Cell signaling and receptors with resorcinols and flavonoids: redox, reactive oxygen species, and...

6
265 Introduction ere have been many reviews on physiological active phenols, mainly involving monophenols, catechols, and hydroquinones. However, the resorcinol class (1,3-dihy- droxybenzenes) has received less organized attention. e present review deals with resorcinols, such as resver- atrol (RVT) and flavonoids. e flavonoid class includes genistein, naringenin, flavopiridol, quercetin, and epigal- locatechin. In many cases, other phenolic types are also present. e focus is on cell signaling. e unifying theme includes physiological activity and toxicity. An important feature of these compounds is antioxidant (AO) action. It is interesting that they are also described as pro-oxi- dants. A recent review rationalized the dichotomy (1). In relation to AO action, the phenols behave as donors of electrons or hydrogen atoms. As pro-oxidants, oxidation yields catechols or hydroquinones, which are converted to electron transfer (ET) quinones. Subsequent redox cycling produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can result in beneficial effects or in toxicity. e multifac- eted approach provides insight. is review is the latest in our series involving cell sig- naling in various areas done in a multifaceted manner. e topics of resorcinols and flavonoids have not been previously examined from this perspective. Cell signaling, receptors, and physiological activity Starting more than a decade ago, proposals have been made concerning the fundamental aspect of cell signal- ing. e process is known to be importantly involved in various aspects of biological function, including normal processes, therapeutic drug action, and toxicology. A recent review has provided further insight (2). Evidence has accumulated that ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, and the hydroxyl radical, are important chemical mediators that regulate the transduction of sig- nals by modulating protein activity via redox chemistry. Authors have proposed that ROS have been conserved throughout evolution as universal second messengers. Nearly, every step in signal transfer is sensitive to ROS, which can function as second messengers in the activa- tion of transcription factors. In effect, cell signaling can be regarded as proceeding via a long redox chain in which the standard parameters of REVIEW ARTICLE Cell signaling and receptors with resorcinols and flavonoids: redox, reactive oxygen species, and physiological effects Peter Kovacic 1 and Ratnasamy Somanathan 2 1 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA and 2 Centro de Graduados e Investigación del Instituto Tecnológico de Tijuana, Tijuana, B.C. Mexico Abstract There have been appreciable numbers of reviews on monophenols, catechols, and hydroquinones. However, the resorcinol class has received less attention. This review deals with resorcinols and flavonoids. Emphasis is on cell signaling in addition to antioxidant (AO) properties and pro-oxidant effects. The apparent dichotomy is rationalized. There is extensive literature dealing with various aspects of cell signaling in addition to receptor involvement. The physiological responses are provided along with integration into the unifying mechanistic theme of electron transfer (ET)-reactive oxygen species (ROS)-oxidative stress (OS). The multifaceted approach involving redox processes and cell signaling is unique in providing novel insight. Keywords: Resorcinol, flavonoids, stilbenes, cell signaling, bioactivity Address for Correspondence: Peter Kovacic, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182- 1030, USA. Tel: (+619) 594-5595. Fax: (+619) 594-4634. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 24 February 2011; accepted 04 May 2011) Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction, 2011; 31(4): 265–270 © 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. ISSN 1079-9893 print/ISSN 1532-4281 online DOI: 10.3109/10799893.2011.586353 Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Monash University on 10/22/12 For personal use only.

Transcript of Cell signaling and receptors with resorcinols and flavonoids: redox, reactive oxygen species, and...

265

Introduction

There have been many reviews on physiological active phenols, mainly involving monophenols, catechols, and hydroquinones. However, the resorcinol class (1,3-dihy-droxybenzenes) has received less organized attention. The present review deals with resorcinols, such as resver-atrol (RVT) and flavonoids. The flavonoid class includes genistein, naringenin, flavopiridol, quercetin, and epigal-locatechin. In many cases, other phenolic types are also present. The focus is on cell signaling. The unifying theme includes physiological activity and toxicity. An important feature of these compounds is antioxidant (AO) action. It is interesting that they are also described as pro-oxi-dants. A recent review rationalized the dichotomy (1). In relation to AO action, the phenols behave as donors of electrons or hydrogen atoms. As pro-oxidants, oxidation yields catechols or hydroquinones, which are converted to electron transfer (ET) quinones. Subsequent redox cycling produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can result in beneficial effects or in toxicity. The multifac-eted approach provides insight.

This review is the latest in our series involving cell sig-naling in various areas done in a multifaceted manner.

The topics of resorcinols and flavonoids have not been previously examined from this perspective.

