Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

14
Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm Proliferação não programada Instabilidade genômica 13 CDKs e 25 ciclinas mas nem todas contam cdks 4, 6, 2 (interfase) e cdk1 (cdc28 S. cerevisiae ou cdc2 S. pombe) ciclinas D, E, A, B Checkpoints bloqueiam ciclo (p16 Ink4 , p21 Cip , p17 Kip ) No ciclo: D1, D2, D3 / cdk4 cdk6 fosforilação RB, p130, p170 Permite expressão de E1,E2/cdk2 inativação pocket proteins – A2/cdk2 S, G2 – B/cdk1 (cdk1 é essencial) Todavia, demais cdks podem ser essenciais para tumores!!!

description

Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Proliferação não programada Instabilidade genômica 13 CDKs e 25 ciclinas mas nem todas contam cdks 4, 6, 2 (interfase) e cdk1 (cdc28 S. cerevisiae ou cdc2 S. pombe ) ciclinas D, E, A, B - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

Page 1: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

• Proliferação não programada• Instabilidade genômica• 13 CDKs e 25 ciclinas mas nem todas contam

– cdks 4, 6, 2 (interfase) e cdk1 (cdc28 S. cerevisiae ou cdc2 S. pombe)– ciclinas D, E, A, B

• Checkpoints bloqueiam ciclo (p16Ink4, p21Cip, p17Kip)

• No ciclo:– D1, D2, D3 / cdk4 cdk6 fosforilação RB, p130, p170– Permite expressão de E1,E2/cdk2 inativação pocket proteins– A2/cdk2 S, G2– B/cdk1 (cdk1 é essencial)– Todavia, demais cdks podem ser essenciais para tumores!!!

Page 2: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

However, the fact that CDK1 alone can drive the cell cycle in most mammalian cells suggest that the mammalian cell cycle is not conceptually too different from that of yeast

Page 3: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

Mice expressing all interphase CDKs but not CDK1 do not progress beyond the two-cell embryo stage. Mice expressing CDK1 but no interphase CDKs, progress up to mid gestation (embryonic day (E)12.5–E13.5). Mice lacking CDK4 and CDK6 develop until late embryonic development (E16.5–E17.5), whereas those lacking CDK4 and CDK2 die at birth. Finally, mice lacking CDK6 and CDK2 develop to adulthood and have a normal life span. Except for embryos lacking CDK1, none of the mutant embryos or mice display cell cycle defects except in those cell types indicated in the yellow boxes

Page 4: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm
Page 5: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

H. sapiens: only ten cyclins (three D-type, two E-type, two A-type and 3 B-type cyclins)are known to be directly involved in driving the mammalian cell cycle.

Page 6: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

why have eukaryotes evolved an increasing numberof CDKs? The most plausible explanation is that multicellularorganisms require additional levels of regulationto control proliferation of a wide repertoire of cell types.At least, some of these controls may involve phosphorylationof specific substrates in order to allow specializedcells to proceed through the cell cycle.

do tumourcells retain the same CDK

requirements as the normalcells from which they originate or do

they acquirespecific needs for CDK activity

during tumour development?

Deregulation ofCDK4 and CDK6 activities have been

implicated in a widevariety of tumours

Cdk4-null mice, unlike their wild typecounterparts, do not develop skin

tumours induced byMyc55.

Page 7: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

Briefly,they involve the sensor kinases ataxia–telangiectasiamutated (ATm) and ataxia–telangiectasia and rad3-related (ATr), and the checkpoint kinases CHK1 andCHK2. Activation of these pathways in response to DNAdamage results in increased levels of the CDK inhibitorp21 or inhibition of CDK activators such as the Cdc25phosphatases6. These mechanisms prevent G1/S or G2/mtransitions in the presence of DNA damage, mostly byinhibiting CDK activity.

mutations in DNA damage checkpoint

proteins predispose carriers to specific syndromes,

such as ataxia–telangiectasia (ATM mutations), Seckel

(ATR mutations) and li–Fraumeni (CHk2 mutations)

syndromes

Page 8: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

there is increasing evidencethat the catalytic activities of CDKs may have specificroles during DNA repair.

In humans, CDK1 andCDK2 phosphorylate the tumour

suppressor BrCA2 tomodulate its interaction with rAD51.

This interactionstimulates homologous

recombination-dependent repairduring S phase and G2

Page 9: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

Active CDK1–cyclin complexes phosphorylate more than 70 substratesduring G2 and early mitosis to trigger centrosome separation,Golgi dynamics, nuclear envelope breakdownand chromosome condensation, among other processes

Once chromosomes are condensed and aligned

at the metaphase plate, CDK1 activity is switched off to

allow sister chromatid separation through activation ofseparase (also known as separin)8, a protease that

cleavesthe cohesin subunit SCC1 (also known

as rAD21),eliminating chromatid cohesion.

Inactivation ofCDK1 is also required for chromosome

decondensation,re-formation of the nuclear envelope

and cytokinesis.

Page 10: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

Chromosome segregation is mediated by theanaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), anE3 ubiquitin ligase responsible for targeting mitotic cyclins,among other mitotic regulators, for degradation.

Cyclin B is an obligatorytarget for APC/C to switch off CDK1 activity duringanaphase. If CDK1 activity is recovered after chromosomesegregation, chromosomes re-condense and cellsare not able to exit from mitosis.

Centrosome amplification may lead to the formation of

aberrant mitotic spindles with multiple spindle poles that

result in abnormal cell divisions and aneuploid

Page 11: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

In the presence ofunaligned chromosomes, separase is kept inactive by securin and CDK1–cyclin B. Under these conditions, sisterchromatids are held together by cohesins. After complete bipolar attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic spindle,cyclin B and securin are also ubiquitylated by APC/C–CDC20, but in a SAC-dependent manner. Ubiquitin-dependentdegradation of these proteins inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) leading to the activation of separase, which inturn cleaves cohesins and releases sister chromatids, hence facilitating the metaphase-to-anaphase transition.APC/C–CDH1 also targets cyclin A and cyclin B

Page 12: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm
Page 13: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm

As discussed above,mouse tumour models have illustrated that ablation ofcyclin D1 (and hence CDK4 activity) prevents breastcancer when driven by Erbb2 and Hras oncogenes, butnot those dependent on Myc- or Wnt1-driven pathways59.moreover, CDK4 inhibition may be effective to preventMyc-induced skin tumours

These observations raise

the possibilitythat different

tumour types, depending on their

pathogenicspectrum of

mutations, may display different

sensitivityto CDK inhibition.

This concept should be taken

into consideration when evaluating

the new generationof CDK inhibitors

currently undergoing clinical

trials

Page 14: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm