Ch 9 evolution - University of Minnesota Duluthalittle/1001/documents/Ch9evolution_000.pdf · 2 Fig...
Transcript of Ch 9 evolution - University of Minnesota Duluthalittle/1001/documents/Ch9evolution_000.pdf · 2 Fig...
1
Evolution:Change in population characteristics over generations
OUTLINEEvolution and common descent
History of evolutionary thought
Evidence for evolution
Evaluating models
Evolutionary novelty
Goals: Be able to…Explain the central tenets of evolution.
Explain how natural selection leads to evolution.
Describe how Darwin came up with the theory of common descent.
Central tenets of evolution
1. Populations have changed over time into the different species we see today
2. Theory of Common Descent: These populations changed from a common ancestor
2
Fig 9.2
Natural selection is a mechanism of evolution
Microevolution: Change over short periods
Mixed lice Resistant lice survive
Resistant lice
Apply permethrin
Fig 9.1
Fig 9.2
Natural selection
Speciation: formation of new species
OUTLINEEvolution and common descent
History of evolutionary thought
Evidence for evolution
Evaluating models
Evolutionary novelty
Historical ideas about evolution:Separate (“special”) creation:
Species are fixed on a scale of complexity with humans on top.
The world is perfect.
-- Plato, Aristotle …
Fig 9.7
3
Theory of Common Descent
1. Views of Lamarck (evolutionist)
2. Views of Lyell (geologist)
3. Fossil evidence
4. Travels to Galapagos
Lamarck:Organisms change over generations
Due to the Biblical flood?
Result: Earth is much > 10,000 yo
Or, due to gradual changes over very long time periods?
Lyell
Fossils of dinosaurs: some species don’t make it
Result: The world is not perfect
5 year expedition around the world
Fig 9.4
Galapagos giant tortoises
Different kinds of giant tortoises on different islandsResult: Giant tortoises must be related, but diverged over time
4
Fig 9.2
Giant
Darwin published “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection” in 1859
Alfred Russell Wallace Darwin
True/False: Fossils of species that don’t exist today, in combination with a lack of fossils of modern species, support the idea that organisms have NOT evolved over time.
1. True2. False
OUTLINEEvolution and common descent
History of evolutionary thought
Evidence for evolution
Evaluating models
Evolutionary novelty
Goals: Be able to…Describe how classification, homology, biogeography, and fossils all provide evidence for the theory of common descent.
Differentiate between analogy and homology.
Apply your knowledge of radiometric dating to problems.
Discuss evidence refuting various alternative hypotheses of evolution.
Describe 3 ways in which evolutionary noveltycan be generated by small changes.
Do you agree or disagree with the statement: “Human beings, as we know them, developed from earlier species of animals.”1. Agree2. Disagree3. Don’t know
5
“Human beings, as we know them, developed from earlier species of animals.”
Agree Disagree
Hypothesis 1: Static model
Fig 9.7
Fig 9.7
Hypothesis 2: Transformation
Fig 9.7
Hypothesis 3: Separate types
Independent origins
6
Hypothesis 4: Common descent
Fig 9.7
Common origin of life
Scientists investigate evolution, because
1. It is the only acceptable scientific explanation for the observed patterns of change in organisms over time.
2. They are not spiritual or religious people.3. They want to disprove the existence of (a)
Creator(s).4. All of the above.
Evidence for Evolution1. Biological classification
2. Homology of features
3. Biogeography
4. Fossils!
Fig 9.9
Classification suggests relatedness
Why are we able to put organisms into groups?
Fig 9.11
Ancestry represented using trees
More closely related = more recent common ancestor
Evidence for Evolution1. Biological classification
2. Homology of features
3. Biogeography
4. Fossils!
7
Homology: Similarity of features due to common ancestry
Fig 9.12Homology
Vestigial structures: evolutionary baggage
Fig 9.13
Vestigial structures Similar genetic sequences
Fig 9.17
True/False: A fish fin and a whale flipper are homologous structures.
1. True2. False
Evidence for Evolution1. Biological classification
2. Homology of features
3. Biogeography: Geographic distributions
4. Fossils!
8
Marsupials: Young develop in pouches
PlacentalsMarsupials
Porpoise: mammal
Icthyosaur: reptile
Analogy: similarity due to common function
Convergent evolution: similar features arise due to common environmental pressure, not ancestry.
Evidence for Evolution1. Biological classification
2. Homology of features
3. Biogeography
4. Fossils!
Archaeopteryx: transitional bird-lizard
Transitions in the fossil record
Transitions in the fossil record
Fig 9.28
9
Fig 9.21
Fossilization: minerals replace organic matter
How do we know how old fossils are?
Radioactive elements “decay” at a predictable rate.
Decay causes parent elements to turn into daughter elements
Uranium Lead
Half-life is the time it takes for ½ of the parts to decay
Age of the Earth
200 years ago 150 years ago 100 years ago 50 years ago
What is the half-life of this element?
