Chapter 2

Part II

2

Review of the Appointments Process

The ultimate control over an agency is through hiring and firing agency personnel, or at least through having that option available

3

Congressional Limitations on Appointments

Congress creates and shapes the executive branch Without specific appropriations, there would be no

White House and the president would have to rent space from his own pocket

Under the Appointments Clause, Congress cannot make appointments to executive branch agencies

Congress can impose requirements on appointments Limitations on who can be appointed, such as

requiring political balance on the FEC Limitations on removal, as in independent agencies

4

Art II, sec. 2, cl 2 - the Appointments Clause

"[The President] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint... all other [principal] Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law:

but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.“

5

Civil Service

Congress developed the Civil Service to protect workers from losing their jobs every time the administration changed

Most personnel are civil service and can only be fired for cause with due process Limited due process for security agencies This was carried over and broadened in

the Homeland Security Agency

6

Pros and Cons of the Civil Service

Why is important to you if you want to be a government lawyer? What are the problems with the system? How high should it go?

Career track problem for senior people without lucrative outside jobs Health Directors Lawyers in specialized areas without private

practice

7

Buckley v. Valeo

Original process for selecting members of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Two members appointed by the President pro

tempore of the Senate, two by the Speaker of the House, and two by the President (all subject to

confirmation by both Houses of Congress), and the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the

House as ex officio nonvoting members Challenged as an Appointments Clause violation

8

The Role of the FEC

What does FEC do that is forbidden to Congress? How does allowing congress to appoint

commission members undermine separation of powers?

Was the selection process for the FEC commissioners constitutional?

9

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO)

The “primary function” of the CBO is to give the House and Senate Committees on the Budget information that “will assist such committees in the discharge of all matters within their jurisdiction.” The CBO also has additional duties, all of which relate to giving Congress information on budget matters.

The Director is appointed for a four-year term by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate.

Does this appointment scheme violate the Appointments Clause?

10

Washington Airports Authority v. Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc. (“MWAA”)

The federal statute authorized the airports to be run by an Airport Authority Major decisions of the Airport Authority were

subject to the veto of a “Board of Review.” The federal statute dictated that the Board be

composed exclusively of Members of Congress. Putting aside the Appointments Clause issue, how

does this violate Bicameralism and Presentment?

11

The Library of Congress

The Librarian is appointed by the President. Its operation is overseen, however, by the Joint

Committee of Congress on the Library. The Joint Committee consists of the chairman and

four members of the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate and the chairman and four members of the Committee on House Oversight of the House of Representatives.

Does the congressional composition of the Joint Committee violate the Appointments Clause? MWAA?

12

Congressional Removal of Executive Branch Officers

Impeachment Brought by the house Senate as jury Only for “Treason, Bribery, or other high

Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Why is this of limited effectiveness for agency

oversight? Could Congress remove the head of the CBO?

13

Legislative Veto - See Chapter 2, Part I

14

Formal Legislative Review and Oversight of Executive Branch Agencies

(1) an appropriations committee, which oversees how the agency spends its budget;

(2) a “substantive” committee, which oversees the substance of the agency’s work; and

(3) “government operations” committee, which is concerned with the agency’s efficiency and its coordination with other parts of the government.

One of each of these three types of committees will exist in both the Senate and the House.

What agency is getting hostile "oversight" right now?

15

Informal Legislative Review and Oversight

Members of Congress enjoy the same right as their constituents to “petition” their government, including the relevant agency, about some grievance of their own or their constituents. all types of contacts (telephone calls, e-mails, and so on)

between individual Members of Congress, or the Member’s staffs, or a committee’s staff, and agency officials.

Many of these informal contacts relate to discrete agency actions affecting specific constituents.

Do you think Congressmen get better service? Where does lobbying come in? Charlie Wilson's War?

16

Earmarks

Congress enacts a statute that appropriates a lump sum of $10 million for the Indian Health Service (“IHS”)

The appropriations statute is accompanied by a report from the appropriations committee saying that IHS should use part of the $10 million to continue operating an existing medical clinic.

The appropriations statute itself, however, does not refer to the clinic. Nor does IHS’s organic statute.

