CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. ·...

50
1 | CATT for Team Officials | BC Hockey Evaluation 2017 BC Hockey Concussion Policy Evaluation: Concussion Awareness Training Tool for Team Officials August 2017

Transcript of CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. ·...

Page 1: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 1  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

         

   

BC  Hockey  Concussion  Policy  Evaluation:  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  for  Team  Officials    August  2017  

                                                           

Page 2: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 2  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

     

 The  BC  Injury  Research  and  Prevention  Unit  (BCIRPU),  established  in  August  1997,  is  located  at  BC  Children’s  Hospital  and  is  a  core  research  program  within  the  Evidence  to  Innovation  theme  at  the  research  institute  of  BC  Children's  Hospital.  BCIRPU  also  serves  as  a  training  centre,  and  the  staff  at  the  Unit  may  hold  faculty  appointments  at  the  University  of  British  Columbia.  BCIRPU  was  established  as  a  strategic  entity,  blending  the  need  for  research  and  evidence  with  best  practices  and  the  development  of  policies  and  programs  to  reduce  injury  in  BC.    Authors:  Kyle  Scoten,  Kate  Turcotte,  Shelina  Babul    Acknowledgements:  We  would  also  like  to  extend  our  appreciation  to  Fahra  Rajabali  for  her  assistance  with  data  analysis.      Funding  for  the  BC  Hockey  evaluation  of  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  online  course  for  BC  Hockey  team  officials  was  provided  by  the  Community  Health  Endowment  Fund  and  the  BC  Injury  Research  and  Prevention  Unit.    BC  Injury  Research  and  Prevention  Unit  F508-­‐4480  Oak  Street  Vancouver,  BC  V6H  3V4  Email:  [email protected]  Phone:  (604)  875-­‐3776  Fax:  (604)  875-­‐3569  Website:  http://www.injuryresearch.bc.ca    Reproduction,  in  its  original  form,  is  permitted  for  background  use  for  private  study,  education  instruction  and  research,  provided  appropriate  credit  is  given  to  the  BC  Injury  Research  and  Prevention  Unit.  Citation  in  editorial  copy,  for  newsprint,  radio  and  television  is  permitted.  The  material  may  not  be  reproduced  for  commercial  use  or  profit,  promotion,  resale,  or  publication  in  whole  or  in  part  without  written  permission  from  the  BC  Injury  Research  and  Prevention  Unit.    August  2017                      Photo  Credits:  Cover  photo:  ppc.cattonline.com;  p.  5:  panko971/Shutterstock;  p.  6:  BC  Hockey.  2017  BC  Hockey  Annual  General  Meeting  (AGM);  p.  11:  Click  Images/  Shutterstock;  p.  17:  Ron  Chapple/Dreamstime.com.    

Page 3: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 3  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Table  of  Contents  Overview  ................................................................................................................................  4  

Introduction  ...........................................................................................................................  5  Rationale.....................................................................................................................................  6  Objectives  ...................................................................................................................................  6  

Methods  .................................................................................................................................  7  Data  Analysis  ..............................................................................................................................  7  

Results  ....................................................................................................................................  8  Demographics  .............................................................................................................................  9  Knowledge  ................................................................................................................................  10  Attitudes  ...................................................................................................................................  11  Notable  Cross-­‐Tabulations  .......................................................................................................  17  Participant  Feedback  ................................................................................................................  26  

Discussion  .............................................................................................................................  28  Limitations  ................................................................................................................................  28  

Next  Steps  ............................................................................................................................  29  

References  ............................................................................................................................  30  

Appendices  ...........................................................................................................................  31  

Appendix  A—Email  Introduction  ...........................................................................................  32  

Appendix  B—CATT  Evaluation  Survey  ...................................................................................  33  

Appendix  C—Results  Tables  ..................................................................................................  36  Awareness  ................................................................................................................................  36  Knowledge  ................................................................................................................................  37  Attitudes  ...................................................................................................................................  38  Demographics  ...........................................................................................................................  41  

Appendix  D—Results  Tables  for  Notable  Cross-­‐Tabulations  ..................................................  43        

Page 4: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 4  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Overview  A  concussion  is  a  brain  injury  caused  by  a  direct  blow  to  the  head,  face,  neck,  or  elsewhere  on  the  body  with  an  impulsive  force  transmitted  to  the  head.  A  concussion  results  in  a  range  of  clinical  signs  and  symptoms  that  may  or  may  not  involve  loss  of  consciousness.  When  managed  appropriately  most  concussions  resolve  without  complications;  however,  symptoms  may  be  prolonged  in  some  cases.  

The  real  dangers  of  most  concussions  occur  when  the  injury  is  not  recognized  or  the  player  is  not  managed  properly.  Returning  to  activities  too  early  can  put  a  player  at  increased  risk  for  future  concussions  and  serious  complications.  If  a  player  suffers  subsequent  concussion  before  having  recovered  from  a  previous  concussion,  the  effects  can  be  worse  and  result  in  more  serious  complications.  

Coaches,  including  community  volunteer  coaches,  need  to  know  the  principles  of  concussion  recognition,  response,  and  management  in  order  to  identify  high-­‐risk  situations  and  take  appropriate  action  when  a  player  sustains  an  injury  that  could  cause  a  concussion.  

The  Canadian  Paediatric  Society  recommends  that  anyone  involved  in  child  and  youth  sport  should  be  educated  about  the  signs  and  symptoms  of  concussion  and  the  appropriate  management  of  a  child  with  a  concussion.  In  June  2016,  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  [www.cattonline.com]  online  course  for  Coaches  was  mandated  by  BC  Hockey  to  be  completed  by  all  team  officials  prior  to  the  start  of  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season  [1].  

CATT  for  Coaches  was  developed  to  provide  up-­‐to-­‐date  educational  training  on  the  recognition,  response,  management,  and  prevention  of  concussions  in  the  form  of:  

• Online  course  for  coaches  • The  Concussion  Response  Tool  (smartphone  accessible  and  fillable)  • The  Return  to  Sport  tool  • Situational  and  knowledge-­‐based  questions  • Frequently  asked  questions  • Printable  handouts,  related  websites,  journal  articles,  and  additional  resources  

The  objectives  of  this  evaluation  were  to  determine  whether  the  CATT  training  led  to  positive  changes  in  knowledge  around  concussion  recognition  and  management  among  BC  Hockey  team  officials,  as  well  as  to  explore  the  level  of  interest  in  mandating  the  CATT  training  for  the  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players.  Participant  feedback  will  also  be  used  to  enhance  the  CATT  website.  

A  total  of  1,735  online  surveys  were  collected.  Overall,  BC  Hockey  team  officials  reported  a  significant  increase  in  concussion  knowledge  following  the  CATT  training;  and  that  extending  the  CATT  training  mandate  to  the  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players  should  be  strongly  considered.  

Proper  concussion  management  may  decrease  the  risk  of  brain  damage  and  potentially  reduce  long-­‐term  health  issues.  CATT  is  currently  being  updated  to  incorporate  the  5th  International  Consensus  Statement  on  Concussion  in  Sport.  Funding  for  this  project  was  provided  by  the  Community  Health  Endowment  Fund  and  the  BC  Injury  Research  and  Prevention  Unit.      

Page 5: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 5  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Introduction  Concussion,  a  mild  traumatic  brain  injury  (mTBI),  has  received  a  growing  amount  of  attention  in  recent  years,  particularly  amongst  those  in  the  sporting  community,  with  a  coinciding  increase  in  levels  of  awareness  and  concussion-­‐based  research.  Among  children  and  youth  in  Canada  who  visit  an  emergency  department  for  a  sports-­‐related  head  injury,  39%  were  diagnosed  with  concussions,  while  another  24%  were  possible  concussions  [2].  Further,  rates  of  reported  sport-­‐related  head  injuries  have  increased  in  Canada  over  the  past  decade,  as  hockey,  football,  and  soccer  have  all  shown  a  greater  than  40%  increase  in  rates  of  reported  head  injury  between  2004  and  2014  among  children  and  youth  [2].  

