Chal 3 final 2.5

13
Challenge 3: Developing a D&I Template for Sustainability Across Settings Mary Daly England, Kelli Gora, Jose Daniel Navarro, Jill Weinstein NURS 738 – Group 8 College of Nursing, University of Arizona November 11, 2013

description

 

Transcript of Chal 3 final 2.5

Page 1: Chal 3 final 2.5

Challenge 3: Developing a D&I Template for Sustainability Across Settings

Mary Daly England, Kelli Gora, Jose Daniel Navarro, Jill Weinstein

NURS 738 – Group 8College of Nursing, University of Arizona

November 11, 2013

Page 2: Chal 3 final 2.5

Translational Research Template

Problem

Evidence

DevelopmentImplementation

Evaluation

Page 3: Chal 3 final 2.5

Factors affecting adoption

• Innovations penetrate homophilous groups more readily

Homophilous verses heterophilous groups

• Active dissemination is more effective

Passive dissemination verses active dissemination

• Relative advantage and compatibility

Characteristics of the intervention or innovation

• Norms and attitudes, organizational structure and process, resources

Contextual factors

Page 4: Chal 3 final 2.5

Methods to measure penetration and adoption

•Individual provider/consumer

•Service providers’ acceptance of EBP aimed at reducing child neglect

SurveysInterviews

Administrative data

•Individual provider

•Organization or setting

SurveysInterviews

Administrative dataObservation

•RE-AIM/Reach

Case audits Checklists

•Change in knowledge, attitude, behavior, quality of life

•Change in organizational policies and practice

Outcome Indicators

Page 5: Chal 3 final 2.5

sample

POWER TO REDUCE TYPE I

& TYPE II ERRORS

SIGNIFICANCE

LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE

EFFECT SIZEMARGIN OF

RANDOM ERROR

COST

Variability

Factors to be Considered in Determining Sample Size

(Fox, Hunn & Mathers, 2009;Bacchetti, McCullouch & Segal, 2008)

SAMPLE SIZE IS CRITICAL AND SHOULD BE REPRESENTITIVE AND GERNERALIZABLE TO THE WIDER WORLD.

Page 6: Chal 3 final 2.5

Organization population size 1000Confidence interval 5%Confidence level 95%

n=286

(Israel, 2009)

Page 7: Chal 3 final 2.5

Criteria for Determining Effectiveness of the Translational Intervention(s)

EFFECTIVENESS

APPROPRIATENESS

Practicability (focus groups)

ADOPTION

Uptake (survey)

ACCEPTABILITYSatisfaction

of the innovation (survey)

FEASIBILITY

Suitable for everyday use

(survey)

FIDELITY

Adherence (check-lists)

SUSTAINABILITY

Continuation (interviews)

PENETRATION

Level of utilization (case audit)

Taxonomy of implementation outcomes (Proctor et al., 2011)

Page 8: Chal 3 final 2.5

Organizational Sustainability

Sustainability

Culture

Effectiveness

Stakeholders/ Champions

Integration

Page 9: Chal 3 final 2.5

Dynamic Sustainability Framework

Ecological System

Practice Setting

Intervention

• Other Practice Settings• Policy• Regulations• Market Forces• Population Charateristics

• Staffing• Org Culture• Models• Education

• Components• Practitioners• Outcomes• Delivery Platform

FIT

FIT

FIT

Adapted from Chambers et al, DSF Model (2013)

Page 10: Chal 3 final 2.5

Sustainability Strategies

SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES

Initial Planning

Key Participants

Integration with

Established Systems

ResourcesFinancial

Time Human

Ongoing Evaluation

Integration With EDSS

(Chambers et al., 2013; Shediac-Rizkallah & Bone, 1998; Scheirer, 2005)

Page 11: Chal 3 final 2.5

ReferencesAarons, G. A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2007). Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: Service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(4), 411-419. Bakken, S., & Ruland, C. M. (2009). Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: How can the

RE-AIM framework help? Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 16(6), 889-897. doi:10.1197/jamia.M3085; 10.1197/jamia.M3085

Bachetti, P., McCulloch, C.E., & Segal, M.R. (2008). Simple, defensible sample sizes based on cost efficiency. Biometrics, 64, 577-594. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01004.x

Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., . . . Fernandez, M. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452-457. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy2.library.arizona.edu/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002Brownson, R. C., & Jones, E. (2009). Bridging the gap: Translating research into policy and practice. Preventive Medicine, 49(4), 313-315. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.008; 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.008

Cain, M., & Mittman, R. (2002). Diffusion of innovation in health care. Retrieved from http://faculty.mercer.edu/thomas_bm/classes/641/Diffusion%20of%20Innovations%20in%20Health care.pdf Cain, M., & Mittman, R. (2002). Diffusion of innovation in health care. Retrieved from http://faculty.mercer.edu/thomas_bm/classes/641/Diffusion%20of%20Innovations%20in%20Health care.pdf Chambers, d., Glasgow, R. & Stange, K. (2013). The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implementation Science; 8:17.Fox, N., Hunn, A., & Mathers, N. (2009) Sampling and sample size calculation. Retrieved from National Institute for Health Research website: rds- eastmidlands.nihr.ac.uk/.../9-sampling-and-sample-size-calculation.ht.

Page 12: Chal 3 final 2.5

References

Gitlin, L. N. (2013). Introducing a new intervention: An overview of research phases and common challenges. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy

Association, 67(2), 177-184. doi:10.5014/ajot.2013.006742; 10.5014/ajot.2013.006742New York: Oxford Press.

Gladwell, M. (2000). The Tipping Point, How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Glasgow, R. E., McKay, H. G., Piette, J. D., & Reynolds, K. D. (2001). The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What

can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Education and Counseling, 44(2), 119-127.Grady, P.A. (2010). Translation Research and Nursing Science. Nursing Outlook, 58(3), 164-166.Israel, G.D. (2009). University of Florida. Determining sample size. Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/PD/

PD00600.pdfJohnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), 135-149. Nietert, P. J., Wessell, A. M., Jenkins, R. G., Feifer, C., Nemeth, L. S., & Ornstein, S. M. (2007). Using a summary measure for

multiple quality indicators in primary care: the Summary QUality InDex (SQUID). Implementation Science, 2(11), 1-34.

Mendel, P., Meredith, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., Sherbourne, C. D., & Wells, K. B. (2008). Interventions in organizational and community context: a framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1-2), 21-37.

Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A.,… Henesly, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(2), 65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

Rabin, B. A., Glasgow, R. E., Kerner, J. F., Klump, M. P., & Brownson, R. C. (2010). Dissemination and Implementation Research on Community-Based Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(4), 443-456. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.035

Page 13: Chal 3 final 2.5

References

Rabin, B. A., Brownson, R. C., Haire-Joshu, D., Kreuter, M. W., & Weaver, N. L. (2008). A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 117-123.

Rabin, B. A., Brownson, R. C., Kerner, J. F., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Methodologic Challenges in Disseminating Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Physical Activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4, Supplement), 24-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.009

Scheirer, M. (2005) Is Sustainability possible? A review and commentary on Empirical studies of program sustainability. American Journal of Evaluation. 26,(320). Retrieved from http://aje.sagepub.com/content/26/3/320

Shediac-Rizkallah, M. C., & Bone, L. R. (1998). Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Education Resource, 13(1), 87-108.

Shubert, T. E., Altpeter, M., & Busby-Whitehead, J. (2011). Using the RE-AIM framework to translate a research-based falls prevention intervention into a community-based program: Lessons learned. Journal of Safety Research, 42(6), 509-516. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2011.09.003; 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.09.003

Smith, J. R., & Donze, A. (2010). Assessing environmental readiness: First steps in developing an evidence-based practice implementation culture. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 24(1), 61-71; quiz 72-3. doi:10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181ce1357; 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181ce1357

Stiles, P., Boothroyd, R., Snyder, K., & Zong, X. (2002). Service penetration by persons with severe mental illness: How should it be measured? The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 29(2), 198-207. doi:0.1007/bf02287706

Tinetti, M. E., Baker, D. I., King, M., Gottschalk, M., Murphy, T. E., Acampora, D., . . . Allore, H. G. (2008). Effect of dissemination of evidence in reducing injuries from falls. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(3), 252-261. Vedel, I., Ghadi, V., De Stampa, M., Routelous, C., Bergman, H., Ankri, J., & Lapointe, L. (2013). Diffusion of a collaborative care

model in primary care: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 14 (3). doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-3.