Central Luzon Tourism Plan

download Central Luzon Tourism Plan

of 39

description

Tourism Plan for Central Luzon

Transcript of Central Luzon Tourism Plan

  • P a g e | 1

    I. Background/Rationale

    The last five years saw the world economies, particularly those of advanced nations, reel

    from the impacts of the global financial meltdown in the U.S. and from natural

    calamities that hit many parts of the world. Many economies teetered on the brink of

    collapse due to the crises, while activities were widely disrupted as an aftermath of the

    disasters. On the other hand, travel and tourism sustained its growth momentum, even

    picking up gas by breaching the one billion mark in 2012. The number of international

    tourists grew by 4 percent, expanding to 1.035 billion from 996 million in 2011. This

    growth helped cushion the impact of economic crisis in countries worldwide including

    the Philippines, with the tourism industry providing the revenues and creating the jobs

    that helped sustain the economy and kept it afloat.

    But while the countrys visitors swelled, the numbers remain a paltry share of the

    worlds total and a remote comparison of even the countries in the ASEAN. For example,

    while the number of tourists in the Philippines rose to a high of 3.9 million in 2011 as

    compared to only 3.5 million in 2010, inbound tourists already counted 24.7 million in

    Malaysia and 19.10 million in Thailand. Nevertheless, hopes are still high that with more

    creative marketing, the country will be able to attract more visitors and breach the 5-

    million mark as it already hit 4.3 million in 2012.

    A good number of the countrys foreign tourists are increasingly finding its way to

    Central Luzon because of more air traffic at the Clark International Airport (CIA). From

    about 39 flights per week in 2005, the current flight count has climbed to 224

    international flights and 72 domestic flights per week. This apparently increased access

    to Central Luzon, which coupled with improved road access, had visitor arrival surging

    up from only 396,569(147,808 foreign tourists) in 2005to 2.06 million(354,560 foreign

    tourists) in 2012.

    The sense, however, is that for a region endowed with an international gateway,

    tourism attractions and strategic location vis--vis Metro Manila the numbers would

    have been higher than what Central Luzon currently generates. Apart from the low

    reporting of accommodation establishments of their visitor count as apparent reason

    for the relatively low number, the general impression is that the region needs to step up

    and consolidate its efforts towards raising the quality of tourism experience in the

    region to enable it to compete with the rest of the major regional destinations like

    National Capital Region, Southern Tagalog, Central Visayas and Northern Mindanao.

    Perceiving therefore the need and opportunity to create a more vibrant tourism

    industry, the RDC initiated the creation of a special committee on tourism with the

    mandate to formulate a regional master plan for the development of tourism in Central

    Luzon. The Committee was formed on February 25, 2011 by virtue of RDC Resolution

  • P a g e | 2

    No. 03-03-2011. Mayor Edgardo Pamintuan of Angeles City was named chairman of this

    committee.

    Coinciding with the committees creation is the completion of the NTDP, which outlines

    the foci of development efforts for the promotion of tourism in the country. The plan

    provides for the strategic direction appropriate for each region or tourism development

    cluster, and as such is meant to serve as a guide for the local governments in the region

    in preparing their respective local tourism development plans.

    With the NTDP already providing the framework and development direction, the SCT

    formulated a regional tourism action plan instead of crafting a master plan. The RTAP is

    intended to identify the key interventions needed to propel regional tourism growth, as

    well as clarify and harmonize the roles of the various tourism stakeholders and local

    tourism areas.

    Essentially, with the RTAP providing the roadmap, the region aims to attract a bigger

    share of the growing number of tourists. As more tourists mean more business, more

    work and more income for the people of Central Luzon, the regional tourism action

    plan, as formulated, shall guide actions towards enhancing tourism development and

    its accompanying benefits.

  • P a g e | 3

    II. Planning Area

    a. Regional Economy

    Central Luzons economy is endowed with diverse resources, from the highlands to its

    coastal waters. The region has vast alluvial plains that produce an array of agricultural

    products from the countrys main staple, i.e. rice, among other crops, to livestock and

    aquaculture. These products make the region a major contributor to the countrys GVA in

    agriculture, fishery and forestry, accounting for 10 percent.

    Providing balance to agriculture are the regions

    services and manufacturing sectors which now

    account for the bigger share of the regional

    economy. In 2011, the services sector (that

    includes tourism) accounted for about 41 percent

    of the regions economy, the industry sector for 42

    percent and agriculture for 17 percent (Figure 1).

    Together, the three sectors serve as backbone of

    the regions economy, and help push the region as

    a vital cog in national economic growth and

    development.

    b. Growth Strategy

    With services, industry and agriculture as main

    economic drivers, Central Luzon adopted a three-

    pronged spatial strategy that strongly pushes for

    the promotion and development of the said

    sectors. Figure 2 shows the conceptual design of

    the regions growth strategy referred to as the W-

    Growth Corridor Strategy. The strategy involves

    the development of tourism in the western section

    of the W referred to as the tourism belt; industry

    in the central section or the industrial belt; and

    agriculture in the eastern section or the green belt.

    The strategy is based on the resource

    endowments, potentials and opportunities present in the various areas of the region. The

    tourism belt covering Bataan and Zambales provinces has a long coastline with fine

    beaches. The central section has been identified as the industrial corridor because of the

    presence of industrial estates or economic zones as well as the concentration of industrial

    establishments here. On the other hand, the green belt covering portions of Bulacan and

    AFF

    17%

    Services

    40%

    Industry

    43%

    Figure 2. W-Growth Corridor Strategy

    Figure 1. W-Growth Corridor Strategy

  • P a g e | 4

    Tarlac, Nueva Ecija and Aurora provinces has been described as such because of the

    primarily agricultural nature of this section of the regions economic activities.

    Nonetheless, the regional strategy also recognizes that each province may have something

    unique to offer especially in tourism and, therefore, encourages the promotion and

    development of such tourism potential region wide. This is to help achieve the regions

    vision of becoming a favored tourist destination in the country.

    III. Current Situation

    a. Global Trend

    Notwithstanding current global economic

    challenges, international tourism

    continued its way up, surpassing previous

    levels and making milestones. For the

    first time ever in 2012, tourist arrival

    count worldwide crossed the 1-billion

    mark, reaching 1.035 billion or a growth

    of 4 percent from last years 983 million

    tourists. Said growth is also the long-term

    average according to the UNWTO for the

    period 1995 to 2012 (Figure 3). For 2013,

    a similar or slightly slower pace (3-4

    percent) is expected taking into account

    prevailing global conditions, while the

    UNWTOs long-term outlook Tourism

    Towards 2030 projects an average growth of 3.8 percent for the period 2010-2020. If

    proven correct, this will help push international tourist level to 1.8 billion in 2030.

