Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

17
Urban Geography: overview Created by David Palmer Eaglecrest High School

Transcript of Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Page 1: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Urban Geography: overview

Created by David Palmer

Eaglecrest High School

Page 2: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Chapter 12 Key Issue 3

Created by David Palmer & Adapted by Megan Leach

Page 3: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

System of cities with various levels

Few cities at top level

Increasing number of settlements at each

lower levelLarger cities provide more services than

smaller towns

– exists at regional, national, and global

scales

Urban Hierarchy

Number of Business Types by Population

of Colorado Cities (1899)

Graph from Kuby, HGIA

Page 4: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Urban Geography – Urban Systems

Page 5: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Ranking of Census MSAs (Metropolitan Statistical Areas) of U.S., 2005

MSAs with populations over 2 million (right)

24 more MSAs have pops between 1 and 2 million

47 more between 500,000 and 1 million

74 more between 250,000 and 500,000

169 more bet. 100,000 and 250,000

Page 6: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Nested hexagonal

market areaspredicted by Central Place

Theory

Central Place Theory

Spatial model of settlements (central places) for a nested hierarchy of market areas

Page 7: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Central Place Theory

• Geographic assumptions (Christaller, 1930s)- featureless landscape on infinite plane- uniform population distribution

• Behavioral (economic) assumptions- consumers shop at closest place possible- consumers do not go beyond the range of the good- market areas equal or exceed threshold of good

• Hexagonal market areas are most efficient

- non-overlapping circles leave areas unserved- higher-order central places also provide lower-order functions

Page 8: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Central Place Theory in action on a flat, featureless plain (e.g., Northern Germany)

… and in a landscape with

“locational biases” introduced by

physical features

What does Utah look like?

Page 9: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Nesting of Services and Settlements

MDCs have numerous small settlements with small thresholds and ranges, and far fewer large settlements with large thresholds and ranges.

Nesting pattern – overlapping hexagons

Page 10: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer
Page 11: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer
Page 12: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Optimal Location Within a MarketBest Location in a Linear Settlement

Gravity Model• Number of people vs. distance they travel for access

Best Location in a Non-Linear SettlementIdentify possible site

Identify potential users & measure distance

Divide users / distance to site

Select other locations & repeat steps

Select highest # (most users / location)

Page 13: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer
Page 14: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Rank-size Rule

Rank Size RuleNth largest city of a national system will be 1/n the size of the largest city.

Example - US is close to this model - not a good model for newly urbanized countries i.e. LDC

Page 15: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Primate City

One dominant city in a country or region.

There is usually not an obvious second city

Example - Paris France - 8.7 million next city Marseille - 1.2 million

Page 16: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Mexico Primate City

Mexico is an excellent example of a Primate City model.

Mexico City is dominant city in Mexico

Page 17: Chapter 12, Key 3 by David Palmer

Paris historical site and growth