CHAPTER 1 MARKETING EXPENSES AND FINANCIAL...
Transcript of CHAPTER 1 MARKETING EXPENSES AND FINANCIAL...
1
CHAPTER 1
MARKETING EXPENSES AND FINANCIAL
PERFORMANCE
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Holistic marketing incorporates performance marketing and understanding the returns
to the business from marketing programs, as well as addressing broader concerns and
their Legal, ethical, social, and environmental effects. Top management is going
beyond sales revenue to examine the marketing scorecard and interpret what is
happening to market share, customer loss rate, customer satisfaction, products quality,
and other measures.
1.2 PERFORMANCE MARKETING THROUGH ROMI
Return on Marketing Investment (ROMI) and Marketing ROI are defined as the
optimization of marketing spend for the short and long term in support of the brand
strategy by building a market model using valid, objective marketing metrics.
Improving ROMI leads to improved marketing effectiveness, increased revenue,
profit and market share for the same amount of marketing spend. There are two forms
of the Return on Marketing Investment (ROMI) metric. The first, short term ROMI, is
also used as a simple index measuring the dollars of revenue (or market share,
contribution margin or other desired outputs) for every dollar of marketing spend. In a
similar way the second ROMI concept, long term ROMI, can be used to determine
other less tangible aspects of marketing effectiveness. For example, ROMI could be
used to determine the incremental value of marketing as it pertains to increased brand
awareness, consideration or purchase intent. In this way both the longer term value of
marketing activities (incremental brand awareness, etc.) and the shorter term revenue
and profit can be determined. This is a sophisticated metric that balances marketing
and business analytics and is used increasingly by many of the world's leading
organizations (Hewlett-Packard and Procter & Gamble to name two) to measure the
economic (that is, cash-flow derived) benefits created by marketing investments. For
many other organizations, this method offers a way to prioritize investments and
allocate marketing and other resources on a scientific basis.
2
1.2.1 Challenge of Return on Marketing Investment
Marketing ROI is critical to any organization, especially business to business and
smaller consumer companies. Without a significant return on marketing investment,
the sales organization will not operate effectively, the company won't meet its'
objectives. How does marketing answer the question when the CEO asks? “Why
should I invest in marketing when I can get better results by hiring more
salespeople?” Is marketing responsible for delivering brand awareness, flashy
graphics and great marketing programs? Or is it responsible to deliver leads and
shorten the sales cycle to generate revenue at a cost and risk in line with other
investments that a company might make?
1.2.2 Metrics Linking Marketing to Financial Performance
Traditionally, marketers concentrated their attention on customer or product-market
results, such as awareness, attitude, sales, market share, brand equity, and customer
satisfaction. They focused on the short-term effects of marketing variables, rather than
long-term effects, and they rarely considered the link to financial outcomes and stock
price. However, changes in the business environment have led to an increased
emphasis on financial accountability for expenditures. Reflecting this shift, the
Marketing Science Institute has designated metrics, or marketing productivity — that
is, the measurement of the impact of marketing on financial outcomes — a first-tier
priority for the past six years.
It is needed to clarify the ways marketing activities build shareholder value. For
example, when we talk of marketing “investment,” we must identify the marketing
assets in which we invest and understand how the assets contribute to profits in the
short run and provide potential for growth and sustained profits in the long run. In this
context, the spotlight is not on underlying products, pricing, or customer relationships
(see Webster 1992) but on marketing expenditures (e.g., marketing communications,
promotions, other activities) and how these expenditures influence marketplace
performance. The firm should have a business model that tracks how marketing
expenditures influence what customers know, believe, and feel, and ultimately how
they behave. These intermediate outcomes are usually measured by nonfinancial
measures such as attitudes and behavioural intentions. The central problem we
address in this article is how nonfinancial measures of marketing effectiveness drive
3
conclusions. Although changing customer attitudes, perceptions, and intentions are
important, and achieving improved sales and market share is essential to any
marketing effort, many managers consider financial impact the most crucial measure
of success for any marketing effort. Financial impact involves not only the increase in
revenues but also the expenditure required to produce that increase. Marketing
expenditures are considered investments, and the financial return is measured as ROI.
