Ch04 Capm and Apt
-
Upload
amit-pandey -
Category
Documents
-
view
67 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Ch04 Capm and Apt
![Page 1: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Chapter 4
CAPM & APT
Asst. Prof. Dr. Mete Feridun
![Page 2: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Capital Market Theory: An Overview
Capital market theory extends portfolio theory and develops a model for pricing all risky assets
Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) will allow you to determine the required rate of return for any risky asset
![Page 3: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
The asset pricing models aim to use the concepts of portfolio valuation and market equilibrium in order to determine the market price for risk and appropriate measure of risk for a single asset.
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) has an observation that the returns on a financial asset increase with the risk. CAPM concerns two types of risk namely unsystematic and systematic risks. The central principle of the CAPM is that, systematic risk, as measured by beta, is the only factor affecting the level of return.
![Page 4: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) was
developed independently by Sharpe (1964), Lintner (1965) and Mossin (1966) as a financial model of the relation of risk to expected return for the practical world of finance.
CAPM originally depends on the mean variance theory which was demonstrated by Markowitz’s portfolio selection model (1952) aiming higher average returns with lower risk.
![Page 5: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Equilibrium model that underlies all modern financial theory
Derived using principles of diversification with simplified assumptions
Markowitz, Sharpe, Lintner and Mossin are researchers credited with its development5
![Page 6: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
![Page 7: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Capital Asset Pricing Model Introduction Systematic and unsystematic risk Fundamental risk/return relationship
revisited
![Page 8: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Introduction The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
is a theoretical description of the way in which the market prices investment assets• The CAPM is a positive theory
![Page 9: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Systematic and Unsystematic Risk
Unsystematic risk can be diversified and is irrelevant
Systematic risk cannot be diversified and is relevant• Measured by beta
– Beta determines the level of expected return on a security or portfolio (SML)
![Page 10: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Fundamental Risk/Return Relationship Revisited
CAPM SML and CAPM Market model versus CAPM Note on the CAPM assumptions Stationarity of beta
![Page 11: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
CAPM The more risk you carry, the greater the
expected return:
( ) ( )
where ( ) expected return on security
risk-free rate of interest
beta of Security
( ) expected return on the market
i f i m f
i
f
i
m
E R R E R R
E R i
R
i
E R
![Page 12: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
CAPM (cont’d) The CAPM deals with expectations about
the future
Excess returns on a particular stock are directly related to:• The beta of the stock• The expected excess return on the market
![Page 13: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
CAPM (cont’d) CAPM assumptions:
• Variance of return and mean return are all investors care about
• Investors are price takers– They cannot influence the market individually
• All investors have equal and costless access to information
• There are no taxes or commission costs
![Page 14: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
CAPM (cont’d) CAPM assumptions (cont’d):
• Investors look only one period ahead
• Everyone is equally adept at analyzing securities and interpreting the news
![Page 15: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
SML and CAPM If you show the security market
line with excess returns on the vertical axis, the equation of the SML is the CAPM • The intercept is zero
• The slope of the line is beta
![Page 16: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Market Model Versus CAPM The market model is an ex post model
• It describes past price behavior
The CAPM is an ex ante model• It predicts what a value should be
![Page 17: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Market Model Versus CAPM (cont’d)
The market model is:
( )
where return on Security in period
intercept
beta for Security
return on the market in period
error term on Security in period
it i i mt it
it
i
i
mt
it
R R e
R i t
i
R t
e i t
![Page 18: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Note on the CAPM Assumptions
Several assumptions are unrealistic:• People pay taxes and commissions
• Many people look ahead more than one period
• Not all investors forecast the same distribution
Theory is useful to the extent that it helps us learn more about the way the world acts• Empirical testing shows that the CAPM works
reasonably well
![Page 19: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Stationarity of Beta Beta is not stationary
• Evidence that weekly betas are less than monthly betas, especially for high-beta stocks
• Evidence that the stationarity of beta increases as the estimation period increases
The informed investment manager knows that betas change
![Page 20: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Equity Risk Premium Equity risk premium refers to the
difference in the average return between stocks and some measure of the risk-free rate• The equity risk premium in the CAPM is the
excess expected return on the market
• Some researchers are proposing that the size of the equity risk premium is shrinking
![Page 21: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Using A Scatter Diagram to Measure Beta
Correlation of returns Linear regression and beta Importance of logarithms Statistical significance
![Page 22: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Correlation of Returns Much of the daily news is of a general
economic nature and affects all securities• Stock prices often move as a group
• Some stock routinely move more than the others regardless of whether the market advances or declines
– Some stocks are more sensitive to changes in economic conditions
![Page 23: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Linear Regression and Beta To obtain beta with a linear regression:
• Plot a stock’s return against the market return
• Use Excel to run a linear regression and obtain the coefficients
– The coefficient for the market return is the beta statistic
– The intercept is the trend in the security price returns that is inexplicable by finance theory
![Page 24: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Importance of Logarithms Taking the logarithm of returns reduces the
impact of outliers• Outliers distort the general relationship
• Using logarithms will have more effect the more outliers there are
![Page 25: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Statistical Significance Published betas are not always useful
numbers• Individual securities have substantial
unsystematic risk and will behave differently than beta predicts
• Portfolio betas are more useful since some unsystematic risk is diversified away
![Page 26: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
CAPM Assumptions
Individual investors are price takers Single-period investment horizon Investments are limited to traded financial assets No taxes, and transaction costs Information is costless and available to all
investors Investors are rational mean-variance optimizers Homogeneous expectations
![Page 27: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Assumptions Asset markets are frictionless and information
liquidity is high. All investors are price takers; so that, they are not able
to influence the market price by their actions. All investors have homogenous expectations about
asset returns and what the uncertain future holds for them.