A  concussion  is  caused  by  a  direct  blow  to  the  head,  face,  neck,  or  elsewhere  on  the  body  with  an  impulsive  force  transmitted  to  the  head.  It  is  important  to  note  that  a  concussion  can  result  in  a  range  of  clinical  signs  and  symptoms  that  may  or  may  not  involve  a  loss  of  consciousness  [3].  Symptoms  can  be  somatic  (ex.  headache),  cognitive  (feeling  foggy)  and/or  emotional  (lability),  while  other  domains  include  physical  signs,  balance  impairment,  behavioral  changes,  cognitive  impairment,  and  sleep/wake  disturbances  [3].  Recommended  treatment  following  a  concussion  involves  a  period  of  cognitive  and  physical  rest  during  the  acute  stage  (24-­‐48  hours)  after  the  injury,  followed  by  gradual  and  progressive  return  to  activity  while  staying  below  the  cognitive  and  physical  symptom-­‐exacerbation  threshold  [3].  

Although  symptoms  experienced  typically  resolve  within  a  few  days  or  weeks  following  a  concussion,  some  individuals  experience  persistent  symptoms  for  several  months  after  the  injury.  Research  suggests  that  15%  of  individuals  with  a  history  of  mTBI  suffering  from  deficits  one  year  after  injury  [4].  For  those  experiencing  persistent  symptoms  and  impairments  following  injury,  a  variety  of  treatments  may  be  required,  with  data  supporting  interventions  including  psychological,  cervical,  and  vestibular  rehabilitation  [3].  

Returning  to  sport  too  quickly  following  a  concussion  may  also  lead  to  recovery  complications  and  places  an  athlete  at  increased  risk  of  sustaining  a  subsequent  concussion  [5].  As  a  result,  it  is  crucial  that  parents,  players,  and  coaches  be  supported  in  becoming  better  educated  on  the  recognition,  response,  and  management  of  concussion,  and  made  aware  of  the  increased  risks  of  returning  to  play  too  soon  following  a  concussion  [6].  

The  2016  Consensus  Statement  on  Concussion  in  Sport  is  the  most  up-­‐to-­‐date  set  of  principal  messages  regarding  the  ever-­‐evolving  science  of  sport-­‐related  concussion  [3].  This  resource  includes  discussion  on  the  11  ‘R’s  of  sport-­‐related  concussion:  Recognize;  Remove;  Re-­‐evaluate;  Rest;  Rehabilitation;  Refer;  Recover;  Return  to  sport;  Reconsider;  Residual  effects  and  sequelae;  and  Risk  reduction.    

Despite  this  work,  uncertainty  and  controversy  still  exists  amongst  the  sports  medicine  community  on  the  proper  practices  for  diagnosis  and  management  of  sport-­‐related  concussion  [7].  As  a  result,  there  is  a  need  for  a  valid  and  standardized  protocol  for  the  recognition,  response,  and  management  of  sport-­‐related  concussion  to  be  widely  adopted  by  those  in  the  BC  sporting  community.  

Page 6: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 6  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

This  initiative  provides  the  opportunity  to  evaluate  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  [www.cattonline.com]  online  course  for  Coaches  as  an  educational  resource,  in  order  to  improve  concussion  awareness,  management,  and  prevention.  

Rationale  

The  failure  to  appropriately  recognize  sport-­‐related  concussion  may  be  due  to  a  lack  of  a  well-­‐accepted  and  standardized  approach  for  the  recognition  of  signs  and  symptoms  of  a  concussion  [8].  While  few  research  studies  have  focused  specifically  on  concussion  in  young  athletes,  studies  have  found  that  age  and  developmental  factors  play  a  role  in  recovery  from  concussive  brain  injury,  with  longer  recovery  times  expected  amongst  young  patients  as  compared  to  adults  [9].  A  valid  and  standardized  protocol  for  recognizing,  responding  to,  and  managing  concussion  in  young  athletes  has  yet  to  be  widely  adopted  by  the  sporting  community.  

The  Canadian  Paediatric  Society  recommends  that  anyone  working  with  children  should  be  educated  on  the  signs  and  symptoms  of  concussion  and  the  appropriate  management  of  a  child  with  a  concussion  [10].  Research  has  shown  that  children  benefit  from  a  controlled,  gradual  return-­‐to-­‐school  process  following  a  concussion.  A  similar  stepwise  return-­‐to-­‐sport  process  is  recommended  for  children  as  they  return  to  physical  activity  following  a  concussion.  Not  following  a  stepwise  process  when  returning  to  normal  functioning  can  result  in  a  child’s  symptoms  being  prolonged,  and  if  a  subsequent  head  injury  is  sustained,  can  lead  to  further  complications.  

This  project  aims  to  evaluate  the  effectiveness  of  CATT  for  Coaches  as  an  educational  concussion  training  resource  for  BC  Hockey  team  officials.  

Impact:  Adoption  of  a  standardized  protocol  for  the  recognition,  treatment,  and  management  of  concussion  has  the  potential  to  reduce  adverse  outcomes  as  a  result  of  a  concussion,  and  decrease  risks  associated  with  returning  to  sport  too  soon  following  a  concussion.  This  initiative  has  the  potential  of  reducing  long-­‐term  health  care  costs  among  these  individuals.  

Objectives  In  partnership  with  BC  Hockey,  the  objectives  of  the  evaluation  of  the  CATT  online  course  for  Coaches  are:  

1. To  assess  the  effectiveness  of  the  online  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  course  for  Coaches  as  an  educational  tool  for  BC  Hockey  team  officials.    

2. To  examine  the  level  of  support  in  mandating  the  CATT  course  for  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players.    

3. To  enhance  the  CATT  website  using  participant  feedback.  

   

Page 7: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 7  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Methods  The  evaluation  focused  on  officials  who  had  completed  the  CATT  online  course  for  coaches  prior  to  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season,  as  mandated  by  BC  Hockey  in  June  2016.  

Inclusion  Criteria:  BC  Hockey  officials  who  completed  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  online  course  for  coaches  prior  to  the  start  of  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season.  

Exclusion  Criteria:  BC  Hockey  officials  who  did  not  completed  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  online  course  for  coaches  prior  to  the  start  of  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season.  

Recruitment:  BC  Hockey  officials  were  recruited  via  email  invitation  (Appendix  A)  sent  out  by  BC  Hockey.  Potential  participants  were  invited  to  participate  in  the  study,  and  directed  to  follow  a  link  to  an  online  survey  (Appendix  B).  

Sample  Size:  In  order  to  obtain  a  representative  sample  size  for  our  population  with  a  margin  of  error  of  5%  and  a  95%  confidence  level,  a  sample  size  of  at  least  375  was  required.  

An  online  survey  was  administered  using  REDCap  (https://projectredcap.org/),  a  secure  browser-­‐based  software.    

Participants  completed  the  survey  in  June  2017,  following  the  completion  of  the  BC  Hockey  league  season.  

Participants  who  completed  the  study  were  entered  into  a  draw  for  an  Apple  Watch,  as  well  as  prizes  provided  by  BC  Hockey.  

 

Data  Analysis  

Data  were  analyzed  to  assess  changes  in  concussion  knowledge  and  attitudes  following  the  CATT  online  training.  Summary  statistics  are  presented.  A  paired  t-­‐test  was  used  to  determine  the  effectiveness  of  the  CATT  training  in  raising  levels  of  concussion  knowledge.  Additionally,  the  level  of  interest  in  extending  the  CATT  training  mandate  to  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players  was  studied  using  both  quantitative  and  qualitative  analysis.  Data  on  differences  in  personal  experience  with  concussion  between  demographic  groups  was  also  studied.  

Page 8: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 8  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Results  A  total  of  1,735  BC  Hockey  officials  responded  to  the  invitation  to  participate  in  this  study.  Of  these,  93.1%  had  visited  the  CATT  website  and  91.7%  had  completed  the  CATT  online  course  for  Coaches  prior  to  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season.  Furthermore,  28.7%  of  survey  respondents  reporting  being  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey  (Table  1).  

A  total  of  1,593  participants  who  completed  the  CATT  online  training  qualified  to  participate  in  this  evaluation,  representing  a  greater  than  10%  response  rate.    

 

BC  Hockey   69.8%  Family/Friend   14.9%  Email/Newsletter   13.2%  Fellow  On-­‐Ice  Official   12.3%  Media  (news,  newspaper,  magazine,  etc.)   4.8%  Internet  Search   2.4%  Poster/Brochure   1.5%  Other   13.0%  

 

 

 

Table  1.  Where  Did  You  Hear  About  CATT  Prior  to  its  Mandate  by  BC  Hockey?    (Multiple  Answers  Possible;  N=463)  

Page 9: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 9  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Demographics  

BC  Hockey  officials  were  represented  in  this  study  by  67%  self-­‐identifying  as  male  and  30%  self-­‐identifying  as  female  (Table  2).  Fewer  than  five  respondents  self-­‐identified  as  non-­‐binary,  and  3%  of  respondents  did  not  answer  the  question.  Responses  by  all  participants  are  represented  in  the  following  results,  with  the  exception  of  data  cross-­‐tabulated  by  gender.    

