ch08

44
Information Technology Project Management by Jack T. Marchewka Power Point Slides by Jack T. Marchewka, Northern Illinois University Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. all rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained

description

vsdvsv

Transcript of ch08

Page 1: ch08

Information Technology Project

Managementby Jack T. Marchewka

Power Point Slides by Jack T. Marchewka, Northern Illinois University

Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. all rights reserved. Reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted in Section 117 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the express permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Request for further information information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. The purchaser may make back-up copies for his/her own use only and not for distribution or resale. The Publisher assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or damages caused by the use of these programs or from the use of the information contained herein.

Page 2: ch08

Chapter 8 Managing Project Risk

Page 3: ch08

Chapter 8 Objectives

• Describe the project risk management planning framework introduced in this chapter.

• Define risk identification and the causes, effects, and integrative nature of project risks.

• Apply several qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques that can be used to prioritize and analyze various project risks.

• Describe the various risk strategies, such as insurance, avoidance, or mitigation.

• Describe risk monitoring and control. • Describe risk evaluation in terms of how the entire risk

management process should be evaluated in order to learn from experience and to identify best practices.

Page 4: ch08

The Baseline Project Plan

• Is based on:– Our understanding of the current situation– The information available– The assumptions we make

Page 5: ch08

This Leads to Uncertainty

• Because…– Estimates are really forecasts or predictions– Uncertainty is highest at the beginning of the project

because we don’t all the information we would like to have

– Sometimes things happen that are out of our control

• Although no one can predict the future with 100% accuracy, having a solid foundation in terms pf the processes, tools, and techniques, can increase our confidence in these estimates.

Page 6: ch08

Some Common Mistakes

• Benefits of risk management are not well-understood– Just do it!

• Not providing adequate time for risk management– Should be part of the ITPM

• Not identifying and assessing risk using a standardized approach– Miss threats & opportunities

• Crisis management (i.e. firefighting) is “reactive”– Risk management is “proactive”– Cheaper & less embarrassing than crisis management

Page 7: ch08

Effective and Successful Project Risk Management Requires:

• Commitment by all stakeholders

• Stakeholder Responsibility– each risk must have an owner

• Different Risks for Different Types of Projects

Page 8: ch08

PMBOK® Risk Management Processes

• Risk Management Planning

• Risk Identification

• Qualitative Risk Analysis

• Quantitative Risk Analysis

• Risk Response Planning

• Risk Monitoring and Control

Page 9: ch08

 MIS Software

RisksSystems

Software RisksCommercial

Software RisksMilitary Software

Risks

Contract or Outsourced

Software Risks

End-User Software Risks

Creeping User

Requirements

80%

Long Schedul

es

70%

Inadequate User

Documentation

70%

Excessive Paper Work

 90% 

High Maintenanc

e Costs

 60% 

Non-transferab

le Applicati

on

80% 

Excessive Schedule Pressure

65%

Inadequate Cost Estimat

es

65%

Low User Satisfaction

55%

Low Productivit

y

85% 

Friction Between

Contractor & Client Personnel

50%

Hidden Errors

65%

Low Quality

 

60%

Excessive Paper

Work

60%

Excessive Time to Market

50%

Long Schedules

75%

Creeping User

Requirements

45%

Un-maintaina

ble Software

60%

Cost Overruns

55%

Error-prone

Modules

50%

Harmful Competitive

Actions

45%

Creeping User

Requirements

70%

Unanticipated

Acceptance Criteria

30%

Redundant

Application

50%

Inadequate Configuration Control

50%

Cancelled

Projects

25%

Litigation Expense

30%

Unused or Unusable software

45%

Legal Ownership of Software

& Deliverable

s

20%

Legal Ownershi

p of Software

and Deliverab

les

20%

Various Software Risks for IT Projects (source: Jones, 1994)

Page 10: ch08

PMBOK® Definitions

• Risk– An uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a

positive or negative effect on the project objectives.

• Risk Management– The systematic process of identifying, analyzing, and

responding to project risk. It includes maximizing the probability and consequences of positive events and minimizing the probability and consequences of adverse events.

Page 11: ch08

IT Project Risk Management Processes

Figure 8.1

Page 12: ch08

IT Project Risk Management Planning Process

• Risk Planning– Requires a firm commitment to risk

management from all project stakeholders– Ensures adequate resources to plan for and

manage risk– Focuses on preparation

Page 13: ch08

IT Project Risk Management Planning Process

• Risk Identification– Identify potential risks that can impact the

project• Includes both threats and opportunities

– Should include many of the project stakeholders

– The IT Project Risk Framework provides a tool for understanding the timing and interrelatedness of IT project risks

Page 14: ch08

IT Project Risk Management Framework

Figure 8.2

Page 15: ch08

Risk Management Tools For Identifying IT Project Risks

• Learning Cycles– Chapter 4

• Brainstorming• Nominal Group Technique• Delphi Technique• Checklists• SWOT Analysis• Cause & Effect (a.k.a. Fishbone/Ishikawa)• Past Projects

Page 16: ch08

Identifying IT Project Risks

• Nominal Group Technique (NGT) 1. Each individual silently writes her or his ideas on a piece of

paper2. Each idea is then written on a board or flip chart one at a

time in a round-robin fashion until each individual has listed all of his or her ideas.

3. The group then discusses and clarifies each of the ideas.4. Each individual then silently ranks and prioritizes the ideas. 5. The group then discusses the rankings and priorities of the

ideas. 6. Each individual ranks and prioritizes the ideas again. 7. The rankings and prioritizations are then summarized for the

group.

Page 17: ch08

Example of a Risk Check List

Funding for the project has been securedFunding for the project is sufficientFunding for the project has been approved by senior managementThe project team has the requisite skills to complete the projectThe project has adequate manpower to complete the projectThe project charter and project plan have been approved by senior management or the project sponsorThe project’s goal is realistic and achievableThe project’s schedule is realistic and achievableThe project’s scope has been clearly definedProcesses for scope changes have been clearly defined

Page 18: ch08

SWOT Analysis

Page 19: ch08

Cause and Effect Diagram

• Identify the risk in terms of a threat or opportunity.

• Identify the main factors that can cause the risk to occur.

• Identify detailed factors for each of the main factors.

• Continue refining the diagram until satisfied that the diagram is complete.

Page 20: ch08

Cause and Effect Diagram

Page 21: ch08

IT Project Risk Management Planning Process

• Risk Analysis– Risk = f(Probability * Impact)

• What is the probability of a particular risk occurring?

• What is the impact on the project if it does occur?

• Risk Assessment– Focuses on prioritizing risks so that an effective

strategy can be formulated for those risks that require a response.

• Depends on Stakeholder risk tolerances• You can’t respond to all risks!

Page 22: ch08

Risk Analysis and Assessment Tools

• Qualitative Approaches– Expected Value– Payoff Table– Decision Trees– Risk Impact Table– Tusler’s risk classification scheme

• Quantitative Approaches– Probability Distributions

• Discrete– Binomial

• Continuous– Normal– PERT– Triangular

– Simulations

Page 23: ch08

Expected Value of a Payoff Table

Schedule Risk A

Probability

B

Payoff (in 000s)

A + B

Prob. * Payoff

Project completed

20 days early

5% $200 $10

Project completed

10 days early

20% $150 $30

Project completed

on schedule

50% $100 $50

Project completed

10 days late

20% $ -- $ --

Project completed

20 days late

5% $ (50) $ (3)

100% $88

Expected Value

Page 24: ch08

Decision Tree Analysis

Figure 8.5

Page 25: ch08

Tusler’s Risk Classification Scheme

Figure 8.6

Page 26: ch08

Binomial Probability Distribution

Page 27: ch08

Normal Distribution

• Shape is determined by its mean (µ) and standard deviation ()

• Probability is associated with area under the curve.