The organic statute broadly authorizes IHS to spend its appropriation “for the benefit, care, and assistance of the Indians.”

What if the agency ignores the report and closes the health center? Can this be challenged in court?

17

Vesting and Take Care Clauses

“The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.” U.S. Const. art. II, § 1.

Article II says that the President, specifically, “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” Art. II, § 3.

Together, these define the source of the president's domestic powers

18

President Nixon and the Independent Counsel

What was the Saturday night massacre? Why do the liberals really hate Bork?

He carried out Nixon's order to fire Cox Nixon's firing of the independent prosecutor

was the background for this law

19

What was Clinton's biggest political mistake?

Not vetoing the renewal of the Independent counsel law

Hubris - it had been attacking Republicans and he was going to have the most ethical administration

20

Morrison v. Olson, 487 US 654 (1988)

Why was Olson suing and what did he want? What triggers the appointment of an independent

counsel? Who appoints the independent counsel? Why will this always be political?

Reno and Gore Ashcroft and Halliburton

21

The court created a core function standard for inferior officers

Is it an "inferior" official? yes, because of the limited mandate

Is this a critical area for the president to control the exercise of discretion? no, that is why it is independent

Does the president retain enough control? yes, good cause is good enough, and this is

exercised through someone (AG) the president controls

22

What was the key issue in Olson?

The limitation of the removal power to good cause, rather than at-will

Does this impermissibly interfere with the president's power to carry out the laws? Majority says no, rejects the use of "quasi-

legislative/quasi-judicial" labels and focuses on separation of powers

23

Intimidation by the IC

Scalia saw this as a stark limitation on the president's power to exclusively control the executive branch

He pointed out that while the IC may not intimidate the president, it will affect executive branch officers who are subject to what seems political prosecution

24

Was Scalia Right?

What was he worried about as regards the power of the office? He stresses the broad powers of the IC

What would it cost you to be investigated? Was Scalia right about the impact of the IC?

25

Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651 (1997)

The judges are subject to administrative supervision by the Judge Advocate General, who also has the power to remove them without cause.

The judges’ decisions are subject to review by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

In Edmond, the Court held that judges of the Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals are “inferior” officers. The Edmond Court based that holding exclusively on

the fact these judges’ work is directed and supervised by principal officers.

26

Congressional Determinations

If the Congress establishes that the position is an inferior officer, the courts have not second-guessed it. This might change if Congress created an inferior

office that was clear the job of a principal officer. Be careful of circular arguments

Just because an officer is not required to be appointed under the appointment's clause, that does not prevent the court from finding that the position is covered by the Appointment's Clause

27

Tenure of Office Act – 1867

If Congress is silent on removal, the officer serves at the discretion of the President

This Act limited the right of presidents to remove cabinet members without the consent of the Senate President Andrew Johnson removed the

Secretary of War Was impeached, but not removed by one vote

There are now no limitations on removal of Cabinet Officers

28

Stopped here

29

Myers v. US, 272 US 52 (1926)

Why all this concern about postmasters? President Wilson discharged an Oregon

postmaster without cause Postmaster sued for back pay under a law

passed after the Tenure in Office Act that required the senate to approve appointment and removal of postmasters

Chief Justice and Ex-President Taft wrote the opinion, which found that the Tenure in Office Act and related acts an unconstitutional limit on presidential power.

30

Humphrey’s Executor v. US, 295 US 602 (1935)

Less than 10 years later, Meyers is again at issue - what is the political change over that period?

Why was the FTC controversial at that time? What was the restriction on removing FTC

commissioners? How did the lawsuit arise?

President fired Humphrey from the FTC Humphrey died and his executor sued for the

pay for the rest of his term

31

Myers Redux

Why did the court change its view on the removal power? How is a postmaster different from an FTC

commissioner? (This has not been important in later cases)

What type of agency does this create? Where does the independence come from? Are the agencies independent if the President

serves two terms?

32

How could the president fire an FTC commissioner?

In theory the president could state a cause and fire a commissioner, but it has not happened

Does this mean that they always stay when the president in unhappy with them?

It has not been an issue because they get hounded out of office if there is cause

This is an area where the presidents have not challenged the court

33

How did the Sentencing Commission Affect Sentencing?