Of  all  participants  who  responded  to  the  demographic  questions,  50%  were  25-­‐44  years  of  age  (Table  3),  roughly  one  third  had  2-­‐4  years  of  experience  as  a  hockey  official  (Table  4),  and  76%  identified  as  having  personally  dealt  with  or  known  someone  who  has  suffered  a  concussion  (Table  5).  

 

Participant  Demographics  (N=1,593)

Table  2:  Self-­‐Identified  Gender*  

Male   66.6%  Female   30.4%  Non-­‐Binary   2.8%  

Table  3:  Age  of  Participants  

18-­‐24   1.6%  25-­‐44   50.0%  45-­‐64   44.8%  65+   0.8%  Missing   2.8%  

 

Table  4:  Years  as  a  Hockey  Official  

1   13.9%  2  to  4   32.3%  5  to  10   30.6%  >10   19.8%  Missing   3.5%  

Table  5:  Experience  with  Concussion  

Yes   76.1%  No   21.0%  Missing   2.8%  

 

 

*:  Fewer  than  five  respondents  self-­‐identified  as  non-­‐binary,  and  were  therefore  not  included  in  any  data  relating  to  self-­‐identified  gender  only.  Non-­‐binary  respondent  data  was  included  in  all  other  results.    

Page 10: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 10  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Knowledge  

The  following  section  presents  self-­‐reported  concussion  knowledge  score  results  before  and  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course  for  Coaches,  as  captured  by  question  K1  (Appendix  C).  

When  asked  to  rate  their  level  of  concussion  knowledge  on  a  scale  from  1  to  5,  where  1  is  “Minimal  Knowledge”  and  5  is  “Very  Knowledgeable”,  before  and  after  completing  the  CATT  training,  concussion  knowledge  scores  were  found  to  be  statistically  significantly  higher  after  completing  the  CATT  training  (p<0.001).  Before  completing  the  CATT  training,  only  34.3%  of  officials  were  scoring  their  concussion  knowledge  at  a  4  or  higher,  whereas  after  completing  the  training,  92.9%  of  officials  rated  their  concussion  knowledge  at  a  4  or  higher  (Figure  1,  Table  6).  

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concussion  Knowledge  Pre-­‐CATT  Median  Score  

Post-­‐CATT  Median  Score  

P-­‐value  

Knowledge  Change  (N=1,593)   3.14   4.3   p<0.001  

 

Figure  1.  Comparison  of  self-­‐reported  concussion  knowledge  scores  before  and  after  completing  the  CATT  training.  

Table  6.  Median  concussion  knowledge  scores  before  and  after  completing  the  CATT  training,  and  p-­‐value  for  paired  t-­‐test  change  in  concussion  knowledge.    

How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  (a)  prior  to,  and  (b)  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  (N=1,593)    

Page 11: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 11  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Attitudes  

The  following  section  presents  participant  attitudes  towards  different  aspects  of  the  CATT  training  (Appendix  C).  

Responses  to  questions  A1-­‐A4  were  given  on  a  scale  from  1  to  5,  where  1  was  “Not  at  all”  and  5  was  “Very”.  

A1-­‐A4:  When  examining  results  for  the  relevance  (Figure  2),  organization  (Figure  3),  and  overall  satisfaction  regarding  the  CATT  material  (Figure  4),  as  well  as  likelihood  of  recommending  the  CATT  training  to  others  (Figure  5),  satisfaction  scores  were  high  for  all  categories,  with  all  categories  having  greater  than  84%  of  respondents  scoring  a  satisfaction  score  of  at  least  4.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A1.  How  relevant  is  the  material  included  in  the  CATT  online  course?  (N=1,575)    

Figure  2.  Level  of  satisfaction  regarding  the  relevance  of  material  included  in  the  CATT  course.  

Page 12: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 12  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

 

A2.  How  well  organized  is  the  information  covered  in  the  CATT  online  course?  (N=1,575)    

A3.  How  satisfied  are  you  with  the  CATT  online  course  overall?  (N=1,575)    

Figure  3.  Level  of  satisfaction  regarding  the  organization  of  information  in  the  CATT  course.  

Figure  4.  Level  of  overall  satisfaction  with  the  CATT  course.  

Page 13: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 13  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

A4.  How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  (N=1,575)    

Figure  5.  Likelihood  of  recommending  the  CATT  course  to  others.  

Page 14: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 14  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

A5:  When  judging  the  amount  of  information  included  in  the  CATT  training,  most  respondents  were  in  agreement  that  an  appropriate  amount  of  information  is  included  in  the  course.  A  similar  proportion  of  respondents  felt  that  the  course  included  ‘too  little’  (7%)  or  ‘too  much’  (5%)  information    (Figure  6).  

A6:  The  amount  of  time  spent  completing  the  CATT  training  was  found  to  be  appropriate  for  a  large  portion  of  respondents,  as  the  online  course  requires  a  minimum  

of  30  minutes  to  1  hour  to  complete  (Figure  7).  Furthermore,  a  considerable  number  of  respondents  reported  spending  more  than  an  hour  on  the  CATT  website,  which  may  indicate  further  exploration  of  the  CATT  resources,  while  only  a  small  number  of  respondents  reported  spending  less  time  than  the  minimum  time  required.  Many  respondents  commented  that  they  did  not  remember  the  amount  of  time  they  spent  completing  the  concussion  training,  as  this  training  had  taken  place  several  months  prior  to  the  survey.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A5.  How  would  you  rate  the  amount  of  information  covered  in  the  CATT  online  course?  (N=1,565)  

A6.  How  much  time  did  you  spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  (N=1,565)  

 

Figure  6.  Evaluation  of  the  amount  of  information  covered  in  the  CATT  course.  

Figure  7.  Amount  of  time  spent  completing  the  CATT  training.  

Page 15: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 15  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

A7:  Participants  were  asked  whether  they  experienced  a  situation  during  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season  where  a  player  sustained  a  possible  concussion.  The  majority  of  officials  did  report  experiencing  a  possible  concussion  situation  this  past  season  (Figure  8).  

A8:  For  those  who  had  experienced  a  possible  concussion  situation  during  the  2016-­‐2017  season,  a  large  majority  stated  that  the  CATT  prepared  them  to  handle  the  situation  appropriately  (85%),  while  a  very  small  proportion  of  participants  felt  that  the  CATT  training  did  not  at  all  prepare  them  to  handle  the  situation  (2%)  (Figure  9).  Many  of  those  who  reported  feeling  only  somewhat  prepared  to  handle  such  a  situation  appropriately  suggested  that  a  quick  reference  guide  to  the  protocol  would  have  been  beneficial.  

A9:  When  respondents  were  asked  whether  the  CATT  training  raised  awareness  and  knowledge  on  concussion,  91%  of  participants  answered  “Yes”,  while  7%  answered  “I  don’t  know”  (Figure  10).    

A10:  When  asked  whether  a  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  the  CATT  training  for  the  parents  of  players,  68%  were  in  favour,  with  15%  against  a  potential  mandate  (Figure  11).  Many  of  those  who  were  against  a  CATT  mandate  for  parents  stated  that  the  burden  of  the  time  commitment  to  complete  the  course,  and  administrative  challenges  surrounding  such  a  requirement  as  reasons  against  a  mandate  for  parents.  Comments  were  made  both  in  favour  of  parents  understanding  more  about  the  mandated  response  to  potential  concussion  situations  (e.g.  why  their  child  is  being  taken  off  the  ice),  as  well  as  against  increasing  parents’  knowledge  in  this  area  (e.g.  parents  may  try  to  have  other  children  taken  off  the  ice  to  give  their  own  child  an  advantage).    

   

                     

     

   A7.  During  the  2016-­‐2017  season,  did  you  

experience  a  situation  where  a  player  sustained  a  possible  concussion?  (N=1,565)  

 

A8.  Did  the  CATT  online  course  prepare  you  to  handle  the  situation  appropriately?  (N=891)  

 

Figure  8.  Proportion  of  officials  who  dealt  with  a  possible  concussion  situation  during  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season.  

Figure  9.  Level  of  preparedness  for  handling  a  possible  concussion  situation  acquired  through  completing  the  CATT  training.    

Page 16: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 16  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

                       

               

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

A10.  Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  (N=1,553)  

 

 

Figure  10.  Attitude  regarding  whether  the  BC  Hockey  mandated  concussion  training  resulted  in  an  increase  of  concussion  awareness  and  knowledge.  

Figure  11.  Attitude  regarding  mandating  the  CATT  training  for  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players.  

A9.  Do  you  think  that  the  concussion  training  mandated  by  BC  Hockey  has  raised  awareness  and  knowledge  on  concussion  recognition  and  management?  (N=1,553)  

 

 

Page 17: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 17  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Notable  Cross-­‐Tabulations  

The  following  section  presents  some  of  the  notable  results  obtained  from  cross-­‐tabulations  of  the  data  collected  (Appendix  D).  Cross-­‐tabulations  were  performed  comparing  response  rates  for  all  survey  questions  by  the  following:  

• Age  • Self-­‐identified  gender*  • Years  involved  as  a  hockey  official  • Experience  with  concussion  (self  or  other)  • Time  spent  completing  the  CATT  online  course  • Awareness  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  to  the  mandate  by  BC  Hockey  

 *:  Fewer  than  five  respondents  self-­‐identified  as  non-­‐binary,  and  were  therefore  not  included  in  any  data  relating  to  self-­‐identified  gender  only.  Non-­‐binary  respondent  data  was  included  in  all  other  results.    

CT1:  Comparing  the  likelihood  of  recommending  the  CATT  training  to  others  by  age  or  respondents,  participants  in  the  65+  age  group  were  most  likely  to  recommend  the  CATT  concussion  training  to  others,  as  compared  to  other  age  groups.  It  should  be  noted  that  the  number  of  respondents  in  the  65+  age  group  was  small  (n=12)  compared  to  the  other  age  groups  (Figure  12).  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  CT1.  How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  *  What  is  your  age?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,549)  

 

Figure  12.  Comparison  of  the  likelihood  of  recommending  the  CATT  course  to  others,  by  age  of  team  official.  

Page 18: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 18  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

CT2:  Concussion  knowledge  scores  were  virtually  identical  between  males  and  females  before  completing  the  CATT  training  (Figure  13a).  After  the  training  was  completed,  however,  female  participants  scored  their  concussion  knowledge  higher  as  compared  to  males  (Figure  13b).  A  chi-­‐square  test  found  that  although  there  was  no  significant  difference  in  concussion  knowledge  scores  between  genders  prior  to  completing  the  CATT  training,  female  officials  had  significantly  higher  scores  after  completing  the  concussion  training  (p<0.02).  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  CT2.  How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  (a)  prior  to,  and  (b)  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,548)  

 

Figure  13a.  Comparison  of  self-­‐reported  concussion  knowledge  scores  before  completing  the  CATT  training,  by  gender  of  team  official.*  

Figure  13b.  Comparison  of  self-­‐reported  concussion  knowledge  scores  after  completing  the  CATT  training,  by  gender  of  team  official.*  

CT2.  How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  (a)  prior  to,  and  (b)  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,548)  

 

Page 19: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 19  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

CT3:  Female  participants  were  more  likely  to  recommend  the  CATT  training  to  others  as  compared  to  males,  although  both  gender  groups  are  likely  to  recommend  the  training,  with  greater  than  83%  of  respondents  in  both  groups  scoring  a  4  or  higher  for  this  question  (Figure  14).  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure  14.  Comparison  of  the  likelihood  of  recommending  the  CATT  course  to  others,  by  gender  of  team  official.*  

CT3.  How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  Crosstabulation  (N=1,548)  

 

Page 20: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 20  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

CT4:  Comparing  the  level  of  interest  in  mandating  the  CATT  training  for  parents  by  gender  of  respondents,  female  participants  were  notably  more  in  favour  of  a  mandate  for  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players  than  males  (Figure  15).  A  chi-­‐square  text  found  that  female  participants  were  significantly  more  in  favour  of  extending  the  CATT  training  mandate  to  parents,  as  compared  to  males  (p<0.002).  

CT4.  Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  Crosstabulation  (N=1,548)  

 

Figure  15.  Comparison  of  interest  in  mandating  the  CATT  training  for  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players,  by  gender  of  team  official.*  

Page 21: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 21  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

CT5:  A  notably  higher  proportion  of  male  respondents  reported  experiencing  concussion,  whether  it  be  themselves  or  someone  close  to  them  having  dealt  with  a  concussion,  as  compared  to  females  (83%  compared  to  68%)  (Figure  16).  A  chi-­‐square  test  found  this  difference  in  personal  experience  with  concussion  by  self-­‐identified  gender  to  be  significant  (p<0.001).  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CT5.  Have  you  or  someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  concussion?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,545)  

 

Figure  16.  Comparison  of  experience  with  concussion,  by  gender  of  team  official.*  

Page 22: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 22  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

CT6:  Concussion  knowledge  scores  compared  by  years  involved  as  a  hockey  official  show  that  respondents  with  less  experience  as  hockey  officials  reported  significantly  lower  concussion  knowledge  scores  as  compared  to  more  experienced  officials  before  taking  the  CATT  training  (p<0.001)  (Figure  17a).  Meanwhile,  no  significant  difference  was  observed  between  groups  after  completing  the  training  (Figure  17b).  

CT7:  A  steady  increase  was  observed  in  the  proportion  of  respondents  who  have  experienced  concussion  (themselves  or  someone  close  to  them)  as  the  years  of  involvement  as  a  hockey  official  increases  (Figure  18).  Participants  in  the  5  to  10  year  experience  group  showed  a  greater  than  20%  higher  proportion  of  respondents  who  had  experienced  concussion  than  those  in  the  1  year  experience  group  (90%  compared  to  70%).  Statistical  analysis  determined  that  a  significantly  higher  proportion  of  more  experienced  participants  have  dealt  with  a  concussion  first  hand,  as  compared  to  those  with  fewer  years  involved  in  hockey  (p<0.001).  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 CT6.  How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  (a)  prior  to,  and  (b)  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,538)  

 

Figure  17a.  Comparison  of  self-­‐reported  concussion  knowledge  scores  before  completing  the  CATT  training,  by  team  official’s  years  involved  as  a  hockey  official.  

Page 23: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 23  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Figure  17b.  Comparison  of  self-­‐reported  concussion  knowledge  scores  after  completing  the  CATT  training,  by  team  official’s  years  involved  as  a  hockey  official.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure  18.  Comparison  of  experience  with  concussion,  by  team  official’s  years  involved  as  a  hockey  official.    

CT7.  Have  you  or  someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  concussion?  *  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,535)  

 

CT6.  How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  (a)  prior  to,  and  (b)  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,538)  

 

Page 24: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 24  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

CT8:  Those  participants  who  spent  more  time  completing  the  CATT  training  reported  that  they  felt  that  the  CATT  prepared  them  to  appropriately  handle  a  potential  concussion  experienced  during  the  2016-­‐2017  hockey  season  (Figure  19).  Over  84%  of  respondents  who  spent  30  minutes  or  longer  completing  the  training  felt  that  the  CATT  prepared  them  to  handle  situation,  while  less  than  72%  of  those  who  spent  under  30  minutes  completing  the  training  felt  that  they  were  prepared.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

CT8.  Did  the  CATT  online  course  prepare  you  to  handle  the  situation  appropriately?  *  How  much  time  did  you  spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=891)  

 

Figure  19.  Comparison  of  level  of  preparedness  for  handling  a  possible  concussion  situation  acquired  through  completing  the  CATT  training,  by  amount  of  time  spent  completing  the  CATT  training.  

Page 25: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 25  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

CT9:  Comparing  the  level  of  interest  in  mandating  the  CATT  training  for  the  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players  by  whether  a  respondent  was  aware  of  the  CATT  prior  to  the  BC  Hockey  mandate,  those  who  were  aware  of  the  training  prior  to  its  mandate  had  a  higher  level  of  interest  in  extending  the  CATT  mandate  to  parents  (74%  compared  to  66%;  Figure  20).  Statistical  analysis  determined  that  this  difference  in  interest  in  mandating  the  CATT  training  for  parents  by  awareness  of  CATT  prior  to  the  BC  Hockey  mandate  for  team  officials  was  significant  (p<0.001).              

 

 

 

                               

CT9.  Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  *  Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  Cross-­‐tabulation  (N=1,553)    *:  Fewer  than  five  respondents  self-­‐identified  as  non-­‐binary,  and  were  therefore  not  included  in  any  data  relating  to  self-­‐identified  gender  only.  Non-­‐binary  respondent  data  was  included  in  all  other  results.    

Figure  20.  Comparison  of  interest  in  mandating  the  CATT  training  for  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players,  by  awareness  of  CATT  prior  to  BC  Hockey  mandate  for  team  officials.  

Page 26: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 26  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Participant  Feedback  

Common  themes  gathered  from  participant  feedback  include:  

1) General  Suggestions/Feedback  

• Access  to  a  quick  reference  sheet,  checklist,  or  other  form  of  printed  material  summarizing  the  concussion  protocol  would  be  valuable,  as  it  could  be  easily  carried  on  the  bench.  

• Include  a  downloadable  package  of  resources  such  as  on  Return  to  Sport  and  Return  to  School  tool  after  the  course  has  been  completed.  

• Create  a  system  that  notifies  the  minor  hockey  association  once  the  mandated  CATT  training  has  been  completed  by  an  official.  

• An  annual  refresher  course  to  ensure  that  the  information  covered  in  the  CATT  remains  fresh  and  easy  to  recall  in  case  they  need  to  be  applied  during  the  season.  

 

 

• Creating  a  course  that  is  required  to  be  taken  by  players  above  a  certain  age  (e.g.,  those  12  years  and  older)  would  allow  them  the  opportunity  to  understand  the  importance  of  following  concussion  protocol  properly  for  recovery.  

• Concussion  training  should  be  implemented  as  a  requirement  for  officials  from  other  sports  organizations  in  British  Columbia  (soccer,  football,  figure  skating,  etc).  

 

“I  had  an  understanding  of  what  to  look  for…a  quick  reference  easy  access  guide  would  be  really  helpful.  Or  a  quick  access  checklist.”  

—Survey  Participant    

2) Opinions  on  CATT  online  course  

• Situational  questions  included  in  the  course  were  very  helpful.  Including  more  would  further  help  understanding  how  to  handle  different  types  of  in-­‐game  situations.  

• Shortening  the  course  by  reducing  repetitive  and  unnecessarily  content  could  support  the  officials  in  remaining  focused  throughout  the  training.  

• There  is  some  level  of  uncertainty  as  to  who  has  authority  to  decide  to  sit  out  a  player  when  there  is  a  disagreement  between  another  coach  or  parent.  

• Information  included  in  the  protocol  remains  unclear  for  situations  when  a  concussion  is  not  evident.  In  these  cases,  it  is  unclear  what  to  do,  and  the  protocol  appears  overly  cautious.  

 

 

“I  feel  that  this  is  an  extremely  eye  opening  and  informative  training  tool.”  

-­‐Survey  Participant    

 

“Very  informative  and  empowering.  Concussion  protocol  is  keeping  kids  safe  and  improving  quality  of  hockey  and  future  enjoyment  of  players.”  

-­‐Survey  Participant  

Page 27: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 27  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

3) Opinions  on  a  CATT  Mandate  for  Parents  

• A  mandate  for  parents  would  be  valuable  in  ensuring  that  they  have  an  understanding  of  the  existing  protocol  that  has  been  implemented  for  officials.  

• Requiring  the  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players  to  complete  the  CATT  training  would  place  a  burden  on  the  parents  and  may  results  in  fewer  players  involved  with  BC  Hockey.  

• Requiring  the  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players  to  complete  the  CATT  training  would  involve  administrative  challenges  in  ensuring  that  it  is  being  completed  by  all  parents.  

• Mandating  the  training  for  parents  would  cause  the  parents  to  become  overly  involved  in  the  decisions  of  officials  when  following  concussion  protocol.  

• Creating  a  course  for  parents  that  is  largely  centered  around  the  management  of  concussion  at  home  would  be  beneficial.  

• Making  the  course  widely  available  and  recommended  to  parents  is  sufficient;  a  mandate  for  all  parents  is  not  necessary.  

 

 

     

 

“I  would  like  to  see  parents  take  the  course  so  they  understand  the  decision  of  the  Safety  person.”  

-­‐Survey  Participant    

 

“We  want  more  kids  to  play.  Adding  more  requirements  and  time  commitments  is  just  another  barrier  to  entry  regardless  of  content.”  

-­‐Survey  Participant  

Page 28: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 28  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Discussion  Concussion  has  become  a  widely  discussed  health  issue  in  recent  years,  particularly  within  the  sporting  community,  as  the  level  of  awareness  and  amount  of  concussion-­‐based  research  has  increased  over  the  past  several  years.  With  the  rates  of  reported  head  injuries  increasing  over  the  past  decade,  there  is  a  need  for  a  valid  and  standardized  protocol  for  the  recognition,  response,  and  management  of  sport-­‐related  concussion.  

Based  on  established  evidence-­‐based  research  principles,  the  aim  of  the  CATT  is  to  standardize  the  protocol  for  the  recognition,  response,  management,  and  prevention  of  concussion.  The  CATT  for  Coaches  provides  up-­‐to-­‐date  education  concussion  training  in  the  form  of:  

• Online  course  for  coaches  • The  Concussion  Response  Tool  (smartphone  accessible  and  fillable)  • The  Return  to  Sport  tool  • Situational  and  knowledge-­‐based  questions  • Frequently  asked  questions  • Printable  handouts,  related  websites,  journal  articles,  and  additional  resources  

 

The  CATT  for  Parents,  Players  and  Coaches  was  originally  launched  in  2014  (www.cattonline.com),  and  was  actively  disseminated  provincially  and  nationally  via  presentations  to  committees  and  sports  organizations;  newsletters  and  websites;  cards  distributed  to  private  clinics;  posters  distributed  to  sporting  organizations,  regional  health  authorities,  community  centres  and  other  locations  in  the  Lower  Mainland  and  through  regional  health  authorities;  and  posters  presented  at  conference  presentations.  

On  June  27,  2016,  at  the  BC  Hockey  AGM,  the  CATT  for  Coaches  training  was  approved  and  mandated  as  a  training  resource  to  be  completed  by  all  team  officials  prior  to  their  participation  in  the  2016-­‐2017  season.  

This  evaluation  of  the  CATT  online  course  for  Coaches  found  that  the  training  led  to  a  significant  increase  in  self-­‐reported  concussion  knowledge  amongst  BC  Hockey  team  officials.  A  large  majority  of  BC  Hockey  officials  felt  that  the  CATT  training  prepared  them  to  handle  a  potential  concussion  situation  experienced  during  the  2016-­‐2017  season  appropriately.  Overall,  officials  reported  being  in  favour  of  extending  the  CATT  mandate  to  the  parents  of  BC  Hockey  players.  

Policy  supporting  the  adoption  of  the  CATT  amongst  other  sporting  organizations  throughout  BC  will  allow  for  a  more  widespread  understanding  of  proper  protocol  for  concussion  recognition,  treatment,  management,  and  prevention.  This,  in  turn,  may  reduce  related  short  and  long-­‐term  health  problems,  lowering  total  health  care  costs  among  these  individuals.  

Limitations  

This  was  a  questionnaire-­‐based  study  collecting  self-­‐reported  data  from  BC  Hockey  team  officials  who  self-­‐selected  to  participate.  Self-­‐reported  data  may  be  biased  for  knowledge  and  attitude  questions,  as  these  questions  may  be  affected  by  socials  bias,  with  participants  answering  questions  how  they  believe  they  should  be  answered  rather  than  their  personal  reality.  

Furthermore,  the  concepts  of  ‘knowledge’  and  ‘attitude’  are  difficult  to  objectively  measure.  Particularly  for  those  questions  where  participants  were  asked  to  answer  using  a  Likert-­‐scale  (from  1  to  5.  This  survey  tool  was  not  tested  beyond  face  validity  due  to  limited  resources  and  the  expectation  that  the  questionnaire  would  not  be  used  beyond  the  purposes  of  this  evaluation.  

Page 29: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 29  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Next  Steps  

• Update  CATT  resources  to  incorporate  the  5th  International  Consensus  Statement  on  Concussion  in  Sport.  

• Further  explore  the  value  of  mandating  concussion  training  for  parents  of  players  with  BC  Hockey  

• Continue  to  engage  in  social  marketing  to  raise  awareness  and  knowledge  among  British  Columbians  of  the  severity  and  consequences  of  concussion.  

• Integrate  survey  feedback  into  CATT  website  to  enhance  the  training  tool.  

   

Page 30: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 30  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

References  [1]  BC  Hockey.  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool.  Posted  June  27,  2016.  

[2]  Government  of  Canada.  Concussions.  Posted  June  21,  2017.  