    The advanced economies led by France, remain to capture the bigger slice of the

    international tourists (53.1 percent), albeit the emerging economies performed relatively

    better at 4.1 percent (as opposed to 3.6 percent for the advanced economies) according to

    the UNWTO (Figure 4). The latter also reported that by region, Asia and the Pacific saw the

    highest relative growth at 7 percent, while by sub-region South-East Asia and North Africa

    recorded the largest increase in arrivals with 9 percent, followed by Central and Eastern

    Europe with 8 percent. In terms of share, however, Europe tops the list with a 51 percent

    share, followed by Asia and the Pacific (23 percent), Americas (16 percent), Africa (5

    percent) and the Middle East (5 percent). (Figure 5)

    Source: Worl d Touris m Organization (UNWTO)

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    19

    95

    19

    96

    19

    97

    19

    98

    19

    99

    20

    00

    20

    01

    20

    02

    20

    03

    20

    04

    20

    05

    20

    06

    20

    07

    20

    08

    20

    09

    20

    10

    20

    11

    20

    12

    (million)

    Figure 3. International Tourist Arrivals

  • P a g e | 5

    Source: UNWTO

    Europe

    52%

    Asia and the

    Pacific

    22%

    Americas

    16%

    Africa

    5%

    Middle East

    5%

    Table 1 shows that in 2011, the top ten

    destinations were: France (79.5 million),

    United States (62.3 million), China (57.6

    million), Spain (56.7 million), Italy (46.1

    million), Turkey (29.3 million), United

    Kingdom (29.2 million), Germany (28.4

    million), Malaysia (24.7 million), and

    Mexico (23.4 million). In the Asia-Pacific

    region, trailing China and Malaysia are:

    Hong Kong (22.32 million), Thailand

    (19.10 million), Macau (12.93 million),

    Singapore (10.39 million), South Korea

    (9.80 million), Indonesia (7.65 million),

    India (6.29 million) and Japan (6.22

    million).

    b. Local Performance

    In the Philippines, the trend has in general also been positive, with growth averaging 9

    percent in the last ten years. Although its share of the Asia-Pacific traffic remains

    comparatively minuscule, it is increasingly getting attention and recognized as one of the

    worlds best destinations by travel and tourism organizations. Thus, the outlook as earlier

    mentioned is promising with the DOT projecting volume of tourists to exceed the 5-million

    mark in 2013. The top ten sources of tourists for the country in 2012 as shown in Figure 6

    are: Korea (24.13 percent), USA (15.27 percent), Japan (9.65 percent), China (5.87 percent),

    Taiwan (5.07 percent), Australia (4.47 percent), Singapore (3.47 percent), Canada (2.90

    percent) and Malaysia (2.68 percent).

    Source: UNWTO

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    2000 2005 2010 2011 2012

    Arriv

    als

    (in

    m

    illi

    on

    )

    Advanced Economies

    Emerging Economies

    Country Volume (Mn)

    France 79.5

    United States 62.3

    China 57.6

    Spain 56.7

    Italy 46.1

    Turkey 29.3

    United Kingdom 29.2

    Germany 28.4

    Malaysia 24.7

    Mexico 23.4

    Source: UNWTO

    Figure 5. International Tourist Arrival by Region Figure 4. International Tourist Arrival by Economy

    Table 1. Top Ten Country Destinations, 2011

  • P a g e | 6

    Source: DOT

    19326771907226

    2291352

    26230842843345

    309199331394223017099

    3520000

    3917454

    4272811

    0

    500000

    1000000

    1500000

    2000000

    2500000

    3000000

    3500000

    4000000

    4500000

    2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    On the other hand, visitor arrival in Central Luzon (Figure 7) is also in the upswing, with

    positive annual growth from 2001 up to 2012. In 2011, the region breached the 1-million

    mark for the very first time when it recorded 1.7 million during the year [more tourists were

    captured this time because of the improved recording and reporting system of visitor survey

    adopted by the SBMA]. A 20-percent increase followed in 2012, bringing the figure to an all-

    time high record of 2.06 million.A bigger volume is expected this year and beyond with the

    coming in of more airlines: The Emirates is expected to launch flights in Clark in October

    2013.

    Domestic tourists share for about 70 percent of Central Luzons visitors, while foreign

    tourists account for 30 percent. Major drawers are Clark (for foreign tourists) and Subic (for

    domestic tourists) as illustrated in Figures 8 & 9.

    Source: DOT

    -

    500,000

    1,000,000

    1,500,000

    2,000,000

    2,500,000

    20

    01

    20

    02

    20

    03

    20

    04

    20

    05

    20

    06

    20

    07

    20

    08

    20

    09

    20

    10

    20

    11

    20

    12

    Domestic Foreign Total

    Figure 7. Region III Visitor Arrival, 2001-2012 Fig. 6. Visitor Arrival to the Philippines, 2002-2012

    Figure 8. Domestic Visitor Arrival,

    by Province/Tourism Area, 2011

    Figure 9. Foreign Visitor Arrival,

    by Province/Tourism Area, 2011

  • P a g e | 7

    c. Tourism Development Challenges

    The tourism industry faces a host of challenges, such as institutional weaknesses,

    underdeveloped and poor tourism products and destinations, as well as deficiencies in

    marketing and promotion. Poor coordination, under-preparation, and under-investments

    mark the sector reason for the country and the region in particular to underperform and

    fall behind other destinations. Annex A shows a list of the issues and challenges the regions

    tourism sector faces as identified in the NTDP, the SCAD Tourism Roadmap and from the

    results of the Central Luzon Tourism Summit.

    A comprehensive discussion of the challenges has already been made in the SCAD Tourism

    Roadmap, but a brief description is also given here if only to give another forum for

    recognition of these challenges as well as to provide a fresh perspective of the tourism

    situation in the region.

    Tourism Product Development and Marketing

    Central Luzons wealth of diversity is also reflected in its tourism products or attractions,

    with natural, cultural to man-made recreations dotting the regions tourism landscape.

    However, it lags behind in visitor statistics compared with other regions of the country even

    as the region lies geographically proximate to Metro Manila, which serves as the biggest

    local source-market for tourism. If any this only reflects the lack of competitiveness or

    readiness of the regions products to meet visitors expectations and needs. In this regard,

    the sector needs more help in terms of developing and packaging tourist

    attractions/destinations into something more competitive and sufficiently interesting as to

    stimulate curiosity and visits.

    As earlier mentioned the regions tourism attractions are numerous and varied, from the

    West Philippine Sea to the Pacific, and across all seven provinces. Many of these attractions,

    however, are underdeveloped or poorly maintained hence they do not get the desired

    attention or interest. Albeit the number of visitors is growing, these largely converge in the

    provinces of Zambales and Pampanga, or in particular the Subic-Clark area. As tourists go

    where they naturally could gain tourism experience, the influx of tourists in the SCAD

    Corridor only suggests that this destination has more to offer than the other

    areas/provinces. Still the general observation is that the region has little to offer in terms of

    experience, with the attractions, although numerous, not connected or organized into

    interesting packages. A big factor to this is the fragmented nature of tourism planning and

    development, with the latter being a responsibility of local governments. This being the

    case, there is little of joint or collaborative action that is done to make tourism promotion

    and development more efficient and produce more impact.

    The responsibility of the LGUs in the formulation, implementation and monitoring of their

    own local tourism development plans is reflected in the National Tourism Act of 2009 under

    Rule VIII (Shared Responsibilities of National and Local Governments) where it states that

    LGUs shall prepare, adopt, implement and monitor their local tourism development plans,

  • P a g e | 8

    enforce standards for tourism enterprises and collect statistical data for tourism purposes.

    The same Act likewise emphasizes the need for DOT and DILG to integrate all local tourism

    development plans by LGUs in the formulation and annual updating of the national tourism

    development plan.

    Marketing is also not given enough push because of limited resources, lack of organized

    tourism packages and poor coordination among tourism industry players. There is little also

    of market research to generate the information needed for sound tourism product planning

    and development. At best such information or task is left to the central agency or individual

    industry player to generate or undertake. As provided for in the same Act, LGUs shall

    implement a system for the collection and reporting of tourism statistics (including global

    tourism market trends), status of tourism plans and programs, as well as inventory of

    tourism resources in their area of responsibility for submission to the Department of

    Tourism.

