Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument
-
Upload
jameson-castaneda -
Category
Documents
-
view
26 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument
Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author’s Argument
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 2
Author’s Argument
An author’s argument is the opinion or belief that he or she wants to persuade readers to believe.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 3
Identify the Issue
Issue means the controversial topic the author is discussing.
Controversial issues on ones on which people disagree. Examples of controversial issues include the death penalty, gun control, foreign policy, and abortion.
Ask yourself, “Is the author writing about a controversial issue?”
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 4
Determine the Author’s Argument
The author’s argument is his or her point of view on an issue.
Ask yourself, “What is the author’s position on the issue?”
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 5
Step 1: Identify the Author’s Assumptions
An author’s assumptions consist of things the author takes for granted without presenting any proof (in other words, what the author believes or accepts as true and bases the argument on).
Ask yourself, “What does the author take for granted?”If the author’s assumptions are illogical or incorrect, the entire argument will be flawed. Readers may be misled unless they identify the author’s assumptions.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 6
Step 2: Identify the Types of Support
Types of support refers to the kind of evidence the author uses to back up the argument.
Ask yourself, “What kind of support does the author present to back the argument?”
Support can include research findings, case studies, personal experience or observation, examples, facts, comparisons, expert testimony and opinions.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 7
Step 3: Determine the Relevance of the Support
Relevance means the support is directly related to the argument.
Ask yourself, “Is the support directly related to the argument?”
Unless the author is an expert, his or her opinion or personal experience may not be particularly relevant.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 8
Step 4: Determine the Author’s Objectivity
The author’s argument has objectivity when the support consists of facts and other clear evidence.
Ask yourself, “Does the author present facts and clear evidence as support?”
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 9
Step 5: Determine the Argument’s CompletenessAn argument is complete if the author presents adequate support and overcomes opposing points.
Sometimes authors do not give enough support.
Sometimes they leave out information that would weaken their argument. Their argument would be stronger if they presented it and countered it.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 10
Step 6: Determine if the Argument Is Valid
An argument is valid (has validity) if it is logical.
Ask yourself, “Is the argument logical (well-reasoned)?”
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 11
Step 7: Decide if the Argument Is Credible
An argument has credibility if it is believable (convincing).
Ask yourself, “Is the author’s argument believable?”
Validity and credibility are closely related since an argument that is not valid will not be credible.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 12
The Edge: Pointers from the Coach
Don’t become overwhelmed because there are several steps in evaluating an author’s argument.
Watch out for your own biases when you evaluate an author’s argument.
Authors do not have to prove conclusively that their argument is correct. After all, not everything can be proved. They must, however, present an argument that is well-reasoned and well-supported.
© 2008 McGraw-Hill Higher Education Chapter 11: Evaluating an Author's Argument 13
The Edge (continued)
There are several ways author’s try to manipulate readers into buying their argument. These are called propaganda techniques.
After you have read an author’s argument, go back through it. Mark the argument and each piece of support.