Age of the Earth Age of the Earth
Fig 9.24
1 half-life = 1 million yr
19% left = 2.5 half-lives
100% left
50% left
25% left
12.5% left
Zircon4.5 billion yrsUranium/Lead
Micas47 billion yrsRubidium/Strontium
Volcanic rock1.3 billion yrsPotassium/
Argon
Shells, Limestone, organics
5,730 yrsCarbon/Nitrogen
Materials datedHalf-livesMethod
Age of the Earth If an element has a half-life of 20 million years, and there is 25% of it remaining in a rock, how old is the rock?1. 5 million years2. 10 million years3. 20 million years4. 40 million years
10
Group Problem: M&Mite decay
M&Mite spontaneously decays into the daughter product “beanus” over time
1. Using your samples (baggies), graph # of M&Mite molecules vs. Number of half-lives.
2. If your oldest sample is 1000 years old, what is the half-life of M&Mite?
OUTLINEEvolution and common descent
History of evolutionary thought
Evidence for evolution
Evaluating models
Evolutionary novelty
Hypothesis 1: Static model
Fig 9.7
What evidence refutes this theory?
Fig 9.7
Hypothesis 2: Transformation
What evidence refutes this theory?
Fig 9.7
Hypothesis 3: Separate types
Independent origins
What evidence refutes this theory?
Hypothesis 4: Common descent
Fig 9.7
Common origin of life
11
We can reject the static hypothesis, because1. We usually do not find fossils record that are
exactly the same as living organisms.2. Fossil evidence indicates that many organisms
have gone extinct.3. Many diverse features share a basic structure
(bat wing & whale flipper bones).4. We can find fossils transitional between
different organisms that are currently alive.5. All of the above.
Example short answer:
List 2 pieces of evidence that refute the static hypothesis. For each piece, state which aspect of the status hypothesis is refuted.
OUTLINEEvolution and common descent
History of evolutionary thought
Evidence for evolution
Evaluating models
Evolutionary novelty
Generation of evolutionary novelty• Exaptation
• Developmental mutations
• Intermediate forms
Exaptations: Features originally performed a different function than they currently do.
Mutations in developmental genes…
Amphistoma larva
Axolotl adult
Have widespread effects
Pigment cells
EyecupPinhole eye
Primitive lens
Complex camera eye
Intermediate forms
12
True/False: Both bird feathers and the human eye are irreducibly complex
1. True2. False
Example short answer:
In 1-2 sentences, describe how feathers on birds may have evolved.
Group Problem: Birds on Islands
AB
C
A = Red feathers, blue beaks
B = Red feathers, black beaks
C = Yellow feathers, blue beaks
1. Draw 2 possible phylogenetic trees for these 3 species.
2. What specific evidence would help you choose between these 2 hypotheses?
Goals: Be able to…Describe features that 1) we share with other primates, 2) differentiate apes from other primates, and 3) differentiate us from apes.
Describe the environment in which primate features evolved.
Explain why Lucy was such an important find.
Discuss hypotheses about the origins of bipedalism and big brains.
Tell me when modern humans arose, and about their Homo ancestors.
Primates• Grasping hands
• Forward-facing eyes
• Large brains
Why? Adaptation for forest life
Prosimians: Lemurs and tarsiers
Earliest divergingMonkeys and apes
Opposable thumb!
13
Apes• No tail
• Long forelimbs
• Larger brainsFig 9.11
GorillasOrangutans
Bonobos
Chimpanzees
What human features were probably adaptations for forest life?
1. Fingernails2. Forward-facing eyes3. Opposable thumbs4. Lack of hair5. 2 and 36. All of the above
Example short answer:
List 2 human features that were originally adaptations for forest life.
-OR-
Give 2 ways in which apes are distinct from other primates.
What does it mean to be human?1) Large brain 2) Bipedalism 3) Short jaw
4) Reduced sexual differences 5) Monogamy
14
Fig 9.22
Comparing humans vs. chimps
Hominins: Most closely related to us.
Diverged from chimpanzee line: 5-7 mya?
Fig 9.25
What features separate humans from other apes?
1. Forward-facing eyes2. Opposable thumbs3. Long arms4. Largest brain
Example short answer:
What are the most critical 2 ways in which human anatomy differs from other apes?
Enlarging brain
Fig 9.27
Looking for 2 major features:
• Bipedal posture
• Enlarged brain
How did they evolve?Early ideas:
Brain sizeBipedal posture
+
+
Dry savanna provides more complexity?
15
Along came Lucy…
~ 3.5 mya: Australopithecus afarensisFig 9.23 Australopithecus afarensis
Homo sapiens
Fig 9.23
Problem: Bipedal with small brain
Early theories:
Brain sizeBipedal posture
+
+
Bipedal posture is the key!!!
Why bipedalism?
Why might bipedalism be favorable in a savanna (as opposed to forest) environment?
Environmental change dry savannas
Why bipedalism?
Not using hands for tree climbing?
Easier to see far away?
Easier to carry things?
Prevent overheating?
Environmental change dry savannasBipedalism paved the way for large brain?
Babies born smaller due to pelvis…
Longer care of infants more culture?
Hands free to create tools…?
16
True/False: Looking at human evolution, we can see that bipedalism developed before large brain size.1. True2. False
Example short answer:
What did the fossil Lucy demonstrate about the order of evolution of bipedalism and big brains?
Fig 9.25
Genus: Homo
Homo habilis: “handy-man”
First tool-maker
Brain size: 47% of ours
Homo erectus
Specialized tools
Brain size: 71%
Homo erectus colonized Asia and Europe
Neanderthals: 500,000 – 30,000 years ago?
Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Brain size: 12% larger
17
Homo sapiens sapiens: 100,000 years ago. Origins of agriculture begin 9500 BC
Cultural evolution…
Homo floresiensus: The HobbitAlive 13,000 years ago
What do you think about the statement:
“God created man pretty much in his present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.”
Example short answer:
What scientific support is there that humans share a common ancestor with chimpanzees?