[3]  McCory,  P,  Meeuwisse,  WH,  Dvořák,  J,  et  al.  Consensus  statement  on  concussion  in  sport—the  5th  international  conference  on  concussion  in  sport  held  in  Berlin,  October  2016.  British  Journal  of  Sports  Medicine  2017;51(11):838-­‐847.  

[4]  Daneshvar,  DH,  Riley,  DO,  Nowinski,  CJ,  McKee,  AC,  Stern,  RA,  Cantu,  RC.  Long-­‐Term  Consequences:  Effects  on  Normal  Development  Profile  After  Concussion.  Physical  Medicine  and  Rehabilitation  Clinics  of  North  America  2011;22(4):683-­‐700.  

[5]  Yard,  EE,  Comstock,  RD.  Compliance  with  return  to  play  guidelines  following  concussion  in  US  high  school  athletes,  2005-­‐2008.  Brain  Injury  2009;23(11):888-­‐898.  

[6]  Echlin  P.  Concussion  education,  identification,  and  treatment  within  a  prospective  study  of  physician  observed  junior  ice  hockey  concussions:  social  context  of  this  scientific  intervention.  Neurosurgical  Focus  2010;29(5):E7.1-­‐13.  

[7]  Ghajar,  J.  Commentary:  Statements  of  Agreement  from  the  Targeted  Evaluation  and  Active  Management  (TEAM)  Approaches  to  Treating  Concussion  Meeting  Held  in  Pittsburgh,  October  15-­‐16,  2015.  Neurosurgery  2016;79(6):930.  

[8]  Echlin  PS,  Johnson  AM,  Riverin  S,  Tator  CH,  Cantu  RC,  Cusimano  MD,  Taunton  JE,  Upshur  RE,  Hall  CR,  Forwell  LA,  Skopelja  EN.  A  prospective  study  of  concussion  education  in  2  junior  ice  hockey  teams:  implications  for  sports  concussion  education.  Neurosurgical  Focus,  2010;29(5):E6.1-­‐4.  

[9]  Meehan,  WP,  Taylor,  AM,  Proctor,  M.  The  Pediatric  Athlete:  Younger  Athletes  with  Sport-­‐Related  Concussion.  Clinics  in  Sports  Medicine  2011:30(1):133-­‐144.  

[10]  Purcell  LK,  CPS  Healthy  Active  Living  and  Sports  Medicine  Committee,  Abridged  version:  Paediatric  Child  Health  2012;17(1):31.

   

Page 31: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 31  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Appendices  Appendix  A—Email  Introduction  ...........................................................................................  32  

Appendix  B—CATT  Evaluation  Survey  ...................................................................................  33  

Appendix  C—Results  Tables  ..................................................................................................  36  Awareness  ................................................................................................................................  36  Attitudes  ...................................................................................................................................  38  Demographics    ..........................................................................................................................  41  

Appendix  D—Results  Tables  for  Notable  Cross-­‐Tabulations  ..................................................  43    

   

Page 32: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 32  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Appendix  A—Email  Introduction    Dr.  Shelina  Babul  at  the  University  of  British  Columbia,  in  partnership  with  BC  Hockey,  is  evaluating  the  concussion  educational  training  mandated  by  BC  Hockey  last  year.  BC  Hockey  announced  in  June,  2016,  at  their  AGM  held  in  Sun  Peaks,  BC,  that  all  BC  Hockey  team  officials  are  required  to  complete  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  prior  to  their  participation  in  any  practice  or  games  starting  the  2016–2017  hockey  season.    

We  are  requesting  that  any  individuals  who  have  completed  this  concussion  training  complete  a  short  online  questionnaire  with  a  time  commitment  of  approximately  5-­‐10  minutes.    

All  participants  who  qualify  and  complete  the  questionnaire  will  be  entered  into  a  draw  for  an  Apple  Watch,  as  well  as  various  clothing  items  from  BC  Hockey.  

All  responses  will  be  anonymous.    

Your  email  address  will  be  kept  confidential  and  used  only  to  enter  you  in  the  prize  draw.  

Please  follow  this  link  to  complete  the  questionnaire:  Evaluation  of  BC  Hockey  Mandated  Concussion  Training.  

If  the  link  above  does  not  work,  try  copying  the  link  below  into  your  web  browser:  

https://rc.cfri.ca/redcap/surveys/?s=D7CEJAYPFD  

If  you  have  any  questions  about  this  study,  or  require  further  information,  please  contact  the  project  co-­‐ordinator  Kate  Turcotte  at  [email protected].  

Thank  you  very  much  for  your  time  and  consideration.  Your  feedback  will  allow  us  to  improve  concussion  education  and  awareness  in  British  Columbia.    

Page 33: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 33  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Appendix  B—CATT  Evaluation  Survey    1.  Have  you  visited  the  website  for  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  for  Parents,  Players  &  Coaches  (www.cattonline.com)?  

• Yes  • No  

[If  “No”  for  Q1:  survey  is  terminated  and  no  further  information  will  be  collected:  “Thank  you  for  taking  the  time  and  responding  to  our  survey.”]  

 2.  Did  you  complete  the  CATT  for  Coaches  online  course  prior  to  the  2016-­‐2017  season?  

• Yes  • No    

[If  “No”  for  Q2:  survey  is  terminated  and  no  further  information  will  be  collected:  “Thank  you  for  taking  the  time  and  responding  to  our  survey.”]  

 3.  Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  

• Yes  • No  

[If  “Yes”  to  Q3:]    

4.  How  did  you  hear  about  the  CATT?  (Select  all  that  apply)  • BC  Hockey  • Fellow  On-­‐Ice  Official  • Poster/Brochure  • Email/Newsletter  • Media  (News,  Newspaper,  Magazine,  etc.)  • Family/Friend  • Internet  Search  • Other  (Text  box)  

 Please  respond  to  the  following  questions  (Questions  5  &  6)  using  a  scale  of  1  to  5,  where  1  is  “Minimal”  and  5  is  “Very  Knowledgeable”    5.  How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  prior  to  completing  the  CATT  online  course?                 1/2/3/4/5    6.  How  much  do  you  now  know  about  concussions  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?                 1/2/3/4/5    Please  respond  to  the  following  questions  (Questions  7  to  10)  using  a  scale  of  1  to  5,  where  1  is  “Not  at  all”  and  5  is  “Very”    7.  How  relevant  is  the  material  included  in  the  CATT  online  course?       1/2/3/4/5        

Page 34: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 34  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

8.  How  well  organized  is  the  information  covered  in  the  CATT  online  course?     1/2/3/4/5    9.  How  satisfied  are  you  with  the  CATT  online  course  overall?  

1/2/3/4/5    10.  How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  

1/2/3/4/5    11.  How  would  you  rate  the  amount  of  information  covered  in  the  CATT  online  course?  

• Too  little  • Too  much  • The  right  amount  

 12.  How  much  time  did  you  spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

• 15-­‐30  minutes    • 30  minutes-­‐1  hour    • 1-­‐2  hours  • 2+  hours  • I  don’t  remember  

 13.  During  the  2016-­‐2017  season,  did  you  experience  a  situation  where  a  player  sustained  a  possible  concussion?  

• Yes  • No  

[If  “Yes”  to  Q13:]    

14.  Did  the  CATT  online  course  prepare  you  to  handle  the  situation  appropriately?  • Yes  • Somewhat  • No  

[If  “Somewhat/No”  to  Q14:]    

15.  How  did  the  CATT  online  course  not  prepare  you  to  handle  the  situation  appropriately?  [Open  ended]  

 16.  Do  you  think  that  the  concussion  training  mandated  by  BC  Hockey  has  raised  awareness  and  knowledge  on  concussion  recognition  and  management?      

[If  “No”  to  Q16:]    17.  If  no,  why  not?  

[Open  ended]    18.  Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  

[If  “No”  to  Q18:]    

Page 35: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 35  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

19.  If  no,  why  not?  [Open  ended]  

 20.  What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  improve  the  CATT  online  course?    

[Open  ended]    21.  Please  share  any  additional  comments  regarding  the  CATT  online  course.  

[Open  ended]    Please  complete  the  demographic  information  below:    What  is  your  age?    

• 18-­‐24  • 25-­‐44  • 45-­‐64  • 65+  

 How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  

• Male  • Female  • Non-­‐binary  

 How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  Hockey  official?  

• 1  • 2-­‐4  • 5-­‐10  • >10  

 Have  you  or  someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  concussion?  

• Yes  • No  

   

Page 36: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 36  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Appendix  C—Results  Tables  

Awareness    

Have  you  visited  the  website  for  the  Concussion  Awareness  Training  Tool  (CATT)  for  Parents,  Players  &  Coaches  (www.cattonline.com)?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   No   120   6.9   6.9   6.9  

Yes   1615   93.0   93.1   100.0  Total   1735   99.9   100.0      

Missing   System   2   0.1          

Total   1737   100.0            

 Did  you  complete  the  CATT  for  Coaches  online  course  prior  to  the  2016-­‐2017  season?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent  

Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   No   144   8.3   8.3   8.3  

Yes   1593   91.7   91.7   100.0  Total   1737   100.0   100.0      

   

Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   No   1152   66.3   71.3   71.3  

Yes   463   26.7   28.7   100.0  Total   1615   93.0   100.0      

Missing   System   122   7.0          

Total   1737   100.0                              

Page 37: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 37  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

How  did  you  hear  about  the  CATT?  (Select  all  that  apply)  Option   Response  Rate  (%)  Other   13  

Internet  search   2.4  Family/friend   14.9  

Media  (news,  newspaper,  magazine,  etc.)   4.8  Email/Newsletter   13.2  Poster/Brochure   1.5  

Fellow  on-­‐ice  official   12.3  BC  Hockey   69.8  

 

Knowledge    

How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  prior  to  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   1  (Minimal)   81   4.7   5.1   5.1  

2   295   17.0   18.5   23.6  3   671   38.6   42.1   65.7  4   412   23.7   25.9   91.6  

5  (Very  Knowledgeable)  

134   7.7   8.4   100.0  

Total   1593   91.7   100.0      Missing   System   144   8.3          

Total   1737   100.0              

How  much  do  you  now  know  about  concussions  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

  Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   1  (Minimal)   1   0.1   0.1   0.1  2   6   0.3   0.4   0.4  3   106   6.1   6.7   7.1  4   879   50.6   55.2   62.3  

5  (Very  Knowledgeable)  

601   34.6   37.7   100.0  

Total   1593   91.7   100.0      Missing   System   144   8.3        

Total   1737   100.0          

Page 38: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

  38  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Attitudes    

How  relevant  is  the  material  included  in  the  CATT  online  course?       Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  

Percent  Valid   1  (Not  at  

all)  3   0.2   0.2   0.2  

2   12   0.7   0.8   1.0  3   122   7.0   7.7   8.7  4   656   37.8   41.7   50.3  

5  (Very)   782   45.0   49.7   100.0  Total   1575   90.7   100.0      

Missing   System   162   9.3          Total   1737   100.0          

 How  well  organized  is  the  information  covered  in  the  CATT  online  course?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   1  (Not  at  all)  

3   0.2   0.2   0.2  

2   10   0.6   0.6   0.8  3   109   6.3   6.9   7.7  4   756   43.5   48.0   55.7  

5  (Very)   697   40.1   44.3   100.0  

Total   1575   90.7   100.0      Missing   System   162   9.3          

Total   1737   100.0            

How  satisfied  are  you  with  the  CATT  online  course  overall?       Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  

Percent  Valid   1  (Not  at  

all)  6   0.3   0.4   0.4  

2   32   1.8   2.0   2.4  3   143   8.2   9.1   11.5  4   704   40.5   44.7   56.2  

5  (Very)   690   39.7   43.8   100.0  Total   1575   90.7   100.0      

Missing   System   162   9.3          Total   1737   100.0          

     

Page 39: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 39  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   1  (Not  at  all)  

18   1.0   1.1   1.1  

2   42   2.4   2.7   3.8  3   186   10.7   11.8   15.6  4   548   31.5   34.8   50.4  

5  (Very)   781   45.0   49.6   100.0  

Total   1575   90.7   100.0      Missing   System   162   9.3          

Total   1737   100.0            

How  would  you  rate  the  amount  of  information  covered  in  the  CATT  online  course?       Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  

Percent  

Valid   Too  little   114   6.6   7.3   7.3  

Too  much   73   4.2   4.7   11.9  The  right  amount  

1378   79.3   88.1   100.0  

Total   1565   90.1   100.0      Missing   System   172   9.9          

Total   1737   100.0            

How  much  time  did  you  spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?       Frequency   Percent   Valid  

Percent  Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   15-­‐30  minutes   141   8.1   9.0   9.0  

30  minutes-­‐1  hour  

553   31.8   35.3   44.3  

1-­‐2  hours   257   14.8   16.4   60.8  

2+  hours   64   3.7   4.1   64.9  I  dont  

remember  550   31.7   35.1   100.0  

Total   1565   90.1   100.0      Missing   System   172   9.9          

Total   1737   100.0                  

Page 40: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 40  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

During  the  2016-­‐2017  season,  did  you  experience  a  situation  where  a  player  sustained  a  possible  concussion?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   No   674   38.8   43.1   43.1  Yes   891   51.3   56.9   100.0  Total   1565   90.1   100.0      

Missing   System   172   9.9          Total   1737   100.0          

 Did  the  CATT  online  course  prepare  you  to  handle  the  situation  appropriately?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   Yes   755   43.5   84.7   84.7  Somewhat   123   7.1   13.8   98.5  

No   13   0.7   1.5   100.0  Total   891   51.3   100.0      

Missing   System   846   48.7          Total   1737   100.0          

 Do  you  think  that  the  concussion  training  mandated  by  BC  Hockey  has  raised  awareness  

and  knowledge  on  concussion  recognition  and  management?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   Yes   1420   81.8   91.4   91.4  

No   23   1.3   1.5   92.9  I  dont  know  

110   6.3   7.1   100.0  

Total   1553   89.4   100.0      Missing   System   184   10.6          

Total   1737   100.0            

Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent  

Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   Yes   1063   61.2   68.4   68.4  No   230   13.2   14.8   83.3  

I  dont  know  

260   15.0   16.7   100.0  

Total   1553   89.4   100.0      Missing   System   184   10.6          

Total   1737   100.0          

Page 41: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 41  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Demographics      

 

 How  do  you  self-­‐identify?**  

  Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent  

Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   Male   1061   68.6   68.6   68.6  Female   485   31.4   31.4   100.0  Total   1546   100.0   100.0    

 How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  

    Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  Percent  

Valid   1   221   12.7   14.4   14.4  

2  to  4   514   29.6   33.4   47.8  5  to  10   488   28.1   31.7   79.5  >10   315   18.1   20.5   100.0  Total   1538   88.5   100.0      

Missing   System   199   11.5          Total   1737   100.0          

                         

What  is  your  age?       Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  

Percent  Valid   18-­‐24   26   1.5   1.7   1.7  

25-­‐44   798   45.9   51.5   53.2  45-­‐64   713   41.0   46.0   99.2  65+   12   0.7   0.8   100.0  Total   1549   89.2   100.0      

Missing   System   188   10.8          Total   1737   100.0          

Page 42: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 42  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Have  you  or  someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  concussion?       Frequency   Percent   Valid  Percent   Cumulative  

Percent  Valid   No   335   19.3   21.6   21.6  

Yes   1213   69.8   78.4   100.0  Total   1548   89.1   100.0      

Missing   System   189   10.9          Total   1737   100.0          

   *:  For  options  with  fewer  than  five  respondents,  these  frequencies  were  removed  from  results  tables  to  ensure  that  no  participants  are  identifiable.    **:  Fewer  than  five  respondents  self-­‐identified  as  non-­‐binary,  and  were  therefore  not  included  in  any  data  relating  to  self-­‐identified  gender  only.  Non-­‐binary  respondent  data  was  included  in  all  other  results.  

Page 43: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

  43  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017  

Appendix  D—Results  Tables  for  Notable  Cross-­‐Tabulations    Only  those  cross-­‐tabulation  results  that  were  reported  in  the  “Notable  Cross-­‐Tabulations”  section  of  “Results”  are  included  in  the  appendix  below.    How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  *  What  is  

your  age?  Cross-­‐tabulation     What  is  your  age?   Total  

18-­‐24   25-­‐44   45-­‐64   65+  How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  

concussion  training  to  others?  

