Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law

37
Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law Natural Law

description

Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law. Natural Law. Agenda. 1. Natural Law 2. Roncarelli v. Duplessis. Learning Goal for Today. By the end of the lesson, students will be able to explain the main philosophers of natural law. Expectations. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law

Page 1: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Chapter 1 – Heritage of Law

Natural Law

Page 2: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Agenda 1. Natural Law 2. Roncarelli v. Duplessis

Page 3: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Learning Goal for Today By the end of the lesson, students

will be able to explain the main philosophers of natural law

Page 4: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Expectations Analyse the views of historical and

contemporary philosophers of law CGE4c – responds to, manages and

constructively influences change in a discerning manner

CGe7d – promotes the sacredness of life

Page 5: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Aristotle and Rationalism(384-322 BCE)

a student of Plato at the Academy in 4th century AthensBelieved that: what sets humans apart from other species is our ability to reason which allows us to tell the difference between good and bad, the just and unjust Reason is the spark of the divine in human beings

Page 6: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Plato and Aristotle

Page 7: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Concept of Rationalism

Is the process of using reason to analyze the natural world through observation.

Page 8: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Plato believed

anyone who really knew what good was would do good.

Page 9: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Aristotle disagreed

he believed there were three classes of people

1. Some are born good2. Some can be made good through

education3. Majority of people are ruled by their

passions and education alone will not make them good. Only law can make people behave well.

Page 10: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

According to Aristotle

“Law, which regulates human life in the state, has this as its highest purpose-to help citizens use their faculty of reason to reach their greatest potential and by doing so to live a good life.”

Page 11: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Cicero (106-43 BCE)Limits of Civil Law

leading politician, lawyer and legal philosopher

Page 13: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Romans believed

That the ideal law was rooted in a divine source

Page 14: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

According to Cicero:

“Law is a natural force; it is the mind and reason of the intelligent man by which justice and injustice are measured.”

Page 15: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Natural laws

They are universal and unchanging.

This idea gave the Romans a higher law, presumed both a moral and legal superiority.

Page 16: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Cicero advocated

Civil or human laws should be set aside or disobeyed if, in the minds of the “wise and intelligent man”; laws were deemed to be in conflict with those of nature.

Page 17: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Civil disobedience:

Could be used to compel lawmakers and government leaders to reform laws that failed to conform to the laws of nature.

Page 18: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Cicero

Nature was best represented by those activities that were for the common good and had some general degree of application to all citizens.

Page 19: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

St. Augustine (354-430 CE)

“Ideal justice can be achieved only when the “City of God” comes on earth, meaning when God came back to earth and Christian justice reigned supreme.”

Page 21: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

St. Thomas Aquinas(1225-1274)

“Law is chiefly ordained to the common good,” and that the intention of the law-maker should be to “lead men to virtue.”

Page 23: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Aquinas claimed

Natural science and rationalism were consistent with Christian truths

Church-made, or canon law was to rule over all civil, or human-made laws

Page 24: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Aquinas

Law must mirror a natural world order made known to humans by their own process of reasoning and by the divine revelation of Christian prophets

Page 25: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Aquinas Necessary connection between law

and reason; reason invested law with its very legitimacy

Page 26: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Practical reason:

tells one what ought to be done

directs humans to do good and avoid evil

Page 27: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Identified four kinds of law Eternal law: is the body of laws by

which God created the universe and keeps it in operation.

Exists outside time and will never change

Page 28: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Eternal Law

Impossible for humans to have a perfect knowledge of eternal law because it is impossible for us to understand the mind of God

Page 29: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Natural Law Is the eternal law as it operates in

humans and can be known by us.

We know this law through our faculty of reason and can see its workings in the natural world around us

Page 30: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Divine positive law:

Is that part of the eternal law that has been revealed in the scriptures

Includes: Ten Commandments Sermon on the Mount

Page 31: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Human positive law:

Consists of laws that human beings have made for the proper functioning of society and the state.

Example: thus shall not kill, but written law against murder in which the act is defined and penalties are set out

Page 32: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Rules of Natural Law

The validity of a law is dependent upon its moral content, or justness

Page 33: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Aquinas order

1. Preserve life2. To reproduce3. To educate offspring4. To know the truth about God5. To live in society6. To shun ignorance7. To avoid offending others

Page 34: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Aquinas

Humans are created for a spiritual purpose; to live in such a way that they will be united with God after death.

Page 35: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

According to Aquinas,

Natural law may be altered if the change is the adding of laws that would benefit human life.

People are under no moral obligation to obey any laws that conflict with divine laws.

Page 36: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law
Page 37: Chapter 1 – Heritage of  Law

Homework Hwk read Roncarelli v. Duplessis

[1959] SCR 121 on p.89 & do ?’s #1-4, p.90