    Access

    Travel between points outside of the Subic-Clark Corridor is hampered by traffic; inefficient,

    inadequate and uncoordinated transport system; and the lack of directional signage and

    visitor information centers from which tourists could get assistance or information. Within

    Subic and Clark, tourists are faced by the lack of regular public transport system and high

    transport fares. Regular public transport is unavailable in strategic areas such as the airport

    terminal where passengers are bound to seek low-fare transport service en route to the

    main gate of Clark. In the absence of this, passengers are left at the mercy of overcharging

    taxi drivers or car rental companies.

    On the other hand, access to major tourist destinations or tourist centers in the region has

    been a major concern of the department and for this reason has put in place the so-called

    DOT-DPWH convergence program where roads leading to destinations have been identified

    and accorded funding by DPWH.

    Governance and Human Resource Development

    The challenge in this concern is in gathering and harmonizing the individual actions of

    industry players, so that the impact of such actions is felt and equitably enjoyed by all

    players in the region. The DOT is doing its best to bring together the industrys key players

    to pave the way for concerted action. Such effort, however, remains to be translated to

    tangible actions in terms of delivering the necessary quality and quantity of products and

    services that tourists look for.

    Concerns needing attention include improving systems and policies for facilitating tourism

    investment, and developing capacities for tourism planning and for delivering quality

    services. For this purpose, the Department of Trade and Industry Region III may well be

    the support system to promote investment in tourism under its trade and investment

    promotions group while the Department of Tourism, in coordination with TESDA and

    private tourism-related institutions/schools, may well handle the capacity building program

  • P a g e | 9

    for tourism planning, delivery of quality service and conduct of human resource

    development among workers in tourism-related establishments and services.

    In summary, lifting the status of the region in the tourism market necessarily requires

    more than putting in the necessary resources to build the attractions, but also establishing

    and piecing together the institutions and systems essential for the efficient development,

    promotion and management of tourism.

  • P a g e | 10

    IV. The Region in the Context of the National Tourism

    Development Plan

    The national government through the DOT recently completed the preparation of the National

    Tourism Development Plan 2011 2016. The plan outlines how the country shall build its

    competitive strength as a tourist destination and realize its vision of becoming a must

    experience destination in Asia. The plan takes on a spatial strategy which involves the

    development of tourism cluster destinations the identification of which was based mainly on

    the presence of access infrastructure or gateways and the areas tourism potential.

    Because of its airport, sea port and excellent road network, Central Luzon has been identified in

    the NTDP as one of the priority cluster destinations. The plan is to build on the regions strength

    in the areas of: entertainment/amusement, sports, beach resort, events, MICE, ecotourism,

    wellness, medical and retirement tourism.

    A profile of the region, which describes the regions tourism development potential,

    opportunities and needs, is here shown in Table 2. It would be on this basis that the regional

    tourism action plan is formulated.

    Table 2. Strategic Cluster Destination Profile

    Name of Cluster NP-6 Central Luzon Cluster

    Location &

    Composition

    The Cluster comprises seven Tourism Development Areas, namely: NP-6A Subic-Clark-Tarlac

    Corridor, NP-6B Nueva Ecija, NP-6C Pampanga, NP-6D Bulacan, NP-6E Zambales, NP-6F Bataan

    Coast and Hinterland, and NP-6G Aurora.

    Main Tourism

    Resources / Assets

    Coastal beaches and coves, protected forested mountain landscapes and ecotourism resources,

    rich cultural heritagehistoric sites and buildings, customs, tradition, cuisine and festivals of its

    peoples, and its leisure, entertainment, sport and meetings facilities.

    Access Direct international air services to Clark and Subic and by road (mostly expressway) from Metro

    Manila, as well as from Northern Luzon.

    Tourist

    Accommodation

    Facilities

    2,089 hotel rooms in DOT-accredited facilities located mainly in urban centers operating at

    +65% room occupancy. Many smaller scale hotels, resorts, inns, and guesthouses are not

    accredited.

    Tourism Metrics 533,847 arrivals in tourist accommodation in 2008 of which 165,322 were international and

    368,525 were domestic arrivals. 2000 to 2008 CAGR was 10.65%. The Subic-Clark-Tarlac

    Corridor accounted for around 60% of total arrivals.

    Development Potential

    Internal Strengths Internal Weaknesses

    Clark and Subic international gateways

    Well- developed road access to and within the

    cluster

    Substandard access and visitor infrastructure and services

    at most tourist sites

    Insufficient accommodation capacity to allow for sustained

  • P a g e | 11

    Diversity of tourism assets

    Strong private sector regional tourism

    association

    growth

    Weak public sector coordination and tourism governance

    External Opportunities External Threats

    Expanding international and domestic tourism

    markets

    Positioning the Cluster as a major mixed use

    tourism destination attracting niche to mass

    international and domestic markets

    Consolidate Clark as the premier international

    tourism gateway to the Philippines

    Uncoordinated and uncontrolled development leading to

    overdevelopment, congestion, pollution and loss of natural

    and cultural heritage value

    Volcanic eruptionsMt. Pinatubo and earthquakes

    Typhoons

    Market Product Development Opportunities

    Developing beach and island resort, leisure, entertainment sport and ecotourism facilities as well as major multi-

    purpose convention and exhibition facilities directed at the regional international and domestic tourist markets

    supported by broad range of nature and culture sightseeing activities.

    Key Products: Nature Based, Sun and Beach, Cultural Tourism

    Strategic Products/Markets: MICE, Leisure & Shopping, Health & Wellness, Cruise Tourism

    Opportunity/Niche: Nautical Tourism, Education, Retirement Tourism

    Key Development Deficiencies and Needs

    Access &

    Connectivity

    Completion of phase 2 of terminal 1 (budget carrier terminal) and second terminal at Clark

    Completion of national road improvements linking the provinces within the cluster and to

    the clusters to the North

    Gaining access to legacy flight carriers or markets

    Tourist Site &

    Attraction

    Development

    Improving last mile access road access and at-site visitor infrastructure and operations and

    maintenance to key natural and cultural heritage tourist sites coastal, island and mountain

    landscapes and protected areas

    Tourist

    Accommodation

    Needs

    Develop small, medium and large beach resorts

    Develop major leisure, entertainment, sport, and convention and events facilities in Clark,

    Subic and Tarlac

    Develop extensive day tour sightseeing, theme attraction, adventure, and sports products.

    Well-maintained facilities and services in every tourism destination (airports, parks etc.)

    Forecasts Arrivals 2010 2016

    Baseline (2010) Low Growth Scenario 2016 High Growth Scenario 2016

    Foreign: 145,767

    Domestic: 446,338

    Total: 592,105

    Foreign: 195,342

    Domestic: 598,136

    Total: 793,478

    Foreign: 435, 258

    Domestic: 790,715

    Total: 1,225,973

    Note: Lifted from the NTDP

  • P a g e | 12

    V. Action Plan

    Figure 10 illustrates the framework and the general direction of action towards achieving

    tourism development in the region. It shows how the Central Luzon Tourism Action Plan

    (CLTAP) will take off from the development approach and strategies identified in the NTDP, and

    contribute to achieving the national tourism goals and vision.

    Relevant to said pursuit, the CLTAP is therefore geared towards building the regions own

    tourism competitive strength, with focus on the measures or steps falling under the three

    major thrusts of the NTDP: a) improving market access and connectivity; b) developing and

    marketing competitive tourist destinations and products; and c) improving tourism

    institutional, governance and human resource capacities.

