Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

23
Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis
  • date post

    15-Jan-2016
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    218
  • download

    4

Transcript of Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Page 1: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Chapter 13

Inferential Data Analysis

Page 2: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Review of statistical tests

• One sample t test• Two independent samples t test• Two dependent samples t test• ANOVA• One-way Chi-Square Test• Two-way Chi-Square Test

Page 3: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Example 1

Page 4: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Ferguson, Douglas C., Chuck E. Harp, Paul A. Opler, Richard S. Peigler, Michael Pogue, Jerry A. Powell, and Michael J. Smith. 1999. Moths of North America. Jamestown, ND: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/distr/lepid/moths/mothsusa.htm (Version 12DEC2003).

Why do butterflies and moths have eye spots?

Page 5: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Research hypothesis: Eye spots are a defense against moth-eating birds.

• Experiment:– Test effect of exposure to eye-spot

patterns on behavior of moth-eating birds.

• Sample:– N=16 moth-eating birds

Page 6: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

• Method:– Test in a 2 chamber enclosure,

separated by a partition with a doorway. Birds are free to roam from chamber to chamber.

– Chamber 1 has plain walls, chamber 2 has eye-spot patterns painted on the walls.

– Birds are tested one-at-a-time by placing in the doorway in the center.

– Each bird left in box for 60 minutes.– Amount of time spent in each

chamber is recorded.

Page 7: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

What are the independent and dependent variables?

• Independent: Chamber selected

• Dependent: Amount of time spent there.

Page 8: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

What statistical test do we use?

• One sample t-test• H0: Birds show no preference for

either chamber– H0: µ = 30 (for room with spots)

• HA: Eye patterns affect behavior, but will they show avoidance or attraction?– HA: µ ne 30 (2-tailed test)

• Go to SPSS file to analyze

Page 9: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Alternative hypotheses, controls?

• Lighting in chambers• Time of day• Motivation (food deprivation)• Different or same species?

Page 10: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Example 2

Page 11: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Pharmacology example

• Assess effectiveness of new drug by noting concentration in blood and/or urine certain time points after giving

• Want to compare two types of aspirin (A and B)

Page 12: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

• Experiment:– Test clearance of each type of aspirin

one hour after it is given

• Sample:– N=10 subjects

Research hypothesis: There is no difference in the effectiveness of the

two types of aspirin

Page 13: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

• Method:– Randomly assign half the subjects to

receive aspirin A first and the other half to receive aspirin B

– Give same dosage of assigned aspirin to each subject

– Test amount of aspirin in urine 1 hour later

– One week later, after aspirin has cleared system, test each subject with the other aspirin

Page 14: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

What are the independent and dependent variables?

• Independent:– Type of aspirin

• Dependent:– Amount of aspirin in urine 1-hour later

Page 15: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

What statistical test do we use?

• Two dependent samples sample t-test• H0: No difference in amount of drug in

system– H0: µA - µB = 0

• HA: There is a difference in amount of drug in system– HA: µA - µB ne 0 (2-tailed test)

• Go to SPSS file to analyze

Page 16: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Alternative hypotheses, controls?

• Differences in subjects body composition

• Differences in subjects eating/drinking habits

• Genetic differences in pharmacological response to aspirin

Page 17: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Example 3

Page 18: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Duncker’s Candle Problem

• 2 volunteers to leave room– Haven’t had class in cognitive

psychology

Page 19: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

• Experiment:– Test length of time it takes subjects

to solve the problem.

• Sample:– N=20 subjects

Research hypothesis: It will take longer for subjects who are given

tacks in the box to solve the problem.

Page 20: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

• Method:– Randomly assign half the subjects to

get tacks in the box and half to get tacks out of the box

– Measure how much time it takes each subject to solve the problem

Page 21: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

What are the independent and dependent variables?

• Independent:– Location of tacks

• Dependent:– Amount of time to solve problem

Page 22: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

What statistical test do we use?

• Two independent samples t-test• H0: No difference between people

who get tacks in box or out of box– H0: µ1 - µ2 = 0

• HA: The group who gets the tacks in the box takes more time to solve– HA: µ1 - µ2 > 0 (1-tailed test)

• Go to SPSS file to analyze

Page 23: Chapter 12 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 13 Inferential Data Analysis.

Chapter 12Conducting & Reading

ResearchBaumgartner et al

Alternative hypotheses, controls?

• Attitude of researcher as box, tacks, candle are presented

• Differences in subjects educational background/IQ

• Differences in subjects age/gender