All investors are risk averse and they operate in the market rationally and perceive utility in terms of expected return.
![Page 28: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Assumptions (cont.) All investors are operating in perfect markets which
enables them to operate without tax payments on returns and without cost of transactions entailed in trading securities.
All securities are highly divisible for instance they can be traded in small parcels (Elton and Gruber, 1995, p.294).
All investors can lend and borrow unlimited amount of funds at the risk-free rate of return.
All investors have single period investment time horizon in means of different expectations from their investments leads them to operate for short or long term returns from their investments.
![Page 29: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
1. All investors are Markowitz efficient investors who want to target points on the efficient frontier. • The exact location on the efficient frontier and,
therefore, the specific portfolio selected, will depend on the individual investor’s risk-return utility function.
![Page 30: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
2. Investors can borrow or lend any amount of money at the risk-free rate of return (RFR). • Clearly it is always possible to lend money at
the nominal risk-free rate by buying risk-free securities such as government T-bills. It is not always possible to borrow at this risk-free rate, but we will see that assuming a higher borrowing rate does not change the general results.
![Page 31: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
3. All investors have homogeneous expectations; that is, they estimate identical probability distributions for future rates of return.• Again, this assumption can be relaxed. As long
as the differences in expectations are not vast, their effects are minor.
![Page 32: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
4. All investors have the same one-period time horizon such as one-month, six months, or one year. • The model will be developed for a single
hypothetical period, and its results could be affected by a different assumption. A difference in the time horizon would require investors to derive risk measures and risk-free assets that are consistent with their time horizons.
![Page 33: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
5. All investments are infinitely divisible, which means that it is possible to buy or sell fractional shares of any asset or portfolio. • This assumption allows us to discuss
investment alternatives as continuous curves. Changing it would have little impact on the theory.
![Page 34: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
6. There are no taxes or transaction costs involved in buying or selling assets. • This is a reasonable assumption in many
instances. Neither pension funds nor religious groups have to pay taxes, and the transaction costs for most financial institutions are less than 1 percent on most financial instruments. Again, relaxing this assumption modifies the results, but does not change the basic thrust.
![Page 35: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
7. There is no inflation or any change in interest rates, or inflation is fully anticipated.• This is a reasonable initial assumption, and it
can be modified.
![Page 36: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
8. Capital markets are in equilibrium.• This means that we begin with all investments
properly priced in line with their risk levels.
![Page 37: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Assumptions of Capital Market Theory
Some of these assumptions are unrealistic Relaxing many of these assumptions would
have only minor influence on the model and would not change its main implications or conclusions.
A theory should be judged on how well it explains and helps predict behavior, not on its assumptions.
![Page 38: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Resulting Equilibrium Conditions
All investors will hold the same portfolio for risky assets – market portfolio
Market portfolio contains all securities and the proportion of each security is its market value as a percentage of total market value
Risk premium on the market depends on the average risk aversion of all market participants
Risk premium on an individual security is a function of its covariance with the market
![Page 39: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Capital Market Line
If a fully diversified investor is able to invest in the market portfolio and lend or borrow at the risk free rate of return, the alternative risk and return relationships can be generally placed around a market line which is called the Capital Market Line (CML).
![Page 40: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Security Market Line
The SML shows the relationship between risk measured by beta and expected return. The model states that the stock’s expected return is equal to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium obtained by the price of the risk multiplied by the quantity of the risk.
![Page 41: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
E(r)E(r)
E(rE(rMM))
rrff
MMCMLCML
mm
Capital Market Line
![Page 42: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
E(r)E(r)
E(rE(rMM))
rrff
SMLSML
MMßßßß = 1.0= 1.0
Security Market Line
![Page 43: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Capital Market Line
CML: E(rp)= rF+ λσp
E(rp): Expected return on portfolio
rF : Return on the risk free asset λ : Market price risk σp : Market portfolio risk
![Page 44: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
M = Market portfoliorf = Risk free rate
E(rM) - rf = Market risk premium
E(rM) - rf = Market price of risk
= Slope of the CAPM
Slope and Market Risk Premium
MM
![Page 45: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
SML Relationships
= [COV(ri,rm)] / m
2
Slope SML = E(rm) - rf
= market risk premium
SML = rf + [E(rm) - rf]
(σSpS,M) is the market price of risk
SML: E(rS)=rF+ λσSpS,M
![Page 46: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Expected Return and Risk on Individual Securities
The risk premium on individual securities is a function of the individual security’s contribution to the risk of the market portfolio
Individual security’s risk premium is a function of the covariance of returns with the assets that make up the market portfolio
![Page 47: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Exercise
If E(rm) - rf = .08 and rf = .03
Calculate exp. ret. based on betas given below:
x = 1.25
E(rx) = .03 + 1.25(.08) = .13 or 13%
y = .6
E(ry) = .03 + .6(.08) = .078 or 7.8%
![Page 48: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
E(r)E(r)
RRxx=13%=13%
SMLSML
mm
ßß
ßß1.01.0
RRmm=11%=11%RRyy=7.8%=7.8%
3%3%
xxßß1.251.25
yyßß.6.6
.08.08
Graph of Sample Calculations
![Page 49: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Disequilibrium Example
Suppose a security with a beta of 1.25 is offering expected return of 15%
According to SML, it should be 13% So the security is underpriced: offering too
high of a rate of return for its level of risk
![Page 50: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Risk-Free Asset An asset with zero standard deviation Zero correlation with all other risky assets Provides the risk-free rate of return (RFR) Will lie on the vertical axis of a portfolio
graph
![Page 51: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Risk-Free AssetCovariance between two sets of returns is
n
1ijjiiij )]/nE(R-)][RE(R-[RCov
Because the returns for the risk free asset are certain,
0RF Thus Ri = E(Ri), and Ri - E(Ri) = 0
Consequently, the covariance of the risk-free asset with any risky asset or portfolio will always equal zero. Similarly the correlation between any risky asset and the risk-free asset would be zero.