1  (Not  at  all)  

Count   0   11   6   0   17  %  within  What  is  

your  age?  0.0%   1.4%   0.8%   0.0%   1.1%  

2   Count   *   22   17   0    %  within  What  is  

your  age?     2.8%   2.4%   0.0%    

3   Count   *   100   79   0    %  within  What  is  

your  age?     12.5%   11.1%   0.0%    

4   Count   8   297   231   *    %  within  What  is  

your  age?  30.8%   37.2%   32.4%      

5  (Very)  

Count   13   368   380   9   770  %  within  What  is  

your  age?  50.0%   46.1%   53.3%   75.0%   49.7%  

Total   Count   26   798   713   12   1549  %  within  What  is  

your  age?  100.0%   100.0

%  100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

                                   

 

Page 44: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 44  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

 How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  prior  to  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  

How  do  you  self-­‐identify**?  Cross-­‐tabulation     How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  Total  

Male   Female  How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  prior  to  

completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

1  (Minimal)  

Count   42   35   77  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  4.0%   7.2%   5.0%  

2   Count   199   85   284  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  18.8%   17.5%   18.4%  

3   Count   461   193   654  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  43.4%   39.8%   42.3%  

4   Count   273   127   400  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  25.7%   26.2%   25.9%  

5  (Very  Knowledgeable)  

Count   86   45   131  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  8.1%   9.3%   8.5%  

Total   Count   1061   485   1546  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  100.0%   100.0%   100.0

%    

How  much  do  you  now  know  about  concussions  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify**?  Cross-­‐tabulation  

  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  

Total  

Male   Female  How  

much  do  you  now  know  about  

concussions  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

1  (Minimal)  

Count   *   0    %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?     0.0%    

2   Count   *   *    %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?        

3   Count   80   22   102  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?   7.5%   4.5%   6.6%  

4   Count   605   242   847  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?   57.0%   49.9%   54.8%  

5  (Very  Knowledgeable)  

Count   371   220   591  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?   35.0%   45.4%   38.2%  

Total   Count   1061   485   1546  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?   100.0%   100.0%   100.0

%    

   

Page 45: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 45  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

How  likely  are  you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify**?  Cross-­‐tabulation  

  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  

Total  

Male   Female  How  likely  are  

you  to  recommend  the  CATT  online  concussion  training  to  others?  

1  (Not  at  all)  

Count   10   7   17  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  0.9%   1.4%   1.1%  

2   Count   29   11   40  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  2.7%   2.3%   2.6%  

3   Count   134   49   183  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  12.6%   10.1%   11.8%  

4   Count   391   146   537  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  36.9%   30.1%   34.7%  

5  (Very)   Count   497   272   769  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  46.8%   56.1%   49.7%  

Total   Count   1061   485   1546  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  100.0%   100.0%   100.0%  

 Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify**?  Cross-­‐tabulation  

  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  

Total  

Male   Female  Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  

mandate  concussion  

training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  

Yes   Count   706   352   1058  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  66.5%   72.6%   68.4%  

No   Count   164   64   228  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  15.5%   13.2%   14.7%  

I  don’t  know  

Count   191   69   260  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  18.0%   14.2%   16.8%  

Total   Count   1061   485   1546  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  100.0%   100.0%   100.0%  

           

 

Page 46: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 46  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  prior  to  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  Cross-­‐tabulation  

  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  

Total  

1   2-­‐4   5-­‐10   >10  How  much  did  you  know  about  concussions  

prior  to  completing  the  CATT  online  course

?  

1  (Minimal

)  

Count   23   27   24   *    %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  

official?  

10.4%   5.3%   4.9%      

2   Count   60   116   76   29   281  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  

official?  

27.1%   22.6%   15.6%   9.2%   18.3%  

3   Count   81   231   205   136   653  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  

official?  

36.7%   44.9%    

42.0%   43.2%  

42.5%  

4   Count   48   110   138   102   398  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  

official?  

21.7%   21.4%   28.3%   32.4%  

25.9%  

5  (Very  Knowledgeable)  

Count   9   30   45   45   129  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  

official?  

4.1%   5.8%   9.2%   14.3%  

8.4%  

Total   Count   221   514   488   315   1538  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  

official?  

100.0%   100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

                         

Page 47: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 47  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

How  much  do  you  now  know  about  concussions  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  *  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  Cross-­‐tabulation  

  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  

Total  

1   2-­‐4   5-­‐10   >10  How  

much  do  you  now  know  about  

concussions  after  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

1  (Minimal)  

Count   *   0   0   0    %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  

hockey  official?  

 0.0%   0.0%   0.0%    

2   Count   0   *   *   *    %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  

hockey  official?  

0.0%          

3   Count   17   32   34   19   102  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  

hockey  official?  

7.7%   6.2%   7.0%   6.0%   6.6%  

4   Count   119   273   291   164   847  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  

hockey  official?  

53.8%   53.1%  

59.6%  

52.1%   55.1%  

5  (Very  Knowledgeable)  

Count   84   207   161   131   583  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  

hockey  official?  

38.0%   40.3%  

33.0%  

41.6%   37.9%  

Total   Count   221   514   488   315   1538  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  

hockey  official?  

100.0%   100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

                                     

Page 48: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 48  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Have  you  or  someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  concussion?  *  How  do  you  self-­‐identify**?  Cross-­‐tabulation  

  How  do  you  self-­‐identify?  

Total  

Male   Female  Have  you  or  

someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  concussion?  

No   Count   178   156   334  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  16.8%   32.2%   21.6%  

Yes   Count   880   329   1209  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  83.2%   67.8%   78.4%  

Total   Count   1058   485   1543  %  within  How  do  you  self-­‐

identify?  100.0%   100.0%   100.0%  

   Have  you  or  someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  concussion?  *  How  many  years  have  

you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  Cross-­‐tabulation     How  many  years  have  you  

been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  

Total  

1   2-­‐4   5-­‐10   >10  Have  you  

or  someone  close  to  you  ever  suffered  from  

concussion?  

No   Count   67   129   105   31   332  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  

30.3%  

25.2%   21.5%   9.9%   21.6%  

Yes   Count   154   383   383   283   1203  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  

69.7%  

74.8%   78.5%   90.1%   78.4%  

Total   Count   221   512   488   314   1535  %  within  How  many  years  have  you  been  involved  as  a  hockey  official?  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

                           

Page 49: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 49  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Did  the  CATT  online  course  prepare  you  to  handle  the  situation  appropriately?  *  How  much  time  did  you  spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  Cross-­‐tabulation  

  How  much  time  did  you  spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

Total  

15-­‐30  mins  

30  mins-­‐1  hr  

1-­‐2  hrs  

2+  hrs  

Don’t  remember  

Did  the  CATT  online  course  prepare  you  to  handle  the  

situation  appropria

tely?  

Yes   Count   60   284   130   30   251   755  %  within  How  much  time  did  you  

spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

71.4%   84.5%   89.7%   88.2%  

86.0%   84.7%  

Somewhat   Count   19   50   14   *   36    %  within  How  much  time  did  you  

spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

22.6%   14.9%   9.7%    12.3%    

No   Count   5   *   *   *   5    %  within  How  much  time  did  you  

spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

6.0%        1.7%    

Total   Count   84   336   145   34   292   891  %  within  How  much  time  did  you  

spend  completing  the  CATT  online  course?  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

100.0%  

           

Page 50: CATT Evaluation Report - 2017 FINAL SKB Final Edits · 2017. 9. 8. · 6"|CATTfor!Team!Officials!|!BC!Hockey!Evaluation!2017! "This!initiative!provides!the!opportunity!to!evaluate!the!ConcussionAwareness!Training!Tool!(CATT)!

 50  |  CATT  for  Team  Officials  |  BC  Hockey  Evaluation  2017    

Do  you  think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  parents  of  players  registered  with  BC  Hockey?  *  Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  to  

its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  Cross-­‐tabulation     Were  you  aware  of  the  

CATT  online  course  prior  to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  

Total  

No   Yes  Do  you  

think  that  BC  Hockey  should  mandate  concussion  training  for  the  

parents  of  players  

registered  with  BC  Hockey?  

Yes   Count   731   332   1063  %  within  Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  

to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  

66.1%   74.3%   68.4%  

No   Count   182   48   230  %  within  Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  

to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  

16.5%   10.7%   14.8%  

I  don’t  know  

Count   193   67   260  %  within  Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  

to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  

17.5%   15.0%   16.7%  

Total   Count   1106   447   1553  %  within  Were  you  aware  of  the  CATT  online  course  prior  

to  its  mandate  by  BC  Hockey?  

100.0%   100.0%   100.0%  

 *:  For  options  with  fewer  than  five  respondents,  these  frequencies  were  removed  from  results  tables  to  ensure  that  no  participants  are  identifiable.    **:  Fewer  than  five  respondents  self-­‐identified  as  non-­‐binary,  and  were  therefore  not  included  in  any  data  relating  to  self-­‐identified  gender  only.  Non-­‐binary  respondent  data  was  included  in  all  other  results.