• Since the distribution is symmetrical, the following probability rules of thumb apply – About 68 percent of all the values will fall between +1

of the mean – About 95 percent of all the values will fall between +2

of the mean – About 99 percent of all the values will fall between +3

of the mean

Page 28: ch08

Normal Distribution

Page 29: ch08

PERT Distribution

• PERT distribution uses a three-point estimate where: – a denotes an optimistic estimate – b denotes a most likely estimate – c denotes a pessimistic estimate

• PERT Mean = (a + 4m + b) / 6

• PERT Standard Deviation = (b - a) / 6

Page 30: ch08

PERT Distribution

Page 31: ch08

Triangular Distribution

• uses a three-point estimate similar to the PERT distribution where: – a denotes an optimistic estimate – b denotes a most likely estimate – c denotes a pessimistic estimate

• weighting for the mean and standard deviation are different from PERT– TRIANG Mean = (a + m + b) / 3 – TRIANG Standard Deviation =

[((b-a)2 + (m-a)(m-b)) /18]1/2

Page 32: ch08

Triangular Distribution

Page 33: ch08

Simulations

• Monte Carlo– a technique that randomly generates specific

values for a variable with a specific probability distribution.

– goes through a specific number of iterations or trials and records the outcome.

– @risk

• Sensitivity Analysis– Tornado Graph

Page 34: ch08

Risk Simulation Using @RiskRisk Simulation Using @Risk™™ for Microsoft Projectfor Microsoft Project

Page 35: ch08

Output from Monte Carlo Simulation

Figure 8.12

Page 36: ch08

Cumulative Probability Distribution

Figure 813

Page 37: ch08

Sensitivity Analysis Using a Tornado Graph

Figure 8.14

Page 38: ch08

Risk Strategies

• Depends On:– The nature of the risk itself

• Really a threat or an opportunity?– The impact of the risk on the project’s MOV and

objectives• What is the probability and impact of a risk

– The project’s constraints in terms of scope, schedule, budget, and quality

• Can a response be made with existing resources and/or constraints?

– Risk Tolerances or preferences of the project stakeholders

• How much risk is tolerable?

Page 39: ch08

IT Project Risk Management Planning Process

• Risk Strategies– Accept or ignore the risk.

• Management Reserves

• Contingency Reserves

• Contingency Plans

– Avoid the risk completely.

– Reduce the likelihood or impact of the risk (or both) if the risk occurs.

– Transfer the risk to someone else (i.e., insurance).

Page 40: ch08

Risk Response Plan should include:

• The project risk • The trigger which flags that the risk has occurred • The owner of the risk (i.e., the person or group

responsible for monitoring the risk and ensuring that the appropriate risk response is carried out)

• A risk response based on one of the four basic risk strategies

Figure 8.15

Page 41: ch08

IT Project Risk Management Planning Process

• Risk Monitoring and Control

• Risk Response

• Risk Evaluation– How did we do? – What can we do better next time? – What lessons did we learn? – What best practices can be incorporated in

the risk management process?

Page 42: ch08

Risk Monitoring and Control

• Tools for monitoring and controlling project risk– Risk Audits by external people– Risk Reviews by internal team members– Risk Status Meetings and Reports

Page 43: ch08

Project Risk Radar

Figure 8.16

Monitoring projectrisks is analogousto a radar scope where threat andopportunities maypresent themselvesat different times

Page 44: ch08

Risk Response and Evaluation

• Lessons learned and best practices help us to: – Increase our understanding of IT project risk in

general. – Understand what information was available to

managing risks and for making risk-related decisions. – Understand how and why a particular decision was

made. – Understand the implications not only of the risks but

also the decisions that were made. – Learn from our experience so that others may not

have to repeat our mistakes.