The long-standing recognition of the importance of ROI in evaluating more general
marketing expenditures (Kirpalani and Shapiro 1973) led to early methods for
measuring advertising ROI (Dhalla 1976). The connection between marketing efforts
and financial performance was subsequently reinforced by analysis of the PIMS
company database, which indicated a positive relationship between market share and
the firm’s aggregate return on net assets (Buzzell and Gale 1987), though that
relationship was later challenged on methodological grounds (Jacobson and Aaker
1985). Gale (1994) recanted and later proposed that market share and financial
performance were both driven by product quality, though the link between perceived
and actual quality is itself complex.
More recently, the “return on quality” model has provided a methodology for
projecting a firm’s ROI in service quality (Rust, Zahorik, and Keiningham 1994,
1995). Research has shown that there may be trade-offs between service quality
improvements that increase revenue and those that reduce costs (Anderson, Fornell,
and Rust 1997; Rust, Moorman, and Dickson 2002). Approaches to evaluating
financial return have also begun to consider the element of financial risk (Davis 2002;
Hogan et al. 2002), as is common in corporate finance.
Marketers are thus being increasingly asked to justify their investments to senior
management in financial and profitability terms, as well as in terms of building and
brand and growing the customer base. As a consequence, they are employing a border
variety of financial measures to assess the direct and indirect value their marketing
efforts create. They are also recognizing that much of their firms’ market value comes
from intangible assets, particularly their brands, customers base, employees,
distributor and supplier relations, and intellectual capital.
1.3
4
WHAT IS METRIC?
A metric is a measuring system that quantifies a trend, dynamic, or characteristics. In
virtually all disciplines, practitioners use metrics to explain phenomena, diagnose
causes, share findings and project the results of future events. Throughout the worlds
of science, business, and government, metrics encourage rigor and objectivity. They
make it possible to compare observations across regions and time periods. They
facilitate understandings and collaboration.
1.4 WHY DO WE NEED METRICS?
Loard Kelvin, a British physicist and the manager of the laying of the first successful
transatlantic cable, was one of history’s great advocates for quantitative investigation.
In his day, however, mathematical rigor had not yet spread widely beyond the worlds
of science, engineering, and finance. Much has changed since then.
Today, numerical fluency is a crucial skill for every business leader. Managers must
quantify market opportunities and competitive threats. They must justify the financial
risk and benefits of their decisions. They must evaluate plans, explain variances,
judge performance, and identify leverage points for improvements- all in numeric
terms. These responsibilities require a strong command of measurements and of the
systems and formulas that generate them. In short, they required metrics. Managers
must select, calculate, and explain key business metrics. They must understand how
each is constructed and how to use it in decisions making.
1.5 MARKETING METRICS: OPPORTUNITIES, PERFORMANCE, AND
ACCOUNTABILITY
Today, marketers must understand their addressable markets quantitatively. They
must measure new opportunities and the investment needed to realize them. Marketers
must quantify the value of products, customers, and distribution channels- all under
various pricing and promotional scenarios. Increasingly, marketers are held
accountable for the financial ramifications of their decisions.
The numeric imperative represents a challenge, however. In business and economics,
many metrics are complex and difficult to master. Some are highly specialized and
best suited to specific analyses. Many require data that may be approximate,
5
incomplete, or unavailable.
Under this circumstance, no single metrics is likely to be perfect. For this reason, we
recommend that marketers use a portfolio or “dashboard” of metrics. By doing so,
they can view market dynamics from various perspective and arrive at “triangulated”
strategies and solution. Additionally, with multiple metrics, marketers can use each as
a check on the others. In this way, they can maximize the accuracy of their
knowledge. They can also estimates or project one data point on the basis of others.
Of course, to use multiple metrics effectively, marketers must appreciate the relation
between them and the limitations inherent in each. When this understanding is
achieved, however, metrics can help a firm maintain a productive focus on customers
and markets. They can help managers identify the strengths and weaknesses in both
strategies and execution. Mathematically defined and widely disseminated, metrics
can become part of precise, operational language within a firm. A further challenge in
metrics stems from wide variations in the availability of data between industries and
geographies. Recognizing these variations, we have tried to suggest alternative
sources and procedures for estimating some of the metrics in this book. Fortunately,
although both the range and type of marketing metrics may very between countries,
these differences are shrinking rapidly. Ambler, for example, report that performance
metrics have become a common language marketers, and that they are now used to
rally terms and benchmark efforts internationally.
