Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

41
Challenges in Frustrated Magnets Leon Balents, UCSB Aspen conference on "New Horizons in Condensed Matter Physics", 2008

description

Challenges in Frustrated Magnets. Leon Balents, UCSB. Aspen conference on "New Horizons in Condensed Matter Physics", 2008. Collaborators. Doron Bergman (Yale) Jason Alicea (Caltech) Simon Trebst (MS Station Q) Lucile Savary (ENS Lyon) Ryuichi Shindou (RIKEN). What is frustration?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Page 1: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Leon Balents, UCSB

Aspen conference on "New Horizons inCondensed Matter Physics", 2008

Page 2: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Collaborators Doron Bergman (Yale) Jason Alicea (Caltech) Simon Trebst (MS Station Q) Lucile Savary (ENS Lyon) Ryuichi Shindou (RIKEN)

Page 3: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

What is frustration? Competing interactions

Can’t satisfy all interactions simultaneously

Optimization is “frustrating”

“People need trouble – a little frustration to sharpen the spirit on, toughen it. Artists do; I don't mean you need to live in a rat hole or gutter, but you have to learn fortitude, endurance. Only vegetables are happy.” – William Faulkner

Page 4: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Checkerboard lattice

From H. Takagi

Page 5: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Frustration: Constrained Degeneracy When kBT ¿ J, system (classically) obeys

local constraint minimizing J Triangular lattice Ising antiferromagnet

One dissatisfied bond per triangle Entropy 0.34 kB / spin

X

Page 6: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Frustration: Constrained Degeneracy When kBT ¿ J, system (classically) is

constrained to ground state manifold Pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet

ACr2O4

Page 7: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Frustration: Constrained Degeneracy When kBT ¿ J, system (classically) is

constrained to ground state manifold “Spin ice”: 2 in/2 out Ising spins

Pauling entropy ¼ ½ ln(3/2) kB / spin

Dy2Ti2O7

Page 8: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Challenges Spin liquids

How does system fluctuate – thermally or quantum mechanically – amongst the degenerate states?

What are the signatures/probes of such correlated but not ordered phases?

Sensitivity How can degeneracy be split? Can this be manipulated to control the system’s

state? Can unusual but desirable states be obtained this

way?

Page 9: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Challenges Spin liquids

How does system fluctuate – thermally or quantum mechanically – amongst the degenerate states?

What are the signatures/probes of such correlated but not ordered phases?

Sensitivity How can degeneracy be split? Can this be manipulated to control the system’s

state? Can unusual but desirable states be obtained this

way?

Page 10: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Defining the spin liquid regime

“Frustration parameter” f=CW/TN & 5-10 System fluctuates between competing ordered

states for TN<T<CW

What is the nature of the correlated liquid? Thermal fluctuations Quantum fluctuations: f = 1

Spin liquid

Ramirez

Page 11: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

One class: “dipolar” spin liquids Classical pyrochlore spin liquids (e.g. spin

ice) are “emergent diamagnets” Local constraint: Dipolar correlations

Youngblood and Axe, 1980Isakov, Moessner, Sondhi 2003

Y2Ru2O7: J. van Duijn et al, 2007

Page 12: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

A Problem Signatures of spin liquid correlations in

neutron scattering are subtle Not peaks

Often single crystal neutron scattering is not available

Page 13: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

“Spin liquid theory” needed Dynamics

Thermal and spin transport? Temporal correlations?

Impurities How does a defect affect the correlated

medium? Analog of Friedel oscillations? How do they couple?

Phase transitions What is the nature of ordering phenomena out

of the spin liquid? Constraint can change critical behavior

Page 14: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

“Spin liquid theory” needed Dynamics

Thermal and spin transport? Temporal correlations?

Impurities How does a defect affect the correlated

medium? Analog of Friedel oscillations? How do they couple?

Phase transitions What is the nature of ordering phenomena out

of the spin liquid? Constraint can change critical behavior

Page 15: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Strange spin glasses in HFMs SCGO: SrCr9pGa12-9pO19 s=3/2 kagome

• Tg independent of disorder at small dilution?• Unusual T2 specific heat?

• nearly H-independent!

Ramirez et al, 89-90.

Page 16: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Can impurities be clarifying? Impurities may induce observable distortions

in the correlated medium C.f. Friedel oscillation Long-range impurity interactions?