Cell signaling, receptors, and physiological activity

Starting more than a decade ago, proposals have been made concerning the fundamental aspect of cell signal-ing. The process is known to be importantly involved in various aspects of biological function, including normal processes, therapeutic drug action, and toxicology. A recent review has provided further insight (2). Evidence has accumulated that ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, and the hydroxyl radical, are important chemical mediators that regulate the transduction of sig-nals by modulating protein activity via redox chemistry. Authors have proposed that ROS have been conserved throughout evolution as universal second messengers. Nearly, every step in signal transfer is sensitive to ROS, which can function as second messengers in the activa-tion of transcription factors.

In effect, cell signaling can be regarded as proceeding via a long redox chain in which the standard parameters of

REVIEW ARTICLE

Cell signaling and receptors with resorcinols and flavonoids: redox, reactive oxygen species, and physiological effects

Peter Kovacic1 and Ratnasamy Somanathan2

1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA and 2Centro de Graduados e Investigación del Instituto Tecnológico de Tijuana, Tijuana, B.C. Mexico

AbstractThere have been appreciable numbers of reviews on monophenols, catechols, and hydroquinones. However, the resorcinol class has received less attention. This review deals with resorcinols and flavonoids. Emphasis is on cell signaling in addition to antioxidant (AO) properties and pro-oxidant effects. The apparent dichotomy is rationalized. There is extensive literature dealing with various aspects of cell signaling in addition to receptor involvement. The physiological responses are provided along with integration into the unifying mechanistic theme of electron transfer (ET)-reactive oxygen species (ROS)-oxidative stress (OS). The multifaceted approach involving redox processes and cell signaling is unique in providing novel insight.Keywords: Resorcinol, flavonoids, stilbenes, cell signaling, bioactivity

Address for Correspondence: Peter Kovacic, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-1030, USA. Tel: (+619) 594-5595. Fax: (+619) 594-4634. E-mail: [email protected]

(Received 24 February 2011; accepted 04 May 2011)

Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction, 2011; 31(4): 265–270© 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.ISSN 1079-9893 print/ISSN 1532-4281 onlineDOI: 10.3109/10799893.2011.586353

Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction

2011

31

4

265

270

24 February 2011

00 00 0000

04 May 2011

1079-9893

1532-4281

© 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

10.3109/10799893.2011.586353

LRST

586353

Jour

nal o

f R

ecep

tors

and

Sig

nal T

rans

duct

ion

Dow

nloa

ded

from

info

rmah

ealth

care

.com

by

Mon

ash

Uni

vers

ity o

n 10

/22/

12Fo

r pe

rson

al u

se o

nly.

266 P. Kovacic and R. Somanathan

Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction

initiation, propagation, and termination pertain, involv-ing omnipresent conduit species with unshared elec-trons. A series of relay stations may be operative. The numerous redox moieties in anchored proteins might fall in the relay category. There has been dramatic increase in attention devoted to free radical species in cell signaling, although the bulk of the signal transduction literature pays no attention to this.

Flavonoids (general)Many studies are accumulating that report the neu-roprotective, cardioprotective, and chemopreventive actions of dietary flavonoids (3). Although a major focus has been on the AO properties, there is an emerging view that flavonoids, and their in vivo metabolites, do not act only as conventional hydrogen-donating AOs, but may also exert modulatory actions in cells through actions at protein kinase and lipid kinase signaling pathways. Inhibitory or stimulatory actions at these pathways are likely to affect cellular function profoundly by altering the phosphorylation state of target molecules and by modulating gene expression. A clear understanding of the mechanisms of action of flavonoids, either as AOs or as modulators of cell signaling, and the influence of their metabolism on these properties are key to the evaluation of these potent biomolecules as anticancer agents, cardioprotectants, and inhibitors of neurode-generation. These views could also apply to other resor-cinols that exhibit AO actions.

Nutritional flavonoids modulate estrogen recep-tor signaling (4). Results indicate that flavonoids act on ERα transcriptional activity, whereas they impair the activation of rapid signaling pathways. The result-ing decoupling of ERα signal transduction could be a new mechanism in the protective effects of flavonoids against cancer. Inhibition of a receptor by red wine flavonoids provides a molecular explanation for the “French paradox” (5). Red wine abrogates the ligand-induced recruitment of signaling molecules and the activation of downstream events. Flavones suppress receptor signaling by down-regulating the expression of the common gamma chain (6). Flavonoids acti-vate receptor-mediated gene expression by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases in liver carcinoma cells (7). Skin cancer chemopreventive effects of the flavonoid silymarin are mediated via impairment of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and perturbation in cell-cycle progression (8). The effects of flavonones were exam-ined on suppressing the expression of the high-affinity receptor, which plays a central role in the allergic response (9). Studies have demonstrated that certain

flavonoids inhibit platelet function through several mechanisms, including antagonism of a membrane receptor in these cells (10).