    Figure 10. Central Luzon Tourism Development Framework

  • P a g e | 13

    Core Strategy

    Development of Tourism Centers and Themes

    Said activities shall build on the main strategy, which is to develop a core area in each province

    as main attraction or service center, while developing Subic and Clark as the nuclei or hub for

    tourism in the region, with these areas providing the gateways.The core areas shall be called

    the tourism centers of the region. While the strategy does not preclude the development of

    other areas or attractions in the provinces, priority attention shall be given to developing the

    tourism centers as the regions major tourism showcase. The idea is to have in each province a

    convergence point where visitors would have the amenities, facilities and attractions of

    interests to tourists all in one place. Each tourism center would promote a different theme or

    carry a unique feature that would engage tourists to a different experience as they go from one

    province to another. This would allow also the province or tourism center to stand alone and

    provide visitors a feeling of must experience even without seeing the other areas of the

  • P a g e | 14

    region. As such, province would have its unique attractions and capacity to meet tourist

    expectations.

    Figure 11 shows an illustration of the regions basic design concept or core strategy. The

    colored points or circles are the tourism centers, with the biggest circle as the gateway and

    jump off point. The arrows show that from the gateway, tourists can choose to go to any of the

    various tourism centers as destination.

    For the themes, the provinces have chosen to develop their tourism centers around the

    following concept:

    Province/TDA Core Theme

    Figure 11. Tourism Development Areas/Service Centers

  • P a g e | 15

    As earlier mentioned, development of tourism centers will be pursued taking into consideration

    the core potential of the provinces. The target is to develop the areas or tourism centers into

    hubs of attractions in the respective provinces, by creating a physically appealing and secure

    environment and by making available the amenities, facilities, services and infrastructure

    needed.

    The strategy will be supported by the following interventions to be carried out in the next four

    (4) years, from 2013-2016. Such actions/measures shall serve as platform for LGUs and other

    tourism stakeholders for development of tourism in their respective sphere of influence. Table

    5shows the plan in matrix form with corresponding expected outputs or outcome.

    A. Developing and Marketing Competitive Tourist Destination and Products

    Product Development

    Aurora Surfing and Country Get Away

    Bataan Historic Place of Valor

    Bulacan Arts, Cultural and Historical Center

    Nueva Ecija Agri-Tourism and Nature Adventure Destination

    Pampanga Culinary Hotspot

    Subic-Clark Leisure, Sports, MICE Hub

    Tarlac Pilgrimage and Ecotourism Site

    Zambales Beach and Mountain Hideaway

  • P a g e | 16

    Tourists travel beyond borders for leisure and fun and to experience and learn from what

    other places have to offer. It is important therefore that tourist destinations are ready to

    provide or meet the expectations of tourists, otherwise, anything less may diminish tourists

    interests and enthusiasm and limit the opportunities for return visits or free word-of-mouth

    promotion.

    Earlier assessment of the regions tourist attractions describes these as needing

    enhancements, not being enough and not connected. Although the region has the

    advantage of access, it is not the preferential choice as statistics also indicate. Thus, the

    challenge for the region is to develop its tourist attractions into something that would truly

    be a must experience for tourists.

    Below are the steps the region shall take towards achieving the above-said objective:

    1. Organize clusters of tourism development areas.

    The region shall pursue clustering of the TDAs as a strategy in the development and

    promotion of tourism destinations. This is to facilitate integrated planning and

    convergence of efforts of areas in the cluster --- such approaches being necessary in

    coming up with tourism products capable of generating a bigger impact than that

    created by individual TDA. The approach is likewise recommended to help in organizing

    and promoting tour packages covering attractions from one or several TDAs. The TDAs

    shall be divided into four (4) clusters (see Figure 12):

    C-1: West Central Luzon Cluster consisting of Zambales, Bataan, SCADC, the Subic

    Freeport and Olongapo City;

    C-2: North Central Luzon Cluster with Pampanga, Angeles City, CSEZ, Tarlac and

    SCADC;

    C-3: South Central Luzon Cluster with Bulacan and Pampanga; and

    C-4: East Central Luzon covering Nueva Ecija and Aurora

    Figure 12. Central Luzon Tourism Clusters

  • P a g e | 17

    2. Rehabilitation/redevelopment of TDAs

    2.1. Formulate local and site tourism development and management plans for

    enhancing the regions tourist attractions.

    Each tourism development area is assigned a product theme based on the areas natural

    assets and tourism potential. However, much of the existing related tourist attractions,

    including facilities, in the TDAs are underdeveloped and needing enhancement. As such,

    local development plans including site development and management plans shall be

    prepared to lay down how the attractions and facilities in the TDAs may be enhanced to

    provide tourists high quality experience.

    2.2. Site improvement

  • P a g e | 18

    In enhancing the tourist destinations, attention shall be given to increasing the activities

    that tourists can engage in including the following:

    Developing unique features, such as architecture, customs and traditions;

    Enhancing the aesthetic character/environment or beautification;

    Open space/amusement or green park development;

    Development of walk paths, local art or craft shops;

    Providing areas or venues for sports or outdoor recreation;

    3. Develop new market-competitive destinations and products.

    The clusters long-run objective is to develop new market- competitive destinations and

    products, identify areas of complementation, and accordingly work towards said end.

    One promising venture that may be explored is the development of Subic as one

    destination in several island-hopping cruise packages, the like of Subic-Puerto Galera-

    Boracay-Palawan cruise. Priority shall also be given to developing the regions strength

    as identified in the NTDP: entertainment/amusement, food, sports, beach resort,

    events, MICE, ecotourism, wellness, medical and retirement tourism. Developing these

    attractions would be done according to the TDAs core themes, to facilitate

    complementation of attractions as well as to ensure that resources are invested in areas

    or activities that would have a bigger chance of being sustained. The DOT, ATOCEL and

    the appropriate agencies (i.e. DENR for ecotourism; DTI and PRA for wellness, medical

    and retirement tourism) shall engage themselves in identifying the attractions to be

    developed and in preparing the plan for each category of attraction (i.e. ecotourism

    development plan, retirement tourism development plan, beach development plan,

    etc.).

    For ecotourism, the sites initially identified for development are:

  • P a g e | 19

    The potential of the region, particularly Clark and Subic, as destination or site for big

    conventions shall be looked into. Currently, only small to medium-scale conventions are

    being catered to by the freeports because of limited facilities. Efforts hence shall be

    taken towards establishing the appropriate incentives for encouraging investment on

    large-scale convention facilities.

    The region shall also look into opportunities for developing integrated resorts such as

    the like of Resort World in Manila, Genting Highland of Kuala Lumpur and Sentosa in

    Singapore. This could be an output of the clustering approach or of individual local

    government unit or private group or individual.

    4. Establish Tourism Enterprise Zones and relevant incentives for encouraging tourism

    investments.

    Relatedly, to encourage investments in tourism (i.e. investments in new facilities,

    expansion, rehabilitation or upgrading), the TDAs shall look into the establishment of

    Tourism Enterprise Zones and the development of the appropriate incentives for such

    endeavors. Identified zones shall be delineated or mapped and incorporated in the land

    use plans of the municipalities or cities encompassing the TEZs.

    5. Conduct cultural mapping and implement preservation and development of cultural and

    historical heritage sites.

  • P a g e | 20

    Another priority as emphasized in the NTDP is cultural tourism. Efforts are now underway in

    various parts of the country for the mapping of these areas cultural heritage. The same

    shall be pursued in the region, with the mapped sites subsequently preserved and

    developed into tourist attractions for the perpetual appreciation of both local and

    foreign visitors. To encourage such development, local governments shall put in place

    the necessary policies and incentives.

    6. Develop or improve accommodation and other service facilities

    The region could benefit from more and better accommodation facilities as these were

    described as relatively fewer than in other regions and of poorer quality. Hence, efforts

    shall be taken towards establishing the appropriate incentives for encouraging

    investments in developing or rehabilitating accommodation facilities and for

    maintaining these. Programs and policies for monitoring and regulation of such facilities

    shall also be put in place to ensure sustainability and continuous improvement. Priority

    or focus shall be given to tourist service centers or urban core.

    Marketing and Promotion

    Equally essential in the promotion of tourism is effective marketing and promotion. This

    entails, among others, raising awareness on tourist destinations and providing easy access

    to information that would help tourists decide and plan on their travel.

    To facilitate marketing and promotion of the regions tourist destinations, the following

    shall be undertaken:

    1. Tourism branding

    The region shall engage its stakeholders in the formulation of a tourism brand for the

    region. More than an advertising tool, tourism branding shapes and bestows on a

    tourism destination an identity uniquely its own, the purpose of which is to build

    recognition of and to elicit interest and excitement about the destination. Tourism

    brands are also developed to differentiate a tourist destination from its competitors,

    and to direct efforts on the relevant tourism development interventions or areas.

    2. Target marketing

    The region shall initially focus its marketing efforts on existing and priority destinations

    or attractions, and then to gradually extend to new products. To optimize use of limited

    resources, the region shall adopt target marketing as an approach, which is

    implementing programs or campaigns directed at specific target markets, such as beach

  • P a g e | 21

    buffs, culinary enthusiasts, ecotourists, sports/adventure enthusiasts. Use of multi-

    media shall increasingly but judiciously utilized to generate as much interest as is widely

    possible, particularly in the domestic market as the regions main source.

    3. Harmonize promotional collaterals and expand use of other marketing media.

    Industry stakeholders, i.e. DOT, LGUs, SBMA, CDC, private organizations, shall review

    and harmonize promotional collaterals for their efficient production and greater impact.

    Travel guides/ flyers/brochures shall be unified and made available in visitor information

    centers. Also, the internet and other forms of social media will be used extensively for

    posting information or travel guides to include important information such as transport

    routes and cost.

    4. Organize and encourage participation of tour operators in local tourism promotion.

    Tour operators in Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Aurora and Zambales in particular (other areas

    have organized tour operators) shall be encouraged to organize and participate in

    promoting destinations in their areas. Presently, tour operators are focused on the

    outbound market because tourism packages from outside of the region are more

    mature and ready for selling.

    5. Develop day-trip and weekend tours.

    In the short term period, the clusters shall work on organizing their day-trip and

    weekend tours or packages. The clusters shall work closely with tour operators to

    develop tour packages with a better chance of being marketed. For this attention may

    be given to developing:

    Nature and eco-trail

    Historical and cultural trail

    Culinary trail

    Outdoor recreation trail

    Green trail

    6. Market research build-up and database management

    Market research shall be intensified via public and private sector collaboration. Apart

    from improving DOTs market research function, the agency shall tap into the network

    of academic institutions offering tourism as a course for research support. Likewise, the

    possibility of extending DOT and ATOCEL partnership to cover research shall be

    examined, while the private sector (e.g. hotels and travel agencies) may be engaged to

    conduct market surveys. The DOT shall work with these institutions in identifying the

    needed market research and the mechanics for partnership. Ultimately, the DOT shall

  • P a g e | 22

    serve as the repository of all data and researches done on the industry and by various

    entities.

    B. Improving Tourism Institutional, Governance and Human Resource

    Capacities

    Sustaining tourism requires that attractions are not only present in the right quantity and

    quality, but the relevant support institutions, systems and manpower are robust and

    adequately equipped to respond to the needs of the industry. Thus, steps to enhancing the

    institutions capacities for governance of the regions tourism sector and equipping of the

    regions human resources shall also be pursued. Some of the measures are described

    below:

    1. Pursue the development and implementation of a tourism enterprise accreditation

    system.

    All efforts to developing tourist attractions and luring tourists to come would be futile if

    the quality of tourism enterprises and services are proven to be inferior or below

    standards. The latter undermines customer satisfaction and ultimately drives away

    tourists. In a recent world travel and tourism competitiveness index report, the

    Philippines has been shown not only to lag behind other ASEAN countries but that its

    index has fallen farther. In this connection, RA 9593 has made it a mandate of the DOT

    to ensure the promotion and enforcement of tourism standards and the accreditation of

    tourism enterprises, to help enhance the delivery of the countrys tourism services and

    push it to a more competitive level.

    Consequently, the DOT Region 3 together with Angeles City and other parties had taken

    the initial steps of improving and instituting a system of accreditation in the region, with

    Angeles City serving as the pilot implementing channel. An output of this collaboration is

    a guidebook for tourism industry frontliners, investors and expatriates. But as the

    guidebook and accreditation system are yet in their initial runs, refinement of these will

    continue. Once the final form is prepared, it will then be disseminated to other LGUs or

    TDAs for possible replication. To facilitate adoption by other LGUs, RDC endorsement of

    the same shall be secured through the RDC Special Committee on Tourism.

    Subsequently, LGUs shall institute their set of policies governing the operation and

    activities of tourism enterprises, which shall include rules and regulations on compliance

    to standards, monitoring, and penalties for violations.

  • P a g e | 23

    2. Implement streamlining of business permit and licensing system and lower cost of doing

    business.

    The region has already made headway in the streamlining of LGU business permit and

    licensing system and consequently in reducing the cost of doing business. Effort on this

    continues with the DTI and the DILG collaborating to ensure a 100-percent adoption by

    LGUs. As the latter is a work in progress and needs persistency of pursuit for this to

    materialize, the RDC shall look into ways of encouraging LGUs to implement BPLS

    streamlining and reduce permitting and licensing cost.

    3. Institutionalize local tourism offices and build capacities of LGUs

    The LGUs are at the forefront of actions in tourism development and promotion. While

    the Tourism Act mandates the creation of local tourism offices, budgetary constraints

    are preventing LGUs to create such an office. Few LGUs have people assigned to tourism

    development while for some those designated are handling multiple roles and are

    functioning in an ad hoc capacity. The effect is that while LGUs have identified tourism

    as one of development areas, attention to this as well as efforts fall short of a holistic

    and winning tourism development.

    What is needed and, therefore, what will be pursued is the promotion of local

    institutionalization of tourism offices or strengthening of such an office if one already

    exists through equipping of the appropriate manpower as well as provision of budget

    for the needed promotion and development of tourism assets. Consequently, the RDC

    shall help by advocating or endorsing to the concerned LGUs the establishment of local

    tourism offices and to DBM for the review of the funding possibilities for the local

    tourism offices operating budget.

    In conjunction with establishing an office, building capacities of LGUs to manage local

    tourism affairs shall also be a priority undertaking, with DOT providing the necessary

    support through trainings.

    4. Establish an Investors Assistance Office (IAO)

    While creation of local tourism offices responsible for coordinating and promoting

    tourism development at the local level (i.e. provincial and municipal) shall be pursued,

    the region shall also look into the establishment of an Investors Assistance Office at the

    regional level that would connect and integrate current development and opportunities

    at the local level. Specifically, the task of the IAO would be to help promote investment,

    provide information that would help investors decide where to put in their investment,

    and facilitate in the investment process.

  • P a g e | 24

    The region shall initially look at existing structures, such as the NERBAC, ATOCEL, and

    the SCAD, as possible mechanism or facility for tourism investment facilitation. NERBAC

    and SCAD are currently into investment facilitation, but their scope of work is limited to

    local businesses for NERBAC and the Subic-Clark-Tarlac corridor for SCAD. One option is

    to establish areas of complementation of these two offices to create a network and

    system for responding to investment facilitation needs. ATOCEL could be tapped for

    support in terms of information and other forms of assistance as appropriate in the

    members respective areas. Another option is the creation of an entirely new office that

    would be the hub for all investment promotion and facilitation in the region on tourism.

    This could take the form of an authority or commission especially dedicated to tourism

    investment facilitation and promotion in the region.

    5. Strengthen multi-stakeholder partnerships and industry integration

    Tourism is more than a governments job. It is a pursuit that requires concerted

    partnerships among the sectors stakeholders. Vital in said alliances is the private sector,

    this being at the frontline of tourism activities, i.e. providing the products and services

    enjoyed by tourists. Getting the sector to engage in the decision-making processes for

    the promotion of tourism is not only beneficial but critical to ensuring sustainability of

    tourism.

    Local tourism councils have been formed in all TDAs but most are inactive. Tapping on

    the wealth of public and private resources to stir tourism development shall be pursued

    to help bring the region to where it wants to go. Corollary, revival and strengthening of

    said councils shall be among the activities, including a look at a proposal to increase

    private sector membership in the councils, as well as encouraging sub-sector integration

    in the private sector. The latter is to have better coordination among sub-sector

    members, encourage these to carry only one voice and to participate more actively in

    the development process, to complement those in the public sector such as the

    Association of Tourism Officers of Central Luzon (ATOCEL).

    6. Strengthen DOTs role as facilitator and coordinator of regional tourism development

    and promotion.

    DOT support is especially crucial in building capacities of LGUs in planning for and

    responding to the challenges to tourism development and management at the local

    level. However, active and effective rendering of its role requires that it is equipped with

    the necessary resources, both human and capital, or that it taps on other institutions to

    help provide the necessary assistance. Relatedly, DOT shall seek to strengthen its

    manpower complement and budget, and to network with other entities in providing

    assistance to LGUs and other industry stakeholders. It shall also strengthen coordination

  • P a g e | 25

    and partnership with ATOCEL, and assist the association develop its capacity for helping

    promote tourism development.

    7. Public and Private Resource Mobilization

    As public funds are most often not enough to finance tourism promotion and

    development, building on public-private sector collaboration is vital to securing the

    resources for supporting the sectors pursuits. This is also to ensure that limited

    government funds are invested in areas where it would most matter, such as in

    infrastructure support and enhancing government services, while leaving or allowing

    private sector participation in areas where these have the expertise such as in site

    development and marketing. This way also the region is able to ensure that no area is

    left out in the process of developing the sector.

    To help augment national government resources, the local government units shall

    examine and institute measures for raising local funds, such as from taxes or fees from

    tourism- related activities or enterprises.

    8. Develop competent and productive tourism workforce.

    Tourism is a people to people enterprise. It needs good, competent workforce to deliver

    the services that would meet customer satisfaction. Superb service in addition to

    excellent attractions guarantees repeat visits or patronage. Hence, it shall be the

    regions quest to develop the quality of human resources fitted for the industrys

    requirement. This shall be done by tapping on the formal and informal institutions to

    provide the necessary education and training. Consequently, a review and matching of

    the needed skills and training courses shall be done through the combined effort of the

    DOT, TESDA, DepEd and DOT-accredited tourism schools including state universities and

    colleges. Specific attention shall be given to tour guiding which is basically lacking in the

    region. The target is to train service providers including transport service operators in

    tour guiding for additional value added.

    9. Improve governance in the area of safety, security and in dealing with tourists

    Tourist safety and security is fundamental to tourism promotion and development.

    Depending on the security risk, tourists either flock to or shun going to a destination.

    Hence, maintaining peace and security is a necessary condition for tourism to thrive.

    While there is already a PNP tourist protection program, a boost in implementation

    would go a long way into providing a secure and safe climate for tourists. Increased

    visibility in tourist convergence points shall be ensured that includes installation of

  • P a g e | 26

    tourist police assistance outposts in strategic locations and provision of the necessary

    tools for police quick response. In addition, barangay orientation shall also be

    undertaken to raise tourism awareness and elicit cooperation in the maintenance of

    peace and order in the concerned barangays.

    10. Develop and implement programs for safeguarding vulnerable groups

    Tourism promotion and development should not be at the expense of vulnerable

    groups, especially women, children and the indigenous groups. Hence, consideration for

    these sectors protection from possible adverse impact must be taken in tourism

    planning and promotion. Safeguarding of the welfare of such vulnerable groups requires

    the collaboration of DOT, DSWD and other relevant parties in the conduct of social

    awareness campaigns, and implementation of programs on response and enforcement

    of related statutes.

    11. Formulate and adopt local tourism codes

    Codes are necessary guide for action or set of principles that act as limits or boundaries

    to what individuals and entities can or cannot do. As service standards or guidelines for

    regulating and managing actions, tourism codes therefore are formulated to ensure that

    tourism development is sustainable.

    Currently, only Olongapo City and Angeles City have legislated tourism codes. To ensure

    that growth from tourism is inclusive and that no area in Central Luzon is left out, the

    region shall hence encourage LGUs and other relevant agencies (e.g. DENR for

    ecotourism) to craft their tourism code.

    C. Improving Market Access and Connectivity

    Infrastructure is key to mobility and access of tourists to tourism destinations. This makes it

    hence an indispensable component that government must provide among other elements

    in order that tourists may be encouraged to visit. Ease of access may be facilitated through

    provision of paved roads and transport facilities that are convenient, safe and reasonably

    priced. In ensuring this for the regions visitors, the following measures shall be pursued:

    1. Study how to rationalize transport fares and organize transport services from the Clark

    International Airport to points of destination to ensure reliable and reasonably cost

    transport service. In the interim, the region shall work on setting the transport cost from

    point to point and posting such information online or on signages in transport terminals.

  • P a g e | 27

    This shall be realized through the collaborative effort of the relevant agencies/entities:

    DOT, CIAC, LTFRB, DOTC, CDC, SBMA, transport organizations, LGUs.

    2. Provide alternative transport modes other than land-based transport. The potential of

    sea-based transport shall be explored especially in the western seaboard. The PPA shall

    be requested to look into the possibility of reviving port operations, such as in Orion, to

    provide alternative mode of transport connecting Central Luzon to Metro Manila and

    other islands.

    3. Identify and construct priority road infrastructure that shall connect the regions

    gateways with the tourist service centers/destinations and attractions.

    A number of road infrastructure projects have already been identified under the DOT-

    DPWH Convergence Program (see Figure 13). Tables 3 & 4 show the list of approved

    projects and proposed projects for 2012 to 2014. The DOT shall continue to work with

    the LGUs and the DPWH for other road projects to be proposed for the succeeding

    years.

    4. Develop minor tourism infrastructure such as visitor information centers (VICs), rest

    stops, and directional signage.

    The above-said services are needed for ease of mobility and travel convenience. The

    target is for all TDAs to have their VICs and to establish these in areas frequented by

    tourists, such as in malls and major service centers.

    Directional signage on the tourist spots shall also be put up along major and minor

    thoroughfares including expressways. Also, signage providing direction to transport

    terminals or routes shall be installed to help tourists find their way in and around the

    region. Public and private resources or partnerships shall be tapped to help put up the

    signages. Annex B lists the tourist spots to be indicated in the signages.

    5. Ease flow of traffic

    Ease of access means not only the presence of roads but also easy or manageable

    traffic. Improving traffic particularly in tourist service centers and gateways shall be

    pursued to make travel in and around the region more convenient for visitors and

    residents alike.

  • P a g e | 28

    Figure 13. tourism Road Infrastructure 2012/2013 Approved/Proposed TRIP

  • P a g e | 29

    Table 3. TRIPs with Approved Allocation

    Name/Location of Project Allocation (P000) Status

    I. FY 2012

    1. Pantabangan-Canili Bypass Road

    Aurora

    100,000 Phase 1: 27.19 % completed

    (Target Date of Completion:

    February 2014)

    2. Aquino Byway Manila North Road (via

    Mabalacat-Magalang Road)

    Pampanga

    100,000 1.5% completed (TCD: April 16,

    2014); suspended due to RROW

    issues

    II. Proposed for FY 2013

    1. Pantabangan-Canili Bypass Road

    Aurora

    150,000 Phase 2 : Ongoing preparation of

    Program of Work (POW)

    2. Sabang, Baler Road

    Aurora

    50,000 22.2% completed (TCD: October

    2013)

    3. Clark-Angeles-Magalang Road

    Angeles City

    100,000 Target Start: May 2013

    TCD: May 2014

    4. West Circumferential Road

    (Friendship Highway, Angeles City

    section)

    100,000 Bidded out/Post Bid evaluation

    ongoing

    5. Aquino Byway MNR

    (via San Jose MalinoAnao Road and

    del Rosario-Calulut)

    San Fernando City, Pampanga

    150,000 Ongoing survey works for the

    preparation of plans thru

    outsource by BOD

    6. Lourdes-Clark Airbase Road

    Tarlac

    100,000

    Ongoing As staked survey

    Target Start: May 2013

    TCD: January 2014

    Source: DOT-RIII and DPWH-III

    Note: Status as of June 20, 2013

  • P a g e | 30

    Table 4. TRIPs Proposed for FY 2014

    Name of Project Project Cost

    (P000)

    Location

    Bagac-Mariveles Road (Upgrading)

    (access road leading to Anvaya Cove and

    Bataan Technology Park)

    572,000.000 Bataan

    Paseo del Congreso (access road leading to

    Barasaoin Church and Casa Real)

    152,988.000 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Duhat-

    Bunducan Road, Bocaue, Bulacan(access

    road leading to Ciudad de Victoria)

    109,005.843 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Bocaue Sta.

    Maria via Taal Road Bocaue, Bulacan(access

    rd leading to Ciudad de Victoria)

    273,929.910 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Bocaue Old

    Road, Bocaue, Bulacan(access rd leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    53,730.682 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Bintog-Liciada-

    Pandi Rd. (access road leading to Ciudad de

    Victoria)

    238,007.016

    Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of SantolBintog

    Rd, Balagtas, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    170,684.162 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Igulot Municipal

    Rd, Bocaue, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    7,584.872 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Balubaran Rd,

    Bocaue, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    13,977.134 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Bolocan Road,

    Bocaue, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    12,428.427 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Binang 1st Road,

    Bocaue, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    5,999.119 Bulacan

    Concreting/Improvement of Binang 2nd Rd,

    Bocaue, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    1,734.521 Bulacan

    Bocaue-San Jose-Bagbaguin-Puso Rd., Sta.

    Maria, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    63,412.039 Bulacan

  • P a g e | 31

    Name of Project Project Cost

    (P000)

    Location

    Widening of Sta. Maria Bridge and

    Approaches (access road leading to Ciudad

    de Victoria)

    75,324.423 Bulacan

    Construction of San Gabriel By-Pass Bridge,

    Sta. Maria, Bulacan(access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    73,910.234 Bulacan

    San Gabriel_MahabangParang Rd., Sta.

    Maria, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    64,190.024 Bulacan

    Paso-San Gabriel Rd., Sta. Maria, Bulacan

    (access road leading to Ciudad de Victoria)

    67,280.390 Bulacan

    Paso-TabingBakod Rd., Sta. Maria, Bulacan

    (access road leading to Ciudad de Victoria)

    48,509.787 Bulacan

    San-Gabriel-Camangyanan-Kaybitin Rd., Sta.

    Maria, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    61,293.354 Bulacan

    Duhat-Marilao Exit Rd. (service road), Sta.

    Maria, Bulacan (access road leading to

    Ciudad de Victoria)

    32,028.232 Bulacan

    TabingBukod-Bagbaguin By-Pass Rd., Sta.

    Maria (access road leading to Ciudad de

    Victoria)

    15,692.862 Bulacan

    San Gabriel By-Pass Rd., Sta. Maria, Bulacan

    (access road leading to Ciudad de Victoria)

    20,612.135 Bulacan

    Patubig Road, Marilao, Bulacan (access road

    leading to Ciudad de Victoria)

    22,130.345 Bulacan

    Sta. Rosa II-Camangyanan Road, Marilao,

    Bulacan (access road leading to Ciudad de

    Victoria)

    50,787.678 Bulacan

    Camangyanan Road, Sta. Maria, Bulacan

    (access road leading to Ciudad de Victoria)

    26,533.641 Bulacan

    Camangyanan-Kaybitin Road, Sta. Maria,

    Bulacan (access road leading to Ciudad de

    Victoria)

    16,575.681 Bulacan

    Rehabilitation/Improvement of Mayantoc

    San Clemente Circumferential Road (access

    road leading to Kalaw National Park and

    Timangguyob)

    114,470.000 Tarlac

  • P a g e | 32

    Name of Project Project Cost

    (P000)

    Location

    Concreting of Eco Park Downhill access

    road leading to Eco-Tourism Park

    78,205.000 Tarlac

    Asphalt Overlay of Tibag Eco Park Road and

    Construction of Lubigan Bridge (access road

    leading to Eco-Tourism Park and Monasterio

    de Tarlac)

    641,600.000 Tarlac

    Rehabilitation/Improvement of Cycling

    Circuit Road (access road leading to Mt.

    Ngile Picnic Ground)

    181,108.000 Tarlac

    Concreting of Road Network within Eco-

    Tourism Park

    24,840.000 Tarlac

    Concreting of LubiganBueno Access Road

    leading to Bueno Hot Spring

    277,640.000 Tarlac

    Construction of BuenoODonnel Rest.-

    Dapdap Road (access road leading to

    Bamban hills and cave)

    136,305.000 Tarlac

    DampaySalaza Road (access road leading to

    Mount Tapulao Eco-Tourism Project)

    78,205.000 Zambales

    Source: DPWH-RIII

  • P a g e | 33

    Implementation Program

    Table 5. Central Luzon Tourism Action Plan Matrix

    NTDP Strategic Direction 1:

    Developing and marketing competitive tourist destination and products

    Action Responsible/Participating

    Entity(ies)