![Page 52: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Risky Portfolio
Expected return
the weighted average of the two returns
))E(RW-(1(RFR)W)E(R iRFRFport
This is a linear relationship
![Page 53: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Risky Portfolio
Standard deviation
The expected variance for a two-asset portfolio is
211,22122
22
21
21
2port rww2ww)E(
Substituting the risk-free asset for Security 1, and the risky asset for Security 2, this formula would become
iRFiRF iRF,RFRF22
RF22
RF2port )rw-(1w2)w1(w)E(
Since we know that the variance of the risk-free asset is zero and the correlation between the risk-free asset and any risky asset i is zero we can adjust the formula
22RF
2port )w1()E( i
![Page 54: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Risky Portfolio
Given the variance formula22
RF2port )w1()E( i
22RFport )w1()E( i the standard deviation is
i)w1( RF
Therefore, the standard deviation of a portfolio that combines the risk-free asset with risky assets is the linear proportion of the standard deviation of the risky asset portfolio.
![Page 55: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Combining a Risk-Free Asset with a Risky Portfolio
Since both the expected return and the standard deviation of return for such a portfolio are linear combinations, a graph of possible portfolio returns and risks looks like a straight line between the two assets.
![Page 56: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Portfolio Possibilities Combining the Risk-Free Asset and Risky Portfolios on the Efficient Frontier
)E( port
)E(R port
RFR
M
C
AB
D
![Page 57: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Risk-Return Possibilities with LeverageTo attain a higher expected return than is available at point M (in exchange for accepting higher risk)
Either invest along the efficient frontier beyond point M, such as point D
Or, add leverage to the portfolio by borrowing money at the risk-free rate and investing in the risky portfolio at point M
![Page 58: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Capital Market Line - CML A line used in the capital asset pricing
model to illustrate the rates of return for efficient portfolios depending on the risk-free rate of return and the level of risk (standard deviation) for a particular portfolio.
![Page 59: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
Portfolio Possibilities Combining the Risk-Free Asset and Risky Portfolios on the Efficient Frontier
)E( port
)E(R port
RFR
M
CML
Borrowing
Lending
![Page 60: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
An Exercise to Produce the Efficient Frontier Using Three
Assets
Risk, Return and Portfolio Theory
![Page 61: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
An Exercise using T-bills, Stocks and Bonds
Base Data: Stocks T-bills BondsExpected Return(%) 12.73383 6.151702 7.0078723
Standard Deviation (%) 0.168 0.042 0.102
Correlation Coefficient Matrix:Stocks 1 -0.216 0.048T-bills -0.216 1 0.380Bonds 0.048 0.380 1
Portfolio Combinations:
Combination Stocks T-bills BondsExpected Return Variance
Standard Deviation
1 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.7 0.0283 16.8%2 90.0% 10.0% 0.0% 12.1 0.0226 15.0%3 80.0% 20.0% 0.0% 11.4 0.0177 13.3%4 70.0% 30.0% 0.0% 10.8 0.0134 11.6%5 60.0% 40.0% 0.0% 10.1 0.0097 9.9%6 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 9.4 0.0067 8.2%7 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 8.8 0.0044 6.6%8 30.0% 70.0% 0.0% 8.1 0.0028 5.3%9 20.0% 80.0% 0.0% 7.5 0.0018 4.2%10 10.0% 90.0% 0.0% 6.8 0.0014 3.8%
Weights Portfolio
Historical averages for
returns and risk for three asset
classes
Historical correlation coefficients
between the asset classes
Portfolio characteristics for each combination of securities
Each achievable portfolio combination is plotted on expected return, risk (σ) space, found on the following slide.
![Page 62: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
Achievable PortfoliosResults Using only Three Asset Classes
Attainable Portfolio Combinationsand Efficient Set of Portfolio Combinations
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
Standard Deviation of the Portfolio (%)
Po
rtfo
lio E
xpec
ted
Ret
urn
(%
) Efficient Set
Minimum Variance
Portfolio
The plotted points are attainable portfolio
combinations.
The efficient set is that set of achievable portfolio
combinations that offer the highest rate of return for a
given level of risk. The solid blue line indicates the efficient
set.
![Page 63: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
Achievable Two-Security Portfolios
Modern Portfolio Theory8 - 9 FIGURE
Ex
pe
cte
d R
etu
rn %
Standard Deviation (%)
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
This line represents the set of portfolio combinations that are achievable by varying relative weights and using two non-correlated securities.
![Page 64: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
64
Efficient FrontierThe Two-Asset Portfolio Combinations
A is not attainable
B,E lie on the efficient frontier and are attainable
E is the minimum variance portfolio (lowest risk combination)
C, D are attainable but are dominated by superior portfolios that line on the line
above E
8 - 10 FIGURE
Ex
pe
cte
d R
etu
rn %
Standard Deviation (%)
A
E
B
C
D
![Page 65: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
65
Efficient FrontierThe Two-Asset Portfolio Combinations
8 - 10 FIGURE
Ex
pe
cte
d R
etu
rn %
Standard Deviation (%)
A
E
B
C
D
Rational, risk averse investors will only want to hold portfolios such as B.
The actual choice will depend on her/his risk preferences.
