CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the...

29
CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. CLARE. ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017. Prepared for: CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL ÁRAS CONTAE AN CHLÁIR NEW ROAD ENNIS CO. CLARE 3156 May 16 th , 2017 For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Transcript of CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the...

Page 1: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY,

INAGH, CO. CLARE.

ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MONITORING MAY 2017.

Prepared for:

CLARE COUNTY COUNCIL ÁRAS CONTAE AN CHLÁIR

NEW ROAD ENNIS

CO. CLARE

3156 May 16th, 2017

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 2: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

i 3156 / May 15th, 2017

ISSUE/REVISION INDEX

Revision Pages Revised

Remarks # Prep. Rev. Date

PA BS 01 05/05/2017 Issue Draft for Internal Review

PB JR 01 16/05/2017 Issue Draft for Client’s Review

PC JR 01 16/05/2017 Issue Final Document

Prepared by;

Billy Shanahan, M.Sc.

Reviewed by;

John Rea, B.Sc., MIEnv.Sc.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 3: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

ii 3156 / May 15th, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1. INTRODUCTION 1

2. SCOPE OF WORK 2

3. METHODOLOGY 4

3.1. Equipment Calibration 4

3.2. Sound Level Meter Settings 4

3.3. Noise Measurement Methodology 4

3.3.1. Quiet Area Screening 4

3.4. Exclusion of Extraneous Noise Sources 5

4. RESULTS 6

4.1. Location NS1 – Residence Immediately North of N85 and Southeast of Site 6

4.2. Location NS2 – Residence Immediately South of N85 and Southeast of Site 6

4.3. Location NS3 – Residence Immediately North of N85 and West of Site 7

4.4. Location NS4 – Residence on Maghera Road - North of Site 8

4.5. Location NS5 – Residence On Maghera Road - Northeast of Site 9

4.6. Location NS6 – Fitzgerald Residence On Maghera Road - Northeast of Site 9

5. CONCLUSIONS 11

DRAWINGS

• 3156-DWG-02 – Noise Locations

APPENDICES

I Calibration Certs

II Acoustic Parameters

III Broadband & 1/3 Octave Band Measurements

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 4: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

1

3156 / May 15th, 2017

1. INTRODUCTION

JRE Environment (JRE) was retained by Clare County Council to complete an environmental noise assessment at six (6) noise sensitive locations external to the Central Waste Management Facility (CWMF) located at Inagh, Co. Clare. The site is a closed landfill site with an operational bring centre. The first biannual environmental noise monitoring event for 2017 was completed at the six (6) noise sensitive locations on May 3, 2017 as required under Schedule E.4 of the Environmental protection Agency (EPA) site waste licence (Ref. W0109-02).

The site is bounded to the east, north and west by forestry lands with local roads and residences beyond. The site is bounded to the south by the N85 road and mixed agricultural land use and residential properties. Noise measurement locations were based on predetermined locations outlined in Table E.4.1 of the site waste licence, including; NS1 (residence located to the north of the N85 and south of the site), NS2 (residence located to the south of the N85 and south of the site), NS3 (residence located to the north of the N85 and west of the site), NS4 (residence located north of the site on Maghera Road), NS5 (residence located northeast of the site on Maghera Road) and NS6 (Fitzgerald residence located off the Maghera Road, northeast of site). This report deals with the findings of the first biannual noise monitoring readings at the 6 pre-determined monitoring locations in May, 2017. The following should be noted:

• Noise measurement locations are shown on Drawing 3156-DWG-02 and were based on measurement locations included in Table E.4.1 of Waste Licence (W0109-02).

• All noise levels quoted in relation to specific sources are given in terms of LAeq, LA90 and LA10.

• The landfill site is closed and had no on-site operations taking place during the noise survey. There was some limited activity at the civic amenity site where members of the public were delivering and depositing waste and recyclable materials.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 5: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

2 3156 / May 15th, 2017

2. SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of work was to determine the noise levels at the 6 pre-determined noise measurement locations (i.e., NS1 through NS6) included in Table E.4.1 of the site waste licence Ref. 0109-02 during typical normal facility operating times (i.e., between 08.00 and 18.00 hrs). The scope of work included the following:

• Complete a second biannual noise monitoring assessment at 6 noise sensitive locations external to the CWMF site as outlined in Table A.

