Chapter 2 - Project Selection
-
Upload
praveen-sharma -
Category
Documents
-
view
61 -
download
5
description
Transcript of Chapter 2 - Project Selection
![Page 1: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Project ManagementA Managerial Approach
![Page 2: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Project ManagementA Managerial Approach
Chapter 2
Project Selection
![Page 3: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Project Selection Procedure: A Cross- Industry Sampler
Hoechst AG, a pharma firm uses a scoring portfolio model with 119 questions in five major categories i.e: business strategy fit, probability of technical success, commercial success, strategic leverage and reward to the company. Within each of these factors there are specific questions which are scored on a 1-10 by the management.
The Royal Bank of Canada uses the foll criteria for portfolio scoring: Project importance( strategic importance, magnitude of impact and economic benefits) ease of doing (cost of development, project complexity and resource availability) Expected annual expenditure and total project spending are then added to this rank ordered list to prioritize project options.
![Page 4: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Project Selection
Project selection is the process of evaluating individual projects or groups of projects, and then choosing to implement some set of them so that the objectives of the parent organization will be achieved
Managers often use decision-aiding models to extract the relevant issues of a problem from the details in which the problem is embedded
Models represent the problem’s structure and can be useful in selecting and evaluating projects
![Page 5: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Criteria for Project Selection Models (Souder) Realism - reality of manager’s decision
Capability- able to simulate different scenarios and optimize the
decision
Flexibility - provide valid results within the range of conditions
Ease of Use - reasonably convenient, easy execution, and easily
understood
Cost - Data gathering and modeling costs should be low relative to
the cost of the project
Easy Computerization - must be easy and convenient to gather,
store and manipulate data in the model
![Page 6: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Key issues in Project analysis
Market factorsProduction Factors /Technical analysisFinancial factorsPersonnel factorsAdministrative factors
![Page 7: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Marketing Factors
Size of potential market for output
Probable market share of output
Time until market share is acquired
Impact on current product line
Consumer acceptance
Impact on consumer safety
Estimated life of output
Spin-off project possibilities
![Page 8: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Production factors
• Time until ready to install
• Length of disruption during installation
• Learning curve-time until operating as desired.
• Effects on waste & rejects
• Energy requirements
• Facility & other equipment requirements
• Safety of process
• Other applications of technology
• Changes in cost to produce a unit output
![Page 9: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
PRODUCTION FACTORS (contd.)
• Change in raw material usage
• Availability of raw materials
• Required development time & cost
• Impact on current suppliers
• Change in quality of output
![Page 10: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Financial Factors
• Profitability
• Impact on cash flows• Payout periodIn entrepreneurship, a period of time in
which cash flow is negative. This especially applies to an early part of a company's history before it has recovered start up costs and operating expenses.
• Cash requirements
• Time until break-even
• Size of investment required
• Impact on seasonal &cyclic fluctuations
![Page 11: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Personnel factors
• Training requirements
• Labour skill requirements
• Availability of required labour skill
• Level of resistance from current work force
• Change in size of labour force
• Inter & intra group communication requirements
• Impact on working conditions
![Page 12: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Administrative & Miscellaneous factors
• Meet govt. safety,environmental standards
• Impact on information system
• Reaction of stock holders & securities market
• Patent & trade secret protection
• Impact of image with customers, suppliers & competitors
• Degree to which we understand new technology
• Managerial capacity to direct & control new process
![Page 13: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Nature of Project Selection Models
2 Basic Types of ModelsNumericNonnumeric
Two Critical Facts:Models do not make decisions - People do!All models, however sophisticated, are only partial
representations of the reality the are meant to reflect
![Page 14: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Nonnumeric Models
Sacred Cow - project is suggested by a senior and powerful official in the organization
Operating Necessity - the project is required to keep the
system running
Competitive Necessity - project is necessary to sustain a
competitive position
Product Line Extension - projects are judged on how they fit
with current product line, fill a gap, strengthen a weak link, or extend the line in a new desirable way.