![Page 66: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
66
The Market Portfolio Because portfolio M lies at the point of
tangency, it has the highest portfolio possibility line
Everybody will want to invest in Portfolio M and borrow or lend to be somewhere on the CML
Therefore this portfolio must include ALL RISKY ASSETS
![Page 67: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
67
The Market PortfolioBecause the market is in equilibrium, all assets are included in this portfolio in proportion to their market value
![Page 68: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
68
The Market PortfolioBecause it contains all risky assets, it is a completely diversified portfolio, which means that all the unique risk of individual assets (unsystematic risk) is diversified away
![Page 69: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
69
Systematic Risk Only systematic risk remains in the market
portfolio Systematic risk is the variability in all risky
assets caused by macroeconomic variables Systematic risk can be measured by the
standard deviation of returns of the market portfolio and can change over time
![Page 70: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
70
Examples of Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Systematic Risk Variability in growth of money supply Interest rate volatility Variability in
• industrial production• corporate earnings• cash flow
![Page 71: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
71
How to Measure Diversification All portfolios on the CML are perfectly
positively correlated with each other and with the completely diversified market Portfolio M
A completely diversified portfolio would have a correlation with the market portfolio of +1.00
![Page 72: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
72
Diversification and the Elimination of Unsystematic Risk The purpose of diversification is to reduce the
standard deviation of the total portfolio This assumes that imperfect correlations exist
among securities As you add securities, you expect the average
covariance for the portfolio to decline How many securities must you add to obtain a
completely diversified portfolio?
![Page 73: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
73
Diversification and the Elimination of Unsystematic Risk
Observe what happens as you increase the sample size of the portfolio by adding securities that have some positive correlation
![Page 74: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
74
Number of Stocks in a Portfolio and the Standard Deviation of Portfolio Return
Standard Deviation of Return
Number of Stocks in the Portfolio
Standard Deviation of the Market Portfolio (systematic risk)
Systematic Risk
Total Risk
Unsystematic (diversifiable) Risk
![Page 75: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
75
The CML and the Separation Theorem The CML leads all investors to invest in the M
portfolio Individual investors should differ in position on
the CML depending on risk preferences How an investor gets to a point on the CML is
based on financing decisions Risk averse investors will lend part of the
portfolio at the risk-free rate and invest the remainder in the market portfolio
![Page 76: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
76
A Risk Measure for the CML Covariance with the M portfolio is the
systematic risk of an asset The Markowitz portfolio model considers
the average covariance with all other assets in the portfolio
The only relevant portfolio is the M portfolio
![Page 77: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
77
A Risk Measure for the CMLTogether, this means the only important consideration is the asset’s covariance with the market portfolio
![Page 78: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
78
A Risk Measure for the CMLBecause all individual risky assets are part of the M portfolio, an
asset’s rate of return in relation to the return for the M portfolio may be described using the following linear model:
Miiiit RbaRwhere:
Rit = return for asset i during period t
ai = constant term for asset i
bi = slope coefficient for asset i
RMt = return for the M portfolio during period t
= random error term
![Page 79: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
79
Variance of Returns for a Risky Asset)Rba(Var)Var(R Miiiit
)(Var)Rb(Var)a(Var Miii )(Var)Rb(Var0 Mii
risk icunsystemator portfoliomarket the
torelatednot return residual theis )(Var
risk systematicor return market to
related varianceis )Rb(Var that Note Mii
![Page 80: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
80
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Expected Return and Risk
The existence of a risk-free asset resulted in deriving a capital market line (CML) that became the relevant frontier
An asset’s covariance with the market portfolio is the relevant risk measure
This can be used to determine an appropriate expected rate of return on a risky asset - the capital asset pricing model (CAPM)
![Page 81: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
81
The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Expected Return and Risk
CAPM indicates what should be the expected or required rates of return on risky assets
This helps to value an asset by providing an appropriate discount rate to use in dividend valuation models
You can compare an estimated rate of return to the required rate of return implied by CAPM - over/under valued ?
![Page 82: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
82
The Security Market Line (SML) The relevant risk measure for an individual
risky asset is its covariance with the market portfolio (Covi,m)
This is shown as the risk measure The return for the market portfolio should
be consistent with its own risk, which is the covariance of the market with itself - or its variance: 2
m
![Page 83: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
83
Graph of Security Market Line (SML)
)E(R i
Exhibit 8.5
RFR
imCov2m
mR
SML
![Page 84: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
84
The Security Market Line (SML)The equation for the risk-return line is
)Cov(RFR-R
RFR)E(R Mi,2M
Mi
RFR)-R(Cov
RFR M2M
Mi,
2M
Mi,Cov
We then define as beta
RFR)-(RRFR)E(R Mi i
)( i
![Page 85: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
85
Graph of SML with Normalized Systematic Risk
)E(R i
Exhibit 8.6
)Beta(Cov 2Mim/0.1
mR
SML
0
Negative Beta
RFR
![Page 86: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
86
Determining the Expected Rate of Return for a Risky Asset
The expected rate of return of a risk asset is determined by the RFR plus a risk premium for the individual asset
The risk premium is determined by the systematic risk of the asset (beta) and the prevailing market risk premium (RM-RFR)
RFR)-(RRFR)E(R Mi i
![Page 87: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
87
Determining the Expected Rate of Return for a Risky Asset
Assume: RFR = 6% (0.06)
RM = 12% (0.12)
Implied market risk premium = 6% (0.06)
Stock Beta
A 0.70B 1.00C 1.15D 1.40E -0.30
RFR)-(RRFR)E(R Mi i
E(RA) = 0.06 + 0.70 (0.12-0.06) = 0.102 = 10.2%
E(RB) = 0.06 + 1.00 (0.12-0.06) = 0.120 = 12.0%
E(RC) = 0.06 + 1.15 (0.12-0.06) = 0.129 = 12.9%
E(RD) = 0.06 + 1.40 (0.12-0.06) = 0.144 = 14.4%
E(RE) = 0.06 + -0.30 (0.12-0.06) = 0.042 = 4.2%
![Page 88: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
88
Determining the Expected Rate of Return for a Risky Asset
In equilibrium, all assets and all portfolios of assets should plot on the SML