1.6 MEASURING ADVERTISING EFFECTIVENESS
There may be disagreement to the statement that all advertising works, whether it is
good or bad, tasteful or vulgar, gentle or browbeating, verbal or visual, written by
professionals or composed by amateurs. This statement will receive the most fervent
nod or approval from people who dislike advertising can manipulate the public. But
all these people are wrong. Individuals who have spent time practicing the advertising
art, especially those who have been concerned with conducting business that depend
on the effectiveness of advertising, know perfectly well that advertising produce very
patchy results-sometimes good, sometimes neutral, sometimes even negative.
Experience of Practitioners indicate that advertising has a high failure rate.
How much advertising works? One can answer this fairly precisely on the basis of
much research carried out in developed advertising markets – the United States,
6
Britain, Germany, France, and Scandinavia. The most remarkable conclusion from
this research is the consistency of the patterns of success and failure. There is
evidence of hidden harmonies between how advertising works in different countries—
harmonies that go far beyond the simple and obvious (but sometimes fallacious)
claims made by the proponents of global advertising campaigns. Measurement of the
advertising effectiveness is necessary before to quantify how much of this works. The
difficulty or course is to find out how to include the effects of all the other factors that
influence sales of brand. These include seasonal sales patterns, various types of trade
promotion, display and other distributional stimuli, and-most importantly-the negative
effects of advertising and other activities for competitive brands.
1.7 MARKETING MANAGEMENT
A study of the evolution of marketing brings forth its development into a management
function using various advanced techniques for achieving specific objectives.
Marketing management encompasses the entire range of activities, from the
identification of business opportunities in the customer needs to the customer
satisfaction through consumption of goods or services, leading to fulfillment of the
need.
1.7.1 Definition
"American Management Association" has adopted the following definition of
marketing management: "Marketing (management) is the process of planning and
executing the conception, pricing, promotion and distribution of goods, service, and
ideas to create exchanges with target groups that satisfy customer and organisational
objectives."
1.7.2 Functions of Marketing Management
Marketing management comprises four key functional aspects, viz., Analysis,
Planning, Implementation and Control.
(a) Analysis: There is a need to understand customers, competitors, trends and
changes in the environment and internal strengths and weaknesses for drawing out
effective marketing plans. This requires collection of information related to these
areas using systematic marketing research and marketing information systems, and
7
scientific analysis of the data.
(b) Planning: It covers both strategic planning for the long-term marketing direction
of the firm (for example, selection of target markets), and marketing programmes and
tactics to be used to support the strategic plans. The plans should include the goals
and targets in measurable terms, and also the estimates of resources, and the actions
required for their implementation.
(c) Implementation: The implementation of strategic and tactical plans requires
staffing, allocation of tasks and responsibilities, budgeting, and securing financial and
other resources needed.
(d) Control: Measurement and evaluation of progress against the goals and targets
spelt out in the plans is an important function for determining the future course of
action. This may prove to be problematic due to difficulties in measuring the
performance criteria and ascertaining the cause and effect. It is a complex function
requiring use of both qualitative and quantitative techniques including budgetary
control, control of marketing mix, and even marketing audit.
1.8 BANK MARKETING
We define bank marketing as follows: 'Bank marketing is the aggregate of function,
directed at providing services to satisfy customers financial (and other related) needs
and wants, more effectively and efficiently than the competitors keeping in view the
organizational objectives of the bank.” Bank marketing is the 'aggregate of function,'
which signify the totality of the marketing activity. This aggregate of functions
it the sum tool of all individual/ whisks consisting of an integrated effort to
discover, create, arouse and satisfy customer needs. This means, without
exception, that each individual working in the bank is a marketing person who
contributes to the total satisfaction to customers and the bank should ultimately
develop customer orientation among all the personnel of the bank.
Bank marketing deals with providing services to satisfy customers' financial needs
and wants. Banks have to find out the financial needs of the customers and offer
the senior which can satisfy those needs. Banks may also require to satisfy the
customers’ financial and other related needs and wants. The individuals and
corporate bodies have certain needs in relation to money commodity. To satisfy that
8
financial needs. Customers want specific serial. Different banks offer different
benefits by offering various schemes which can take care of the wants of the
customers.
Marketing helps in achieving the organizational objectives of the bank. This
mean, that marketing is equally applicable to achieve commercial and social
objectives of the banks. Indian banks have dual organizational objectives of the
banks. Indian banks have dual organizational objectives-commercial objective
to make profit and social objective which us a development role, particularly in
the rural areas. Service area approach adopted recently by the Indian banks is a
marketing approach whereby a specific mega market is assigned to each bank branch
and after identification of the needs of the customer all efforts of the bank are required
to be concentrated to tacitly the customers to achieve the bank's social objectives.
