Champ Fs Absenteeism Web

3
School Absenteeism and Children’s Health North Carolina 2007–2009 CI = 95 percent condence interval; explanation for how to interpret CIs is available at www.s chs.state.nc. us/SCHS/champ/interpreting.html. School Absenteeism Parents of students enrolled in public and private schools in North Carolina were asked to report how many school days their child had missed within the past year due to an illness or injury. Twenty-six percent of parents reported that their child did not miss any days of school due to illness or injury; 49 percent reported that their child missed one to four days of school (less than one week); 16 percent reported that their child missed ve to nine days of school (one to two weeks); and 9 percent reported that their child missed 10 or more days of school (two or more weeks). The number of school days missed due to illness or injury did not vary by grade level. On average, 9 percent of elementary school, middle school, and high school students were absent from school for two or more weeks  within the past year due t o an illness or injury. School Achievement Describing their child’s grades over the past 12 months, 54 percent of parents reported that their child made mostly A’s, 30 percent reported that their child made mostly B’s, 13 percent reported that their child made mostly C’s, and 3 percent reported that their child made mostly D’s or F’s. Student school achievement varied by school attendance. Students  who missed two or more weeks of schoo l d ue to illne ss or injury were more likely to make mostly C’s, D’s or F’s compared to students who missed less than two weeks of school (27% [CI 21–33] vs. 15% [CI 14–16]). March 2011 Never  Absent 26%  Absent One to Two Weeks 16%  Absent Les s than One Week 49% Parental Report of Number of School Days Child Missed Due to Illness or Injury  Absent Two or More Weeks 9% Parental Report of Child’s Grades in School by Number of School Days Missed Due to Illness or Injury 56% 56% 50% 40% 28% 30% 31% 33% 12% 12% 15% 21% 3% 2% 4% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Never  Absent  Absent Less Than One Week  Absent One to Two Weeks  Absent Two or More Weeks Mostl y A's Mostl y B's Mostly C's Mostl y D's or F's Health Status Children’s health status varied by school attendance. Students who were absent two or more weeks due to illness or injury were more likely than students who were absent less than two weeks to be rated as in fair or poor general health (12% [CI 8–16] vs. 3% [CI 2–4]) as well as having fair or poor dental health (12% [CI 8–17] vs. 7% [CI 5–8]). Students absent two or more we eks were also more like to have been told by a doctor that they have asthma (21% [CI 17–26] vs. 9% [CI 8–10]) and require more medical care, mental health, or educational services than their peers due to a chronic medical, behavioral, or other health condition (i.e., Special Health Car e Needs (SHCN); 31% [CI 26–36] vs. 9% [CI 8–10]). Students (ages 10–17 years) absent more than two weeks due to illness or injury were somewhat more likely to be overweight or obese compared to students absent less than two weeks (40% [CI 33–47] vs. 33% [CI 31–35]). Children’s Health Status by Number of School Days Missed Due to Illness or Injury 3% 7% 9% 9% 33% 12% 12% 21% 31% 40% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Fair/Poor Health Fair/Poor Dental Health  Asthma (Current) SHCN Overweight/ Obese  Absent <2 weeks Absent 2+ weeks

Transcript of Champ Fs Absenteeism Web

Page 1: Champ Fs Absenteeism Web

7/31/2019 Champ Fs Absenteeism Web

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/champ-fs-absenteeism-web 1/2

School Absenteeism

and Children’s Health

North Carolina 2007–2009

†CI = 95 percent condence interval; explanation for how to interpret CIs is available at www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/champ/interpreting.html.

School Absenteeism

Parents of students enrolled in public and private schools in NorthCarolina were asked to report how many school days their child hadmissed within the past year due to an illness or injury. Twenty-sixpercent of parents reported that their child did not miss any days of school due to illness or injury; 49 percent reported that their childmissed one to four days of school (less than one week); 16 percentreported that their child missed ve to nine days of school (one totwo weeks); and 9 percent reported that their child missed 10 ormore days of school (two or more weeks). The number of school

days missed due to illness or injury did not vary by grade level. Onaverage, 9 percent of elementary school, middle school, and highschool students were absent from school for two or more weeks

 within the past year due to an illness or injury.

School Achievement

Describing their child’s grades over the past 12months, 54 percent of parents reported that theirchild made mostly A’s, 30 percent reported that theirchild made mostly B’s, 13 percent reported that theirchild made mostly C’s, and 3 percent reported thattheir child made mostly D’s or F’s. Student school

achievement varied by school attendance. Students who missed two or more weeks of school due to illnessor injury were more likely to make mostly C’s, D’sor F’s compared to students who missed less thantwo weeks of school (27% [CI 21–33]† vs. 15% [CI14–16]).