Any security with an estimated return that plots above the SML is underpriced
Any security with an estimated return that plots below the SML is overpriced
A superior investor must derive value estimates for assets that are consistently superior to the consensus market evaluation to earn better risk-adjusted rates of return than the average investor
![Page 89: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
89
Identifying Undervalued and Overvalued Assets
Compare the required rate of return to the expected rate of return for a specific risky asset using the SML over a specific investment horizon to determine if it is an appropriate investment
Independent estimates of return for the securities provide price and dividend outlooks
![Page 90: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
90
Price, Dividend, and Rate of Return Estimates
Stock (Pi) Expected Price (Pt+1) (Dt+1) of Return (Percent)
A 25 27 0.50 10.0 %B 40 42 0.50 6.2C 33 39 1.00 21.2D 64 65 1.10 3.3E 50 54 0.00 8.0
Current Price Expected Dividend Expected Future Rate
Exhibit 8.7
![Page 91: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
91
Comparison of Required Rate of Return to Estimated Rate of Return
Stock Beta E(Ri) Estimated Return Minus E(Ri) Evaluation
A 0.70 10.2% 10.0 -0.2 Properly ValuedB 1.00 12.0% 6.2 -5.8 OvervaluedC 1.15 12.9% 21.2 8.3 UndervaluedD 1.40 14.4% 3.3 -11.1 OvervaluedE -0.30 4.2% 8.0 3.8 Undervalued
Required Return Estimated Return
Exhibit 8.8
![Page 92: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
92
Plot of Estimated Returnson SML Graph
Exhibit 8.9)E(R i
Beta0.1
mRSML
0 .20 .40 .60 .80 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80-.40 -.20
.22 .20 .18 .16 .14 .12 Rm .10 .08 .06 .04 .02
AB
C
D
E
![Page 93: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
93
Calculating Systematic Risk: The Characteristic Line
The systematic risk input of an individual asset is derived from a regression model, referred to as the asset’s characteristic line with the model portfolio:
tM,iiti, RRwhere: Ri,t = the rate of return for asset i during period tRM,t = the rate of return for the market portfolio M during t
miii R-R
2M
Mi,Cov
i
error term random the
![Page 94: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
94
Scatter Plot of Rates of ReturnExhibit 8.10
RM
RiThe characteristic line is the regression line of the best fit through a scatter plot of rates of return
![Page 95: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
95
The Impact of the Time Interval Number of observations and time interval used in
regression vary Value Line Investment Services (VL) uses weekly
rates of return over five years Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith (ML) uses
monthly return over five years There is no “correct” interval for analysis Weak relationship between VL & ML betas due to
difference in intervals used The return time interval makes a difference, and its
impact increases as the firm’s size declines
![Page 96: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
96
The Effect of the Market Proxy The market portfolio of all risky assets must
be represented in computing an asset’s characteristic line
Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index is most often used• Large proportion of the total market value of
U.S. stocks• Value weighted series
![Page 97: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
97
Weaknesses of Using S&P 500as the Market Proxy
• Includes only U.S. stocks • The theoretical market portfolio should include
U.S. and non-U.S. stocks and bonds, real estate, coins, stamps, art, antiques, and any other marketable risky asset from around the world
![Page 98: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
98
Relaxing the Assumptions Differential Borrowing and Lending Rates
• Heterogeneous Expectations and Planning Periods
Zero Beta Model• does not require a risk-free asset
Transaction Costs• with transactions costs, the SML will be a band
of securities, rather than a straight line
![Page 99: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
99
Relaxing the Assumptions Heterogeneous Expectations and Planning
Periods• will have an impact on the CML and SML
Taxes• could cause major differences in the CML and
SML among investors
![Page 100: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
100
Empirical Tests of the CAPM Stability of Beta
• betas for individual stocks are not stable, but portfolio betas are reasonably stable. Further, the larger the portfolio of stocks and longer the period, the more stable the beta of the portfolio
Comparability of Published Estimates of Beta
• differences exist. Hence, consider the return interval used and the firm’s relative size
![Page 101: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
101
Relationship Between Systematic Risk and Return
Effect of Skewness on Relationship• investors prefer stocks with high positive
skewness that provide an opportunity for very large returns
Effect of Size, P/E, and Leverage• size, and P/E have an inverse impact on returns
after considering the CAPM. Financial Leverage also helps explain cross-section of returns
![Page 102: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
102
Relationship Between Systematic Risk and Return
Effect of Book-to-Market Value• Fama and French questioned the relationship
between returns and beta in their seminal 1992 study. They found the BV/MV ratio to be a key determinant of returns
Summary of CAPM Risk-Return Empirical Results• the relationship between beta and rates of return
is a moot point
![Page 103: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
103
The Market Portfolio: Theory versus Practice
There is a controversy over the market portfolio. Hence, proxies are used
There is no unanimity about which proxy to use An incorrect market proxy will affect both the beta
risk measures and the position and slope of the SML that is used to evaluate portfolio performance
![Page 104: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
104
What is Next? Alternative asset pricing models
![Page 105: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
105
Summary
The dominant line is tangent to the efficient frontier• Referred to as the capital market line (CML)• All investors should target points along this line
depending on their risk preferences
![Page 106: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
106
Summary All investors want to invest in the risky
portfolio, so this market portfolio must contain all risky assets• The investment decision and financing decision
can be separated
• Everyone wants to invest in the market portfolio
• Investors finance based on risk preferences
![Page 107: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
107
Summary The relevant risk measure for an individual
risky asset is its systematic risk or covariance with the market portfolio• Once you have determined this Beta measure
and a security market line, you can determine the required return on a security based on its systematic risk
![Page 108: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
108
Summary
Assuming security markets are not always completely efficient, you can identify undervalued and overvalued securities by comparing your estimate of the rate of return on an investment to its required rate of return
![Page 109: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
109
Summary When we relax several of the major
assumptions of the CAPM, the required modifications are relatively minor and do not change the overall concept of the model.