ResveratrolResults suggest that multiple signaling pathways may underlie the apoptotic death of glioma induced by RVT (Figure 1) (11). Down-regulation of signaling pathways may be an important mediator in RVT-induced apopto-sis in these cells (12). Resveratrol may exert a protective effect on damage to heart muscle through modulating of the AMPK signaling pathway (13) and modulates tumor cell proliferation and protein translation via SIRT1-dependent AMPK activation (14). A study also showed that RVT inhibits PDGF receptor mitogenic signaling in mesangial cells (15). The phenol protects cells from AA + iron-induced ROS production and mitochondrial dysfunction through AMPK-mediated inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3β downstream of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-LKB1 pathway (16). The growth-inhibitory effects of RVT are mediated through cell-cycle arrest, up-regulation, down-regulation, and activation of caspases (17). Resveratrol has been shown to suppress the activation of several transcription fac-tors, to inhibit protein kinases and casein kinase II, and down-regulate products of genes. Resveratrol causes phosphorylation via ATM kinase pathway as a central mechanism for DNA damage (18). The phenol resulted in generation of ROS, subsequent drop in mitochon-drial membrane potential, followed by activation of caspase-3 and caspase-9 and induction of apoptosis (19). In a similar study, RVT was shown to induce acti-vation of caspase-3 and to increase the cleavage of the downstream caspase substrate, poly(ADP-ribose) poly-merase (11). Resveratrol-induced DNA fragmentation can be completely blocked by either a general caspase inhibitor or a selective caspase inhibitor. In a recent study, it was shown that RVT regulates oxidative stress (OS) and mitochondrial AOs in neuronal cells and also activates nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling (20). The compound also triggers signaling-dependent

Abbreviations:AO, antioxidant; ET, electron transfer; ROS, reactive oxygen species;

OS, oxidative stress; RVT, resveratrol; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate

HO

HO

OH

Figure 1. Resveratrol.

Jour

nal o

f R

ecep

tors

and

Sig

nal T

rans

duct

ion

Dow

nloa

ded

from

info

rmah

ealth

care

.com

by

Mon

ash

Uni

vers

ity o

n 10

/22/

12Fo

r pe

rson

al u

se o

nly.

Cell signaling and receptors with resorcinols and flavonoids 267

© 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

apoptosis in human tumor cells (21). A similar study showed RVT-induced apoptosis is associated with Fas redistribution and the formation of a death-inducing signaling complex on colon cancer cells (22). In a review, particular attention was given to antagonists and agonists of the Ah-receptor, including various fla-vonoids and RVT (23).

GenisteinGenistein (Figure 2) has been shown to inhibit cell growth and to induce apoptosis in a wide variety of cancer cell lines (24). These cells exhibited a decrease in Akt protein levels and subsequent down-regulation of Akt activity (Akt phosphorylation). Furthermore, genistein treatment induced mitochondrial membrane potential change, caspase-3 activation, and PARP cleavage. Inhibition of Akt signaling pathway and induction of apoptosis by genistein could be used as a new treatment modality for the prevention and/or treatment of malignancies. The phenol inhibits the growth of PC3 prostate cancer cells and induces apoptosis by inhibiting NF-κB and Akt sig-naling pathways (25). Genistein acts by modulating the cellular distribution of actin-binding proteins in associa-tion with alterations of cellular signal transduction path-ways in human stromal cell proliferation (26). A similar study showed inhibition of Akt and NF-κB activity and their cross-talk provide a novel mechanism by which genistein inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic processes in tumorigenic prostate epithelial cells (27). Genistein may be a natural antidiabetic agent by directly modulating pancreatic β-cell function via activation of the cAMP/PKA-dependent ERK1/2 signaling pathway (28). An article reviews studies regarding the effects of natural chemopreventive agents, such as isoflavones and EGCG, on cancer-related cell signaling pathways and provides comprehensive knowledge of the biologi-cal and molecular roles of chemopreventive agents in cancer cells (29). Results suggest that cell signaling and regulators of cell cycle are potential epigenetic molecular targets for prostate cancer prevention by dietary agents, for example, genistein and EGCG, against human pros-tate cancer (30).

