpighian tubules - - - + + + ++ ++
Trachea - - - + + + + ++
Silk gland - - - + + + + +
Gonads - - - - + + + +
NIK-1Cpy
Haemolymph - - - - + + + +
- No infection; + Low (0.25 to 7.5×106spores/mg tissue); ++: High infection (7.75 to 15×106spores/mg tissue); for haemolymph the same is expressed as spores/ml.
Table 2.10: Site and intensity of infection in the host by the microsporidian NIK- 1So
Site and intensity of infection (days post inoculation) Microsporidian isolate
Host tissues 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Midgut - - + + ++ ++ ++ ++
Fat bodies - - - + + + ++ ++
Malpighian tubules - - - + + + + ++
Trachea - - - + + + + +
Silk gland - - - + + + + +
Gonads - - - + + + + +
NIK-1So
Haemolymph - - - - + + + +
- No infection; + Low (0.25 to 7.5×106spores/mg tissue); ++: High infection (7.75 to 15×106spores/mg tissue); for haemolymph the same is expressed as spores/ml.
106
Table 2.11: Site and intensity of infection in the host by the microsporidian NIK- 1Dp
Site and intensity of infection (days post inoculation) Microsporidian isolate
Host tissues 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Midgut - - - + + + ++ ++
Fat bodies - - - - + + ++ ++
Malpighian tubules - - - - - + + ++
Trachea - - - - + + + +
Silk gland - - - - - + + +
Gonads - - - - - - + +
NIK-1Dp
Haemolymph - - - - - - + +
- No infection; + Low (0.25 to 7.5×106spores/mg tissue); ++: High infection (7.75 to 15×106spores/mg tissue); for haemolymph the same is expressed as spores/ml. Table 2.12: Site and intensity of infection in the host by Nosema bombycis
Site and intensity of infection (days post inoculation) Microsporidian
isolate Host tissues
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Midgut + ++ ++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
Fat bodies + + ++ ++ +++ +++ +++ +++
Malpighian tubules + + ++ ++ ++ +++ +++ +++
Trachea - + + ++ ++ +++ +++ +++
Silk gland - + + ++ ++ +++ +++ +++
Gonads - + + ++ ++ ++ +++ +++
Nosema bombycis
Haemolymph - + + + ++ ++ ++ +++
- No infection; + Low (0.25 to 7.5×106spores/mg tissue); ++: High infection (7.75 to 15×106spores/mg tissue); for haemolymph the same is expressed as spores/ml.
107
Table 2.13: Comparative pathogenicity of the isolated microsporidia and Nosema bombycis to the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.
Mortality due to
microsporidiosis (%) Microsporidian isolate
Spores/ml Larva Pupa
Moths emerged
(%)
Moths infected
(%)
Total infection %
1 × 103 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 29.7(33.0) 29.7(33.0) 1 × 104 1.0(5.7) 1.7(7.5) 97.3(80.5) 33.3(35.2) 36.0(36.8) 1 × 105 7.3(15.6) 3.7(11.1) 89.0(70.6) 34.0(35.6) 45.0(42.1) 1 × 106 26.3(30.8) 9.0(17.4) 64.7(53.5) 28.3(32.1) 63.7(52.9) 1 × 107 43.0(40.9) 12.0(20.2) 45.0(42.1) 21.0(27.2) 76.0(60.6)
NIK-1Pr
1 × 108 66.0(54.3) 20.3(26.7) 13.7(21.7) 12.7(20.8) 99.0(84.2) 1 × 103 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 14.3(22.2) 14.3(22.2) 1 × 104 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 18.3(25.3) 18.3(25.3) 1 × 105 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 21.3(27.5) 21.3(27.5) 1 × 106 19.7(26.3) 9.0(17.4) 71.3(57.6) 17.7(24.8) 46.3(42.8) 1 × 107 32.3(34.6) 11.0(19.3) 56.7(48.8) 17.0(24.3) 60.3(50.9)
NIK-1Cc
