« CHALLENGE 2016 »
description
Transcript of « CHALLENGE 2016 »
« CHALLENGE 2016 »
Analysis
1FFE
Why change our calendar?
Fencing Is a contradictory sport (see survey)
- Fascinating / One would like to try it- Old-fashioned / Incomprehensible
«We all dreamed we were fencing!»
Competitions- Impossible to understand: Is it the rules?Is it the (difference between) the 3 weapons?Is it the game itself?Is it the refereeing?
2FFE
However There are extraordinary situations
- spectacular actions- changes of score - close matches (30% of the matches 45/44 – 45/43) (31% of the matches 15/14 – 15/13)
But despite that- no media coverage- no sponsors (of very few)
3FFE
TODAY’S FENCING product
One sport, three weapons, men and women.Rules – understood only by specialists.A calendar:
- Individual and team competitions.- World Cup and Grand Prix (what is the difference?).- The six weapons in different sites.- A relatively high cost for the nations.- Team competitions on neutral ground (exceptfor the organising country).
4FFE
- Various organisationsno uniformity, but more and more coherentspectacular progress made
Conclusion
The rules must evolveThe organisations must get better
But more importantly,the calendar must change
5FFE
The calendar
Postulate
1) The competition is primarily made for the athlete.We must take into account the various periods:- preparation time- competition time- recovery time
6FFE
2) The competition system must answer the needs of all countries, small and large, poor and rich, on all continents.It must take into account:
- the level of development of our sport- the financial means of everybody- the chance given to all to access the highest
level
7FFE
3) A new calendar must provide:- a marketing opportunity to sponsors and
television networks;- a greater media exposure;
- new financial resources for the FIE, but also for organising federations.
8FFE
TOMORROW’S FENCING product
The principle of the new calendar:
- Separate individual and team eventspros and cons- Fragment the season in three parts, each containing:Challengers Super SeriesGrand Prix 6 individual weapons- Create a real Team World League complemented by a Continental League- Create a link with the World Championships and the OGqualificationpromotion and demotion system- Create a link with the Continental Championships
9FFE
« CHALLENGE 2016 »
Simulation
10FFE
SUMMARY
Individual simulation
Team simulation
11FFE
Individual simulation Introduction: 3 types of competitions:
Challenger Super Series Grand Prix
4 geographical zones:EUROPEASIA / OCEANIAAFRICAAMERICAS
FFE 12
Individual simulationIntroduction:
The Challenger 1, Super Series 1 and Grand Prix 1 simulation starts after the 2012 London OG.
13FFE
Individual simulationFIE FENCERS*
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA AFRICA AMERICAS
MS 311 71 25 90
WS 172 67 18 67
MF 341 112 30 87
WF 186 91 21 53
ME 655 117 32 101
WE 375 78 22 95
14FFE
* Number of FIE ranked fencers per continent after the London OG, during the 2011/2012 season.
Individual simulation
FENCERS IN THE TOP 64 OF THE FIE RANKINGS
FFE 15
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA AFRICA AMERICAS
MS 37 10 7 10
WS 35 12 7 10
MF 39 13 5 7
WF 32 14 8 10
ME 37 11 5 11
WE 36 15 4 9
Individual simulation
16FFE
*: many fencers *: few fencers
MS 270* 57 14 76
WS 133 51 7* 53
MF 298* 95 21 76
WF 150 73 9* 39
ME 614* 102 23 86
WE 335* 59 14 82
Fencers ranked, without the top 64 in the world
Individual simulationQualification system for the Super
Series via the Challengers
FFE 17
Participants in the Challenger Number of qualified fencers
If > 60 fencers 16
Between 40 and 59 fencers 12
Between 20 and 39 fencers 8
If < 20 fencers 4
COMPOSITION COMPOSITION
Best world FIE ranked fencers
64 Best world FIE ranked fencers
96
Best of each continent (4x4)
16 Best of each continent (4x6)
24
Wild Cards 4 Wild Cards 4
Places reserved to the organising country
4 Places reserved to the organising country
4
Places from the preceding Challenger (4x4 to 4x16)
16 to 64
TOTAL 104 to 152 TOTAL 128
Individual simulation
Note: The « best of each continent » are added to the 64 Note: The « best of each continent » are added to the 96. 18FFE
Simulation individuelle : Formula for the 1st day
1st round: X pools of 6 or 7 fencers (16 best ranked exempted)
16 qualified after the pools
2nd round: Table of 128
3rd round: Table of 64
32 qualified after the table of 64
FFE 19
Simulation individuelle• : Formula for the 2nd day
• 1st round: Table of 64
• 2nd round: Table of 32
• 3rd round: Table of 16
• 4th round: Table of 8
• 5th round: Final of 4
FFE 20
Simulation individuelle : Formula
FFE 21
DAY FORMULA WEAPONS
1st day tables and finals MS and WS
1st day table of 128 MF and WF
2nd day table of 64 and finals
MF and WF
2nd day table of 128 ME and WE
3rd day table of 64 and finals
ME and WE
Individual simulationPoint system:
FFE 22
Events Challenger Super Series
GP and Continental Ch.
World Ch.
65 – 128 1 2 3
33 – 64 2 4 6
17 – 32 4 8 12
9 – 16 1 8 16 24
5 – 8 2 12 24 36
3 – 4 4 16 32 48
2 8 20 40 60
1 12 24 48 72
Team simulation Introduction: The composition of the groups is according to the 2011/2012
season FIE ranking.