NaringeninNaringenin (Figure 3) inhibits allergen-induced airway inflammation and inhibits NF-κB activity in a murine model of asthma (31). Data demonstrate that naringenin can exert antifibrogenic effects by directly or indirectly

down-regulating protein expression and phosphoryla-tion through transforming growth factor-1 signaling (32). Data suggest that naringenin inhibits β-catenin/Tcf signaling in gastric cancer with unknown mechanisms (33). Naringenin inhibits apolipoprotein B secretion through activation of both P13-K and MAPK signaling (34). The phenol suppresses cell growth and migration via alternative signaling pathways (35). Results indicate a potential modulation of bacterial cell–cell communi-cation by flavonoids, especially naringenin, quercetin, sinestin, and apigenin (36). Among the tested flavonoids, naringenin emerged as potent and possibly a nonspecific inhibitor of autoinducer-mediated cell–cell signaling. Mechanisms of naringenin-induced apoptotic cascade in cancer cells and involvement of estrogen receptor α and β signaling were reported (37). Naringenin improves insulin signaling and sensitivity and thereby promotes the cellular actions of insulin (38). The compound sig-nificantly reduces lung metastases in mice with pulmo-nary fibrosis and increases their survival by improving the immunosuppressive environment through down-regulating transforming growth factor-β1 and reducing regulatory T cells (39). Naringenin derivatives differently regulate apoptosis of cells via intracellular ROS produc-tion coupled with the concomitant activation of the caspase cascade signaling pathway, thereby implying that hydroxylation may be critical for the apoptosis-inducing activity of flavonoids (40). Results suggest that naringenin may produce an anti-inflammatory effect in stimulated glial cells that may be due to its interaction with p38 signaling cascades and the STAT-1 transcription factor (41). Hesperetin and naringenin prevent tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) from down-regulating the transcription of two anti-lipolytic genes. These effects are mediated through the inhibition of the ERK pathway (42). Naringenin impaired estrogen receptor (ER) α sig-naling by interfering with ER-mediated activation of ERK and phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathways (43). Co-exposure to naringenin, the ligand for ER, specifically antagonizes rapid signals by reducing the effect of the endogenous hormone in promoting cellular prolifera-tion (44).

QuercetinQuercetin (Figure 4) decreases the survival of prostate cancer cells by modulating the expression of insulin-like

HO

OH

O

OOH

Figure 2. Genistein.

HO

OH

O

O

OH

Figure 3. Naringenin.

Jour

nal o

f R

ecep

tors

and

Sig

nal T

rans

duct

ion

Dow

nloa

ded

from

info

rmah

ealth

care

.com

by

Mon

ash

Uni

vers

ity o

n 10

/22/

12Fo

r pe

rson

al u

se o

nly.

268 P. Kovacic and R. Somanathan

Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction

growth factors system components, signaling molecules and induces apoptosis (45). Quercetin induces apoptosis via AMPK activation and p53-dependent apoptotic cell death and it may be a chemopreventive or therapeutic agent against colon cancer (46). Quercetin may induce neuronal death via a mechanism involving inhibition of neuronal survival signaling through the inhibition of both Akt/PKB and ERK (47). Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase is an integral part of quercetin-induced growth inhibition in colorectal cells (48).

FlavopiridolFlavopiridol (Figure 5) inhibits phosphokinases (49). Its activity is strongest on cyclin-dependent kinases and less on receptor tyrosine kinases, receptor associates tyrosine kinases and on signal-transducing kinases. The cytotoxic activity of flavopiridol is not limited to cycling calls. Resting cells are also killed. Results show for the first time that flavopiridol modulates specific cellular signal transduc-tion pathways in B-CLL cells, thereby altering the balance between survival and cell death signals and providing rationale for the p53 independent nature of flavopiridol-induced apoptosis (50). Further work is required to identify whether combinations of conventional chemotherapeutic drugs and novel agents like flavopiridol can be used to improve patient outcomes in the treatment of B-CLL. Flavopiridol has pleiotropic effects on key targets involved with survival of dormant breast cancer cells and may rep-resent a useful approach to eliminating cells dependent on multiple signal pathways for survival (51). Results clearly suggest that the phenol interferes with TNF cell signaling pathway, leading to suppression of anti-apoptotic mecha-nism and enhancement of apoptosis in tumor cells (52). Flavopiridol and trastuzumab synergistically inhibit prolif-eration of breast cancer cells (53). There is association with selective cooperative inhibition of cyclin D1-dependent kinase and Akt signaling pathways.