![Page 110: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
110
Summary Betas of individual stocks are not stable
while portfolio betas are stable There is a controversy about the
relationship between beta and rate of return on stocks
Changing the proxy for the market portfolio results in significant differences in betas, SMLs, and expected returns
![Page 111: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
111
Arbitrage Pricing Theory APT background The APT model Comparison of the CAPM and the APT
![Page 112: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
112
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
Arbitrage Pricing Theory was developed by Stephen Ross (1976). His theory begins with an analysis of how investors construct efficient portfolios and offers a new approach for explaining the asset prices and states that the return on any risky asset is a linear combination of various macroeconomic factors that are not explained by this theory namely.
Similar to CAPM it assumes that investors are fully diversified and the systematic risk is an influencing factor in the long run. However, unlike CAPM model APT specifies a simple linear relationship between asset returns and the associated factors because each share or portfolio may have a different set of risk factors and a different degree of sensitivity to each of them.
![Page 113: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
113
APT Background Arbitrage pricing theory (APT) states that a
number of distinct factors determine the market return• Roll and Ross state that a security’s long-run
return is a function of changes in:– Inflation– Industrial production– Risk premiums– The slope of the term structure of interest rates
![Page 114: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
114
APT Background (cont’d) Not all analysts are concerned with the
same set of economic information• A single market measure such as beta does not
capture all the information relevant to the price of a stock
![Page 115: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
115
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) CAPM is criticized because of the
difficulties in selecting a proxy for the market portfolio as a benchmark
An alternative pricing theory with fewer assumptions was developed:
Arbitrage Pricing Theory
![Page 116: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
116
The Assumptions of APT Capital asset returns’ properties are consistent
with a linear structure of the factors. The returns can be described by a factor model.
Either there are no arbitrage opportunities in the capital markets or the markets have perfect competition.
The number of the economic securities are either inestimable or so large that the law of large number can be applied that makes it possible to form portfolios that diversify the firm specific risk of individual stocks.
Lastly, the number of the factors can be estimated by the investor or known in advance (K. C. John Wei, 1988)
![Page 117: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
117
![Page 118: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
118
Arbitrage Pricing Theory - APTThree major assumptions:
1. Capital markets are perfectly competitive
2. Investors always prefer more wealth to less wealth with certainty
3. The stochastic process generating asset returns can be expressed as a linear function of a set of K factors or indexes
![Page 119: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
119
Assumptions of CAPMThat Were Not Required by APTAPT does not assume A market portfolio that contains all risky
assets, and is mean-variance efficient Normally distributed security returns Quadratic utility function
![Page 120: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
120
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
For i = 1 to N where:
= return on asset i during a specified time period
ikikiiiitt bbbER ...21
Ri
![Page 121: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
121
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
For i = 1 to N where:
= return on asset i during a specified time period
= expected return for asset i
ikikiiiitt bbbER ...21
Ri
Ei
![Page 122: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
122
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
For i = 1 to N where:
= return on asset i during a specified time period
= expected return for asset i
= reaction in asset i’s returns to movements in a common factor
ikikiiiitt bbbER ...21
Ri
Ei
bik
![Page 123: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
123
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
For i = 1 to N where:
= return on asset i during a specified time period
= expected return for asset i
= reaction in asset i’s returns to movements in a common factor
= a common factor with a zero mean that influences the returns on all assets
ikikiiiitt bbbER ...21
Ri
Ei
bik
k
![Page 124: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
124
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) For i = 1 to N where: = return on asset i during a specified time period= expected return for asset i= reaction in asset i’s returns to movements in a common
factor= a common factor with a zero mean that influences the
returns on all assets= a unique effect on asset i’s return that, by assumption, is
completely diversifiable in large portfolios and has a mean of zero
ikikiiiitt bbbER ...21
Ri
Ei
bik
ki
![Page 125: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
125
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) For i = 1 to N where: = return on asset i during a specified time period= expected return for asset i= reaction in asset i’s returns to movements in a common
factor= a common factor with a zero mean that influences the
returns on all assets= a unique effect on asset i’s return that, by assumption, is
completely diversifiable in large portfolios and has a mean of zero
= number of assets
ikikiiiitt bbbER ...21
Ri
Ei
bik
ki
N
![Page 126: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
126
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) Multiple factors expected to have an
impact on all assets:k
![Page 127: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
127
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Multiple factors expected to have an impact
on all assets:• Inflation
![Page 128: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
128
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Multiple factors expected to have an impact
on all assets:• Inflation• Growth in GNP
![Page 129: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
129
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Multiple factors expected to have an impact
on all assets:• Inflation• Growth in GNP• Major political upheavals
![Page 130: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
130
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Multiple factors expected to have an impact
on all assets:• Inflation• Growth in GNP• Major political upheavals• Changes in interest rates
![Page 131: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
131
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Multiple factors expected to have an impact
on all assets:• Inflation• Growth in GNP• Major political upheavals• Changes in interest rates• And many more….
![Page 132: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
132
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Multiple factors expected to have an impact on all
assets:• Inflation• Growth in GNP• Major political upheavals• Changes in interest rates• And many more….
