第四章 研究結果與發現 -...

105
58 第四章 研究結果與發現 本章分為三部分,第一節主要以內容分析之量化資料探討 2005 年縣市長、 縣市議員網站之呈現情形;第二節與第三節融入訪談資料,針對台北縣長參選人 周錫瑋與羅文嘉雙方網站、部落格以集中式個案探討,比較雙方內容呈現與經營 之方。 第一節 統計檢驗 第一節以量化統計方式分析 2005 年縣市長候選人、縣市議員候選人網站分 配情形與候選人特質之比較,收集到 39 位縣市長候選人網站與 14 位縣市議員網 站,依選舉類別及推薦政黨,表列網站資訊如下(表 4-1-1)。其中,陳明文與陳 麗貞由於是現任者,均以目前縣市政府所設置之網站為自己的競選官網,網站內 容未針對競選另闢專區,主要在凸顯現任者的執政優勢與資源。 4-1-1:縣市長與縣市議員候選人網站名單 縣市長候選人網站 候選人 登記選區 推薦政黨 網站 泛綠陣營(民進黨、台聯)21 羅文嘉 臺北縣 民主進步黨 http://www.wenjia.org/ 陳定南 宜蘭縣 民主進步黨 http://www.mr-clean.org/ 鄭寶清 桃園縣 民主進步黨 http://www.ty136.com.tw/ 林光華 新竹縣 民主進步黨 http://www.2005kh.com/ 邱炳坤 苗栗縣 民主進步黨 http://www.pingkun.org/ 邱太三 臺中縣 民主進步黨 http://tai3.yosinet.net/d_links.asp 翁金珠 彰化縣 民主進步黨 http://www.chgo.org.tw/ 蔡煌瑯 南投縣 民主進步黨 http://huang-lunn.org/ 蘇治芬 雲林縣 民主進步黨 http://www.a-fen.com.tw/ 陳明文 嘉義縣 民主進步黨 (嘉義縣政府網站) http://www.cyhg.gov.tw/ 蘇煥智 臺南縣 民主進步黨 http://www.a-de.com.tw/ 楊秋興 高雄縣 民主進步黨 http://www.ch-yang.idv.tw/index.aspx 曹啟鴻 屏東縣 民主進步黨 http://www.pt-hom.org/ 盧博基 花蓮縣 民主進步黨 http://www.pogi.com.tw/ 鄭貴元 新竹市 民主進步黨 http://www.cqy.idv.tw/ 陳光復 澎湖縣 民主進步黨 http://www.chenkuangfu.idv.tw/ 陳建銘 基隆市 台灣團結聯盟 http://www.alex.org.tw/ 林佳龍 臺中市 民主進步黨 http://www.longtimes.org.tw/

Transcript of 第四章 研究結果與發現 -...

  • 58

    2005

    2005

    39 14

    4-1-1

    4-1-1

    21 http://www.wenjia.org/ http://www.mr-clean.org/ http://www.ty136.com.tw/ http://www.2005kh.com/ http://www.pingkun.org/ http://tai3.yosinet.net/d_links.asp http://www.chgo.org.tw/ http://huang-lunn.org/ http://www.a-fen.com.tw/

    http://www.cyhg.gov.tw/ http://www.a-de.com.tw/ http://www.ch-yang.idv.tw/index.aspx http://www.pt-hom.org/ http://www.pogi.com.tw/ http://www.cqy.idv.tw/ http://www.chenkuangfu.idv.tw/ http://www.alex.org.tw/ http://www.longtimes.org.tw/

  • 59

    http://www.chiayi.gov.tw/2004newweb/index.htm

    http://www.drchienlin.idv.tw/ http://www.tthsu.org/

    16 http://www.weigo.org/ http://www.uptop226.idv.tw/ http://www.llchu.org.tw/ http://www.hsin-chu.org/ http://www.cshuang.idv.tw/ http://www.poyuan.idv.tw/html/index.php http://acd.so-buy.com/front/bin/home.phtml http://www.supershupo.idv.tw/ http://www.cooljun.idv.tw/ http://drkuo.myweb.hinet.net/

    http://www.wretch.cc/user/linyishin94

    http://www.a-hsiung.com/ http://junqjzer.nettime.com.tw/ http://www.wisdom.org.tw/ http://chiayisunny.myweb.hinet.net/ http://www.winner.twmail.cc/

    2 http://up.manygo.com/ http://www.haogo.idv.tw/

    3

    http://shengying.egolife.com/ http://yingchieh.myweb.hinet.net/ http://www.tnhui.com.tw/

    6 http://www.fireworm.idv.tw/ http://www.aprilyao.org http://www.inkololo.idv.tw/ http://www.cjte.org/ http://hipage.hinet.net/shanjen/ http://bauchin.ehosting.com.tw/

    6 http://www.chochoa.com/ http://chun-i.org/ http://www.shesinging.com/html/ http://home.kimo.com.tw/dd20051202/

  • 60

    http://tzu-ching.ehosting.com.tw/ http://www.taconet.com.tw/gentle536/

    2005

    vs.

    4-1-2

    84% 15%

    71.4% 28%81.1%

    48.7%

    35.7%

    41.5%

    56.4%57.1%

    4-1-22005

    N % N %

    33

    84.6

    10

    71.4

    43(81.1)

    6 15.4 4 28.6 10(18.9

    19

    48.7

    3

    21.4

    22(41.5)

    14 35.9 5 35.7 19(35.8) 2 5.1 1 7.1 3(5.7)

    4 10.3 5 35.7 9(17.0)

    1

    2.6

    2

    14.3

    3(5.7)

    / 16 41.0 8 57.1 24(45.3)

    22 56.4 4 28.6 26(49.1)

    14

    38.5

    7

    50

    22(41.5)

    24 61.5 7 50 31(58.5 39 73.6 14 26.4 53(100)

  • 61

    Chi-square

    40 Crosstabs

    4-1-5 4-1-6

    1

    69.2%7.1%2(1N=53)= 12.552p=.000

    4-1-5

    50

    MSN

    4-1-3

    N % N % N % 0 12 30.8 13 92.9 25 47.2 1 16 41.0 1 7.1 17 32.1 2 5 12.8 5 9.4 3 1 2.6 1 1.9 4 3 7.7 3 5.7

  • 62

    5 2 5.1 2 3.8 4.03 2.64 3.66 39 73.6 14 26.4 53 100.0

    4-1-3 1

    41.0% 30.8%

    MSN

    CF

    4-1-1

    CF

    4-1-2

    4-1-1

    Long Times, Long See

  • 63

    4-1-2

    e

    2005 11

    8

    4-1-3

    e

    1 2

    3 4

  • 64

    MSN

    MSN

    92.9%

    1

    199920012001

    Gibson Ward2000

    36

    100%

    53

    36 Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multimedia

  • 65

    JPEGgif

    gifflash

    mp3

    WMPmpeg

    5

    43.6% 4-1-4

    50.0%

    linear37

    4-1-4

    N % N % N %

    2 5 12.8 7 50.0 12 22.6 3 6 15.4 5 35.7 11 20.8 4 11 28.2 2 14.3 13 24.5 5 17 43.6 0 .0 17 32.1 1.31 7.14E-02 0.98 39 100.0 14 100.0 53 100.0

    2sitemap

    37 Hierarchical layoutHybridnon-linear

    accessRosenfeld & Morville, 1998)

  • 66

    Cullen &

    Houghton2000

    3 5.7%

    94.3%

    3search engine

    10 18.9% 9

    Scupio

    Yahoo!Google

    GAISexternalinternal

    4

    10 25.6% 2

    14.3%

    2

  • 67

    74.4%

    2 5.1%

    PSPAV

    79.2%

    3839

    smart

    e-mail

    5

    1 3

    5.7%

    38 100

    100 10 39 17287 8 1000

    10

  • 68

    SMS

    off-line

    13 33.3%

    14.3%

    LOGA

    T-shirt

    POLO 2005

    4 2

    3

    12(1N=53)= 7.015p= .008 4-1-5

    69.2%

    28.6% 4-1-6

    22(1N=53)= 1p= .001

    48.7%.0

    32(1N=53)= 20.571p=.000

    82.1%

    21.4%

  • 69

    news release

    10

    1

    42(1N=53)= 8.045p=.005 4-1-5

    71.8%

    28.6% 4-1-6

    4

    20%

    broadcast

    narrowcast

  • 70

    46.2%38.5%

    35.7%

    43.6%

    4-1-5

    9

    (23.1) 1

    (7.1) 10

    (18.9) 10

    (25.6) 2

    (14.3) 12

    (22.6) 39

    (100) 14

    (100.0) 53

    (100) 27

    (69.2) 1

    (7.1) 28

    (52.8)

    3 (7.7)

    0 (.0)

    3 (5.7)

    29 (74.4)

    8 (42.9)

    37 (69.8)

    2 (5.1)

    1 (7.1)

    2 (3.8)

    33 (84.6)

    9 (64.3)

    42 (79.2)

    1 (2.6)

    0 (.0)

    1 (1.9)

    10 (25.6)

    1 (7.1)

    11 (20.8)

    36 (92.3)

    12 (85.7)

    48 (90.6)

    27 (69.2)

    4 (28.6)

    31 (58.5)

    19 (48.7)

    0 (.0)

    19 (35.8)

    37 (94.9)

    13 (92.9)

    20 (94.3)

    37 (94.9)

    12 (85.7)

    50 (94.3)

    9 (23.1)

    1 (7.1)

    3 (5.7)

  • 71

    33 (84.6)

    6 (42.9)

    39 (73.6)

    14 (35.9)

    3 (21.4)

    17 (32.1)

    3 (7.7)

    0 (.0)

    3 (5.7)

    16 (41.0)

    5 (35.7)

    21 (39.6)

    8 (20.5)

    0 (.0)

    8 (15.1)

    32 (82.1)

    3 (21.4)

    35 (66.0)

    28 (71.8)

    4 (28.6)

    32 (60.4)

    34 (87.2)

    14 (100)

    48 (90.6)

    13 (33.3)

    6 (42.9)

    19 (35.8)

    2 (5.1)

    0 (.0%)

    2 (3.8)

    18 (46.2)

    5 (35.7)

    23 (43.4)

    15 (38.5)

    0 (.0)

    12 (28.3)

    14 (35.9)

    0 (.0)

    14 (26.4)

    MV 3 (7.7)

    0 (.0)

    3 (5.7)

    7 (17.9)

    0 (.0)

    7 (13.2)

    9 (23.1)

    0 (.0)

    9 (17.0)

    17 (43.6)

    1 (7.1)

    18 (34.0)

    14 (35.9)

    2 (14.3)

    16 (30.2)

    17 (43.6)

    5 (35.7)

    22 (41.5)

    5 (12.8)

    1 (7.1)

    6 (11.3)

    3 (7.7)

    0 (.0)

    3 (5.7)

    3 (7.7)

    0 (.0)

    3 (5.7)

    4 (10.3)

    0 (.0)

    4 (7.5)

    13 (33.3)

    2 (14.3)

    15 (28.3)

  • 72

    1 (2.6)

    0 (.0)

    1 (1.9)

    N%

    4-1-6 2 p 5

    1.709 .191 1 25% .758 .384 1 25% 2.839 .092 2 50% 12.552 .000*** 0

    1.142 .285 2 50% 1.449 .229 1 25% .746 .388 2 50% 2.589 .108 1 25% .366 .545 2 50%

    2.143 .143 1 25% .524 .469 2 50% 7.015 .008** 0 1 .001** 0 .078 .780 2 50%

    1.238 .266 2 50%

    1.709 .191 1 25%

    7.799 .005 1 25% .990 .320 1 25% 1.142 .285 2 50% .121 .727 0 3.382 .066 1 25% 16.881 .000*** 0 8.045 .005** 0 1.982 .159 2 50% .406 .524 0

    .746 .388 2 50% .457 .499 0 7.510 .006 1 25% 6.830 .009 1 25% MV 1.142 .285 2 50%

    2.895 .089 1 25% 3.892 .049 1 25% 6.102 .014 1 25% 2.283 .131 1 25%

    .263 .608 0 .331 .565 2 50%

  • 73

    1.142 .285 2 50% 1.142 .285 2 50% 1.553 .213 2 50% 1.842 .175 1 25%

    .366 .545 2 50% 1*p< .05**p< .01***p< .001 220%

    Chi-square

    40 Crosstabs

    Correlation

    4-1-7

  • 74

    4-1-7

    r=1.000 p= .

    r= .493 p= .000**

    r= .623 p= .000**

    r= .638 p= .000**

    r= .485 p= .000**

    r= .451 p= .001**

    r= .555 p= .000**

    r= .493 p= .000**

    r=1.000 p= .

    r= .374 p= .006**

    r= .402 p= .003**

    r= .384 p= .005**

    r= .403 p= .003**

    r= .551 p= .000**

    r= .623 p= .000**

    r= .370 p= .870**

    r=1.000 p= .

    r= .510 p= .000**

    r= .373 p= .006**

    r= .560 p= .000**

    r= .352 p= .010**

    r= .638 p= .000**

    r= .402 p= .003

    r= .505 p= .000**

    r=1.000 p= .

    r= .332 p= .015

    r= .417 p= .002**

    r= .595 p= .000**

    r= .485 p= .001**

    r= .384 p= .005**

    r= .380 p= .005**

    r= .332 p= .015*

    r=1.000 p= .

    r= .043 p= .761

    r= .161 p= .250

    r= .451 p= .001**

    r= .403 p= .000**

    r= .560 p= .000**

    r= .417 p= .002**

    r= .043 p= .761

    r=1.000 p= .

    r= .519 p= .000**

    r= .555 p= .000**

    r= .551 p= .000**

    r= .360 p= .008**

    r= .595 p= .000**

    r= .161 p= .250

    r= .519 p= .000**

    r=1.000 p= .

    *p< .05**p< .01

    TIndependent-Samples T Test

    One-way ANOVA

    4-1-8

  • 75

    1F=9.432 p= .003 .05

    5.85

    2.86

    2F=12.310p= .001 .05

    1.41

    .36

    3F=11.703p= .001 .05

    5.85

    4-1-8 T

    N F p 39 5.85 2.39

    14 2.86 .95 9.432 .003**

    39 1.87 .95

    14 1.43 .85 .007 .935

    39 8.95 2.14 14 5.79 1.89

    .603 .441

    39 1.41 1.27 14 .36 .50

    12.310 .001**

    39 1.46 1.17 14 .57 .94

    3.726 .059

    39 .18 .51 14 7.14E-02 .27

    2.585 .114

    39 .54 .76 14 .14 .36

    11.703 .001**

    **p< .01

  • 76

    1

    4-1-8

    4-1-9 T

    N F p 43 5.12 2.48

    10 4.80 2.62 .031 .721

    43 1.74 1.00 10 1.80 .63

    2.922 .867

    43 8.23 2.59 10 7.60 2.07

    1.040 .313

    43 1.19 1.20 10 .90 1.29

    .285 .506

    43 1.33 1.13 10 .80 1.32

    .444 .204

    43 .14 .47 10 .20 .42

    .265 .709

    43 .42 .70 10 .50 .71

    .068 .742

  • 77

    2

    4-1-9

    4-1-10 N F p

    22 5.95 2.54 19 4.68 2.33 3 6.67 2.52

    9 3.31 1.27

    3.929 .014 *

    22 1.91 .87 19 1.63 1.01 3

    9 1.22 .67

    3.464 .023 *

    22 8.82 2.22 19 8.11 2.54 3 8.67 2.08

    9 6.11 2.52

    2.809 .049 *

    22 1.41 1.22 19 1.32 1.20 3 1.00 1.73

    9 .11 .33

    2.987 .040 *

    22 1.14 1.08 19 1.37 1.16 3

    9 .56 1.01

    4.009 .012 *

    22 .18 .50 19 .16 .50 3

    9 .11 .33

    .160 .923

    22 .55 .80 19 .32 .58 3 1.00 1.00

    9 .22 .44

    1.345 .271

    1* p< .05 2=

    1F= 3.929 p= .014 .054-1-9

  • 78

    Scheffe4-1-105.95

    3.31p= .029 .05

    4-1-11Scheffe

    : Scheffe

    1.27 .72 .384 -.81 3.35-.71 1.41 .968 -4.81 3.382.84* .91 .029 .21 5.48

    -1.27 .72 .384 -3.35 .81-1.98 1.43 .591 -6.11 2.151.57 .93 .422 -1.12 4.26

    .71 1.41 .968 -3.38 4.811.98 1.43 .591 -2.15 6.113.56 1.53 .160 -.88 7.99

    -2.84* .91 .029 -5.48 -.21-1.57 .93 .422 -4.26 1.12-3.56 1.53 .160 -7.99 .88

    (J)

    (I)

    (I-J)

    95%

    .05 *.

  • 79

    2F= 3.464 p= .023 .054-1-9

    Scheffep= .036 .05

    4-1-11

    4-1-12Scheffe

    : Scheffe

    .28 .28 .797 -.52 1.07-1.09 .54 .267 -2.66 .47

    .69 .35 .284 -.32 1.69-.28 .28 .797 -1.07 .52

    -1.37 .55 .113 -2.95 .21.41 .36 .724 -.62 1.44

    1.09 .54 .267 -.47 2.661.37 .55 .113 -.21 2.951.78* .59 .036 8.27E-02 3.47-.69 .35 .284 -1.69 .32-.41 .36 .724 -1.44 .62

    -1.78* .59 .036 -3.47 -8.27E-02

    (J)

    (I)

    (I-J)

    95%

    .05 *.

  • 80

    3F= 2.809 p= .049 .054-1-9

    Tukey8.826.11

    p= .029 .054-1-12

    4-1-13Sheffe Tukey

    :

    .66 .74 .810 -1.31 2.63

    .15 1.46 1.000 -3.73 4.032.71* .94 .029 .21 5.20-.66 .74 .810 -2.63 1.31-.51 1.47 .986 -4.43 3.412.05 .96 .157 -.50 4.60-.15 1.46 1.000 -4.03 3.73.51 1.47 .986 -3.41 4.43

    2.56 1.58 .379 -1.65 6.76-2.71* .94 .029 -5.20 -.21-2.05 .96 .157 -4.60 .50-2.56 1.58 .379 -6.76 1.65

    .66 .74 .851 -1.49 2.81

    .15 1.46 1.000 -4.07 4.382.71 .94 .051 -8.53E-03 5.42-.66 .74 .851 -2.81 1.49-.51 1.47 .989 -4.77 3.752.05 .96 .222 -.73 4.82-.15 1.46 1.000 -4.38 4.07.51 1.47 .989 -3.75 4.77

    2.56 1.58 .462 -2.02 7.13-2.71 .94 .051 -5.42 8.53E-03-2.05 .96 .222 -4.82 .73-2.56 1.58 .462 -7.13 2.02

    (J)

    (I)

    Tukey HSD

    Scheffe

    (I-J)

    95%

    .05 *.

  • 81

    4F= 2.987 p= .040 .054-1-9

    Tukey1.41 .11

    p= .030 .054-1-13

    4-1-14Sheffe Tukey

    :

    9.33E-02 .36 .994 -.86 1.05.41 .71 .938 -1.47 2.28

    1.30* .45 .030 9.24E-02 2.50-9.33E-02 .36 .994 -1.05 .86

    .32 .71 .971 -1.58 2.211.20 .46 .058 -2.82E-02 2.44-.41 .71 .938 -2.28 1.47-.32 .71 .971 -2.21 1.58.89 .76 .652 -1.14 2.92

    -1.30* .45 .030 -2.50 -9.24E-02-1.20 .46 .058 -2.44 2.82E-02

    -.89 .76 .652 -2.92 1.149.33E-02 .36 .995 -.95 1.13

    .41 .71 .953 -1.63 2.451.30 .45 .054 -1.44E-02 2.61

    -9.33E-02 .36 .995 -1.13 .95.32 .71 .978 -1.74 2.38

    1.20 .46 .094 -.14 2.55-.41 .71 .953 -2.45 1.63-.32 .71 .978 -2.38 1.74.89 .76 .717 -1.32 3.10

    -1.30 .45 .054 -2.61 1.44E-02-1.20 .46 .094 -2.55 .14

    -.89 .76 .717 -3.10 1.32

    (J)

    (I)

    Tukey HSD

    Scheffe

    (I-J)

    95%

    .05 *.

  • 82

    5F= 4.009 p= .012 .054-1-9

    4-1-14

    a. Scheffe

    p= .015

    b. Tukeyp= .007

    p= .035

    4-1-15Sheffe Tukey

    :

    -.23 .34 .902 -1.13 .67-1.86* .67 .035 -3.63 -9.47E-02

    .58 .43 .531 -.56 1.72

    .23 .34 .902 -.67 1.13-1.63 .67 .085 -3.42 .15

    .81 .44 .259 -.35 1.981.86* .67 .035 9.47E-02 3.631.63 .67 .085 -.15 3.422.44* .72 .007 .53 4.36-.58 .43 .531 -1.72 .56-.81 .44 .259 -1.98 .35

    -2.44* .72 .007 -4.36 -.53-.23 .34 .925 -1.21 .75

    -1.86 .67 .061 -3.79 6.21E-02.58 .43 .609 -.66 1.82.23 .34 .925 -.75 1.21

    -1.63 .67 .131 -3.58 .31.81 .44 .338 -.45 2.08

    1.86 .67 .061 -6.21E-02 3.791.63 .67 .131 -.31 3.582.44* .72 .015 .36 4.53-.58 .43 .609 -1.82 .66-.81 .44 .338 -2.08 .45

    -2.44* .72 .015 -4.53 -.36

    (J)

    (I)

    Tukey HSD

    Scheffe

    (I-J)

    95%

    .05 *.

  • 83

    3

    4-1-15

    4-1-16

    N F p 3 4.00 2.65 / 24 4.50 2.32

    26 5.69 2.54

    1.777 .180

    3 2.00 1.00 / 24 1.83 .92

    26 1.65 .98

    .328 .722

    3 7.00 2.65 / 24 7.71 2.58

    26 8.58 2.38

    1.149 .325

    3 1.00 1.00 / 24 1.04 1.12

    26 1.23 1.34

    .166 .848

    3 1.33 1.15 / 24 1.08 1.18

    26 1.35 1.20

    .319 .728

    3 / 24 8.33E-02 .41

    26 .23 .51

    .822 .445

    3 / 24 .46 .72

    26 .46 .71

    .613 .546

    =

  • 84

    2005

    2004a 2001

    2005

    40

    40

  • 85

    2005 12 24

    2006 3 3

    4-2-1

    2005 12 24 3

    2006 3 3

    1 30

    1/7

    2008

    Hill & Hughes, 1998

    Morris, 1999/2000; Davis, 1999Rachel & Stephen, 2000

    Margolis Resnick2000

    Bimber Davis2003Benoit 2003Kamarck1999

  • 86

    Conway Dorner2004

    effectiveness

    2004

    2004

    iparty

    2006

    2000

  • 87

    2006

    http://www.dpp.org.tw/

    hierarchical2005

    41 19

    www.kmt.orgwin www.kmtwin.org

    flash

    Wayback Machine42

    4-2-2

    2001 1 16 2003 6

    http://www.wenjia.org

    2005 4

    41 http://www.dpp.org.tw/news/pub/LIT_2.asp 42 http://www.archive.org/web/web.php

  • 88

    2005 6

    2005 8 2 http://www.weigo.org 2005 10 15

    4-2-2

    10 15

    2006

    2001

    2003

    2004

    2005

    wenjia.org

    2006

  • 89

    domain

    1

    Ireland Nash2001.com .org

    .com .org

    .com

    .com .org

    .org

    2

    2006 4

    2001

  • 90

    2006

    Taipei

    Taipei-We

    Go

    2005 10 5

    2005

    ()

    2005 4 2

    2005

    2005 4

  • 91

    slogan

    2006

    2005

    E2

    2005

    2005

  • 92

    2006

    2004

    2004 2004

    2006

  • 93

    2006

    2000

    2005

  • 94

    2005

    2005

    Margolis 1997 1996

    2005

    part-time

    post

  • 95

    2005

    MSN

    meeting

    meeting2006

    1

    2

    3

  • 96

    20~39

    2005

    2005

    30

    2006

  • 97

    Google Adword

    Google Adword

    Google YahooGooglePChomeMSN

    2005

    10 15

    2005

    2005

    LOGO

    43

    43

  • 98

    2005

    James Carville

    2005

    2006

    Google

    Google ADword

    Google

    2006

  • 99

    2006

    1

    LOGA

    2

    Google

    3

    visitors

    Technorati

    12 14 39

    14

    39 12

    14

  • 100

    4-2-3

    1

    1

    Whillock1998

    Alexa

    2.8 28%slow 4.9

    11%very slow

    sizecomplexity

    text-based

    Whillock, 1998

    text-based

    graphical user interface

    Powell,

    2000/2001

  • 101

    1/3 1/2

    flash

    next

    flash

    2005

    2

    retention

  • 102

    MSN 4-2-1 4-2-2

    16

    4-2-1

    4-2-2

    PSPPlay Show PostMSN

    4-2-3 4-2-4

  • 103

    Q

    4-2-3

    4-2-4MSN

    3

    a.

    b.

    c.

    d.

  • 104

    Conger & Mason1998

    effectivenesseffectivenessnavigational efficiency

    Conger & Mason1998

    effectivenesseffectiveness

    navigational efficiency

    2

    sender

    1

    PSP

    2003a

    user-to-user interaction

  • 105

    2003b

    2001 Kamarck1999

    27%Stromer-Galley2000

    a.

  • 106

    b.

    2006

    2006

    2005

    2005

    2005

    c.

    a

  • 107

    Q MSN

    b

    2006

    2004

    2004

    44

    44

  • 108

    2005

    Margolis et al., 1997

    2005

    2005

  • 109

    2005

    c

    hi~

    d.

    a

    user user-friendly

    user

  • 110

    user

    2006

    user

    2006

    b

    2005

    2005

    e.

  • 111

    Stromer-Galley, 2000

    2005

    2

    PSP

    a.

    b.

    c.

    3

    2004 iparty

    AV

    2004

  • 112

    2006

    AV

    PSP

    2005

    !

    ! update

    2006

    a.

    b.

    4e-mail

  • 113

    text-based

    on-line

    off-line

    2004

    270

    2005

    Ireland Nash 48

    2003a

    45

    e-mail

    e-mail

    2005

    e-mail

    2005

    45

  • 114

    2004

    2005 email

    2006

    3

    Owen, Davis Strickler1999

    Yiannakis, 1982Kamarck1999

    2001

    1

    2005

  • 115

    20

    45

    2005

    Bowers-Brown

    2001retention efficiency

    update

    2006

    2005

    2

    DNA

  • 116

    2005

    pdf

    flash

    3

    Weaver & Drew,

    1995; McKinnon, Tedesco & Kaid, 1993

    Auer1962

    1confrontation

    2in equal and adequate time

    3of matched contestants

    4on a stated proposition

    5to gain an audience decision

    1995

    2005

    2005

    2005 11 3

  • 117

    slogan 27

    16

    1

    2

    3

    Whillock, 1998

    4

    CF

    CF

    CF

    2005

    CFMV

    108

  • 118

    5 CF 2 MV

    2

    CF PSP

    11 CF 4 MV

    5

    external

    Owen et al., 1999, 2004aOwen 1999

    C-SPANCNN

    visibility

    awareness

    34

  • 119

    external links

    6

    1

    eCard

    e-mail e-card

  • 120

    2004

    email

    2004

    email

    2

    11

    4

  • 121

    2005

    7

    1

    2

    2004 Howard Dean

    2005

  • 122

    3

    T-shirtPOLO

    2005

    1998

    LOGA

    2005

  • 123

    2005

    2006

    2004

    2006

    2004

    2006

    4

    5

  • 124

    Bowers-Brown2001

    4-2-3

    SNG PSP

    5 22 24

    11

    16

    MSN

    CF

    MSN MVCF

    PSP>

    PSP>AV

    PSP>

    /

  • 125

    //

    24

    SNG>> 106

    116

    SNG>>

    >

    > 2 >

    PSP>>CF

    >

    PSP>>MV MP3

    >

    MV PSP>>MV

    >

    >

    >

  • 126

    PSP>

    PSP>>

    >

    >

    >

    >

    PSP>>LOGA

    hitsvisitorsunique

    visituserpage viewclick through

    view timeCPM2004

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

  • 127

    2005

    2005

    IP2006

    2006

    2005

    Ireland Nash2001onlineoffline

    2006

  • 128

    2005

    2005

    2006

    2005 1

    23

  • 129

    2005

    10 14

    2005

    2006

    Ireland & Nash, 2001

  • 130

    46 Willock1998 1996

    2006

    2004

    2005

    2006

    institutional rules

    social and demographic traitspsychological resources

    mobilization effortsLeighle, 1995

    cantdont want to

    nobody asked(Verba, Schlozman, Brady & Nie, 1991)

    46 Ireland & Nash2001 2000 Green Party Ralph Nader Al Gore

  • 131

    2001

    Verba & Nie, 1972

    Verba, Nie & Kim, 1978

    1998

    Craig, Niemi & Silver, 1990

    Austin & Pinkleton, 1995

    2001

    Lee 200540%

    18%

    Dan Gillmor 2004/2005

    2005

    2006

    18-25 Levine, Peter & Lopez,

    2005

    Bennett & Xenos, 2004 PEW/Internet &

  • 132

    American Life Projec 18-29

    30-49 Lee et al., 2005

    2006

    2004 40%

    18%

    31.5%5%Lee,

    Cornfield & Horrigan, 2005

    cynicism2002

    2006

    2005

    BSP, Blog Service Provider

  • 133

    2004 47 2005 18

    early adopter48

    4-3-1

    3 2 22 19

    18

    21

    11 Yam Blog

    3 4-3-2

    9

    6 2

    Howard Dean

    47 http://blog.sina.com.tw/ 48 Rogers1962diffusion of innovations13.5%

  • 134

    4-3-1

    9 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wenjia

    Wretch

    http://blog.xuite.net/wenjia/best

    Xuite

    http://bloguide.ettoday.com/wenjia1966/

    Bloguide

    http://blog.yam.com/mr_clean/

    Yam Blog

    //

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/Jlon

    Wretch

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/taison

    Wretch

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/ade2005

    Wretch

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/younggiant

    Wretch

    N/A

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/ptlife

    Wretch

    N/A

    http://blog.yam.com/longtimes

    Yam Blog

    http://www.tthsu.org/blog.asp

    /

    6 http://blog.xuite.net/

    chou3410/weigo Xuite

  • 135

    http://myblog.pchome.com.tw/weigo2005/

    PChome

    http://www.uptop226.idv.tw/

    http://www.hsin-chu.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=0&Itemid=9

    http://blog.yam.com/cshuang/

    Yam Blog

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/linyishin94

    Wretch

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/drkuo

    Wretch

    2 http://www.wretch.c

    c/blog/hsiunghsiungWretch

    http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wisdom2005

    Wretch

    2 http://www.wretch.c

    c/blog/haogo56 Wretch

    http://blog.yam.com/a_hai/

    Wretch

    4-3-22005 BSP BSP

    Wretch

    Yam Blog Xuite PChome Bloguide

  • 136

    12 6 11

    13 4-3-3

    1

    Xuite BSP

    2006

    Rachel & Stephen, 2000; Roper, 1998

    Roper, 1998

    1

    Xuite 2005

    Bloguide

    Bloguide

    Bloguide

    2003

    Gary Davis Davis

  • 137

    Madame Davis Fievet & Turretttin, 2004/2006

    Xuite

    Bloguide

    Xuite

    2006

    2

    2006

    2006

    2

    1

    BSP

  • 138

    2005

    2

    Xuite

    Xuite PChome

    2005

    Xuite PChome Xuite

    PChome Xuite

    8 19 10 3 10 16

  • 139

    5

    Xuite

    2006

    4-3-3 BSP

    49 Xuite

    2005/8/19 27

    50 PChome 2005/10/16 21 51

    Bloguide

    2005/7/21 12

    52 Wretch 2005/5/17 46

    53 Xuite

    2005/5/17 44

    49 Xuite http://blog.xuite.net/chou3410/weigo 50 http://myblog.pchome.com.tw/weigo2005/ 51 http://bloguide.ettoday.com/wenjia1966/ 52 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/wenjia 53 http://blog.xuite.net/wenjia/

  • 140

    Herring, Scheidt, Bonus & Wright200431%

    full name

    10 16 PChome

    Xuite

    Xuite

    Xuite

    Xuite

    1

    26

  • 141

    wenjia&Joy

    Conger & Mason1998navigational efficiency

    use-friendliness

    linear

    2

    linkside

    link tobe

    linked

    1

    2004 Howard Dean

    54

    54 The Washington Post Howard Dean Dean Bulkeley & Bandler, 2005

  • 142

    Howard Dean

    Fievet & Turretttin, 2004/2006

    third-party

    endorsement

    Herring

    2004 203

    badge 30.5%

    3 4-3-4

    V1942 55

    56

    2

    visitors

    Shirky2003

    55 V1942 http://www.v1492.org/ 56 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lushihyuan

  • 143

    57

    Fievet & Turretttin, 2004/2006

    Technorati58

    143 59 24

    2

    3

    Blood2002a

    Herring 2004

    31.8% 1/3

    0.65

    Blood2002a

    Herring

    2004

    57 Shirky 58 Technoratihttp://www.technorati.com David Sifry 2002 11 blogosphere 59 3 Xuite

  • 144

    Trammell, Williams, Postelnicu & Landreville, 2006

    4-3-4

    0 3 0 2 143 18 0 2 0

    3

    10 17 10 18

    4-3-5

    21

    2005 10 1

    2005 10 3 10 1

    10 1 10 3

    11 13

  • 145

    2005

    4-3-5PChome

    15:21 15:19 15:17 3C 15:16 15:13 15:12

    2005-10-18

    15:02 21:23 21:21 21:20 16 20:40 20:38 19:28 15:25 15:23 15:21 15:19 15:06 15:03 14:58

    2005-10-17

    14:51

    6011 13 12 3 20

    11 23

    60 10 3 11 2

  • 146

    Whats New

    Blood, 2002b

    Herring

    200461

    4

    blogsphere

    61 0~63 Herring et al., 2004

  • 147

    Fievet & Turretttin, 2004/2006

    Howard Dean 2004

    Dean for America

    1

    PChome

    21 3 6

    2004 PCHome

    Rafaeli1988reactive

    16

    400 89

  • 148

    2006

    2

    BSP

    Fievet & Turretttin,

    2004/2006 BSP

    BSP

    BSP

    Xuite

    email

    Bloguide BSP BSP

    BSP

  • 149

    1

    2 Johnsonn-Cartee & Copeland1991

    3

    4

    1

    2

    3

    1

    2

  • 150

    2005

    diversified

    16

    2005

    2005

    4-3-7 4-3-8

    CF 4-3-7

    4-3-6Xuite

  • 151

    2005.11.13 16:45 29 0 2005.11.09 23:23 VS 15 0 2005.11.05 14:43 333

    16 0

    15:24 !!! 2 0 2005.11.02 14:48 CF

    2005.10.3 13:13 2005 10 1

    1 0

    2005.10.02 13:46

    1 0

    2005.10.01 15:51 3C 0 0 2005.09.30 14:05 0 0 2005.09.27 14:09 0 0 2005.09.20 14:13

    0 0

    2005.09.15 14:53 0 0 2005.09.14 14:59 0 0 2005.09.11 15:03

    0 0

    2005.09.08 16:23 16

    0 0

    2005.09.06 16:08 0 0 2005.09.04 17:10 0 0 2005.09.02 19:14 0 0

    21:30 0 0 2005.09.01 16:28 0 0 2005.08.29 17:30 2 0 2005.08.28 10:31

    0 0

    2005.08.27 21:34

    0 0

    2005.08.25 20:37 0 0 2005.08.23 12:42 0 0 2005.08.22 18:46 0 0 2005.08.19 22:48 0 0

    4-3-7

    2005.12.06 16:54

    400 89

    2005.11.30 19:45 557 1

  • 152

    2005.11.27 12:17 115 0 2005.11.23 19:00 74 0 2005.11.16 11:32 71 1 2005.11.13 12:15 Party 42 0 2005.11.10 12:59 25 0 2005.11.08 16:42 39 1 2005.11.03 20:54 66 8 2005.10.27 18:02 76 9 2005.10.23 14:42

    84 1

    2005.10.22 16:15 102 0 2005.10.13 17:50 94 0 2005.09.29 11:51 126 0 2005.09.20 15:09 37 0 2005.09.12 13:11 30 22 2005.09.05 10:27 MV 33 0 2005.08.29 14:47 88 1 2005.08.17 23:16 59 0 2005.08.07 23:50 33 0 2005.08.01 15:35 27 2 2005.07.28 18:10 30 0 2005.07.25 14:26 27 2 2005.07.21 19:06 36 0 2005.07.13 23:13

    Twins

    26 2

    2005.07.11 19:29 27 0 2005.07.07 24:36

    2005.07.04 15:26 100 53 6 2005.06.30 15:12 35 1 2005.06.29 18:39 38 0 2005.06.22 19:21 D 78 9 2005.06.20 11:53 14 0 2005.06.16 11:20 30 0 2005.06.13 15:52 22 0 2005.06.10 17:07 19 0 2005.06.08 14:30 16 0 2005.06.07 14:51 11 1 2005.06.06 16:33 12 0 2005.06.02 19:02 34 0 2005.06.01 16:24 10 0 2005.05.31 16:49 4 0

  • 153

    2005.05.30 12:09 4 0 2005.05.28 18:07 8 0 2005.05.27 18:15 7 0 2005.05.20 21:18 4 0 2005.05.17 21:26 7 0

    4-3-8 Bloguide

    2005.09.15 21:07:13 18 0 2005.09.06 20:03:25 19 0 2005.08.11 17:30:40 20 0 2005.08.02 19:04:27 6 0 2005.08.01 14:02:22 6 0 2005.08.01 13:41:17 1 0 2005.07.29 17:40:49 Party 10 0 2005.07.27 12:00:06 10 0 2005.07.26 10:46:31 0 0 2005.07.23 15:58:27 9 0 2005.07.22 13:40:01 6 0 2005.07.21 13:24:18 10 0

    10 4 10 21

    92

    Google

    weigo

    wiego

  • 154

    2005

    =

    2005

    1996

    prodormal crisis stage9~104

  • 155

    2005

    2005

    2005

    acute crisis stage1021~1023

    2005

  • 156

    2006102120061022

    62

    2006

    mark

    62 2005 11 22 2006 3 29http://www.gov.tw/news/cna/life/news/200511/20051122687249.html

  • 157

    2005

    102123

    2006

    LOGO

    Morris19991

    23

    CoCo

    CoCo

    2006

    1124

    Fievet & Turretttin2004/2006

  • 158

    2006

    2006

    2005

  • 159

    2005

    2004 Howard Dean

    policy announcement

    2006

    2004 Howard Dean Dean for

    America 2003 3

    DeanSpace

  • 160

    Dean

    promote

    internet fund raising

    security

    2006

    1

    2

    3

    14

    1

    1

  • 161

    use-friendliness

    linear

    wenjia&Joy

    2

    1

    2

    3

    4

    3

    4

    16

    12 6

    400 89

  • 162

    k-log

    Smolkin2004

    spill-over63

    63 alternativeestablishedspill-over effect