Epigallocatechin gallateEpigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) (Figure 6) induces apoptosis by activating caspase-3/caspase-7 and inhibit-ing the expression of Bcl-2 and survinin, suggesting the blockade of signaling involved in early metastasis (54). Quercetin synergizes with EGCG in inhibiting the self-

renewal properties of cancer stem cells CSCs, inducing apoptosis, and blocking CSCs migration and invasion. Catechin, a constituent of tea, possesses bioactivities. In particular, the most abundant catechin in tea is EGCG, which has an anti-inflammatory effect (55). Production of interleukin-6 and RANKL was suppressed in the osteo-blasts treated with EGCG, which indicated an inflamma-tion suppression effect in osteomyelitis treatment. EGCG has been shown to modulate multiple signal transduction pathways in a fashion that controls the unwanted prolif-eration of cells, thereby imparting strong cancer chemo-preventive as well as therapeutic effects (56). A review discusses the modulations of important signaling events by the phenol and their implications in cancer manage-ment. Cell signaling pathways in the neuroprotective actions of EGCG were examined, with implications for neurodegenerative diseases (57). EGCG regulates T-cell receptor signaling in leukemia through the inhibition of ZAP-70 kinase (58). EGCG acts to selectively inhibit epi-dermal growth factor-dependent kinases to inhibit cell proliferation (59). Studies reveal the possible benefits of green tea polyphenols as cancer therapeutic agents to inhibit Met signaling and potentially block invasive cancer growth (60). A report deals with suppression of

OHO

OH

OH

O

OH

OH

Figure 4. Quercertin.

O

Cl

N

HO

HO

OH

CH3

O

7

Figure 5. Flavopiridol.

OHO

OH

OH

OH

OH

OH

Figure 6. Epigallocatechin.

Jour

nal o

f R

ecep

tors

and

Sig

nal T

rans

duct

ion

Dow

nloa

ded

from

info

rmah

ealth

care

.com

by

Mon

ash

Uni

vers

ity o

n 10

/22/

12Fo

r pe

rson

al u

se o

nly.

Cell signaling and receptors with resorcinols and flavonoids 269

© 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.

androgen receptor signaling and prostate-specific anti-gen expression by EGCG in different progression stages of prostate cancer cells (61). The phenol inhibits cell signal-ing by inducing gene expression (62). A report deals with the effects of EGCG on epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways, gene expression, and chemosensitiv-ity in human carcinoma cells (63).

Acknowledgement

Editorial assistance by Thelma Chavez is acknowledged.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References1. Kovacic P, Somanathan R. Resorcinols, related flavonoids and

stilbene phenols (antioxidant and prooxidant): redox, reactive oxygen species and physiological effects in Systems Biology of Free Radicals and Antioxidants, Laher I, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2011, in press.

2. Kovacic P, Pozos RS. Cell signaling (mechanism and reproductive toxicity): redox chains, radicals, electrons, relays, conduit, electrochemistry, and other medical implications. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2006, 78, 333–344.

3. Williams RJ, Spencer JP, Rice-Evans C. Flavonoids: antioxidants or signalling molecules? Free Radic Biol Med 2004, 36, 838–849.

4. Virgili F, Acconcia F, Ambra R, Rinna A, Totta P, Marino M. Nutritional flavonoids modulate estrogen receptor alpha signaling. IUBMB Life 2004, 56, 145–151.

5. Rosenkranz S, Knirel D, Dietrich H, Flesch M, Erdmann E, Böhm M. Inhibition of the PDGF receptor by red wine flavonoids provides a molecular explanation for the “French paradox.” FASEB J 2002, 16, 1958–1960.

6. Yamashita S, Yamashita T, Yamada K, Tachibana H. Flavones suppress type I IL-4 receptor signaling by down-regulating the expression of common gamma chain. FEBS Lett 2010, 584, 775–779.

7. Dong H, Lin W, Wu J, Chen T. Flavonoids activate pregnane x receptor-mediated CYP3A4 gene expression by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases in HepG2 liver carcinoma cells. BMC Biochem 2010, 11, 23.

8. Ahmad N, Gali H, Javed S, Agarwal R. Skin cancer chemopreventive effects of a flavonoid antioxidant silymarin are mediated via impairment of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling and perturbation in cell cycle progression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998, 247, 294–301.

9. Yano S, Tachibana H, Yamada K. Flavones suppress the expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor FcepsilonRI in human basophilic KU812 cells. J Agric Food Chem 2005, 53, 1812–1817.

10. Navarro-Núñez L, Castillo J, Lozano ML, Martínez C, Benavente-García O, Vicente V, Rivera J. Thromboxane A2 receptor antagonism by flavonoids: structure–activity relationships. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57, 1589–1594.

11. Jiang H, Zhang L, Kuo J, Kuo K, Gautam SC, Groc L, Rodriguez AI, Koubi D, Hunter TJ, Corcoran GB, Seidman MD, Levine RA. Resveratrol-induced apoptotic death in human U251 glioma cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2005, 4, 554–561.

12. Jiang H, Shang X, Wu H, Gautam SC, Al-Holou S, Li C, Kuo J, Zhang L, Chopp M. Resveratrol downregulates PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathways in human U251 glioma cells. J Exp Ther Oncol 2009, 8, 25–33.