    Time Frame

    Short

    Medium

    Long

    Product Development

    Organize Clusters of TDAs DOT, ATOCEL

    Rehabilitate/redevelop TDAs

    Conduct diagnostic assessment

    of sites

    Formulate local tourism

    area/site development

    plans/business plan

    LGUs, DENR, DOT, DTI, SBMA, CDC

    Implement site improvement LGUs, DOT, TIEZA

    Developing unique features,

    such as architecture,

    customs and traditions

    Enhancing the aesthetic

    character or environment/

    beautification

    Open space/ amusement or

    green park development

    Development of walk paths,

    local art or craft shops

    Providing areas or venues

    for sports or outdoor

    recreation

    Develop new market-competitive

    destinations and products

    Development of Subic for

    cruise tourism

    SBMA, DOT

    Develop facilities for large

    conventions in Clark and Subic

    SBMA, CDC, DOT

    Develop potential for

    entertainment/amusement,

    LGUs, DOT, DENR, DTI, SBMA, CDC,

    private sector

  • P a g e | 34

    sports, ecotourism, wellness,

    medical and retirement

    tourism

    Development of integrated

    resort

    Private Sector

    Establish TEZs and investment

    incentives

    TIEZA, LGUs

    Conduct Cultural Mapping LGUs, NHI

    Implement preservation and

    development of cultural and

    historical heritage

    LGUs, NHI, DOT

    Develop or improve

    accommodation and other service

    facilities

    DOT, private sector/associations of

    hotels, resorts and restaurants,

    LGUs

    Intensify promotion of tourism-

    local industry linkage

    DTI, DOT, private sector

    Marketing and Promotion

    Develop and promote a unified

    tourism brand

    LGUs, DOT, SBMA, CDC

    Determine target markets DOT, ATOCEL, CDC, SBMA *

    Mobilize various media to promote

    CLs attractions

    DOT, LGUs, CDC, SBMA *

    Harmonize marketing and

    promotion collaterals

    SBMA, CDC, LGUs, DOT

    Organize tour operators DOT, tour operators

    Develop tour packages Tour operators, SBMA, CDC

    Strengthen market research and

    database management

    Build DOTs market research

    database

    DOT

    Network with academic and

    other institutions

    DOT, academe, market research

    institutions *

  • P a g e | 35

    NTDP Strategic Direction 2:

    Improving tourism institutions, governance and human resource

    Action Responsible/Participating

    Entity(ies)

    Time Frame

    Short

    Medium

    Long

    Develop and implement a tourism

    enterprise accreditation system and

    standards

    DOT, LGUs, RDC

    Institutionalize/establish policies

    for regulating and monitoring

    tourism enterprises

    DOT, LGUs

    Streamline business permit and

    licensing system and reduce cost of

    doing business

    DTI, LGUs

    Institutionalize local tourism offices

    and build capacities of LGUs

    LGUs, DOT *

    Determine and establish an

    appropriate mechanism for

    facilitating tourism investment

    promotion[Investors Assistance

    Office (IAO)]

    RDC, DTI, SCAD

    Strengthen stakeholder

    partnerships

    DOT

    Strengthen DOTs capacity as

    coordinating and facilitating body

    DOT, TIEZA

    Mobilize public and private

    resource for tourism promotion

    and product development

    ATOCEL, LGUs, NGAs *

    Develop competent and productive

    tourism workforce

    LGUs, SBMA, CDC, DOT, TESDA *

    Intensify tourism security LGUs, PNP *

    Develop and implement programs

    for safeguarding vulnerable groups

    LGUs, DSWD

    Formulate and adopt local tourism

    codes

    LGUs

  • P a g e | 36

    NTDP Strategic Direction 3:

    Improving market access and connectivity

    Action Responsible/Participating

    Entity(ies)

    Time Frame

    Short

    Medium

    Long

    Organize tourist transport services

    and rationalize transport fares

    LTFRB, SBMA, CDC, CIAC, DOTC

    Study the possibility of alternative

    transport mode, in particular the

    revival of the port of Orion for

    Metro Manila and Central Luzon

    connection through the western

    seaboard

    DOTC, LGUs

    Identify and build priority tourism

    road infrastructure

    LGUs, DPWH, DOT,

    Build, install VICs, clean rest stops,

    directional signage

    DOT, TIEZA, DPWH

    Improve traffic management LGUs, DOTC *

    Note: * - continuing activity

    VI. Policy Recommendations

    Policies are needed to guide and set the basis for actions. Such are important to facilitate the

    implementation of the plan as well as in eliciting the cooperation and participation of all

    concerned stakeholders. The following policies are recommended for adoption especially at the

    local level (national policies are already in place):

    Support tourism industry development through provision of appropriate incentives,

    infrastructure and services.

    Ensure management and protection of the environment and natural resources in tourism

    development areas.

  • P a g e | 37

    Preservation and development of the tourism potential of historical and cultural heritage

    sites/assets for the perpetual enjoyment, education and appreciation of both local people

    and tourists.

    Ensure reasonable transport fares for locally-regulated public utility vehicles.

    Ensure ease of access through provision of road infrastructure and traffic management.

    In the rehabilitation or upgrading of tourism road infrastructure, preserving trees alongside

    roads to be rehabilitated is given premium to the extent that it is practicable, otherwise

    replacement of trees that have to be cut must be ensured.

    Ensure the accreditation of tourism establishments with the DOT and the maintenance of

    facilities, amenities and services within standards.

    Promote skills upgrading and licensing of tourism workers.

    Ensure that the local areas physical development should be in harmony with nature and its

    scenic attractions/ambiance.

    No signboards shall be installed in areas that would block, diminish or ruin the regions

    scenic views/landscapes.

    Provide for the protection of children, women, indigenous people and other vulnerable

    groups from the adverse social impacts of tourism.

    Ensure safety and security of tourists in TDAs at all times.

    VII. Implementation Arrangement

    As the task of tourism promotion and development encompasses broad range of activities and

    players from various fronts national government agencies, local governments, government

    corporations/authorities and private organizations coordination and integration of all said

    entities actions is therefore crucial to the successful accomplishment of our tourism goals.

    More important is the actual delivery or discharge of the tasks or roles of the network of

    stakeholders in the promotion of tourism. Delineation of the roles of the various sectors or

    institutions is important to provide clear guide for actions, and avoid duplication of functions

    and non-action.

  • P a g e | 38

    DOT: As the lead agency in the promotion of tourism development, the DOT shall be at the

    forefront of the RTAPs implementation. Primarily, DOTs role shall include the following:

    Oversee/coordinate the implementation of the CLTAP and report on progress to the

    RDC;

    Provide technical assistance to tourism stakeholders for the effective discharge of their

    roles or functions;

    Assist LGUs build their capacities for implementing activities supportive of the tourism

    action plan and the promotion of tourism in general;

    Provide direction or guidelines as may be necessary in the implementation of programs

    or activities relative to the Plan.

    RDC-SCT: As the body created to formulate the CLTAP, the Committee shall have the primary

    role of monitoring and assessing the Plans implementation; providing policy directions and

    recommendations that would help push for the attainment of the Plans objective; and ensure

    consistency of contribution to the overall regional development thrust and priorities.

    LGUs: Also at the forefront of tourism promotion and development, the LGUs shall take the

    following roles:

    Facilitate implementation of the plan at the local level through provision of the

    necessary mechanisms and systems;

    Provide for the environment conducive to tourism development in the area; and

    Promote the culture of tourism at the local level to help create a tourist-friendly

    environment and enhance the local areas tourism attraction.

    ATOCEL:

    Assist the DOT in ensuring the harmonious and coordinated implementation of the plan

    Provide technical assistance in the implementation of the Plan

    Ensure plan implementation at the local level

    Concerned RGAs/government offices:

    Support implementation of the RTAP through appropriate programs and budget

    Private Sector/Associations of Tourism Stakeholders:

    Ensure that activities are in line with and supportive of the objectives of the plan.

    Develop products in accordance with the Plan

  • P a g e | 39

    VIII. Monitoring and Evaluation

    The RDC-SCT through the RDC Secretariat shall conduct annual monitoring of the plan

    with the assistance of the DOT and ATOCEL. This is to keep track of the progress of the

    plan implementation, and to identify gaps that need to be addressed as well as to make

    adjustments in the plan as may be necessary.

    Evaluation of the plan and its implementation after the plan term shall be carried out to

    assess the plans effectiveness vis--vis the attainment of the plans objectives. This is to

    identify areas of strengths and weaknesses to serve as basis for the crafting of future

    interventions appropriate for raising the level of tourism in the region.