Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

27
Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results

Transcript of Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Page 1: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Chapter 15

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

1

Managing for Results

Page 2: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Learning Objectives

• Roles of accountants in the management of governmental and not-for-profit organizations

• How program budgets overcome limitations of traditional object-classification budgets

• The need for, and characteristics of, sound operational objectives

• Risks of establishing explicit organizational objectives

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

2

Page 3: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Learning objectives (cont’d)

• Ways in which program budgets link expenditures to objectives

• Advantages and disadvantages of program budgets• Importance of reporting measures of service efforts

and accomplishments• Special problems in capital expenditures budgeting for

governments and not-for-profits.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

3

Page 4: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Role of Accountants

• They play multiple roles in entity’s management.

There are 4 phases to the process:• When social problems arise: area specialistso Collect and analyze budgetary and financial

informationo Compare potential costs and benefitso Accountants can make valuable contribution to

this phase.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

4

Page 5: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Role of Accountants (cont’d)• When policy-makers select among the options

presented to them:-Accountants have less to contribute in this

phase.• When programs are administered by appropriate

agencies:-Accountants actively involve in establishing

plans, operating budgets, controlling costs, preparing financial and other operating reports.

• When programs are audited: o Assessed by audit teams where accountants play a vital role. o The teams also include statisticians, economists, and other specialists.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

5

Page 6: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Limitations of Traditional Budgets• Budget:o is the most significant of financial documentso Determines amounts of resources to be receivedo Details the financial strategy of the organization

• Limitation: But budget doesn’t provide information on the extent the expenditures will enable the organization to achieve its objectives.

• Operational objectives:o Is at the heart of budgetingo Signifies specific sought-after resultso Should be both quantifiable and measurable

NOTE: Please look at the proposed budget for Highland Hills Assistance League on pg. 653.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

6

Page 7: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Traditional Budgeting Model

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

7

Page 8: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Characteristics of Operational Objectives

Operational objectives:

• Are the basis for allocating resources, managing day-to-day activities.

• Are not the means to achieve organization’s goals. Instead, they represent the outcomes.

• Should be precise, doable and measurable.• Generally includes multiple objectives.• The central theme of recent management literature.

This suggests that organizations should be ‘mission’ driven rather than ‘rules’ driven.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

8

Page 9: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Adverse Consequences

Operational objectives:• May give rise to conflict• Risk of alienating organization’s

constituents• May result in dysfunctional behavior• Employees may target their efforts toward

improving what will be measured rather than what may be beneficial to the organization.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

9

Page 10: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Performance Budgets

• Relate expenditures to operational objectives.• Used instead of, or as a supplement to the traditional

object classification budgets.• Program budgets:o Common type of performance budgetso Allocate funds by program and not by objectso Ex. Funds appropriated for fire prevention

programs, health programs, for public safety programs etc.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

10

Page 11: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Performance Budgets (cont’d)

• Composed of activities directed toward a common goal.

• Generally carried out within a single organizational unit

• May also cut across departments.• Zero-base budgeting (ZBB):

o one variant of program budgetingo Requires explicit decisions and judgmentso Mandates that both current and proposed activities

be subject to common review.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

11

Page 12: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Focus on Activities• Expenditures are mostly classified based on object

and fund.• They should also be broken down by activities. • Ex: Highland Hills Assistance League maintains the

following programs:oEmployment skills, Housing rehabilitation, and

Teen substance abuse• Following are examples of activities in the

employment skills programs: oJob-seeking skills, Computer training, Electronics

training, and Day care Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

12

Page 13: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Review and Ranking

• Once requests for funding have been prepared, they must be reviewed and ranked.

• Sometimes, individual units establish criteria on how to rank the funding proposals.

• Some organizations establish uniform guidelines for their units.

• Organizations give prioritize to activities that will advance a particular phase of its mission.

• For instance, Highland Hills Assistance League may give priority to activities that involve children.

NOTE: An example of Budget Ranking Schedule can be found on Pg. 655.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

13

Page 14: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Advantages of Program Budgeting

• Directly relates expenditures to objectives• Considers alternative means of achieving the

same objective • Promotes analysis of behavior of costs • Encourages Periodic review of programs and

activities to ensure that they are consistent with the organization’s objectives.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

14

Page 15: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Disadvantages of Program Budgeting

• Organizational objectives may provoke conflict.

• The specific rankings of activities may make some employees feel that they are less important.

• It links expenditures with anticipated outcomes. Increasing budget will not necessarily lead to an increase in the outcome.

• May require extra efforts for initial implementation.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

15

Page 16: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Disadvantages (cont’d)

• May present decision makers with overwhelming amount of information.

• Technical adjustments to computer programs and control systems may be very expensive.

• It may not live up to the expectations of participants in the budgetary process.

• Program officials’ rankings might be overridden by the ultimate decision makers due to which the officials may become cynical toward the entire budget process.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

16

Page 17: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Service Efforts and Accomplishments

• GASB established the following as one of the main objectives of financial reporting: “Financial reporting should provide information to assist users in assessing the service efforts costs and accomplishments of the governmental entity.”

• In order to achieve this objective, GASB has conducted research on service efforts and accomplishments (SEA) indicators.

• In order to tie budgets to specific performance objectives: o an organization should periodically report to what extent it has

achieved those objectives.o should report results and audit those results.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

17

Page 18: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Performance Measures

Reasons for why governments should compile and incorporate performance measures into their management process:• Measuring and reporting upon performance

promotes higher-order accountability.• SEA reports stress the significance of achieving

objectives but traditional statements stress the importance of budgetary compliance.

• SEA measures are consistent with the purposes of financial reporting, nature of government and non-profit organizations.

• SEA reporting provides sound budgeting and administration.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

18

Page 19: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

SEA Indicators

• Measures of efforts: o resources applied to a service.

• Measures of accomplishment: o include both outputs and outcomes

• Measures that relate efforts to accomplishment: o include efficiency measures o Cost-outcome measures

• GASB concepts statements emphasize that these 3 types of data be supplemented with explanatory information that can help users to understand the measures.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

19

Page 20: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Limitations of SEA

SEA measures:• Are unlikely to indicate entity’s true

accomplishments apart from the stated objectives.• They don’t provide a measure to find out if the

objectives are really worth achieving. • Since accomplishments can not be described by a

single measure, SEA might have to provide several measures.

• SEA data do not take into account different operating conditions and therefore, might not provide sufficient information to enable meaningful comparisons.

• Comparisons over time within the same organization can be deceptive if the conditions change.

• SEA data can be easily under-or over-aggregated.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

20

Page 21: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Audits of SEA Reports

• AICPA has separate standards for attesting to nonfinancial assertions.

• Auditors:ocould be required to assess the adequacy of the

informationoverify if the data provided are reliable oEvaluate whether they are fairly presented.

• This could require auditors to review the entity’s internal control systems and test selected transactions.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

21

Page 22: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Capital Expenditures

• Both government and non-profits acquire capital assets.

• They are costly and hence have long-term impact on operating costs and results.

• Capital assets provide benefits over more than a year and hence capital acquisitions are better financed with debt rather than with operating revenues.

• The amount of debt that can be issued is always limited by legal debt limitations.

• A project that needs to be financed should compete for funds with other projects that will be financed from the same pool of resources.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

22

Page 23: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Capital Expenditures (cont’d)

• Capital improvement program (CIP): oentity’s long-term schedule of capital acquisitions.oCommonly associated with infrastructure assets,

such as buildings, roads, and airports etc.

• Capital budgeting and programming are carried in 2 stages: (1) individual projects are screened to determine if

they should be undertaken by conducting cost-benefit analysis.

(2) projects are ranked.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

23

Page 24: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Capital Expenditures (cont’d)

• CIP enables an organization to sharpen its focus on capital outlays.

• Government and non-profit assets do not usually provide cash inflow but they still need service and maintenance.

• But there is a risk of failing to account for operating and maintenance costs associated with the newly purchased assets.

• Risk of overlooking maintenance costs can be minimized by incorporating an itemization of anticipated additional operating costs into the benefit-cost analysis. G

rano

f &

Khu

maw

ala-

6e C

hapt

er

15

24

Page 25: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Benefit-Cost Analysis

• Business Vs. Governments and Non-profits:• For business, benefits are cash flows• For governments and non-profits, benefits are drawn

from their own operational objectives.• Benefit-cost analysis is used to enhance the

objectivity of decision making. • By no means can it eliminate the role of informed

judgment.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

25

Page 26: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Benefit-Cost Analysis (cont’d)

• Governments and non-profits undertake projects that extend the length, or enhance the quality, of human lives.

• The benefits of available options are not always the same.

• It is not easy to place a dollar value on human lives or happiness. Future earning capacity is an approach that is used in placing an economic value on human life.

Ex: cost of purchasing an additional ambulance vs. the value of human lives it might save.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

15

26

Page 27: Chapter 15 Granof & Khumawala-6e Chapter 15 1 Managing for Results.

Summary• Accountants play a vital role in all phases of the

management cycle.• Although operational objectives ideally should

represent true ends, organizations usually express their objectives as outputs rather than outcomes due to practical difficulties.

• Organizations face significant difficulties in establishing operational objectives.

• Program budgeting ensures that all expenditures are justified in relation to the objectives.

• Governments and non-profits must provide information about their service efforts and accomplishments.

• One of the disadvantages of evaluating capital expenditures apart from operating expenditures is that it is operating costs are usually overlooked.

Gra

nof

& K

hum

awal

a-6e

Cha

pter

1

5

27