13. Hwang JT, Kwon DY, Park OJ, Kim MS. Resveratrol protects ROS-induced cell death by activating AMPK in H9c2 cardiac muscle cells. Genes Nutr 2008, 2, 323–326.

14. Lin JN, Lin VC, Rau KM, Shieh PC, Kuo DH, Shieh JC, Chen WJ, Tsai SC, Way TD. Resveratrol modulates tumor cell proliferation and protein translation via SIRT1-dependent AMPK activation. J Agric Food Chem 2010, 58, 1584–1592.

15. Venkatesan B, Ghosh-Choudhury N, Das F, Mahimainathan L, Kamat A, Kasinath BS, Abboud HE, Choudhury GG. Resveratrol inhibits PDGF receptor mitogenic signaling in mesangial cells: role of PTP1B. FASEB J 2008, 22, 3469–3482.

16. Shin SM, Cho IJ, Kim SG. Resveratrol protects mitochondria against oxidative stress through AMP-activated protein kinase-mediated glycogen synthase kinase-3beta inhibition downstream of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-LKB1 pathway. Mol Pharmacol 2009, 76, 884–895.

17. Aggarwal BB, Bhardwaj A, Aggarwal RS, Seeram NP, Shishodia S, Takada Y. Role of resveratrol in prevention and therapy of cancer: preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer Res 2004, 24, 2783–2840.

18. Tyagi A, Singh RP, Agarwal C, Siriwardana S, Sclafani RA, Agarwal R. Resveratrol causes Cdc2-tyr15 phosphorylation via ATM/ATR-Chk1/2-Cdc25C pathway as a central mechanism for S phase arrest in human ovarian carcinoma Ovcar-3 cells. Carcinogenesis 2005, 26, 1978–1987.

19. Shanker S, Chen Q, Siddiqui I, Sarva K, Srivastava R. Sensitization of TRAIL-resistant LNCaP cell by resveratrol (3,4′,5-tri-hydroxystilbene): molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. J Mol Signaling 2007, 2, 7.

20. Kairisalo M, Bonomo A, Hyrskyluoto A, Mudò G, Belluardo N, Korhonen L, Lindholm D. Resveratrol reduces oxidative stress and cell death and increases mitochondrial antioxidants and XIAP in PC6.3-cells. Neurosci Lett 2011, 488, 263–266.

21. Clément MV, Hirpara JL, Chawdhury SH, Pervaiz S. Chemopreventive agent resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes, triggers CD95 signaling-dependent apoptosis in human tumor cells. Blood 1998, 92, 996–1002.

22. Delmas D, Rébé C, Lacour S, Filomenko R, Athias A, Gambert P, Cherkaoui-Malki M, Jannin B, Dubrez-Daloz L, Latruffe N, Solary E. Resveratrol-induced apoptosis is associated with Fas redistribution in the rafts and the formation of a death-inducing signaling complex in colon cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2003, 278, 41482–41490.

23. Tutel’yan VA, Gapparov MM, Telegin LY, Devichenskii VM, Pevnitskii LA. Flavonoids and resveratrol as regulators of Ah-receptor activity: protection from dioxin toxicity. Bull Exp Biol Med 2003, 136, 533–539.

24. Park SS, Kim YN, Jeon YK, Kim YA, Kim JE, Kim H, Kim CW. Genistein-induced apoptosis via Akt signaling pathway in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2005, 56, 271–278.

25. Li Y, Sarkar FH. Gene expression profiles of genistein-treated PC3 prostate cancer cells. J Nutr 2002, 132, 3623–3631.

26. Shieh DB, Li RY, Liao JM, Chen GD, Liou YM. Effects of genistein on beta-catenin signaling and subcellular distribution of actin-binding proteins in human umbilical CD105-positive stromal cells. J Cell Physiol 2010, 223, 423–434.

27. Li Y, Sarkar FH. Inhibition of nuclear factor kappaB activation in PC3 cells by genistein is mediated via Akt signaling pathway. Clin Cancer Res 2002, 8, 2369–2377.

28. Fu Z, Zhang W, Zhen W, Lum H, Nadler J, Bassaganya-Riera J, Jia Z, Wang Y, Misra H, Liu D. Genistein induces pancreatic beta-cell proliferation through activation of multiple signaling pathways and prevents insulin-deficient diabetes in mice. Endocrinology 2010, 151, 3026–3037.

29. Sarkar FH, Li Y. Cell signaling pathways altered by natural chemopreventive agents. Mutat Res 2004, 555, 53–64.

30. Agarwal R. Cell signaling and regulators of cell cycle as molecular targets for prostate cancer prevention by dietary agents. Biochem Pharmacol 2000, 60, 1051–1059.