Table A: Noise Measurement Locations

Location ID Location Description Coordinates

NS1 Residence on north of N85 road and approximately 160m east of CWMF entrance gate. 122413E, 180250N

NS2 Residence on south of N85 road and approximately 90m east of CWMF entrance gate. 122360E, 180199N

NS3 Residence on north of N85 and approximately 600m west of CWMF entrance gate. 121737E, 180423N

NS4 Residence on south side of Maghera road located approximately 450m north of site. 122149E, 181419N

NS5 Residence on south side of Maghera road located approximately 600m northeast of site. 123052E, 181381N

NS6 Residence down laneway on south side of Maghera road located approximately 300m northeast of site.

123047E, 181411N

• All monitoring to include LA90, LA10, LAeq and 1/3 octave frequency analysis to assess general noise emissions and any tonal components from potential on-site noise sources;

• Complete noise monitoring over a 30 minute time period at each monitoring location during typical facility operation times (i.e., between 08.00 and 18.00 hrs). All external noise sources (i.e., noise sources from outside the site operations) to be recorded on the field monitoring sheet;

• Audible site noise source (e.g., green waste chipper) to be noted on the field monitoring sheet; and • Report the first biannual noise monitoring results for 2017 to Clare County Council.

2.1.1. Tonal Component

The NG4 guidance document provides for identification and application of penalty for a prominent tonal noise source. The use of the simplified methodology for the objective identification of tones that is advocated in Annex D of ISO 1996-2:2007(E) is required, whereby a prominent discrete tone can be identified if the time-average sound pressure level in the one-third-octave band of interest exceeds the time-average sound pressure levels of both adjacent one-third-octave bands by a constant level difference. The appropriate level differences vary with frequency and are outlined below. For penalties

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 6: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

3 3156 / May 15th, 2017

to be applied noise levels should be greater than or equal to the following values in both adjacent one-third-octave bands:

• 15dB in low-frequency one-third-octave bands (25Hz to 125Hz) • 8dB in middle-frequency bands (160Hz to 400Hz), and; • 5dB in high-frequency bands (500Hz to 10,000Hz).

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 7: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

4 3156 / May 15th, 2017

3. METHODOLOGY

To ensure the quality of noise measurements recorded at the CWMF, the following methodology was used for the monitoring programme.

3.1. Equipment Calibration

Environmental noise levels were measured using a Larson Davis SoundExpert LxT precision integrating sound level meter that measured the ‘A’-weighted equivalent sound level (LAeq). The calibration certificate for the meter is provided in Appendix I. The statistical sound level meter also calculated the statistical noise measurement parameters including LA90, LA10 as well as LAeq and also contained an integral frequency filter which is used in 1/3 octave frequency analysis. An explanation of relevant acoustical parameters is provided in Appendix II.

3.2. Sound Level Meter Settings

For all noise measurement recordings, the meter settings were as follows:

• Response : Fast

• Range : 40 – 90 dB

• Weighting : dB (A) – broadband measurements

• dB(Z) – one third octave band measurements

3.3. Noise Measurement Methodology

Measurements were conducted based on procedures outlined in ISO 1996: Description and measurement of environmental noise, and, BS4142:1997 Method for rating industrial noise affecting mixed residential and industrial areas. All measurements were taken at a distance of 1.2 to 1.5 m above ground level with the sound level meter hand held. All measurements were also taken at a distance not less than 3.0 m from any reflecting surface, excluding ground surface.

3.3.1. Quiet Area Screening

Before completing the noise monitoring survey, a screening assessment was completed to determine if the site was located in a ‘Quiet Area’ to ascertain the noise criteria and noise monitoring approach that would be applicable in the area of the site. The screening was conducted as per the EPA guidance ‘’Guidance Note for Noise: Licence Applications, Surveys and Assessments in Relation to Scheduled Activities (NG4). The results of the initial screening are provided in Table B below.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 8: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

5 3156 / May 15th, 2017

Table B: Quiet Area Screening Results Yes No

Is the site >3km away from urban areas with a population >1,000 people?

Is the site >10km away from urban areas with a population >5,000 people?

Is the site >15km away from urban areas with a population >10,000 people?

Is the site >3km away from any local industry?

Is the site >10km away from any major industry centre?

