[Challenge:Future] Semi finals - Regional Strategies and the Emerging South-East European Companies
-
Upload
challengefuture -
Category
Documents
-
view
94 -
download
0
Transcript of [Challenge:Future] Semi finals - Regional Strategies and the Emerging South-East European Companies
In our work, we focused on the region of South-East Europe (SEE), more specifically the Western Balkans. The countries we are analysing are Macedonia, Kosovo, Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia.
All of these countries (with the occasional exception of Croatia, but we include it due to ties remaining from Yugoslavia):
◦ Have a GDP (PPP) that is less than 50% of the EU average, differentiating them from the 2004 and 2007 EU enlargement countries
◦ They all rank a 4 out of 7 on the global competitiveness index
◦ They have all had a GDP drop of around 5,5% in 2009 due to the crisis, and a drop in FDI since then
◦ They are experiencing a slow recovery (W shape recession)
◦ Have a problem fostering environments in which companies can achieve economies of scale (only one Macedonian company ranked in the top 100 SEE companies, none from Kosovo, Montenegro, B&H and Albania
◦ They are all being supported through EBRD and IMF funds to foster development of business conditions, and these are funds that can be used towards regionalisation
Our subsequent research agreed with our original assumptions: businesses in the Western Balkans have little hope of becoming globally competitive if they continue operating as they do at the moment. This is due both to internal (business strategy) and external (business environment) challenges. There are currently no companies that employ the strategies we proposed in our original submission, except for a few wholesale chains (such as Tus and Konzum) and the metallurgy industry.
Strengths Weaknesses
- Cultural and geographic proximity
- Educated human capital
- Low industrial pollution (significant for
agriculture)
- Resources/transit between cheap raw
materials market and rich buyers
- Low operational costs
- Fixed costs, rigid legislation
- Unqualified human capital
- Unprofessional approach
- Mindset barrier
- Low economies of scale
- No brand equity for SEE businesses
Opportunities Threats
- EU moves towards standardisation and
quality control makes transfer costs lower
- Potential for more value-added production
- Becoming a region of cheap, low-value
added outsourced labour
- Unable to compete with larger markets,
such as Asia
- Becoming economically insignificant
In order to ensure quality of analysis, we conducted a SWOT analysis of SEE
businesses using data from our research and interviews
Cultural and geographic proximity: SEE countries are culturally, linguistically and geographically closer to their target markets in Western Europe. As such, they can be the markets which avoid the traditional cultural and linguistic issues which Western European and US companies face when outsourcing or moving production to Asia. Moreover, the geographic proximity significantly decreases transport costs, especially if economies of scale are achieved.
The human capital is paradoxically both educated and underqualified. While the labour market in SEE is filled with people who hold degrees and are theoretically well versed in their field, they hold little to no qualification and professional training as well as managerial and strategic skills.
These countries have a further competitive edge in the low levels of industrial pollution present. Considering the growth of organic food markets, SEE businesses can (if they develop economies of scale and quality control) become the market for organic foods. The climate is a further strength here.
Lying between the East and the West, SEE companies can benefit from importing cheap raw materials that they lack from Asia, produce a full package (something that is yet to be done) and export it to Western European and US markets with significant value-added.
The relatively weak economies in SEE countries mean that operational costs are significantly lower than elsewhere. This applies to fixed and variable costs alike. With Croatia’s EU accession later this year, businesses that want to remain close to the EU market, but don’t want to be based in the EU will relocate to neighbouring countries and the businesses expertise that Croatia will receive can be transferred across the borders into the rest of the Western Balkans region.
In order to develop a successful business model, we had to identify what opportunities
SEE businesses could capitalise on.
Business model of a hypothetical organic foods company
In our research we identified several industries that can profit from the business model we present (pharmaceutical companies, the telecommunications providers and the textile industry). We chose agriculture as the industry we see with the most unexplored potential, none of which has been explored and modernised.
Combined
value chain
Gather fresh produce
according to regional
comparative advantage
Organise into fresh and
processed foods
Synthetise into fresh
produce and packaged,
process food
Distribute using satelites,
e-sales (Using the
Croatian market as a
doorway to the EU)
Cost structure
Low operational costs
(both fixed and variable)
Comparative advantage
production maximizes
yield
Hub strategy ensures
efficiency
Revenue model
Sales (internet and
physical)
Advertising (physical, SEO
and PCC)
Internal sales
Export (bulk and retail)
Market
segments
/consumer
relationships
Domestic buyers:
cultivate 'buy domestic'
and 'organic'
relationship
External retail and
wholesale: 'organic',
'untouched nature'
Competitive
strategy
Differentiation: organic
and fresh produce
Full package proposal
Innovation
Operational effectivenes
Key points of our business model
Government action needed
The combined value chain envisions a sequence of complementary activities that give a holistic and well-rounded final product, taking into account customers’ preferences and the cost structure:gathering fresh produce according to regional comparative advantage, then dividing for preparation into fresh or processed, synthesize and distribute.
The cost structure: low operational costs due to a mixture of intrinsic Eastern European labor market characteristics and well-developed management strategies
The concrete management strategy that must be implemented is the development of regional hub centers that will make use of the regional comparative advantage mentioned before.
To ensure the success of our revenue model, we suppose that this future company will sell its products via the internet, as well as in the well-established method of physical sales. Furthermore, we expect heavy advertising to develop the brand identity of our company (e.g. Search Engine Optimisation and Pay Per Click advertising)
In building our relationship with the consumers, we work on two main attitudes. domestic buyers’ need for locally-produced and organic goods and developing a brand name for the external buyers which will focus on “organic” and “natural” as main characteristics of the products
The competitive strategy of our company centres on four aspects: differentiation, innovation, full package proposal and operational effectiveness
Make full use of the dialogue potential of the Chambers of Commerce in SEE
Recognize the need for regionalisaion and make appropriate administrative facilitations (e.g. Harmonizing legislation) on top of current efforts to facilitate intra-region trade (Yugosphere) http://www.neweasterneurope.eu/comment/41290
Further liberalise internal markets to attract FDI
Support small and medium-sized businesses (which make an overwhelming proportion of these markets)
Executive education programmes, management exchanges to share experience
A comprehensive, practical and studious approach can make a substantial difference in a matter of months, according to representatives of the Centre for Women Entrepreneurs
A joint capacity building effort between managers and the official administration
Collecting, publishing and disseminating models of successful business practice to complement theoretical knowledge
Foster a culture of mergers and avoid short-termism in business practice
Mindset change