Small Community CDM projects IDFC experience and perspectives Ajay Narayanan Head EMSD/DINT IDFC.
CDM 2015: The regulator’s experience to date - … Regulator's experience... · Health and Safety...
Transcript of CDM 2015: The regulator’s experience to date - … Regulator's experience... · Health and Safety...
Health and Safety Executive
Health and Safety Executive
CDM 2015: The regulator’s
experience to date
Simon Longbottom
Head of Construction Sector, HSE
What is CDM 2015(16) about?
CDM applies to all
construction work
• requirements for managing risk on
construction PROJECTS
• standards to be achieved BUT
NOT how to achieve them
• a flexible framework
• compliance strategies will vary
dependant on the project risk
profile
A project is more than a
construction site
Philosophy and objectives
• Integrate health and safety into project management
– Risk management not an after-thought or
bolt-on extra
– Improve communication and co-ordination
• Encourage all involved to work together to:
– Plan and manage from the outset, identify
hazards early on
– Target effort where it can do most good
– Discourage unnecessary bureaucracy
• Benefits:
– Reduced delays
– Improved reliability of costings and
completion targets
– Improved quality of the finished product
CDM 2015 – philosophy and objectives
• Effort on planning and management should be in proportion to project risk and complexity
• Associated paperwork should help communicate and manage the risk
• Paperwork which adds little is a WASTE OF EFFORT and a distraction from real risk management
CDM 2015
Pre construction phase Construction PhaseLiaison phase
Principal Designer
Principal Contractor
CDM
InformationH&S FileConstruction Phase Plan
Pre construction information
BIM
Common
Data
Environment
Concept
Stage
Options
Models
show mass
Site
evaluation
Risk
analysis
Design
3D Models
Methods of
construction
Liaison with
contractors
Site logistics
Define end
user needs
Detailed design
Clash detection
4D Models
Constructability
Using models to
communicate
Risk mitigation
Handover
H&S File
Maintenance info
Information to
inform ongoing
risk assessment
Construction
Information on
risk informs CPP
Visual method
statements
Application uncertainty
• Term maintenance activities:
– Tap washers
– Door handles
– Tree cutting/planting
– Power washing steps
– Painting an internal wall
– Light bulbs
• Definition has not changed
– FAQ and Q&A
• Part of wider project on site?
• Existing arrangements to plan, manage, monitor?
• Remember, be proportionate
The commercial client
• Decides what will be constructed
• Commissions the design
contractors
• Initiates the construction work
(or pulls the plug!)
• Is at the head of the
procurement chain
• Makes appointments, eg
Principal Designer and Principal
Contractor
• Greatest influence as standard-setter
The Client role – strengthened in CDM 2015(16)
• Make suitable arrangements for managing
a project including the
allocation of sufficient time
and other resources to:
1) ensure H&S and
2) welfare facilities
provided
• Maintain and review these
arrangements
Domestic clients
• Duties deemed to
contractor or PC
• Duties can be taken
on by designer or
PD where the client
wishes
• No PC? – enforce
against duty holder
creating risk
The Principal Designer
• Born out of necessity
• CDM-C role was not
working
• The PD Should– Strengthen design risk
management and co-operation
– Mirror the PC role in achieving
co-ordination
– Ensure information flow
PD role – what do we want industry to achieve?
• Designers taking responsibility for coordination and information flows, and health and safety
– Mirror role to the Principal Contractor
– Ability to influence the Client and PC
– More strategic approach on a project
– Proctively eliminating and mitigating risks
– An integral part of design – not separate
• Added value
– Reduced number of dutyholders
• Change accountability
– No delegation of H&S to consultant
– Remove the non-notifiable behaviours
Where we don’t want to be – some early behaviours
• Reluctance to take on the PD role when appropriate
• Additional fees for unnecessary work in the integrated design process
• Perception CDM stifles creativity
• Disproportionate and ineffective risk controls; increased bureaucracy
• Limited understanding of risk management/control hierarchy
• Unnecessary use/creation of third party ‘industry’ – no statutory ‘CDM advisor’ role
PD role – what has been the impact
so far?• Designer definition in CDM is wide
ranging
• Design community unsure of the role
(ex-CDM-C’s & Insurance)
• Active vs Non-Active Designers (ex-
CDM-C’s) – same criteria as PC role
PD role – industry needs to focus on?
Encourage & Build
Confidence
Case Studies
Skills, Knowledge & Training
Guidance
Support
None currently
Training
started i.e.
Consultants
Forum, RIBA,
ICEIndustry
guidance
Ex-CDMC’s
supporting
rather than
taking on PD
Who can be a PD?
• Must be a designer with
relevant SKE
• In control of pre-
construction phase
• Organisation or individual
– often a team
• ‘Designer’ includes
anyone who
prepares/modifies
designs or
arranges/instructs others
to do so
CDM 2015 – Corporate competence
• Selection of supply chain
with relevant experience
and organisational
capability – due diligence
• Ongoing industry reform
of PAS 91 to provide a
risk-based assurance
system
• Remove non-value
adding activities
CDM 2015 – competence
Individual competence
• Ensuring appropriate skills, knowledge training, experience have been or are being obtained.
• Ongoing information, instruction and training to ensure site risks are controlled,
• Supplemented by appropriate supervision
• Professional bodies and role of CPD