Ch8_EQ_students
-
Upload
cresnick -
Category
Technology
-
view
389 -
download
0
Transcript of Ch8_EQ_students
Earthquakes
Vibrations in crust caused by shifting rock masses
Focus- point w/in crust where EQ originates
Epicenter – point on Earth’s surface directly above focus
Causes of Earthquakes
1) Volcanic eruptions- used for predictions
2) Crustal Rebound - weak EQ’s- caused by melting of continental ice sheets
Causes of Earthquakes
3) Elastic Rebound- pressure builds up in rocks
(potential energy)- once rx break, stored energy
is released (kinetic energy)- rx return to original shape
Fault
Fracture in crust where rocks have shifted
Two categories of faults:1) Dip-slip faults (vertical motion)2) Strike-slip faults (horizontal
motion)
Dip-Slip Faults
Vocabulary (mining terms):1) Fault Plane – fracture
surface 2) Footwall3) Hanging wall
Types of Dip-Slip Faults
1) Normal Fault- hanging wall moves down relative
to footwall- caused by tensional forces
Types of Dip-Slip Faults
2) Reverse Fault- hanging wall moves up relative
to footwall- caused by compressional
forces
Fault-Block Mountains
Bounded by normal faultsMountain = horst; valley =
grabenEx: Basin & Range Province in
Nevada & UtahEx: Teton Mountains, Wyoming
Strike-slip faults
Motion is horizontalSurface features are displaced:
Fences, railroad tracks, tree rows, stream channels
Ex: San Andreas Fault, CA
Body Waves:
a) Primary Waves (P-waves)- fastest- energy travels in push-pull motion (linear)- travel through solids, liquids, and gases
Body Waves:
b) Secondary waves (S-waves)- approx. half as fast as P-waves- energy travels at right angles to
path of motion- only travels through solids
Types of Seismic Waves
2) Surface waves- energy travels across surface- causes the most structural damage
Locating EQ Epicenters
KEY: Difference in arrival times between P- and S-waves
Farther apart = seismic station is further from epicenter
EQ Intensity Factors
1) Amount of energy released2) Distance from epicenter3) Type of surface material
- bedrock vs. sediment4) Building design5) Population Density
EQ Intensity
Measured using Mercalli Scale(Giuseppe Mercalli in 1902)- scale of I-XII based on damage
to location- not a measure of EQ’s actual
energy
Disadvantages of Mercalli Scale
1) Subjective2) Type of surface material
varies3) Building design varies4) No data for unpopulated areas
Richter Magnitude Scale
Measures largest amplitude of seismic waves on seismogram
Amplitude measures the ground shaking
Richter Magnitude Scale
Logarithmic scale (not linear!)Each higher number on Richter
Scale represents:a) 10 times more ground shakingb) 32 times more energy
released
Richter Magnitude Scale
2.0 Felt only by seismograph3.0 ____ x more energy than a 2.04.0 ____ x more energy than a 2.05.0 ____ x more energy than a 2.0
Richter Magnitude Scale
4.0-4.9 Felt by most people6.0-6.9 Destructive in populated
areas>8.0 Truly catastrophic EQ’s
Richter Magnitude Scale
Largest recorded U.S. EQ1964 Alaskan “Good Friday” EQ 9.2
Largest recorded EQ in world1960 Chile 9.6
Benefits of Richter Scale
1) Objective measurements from seismogram
2) Data available for unpopulated areas
Effects of EQ’s
3) Fault Scarp – cliff exposed by vertical movement along dip-slip fault
- used to measure growth rate of mountains
Effects of EQ’s
4) Liquefaction- occurs in sediment- vibrations release water
trapped between sediment grains“quick sand” or “quick clay”
Effects of EQ’s
5) Landslides- more prevalent if pre-existing weakness exists in rxEx: EQ Lake in Montana 1959
Effects of EQ’s
6) Tsunami – “harbor wave”- seismic sea wave (not tidal wave)- caused by dip-slip fault movement in ocean crust
Tsunami
Danger is from speed: between 500-950 km/hr
Ex: December 26, 2004- Indonesia: EQ of 9.0 offshore triggered tsunami- over 200,000 people killed
Effects of EQ’s
7) Fire – causes most property damage- liquefaction breaks buried gas & water pipelines Ex: Marina District in 1906 & 1989
EQ Prediction
EQ Prediction along San Andreas Fault
- best guess is 30-year estimate of likely EQ activity
- note Parkfield, CA
Earth’s Interior
Layers defined by physical properties & composition
Clues (indirect evidence): Seismic waves - variations in
speed & direction
Clues: seismic waves
1) P-waves speed up rapidly below 50 km depth within Earth
- marks a change in composition &/or physical state of the rocks
1909: Mohorovicic identified crust-mantle boundary
Clues: seismic waves
Within mantle:P-wave velocities slow back
down (100-660 km deep)- slower velocity zone is known
as the __________________
Asthenosphere
Weak layer in upper mantle- partially molten (~1-5%) which
slows P-waves down- not completely molten b/c S-
waves travel through it
Clues: seismic waves
Lithosphere – rigid rx of crust and uppermost mantle
Asthenosphere – weaker rocks (partially molten) in upper mantle
Clues: seismic waves
2) P-wave shadow zone- P-waves bend as they enter the
outer core3) S-wave shadow zoneS-waves disappear in outer core* Proof of liquid outer core