Comparative Benefit Model - several projects are
considered and the one with the most benefit to the firm is selected
![Page 15: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Numeric Models: Scoring
Unweighted 0-1 Factor Model
Unweighted Factor Scoring Model
Weighted Factor Scoring Model
Constrained Weighted Factor Scoring Model
Goal Programming with Multiple Objectives
![Page 16: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
NUMERIC MODELS-SCORING
UNWEIGHTED 0-1 FACTOR MODEL -A set of relevant factors is selected by management & then listed in a preprinted form. One or more raters score the project on each factor, whether or not it qualifies for an individual criterion.
![Page 17: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Qualify Does not qualify
Potential market size *Time to break-even less than 3 years *No quality compromise *Need for external consultants *Impact on work force safety *Estimated annual profits $250,000 *
Total 4 2
Project________
Rater_________
Date__________
![Page 18: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
UNWEIGHTED FACTOR SCORING MODEL-the earlier model had the drawback of considering all criteria equally important & involves no gradation of the degree to which a specific project meets the various criteria.
This model addresses the second drawback by constructing a simple linear measure of the degree to which the project being evaluated meets each of the criteria contained in the list
![Page 19: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Unweighted Factor Scoring model….
Score Performance level
5 Very good Grows by 40%
4 Good Grows by 25%
3 Fair Grows by 10%
2 Poor Not affected at all
1 Very Poor Negatively affected
Eg: Potential market size: Total score should exceed some set critical value
![Page 20: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
WEIGHTED FACTOR SCORING MODEL
Numeric weights reflecting the relative importance of each individual factor are added.
It is the sum of products of scores and weights on each criterion.
It is also useful for improvement of the project.
The weight may be generated by any of the following techniques:
1. Delphi technique (developing numerical values which are equivalent to subjective , verbal measures of relative value.)
2. Analytical hierarchy process
3. Successive comparison / pair wise comparisons
![Page 21: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Exercise
Use a weighted scoring model to chose an automobile. The performance measures and scores, as also the relative weights of each criterion are shown in the following table.
![Page 22: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Performance measures and scores for automobile selection
Criteria 1 2 3 4 5
Appearance Ugh Poor Adequate Good Wow
Braking >165 165-150 150-140 140-130 <130
Comfort Bad Poor Adequate Good Excellent
Cost (Operating) >$2.5 2.1-2.5$ 1.9-2.1$ 1.6-1.9$ <1.6$
Cost (Original) >$32.5 26-32.5$ 21-26$ 17-21$ <$17
Handling <45 45-49.5 49.5-55 55-59 >59
Reliability Worst Poor Adequate Good Excellent
![Page 23: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
The criteria and weights for automobile purchase are given below.
----------------------------------------------------Criteria Weight A B C D------------------------------------------------------------------------Appearance .1 3 3 2 5Braking .07 1 3 1 4Comfort .17 4 2 4 3Cost, operating .12 2 5 4 2Cost, original .24 1 4 3 2Handling .17 2 2 1 5Reliability .12 3 4 3 2------------------------------------------------------------------------Develop a weighted scoring model for making an automobile choice.
![Page 24: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Scores for automobilesA=2.23B=3.23C=2.68D=3.10B is the best option
![Page 25: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Sensitivity analysis
A weighted scoring model can also be used for project improvement.
For any given criterion, the difference between the criterion’s score and the highest possible score on that criterion , multiplied by the weight of the criterion , is a measure of the potential improvement in the project score that would result, were the project’s performance on the specific criterion sufficiently improved.
It may be that such an improvement is not feasible. Such an analysis yields valuable statement of
comparative benefits of project improvements. By adding resources we can study the degree to which a
project’s score is sensitive to attempts for improvement.
![Page 26: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
CONSTRAINED WEIGHTED FACTOR SCORING MODEL-
• Involves constraints representing project characteristics that must be present or absent in order for the project to be acceptable.
•In is the sum of products of scores and weights on each criterion, multiplied by a value of 1(if the ith project satisfies the kth constraint & 0 if it does not)
• Other elements in this model are the same as in the previous model . A company may have decided that they would not undertake any project that would significantly lower the quality of the final product.
![Page 27: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Profit / profitability
Pay back periodAverage Rate of returnDiscounted cash flowInternal rate of returnProfitability Index
![Page 28: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Payback period
Payback Period=
Initial fixed investment/estimated annual net cash inflow
It is the no. of years required for the project to repay the initial fixed investment.
The faster the investment recovered , the less the risk.
![Page 29: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Average Rate of Return
Average rate of return=
Average Annual Profit/initial or avg. investment
Does not take into account the time value of money.
![Page 30: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Exercise
Initial fixed investment=$5,00,000Annual net cash inflow=$1,00,000Average annual profits=$70,000
Calculate the payback period & Average Rate of return.
![Page 31: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
NPVNPV = - I = - IO O FFtt
(1 + k)(1 + k) tt
nn
t=1t=1
Discounted Cash Discounted Cash flow/NPVflow/NPV
Determines the NPV of all cash Determines the NPV of all cash flows byflows by discounting them by required rate discounting them by required rate of return.of return.Ft=net cash flow in period tFt=net cash flow in period tk=required rate of returnk=required rate of returnII00=Initial cash investment=Initial cash investment
![Page 32: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
n
t=1IRR: = IO CFt
(1 + IRR) t
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
IRR=discount rate that equates IRR=discount rate that equates the presentthe presentvalues of the cash inflows and values of the cash inflows and outflows. outflows. IRR is simply the rate of return IRR is simply the rate of return that thethat the firm earns on its capital firm earns on its capital budgeting projects.budgeting projects.
![Page 33: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Profitability index
Present value of all future expected cash flows divided by initial cash investment.
![Page 34: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Question-
Consider the following 2 projects-
Project A Project B
Initial value of investment Rs. 5,00,000 Rs.11,00,000
Present value of cash inflowsRs.6,00,000 Rs. 12,50,000
NPV Rs.1,00,000 Rs. 1, 50,000
Which model will you chose to evaluate the 2 projects. Why?
![Page 35: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Solution-
Comparing NPV, project B will score high. However, NPV is only an absolute figure. For an investment of 5Lakh, Project A offers
NPV of Rs. 1 lakh, whereas for investment of 11 lakh, B offers NPV of 1.5 lakh.
In such a situation, PI is a better indicator. PI=PV of cash flow/Initial cash outflow. PI for A=1.200 and PI for B=1.136 Since PI of A is more than that of B, A is a better
project.
![Page 36: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Advantages of Numeric Model
Simple to use and understand. Readily available accounting data to determine
cash flow. Direct reflection of managerial policy. Easily altered to accommodate changes in
environment or managerial policy. Can assess project risk. Weighted scoring models allow for the fact that
some criteria are more important than the others. Allow sensitivity analysis. The tradeoffs between
different criteria are readily available.
![Page 37: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Disadvantages
It ignores qualitative aspects The output of a scoring model is strictly a
relative measure. Project scores do not represent the value or utility associated with a project and thus do not indicate whether or not the project should be supported
Biased Other limitations of individual profitability
models
![Page 38: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Risk Versus Uncertainty
Analysis Under Uncertainty - The Management of Risk The difference between risk and uncertainty
Risk - when the decision maker knows the probability of each and every state of nature and thus each and every outcome. An expected value of each alternative action can be determined
Uncertainty - when a decision maker has information that is not complete and therefore cannot determine the expected value of each alternative
![Page 39: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Involved at all stages of project management
What is risk?an event about which we are uncertain and the possibility of the result is unfavourable.
If it is favourable, it turns out to be an opportunity.