Contrast with CAPM insistence that only beta is relevant
![Page 133: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
133
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)Bik determine how each asset reacts to this common
factorEach asset may be affected by growth in GNP, but
the effects will differIn application of the theory, the factors are not
identified
Similar to the CAPM, the unique effects are independent and will be diversified away in a large portfolio
![Page 134: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
134
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) APT assumes that, in equilibrium, the
return on a zero-investment, zero-systematic-risk portfolio is zero when the unique effects are diversified away
The expected return on any asset i (Ei) can be expressed as:
![Page 135: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
135
Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
where:
= the expected return on an asset with zero systematic risk where
ikkiii bbbE ...22110
0
01 EEi
00 E1 = the risk premium related to each of the common
factors - for example the risk premium related to interest rate risk
bi = the pricing relationship between the risk premium and asset i - that is how responsive asset i is to this common factor K
![Page 136: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
136
The Model of APT k
Ri= E( Ri )+ ∑ δj βij+ εi
j=1 where, R i : The single period expected rate on
security i , i =1,2….,n δj : The zero mean j factor common to the
all assets under consideration βij : The sensitivity of security i’s returns to
the fluctuations in the j th common factor portfolio
εi : A random of i th security that constructed to have a mean of zero.
![Page 137: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
137
Arbitrage Pricing Theory-briefly
•Arbitrage - arises if an investor can construct a zero investment portfolio with a sure profit
Since no investment is required, an investor can create large positions to secure large levels of profit
In efficient markets, profitable arbitrage opportunities will quickly disappear
![Page 138: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
138
Arbitrage Portfolio
Mean Stan. Correlation
Return Dev. Of Returns
Portfolio
A,B,C 25.83 6.40 0.94
D 22.25 8.58
![Page 139: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
139
Arbitrage Action and Returns
E. Ret.E. Ret.
St.Dev.St.Dev.
* * PP* * DD
Short 3 shares of D and buy 1 of A, B & C to form Short 3 shares of D and buy 1 of A, B & C to form PP
You earn a higher rate on the investment than You earn a higher rate on the investment than you pay on the short saleyou pay on the short sale
![Page 140: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
140
The APT Model General representation of the APT model:
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4( )
where actual return on Security
( ) expected return on Security
sensitivity of Security to factor
unanticipated change in factor
A A A A A A
A
A
iA
i
R E R b F b F b F b F
R A
E R A
b A i
F i
![Page 141: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
141
Comparison of the CAPM and the APT
The CAPM’s market portfolio is difficult to construct:• Theoretically all assets should be included (real estate,
gold, etc.)
• Practically, a proxy like the S&P 500 index is used
APT requires specification of the relevant macroeconomic factors
![Page 142: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
142
Comparison of the CAPM and the APT (cont’d)
The CAPM and APT complement each other rather than compete• Both models predict that positive returns will
result from factor sensitivities that move with the market and vice versa
![Page 143: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
143
Example of Two Stocks and a Two-Factor Model= changes in the rate of inflation. The risk premium
related to this factor is 1 percent for every 1 percent change in the rate
1)01.( 1
= percent growth in real GNP. The average risk premium related to this factor is 2 percent for every 1 percent change in the rate
= the rate of return on a zero-systematic-risk asset (zero beta: boj=0) is 3 percent
2)02.( 2
)03.( 3 3
![Page 144: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
144
Example of Two Stocks and a Two-Factor Model= the response of asset X to changes in the rate of
inflation is 0.501xb
)50.( 1 xb
= the response of asset Y to changes in the rate of inflation is 2.00 )50.( 1 yb1yb
= the response of asset X to changes in the growth rate of real GNP is 1.50
= the response of asset Y to changes in the growth rate of real GNP is 1.75
2xb
2yb)50.1( 2 xb
)75.1( 2 yb
![Page 145: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
145
Example of Two Stocks and a Two-Factor Model
= .03 + (.01)bi1 + (.02)bi2
Ex = .03 + (.01)(0.50) + (.02)(1.50)
= .065 = 6.5%
Ey = .03 + (.01)(2.00) + (.02)(1.75)
= .085 = 8.5%
22110 iii bbE
![Page 146: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
146
Roll-Ross StudyThe methodology used in the study is as follows:1. Estimate the expected returns and the factor
coefficients from time-series data on individual asset returns
2. Use these estimates to test the basic cross-sectional pricing conclusion implied by the APT
The authors concluded that the evidence generally supported the APT, but acknowledged that their tests were not conclusive
![Page 147: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
147
Extensions of the Roll-Ross Study
Cho, Elton, and Gruber examined the number of factors in the return-generating process that were priced
Dhrymes, Friend, and Gultekin (DFG) reexamined techniques and their limitations and found the number of factors varies with the size of the portfolio
![Page 148: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
148
The APT and Anomalies
Small-firm effectReinganum - results inconsistent with the APT
Chen - supported the APT model over CAPM January anomaly
Gultekin - APT not better than CAPM
Burmeister and McElroy - effect not captured by model, but still rejected CAPM in favor of APT
![Page 149: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
149
Shanken’s Challenge to Testability of the APT
If returns are not explained by a model, it is not considered rejection of a model; however if the factors do explain returns, it is considered support
APT has no advantage because the factors need not be observable, so equivalent sets may conform to different factor structures
Empirical formulation of the APT may yield different implications regarding the expected returns for a given set of securities
Thus, the theory cannot explain differential returns between securities because it cannot identify the relevant factor structure that explains the differential returns
![Page 150: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
150
APT and CAPM Compared
APT applies to well diversified portfolios and not necessarily to individual stocks
With APT it is possible for some individual stocks to be mispriced - not lie on the SML
APT is more general in that it gets to an expected return and beta relationship without the assumption of the market portfolio
APT can be extended to multifactor models
![Page 151: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
151
Example-market risk
Suppose the risk free rate is 5%, the average investor has a risk-aversion coefficient of A* is 2, and the st. dev. Of the market portfolio is 20%.
A) Calculate the market risk premium. B) Find the expected rate of return on the market. C) Calculate the market risk premium as the risk-
aversion coefficient of A* increases from 2 to 3. D) Find the expected rate of return on the market
referring to part c.
![Page 152: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
152
Answer-market risk
A) E(rm-rf)=A*σ2m
Market Risk Premium =2(0.20)2=0.08 B) E(rm) = rf +Eq. Risk prem
= 0.05+0.08=0.13 or 13%
C) Market Risk Premium =3(0.20)2=0.12 D) E(rm) = rf +Eq. Risk prem
= 0.05+0.12=0.17 or 17%
![Page 153: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
153
Example-risk premiumExample-risk premium
Suppose an av. Excess return over Treasury bill of 8% with a st. dev. Of 20%.
A) Calculate coefficient of risk-aversion of the av. investor.
B) Calculate the market risk premium as the risk-aversion coefficient is 3.5
![Page 154: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
154
Answer-risk premium A) A*= E(rm-rf)/ σ2
m =0.085/0.202=2.1
B) E(rm)-rf =A*σ2m =3.5(0.20)2=0.14 or 14%
![Page 155: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
155
Example-Portfolio beta and risk premium
Consider the following portfolio:
A) Calculate the risk premium on each portfolio
B) Calculate the total portfolio if Market risk premium is 7.5%.
Asset BetaRisk
prem.Portfolio Weight
X 1.2 9% 0.5
Y 0.8 6 0.3
Z 0.0 0 0.2
Port. 0.84 1.0
![Page 156: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/156.jpg)
156
Answer-Portfolio beta and risk premium
A) (9%) (0.5)=4.5 (6%) (0.3)=1.8 =6.3% B) 0.84(7.5)=6.3%
![Page 157: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/157.jpg)
157
Example-risk premium Suppose the risk premium of the market portfolio
is 8%, with a st. dev. Of 22%.
A) Calculate portfolio’s beta. B) Calculate the risk premium of the portfolio
referring to a portfolio invested 25% in x motor company with beta 0f 1.15 and 75% in y motor company with a beta of 1.25.
![Page 158: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/158.jpg)
158
Answer-risk premium
A) βy= 1.25, βx= 1.15
βp=wy βy+ wx βx
=0.75(1.25)+0.25(1.15)=1.225
B) E(rp)-rf=βp[E(rm)-rf]
=1.225(8%)=9.8%
![Page 159: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/159.jpg)
159
Example-SML
Suppose the return on the market is expected to be 14%, a stock has a beta of 1.2, and the T-bill rate is 6%.
A) Calculate the expected return of the SML B) If the return is 17%, calculate alpha of the
stock
![Page 160: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/160.jpg)
160
Answer-SML A) E(rp)=rf+β[E(rm)-rf]
=6+1.2(14-6)=15.6%E(r)E(r)
17%17% SMLSML
ßß1.01.0
15.6%15.6%
14%14%
6%6%
1.21.2
MM
StockStock
α=α= 17-15.6=1.417-15.6=1.4
![Page 161: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/161.jpg)
161
Example-SML Stock xyz has an expected return of 12% and risk of
beta is 1.5. Stock ABC is expected to return 13% with a beta of 1.5. The market expected return is 11% and rf=5%.
A) Based on CAPM, which stock is a better buy? B) What is the alpha of each stock? C) Plot the relevant SML of the two stocks D) rf is 8% ER on the market portfolio is 16%, and
estimated beta is 1.3, what is the required ROR on the project?
E) If the IRR of the project is 19%, what is the project alpha?
![Page 162: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/162.jpg)
162
Answer-SML A and B) α=E(r)-{rf+β[E(rm)-rf]}
αXYZ= 12-{5+1.0[11-5]}=1
• UNDERVALUED
αABC= 13-{5+1.5[11-5]}= -1
• OVERVALUED
![Page 163: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/163.jpg)
163
Answer-SML-CAnswer-SML-C
E(r)E(r)
14%14% SMLSML
ßß1.01.0
13%13%
12%12%
5%5%
1.51.5
xyzxyz
StockStock
α=α= 13-14=-113-14=-1
ααABCABC
=13-12=1=13-12=1
![Page 164: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/164.jpg)
164
Answer-SML
D) E(r)={rf+β[E(rm)-rf]}
= 8+1.3[16-8]=18.4% E) If the IRR of the project is 19%, it is
desirable. However, any project with an IRR by using similar beta is less than 18.4% should be rejected.
![Page 165: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/165.jpg)
165
Example-SML
Consider the following table:
Market Return
Aggressive stock
Defensive stock
5% 2% 3.5%
20 32 14
![Page 166: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/166.jpg)
166
Example-SML cont..
A) What are the betas of the two stock? B) What is the E(ROR) on each stock if Market
return is equally likely to be 5% or 20%? C) If T-bill rate is 8% and Market return is equally
likely to be 5% or 20%, draw SML for the economy?
D) Plot the two securities on the SML graph and show the alphas
![Page 167: Ch04 Capm and Apt](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061113/545dcd6fb0af9fdd168b482f/html5/thumbnails/167.jpg)
167
Answer-SML
A) βA=2-32/5-20=2 βB=3.5-14/5-20=0.7
B) E(rA)={rf+β[E(rm)-rf]}
=0.5(2%+32%)=17% =0.5(3.5%+14%)=8.75%