Creating Sustaining Competitive Advantage Collaborative Systems
Chapter 14: Sustaining Competitive Advantage AEC 422 Fall 2012 Unit 5: Building and Sustaining...
-
Upload
homer-casey -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Chapter 14: Sustaining Competitive Advantage AEC 422 Fall 2012 Unit 5: Building and Sustaining...
Chapter 14:Sustaining Competitive
Advantage
AEC 422 Fall 2012
Unit 5: Building and Sustaining Competitive Advantage
Monday, November 5
Reminder: Competitive Advantage and Value Creation A firm has a competitive advantage in a market if it
earns a higher rate of economic profit than the average firm in the same industry
Profitability is determined by market effects (Porter’s five forces) and positioning effects (ability to create economic value through cost or benefit leadership)
Consonance analysis projects the firm’s prospects for creating value in the future, as a function of changes in demand, technical progress, threats from other firms in the industry and from other industries
Static vs. Dynamic Economies
Preferences (trends, income, demography, knowledge)
Scientific discoveries, technical change, capital and knowledge accumulation
Natural resources discovery and attrition Institutions and government regulation (the
“rules of the game”) General business conditions (business cycle,
interest rate, exchange rate, globalization) Low-probability extreme events (Katrina/Sandy,
drought)
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Examples The “old world” wine model – use expertise and
limited supply to limit barriers to entry for the premium wine segment
Nest Fresh Eggs –
Dean Foods –
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Examples The “old world” wine model – use expertise and
limited supply to limit barriers to entry for the premium wine segment
Nest Fresh Eggs– build on unique production knowledge – trying to integrate cause clarification into marketing, production contracts
Dean Foods –
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Examples The “old world” wine model – use expertise and limited
supply to limit barriers to entry for the premium wine segment
Nest Fresh Eggs– build on unique production knowledge – trying to integrate cause clarification into marketing, production contracts
Dean Foods – lower cost through scale/scope efficiencies (R&D, mgmt) but pursue product extensions and food segmentation expertise through branding, tapered integration
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Examples Monforte Dairy-
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Examples Whole Foods -
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Examples Whole Foods –
Pursue benefit leadership through superior local sourcing (that other retailers can’t source)
Build loyalty (core) by integrating social awareness into full range of products
Design store “experience” to support values-chain marketing; superior HR program
Pursue scale economies (such as they are) through mergers to build natural foods market share
Sustaining Competitive Advantage: Examples All of these firms are moving toward profitable
positions that, through different strategies, they can maintain (at least for awhile).
Looking for paths that are difficult for others to follow.
Threats to Profit Sustainability – Perfectly Competitive Markets Producers have the same production function,
produce the same good, and face equal input prices
Profit opportunities may arise exist in the short run due to favorable market conditions
In the long-run, entry induces an increase in industry output, which drives the price down to the point where profits are zero
Threats to Profit Sustainability – Monopolistic Competition Horizontal product differentiation Mark-up pricing (P > MC) positive operating
profit margin The entry of firms with new differentiated
products entails market share and profit losses by incumbents, up to the point where operating profits just cover fixed costs
Solution to profit sustainability: entry deterrence
Threats to Profit Sustainability in General Supplier and buyer power can erode the profits
of top firms within an industry When suppliers/buyers have market power, they
can extract profits during good (or bad) times Emergence of low-cost substitutes
Firm-Level Competitive Advantage vs. Industry-Level Performance Market forces are a threat to profits, but only up to a
point. Other forces appear to protect profitable firms Industry conditions that determine industry-wide
profitability are distinct from forces that sustain a firm’s competitive advantage
A firm may have a persistent edge over its rival despite strong internal rivalry and weak entry barriers
Firms in an industry with high entry barriers and/or price coordination may enjoy higher-than-competitive returns, but be equally profitable because it is easy for a firm to duplicate or neutralize the competitive advantage of the other firms
Sustaining competitive advantage
Competitive advantage is sustainable if it persists despite competitors’ efforts to duplicate it or neutralize it
Sustainability can be attributed to two main factors: Firms exhibit differences in their resources and
capabilities endowment, which persist over time Isolating mechanisms protect the competitive
advantage of firms
The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm A firm’s ability to create superior value
depends on its resources and capabilitiesResources: physical capital, human capital,
creative individuals, knowledge/technology, intermediate inputs, intangible assets such as brand reputation, customer base, established distribution channels
Capabilities: abilities to perform some activities better than competitors
The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm The uneven distribution of resources and
capabilities across firms explains observable differences in performance within an industry
For competitive advantage to be sustainable, it must rest on resources and capabilities that are scarce and imperfectly mobile between firms
The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm Why are some resources/capabilities
imperfectly mobile across firms?Non-tradable inputs/location-specific inputs
(Customer base; KY Bourbon, Napa Valley wine, Roquefort cheese, etc.)