Is the site >5km away from any national primary route

Is the site >7.5km away from any motorway or dual carriageway

QUIET AREA?

Based on the results of the screening assessment, the site is not located in a “Quiet Area”

3.4. Exclusion of Extraneous Noise Sources

The CWMF is a closed landfill site but still has an operational bring centre and recycling centre on site. During the monitoring period, no audible noise sources from operational works (i.e., from site work activities) were recorded at any of the monitoring locations. The N85 road is located immediately south of the site and is utilised by members of the public travelling between Ennis and Ennistymon. A large volume of vehicular traffic on the N85 was noted to be the main noise source at all measurement locations located to the southeast and west of the site. Other noted external noise sources that may influence recorded noise levels were; overhead air traffic, intermittent traffic on Maghera Road and bird song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that LA90 noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent background noise levels in the vicinity of the site.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 9: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

6 3156 / May 15th, 2017

4. RESULTS

The results of the broadband and 1/3 octave frequency noise monitoring programme completed in May 2017 are provided in Appendix III and presented in the following sections.

4.1. Location NS1 – Residence Immediately North of N85 and Southeast of Site

No audible noise related to site activities was noted during the noise survey period at NS1. The main audible noise source noted during the measurement period was vehicular traffic on the N85 road immediately to the south of the monitoring location. The measured noise levels during the survey period at location NS1 on May 3, 2017 are presented in Table C, and the 1/3 octave readings are presented in Figure 1.

Table C – Broadband Noise Measurement Levels at Position NS1

Location ID Date Time Noise Level

LAeq Noise Level

LA90 Noise Level

LA10

NS1 May 3, 2017 13:14 – 13:44 56.6 46.1 60.7

Figure 1: 1/3 Octave Frequency Measurements at NS1

4.2. Location NS2 – Residence Immediately South of N85 and Southeast of Site

No audible noise related to site activities was noted during the noise survey period at NS2. The main audible noise sources noted during the measurement period was from vehicular traffic on the N85 road immediately to the north of the monitoring location. The measured noise levels during the survey period at location NS2 on May 3, 2017 are presented in Table D, and the 1/3 octave readings are presented in Figure 2.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 10: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

7 3156 / May 15th, 2017

Table D - Noise Measurement Levels at Position NS2

Location ID Date Time Noise Level

LAeq Noise Level

LA90 Noise Level

LA10

NS2 May 3, 2017 13:45 – 14:15 57.7 45.4 61.4

Figure 2: 1/3 Octave Frequency Measurements at NS2

4.3. Location NS3 – Residence Immediately North of N85 and West of Site

No audible noise related to site activities was noted during the noise survey period at NS3. The main audible noise source noted during the measurement period was from vehicular traffic on the N85 road immediately to the south of the monitoring location. The measured noise levels during the survey period at location NS3 on May 3, 2017 are presented in Table E, and the 1/3 octave readings are presented in Figure 3.

Table E - Noise Measurement Levels at Position NS3

Location ID Date Time Noise Level

LAeq Noise Level

LA90 Noise Level

LA10

NS3 May 3, 2017 14:16 – 14:46 57.0 45.7 61.4

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 11: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

8 3156 / May 15th, 2017

Figure 3: 1/3 Octave Frequency Measurements at NS3

4.4. Location NS4 – Residence on Maghera Road - North of Site

No audible noise related to site activities was noted during the noise survey period at NS4. The main audible noise sources noted during the measurement period was from dogs barking at neighbouring properties. The measured noise levels during the survey period at location NS4 on May 3, 2017 are presented in Table F, and the 1/3 octave readings are presented in Figure 4.

Table F - Noise Measurement Levels at Position NS4

Location ID Date Time Noise Level

LAeq Noise Level

LA90 Noise Level

LA10

NS4 May 3, 2017 11:08 – 11:38 47.0 37.3 48.5

Figure 4: 1/3 Octave Frequency Measurements at NS4

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 12: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

9 3156 / May 15th, 2017

4.5. Location NS5 – Residence on Maghera Road - Northeast of Site

No audible noise related to site activities was noted during the noise survey period at NS5. The main audible noise sources noted during the measurement period was from limited local vehicular traffic on Maghera road, airplane traffic overhead and dogs barking at distant neighbouring properties. The measured noise levels during the survey period at location NS5 on May 3, 2017 are presented in Table G, and the 1/3 octave readings are presented in Figure 5.