Sentences were made longer and the judges lost discretion to shorten them. White collar criminals did more jail time First time drug offenders did a lot more time. Limited and eliminated various ways to shorten

a sentence (no parole) End result was the opposite of the intention

34

Mistretta v. US – 1989

This case attacked the US Sentencing Commission as an impermissible limitation on the Judicial Branch The Commission is an independent commission in the

Judicial Branch The members are appointed by the President There are no terms of office

The Court found that the president could remove them, even though this is not an executive branch agency

35

The Mistretta Ruling

Read to as holding that the president can remove anyone he appoints, as long as there are no terms of office

The Court upheld this commission because of it peculiar nature, finding that it did not unduly affect the judicial branch

Is there any right to judicial discretion? Probably limited by the power of congress to set

sentences - nothing says judges are allowed sentencing discretion

The powers of the sentencing commission have now been limited on due process grounds

36

Removal Wrap Up (revised)

What if the statute says an officer serves until removed for good cause, but does not specify a term of office?

Can the head of a department remove inferior officers he has appointed?

Unless Congress creates a term of office, if you appoint someone, you can fire them.

Terms of office for agency heads create independent agencies These agencies are still executive branch

agencies

37

Executive Orders (New Slide)

Orders from the President to agency heads Sets policy on discretionary decisions Not defined by the Constitution or legislation

38

Types of Executive Orders (New Slide)

Domestic Policy Orders http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/orders/

National Security Orders http://www.loc.gov/rr/news/directives.html

39

Examples of Executive Orders (New Slide)

The Steel Seizure Order (Youngstown) http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/nat-sec/eo-103

40.htm Response to 9/11

http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/adlaw/homeland_security.htm

40

Limits on Executive Orders (New Slide)

Cannot change budgetary allocations Cannot change statutory duties

The Gag Rule controversy (Rust v. Sullivan) Cannot abrogate due process

No directing the result of an adjudication Cannot legislate

President cannot make binding regulations by Executive Order

Cannot use them to change policy for Independent Agencies

41

OMB/EO Review

Executive branch review done through executive orders

The purpose is to “reform and make more efficient the regulatory process.

42

“Principles of Regulation”

These principles require agencies to consider many factors when devising a regulation, including the costs and benefits of the regulation; alternatives to the regulation; and the impact of the regulation on state, local, and tribal governments and officials.

Each agency designates a “Regulatory Policy Officer” (“RPO”).

The RPO reports to the head of the agency and must be involved “at each stage of the regulatory process to foster the development of effective, innovative, and least burdensome regulations and to further the principles [for regulation].”

43

Regulatory Agenda

The regulatory agenda is “an inventory of all regulations under development or review” by that agency.

The “regulatory plan” identifies “the most important significant regulatory actions” that the agency plans to take in the next year or so.

The regulatory agenda (with its regulatory plan) goes to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) OIRA circulates it to other agencies and conducts its

own review for conflicts OIRA also has meetings with the agency and Vice

President to coordinate agency action

44

OIRA Review of Significant Regulatory Actions

Significant regulatory actions are proposed regulations: (1) that have a major effect on the economy; the environment;

public health; state, local, or tribal governments; communities; or existing federal programs;

(2) that conflict with other agency actions; or (3) that raise novel legal issues or policy issues.

OIRA considers whether the planned regulation: conflicts with the actions or planned actions of any other

agency. complies with the applicable law, the President’s priorities, and

the principles for regulation. OIRA sends the written results of this review back to the agency

and involves the president if it cannot resolve problems

45

Independent Agencies

OIRA reporting requirements, which can be waived

OIRA can make recommendations If the agency rejects the recommendations, the

president or vice-president are not involved What if the problem with OIRA review of

independent agencies?

46

Judicial Review of Executive Review

E.O. 12866 states that it “does not create any right or benefit . . . enforceable at law or equity” against the government or its officials.

This prevents direct judicial review of alleged violations of E.O. 12866.

47

Line Item Veto - Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998)

What is a line item veto? Why do presidents want them?

How might a line item veto cause a president problems?

What separation of powers issues does it raise? How did the court rule in this case? Why was a line item veto unnecessary in the

founders vision of the operation of federal budget? How have things changed?