PROJECT RISK is the cumulative effect of the chances of an uncertain occurrence adversely affecting the project objectives. Or, the degree to which project objectives are exposed to negative events and their probable consequences, as expressed in terms of scope, quality, time & cost.
Risk
![Page 40: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Types of risk
1. Project –specific risk- the earnings & cash flows of the project may be lower than expected due to an estimation error or lower quality of management
2. Competitive risk -the earnings & cash flows of the project may be effected by some unanticipated actions of the competitors
3. Industry -specific risk-unexpected technological developments & regulatory changes that are specific to the industry to which the project belongs ,will have an impact on the earnings & cash flows of the project as well
![Page 41: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
.
4. Market risk-unanticipated changes in macroeconomic factors like GDP growth rate, interest rate, inflation etc. have an impact on all projects in varying degrees.
5. International risk-in case of foreign projects exchange rate risk /political risk may effect cash flows.
An evaluation of potential risks can show at an early stage whether or not a proposal is worth pursuing.
The risks can be---
1) the project will fail completely
2) The project will be compromised on time, cost or both.
![Page 42: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Comments on the Information Base for Selections
Accounting DataMeasurements
Subjective vs. ObjectiveQuantitative vs. QualitativeReliable vs. UnreliableValid vs. Invalid
Technological Shock
![Page 43: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Project Portfolio Process
An 8 step procedure for selecting , implementing and reviewing projects that will help an organization achieve its goals.
![Page 44: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Project Portfolio Process
Establish a project council Identify project categories and criteria
Derivative projects-are projects with objectives or deliverables that are only incrementally different in both product and process from existing offerings.
Platform projects-The planned outputs of these projects represent major departures from existing offerings in terms of either the product/service itself or the process used to make and deliver it or both.
![Page 45: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Breakthrough projects-These projects typically involve a newer technology than platform projects. It may be a “disruptive” technology that is known to the industry or something proprietary that the organization has been developing over
R&D Projects-are visionary endeavors oriented toward using newly developed technologies, or existing technologies in a new manner.
![Page 46: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Collect Project DataAssess Resource AvailabilityReduce the project and criteria setPrioritise the projects within categoriesSelect the projects to be funded and held
in reserve.Implement the process.
![Page 47: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Project Proposals
Which projects should be bid on?How should the proposal-preparation
process be organized and staffed?How much should be spent on preparing
proposals for bids?How should the bid prices be set?What is the bidding strategy? Is it ethical?
![Page 48: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Project ProposalContents
Executive Summary Cover Letter Nature of the technical problem Plan for Implementation of Project Plan for Logistic Support & Administration of the
project Description of group proposing to do the work Any relevant past experience that can be applied
![Page 49: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Discussion…
In the next 2 years a large municipal company must begin gas storage facilities as per new govt. regulations. The V.P. incharge of the project feels there are 2 options. One-underground deep storage facility (UDSF) and two-Liquified natural gas facility (LNGF). The V.P has developed a project selection model.
Option Initial cost Operating cost Exp Life Salvage valueUDSF 10 L $ $.004 20 yrs 10%LNGF 25L$ $.002 15 yrs 5Use Souder’s criteria to evaluate this model.(Realism, Capability, flexibility, ease of use, cost, computerization)
![Page 50: Chapter 2 - Project Selection](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022052307/55299fac550346662e8b483f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Discussion…
In the next 2 years a large municipal company must begin gas storage facilities as per new govt. regulations. The V.P. incharge of the project feels there are 2 options. One-underground deep storage facility (UDSF) and two-Liquified natural gas facility (LNGF). The V.P has developed a project selection model.
Option Initial cost Operating cost/cu.ft Exp Life Salvage value
UDSF 10 L $ $.004 20 yrs 10%LNGF 25L$ $.002 15 yrs 5%Use Souder’s criteria to evaluate this model.(Realism, Capability, flexibility, ease of use, cost, computerization)