Table G - Noise Measurement Levels at Position NS5

Location ID Date Time Noise Level

LAeq Noise Level

LA90 Noise Level

LA10

NS5 May 3, 2017 11:40 – 12:10 45.8 36.8 50.0

Figure 5: 1/3 Octave Frequency Measurements at NS5

4.6. Location NS6 – Fitzgerald Residence on Maghera Road - Northeast of Site

No audible noise related to site activities was noted during the noise survey period at NS6. The main audible noise sources noted during the measurement period was from limited local vehicular traffic on Maghera road and wildlife in the area. The measured noise levels during the survey period at location NS6 on May 3, 2017 are presented in Table H, and the 1/3 octave readings are presented in Figure 6.

. Table H - Noise Measurement Levels at Position NS6

Location ID Date Time Noise Level

LAeq Noise Level

LA90 Noise Level

LA10

NS6 May 3, 2017 12:15 – 12:45 45.0 37.2 48.0

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 13: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

10 3156 / May 15th, 2017

Figure 6: 1/3 Octave Frequency Measurements at NS6

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 14: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

11 3156 / May 15th, 2017

5. CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results of the noise monitoring programme completed at noise sensitive locations around CWMF on May 3rd, 2017 the following was concluded:

• The CWMF is a closed landfill facility with an active bring and recycling facility with limited traffic accessing the site. No noise sources from the site were noted during the noise measurements recorded at any of the monitoring locations. The main environmental noise contribution at the site boundaries and adjacent noise sensitive receptors around the site was generally traffic on the N85 road.

• The LAeq noise levels measured at three (3) noise sensitive locations to the west and southeast of the CWMF (i.e., NS1, NS2 and NS3) were greater than the daytime Licence limit of 55 dB LAeq

for the noise monitoring event. However, extraneous noise sources (i.e., road traffic from the N85 road) was the main contributor to the elevated noise levels recorded and LA90 were considered a more accurate measure of the consistent background noise contribution at each location. The LA90 noise levels measured at the 3 measurement locations were less than 50 dBA indicating no consistent noise impacts from the facility on noise sensitive locations in that area.

• The LAeq noise levels measured at the three (3) noise sensitive locations to the north and northeast of the CWMF (i.e., NS4, NS5 and NS6) were less than the Waste Licence limit of 55 dB LAeq for daytime noise levels indicating no noise impacts from the facility on noise sensitive locations to the north and northeast of the facility.

• The 1/3 octave analysis completed at all monitoring locations during the monitoring assessment indicated no tonal noise component from the site.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:50

Page 15: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

DRAWING

• 3156-DWG-02 – Noise Locations

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 16: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

REAJO
Rectangle
REAJO
Rectangle
REAJO
Callout
Noise Monitoring Location NS2
REAJO
Callout
Noise Monitoring Location NS3
REAJO
Rectangle
REAJO
Callout
Noise Monitoring Location NS4
REAJO
Callout
Noise Monitoring Location NS1
REAJO
Text Box
Noise Locations
REAJO
Text Box
3156-DWG-02
REAJO
Rectangle
REAJO
Rectangle
REAJO
Callout
Noise Monitoring Location NS5
Page 17: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

APPENDIX I

Calibration Certificate

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 18: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 19: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

APPENDIX II

Acoustic Parameters

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 20: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

sretemaraP lacitsuocA

L qeA A eht si - dna level dnuos ydaets suounitnoc tnelaviuqe dethgiew.eulav egareva na stneserper ylevitceffe

L xamA A mumixam eht si - elpmas eht gnirud derusaem level dnuos dethgiew .doirep

L nimA A muminim eht si - level dnuos dethgiew elpmas eht gnirud derusaem .doirep

L 09A A eht si - eht fo %09 rof dedeecxe si hcihw level dnuos dethgiew.esion dnuorgkcab yfitnauq ot desu ;doirep elpmas

L 01A A eht si - eht fo %01 rof dedeecxe si hcihw level dnuos dethgiewyfitnauq ot desu ;doirep elpmas .esion ciffart

A- gnithgiew eht rof tnuocca ot detcerroc era slevel esion hcihw yb ssecorp eht sinon - .gniraeh namuh fo ytiraenil