Hence, the marketing concept is essentially about the following few things which
contribute towards bank's success:
(a) The bank cannot min without the customers
(b) The purse of the bank is to create, win, and keep a customer. The customer is and
should be the central Focus of everything the bank does.
(c) It is alto a way of organizing the bank. The starting point for organizational
design should be the customer and the bank should ensure that the services are
preformed and delivered in the most effective way. Service facilities also should
be designed for customers’ convenience.
(d) Ultimate aim of a bank is to deliver total satisfaction to the customer.
(e) Customer satisfaction is affected by the performance of all the personnel of the
bank.
All the techniques and strategies of marketing are used so that ultimately they induce
the people to do business with a particular bank. To create and keep a customer
means doing all those things so that people would like to do business and continue to
do it with a particular bank rather than with the competitors. It cannot stay in
business if it does not attract and hold enough customers, no matter how efficiently it
operates.
9
Marketing is an organizational philosophy. This philosophy demands the satisfaction
of customers’ (consumers) needs as the prerequisite for the existence and survival of
the bank. Marketing is so basic that it cannot be considered as a separate function. It
is the whole business seen from the point of view of its final result that is the
customer’s point of view.
Marketing for service industry like banks is a philosophy to be understood by the
whole organization-from the chief executive to the person waiting at the counter. The
first and most important step in applying the marketing concept is to have a whole
hearted commitment to customer orientation by all the employees. Marketing is an
attitude of mind. This means that the central focus of all the activities of a bank is
customer. Marketing is not a separate function for banks. The marketing function in
Indian bank is required to be integrated with operation.
The potential danger in introducing traditional marketing department as a mean, of
managing services marketing was tested in a study of executives of service firms. The
result of the study clearly indicated that “a separate marketing department may widen
the gap between marketing and operation”.
A traditional marketing department (and officers with marketing designations) usually
cannot be responsible for the total marketing function of a service organisation like
banks. Introduction of such marketing department may easily influence the bank in an
unfavourable direction. Personnel working in other departments like operations and
back of the counters stop worrying about their customers-related responsibilities and
totally concentrate on just handling operations and other ditties mechanically.
The reason for this is clear. They feel that the bank now has marketing specialists and
hence they need not bother about customer related responsibilities any longer. Some
Indian banks have started marketing department which takes are of deposit maim
(deposit mobilisation) function only. In most of the cases it is a new name given to the
old deposit mobilisation department. Functions remain the same with somewhat more
promotional activities. One bank appointed about 50 marketing officer, at branch
level for deposit mobilisation. The experiment is not successful and they are
withdrawn from the branch and position is abolished. Banks may not require this type
of separate positions. Branch manager and counter desks themselves are the
marketing persons.
10
Marketing is much more than just advertising and promotion; it is a basic part of total
business operation. What it required for the bank it the market orientation and
customer consciousness among all the personnel of the bank. For developing
marketing philosophy and marketing culture, a bank may require a marketing
coordinator or integrator at the head office reporting directly to the Chief Executive
for effective coordination of different functions, such as marketed research, training,
public relations, advertising and business development to ensure customer
satisfaction. The Executive Director (ED) is the most suitable person to do this
coordination work effectively in the Indian public sector banks though ultimately the
Chief Executive is responsible for the total marketing function. Hence, the total
marketing function involves the following:
(a) Market research i.e., identification of customers' financial needs and wants and
forecasting and researching future financial market needs and competitors' activities.
(b) Product development i.e., appropriate products to meet consume& financial needs.
(c) Pricing atilt service i.e., promotional activities and distribution system in
accordance with the guidelines and rules of the Reserve Bank of India and at the same
time looking for opportunities to satisfy the customers better.
(d) Developing market orientation i.e., marketing culture — among all the customer-
consciousness 'Personnel' of the bank through training.
Thus, it is important to recognise the fundamentally different functions that bank
marketing has to perform. Since the banks have to attract deposits and attract users of
funds and other services, marketing problems are more complex in banks than in other
commercial concerns.
1.9 IMPORTANCE OF MARKETING FOR INDIAN BANKS
Banking organizations are newcomers to marketing. It was the banks in the UK and
US, which were the first to begin applying the marketing concepts during the 1960s.
In India, the banking industry has passed through major transformations during the
twentieth century. At the time of independence, India had 558 commercial banks, of
which 459 were non-scheduled banks. The Imperial Bank of India was converted into
State Bank of India in 1955 and was given the mandate to cover the rural areas, cater
11
to the needs of agriculture and small-scale industries, besides serving as agent of
Reserve Bank of India in places, where it did not have offices. In 1967, the number of
banks was reduced to ninety-one, due to several liquidations and amalgamations
followed by nationalization of fourteen major banks of the country in 1969. Indian
banking system transformed itself from class banking to mass banking. The banks
promoted the banking services to inculcate the banking habits among the public. It
indeed was a situation, which illustrated the relevance of marketing in a monopolistic
situation. During the 1970s, the number of bank branches of public sector banks
increased at a very rapid pace. As a result, the banks started feeling the competitive
forces especially in the urban areas. Besides, in the 1980s there were other changes
like development of small savings instruments, corporate sector more tapping the
primary market through public deposit, equity shares and debentures. The bank thus
faced competition both on the assets and liabilities fronts. At that point, the need for
marketing was realised not only by the individual banks but at the banking industry
level. In his statement at the AGM, in April, 1987, the ten chairman of the Indian
Banks’ Association, Mr. M.N. Gopiporia said, “The relevance of aggressive
marketing in banks has come to the fore as never before. The banking system in the
country has built-up a vast infrastructure, at a substantial cost and unless aggressive
efforts are made to market their deposit and credit scheme, as well as the wide range
of facilities and services offered, there could be under-utilization of the banking
infrastructure.”
The following decade saw the Indian banking witness another major transformation
— the emergence of liberalization process that brought about two most eventful
changes. One, the regulatory framework for banks which was highly restrictive, was
changed into a rigorous but broader control system. Two, the banking sector reopened
to the private sector. Hence, while the banks got more freedom, they also had newer
forces to reckon with.
In it retrospect, it is seen that the banks, after nationalization, had the necessity of
catering to a wide spectrum of customers, with different needs. They responded by
developing a new range of services. Although the customer orientation as a marketing
concept was talked about at a much later stage, the bank management displayed
marketing acumen in their practices. The largest bank of the country, State Bank of
India, reorganized itself in 1970s, on the lines of market segments, viz., commercial
12
and institutional, small industries and small business, agriculture and personal; and
having a distinct development wing which had the primary function of marketing. As
the economy developed and the customers were exposed to the sophisticated products
offered by the banks abroad, the banks in India were faced with the demand for
similar products. The banks have, therefore, to be continuously acquiring the
capabilities for and have to be innovative in offering new varied services.
One major cause for concern for the banks has been their profitability. The social
responsibilities thrust upon them, which also required them to extend their network in
remote rural areas rendering such branches non-viable, affected their bottom lines
adversely. Evolving suitable strategies for improving the profitability, particularly in
the deregulated and liberalized environment is one major challenge, and it
underscores the need for marketing for banking organizations.
The new generation private sector banks started with technologically superior systems
and took to aggressive marketing of their products. They started segmenting the
customer base and offered products suitable to each segment.
The entry of new generation private sector banks in India has inter-alia brought to the
fore two major aspects. One, the use of information technology for delivery of
banking services, which has not only affected the banking products but also facilitated
new outlets, for example, ATMs, Internet, etc. Two, it renewed focus on the high net
worth customer, which has created a different type of private banking in the Indian
banks. This proved to be a catalyst, which brought into play a rapid reaction across
the entire banking sector. The computerization of bank branches took place at fast
pace thereafter not only among the public sector banks, but even among the old
private sector banks and cooperative banks. These developments have underlined the
marketing orientation of banks. The banks are now not only conscious of the customer
needs but are focused on customer relations management.
1.10 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
The number of customers or percentage of total customers, whose reported experience
with a firm, its products, or its services (ratings) exceeds specified satisfaction goals.
Within organization, customer satisfaction rating can have powerful effects. They
focus employees on the importance of fulfilling customers’ expectations.
13
Furthermore, when ‘these ratings dip, they warn of problems that can affect sales and
profitability.
A second important metric related to satisfaction is willingness to recommend. When
a customer is satisfied with a product, he or she might recommend it to friends,
relatives, and colleagues. This can be a powerful marketing advantage.
Customer satisfaction data are among the most frequently collected indicators of
market perceptions. Their principal uses it twofold.
1. Within organizations, the collections, analysis, and dissemination of these data
send a message about the importance of tending to customers and ensuring
that they have a positive experience with the company’s good and services.
2. Although sales or market share can indicate how well a firm is performing
currently, satisfaction is perhaps the best indicator of how likely it is that the
firm’s customer will make further purchases in the future. Much research has
focused on the relationship between customer satisfaction and relation.
Studies indicate that the ramifications of satisfaction are most strongly realized
at the extremes. On the scale in figure 1. Individual who rate their satisfaction
level as”5”are likely to become return customer and might even evangelize for
the firm. Individuals who rate their satisfaction level as “1”, by contrast, are
unlikely to return. Further they can hurt the firm by making negative.
Comments about it to prospective customers. Willingness or recommended is
a key metrics relating to customer satisfaction.
These metrics quantify an important dynamic. When a brand has loyal customers, it
gains positive word-of-mouth marketing, which is both free and highly effective.
Customer satisfaction is measured at the individual level, but it is almost always
reported at an aggregate level. It can be, and often is, measured along various
dimensions. A hotel, for example, might ask customers to rate their experience with
its front desk and check-in service, with the room, with the amenities in the room,
with the restaurants, and so on. Additionally, in a holistic sense, the hotel might ask
about overall satisfaction “with your stay”.
14
1.11 INTRODUCTION OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
There are many different ways to measure financial performance, but all measures
should be taken in aggregation. Line items such as revenue from operations, operating
income or cash flow from operations can be used, as well as total unit sales.
Furthermore, the analyst or investor may wish to look deeper into financial
statements and seek out margin growth rates or any declining debt, measuring the
results of a firm's policies and operations in monetary terms. These results are
reflected in the firm's return on investment, return on assets, value added, etc.
Financial analysis also refers to the financial statement analysis or accounting
analysis. Therefore, the knowledge about financial statement is necessary.
1.12 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A financial statement is an organized collection of date according to logical and
consistent accounting procedures. Its purpose is to convey an understanding of some
financial aspects of a business firm. It may show a position at a moment, of time as in
the case of balance sheet, or may reveal a series of activities over a given period of
time, as in the case of an income statement.
Accounting is the process of identifying, measuring and communicating economic
information to permit informed judgments and decision by users of the information. It
involves recording, classifying and summarizing various business transactions. The
end products of business transactions are the financial statements comprising
primarily the position statement or the balance sheet and the income statement or the
profit and loss account. These statements are the outcome of summarizing process of
accounting and the financial position of a concern. Financial statements are the basis
for decision making by the management as well as other outsiders who are invested in
the affairs of the firm such as investors, creditors, customers, suppliers, financial
institutions, employees, potential investors, government and the general public. The
analysis and interpretation of financial statements depend up on the nature and type of
information available in these statements.
15
1.13 TYPES AND SIGNIFICANCE OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial statements are broadly groped in to two statements. 1. Income statements (trading, profit and loss account)
2. Balance Sheets.
In addition to above financial statements supported by the following statement are
prepared to meet the needs of the business concern.
3. Statement of retained earnings.
4. Statement of changes in financial position.
Figure 1.1: Financial Statements
1.14 OBJECTIVES OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following are the important objectives of the financial statements:
1. To provide adequate information about the source of finance and obligation of the
finance firm.
2. To provide reliable information about the financial performance and financial
soundness of the concern.
3. To provide sufficient information about results of operation of business over a
period of time.
4. To provide useful information about the financial conditions of the business and
movement of resources in and out of business.
16
5. To provide necessary to enable the users to evaluate the earning performance of
resources or management performance in forecasting the earning potentials of
business.
1.15 ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Preparation of financial statement is the important part of accounting process. To
provide more meaningful information to enables to owners, investors, creditors or
users of financial statements to evaluate the operational efficiency of the concern
during the particular period.
Analysis and interpretation of financial statements, therefore, refers to such a
treatment of the information contained in the Income Statement and the Balance Sheet
so as to afford full diagnosis of the profitability and financial soundness of the
business. In order to fulfill the need of above, it is essential to consider analysis and
interpretation of financial statements.
The term “Analysis” refers to rearrangement of the data given in the financial
statements. In other words, simplification of data by methodical classification of the
data given in the financial statements.
The term “Interpretation” refers to “explaining the meaning and significance of the
data so simplified.”
However, both ‘Analysis’ and ‘Interpretation’ are complementary to each other.
Interpretation requires Analysis, while Analysis is useless without interpretation.
Financial statement analysis and interpretation refer to the process of establishing the
meaningful relationship between the items of two financial statements with the
objective of identifying the financial and operational strengths and weakness.
17
1.16 TECHNIQUES OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
There are many technique of financial analysis which is as under:
Figure 1.2: Techniques of Financial Analysis
1.16.1 Comparative Financial Statements
Comparative financial statements are those statements which have been designed in a
way so to provide time perspective to the consideration of various elements of
financial position embodied in such statements. In these statement figures for two or
more periods are placed side by side to facilitate comparison. Both the Income
Statement and Balance Sheet can prepared in from of comparative financial
statements.
1.16.2 Common Size Financial Statements
Common size financial statements are those in which figures reported are converted in
to percentages to some common base. The comparative common size financial
statements show the percentage of each item to the total in each period but not
variations in respective items form period to period. However, common size financial
statements are useful for studying the comparative financial position of two or more
business.
18
1.16.3 Trend Percentages
Trend percentages are immensely helpful in making a comparative study of the
financial statements for several years The method of trend percentages is a useful
analytical device analytical device for the several the management since by
substituting percentages for large amounts, the brevity and readability are achieved.
There are usually calculated only for major items since propose is to highlight
important changes.
1.16.4 Fund Flow Analysis
Funds flows analysis has become an important tool in the analytical kit of financial
analysts, credit granting institutions and financial manager Funds flow analysis revel
the changes in working capital position. It tells about the sources from which the
working capital was obtained and the purpose for which it was used. It brings out in
open the changes which have taken place behind the balance sheet.
1.16.5 Cost Volume Profit Analysis
Cost volume profit analysis is an important tool of profit planning. It is an important
tool for the management for decision making. It tells the volume of sales at which the
firm will break even, selling price and cost, and finally, the quality to be produced and
sold to reach the target profit level.
1.16.6 Ratio Analysis
Ratio analysis used to determine the financial soundness of a business concern.
Alexander Wall designed a system of ratio analysis and presented it in useful form in
the year 1909. Ratio simply means one number expressed in terms of another. A ratio
is a statistical yardstick by means of which relationship between two or various
figures can be compared or measured.
1.17 DEFINITION OF ACCOUNTING RATIO
The term "accounting ratios" is used to describe significant relationship between
figures shown on a balance sheet, in a profit and loss account, in a budgetary control
system or in any other part of accounting organization. Accounting ratios thus shows
the relationship between accounting data.
19
Ratios can be found out by dividing one number by another number. Ratios show how
one number is related to another. It may be expressed in the form of co-efficient,
percentage, proportion, or rate.
Ratio Analysis is one of the techniques of financial analysis ratio are used as a
yardstick for evaluating the financial condition and performance of a firm.
1.18 RATIO CAN BE EXPRESSED IN THREE WAYS
1.18.1 Times
When one value is divided by another the unit used to express the quotient is termed
as “times”.
1.18.2 Percentage
If the quotient obtained is multiplied by 100, the unit of expression is termed as
“percentage”.
1.18.3 Proportion
If one number divided by another and express relationship between first and second
number is known as proportion. i.e., 2:1
Accounting ratio is therefore, mathematical relationship expressed between inter-
connected accounting figures.
1.19 ADVANTAGES OF RATIO ANALYSIS
Ratio analysis is an important and age-old technique of financial analysis. The
following are some of the advantages / benefits of ratio analysis:
1.19.1 It simplifies financial statements
It simplifies the comprehension of financial statements. Ratios tell the whole story of
changes in the financial condition of the business
1.19.2 Facilitates inter-firm comparison
It provides data for inter-firm comparison. Ratios highlight the factors associated with
successful and unsuccessful firm. They also reveal strong firms and weak firms,
overvalued and undervalued firms.
20
1.19.3 Helps in planning
It helps in planning and forecasting. Ratios can assist management, in its basic
functions of forecasting, planning, co-ordination, control and communications.
1.19.4 Makes inter-firm comparison possible
Ratios analysis also makes possible comparison of the performance of different
divisions of the firm. The ratios are helpful in deciding about their efficiency or
otherwise in the past and likely performance in the future.
1.19.5 Help in investment decisions
It helps in investment decisions in the case of investors and lending decisions in the
case of bankers etc.
1.20 LIMITATIONS OF RATIOS ANALYSIS
The ratios analysis is one of the most powerful tools of financial management.
Though ratios are simple to calculate and easy to understand, they suffer from serious
limitations.
1.20.1 Limitations of financial statements
Ratios are based only on the information which has been recorded in the financial
statements. Financial statements themselves are subject to several limitations. Thus
ratios derived, there from, are also subject to those limitations. For example, non-
financial changes though important for the business are not relevant by the financial
statements. Financial statements are affected to a very great extent by accounting
conventions and concepts. Personal judgment plays a great part in determining the
figures for financial statements.
1.20.2 Comparative study required
Ratios are useful in judging the efficiency of the business only when they are
compared with past results of the business. However, such a comparison only provide
glimpse of the past performance and forecasts for future may not prove correct since
several other factors like market conditions, management policies, etc. may affect the
future operations.
21
Ratios alone are not adequate: Ratios are only indicators, they cannot be taken as final
regarding good or bad financial position of the business. Other things have also to be
seen.
1.20.3 Problems of price level changes
A change in price level can affect the validity of ratios calculated for different time
periods. In such a case the ratio analysis may not clearly indicate the trend in solvency
and profitability of the company. The financial statements, therefore, be adjusted
keeping in view the price level changes if a meaningful comparison is to be made
through accounting ratios.
1.20.4 Lack of adequate standard
No fixed standard can be laid down for ideal ratios. There are no well accepted
standards or rule of thumb for all ratios which can be accepted as norm. It renders
interpretation of the ratios difficult.
1.20.5 Limited use of single ratios
A single ratio, usually, does not convey much of a sense. To make a better
interpretation, a number of ratios have to be calculated which is likely to confuse the
analyst than help him in making any good decision.
1.20.6 Personal bias
Ratios are only means of financial analysis and not an end in itself. Ratios have to
interpret and different people may interpret the same ratio in different way.
1.20.7 Incomparable
Not only industries differ in their nature, but also the firms of the similar business
widely differ in their size and accounting procedures etc. It makes comparison of
ratios difficult and misleading.
22
REFERENCES
1. Agrawal, M.R., (2010)., “Financial Management” (Principle and Practice),
Garima Publication, Jaipur (Rajasthan), Ninth Edition, p 3.1 to 3.11.
2. “Best Return On Marketing”, retrieved October 20,2012, From
http://bestreturnonmarketinginvestment.com/3.html.
3. John, Philip. Jones., (2005)., “How to Turn Advertising Expenses into
Investment”, Pearson, p 1-4.
4. Leigh, McAlister. Ruth, N. Bolton., and Ross, Rizley, Editers., (2009).,
“Essential Readings in Marketing”, Published by Marketing Science Institute, p
35-38.
5. Maheshwari, S. N., (2006)., “Management Accounting and Financial Control”,
Sultanchand and Sons’ Publication, 15th Edition, Reprint 2007, p B-3- B-17.
6. Paul, W. Farris., Neil, T. Bendle., Phillip, E. Pfeifer., David, j. Reibstein., (2011).,
“Marketing Metrics”, Pearson, 2nd Edition, p 1-3.
7. Paul, W. Farris., Neil, T. Bendle., Phillip, E. Pfeifer., David, j. Reibstein., (2011).,
“Marketing Metrics”, Pearson, 2nd Edition, p 56-57.
8. Periasamy, P., (2005) “Financial Cost and Management Accounting”, Himalaya
Publishing House, First Edition, p 149 to 168.
9. Philip, Kotler., Kevin, Lane, Keller., Abraham Koshy, Mithileshwar. Jha., (2009).,
“Marketing Management”, A south Asian perspective, 13th edition, p 27.
10. Powell. Guy. R., “Return on Marketing Investment”, Retrieved October 12, 2012,
fromhttp://www.amazon.fr/Return-Marketing-Investment-Guy-Powell/dp/product
-description/0971859817.
11. Rust, T. Ronald., Ambler Tim, Carpenter S. Gregory, Kumar V. & Shrivastava, R.
K., “Measuring Marketing Productivity: Current Knowledge and Future
Direction”, Journal of Marketing Vol. 68 (October-2004), p 76-89.
12. Shanker, Ravi., (2009)., “Service Marketing the Indian Perspective” Excel
Books, First Edition Reprint, p 290 -293.