Can look for differences in impurity-induced glassy states Formation with even weak impurities? Unconventional properties and transitions?

Page 17: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Dilution Non-magnetic one substitution In dimer picture, this removes a link on

which a dimer may sit

- -

2 un-satisfied tetrahedra Dipole or charge 2 source!

Indeed observe long-range disturbance

Page 18: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

“Spin liquid theory” needed Dynamics

Thermal and spin transport? Temporal correlations?

Impurities How does a defect affect the correlated

medium? Analog of Friedel oscillations? How do they couple?

Phase transitions What is the nature of ordering phenomena out

of the spin liquid? Constraint can change critical behavior

Page 19: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Random bonds Jij ! Jij+Jij

Degeneracy of different states obviously broken Expect: glassy state for kBT ¿ |Jij|

Q: What is the nature of the glass transition?

Numerical evidence of Saunders and Chalker for such behavior in classical Heisenberg pyrochlore (2007)

Page 20: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Expect unconventional transition General argument (Bergman et al, 2006):

Low T order parameter does not describe the dipolar correlations in the paramagnetic phase

Can be argued that transition should be described by a gauge theory in which the Higgs phenomena quenches the dipolar fluctuations in the low temperature state

Holds for any interactions (also non-random) that quench the entropy Recent examples studied by Alet et al and

Pickles et al

Page 21: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

A simple and dramatic example Classical cubic dimer model

Hamiltonian

Model has unique ground state – no symmetry breaking.

Nevertheless there is a continuous phase transition! Without constraint there is only a crossover.

Page 22: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Numerics (courtesy S. Trebst)

Specific heat

C

T/V

“Crossings”

Page 23: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Many open issues How do multiple non-magnetic impurities

interact in a dipolar spin liquid? What is the phase diagram of a frustrated

pyrochlore with dilution? Purely geometrical problem with no energy

scale! What is the nature of the glass transition

from a dipolar Ising spin liquid?

Page 24: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Other spin liquids

Page 25: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Other classical spin liquids? A-site spinels

1 900

FeSc2S4

10 205

CoAl2O4

MnSc2S4

MnAl2O4

CoRh2O4 Co3O4

s = 5/2

s = 3/2

f À 1: “Spiral spin liquid” Q-fluctuations constrained to “spiral surface” Analogous questions can/should be asked here

Page 26: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Quantum Spin Liquids What is a frustrated quantum system?

Level repulsion – macroscopic degeneracy is “never” present in a “generic” quantum system

Non-generic examples Free electrons in a magnetic field Nearest-neighbor Heisenberg antiferromagnet on

kagome lattice in a high magnetic field

Usually we mean that the Hamiltonian is “close” to a non-generic one with a large degeneracy e.g. it is frustrated in the classical limit

Page 27: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Quantum Spin Liquids f = CW/TN =1

System remains disordered even at T=0 T>0 behavior controlled by correlations and

excitations of the QSL RVB and gauge theories

Proof of principle models Low energy phenomenology

+ + …

Page 28: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Only one ¼ consistent with RVB/gauge theory!

Quantum Spin Liquids Many recent experimental candidates

ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 kagome

Na4Ir3O8 hyperkagome

NiGa2S4 triangular s=1 -(BEDT) organic triangular lattice FeSc2S4 diamond lattice spin-orbital liquid

Theoretical phenomenology (fermionic gauge theories) Shrinking susceptibility as T ! 0 (I) Expect Wilson ratio

Page 29: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Na3Ir4O7 Hyperkagome A quantum paramagnet:

CW¼ -650K2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

1 (

mol

Ir/

cm3 )

3002001000T (K)

Na4Ir3O8

H = 1 T

5d5 LS

Ir4+

S = 1/2

60

40

20

0Cm

/T (

mJ/

Km

ol I

r+T

i)

200150100500T (K)

8

6

4

2

0

S m (

J/K

mol

Ir+

Ti)

1.8

1.6

1.4

(1

0-3em

u/m

ol I

r)

1086420T (K)

2.0

1.8

1.6

1.4

10-3

x = 0

0.01 T0.1 T1 T5 T

Tg

1

0-3

em

u/m

ol Ir

» Const

C » T2

inconsistent with quasiparticle picture?

Same behavior in other s=1/2 materials!

0 10K

Oka

moto

et

al

Page 30: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Possible complications Spin-orbit coupling

Can increase without modifying cv

Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya coupling often present Impurities

Clearly present in large concentrations in some of the materials

Are expected to modify both cv and in the QSLs C.f. A. Kolezhuk et al, 2006; K. Gregor + O. Motrunich,

2008. Similar issues (effect of and on the medium) as in

classical spin liquids apply

Page 31: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

(P. Schiffer and I. Daruka PRB, 56, 13712(1997)

~ -4 K

6

4

2

0

C2

(10-2

emu/

Km

ol I

r)

0.40.30.20.10.0x (Ti)

0.16

0.12

0.08

0.04

0.00

nearly free spin/all spin

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

1 (

mol

Ir/

cm3 )

3002001000T (K)

Na4(Ir1 xTix)3O8

H = 1 Tx = 0

x = 0.05

x = 0.1x = 0.2

x = 0.3

Dilution (Ti doping) releases spins Two population fit of

Approximately 0.3B released per Ti!

Page 32: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Orbital Liquids?

Spinel FeSc2S4

CW=50K, TN<30mK: f>1600! Integrated entropy indicates

orbitals are involved

Orbital degeneracy is a common feature in oxides (perovskites, spinels, etc.) Often removed by Jahn-Teller effect Can JT be avoided by frustration and

fluctuations? Can orbitals be quantum degrees of freedom?

Page 33: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Issues Spin liquids

How does system fluctuate – thermally or quantum mechanically – amongst the degenerate states?

What are the signatures/probes of such correlated but not ordered phases?

Sensitivity How can degeneracy be split? Can this be manipulated to control the system’s

state? Can unusual but desirable states be obtained this

way?

Page 34: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Cr: d3

Spinel: ACr2X4

A=Zn,Cd,HgX=O

Antiferromagnet Multiferroic

A=Mn,Fe,CoX=O

A=CdX=S

Colossal magnetocapacitance

Data from S.-H. Lee, Takagi, Loidl groups

Sensitivity of Frustrated Magnets

Page 35: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Sensitivity – general issues Frustration-induced degeneracy is fragile

Can be broken by spin-orbit, further distance exchange, spin-lattice coupling…

But must project into degenerate subspace This restores some universality

Similar to Haldane pseudopotentials in LLL

but

Page 36: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Example – HgCr2O4 spinel Magnetization plateau

3:1 tetrahedral composition

Two important perturbations Spin-lattice coupling Quantum fluctuations

Both favor same state! Seen in neutrons

Matsuda et al

Y. Ueda et al

Page 37: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

What is frustration good for? Obtain coexisting orders

Multiferroics: magnetism and ferroelectricity Strong spin-lattice coupling effects in frustrated

magnets Non-collinear spiral magnetism is very generic and

couples (often) to electric polarization

CoCr2O4

Yamasaki et al, 2006

Page 38: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

What is frustration good for? Control magnetism by engineering

interactions Only small changes need be made even when

dominant exchange is large Interesting to try by oxide interface

engineering c.f. J. Tchakalian et al, La(Cr/Fe/Mn)O3 layers already

under study Can “generic” spiral states of frustrated magnets be

disrupted in interesting ways by interfaces?

Page 39: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Challenges Spin liquids

Spin liquid theory needed! Especially: signatures/probes of such

correlated but not ordered phases? Sensitivity

Systematics of degeneracy splitting needed Try to use frustration to enable control of

magnetic state

Page 40: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

The Future Controlling correlations and frustration

Understand the mechanisms behind competing/coexisting orders and correlated liquids

In magnets and other contexts Learn to control them by

Chemistry and materials processing (e.g. oxide heterostructures)

External means (gates, fields, strain, etc.)

Tremendous improvements in our understanding of correlated materials Improved probes (SNS, tunneling, Inelastic x-rays) Improved materials (laser MBE…) Improved theory: synergy of ab initio and

phenomenological methods

Page 41: Challenges in Frustrated Magnets

Conclusions Impurities can reveal the correlations in

spin liquid states Experiments and theory point to new

types of glassy phases and transitions in these materials

Even for the best understood “dipolar” spin liquid, impurity physics is largely mysterious