01x2 ot evitaler era slevel esion detouq llA -5 .aP

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 21: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

APPENDIX III

Broadband & 1/3 Octave Band Measurements

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 22: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

May 2017 Noise Assessment Measurements

Noise Measurement Location NS1

Time Measurement Duration LAeq L10 L90 LAmax L95 L99 Comments13.14 - 13.44 30 minutes 56.6 60.7 46.1 82.8 39 38.2 Vehicular Traffic on N85 was the main source of noise

Noise Measurement Location NS2

Time Measurement Duration LAeq L10 L90 LAmax L95 L99 Comments13.45 - 14.15 30 minutes 57.7 61.4 45.4 81.4 41.2 39.4 Vehicular Traffic on N85 was the main source of noise

Noise Measurement Location NS3

Time Measurement Duration LAeq L10 L90 LAmax L95 L99 Comments14.16-14.46 30 minutes 57 61.4 45.7 73.8 38.7 38 Vehicular Traffic on N85 was the main source of noise

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 23: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

May 2017 Noise Assessment Measurements

Noise Measurement Location NS4

Time Measurement Duration LAeq L10 L90 LAmax L95 L99 Comments11.08-11.38 30 minutes 47 48.5 37.3 70.1 36.8 36.7 Intermittent traffic on Meaghra Road

Noise Measurement Location NS5

Time Measurement Duration LAeq L10 L90 LAmax L95 L99 Comments

11.40-12.10 30 minutes 45.8 50 36.8 54.7 36.5 36.4 Intermittent traffic on Meaghra Road

Noise Measurement Location NS6

Time Measurement Duration LAeq L10 L90 LAmax L95 L99 Comments12.02-12.32 30 minutes 45 48 37.2 70.7 36.9 36.7 Distant Intermittent traffic on Meaghra Road

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 24: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

1/3 Frequency Measurements - NS1

Frequency Level (dB) Measurement Location NS1 - 1/3 Octave Frequency Analysis Results

25 Hz 58.2902131.5 Hz 56.1070740 Hz 55.2636150 Hz 57.07851

62.5 Hz 58.9189280 Hz 55.23349100 Hz 53.23961125 Hz 51.36871160 Hz 49.1373200 Hz 47.44594250 Hz 44.90826315 Hz 41.18862400 Hz 40.35376500 Hz 43.66763625 Hz 45.98684800 Hz 49.012371 KHz 50.23683

1.25 KHz 48.483591.6 KHz 45.91819 Noise Source: Traffic on N85 road 2 KHz 42.36168

2.5 KHz 38.595773.15 KHz 35.87539

4 KHz 34.102875 KHz 30.94561

6.25 KHz 27.583758 KHz 26.8744310 KHz 21.10098

12.5 KHz 17.7131516 KHz 15.95383LAeq 56.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

dB(A

)

Frequency (Hz)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 25: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

1/3 Frequency Measurements - NS2

Frequency Level (dB) Measurement Location NS2 - 1/3 Octave Frequency Analysis Results

25 Hz 55.16785431.5 Hz 53.91742740 Hz 53.50539850 Hz 58.18293

62.5 Hz 58.16074880 Hz 54.291271

100 Hz 51.73748125 Hz 50.714745160 Hz 49.059563200 Hz 47.828194250 Hz 46.424286315 Hz 41.576263400 Hz 41.64109500 Hz 44.43409625 Hz 47.153557800 Hz 50.0074161 KHz 51.216206

1.25 KHz 49.4763911.6 KHz 46.727844 Noise Source: Traffic on N85 road 2 KHz 43.29306 Car passing close to meter

2.5 KHz 39.5946663.15 KHz 40.18478

4 KHz 41.9242635 KHz 40.101067

6.25 KHz 37.939858 KHz 38.706833

10 KHz 24.44089112.5 KHz 19.12612216 KHz 23.975592

LAeq 57.7

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

dB(A

)

Frequency (Hz)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 26: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

1/3 Frequency Measurements - NS3

Frequency Level (dB) Measurement Location NS3 - 1/3 Octave Frequency Analysis Results