March 2011

Never 

 Absent

26% Absent

One to Two

Weeks

16%

 Absent Less than

One Week

49%

Parental Report of Number of School DaysChild Missed Due to Illness or Injury

 Absent Two

or More Weeks

9%

Parental Report of Child’s Grades in Schoolby Number of School Days Missed Due to Illness or Injury

56% 56%

50%

40%

28% 30% 31% 33%

12% 12%15%

21%

3% 2% 4%6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Never 

 Absent

 Absent Less

Than One Week

 Absent One to

Two Weeks

 Absent Two

or More Weeks

Mostly A's Mostly B's Mostly C's Mostly D's or F's

Health Status

Children’s health status varied by school attendance.Students who were absent two or more weeks due toillness or injury were more likely than students who wereabsent less than two weeks to be rated as in fair or poor

general health (12% [CI 8–16] vs. 3% [CI 2–4]) as well ashaving fair or poor dental health (12% [CI 8–17] vs. 7%[CI 5–8]). Students absent two or more weeks were alsomore like to have been told by a doctor that they haveasthma (21% [CI 17–26] vs. 9% [CI 8–10]) and requiremore medical care, mental health, or educational servicesthan their peers due to a chronic medical, behavioral, orother health condition (i.e., Special Health Care Needs(SHCN); 31% [CI 26–36] vs. 9% [CI 8–10]). Students(ages 10–17 years) absent more than two weeks dueto illness or injury were somewhat more likely to beoverweight or obese compared to students absent less than two weeks (40% [CI 33–47] vs. 33% [CI 31–35]).

Children’s Health Status by Number of School Days Missed Due to Illness or Injury

3%

7%9% 9%

33%

12% 12%

21%

31%

40%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Fair/Poor 

Health

Fair/Poor 

Dental Health

 Asthma

(Current)

SHCN Overweight /

Obese

 Absent <2 weeks Absent 2+ weeks

Page 2: Champ Fs Absenteeism Web

7/31/2019 Champ Fs Absenteeism Web

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/champ-fs-absenteeism-web 2/2

State of North Carolina / Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor Department of Health and Human Services / Lanier M. Cansler, Secretary / www.ncdhhs.gov

North Carolina Division of Public Health / Jeffrey P. Engel, State Health Director / www.publichealth.nc.govState Center for Health Statistics / Karen L. Knight, Director / CHAMP / (919) 855-4494 / www.schs.state.nc.us/SCHS/cham p

North Carolina DHHS is an equal opportunity employer and provider.

Health Care

Children’s health care access did not vary by schoolattendance. Prevalence rates were similar amongstudents who were absent two or more weeks due toillness or injury and students who were absent lessthan two weeks for being uninsured within the past

 year (16% [CI 12–20] vs. 12% [CI 10–13]; lacking apersonal doctor or nurse who is familiar with thechild’s health history (18% [CI 14–22] vs. 19% [CI17–20]); not having a preventive health care visit

 within the past year (23% [CI 18–28] vs. 19% [CI18–20]); and not having visited a dentist within thepast year (13% [CI 10–17] vs. 10% [CI 9–12]).

This report includes data collected from 2007 to 2009 on 5,854 parental surveys on children enrolled in a public or private school from the

North Carolina Child Health Assessment and Monitoring Program (NC CHAMP). NC CHAMP is a surveillance system that collects information

about the health characteristics of children ages 0 to 17 years through a follow-up survey of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

(BRFSS) telephone survey of adults (18 years and older). All adult respondents with children living in their household are invited to participate

in NC CHAMP. One child is randomly selected from the household and the adult most knowledgeable about the health of the selected child is

interviewed. Percentages are weighted to population characteristics. For further information about NC CHAMP, please visit www.schs.state.

nc.us/SCHS/champ or contact [email protected] .

Key Findings

Based on parental report, students with greater absenteeism (two or more weeks) due to illness or injury compared tostudents with lower absenteeism (less than two weeks) were found to be:

● more likely to make mostly C’s, D’s, or F’s (27% vs. 15%);

● rated as in fair or poor general health (12% vs. 3%) and dental health (12% vs. 7%);

● more likely to have asthma (21% vs. 9%);

● more likely to have special health care needs (31% vs. 9%);

● more likely to live in a household experiencing issues with food insecurity (24% vs. 8%).

Health care access and utilization did not vary by student absenteeism.

Children’s Health Care Access and Food Insecurity byNumber of School Days Missed Due to Illness or Injury

12%

19% 19%

10%8%

16%18%

23%

13%

24%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Without

Health Insurance

Without

Personal Doctor 

No Preventive

Health Care

within Past Year 

No Preventive

Dental Care

within Past Year 

Food

Insecure

 Absent <2 weeks Absent 2+ weeks

Household Food Insecurity

Parents of students who were absent two or more weeks due to illness or injury were three times more likely to report thatthey often relied on only a few kinds of low-cost food to feed their child because there wasn’t enough money to buy food,

compared to parents of students who were absent less than two weeks (24% [CI 19–29] vs. 8% [CI 7–9]).