31. Shi Y, Dai J, Liu H, Li RR, Sun PL, Du Q, Pang LL, Chen Z, Yin KS. Naringenin inhibits allergen-induced airway inflammation and

Jour

nal o

f R

ecep

tors

and

Sig

nal T

rans

duct

ion

Dow

nloa

ded

from

info

rmah

ealth

care

.com

by

Mon

ash

Uni

vers

ity o

n 10

/22/

12Fo

r pe

rson

al u

se o

nly.

270 P. Kovacic and R. Somanathan

Journal of Receptors and Signal Transduction

airway responsiveness and inhibits NF-kappaB activity in a murine model of asthma. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2009, 87, 729–735.

32. Liu X, Wang W, Hu H, Tang N, Zhang C, Liang W, Wang M. Smad3 specific inhibitor, naringenin, decreases the expression of extracellular matrix induced by TGF-beta1 in cultured rat hepatic stellate cells. Pharm Res 2006, 23, 82–89.

33. Lee JH, Park CH, Jung KC, Rhee HS, Yang CH. Negative regulation of beta-catenin/Tcf signaling by naringenin in AGS gastric cancer cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005, 335, 771–776.

34. Allister EM, Mulvihill EE, Barrett PH, Edwards JY, Carter LP, Huff MW. Inhibition of apoB secretion from HepG2 cells by insulin is amplified by naringenin, independent of the insulin receptor. J Lipid Res 2008, 49, 2218–2229.

35. Misty R, Martinez R, Ali H, Steimle PA. Naringenin is a novel inhibitor of Dictyostelium cell proliferation and cell migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006, 345, 516–522.

36. Vikram A, Jayaprakasha GK, Jesudhasan PR, Pillai SD, Patil BS. Suppression of bacterial cell-cell signaling, biofilm formation and type III secretion system by citrus flavonoids. J Appl Microbiol 2010, 109, 512–527.

37. Totta P, Acconcia F, Leone S, Cardillo I, Marino M. Mechanisms of naringenin-induced apoptotic cascade in cancer cells: involvement of estrogen receptor alpha and beta signalling. IUBMB Life 2004, 56, 491–499.

38. Kannappan S, Anuradha CV. Naringenin enhances insulin-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation and improves the cellular actions of insulin in a dietary model of metabolic syndrome. Eur J Nutr 2010, 49, 101–109.

39. Du G, Jin L, Han X, Song Z, Zhang H, Liang W. Naringenin: a potential immunomodulator for inhibiting lung fibrosis and metastasis. Cancer Res 2009, 69, 3205–3212.

40. Lee ER, Kang YJ, Choi HY, Kang GH, Kim JH, Kim BW, Han YS, Nah SY, Paik HD, Park YS, Cho SG. Induction of apoptotic cell death by synthetic naringenin derivatives in human lung epithelial carcinoma A549 cells. Biol Pharm Bull 2007, 30, 2394–2398.

41. Vafeiadou K, Vauzour D, Lee HY, Rodriguez-Mateos A, Williams RJ, Spencer JP. The citrus flavanone naringenin inhibits inflammatory signalling in glial cells and protects against neuroinflammatory injury. Arch Biochem Biophys 2009, 484, 100–109.

42. Yoshida H, Takamura N, Shuto T, Ogata K, Tokunaga J, Kawai K, Kai H. The citrus flavonoids hesperetin and naringenin block the lipolytic actions of TNF-alpha in mouse adipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 394, 728–732.

43. Galluzzo P, Ascenzi P, Bulzomi P, Marino M. The nutritional flavanone naringenin triggers antiestrogenic effects by regulating estrogen receptor alpha-palmitoylation. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 2567–2575.

44. Bulzomi P, Bolli A, Galluzzo P, Leone S, Acconcia F, Marino M. Naringenin and 17beta-estradiol coadministration prevents hormone-induced human cancer cell growth. IUBMB Life 2010, 62, 51–60.

45. Senthilkumar K, Elumalai P, Arunkumar R, Banudevi S, Gunadharini ND, Sharmila G, Selvakumar K, Arunakaran J. Quercetin regulates insulin like growth factor signaling and induces intrinsic and extrinsic pathway mediated apoptosis in androgen independent prostate cancer cells (PC-3). Mol Cell Biochem 2010, 344, 173–184.

46. Kim HJ, Kim SK, Kim BS, Lee SH, Park YS, Park BK, Kim SJ, Kim J, Choi C, Kim JS, Cho SD, Jung JW, Roh KH, Kang KS, Jung JY. Apoptotic effect of quercetin on HT-29 colon cancer cells via the AMPK signaling pathway. J Agric Food Chem 2010, 58, 8643–8650.

