CFA INSTITUTE THE STATE OF FINTECH IN 2017 Materials/Fintech, April 20… · use experiences in...
Transcript of CFA INSTITUTE THE STATE OF FINTECH IN 2017 Materials/Fintech, April 20… · use experiences in...
CFA INSTITUTE
THE STATE OF FINTECH IN 2017
Sviatoslav Rosov, PhD, CFA
FINTECH – WHAT IS IT?
• Introduction of software into bricks-and-mortar business models. Can
use experiences in other industry to predict future?
• Software typically enables:
• Accelerated industry development cycles Increased
responsiveness to consumers.
• Greater efficiency in serving consumers Fewer employees?
• Free services New business models?
2
FINTECH – WHAT IS IT?
• Three conceptual pillars:
• Decentralisation
• Disintermediation
• Automation
• Three technological pillars:
• Marketplace Lending
• Robo-advisors
• Blockchain
3
WHY DECENTRALISATION?
• Decentralisation allows removal of single points of failure:
• No need for centralised record keeping (e.g. depositories)
• No need for centralised decision making (e.g. bank lending)
• More resilient to security attacks?
• Fintech that decentralises:
• Blockchain - can decentralise any activity.
• P2P lending – decentralises capital marketplace?
4
WHY DISINTERMEDIATION?
• No need for intermediaries to match forces of supply and demand.
• Removes the cost of the intermediary ecosystem lower costs for
consumers or higher profits for producers?
• Fintech that disintermediates:
• P2P lending – brings savers and borrowers into direct contact.
• Blockchain – removes the need for CCPs, Brokers, Custodians,
Clearing Houses and CSDs.
• Robo-advisors – no need for human financial advisors?
5
WHY AUTOMATION?
• Can remove the need for human labour, or free up human capital for
more productive tasks.
• More efficient at serving large numbers of consumers.
• Fintech that automates:
• Robo-advice – more efficient way of providing simple diversified
portfolios.
• Smart contracts – execute automatically once pre-specified
conditions are met.
6
STATE OF FINTECH
Let’s get an update on the three fintech areas:
1. P2P lending
2. Blockchain
3. Robo-advisors
7
STATE OF PEER TO PEER LENDING
• Increasingly looking like ordinary banking/ asset management.
• New entrants typically not interested in selling directly to investors
(exceptions – 1G firms like Lending Club and Prosper Marketplace).
• Many source institutional funding to make loans:
• P2Ps apply for bank loans arguing they are serving a near-prime
customer base the banks don’t serve.
• Some P2Ps are applying for banking licences (e.g. Zopa). Why?
8
P2P – WHAT NEXT?
• Not enough retail lenders to sustain the growth rates demanded by VC
investment. Need ‘deposits’ to fund loan books.
• Adopting banking/ asset management techniques to survive/ grow:
• Bundled products (look like collective investment schemes!)
• Provision funds (look like deposit insurance)
• Redemption (look like deposits)
• Graham Wellesley, founder of Wellesley & Co. says “P2P is a little bit of a
red herring”, the business is more like an “…old-fashioned building
society”.
9
P2P – WHAT NEXT?
• Let’s look at one example – Ratesetter, one of the larger UK P2Ps. Offers investment ‘products’ that look like CIS.
• Regulators: “If they look like banks why aren’t they regulated like banks?”
10
P2P – WHAT NEXT?
After early enthusiasm driven by UK Treasury, the FCA has been casting a
more critical eye at the industry:
• Innovative Finance ISA (tax-free investment vehicle) has been delayed
for a second year.
• FCA consulting on tougher rules after finding “inadequate disclosures
about risk and loan performance”.
• Firms “testing the boundaries” of what crowdfunding regulations allow.
11
P2P – SIDE NOTE
In many ways, P2P in China is unrelated to rest of world:
• Scale - up to 75% of global P2P market (USD 100 billion). 20% of
consumer credit.
• Late-starter advantage with consumers moving from cash & no
investment opportunities to online payments & P2P + savings culture.
• P2P are funded by individual investors, not institutional.
• To-date has been almost unregulated. Recent significant scams have led
to a looming regulatory wipe-out for majority of P2P firms.
12
STATE OF BLOCKCHAIN
• 2 years ago, Bitcoin’s design-issues caused industry to pivot towards
alternatives based on underlying blockchain tech:
• “Bitcoin bad, blockchain good”
• The industry’s version of Bitcoin is the permissioned blockchain.
• But… as commercialisation has stalled, another change in mood can
be detected:
• “Blockchain is boring, let’s look at Bitcoin again!”
13
PERMISSIONED BLOCKCHAINS
• Same idea as Bitcoin, but only known users are allowed to participate in
network.