The World Group A is composed of the first 16 teams in the world (4 pools of 4). The World Group B is composed of 4 continental pools of 4 teams each, based on the preceding Continental Championships results.
Turkey and Israel belong to the EUROPEAN zone
Key:Teams demoted after the regular events
Teams promoted after the regular events
23FFE
Team simulation Men’s Sabre: Women’s Sabre:
World Group A : World Group A :
World Group B : World Group B :
World Group C : World Group C :
24FFE
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4Russia South Korea Romania Germany
USA Italy Belarus China
France Hungary Canada Ukraine
Spain Japan Hong Kong Poland
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Georgia Iran Tunisia VenezuelaGreat-Britain Kazakhstan Egypt Argentina
Turkey Malaysia Senegal MexicoGreece Australia Rep. Congo El Salvador
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Belarus China Tapei Tunisia Venezuela
Spain Vietnam Egypt Canada
Belgium Singapore Senegal Brazil
Turkey Australia Morocco Argentina
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Azerbaijan Singapore Morocco Dominican Rep.
China Tapei Ivory Coast Colombia
Porto Rico
Chile
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
ColombiaPuerto Rico
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4Russia USA Ukraine Italy
Azerbaijan France Poland ChinaGermany Hungary Great-Britain Hong Kong
Japan Mexico South Korea Kazakhstan
Men’s Foil: Women’s Foil: World Group A: World Group A:
World Group B: World Group B:
World Group C: World Group C:
Team simulation
25FFE
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Netherlands India Morocco ColombiaTurkey Macao Togo Dominican
Rep.
Spain Costa RicaChileCubaGuatemala
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Israel Kazakhstan Tunisia Canada
Belarus Singapore Senegal Venezuela
Denmark Iran Algeria Argentina
Hungary Australia South Africa Puerto Rico
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Romania Vietnam Tunisia Venezuela
Australia Algeria Mexico
Morocco Argentina
Senegal Colombia
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Brazil
Puerto Rico
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4Italy Germany China USA
Egypt Russia France JapanGreat-Britain
South Korea
Poland Austria
Mexico Hong Kong Brazil Ukraine
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Italy Russia South Korea France
Great-Britain Japan Poland USA
Hungary Canada Germany China
Singapor Hong Kong Ukraine Egypt
Team simulation Men’s Epee: Women’s Epee: World Group A: World Group A:
World Group B: World Group B:
World Group C: * World Group C:
* next slide
26FFE
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Czech Rep. Japan Egypt Chile
Spain Australia Senegal Argentina
Israel Iran Morocco Mexico
Sweden Hong Kong Tunisia Colombia
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Switzerland Kazakhstan Tunisia Brazil
Israel Kirghizistan South Africa Venezuela
Serbia Australia Egypt Dominican Rep.
Turkey China Tapei Algeria Mexico
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Great-Britain Vietnam Senegal Puerto Rico
Spain Singapore Morocco Colombia
Qatar Costa Rica
Argentina
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
USA France Switzerland Hungary
Russia China South Korea Italy
Venezuela Canada Poland Germany
Estonia Norway Kazakhstan Ukraine
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Russia China Romania USA
Germany Ukraine Italy South Korea
Estonia Poland France Japan
Hong Kong Hungary Canada Sweden
Team simulation * World Group C : Men’s Epee:
27FFE
EUROPE ASIA / OCEANIA
AFRICA AMERICAS
Portugal China Tapei Algeria Panama
Latvia Uzbekistan Ivory Coast Puerto Rico
Belgium Indonesia Costa Rica
Netherlands Singapore Dominican Rep.
Belarus Macao Brazil
Austria India
Romania Mongolia
Finland Turkmenistan
Kirghizistan
Preparation / Recovery Competition General
Champion in top 64
Between 64th and 96th
Others lower than 100th
September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014
C1 C1 S1 T1 G1
S1 T1 G1
C1 C1 ? T1
C1 C1 ? T1 G1
28FFE
Preparation / Recovery Competition General
Champion in top 64
Between 64th and 96th
Others lower than 100th
January 2015 February 2015 March 2015 April 2015
C2 C2 S2 T2 G2 Cont. Ch
S2 T2 G2 Cont. Ch
C2 C2 ? T2 Cont. Ch
C2 C2 ? T2 G2 Cont. Ch
29FFE
Preparation / Recovery Competition General
Champion in top 64
Between 64th and 96th
Others lower than 100th
April 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015
C3 S3 T3 G3 T4 World Ch
S3 T3 G3 T4 World Ch
C3 ? T3 T4
C3 ? T3 G3 T4 World Ch
August 2015
30FFE
Preparation / Recovery Competition General
Champion in top 64
Between 64th and 96th
Others lower than 100th
September 2015 October 2015 November 2015
C1 S1 T1 G1
S1 T1 G1
C1 ? T1
C1 ? T1 G1
31FFE
Preparation / Recovery Competition General
Champion in top 64
Between 64th and 96th
Others lower than 100th
December 2015 January 2016 February 2016 March 2016
C2 C2 S2 T2 G2 Cont. Ch
S2 T2 G2 Cont. Ch
C2 C2 ? T2 Cont. Ch
C2 C2 ? T2 G2 Cont. Ch
32FFE
Preparation / Recovery Competition General
Champion in top 64
Between 64th and 96th
Others lower than 100th
April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 August 2016
C3 S3 T3 G3 T4 TPO TEAM WC
RIO OG 2016
S3 T3 G3 T4 WC RIO OG
C3 ? T3 T4 TPO WC RIO OG
C3 ? T3 G3 T4 TPO WC RIO OG
July 2016
33FFE