1 × 108 42.3(40.5) 14.0(21.9) 43.7(41.3) 15.3(23.0) 71.7(57.8) 1 × 103 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 31.7(34.2) 31.7(34.2) 1 × 104 6.7(15.0) 3.7(11.1) 89.7(71.2) 36.0(36.8) 46.3(42.8) 1 × 105 16.3(23.8) 4.3(11.9) 79.3(62.9) 59.7(50.6) 80.3(63.6) 1 × 106 39.7(39.1) 7.3(15.6) 53.0(46.7) 49.3(44.6) 96.3(78.9) 1 × 107 70.0(56.8) 9.7(18.1) 20.3(26.7) 20.3(26.7) 100.0(90.0)
NIK-1Cpy
1 × 108 81.7(64.6) 12.0(20.2) 6.3(14.5) 6.3(14.5) 100.0(90.0) 1 × 103 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 36.3(37.0) 36.3(37.0) 1 × 104 9.7(18.1) 4.7(12.5) 85.7(67.7) 32.0(34.4) 46.3(42.8) 1 × 105 21.0(27.2) 5.7(13.8) 73.3(58.8) 59.3(50.3) 86.0(68.0) 1 × 106 43.0(40.9) 9.7(18.1) 47.3(43.4) 46.3(42.8) 99.0(84.2) 1 × 107 85.7(67.7) 10.3(18.7) 4.0(11.5) 4.0(11.5) 100.0(90.0)
NIK-1So
1 × 108 97.0(80.0) 3.0(9.9) -- -- 100.0(90.0) 1 × 103 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 17.7(24.8) 17.7(24.8) 1 × 104 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 100.0(90.0) 21.3(27.5) 21.3(27.5) 1 × 105 0.0(0.0) 1.7(7.5) 98.3(82.5) 25.0(30.0) 26.7(31.1) 1 × 106 22.7(28.4) 11.7(20.0) 65.7(54.1) 18.7(25.6) 53.0(46.7) 1 × 107 33.7(35.5) 14.0(21.9) 52.3(46.3) 17.3(24.5) 65.0(53.7)
NIK-1Dp
1 × 108 45.7(42.5) 17.3(24.5) 37.0(37.4) 14.3(22.2) 77.3(61.5) 1 × 103 3.7(11.1) 8.3(16.7) 88.0(69.7) 75.3(60.2) 87.3(69.1) 1 × 104 10.7(19.1) 10.3(18.7) 79.0(62.7) 68.7(55.9) 89.7(71.2) 1 × 105 21.7(27.7) 14.7(22.5) 63.7(52.9) 56.0(48.4) 92.3(73.9) 1 × 106 50.0(45.0) 18.0(25.1) 32.0(34.4) 32.0(34.4) 100.0(90.0) 1 × 107 100.0(90.0) -- -- -- 100.0(90.0)
Nosema bombycis
1 × 108 100.0(90.0) -- -- -- 100.0(90.0) A CD at 5% (0.6) (0.8) (0.7) (0.7) (0.5) B CD at 5% (0.6) (0.8) (0.7) (0.7) (0.5)
S.E. 0.51 0.70 0.63 0.60 0.44 Ax B
CD at 5% (1.4) (1.9) (1.8) (1.7) (1.2) Values in parenthesis are angular transformed
108
Table 2.14: LC50 and Fiducial limits of the isolated microsporidia and Nosema bombycis to the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. (12 days PI)
Treatment X mean Y mean Probit Equation Chi square S.E-b Fiducial limit LC50
NIK-1Pr 7.2297 4.2784 Y=-1.65+0.82X 3.369NS 0.1954 107.817-108.403 1×108.1
NIK-1Cc 6.2003 3.4014 Y= 2.22+0.19X 7.250NS 0.1108 109.621-1019.607 1×1014.6
NIK-1Cpy 6.6950 4.4338 Y= 0.22+0.63X 1.719NS 0.1166 107.317-107.870 1×107.5
NIK-1So 6.5788 4.5545 Y= 0.30+0.65X 4.308NS 0.1100 107.028-107.506 1×107.2
NIK-1Dp 6.3902 3.6017 Y= 1.91+0.27X 7.291NS 0.1081 109.430-1013.903 1×1011.6
N. bombycis 5.8336 4.2657 Y= 0.54+0.64X 1.722NS 0.0687 106.759-107.206 1×106.9 PI: Post inoculation; NS: Non-significant.
Table 2.15: LC50 and Fiducial limits of the isolated microsporidia and Nosema bombycis to the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. (15 days PI)
Treatment X mean Y mean Probit Equation Chi square S.E-b Fiducial limit LC50
NIK-1Pr 6.7540 4.4824 Y=-0.04+0.67X 2.602NS 0.1227 107.275-107.781 1×107.5
NIK-1Cc 6.1868 4.0375 Y=2.24+0.29X 9.423NS 0.0834 108.459-1010.553 1×109.5
NIK-1Cpy 6.3482 4.7562 Y=0.71+0.63X 3.793NS 0.0911 106.529-106.932 1×106.7
NIK-1So 6.0098 4.8790 Y=0.58+0.72X 7.819NS 0.0976 105.998-106.359 1×106.1
NIK-1Dp 6.2184 4.1226 Y=2.10+0.33X 2.104NS 0.0830 108.125-109.711 1×108.9
N. bombycis 5.6593 4.9740 Y=0.36+0.82X 6.401NS 0.1068 105.526-105.856 1×105.6
PI: Post inoculation; NS: Non-significant.
