Ch 8 Slide 1 Some hints about analysis First try to establish morphemes. If there is allomorphy,...
-
Upload
ralph-godwin-hicks -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Ch 8 Slide 1 Some hints about analysis First try to establish morphemes. If there is allomorphy,...
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 1
•Some hints about analysis
•First try to establish morphemes. If there is allomorphy, list all of the alternants (remember some morphemes don’t show up on the surface due to deletion). Then try to figure out what phonological thing is causing the alternation (phonological environments, etc). List the alternants and what the environment that they occur in. Then account for this alternation with phonological rules. Be sure to consider if there are multiple rules, do they interact? Do they need to be ordered? Need to answer why not if they don’t – don’t just say they don’t need to be ordered but prove that as much as if they do need to be ordered!
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 2
Rule application and derivation and order:
Feeding = Two rules are said to be in a feeding order if the earlier rule creates environments in which the later rule can apply.
Bleeding = If two rules, A and B, are in a bleeding order, the application of rule A causes a decrease in the number of forms to which rule B can apply. An example: suppose rule A changes some consonants from voiceless to voiced in some environments and rule B only applies to voiceless consonants. The application of rule A before rule B would mean that fewer forms are available for rule B to apply to.
Counter Feeding = The ordering of two phonological rules so that Rule A, which could provide contexts for the operation of Rule B, is prevented from doing so by being ordered after Rule B
Counter Bleeding = The ordering of two phonological rules so that Rule A, which could remove contexts in which Rule B operates, is prevented from doing so by being ordered after Rule B.
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 3
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 4
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic AnalysisMorphophonemic Analysis
1. Examine data and find morphemes
2. Find all alternating morphemes and id allomorphs
3. Within each allomorph, locate segments that alternate
4. Consider logical possibilities, set up underlying forms, so that each allomorph can be derived from underlying form via phonological rules.
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 5
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic AnalysisMorphophonemic Analysis
1. Keep segments that do not alternate as underlying
2. Follow hypothesis about alternating segments – did it start out as A or B?
3. Be sure underlying is uniform for each of the paradigm
Don’t analyze in a direction opposite to that of a neutralization – like final obstruent devoicing, make sure that if you have a contrast in forms in certain environments but not others (end of word), then this environment is probably a neutralizing one and you should assume the underlying forms contrast
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 6
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic AnalysisIsolation form is a good bet of the underlying morpheme for the stem – but not
always! See Lardil info below
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 7
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Should be [–anterior]
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 8
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 9
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
What are the morphemes? What are the choices?
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 10
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 11
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
But why those vowels? Deletion easier to explain than epenthesis!
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 12
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
What’s the problem here? Show u~a alternation
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 13
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
2nd is better because it doesn’t change wankan to wankun
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 14
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Based on these data, we can say that final vowel lowering applied to both front and back high vowels
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 15
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
This alternation requires yet another rule:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 16
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic AnalysisThese rules get us to this point:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 17
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Another problem in more data: Where’d that k come from?
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 18
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
More problems:
Notice that we can explain all but uninflected – there is a zero final vowel that alternates with other forms of paradigm!
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 19
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Another rule is needed – what is it? Again, deletion better than epenthesis, but need to make sure don’t delete final vowel in forms like:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 20
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Leads us to this: papi doesn’t undergo Apocope because only 2 syllables = rule doesn’t apply
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 21
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Now what happened to 2nd consonant and final vowel of stem???
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 22
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Now what happened to 2nd consonant and final vowel of stem??? We’d expect:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 23
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic AnalysisALSO applies to underlying clusters without final vowel:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 24
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
We need following rule to explain:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 25
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Now what happened to this last consonant and vowel? Not a cluster, but must be deletion because couldn’t explain epenthesis of all these possibilities
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 26
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic AnalysisRule X needs to account for these data and data below as well
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 27
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
But not these:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 28
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
The ones that stay are [-distributed] so we write the rule as:
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 29
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 30
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 31
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Why must they be ordered?
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 32
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
Ch 8Ch 8Slide 33
Ch 8 – Morphophonemic Analysis
feeds
feeds
Counterfed by
Bleeds, counterfed by