47. Spencer JP, Rice-Evans C, Williams RJ. Modulation of pro-survival Akt/protein kinase B and ERK1/2 signaling cascades by quercetin and its in vivo metabolites underlie their action on neuronal viability. J Biol Chem 2003, 278, 34783–34793.

48. Richter M, Ebermann R, Marian B. Quercetin-induced apoptosis in colorectal tumor cells: possible role of EGF receptor signaling. Nutr Cancer 1999, 34, 88–99.

49. Sedlacek HH. Mechanisms of action of flavopiridol. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2001, 38, 139–170.

50. Pepper C, Thomas A, Fegan C, Hoy T, Bentley P. Flavopiridol induces apoptosis in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells through a p38 and ERK MAP kinase-dependent mechanism. Leuk Lymphoma 2003, 44, 337–342.

51. Najmi S, Korah R, Chandra R, Abdellatif M, Wieder R. Flavopiridol blocks integrin-mediated survival in dormant breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 2005, 11, 2038–2046.

52. Takada Y, Sethi G, Sung B, Aggarwal BB. Flavopiridol suppresses tumor necrosis factor-induced activation of activator protein-1, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p44/p42 MAPK, and Akt, inhibits expression of antiapoptotic gene products, and enhances apoptosis through cytochrome c release and caspase activation in human myeloid cells. Mol Pharmacol 2008, 73, 1549–1557.

53. Wu K, Wang C, D’Amico M, Lee RJ, Albanese C, Pestell RG, Mani S. Flavopiridol and trastuzumab synergistically inhibit proliferation of breast cancer cells: association with selective cooperative inhibition of cyclin D1-dependent kinase and Akt signaling pathways. Mol Cancer Ther 2002, 1, 695–706.

54. Tang S-N, Singh C, Nall D, Meeker D, Shanker S, Srivastava R. The dietary bioflavonoid quercetin synergizes with epigallocatechin gallate EGCG) to inhibit prostate cancer stem cell characteristics, invasion, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Mol Signaling 2010, 5.

55. Ishida I, Kohda C, Yanagawa Y, Miyaoka H, Shimamura T. Epigallocatechin gallate suppresses expression of receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) in Staphylococcus aureus infection in osteoblast-like NRG cells. J Med Microbiol 2007, 56, 1042–1046.

56. Khan N, Afaq F, Saleem M, Ahmad N, Mukhtar H. Targeting multiple signaling pathways by green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Cancer Res 2006, 66, 2500–2505.

57. Mandel S, Weinreb O, Amit T, Youdim MB. Cell signaling pathways in the neuroprotective actions of the green tea polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurochem 2004, 88, 1555–1569.

58. Shim JH, Choi HS, Pugliese A, Lee SY, Chae JI, Choi BY, Bode AM, Dong Z. (−)-Epigallocatechin gallate regulates CD3-mediated T cell receptor signaling in leukemia through the inhibition of ZAP-70 kinase. J Biol Chem 2008, 283, 28370–28379.

59. Sah JF, Balasubramanian S, Eckert RL, Rorke EA. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway. Evidence for direct inhibition of ERK1/2 and AKT kinases. J Biol Chem 2004, 279, 12755–12762.

60. Bigelow RLH, Caedelli JA. The green tea catechins, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and (−)-epicatechin-3-gallate (EGC), inhibit HGF/Met signaling in immortalized and tumorigenic breast epithelial cells. Oncogene 2006, 25, 1922–1930.

61. Chuu CP, Chen RY, Kokontis JM, Hiipakka RA, Liao S. Suppression of androgen receptor signaling and prostate specific antigen expression by (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in different progression stages of LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Cancer Lett 2009, 275, 86–92.

62. Ripley BJ, Fujimoto M, Serada S, Ohkawara T, Nishikawa T, Terabe F, Matsukawa Y, Stephanou A, Knight RA, Isenberg DA, Latchman DS, Kishimoto T, Naka T. Green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin gallate inhibits cell signaling by inducing SOCS1 gene expression. Int Immunol 2010, 22, 359–366.

63. Masuda M, Suzui M, Weinstein IB. Effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on growth, epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathways, gene expression, and chemosensitivity in human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7, 4220–4229.

Jour

nal o

f R

ecep

tors

and

Sig

nal T

rans

duct

ion

Dow

nloa

ded

from

info

rmah

ealth

care

.com

by

Mon

ash

Uni

vers

ity o

n 10

/22/

12Fo

r pe

rson

al u

se o

nly.