109
Table 2.16: LC50 and Fiducial limits of the isolated microsporidia and Nosema bombycis to the silkworm, Bombyx mori L. (21 days PI)
Treatment X mean Y mean Probit Equation Chi square S.E-b Fiducial limit LC50
NIK-1Pr 6.3301 4.7803 Y=-0.09+0.74X 2.600NS 0.1063 106.443-106.811 1×106.6
NIK-1Cc 6.0083 4.4530 Y=2.29+0.36X 8.728NS 0.0736 107.081-107.974 1×107.5
NIK-1Cpy 5.8194 4.9094 Y=0.70+0.72X 4.496NS 0.0953 105.767-106.122 1×105.9
NIK-1So 5.4504 4.9871 Y=2.80+0.92X 9.351NS 0.1178 105.312-105.616 1×105.4
NIK-1Dp 6.7380 4.6183 Y=-0.57+0.77X 8.716NS 0.1299 107.032-107.436 1×107.2
N. bombycis 5.4369 5.0390 Y=2.11+0.54X 4.452NS 0.0766 105.150-105.579 1×105.3
PI: Post inoculation; NS: Non-significant.
110
Table 2.17: Rate of spread of the microsporidian infection in a healthy colony of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L
Spread of infection Microsporidian
isolates No.of carrier larvae
introduced
Larval duration (D:H)
Larval weight (g) Dead Larvae (%)
Dead Pupae (%)
Moths infected (%)
Total spread (%)
1 24:00 33.4 1.0 (5.7) 1.0 (5.7) 19.7 (26.3) 21.7 (27.7) 3 24:00 34.1 3.0 (9.9) 1.0 (5.7) 21.7 (27.7) 25.7 (30.4) 5 24:00 33.9 5.7 (13.8) 2.3 (8.7) 22.3 (28.2) 30.3 (33.4)
NIK-1Pr
7 24:00 33.7 7.0 (15.3) 2.7 (9.4) 25.3 (30.2) 35.0 (36.2) 1 24:00 34.7 1.0 (5.7) 0.3 (3.1) 9.0 (17.4) 10.3 (18.7) 3 24:00 33.9 2.7 (9.4) 0.7 (4.8) 12.3 (20.5) 15.7 (23.3) 5 24:00 34.5 4.3 (11.9) 1.0 (5.7) 16.0 (23.6) 21.3 (27.5)
NIK-1Cc
7 24:00 34.5 5.7 (13.8) 1.7 (7.5) 17.7 (24.8) 25.0 (30.0) 1 24:00 33.4 3.7 (11.1) 0.7 (4.8) 30.7 (33.6) 35.0 (36.2) 3 24:00 34.6 5.7 (13.8) 1.7 (7.5) 33.0 (35.0) 40.3 (39.4) 5 24:00 34.8 7.0 (15.3) 3.0 (9.9) 35.7 (36.7) 45.7 (42.5)
NIK-1Cpy
7 24:00 33.8 9.0 (17.4) 3.7 (11.1) 37.7 (37.8) 50.3 (45.1) 1 24:00 34.3 3.3 (10.4) 0.7 (4.8) 23.0 (28.6) 27.0 (31.3) 3 24:00 34.5 4.7 (12.5) 1.3 (6.5) 25.7 (30.4) 31.7 (34.2) 5 24:00 34.4 6.3 (14.5) 2.7 (9.4) 29.7 (33.0) 38.7 (38.4)
NIK-1So
7 24:00 34.2 7.7 (16.1) 3.3 (10.4) 34.7 (36.1) 45.7 (42.5) 1 24:00 34.6 1.7 (7.5) 0.0 (0.0) 11.7 (20.0) 13.3 (21.4) 3 24:00 34.5 2.7 (9.4) 1.0 (5.7) 16.0 (23.6) 19.7 (26.3) 5 24:00 34.1 4.7 (12.5) 1.0 (5.7) 18.3 (25.3) 24.0 (29.3)
NIK-1Dp
7 24:00 34.2 7.0 (15.3) 1.0 (5.7) 19.3 (26.0) 27.3 (31.5) 1 24:12 33.8 4.3 (11.9) 2.7 (9.4) 40.0 (39.2) 47.0 (43.3) 3 24:12 34.3 6.7 (15.0) 3.7 (11.1) 43.0 (40.9) 53.3 (46.9) 5 24:12 34.1 7.7 (16.1) 4.7 (12.5) 45.0 (42.1) 57.3 (49.2)
Nosema bombycis
7 24:12 34.1 10.0(18.4) 5.0 (12.9) 59.0 (50.2) 74.0 (59.3) A CD at 5% -- -- (0.7) (0.8) (0.7) (0.8) B CD at 5% -- -- (0.6) (0.6) (0.5) (0.6)
S. E. ± -- 0.35 0.49 0.55 0.47 0.55 A × B
CD at 5% -- -- (1.4) (1.5) (1.3) (1.6) Values in parenthesis are angular transformed
111
Table 2.18: Mortality and infection level due to five different microsporidia in Multivoltine breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.
