CCSSO ILN Learning Progression Pilot OGAP – ETS CBAL ... · (Adding it Up! (2001) National...
Transcript of CCSSO ILN Learning Progression Pilot OGAP – ETS CBAL ... · (Adding it Up! (2001) National...
1
CCSSO ILN Learning Progression Pilot
OGAP – ETS CBAL Madison County Schools, KY
Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP) and
Educational Testing Service (ETS)
It started here… 1989 2
Flanders, J. (Winter, 1989), UCSMP Newsletter
CCSSM – Focus and Coherence 3
Grades k-5: Focused on developing conceptual and procedural fluency as well as algebraic thinking.
Middle school topics assume conceptual and procedural fluency with whole numbers and fractions.
Then..
Now..
It is one thing to make these changes and another to accomplish this goal …
4
How the partnership was designed to help support the goal…
5
Elementary feeder schools to middle school Focus on foundational mathematics at the elementary
school that will support the development of middle school topics.
Mathematics education research about how students
learn specific mathematics topics – learning progressions.
Tools, resources, and strategies for gathering evidence of student learning and focusing instructional decision making.
Strategies that engage students in their own learning.
Big Ideas of the project… 6 Algebra,
Advanced Mathematics, and Real Life
Proportional Reasoning
Fractions Multiplicative Reasoning
Additive Reasoning
M A R G E P E T I T C O N S U L T I N G , M P C B O B L A I R D , U N I V E R S I T Y O F V E R M O N T
B E T H H U L B E R T , B A R R E C I T Y A N D T O W N S C H O O L S . V E R M O N T
7
The Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP) A learning progression in practice
2003-2013
Developed as a part of the Vermont Mathematics Partnership Ongoing Assessment Project (OGAP) funded by NSF EHR-0227057 and the US DOE (S366A20002).
Implementation Sites Research Partners
Alabama Kentucky Michigan Nebraska New Hampshire Ohio Vermont
The Consortium for Policy Research in Education (CPRE) Teachers College University of Pennsylvania
8
OGAP
Take Aways! 9
Teacher knowledge about the research/learning progressions is fundamental – this involves a real commitment to PD, NOT just creating tools and materials, but substantive professional development
The right school conditions are key!
Tools should:
a) Reflect the bidirectional nature of learning progressions b) Reflect developing understanding, common errors, and
preconceptions or misconceptions that may interfere with learning new concepts solving related problems
c) Be at a grain size that is manageable and useable by both teachers and students
OGAP ILN Implementation Model - Conditions 10
Extensive up-front professional development by OGAP Team (3 - 4 days)
All grade span teachers, special educators, and math interventionists
District/school Coaches
Ongoing Support
By OGAP team – monthly PD sessions and ongoing virtual support
By school/district coaches in bi-weekly PLCs
Implementation of OGAP System
• Knowledge of formative assessment and learning progressions
• Related content knowledge • Related math education research • Use of OGAP Framework/learning
progression • Use of other OGAP tools and
resources (e.g., item banks, evidence collection tools)
• Link to CCSS
Administration agrees to support full system.
OGAP Underlying Principles 11
Principle # 1: Build on pre-existing knowledge (How People Learn (2000) National Research Council)
Principle # 2: Learn (and assess) for Understanding (Adding it Up! (2001) National Research Council)
Principle # 3: Use Frequent Formative Assessment (Inside the Black Box, (2001) Black, P, and Wiliam, D.)
Principle # 4: Build Assessment on Mathematics Education Research (Knowing What Students Know (2001) National Research Council)
OGAP is a systematic and intentional formative assessment system in mathematics.
12
• Gathering information about pre-existing knowledge through the use of a pre-assessment;
• Analyzing pre-assessment to guide unit planning; and
• A continuous and intentional system of instructing, probing with instructionally embedded questions, analysis, and instructional modification
Grades 2 - 8
•Fractions
•Multiplicative reasoning
•Proportionality
Supported by:
•Professional development
• Tools and resources
•Learning progressions
13
It is not formative assessment alone OR knowledge of cognitive research alone…
…but the marriage of the two that empowers teachers
OGAP Frameworks/Learning Progressions marriage of research and practice
14
15
15 Problem
Situations Strategies
Grade 2 Equal groups Repeated addition with an array
Grade 3 (factors within 100)
Equal groups, arrays, equal measures, beginning area
Properties of operations, drawings, equations
Grade 4 (1 digit x 4 digit, and 2 digit x 2 digit)
Multiplicative comparison, measurement conversion within systems, area
Place value and properties… using equations, rectangular arrays, and/or area model, equations
Grade 5 (fluently)
Scaling (multiplicative change), area, volume, patterns, conversions between systems
Standard algorithm, equations
CCSS Whole Number Multiplication Link to the OGAP Framework
16 16
How many wheels do 29 tricycles have?
One tricycle has three wheels.
Write an equation to match this picture. How many smiley faces are there?
Farmer Brown donated 7 dozen eggs to the senior center. How many eggs did he donate?
There are 16 players on a team in the Smithville Soccer League. How many players are in the league if there are 12 teams?
1990-2000s
NOW
Wow – look at all the ways students
can solve the problem
What do these different solutions
mean? What do I do now?
Teachers are ready!
Tools and strategies manageable 17
Analyzing student work – the OGAP Sort
18
Ipad eTool in development 19
Some Survey Comments 20
I can't begin to tell you how OGAP has affected my work. It was the best training I have received to date on how to actually teach multiplication. It was so eye opening. I felt validated that I had been doing some things good, but the progression chart, the open area model, and other tweaks to my instruction made a huge difference in my students' learning.
At one point I was not sure how to adequately implement OGAP as much as I wanted to in my instruction. Through the guidance of my PLC, we developed a plan for me to consistently use the bank of questions and then use results from those questions to further guide my instruction. I was able to literally watch my students move throughout the learning progressions
To what degree has the OGAP Multiplicative training and use of OGAP Framework/Learning Progression affected your understanding of…
21
72% 66%
80% 78%
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Evidenceinstudent work
Instructionaldecision making
Math Educationresearch
Content
Frequently and Consistently (n= 47)
22
PLC Focus
70%
85%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Met 2 or more times a month Focused on evidence in student workand eduational decsiion making
OGAP PLCs (n= 47)
Expansion in New Hampshire 23
NH - September 2013 Reinforcement for Cohort I multiplicative reasoning focused on evidence in student work and instructional decision making.
Nashua, NH fully implementing multiplicative, fractions, and proportionality to all teachers and schools in district over 3 years.
NH – expanding to 2 new districts.
24
An Example of OGAP Professional Development Structure