• Advantages:
• Faster
• Scalable
• Conforms to regulation
• Disadvantages:
• Similar to difference between intranet (better for corporates) and
intranet (bigger impact).
14
BLOCKCHAIN – WHAT’S NEXT?
• The Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) – leading attempt at significant
commercialisation.
• ASX blockchain system is ready, will make final commercial decision by
end of FY 2017.
• The system would have (minimum) three nodes:
• ASX
• Reserve Bank of Australia, and
• Australian Securities and Investments Commission (i.e. regtech):
15
BLOCKCHAIN – WHAT’S NEXT?
• Blockchain benefits proportional to network effects – the more users the
higher the benefits.
• Past attempts to cooperate on sharing databases failed.
• What will overcome cultural and competitive differences this time?
• Regulatory environment:
• Currently, regulators agree best approach is ‘do no harm’. How long
will that last?
16
BLOCKCHAIN – WHAT’S NEXT?
• SWIFT is working on its Global Payments Innovation project.
• Not using blockchain.
• SWIFT says blockchain is not ready and not necessary to significantly
improve cross-border transactions.
• One of the biggest original Blockchain ‘consortiums’ R3 now is
‘Blockchain-inspired’ consortium (i.e. does not use a blockchain).
17
STATE OF ROBO ADVISORS
• The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) estimates 2/3 of retail financial
products are purchased without advice.
• Advice gap created by a ban on commission payments by producers to
advisors selling funds (2012).
• Retail clients don’t want to pay EUR 100s per hour for financial advice,
advisors don’t want low-asset clients either!
• To solve advice gap, FCA is pinning its hope on robo-advisors. Will it
work?
18
ROBO ADVISORS – WHAT’S NEXT?
• CFA Institute - 2016 Fintech Survey.
19
STATE OF ROBO ADVISORS
• For independent robos, fees typically do not cover customer acquisition
costs.
• To solve this problem:
• Robos are aiming to attract older/wealthier clients that are even more
costly to acquire, but proportionally more profitable.
• Others are working with/ selling out to incumbent managers with large
client lists.
20
STATE OF ROBO ADVISORS
21
• Wealthfront AUM $3 billion vs. Blackrock AUM $5 trillion.
Chart source: US Census Bureau, TabbFORUM (TABB Group)
ROBO ADVISORS – WHAT’S NEXT?
• ETF industry sees robos as promising distribution channel. Why?
• Robo-advisors sell finite number of products (typically ETF portfolios),
not ‘investment advice’ in the broader sense.
• The underlying demand is for the latter.
• Future of robo advice – hybrid human/robo ‘lifestyle planning’?
• Betterment – the largest US robo has recently introduced the option of
‘premium’ service – a human financial advisor.
22
ROBO ADVISORS – WHAT’S NEXT?
• Inevitably, basic financial advice (i.e. ETF diversification) will be given
away for free.
• What can you charge for? Lifestyle financial planning:
• Identifying goals and what is necessary to achieve them.
• Identifying psychological biases and how to overcome them.
• Considering personal circumstances.
• ’What if’ scenario planning.
• Asset managers are actually ‘life coaches’?
23
HAS FINTECH DELIVERED?
Most interesting fintech likely to be:
1. Payments technology
• Apple Pay/ Android Pay
• Open banking API regulations
2. Blockchain
• Will anyone notice if markets/ settlement move to blockchain?
3. Robo-advice
• How will it change incumbent business models?
24
CHALLENGES FOR FINTECH
• Fintech is usually pitched as addressing ‘millennial’ & ‘tech-savvy’
market.
• But millennials have relatively little wealth…
• Why bother? To influence early adopters…
• Start-up business model – growth now, profit later – risky.
• VC funds ‘disruption’, not ‘improvement’.
• Most fintechs will ‘exit’ via sale to incumbents?
25
CHALLENGES FOR FINTECH
• As a result, we will likely see reinvention/ reform of existing institutions
rather than wholesale displacement:
• More efficient banking.
• Cheaper asset management.
• More efficient payments.
• We may also see increases in financial inclusion?
26
CHALLENGES FOR FINTECH
• Fintech may not be life-changing for developed world.
• The ‘West’ is already ‘overbanked’ and any gains likely to be marginal.
• Developing world may see the biggest impact – low-hanging fruit of
financial inclusion potentially enormous.
• Similar to countries bypassing telephone lines and going straight to
3G/4G mobile networks.
27
ROLE FOR REGULATORS
• CFA Institute advocates in support of new technologies but not at
expense of:
• Market fairness/ market integrity/ investor protections
• Need to ensure new businesses that look like old business model but on
a smartphone do not fall through regulatory cracks.
Need to manage the entry of retail players mega-brands like Amazon/
Alibaba/ Facebook into financial services.
Need to ensure regulations are technologically-agnostic.
28
www.cfainstitute.org