Mortality due to infection
(%) Microsporidian isolates
Silkworm breed
Larva Pupa
Moths infected (%)
Total Infection %
PM 12.3(20.5) 9.7(18.1) 34.7(36.1) 56.7(48.8) Nistari 15.3(23.0) 12.0(20.2) 33.3(35.2) 60.7(51.2) ND7 21.3(27.5) 18.0(25.1) 32.0(34.4) 71.3(57.6)
NIK-1Pr
NP1 18.3(25.3) 14.7(22.5) 32.3(34.6) 65.3(53.9) PM 11.3(19.6) 6.7(15.0) 22.7(28.4) 40.7(39.6)
Nistari 12.0(20.2) 8.7(17.1) 23.0(28.6) 43.7(41.3) ND7 18.3(25.3) 13.7(21.7) 24.7(29.8) 56.7(48.8)
NIK-1Cc
NP1 14.7(22.5) 10.3(18.7) 23.7(29.1) 48.7(44.2) PM 17.7(24.8) 7.7(16.1) 70.7(57.2) 96.0(78.4)
Nistari 20.3(26.7) 10.3(18.7) 67.3(55.1) 98.0(81.8) ND7 27.0(31.3) 17.0(24.3) 56.0(48.4) 100.0(90.0)
NIK-1Cpy
NP1 22.3(28.1) 13.0(21.1) 63.7(52.9) 99.0(84.2) PM 19.7(26.3) 8.7(17.1) 70.3(56.9) 98.7(83.4)
Nistari 22.3(28.1) 11.3(19.6) 66.3(54.5) 100.0(90.0) ND7 28.7(32.4) 18.7(25.6) 52.7(46.5) 100.0(90.0)
NIK-1So
NP1 25.3(30.2) 15.0(22.8) 59.7(50.6) 100.0(90.0) PM 12.0(20.2) 8.7(17.1) 22.3(28.1) 43.0(40.9)
Nistari 14.0(21.9) 9.7(18.1) 22.7(28.4) 46.4(42.9) ND7 20.7(27.0) 17.3(24.5) 22.3(28.1) 60.3(50.9)
NIK-1Dp
NP1 18.1(25.2) 13.3(21.4) 22.7(28.4) 54.2(47.4) PM 40.7(39.6) 11.3(19.6) 48.0(43.8) 100.0(90.0)
Nistari 48.0(43.8) 13.3(21.4) 38.7(38.4) 100.0(90.0) ND7 54.3(47.4) 21.7(27.7) 24.0(29.3) 100.0(90.0)
Nosema bombycis
NP1 50.3(45.1) 17.7(24.8) 32.0(34.4) 100.0(90.0) PM 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0)
Nistari 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) ND7 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0)
Normal control
NP1 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0)
A CD at 5% (0.9) (0.4) (0.4) (0.3)
B CD at 5% (0.6) (0.3) (0.3) (0.2)
S. E. ± 0.61 0.31 0.27 0.22 (A x B)
CD at 5% (1.7) (0.9) (0.7) (0.6) Values in parenthesis are angular transformed
112
Table 2.19: Effect of infection by the isolated microsporidia on larval and cocoon characters of Multivoltine breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.
Microsporidian isolates
Silkworm breed
Larval weight
(g)
Larval Duration (D: H)
Cocoon weight
(g)
Shell weight
(g) SR %
PM 19.30 28:00 0.760 0.103 13.54 Nistari 20.08 25:00 0.865 0.119 13.75 ND7 36.41 26:00 1.193 0.219 18.36
NIK-1Pr
NP1 33.83 25:00 1.194 0.210 17.55 PM 20.18 28:00 0.788 0.109 13.87
Nistari 21.31 25:00 0.875 0.122 13.97 ND7 37.48 26:00 1.197 0.222 18.57
NIK-1Cc
NP1 34.03 25:00 1.202 0.216 17.94 PM 18.96 28:00 0.752 0.101 13.38
Nistari 19.74 25:00 0.855 0.117 13.64 ND7 36.27 26:00 1.182 0.216 18.25
NIK-1Cpy
NP1 33.74 25:00 1.191 0.208 17.43 PM 18.72 28:00 0.750 0.100 13.32
Nistari 19.25 25:00 0.850 0.115 13.56 ND7 36.05 26:00 1.179 0.214 18.17
NIK-1So
NP1 33.71 25:00 1.184 0.206 17.39 PM 19.91 28:00 0.781 0.108 13.79
Nistari 20.58 25:00 0.870 0.121 13.91 ND7 36.95 26:00 1.184 0.219 18.46
NIK-1Dp
NP1 33.90 25:00 1.197 0.212 17.71 PM 16.18 29:00 0.730 0.085 11.64
Nistari 18.11 25:00 0.825 0.105 12.72 ND7 33.12 26:00 1.170 0.207 17.69
Nosema bombycis
NP1 31.49 25:00 1.173 0.193 16.45 PM 22.02 26:00 0.805 0.115 14.24
Nistari 24.41 23:00 0.911 0.133 14.64 ND7 38.92 25:00 1.220 0.246 20.13
Normal control
NP1 36.62 24:00 1.221 0.227 18.55
A CD at 5%
0.02 -- 0.002 0.001 0.04
B CD at 5%
0.02 -- 0.002 0.001 0.05
S. E. ± 0.02 -- 0.001 0.001 0.05 A×B CD at
5% 0.05 -- 0.004 0.002 0.13
113
Table 2.20: Mortality and infection level due to five different microsporidia in Bivoltine breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.
Mortality due to infection
(%) Microsporidian
isolates Silkworm
breed Larva Pupa
Moths infected (%)
Total infection %
CSR2 49.3(44.6) 14.3(22.2) 21.0(27.2) 84.7(66.9) CSR4 46.3(42.8) 11.7(20.0) 23.3(28.8) 81.3(64.3) CSR18 35.3(36.4) 6.3(14.5) 27.3(31.5) 69.0(56.1)
NIK- 1Pr
CSR19 37.3(37.6) 7.7(16.1) 27.3(31.5) 72.3(58.2) CSR2 33.3(35.2) 9.7(18.1) 20.3(26.7) 63.3(52.7) CSR4 30.3(33.4) 8.3(16.7) 20.7(27.0) 59.3(50.3) CSR18 20.7(27.0) 4.3(11.9) 20.7(27.0) 45.7(42.5)
NIK- 1Cc
CSR19 23.0(28.6) 5.3(13.3) 21.7(27.7) 50.0(45.0) CSR2 57.3(49.2) 13.0(21.1) 29.7(33.0) 100.0(90.0) CSR4 54.0(47.3) 10.7(19.1) 35.3(36.4) 100.0(90.0) CSR18 42.3(40.5) 7.0(15.3) 45.7(42.5) 95.0(77.0)
NIK- 1Cpy
CSR19 46.0(42.7) 8.3(16.7) 42.7(40.8) 97.0(80.0) CSR2 60.0(50.7) 10.3(18.7) 29.7(33.0) 100.0(90.0) CSR4 56.3(48.6) 9.7(18.1) 34.0(35.6) 100.0(90.0) CSR18 45.7(42.5) 8.0(16.4) 43.3(41.1) 97.0(80.0)
NIK- 1So
CSR19 48.7(44.2) 8.7(17.1) 40.0(39.2) 97.3(80.5) CSR2 34.3(35.8) 12.3(20.5) 21.0(27.2) 67.7(55.3) CSR4 31.0(33.8) 10.3(18.7) 21.3(27.5) 62.7(52.3) CSR18 21.3(27.5) 7.3(15.6) 22.3(28.1) 51.0(45.5)
NIK- 1Dp
CSR19 24.3(29.5) 8.7(17.1) 22.0(27.9) 55.0(47.8) CSR2 95.3(77.4) 1.7(7.5) 3.0(9.9) 100.0(90.0) CSR4 93.3(75.0) 2.0(8.1) 4.7(12.5) 100.0(90.0) CSR18 85.3(67.4) 3.3(10.4) 11.3(19.6) 100.0(90.0)
Nosema bombycis
CSR19 87.7(69.4) 2.7(9.4) 9.7(18.1) 100.0(90.0) CSR2 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) CSR4 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) CSR18 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0)
Normal control
CSR19 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) A CD at 5% (0.5) (0.5) (0.4) (0.3)
B CD at 5% (0.4) (0.4) (0.3) (0.3)
S. E. ± 0.33 0.34 0.30 0.25 (A x B)
CD at 5% (0.9) (0.9) (0.8) (0.7) Values in parenthesis are angular transformed
114
Table 2.21: Effect of infection by the isolated microsporidia on larval and cocoon characters of Bivoltine breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.
Microsporidian isolates
Silkworm breed
Larval weight
(g)
Larval Duration (D: H)
Cocoon weight
(g)
Shell weight
(g) SR %
CSR2 36.19 25:00 1.483 0.295 19.86 CSR4 35.23 24:00 1.537 0.300 19.52 CSR18 33.00 24:00 1.529 0.298 19.46
NIK-1Pr
CSR19 31.35 24:00 1.473 0.276 18.76 CSR2 37.85 25:00 1.489 0.300 20.14 CSR4 36.37 24:00 1.540 0.309 20.06 CSR18 34.07 24:00 1.533 0.305 19.89
NIK-1Cc
CSR19 32.01 24:00 1.480 0.289 19.52 CSR2 35.47 25:00 1.480 0.292 19.70 CSR4 34.81 24:00 1.535 0.297 19.37 CSR18 32.50 24:00 1.527 0.294 19.25
NIK-1Cpy
CSR19 30.72 24:00 1.469 0.274 18.62 CSR2 35.18 25:00 1.478 0.290 19.63 CSR4 34.22 24:00 1.532 0.295 19.27 CSR18 32.14 24:00 1.524 0.292 19.18
NIK-1So
CSR19 30.21 24:00 1.465 0.271 18.47 CSR2 37.05 25:00 1.487 0.297 19.97 CSR4 35.87 24:00 1.539 0.304 19.76 CSR18 33.89 24:00 1.532 0.301 19.62
NIK-1Dp
CSR19 31.90 24:00 1.476 0.280 18.98 CSR2 30.75 25:00 1.435 0.255 17.77 CSR4 28.32 25:00 1.495 0.260 17.39 CSR18 27.21 24:00 1.490 0.258 17.31
Nosema bombycis
CSR19 25.57 24:00 1.431 0.242 16.91 CSR2 39.21 24:00 1.552 0.343 22.11 CSR4 38.02 23:00 1.600 0.352 22.00 CSR18 36.01 23:00 1.570 0.340 21.67
Normal control
CSR19 34.02 23:00 1.520 0.320 21.04 A CD at 5% 0.02 -- 0.001 0.001 0.05 B CD at 5% 0.03 -- 0.001 0.001 0.06
S. E. ± 0.02 -- 0.00 0.00 0.05 A×B
CD at 5% 0.06 -- 0.003 0.002 0.14
115
Table 2.22: Mortality and infection level due to five different microsporidia in Cross breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.