25 Hz 56.6813231.5 Hz 54.5751740 Hz 57.0656150 Hz 57.82135

62.5 Hz 57.7804280 Hz 56.54951100 Hz 53.4112125 Hz 51.30725160 Hz 50.1408200 Hz 47.84336250 Hz 45.83311315 Hz 41.48708400 Hz 41.10425500 Hz 43.59512625 Hz 47.33369800 Hz 49.423291 KHz 50.67273

1.25 KHz 49.161091.6 KHz 46.46582 Noise Source: Traffic on N85 road 2 KHz 42.75541

2.5 KHz 38.606583.15 KHz 36.00851

4 KHz 34.367825 KHz 31.13685

6.25 KHz 27.895928 KHz 25.8023710 KHz 21.17091

12.5 KHz 18.1880416 KHz 15.84186Laeq 57

01020304050607080

dB(A

)

Frequency (Hz)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 27: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

1/3 Frequency Measurements - NS4

Frequency Level (dB) Measurement Location NS4 - 1/3 Octave Frequency Analysis Results Meter # 114

25 Hz 57.7431931.5 Hz 54.8211140 Hz 51.4334150 Hz 48.52353

62.5 Hz 46.0319580 Hz 44.48195100 Hz 42.3463125 Hz 39.56744160 Hz 36.24107200 Hz 34.47359250 Hz 37.54276315 Hz 34.56496400 Hz 29.41122500 Hz 29.36636625 Hz 31.31747800 Hz 30.764181 KHz 30.86012

1.25 KHz 30.069361.6 KHz 29.55755 Noise Source: Intermittent traffic on Meaghra Road2 KHz 31.42589 Wildbirds

2.5 KHz 33.806593.15 KHz 35.68621

4 KHz 36.479165 KHz 35.05178

6.25 KHz 33.2000210 KHz 32.61949

12.5 KHz 21.7565716 KHz 20.31727LAeq 47

01020304050607080

dB(A

)

Frequency (Hz)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 28: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

1/3 Frequency Measurements - NS5

Frequency Level (dB) Measurement Location N5 - 1/3 Octave Frequency Analysis Results Meter # 115

25 Hz 56.5357131.5 Hz 53.5850240 Hz 50.862850 Hz 48.17736

62.5 Hz 45.4743680 Hz 43.3164100 Hz 41.12342125 Hz 39.10384160 Hz 37.65144200 Hz 35.21892250 Hz 35.97186315 Hz 33.26055400 Hz 28.84827500 Hz 28.31561625 Hz 27.92855800 Hz 28.133041 KHz 28.11394

1.25 KHz 26.713631.6 KHz 26.74261 Noise Source: Intermittent traffic on Meaghra Road2 KHz 30.7701 Wildbirds

2.5 KHz 32.96921 Plane overhead3.15 KHz 36.35732

4 KHz 37.036815 KHz 36.49356

6.25 KHz 36.78478 KHz 32.5194110 KHz 14.67837

12.5 KHz 12.0437716 KHz 10.96816LAeq 45.8

01020304050607080

dB(A

)

Frequency (Hz)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51

Page 29: CENTRAL WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY, INAGH, CO. …song. Based on the extraneous noise sources at the site it is considered that . A90L. noise levels may be a better reflection of consistent

1/3 Frequency Measurements - NS6

Frequency Level (dB) Measurement Location N6 - 1/3 Octave Frequency Analysis Results Meter # 116

25 Hz 58.7490231.5 Hz 55.8486640 Hz 53.3412750 Hz 50.58437

62.5 Hz 47.4865380 Hz 45.73505100 Hz 43.84709125 Hz 41.53363160 Hz 39.27716200 Hz 36.46157250 Hz 37.89996315 Hz 35.37658400 Hz 29.44089500 Hz 30.09298625 Hz 30.42154800 Hz 30.689251 KHz 31.08345

1.25 KHz 29.82251.6 KHz 29.208572 KHz 30.2011 Noise Source: Distant intermittent traffic on Meaghra Road

2.5 KHz 32.62159 Wildbirds 3.15 KHz 34.69652

4 KHz 34.19435 KHz 29.45774

6.25 KHz 28.701848 KHz 28.2604110 KHz 17.11907

12.5 KHz 15.9432516 KHz 14.75195LAeq 45.7

01020304050607080

dB(A

)

Frequency (Hz)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 23-08-2017:03:08:51