Relationship-specific inputsCo-specialized inputsProprietary processes
Isolating Mechanisms
Isolating mechanisms are to a firm what an entry barrier is to an industry Isolating mechanisms prevent other firms from
acquiring the resources and developing the capabilities that would allow them to duplicate or neutralize the competitive advantage of a firm
Impediments to imitation Early-mover advantages
Impediments to Imitation
Legal restrictions Imitation is limited by legal restrictions protecting
intellectual property: patents, copyrights, and trademarks
Government regulatory policies controlling entry into markets: licensing, quotas on operating rights (ex. Tobacco quotas), and certification
Acquiring a patent or an operating right in the open market will not lead to economic profits unless the firm can deploy the asset in superior ways (through superior capabilities or complementary resources)
Impediments to Imitation
Superior access to inputs or customers Firms often achieve favorable access to inputs by
controlling the sources of supply through ownership or long-term exclusive contracts
Firms can prevent rivals from accessing retail distribution channels through the use of exclusive dealing clauses
Again, securing access to inputs or customers may not lead to competitive advantage as the price of locations or contracts that give the firm control of scarce inputs or distribution channels would be bid up until extra profits are captured by their original owners
Impediments to Imitation
Market size and scale economies Imitation (by existing firms and entrants) may be
deterred when the minimum efficient scale is large relative to the market demand and one firm has secured a large share of the market
Examples in the bio-tech industries: equine drugs, pesticides for minor-use crops (avocados, tangerines), GMO crops for developing countries
Impediments to Imitation
Intangible barriers to imitationThe basis of the firm’s advantage lies in
distinctive organizational capabilitiesCausal ambiguityDependence on historical circumstancesSocial complexity
Impediments to Imitation
Causal ambiguityTacit/non-codified knowledge/capabilitiesTacit capabilities are typically developed
through trial and error, refined through practice and experience
It is difficult to transfer superior tacit capabilities from one location/business to another
Rationale for proprietary information, non-disclosure agreements, non-compete clauses
Impediments to Imitation
Dependence on historical circumstancesFirms take strategic actions in order to adapt
to the constraints of their business environment; different firms are subject to a different set of constraints, and thus develop different capabilities over time
Historical dependence implies that a firm’ strategy may be viable for only a limited time
Impediments to Imitation
Social complexityPrice-based market exchanges vs. long-term
relationships; interpersonal relations among a firm’s managers, and with suppliers and customers
Examples: relationships between Toyota and its suppliers; education, dentist, car mechanic, etc.
Early-Mover Advantage
Learning curveA firm that has produced more output than its
competitors in earlier periods has moved farther down the learning curve and is able to produce at a lower unit cost
Dynamic effect: lower unit cost lower price greater cumulative output …
Example: bio-tech industries
Early-Mover Advantage
Reputation and buyer uncertainty In the case of experience goods, consumers who
have had a positive experience with a firm’s brand will be reluctant to switch to competing brands if there is a chance that their products fail to satisfy them early mover advantage (ex.: Maker’s Mark, Mondavi)
Pioneering brands can influence the formation of consumers’ preferences, and consumers may consider the attributes of a pioneer brand the ideal for a certain type of product early mover advantage
Technology, marketing/advertising and other factors can narrow the effective and/or perceived quality gap between early-mover brands and later-comer brands (private labels for instance)
Early-Mover Advantage
Buyer switching costsSwitching costs can confer a substantial
advantage to an early moverBut a firm that has created switching costs for
established customers may be at a disadvantage competing for new customers because if it cuts prices to attract them, the profit margin on sales to its loyal customers also declines
Early-Mover Advantage
Network effects A product exhibits network effects when its value to
consumers increases with the number of consumers using it
Actual networks/virtual networks and the role of complementary products
The first firm that can establish a large installed base of customers in a market with network effects obtains a sustainable competitive advantage (ex.: Chicago agricultural futures and options markets)
Remarks
Business opportunities don’t last forever Sometimes success cannot be imitated easily
because it is due to luck or trivial circumstances Sure is good to know what keeps you ahead of
your competition
Preview of the Monsanto Case
Shift in strategic positioning, from an agricultural chemical products based business (Roundup) to a biological products based firm (GMO)
Superior value creation: plant-made pharmaceutical molecules, feed and processing use value enhancement, Roundup incremental improvement
Capabilities expansion through strategic alliances with seed companies and other agribusinesses
Early mover in the plant biotechnology industry and the use of molecular breeding to create new commercial varieties
Learning and scope economies in R&D intensive activities, patenting high barriers to imitation by rivals
Preview of the Monsanto Case
Historical circumstances: profits from the agricultural chemical business unit allowed Monsanto to invest heavily in biotech R&D
Response to changes in energy markets’ fundamentals