Mortality due to
infection (%) Microsporidian isolates
Silkworm breed
Larva Pupa
Moths infected
(%)
Total infection %
PM × CSR2 11.0(19.3) 7.3(15.7) 33.7(35.5) 52.0(46.1) NIK-1Pr
CSR2 × CSR4 42.3(40.5) 10.0(18.4) 25.3(30.2) 77.7(61.8)
PM × CSR2 6.7(15.0) 4.7(12.5) 21.0(27.2) 32.3(34.6) NIK-1Cc
CSR2 × CSR4 26.3(30.8) 6.3(14.5) 21.7(27.7) 54.3(47.4)
PM × CSR2 14.7(22.5) 6.0(14.2) 72.3(58.2) 93.0(74.6) NIK-1Cpy
CSR2 × CSR4 50.3(45.1) 9.7(18.1) 38.0(38.0) 98.0(81.8)
PM × CSR2 16.3(23.8) 8.3(16.7) 72.0(58.0) 96.7(79.5) NIK-1So
CSR2 × CSR4 52.7(46.5) 9.3(17.7) 37.0(37.4) 99.0(84.2)
PM × CSR2 10.3(18.7) 7.7(16.1) 20.7(27.0) 38.7(38.4) NIK-1Dp
CSR2 × CSR4 27.3(31.5) 9.7(18.1) 21.7(27.7) 58.7(50.0)
PM × CSR2 38.7(38.4) 9.7(18.1) 50.7(45.4) 99.0(84.2) Nosema bombycis CSR2 × CSR4 90.3(71.8) 1.3(6.5) 8.3(16.7) 100.0(90.0)
PM × CSR2 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) Normal control
CSR2 × CSR4 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0) 0.0(0.0)
A CD at 5% (0.6) (0.7) (0.5) (0.5)
B CD at 5% (0.3) -- (0.2) (0.3)
S. E. ± 0.29 0.36 0.22 0.24 (A x B)
CD at 5% (0.8) (1.0) (0.6) (0.7) Values in parenthesis are angular transformed
116
Table 2.23: Effect of infection by the isolated microsporidia on larval and cocoon characters of Cross breeds of the silkworm, Bombyx mori L.
Microspo-ridian
isolates Silkworm hybrid
Larval weight
(g)
Larval duration (D: H)
Cocoon weight
(g)
Shell weight
(g) SR %
PM × CSR2 37.11 26:00 1.518 0.254 16.72 NIK-1Pr
CSR2 × CSR4 43.97 24:00 1.674 0.338 20.17
PM × CSR2 37.20 26:00 1.534 0.259 16.86 NIK-1Cc
CSR2 × CSR4 44.01 24:00 1.681 0.345 20.50
PM × CSR2 37.08 26:00 1.514 0.251 16.60 NIK-1Cpy
CSR2 × CSR4 43.94 24:00 1.671 0.334 19.98
PM × CSR2 37.04 26:00 1.510 0.249 16.51 NIK-1So
CSR2 × CSR4 43.89 24:00 1.667 0.332 19.89
PM × CSR2 37.16 26:00 1.530 0.257 16.77 NIK-1Dp
CSR2 × CSR4 43.99 24:00 1.677 0.341 20.31
PM × CSR2 37.01 26:00 1.504 0.247 16.39 Nosema bombycis CSR2 × CSR4 43.42 25:00 1.646 0.311 18.89
PM × CSR2 38.21 25:00 1.604 0.284 17.72 Normal control CSR2 × CSR4 45.02 23:00 1.721 0.382 22.21
A CD at 5% 0.02 -- 0.002 0.001 0.07
B CD at 5% 0.01 -- 0.002 0.001 0.06
SE ± 0.01 -- 0.001 0.001 0.05 A × B
CD at 5 % 0.04 -- 0.004 0.003 0.14
117
Midgut Fat bodies
Trachea Silk gland
Malpighian tubules Gonad
Fig. 2.1: Microphotographs of different tissues of silkworm infected with the
microsporidian, NIK-1Pr (600 X) [Arrows indicate the spores]
118
Midgut Fat bodies
Trachea Silk gland
Malpighian tubules Gonad (No infection)
Fig. 2.2: Microphotographs of different tissues of silkworm infected with the
microsporidian, NIK-1Cc (600 X)
119
Midgut Fat bodies
Trachea Silk gland
Malpighian tubules Gonad
Fig. 2.3: Microphotographs of different tissues of silkworm infected with the microsporidian, NIK-1Cpy (600 X)
120
Midgut Fat bodies
Trachea Silk gland
Malpighian tubule Gonad
Fig. 2.4: Microphotographs of different tissues of silkworm infected with the
microsporidian, NIK-1So (600 X)
121
Midgut Fat bodies
Trachea Silk gland
Malpighian tubules Gonad
Fig. 2.5: Microphotographs of different tissues of silkworm infected with the
microsporidian, NIK-1Dp (600 X)
122
Midgut Fat bodies
Trachea Silk gland
Malpighian tubules Gonad
Fig. 2.6: Microphotographs of different tissues of silkworm infected with the standard
microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis (600 X)
123
Midgut Fat bodies
Trachea Silk gland
Malpighian tubules Gonad
Fig. 2.7: Microphotographs of different tissues of healthy silkworm larvae, without any
infection (600 X)
124
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Y = -1.65+ 0.82XLC50 = 10 8.110
Microsporidian NIK-1Pr
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9
Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Cc
Y = 2.22 + 0.19XLC50 = 1014.614
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Cpy
Y = 0.22 + 0.63XLC50 = 107.594
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1So
Y = 0.30 + 0.65XLC50 = 107.267
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9
Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK- 1Dp
Y = 1.91 + 0.27XLC50 = 1011.667
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9
Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian N. bombycis
Y = 0.54 + 0.64XLC50 = 106.983
Figure 2.8: Probit graphs for mortality due to isolated microsporidia and N.bombycis on
12th day PI
125
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9
Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Pr
Y = -0.04+ 0.67XLC50 = 107.528
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1 Cc
Y = 2.24 + 0.29XLC50 = 109.506
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9
Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Cpy
Y = 0.71 + 0.64XLC50 = 106.730
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1So
Y = 0.58 + 0.72XLC50 =106.179
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Dp
Y = 2.10 + 0.33XLC50 = 108.918
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9
Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian N. bombycis
Y = 0.36 + 0.82XLC50 = 105.691
Figure 2.9: Probit graphs for mortality due to isolated microsporidia and N.bombycis on
15th day PI
126
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Pr
Y = 0.10+ 0.74XLC50 = 106.627
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Cc
Y = 2.29 + 0.36XLC50 = 107.528
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Cpy
Y = 0.70 + 0.72XLC50 = 105.945
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1So
Y = 2.84 + 0.92XLC50 = 105.464
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian NIK-1Dp
Y = -0.57 + 0.77XLC50 = 107.234
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 3 6 9Log concentration
Pro
bit o
f mor
talit
y
Microsporidian N. bombycis
Y = 2.11 + 0.54XLC50 = 105.364
Figure 2.10: Probit graphs for mortality due to isolated microsporidia and N.bombycis on 21st day PI
127
35.0
30.3
25.7
21.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 3 5 7
Number of carrier larvae introduced
To
tal s
pre
ad
%
Fig. 2.11: Total spread of microsporidiosis in healthy colonies of silkworm by the microsporidian, NIK-1Pr
25.0
21.3
15.7
10.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 3 5 7Number of carrier larvae introduced
To
tal s
pre
ad
%
Fig. 2.12: Total spread of microsporidiosis in healthy colonies of silkworm by the microsporidian, NIK-1Cc
128
35.0
40.345.7
50.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1 3 5 7Number of carrier larvae introduced
Tot
al s
prea
d %
Fig. 2.13: Total spread of microsporidiosis in healthy colonies of silkworm by the microsporidian, NIK-1Cpy
45.7
38.7
31.7
27.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 3 5 7
Number of carrier larvae introduced
To
tal s
prea
d %
Fig. 2.14: Total spread of microsporidiosis in healthy colonies of silkworm by the microsporidian, NIK-1So
129
27.3
24.0
19.7
13.3
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1 3 5 7Number of carrier larvae introduced
To
tal s
pre
ad
%
Fig. 2.15: Total spread of microsporidiosis in healthy colonies of silkworm by the microsporidian, NIK-1Dp
74.0
57.353.3
47.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 3 5 7Number of carrier larvae introduced
To
tal s
pre
ad
%
Fig. 2.16: Total spread of microsporidiosis in healthy colonies of silkworm by the standard microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis
130
65.371.3
60.756.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.17: Total infection % in Multivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Pr
48.7
56.7
43.740.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.18: Total infection % in Multivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Cc
131
96.0 98.0 100.0 99.0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
Tot
al in
fect
ion
%
Fig. 2.19: Total infection % in Multivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Cpy
100.0100.0100.098.7
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.20: Total infection % in Multivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1So
132
54.2
60.3
46.443.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.21: Total infection % in Multivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Dp
100.0100.0100.0100.0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Mult ivolt ine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.22: Total infection % in Multivoltine breeds by the standard microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis
133
5.39
8.79
6.07
4.91
0
5
10
PM Nistari ND7 NP1
Multivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.23: Percentage reduction in SR% of Multivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Pr compared to healthy control
3.28
7.74
4.57
2.59
0
5
10
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R%
Fig. 2.24: Percentage reduction in SR% of Multivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Cc compared to healthy control
134
6.03
9.33
6.836.03
0
5
10
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
% R
educt
ion in
SR
%
Fig. 2.25: Percentage reduction in SR% of Multivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Cpy compared to healthy control
6.25
9.73
7.376.46
0
5
10
15
PM Nistari ND7 NP1
Multivoltine breeds
% R
educ
tion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.26: Percentage reduction in SR% of Multivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1So compared to healthy control
135
4.52
8.29
4.98
3.16
0
5
10
PM Nistari ND7 NP1
Multivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.27: Percentage reduction in SR% of Multivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Dp compared to healthy control
11.3212.12
13.11
18.25
0
5
10
15
20
PM Nistari ND7 NP1Multivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.28: Percentage reduction in SR% of Multivoltine breeds due to the standard microsporidian strain, N.bombycis compared to healthy control
136
72.369.0
81.384.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.29: Total infection % in Bivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Pr
50.045.7
59.363.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19
Bivoltine breeds
Tot
al in
fect
ion
%
Fig. 2.30: Total infection % in Bivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Cc
137
97.095.0100.0100.0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.31: Total infection % in Bivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Cpy
97.397.0100.0100.0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.32: Total infection % in Bivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1So
138
55.051.0
62.767.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.33: Total infection % in Bivoltine breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Dp
100.0100.0100.0100.0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.34: Total infection % in Bivoltine breeds by the standard microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis
139
10.8310.1911.27
10.17
0
5
10
15
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.35: Percentage reduction in SR% of Bivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Pr compared to healthy control
7.22
8.218.818.91
0
5
10
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.36: Percentage reduction in SR% of Bivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Cc compared to healthy control
140
11.5011.1611.95
10.90
0
5
10
15
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.37: Percentage reduction in SR% of Bivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Cpy compared to healthy control
12.2111.49
12.4011.21
0
5
10
15
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19Bivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.38: Percentage reduction in SR% of Bivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1So compared to healthy control
141
9.799.4610.18
9.67
0
5
10
15
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19
Bivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.39: Percentage reduction in SR% of Bivoltine breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Dp compared to healthy control
19.6220.1120.9519.62
0
5
10
15
20
25
CSR2 CSR4 CSR18 CSR19
Bivoltine breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.40: Percentage reduction in SR% of Bivoltine breeds due to the standard microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis compared to healthy control
142
77.7
52.0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
Tot
al in
fect
ion
%
Fig. 2.41: Total infection % in Cross breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Pr
54.3
32.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.42: Total infection % in Cross breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Cc
143
93.098.0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
Tot
al in
fect
ion
%
Fig. 2.43: Total infection % in Cross breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Cpy
99.096.7
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4
Cross breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.44: Total infection % in Cross breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1So
144
38.7
58.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4
Cross breeds
To
tal i
nfec
tion
%
Fig. 2.45: Total infection % in Cross breeds by the microsporidian NIK-1Dp
100.099.0
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
To
tal i
nfe
ctio
n %
Fig. 2.46: Total infection % in Cross breeds by the standard microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis
145
9.18
5.64
0
5
10
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.47: Percentage reduction in SR% of Cross breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Pr compared to healthy control
7.69
4.85
0
5
10
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4
Cross breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.48: Percentage reduction in SR% of Cross breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Cc compared to healthy control
146
10.04
6.32
0
5
10
15
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.49: Percentage reduction in SR% of Cross breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Cpy compared to healthy control
10.44
6.82
0
5
10
15
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4
Cross breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.50: Percentage reduction in SR% of Cross breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1So compared to healthy control
147
8.55
5.36
0
5
10
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.51: Percentage reduction in SR% of Cross breeds due to the microsporidian NIK-1Dp compared to healthy control
14.94
7.50
0
5
10
15
20
PM×CSR2 CSR2×CSR4Cross breeds
% R
ed
uct
ion
in S
R %
Fig. 2.52: Percentage reduction in SR% of Cross breeds due to the standard microsporidian strain, Nosema bombycis compared to healthy control