Catalytic Dehydration Diols on Zeolite
Transcript of Catalytic Dehydration Diols on Zeolite
React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., Vol. 51, No. i, 177-181 (1993)
RKCL2153
SELECTIVE CYCLODEHYDRAT!ON OF DIOLS ON ZEOLITES
C.P. Bezouhanova and F.A. Jabur
University of Sofia, Faculty of Chemistry
i, J. Bourchier Ave, Sofia 1126, Bulgaria
Received October 8, 1992 Accepted May 6, 1993
1,4-Butanediol, 2,5-hexanediol and 1,5-pentanediol
were selectively converted to tetrahydrofuran and
tetrahydropyran in the presence of LaHY, CaHY and
H-ZSM-6 zeolites. The advantage of these zeolites
is in their high stability and faster regeneration.
The use of zeolites as acid catalysts for organic reac-
tions has found considerable interest [11. The selectivity of
the catalyst appeared to be of great importance for its pre-
parative application. Earlier investigations on the dehydra-
tion of 1,4-butanediol on synthetic A and X zeolites showed
that tetrahydrofuran can be obtained with high selectivity and
very good yield using HNaX zeolite as catalyst [23. The yield
of tetrahydrofuran diminished after 14 hours on stream and it
has not been shown how long the catalyst could be regenerated.
In another investigation [3J NaHY was applied for 2,5-hexane-
diol and 1,5-pentanediol conversion. The temperature was higher
than hhat in E43, where Al(III)-montmorillonite was the cata-
lyst and data on catalyst deactivation have not been presented.
It is well known that HNaX and HNaY zeolites are easily deac-
tivated by coking [51. The introduction of multivalent cations
stabilizes the zeolite structure and improves the catalytic ac-
tivity. The stability of the zeolite structure as well as de-
Akad4miai Kiad6, Budapest
BEZOUHANOVA, JABUR: CYCLODEHYDRATION OF DIOLS
activation by coking depends also on the ratio Si/AI. In this
respect high-silica zeolites of the pentasil type (ZSM-5) have
been found to possess very stable structures and low rate of
deactivation because of the channel dimensions, which do not
allow the formation of the bulky coke deposits. Taking into ac-
count the improved stability of faujasites containing multi-
valent cations and the low coking ability of H-ZSM-5 zeolites,
we checked the activity and selectivity of LaHY, CaHY and
H-ZSM-5 zeolites in cyclodehydration of 1,4-butanediol, 2,5-
hexanediol and 1,5-pentanediol.
EXPERIMENTAL
Catalysts
LaHY and CaHY were prepared by ion exchange of NaY zeolite
with NH4CI and the corresponding salts under conditions de-
scribed in [5]. H-ZSM-5 (Si/AI=40) was obtained by HCl-solution
treatment of Czechoslovak commercial Na-ZSM-5 zeolite. The ac-
tivation and regeneration of the used catalysts was performed
at 773 K in air flow.
Reagents
The diols were commercial products. 1,4-Butanediol and
1,5-pentanediol were from Fluka; 2,5-hexanediol (isomer mix-
ture) from Merck-Schuchardt.
Apparatus
The catalytic experiments were performed in a fixed bed
flow reactor with different catalyst quantities (0.05-1 g),
pressed, crushed and sieved to particles of 1.25-2.5 nm size.
Before the experiments the catalysts were flushed with nitro-
gen. The diols were introduced using a calibrated syringe.
Analysis
GC analysis of the reaction products were performed on a
2 m column with 15% Reoplex-400 on Chromosorb P/NAW 30-60 mesh
at 453 K.
178
BEZOUHANOVA, JABUR: CYCLODEHYDRATION OF DIOLS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The experimental conditions have been determined for the
selective cyclodehydration of 1,4- and 1,5-diols. It has been
established that at 523 K 1,4-butanediol was completely con-
verted to tetrahydrofuran (Fig. i) in the presence of LaHY. The
selectivity of the three zeolite catalysts used was 100%. This
fact has been verified by GC analysis and IR spectra of the
products. The catalyst activity diminished at smaller contact
times (greater WHSV).
100-
80- > C 0 U
60-
I I I I
1.2 2.4 6.1 12.2
WHSV h -1
Fig. I. 1,4-Butanediol conversion on LaHY (A), CaHY (e)
and H-ZSM-5 (o) zeolites at 523 K, 1 h on stream
Similar results have been obtained using Al(III)-montmo-
rillonite as catalyst [43. The advantage of the zeolite cata-
lysts is in the simple apparatus (not in autoclave) and the
better reproducibility of zeolite preparation.
As in the case of pinacole conversion [6], LaHY showed
the best performance, followed by CaHY. The activities of CaHY
and H-ZSM-5 zeolites in 1,4-butanediol conversion were compara-
ble. From 2,5-hexanediol, with zeolite catalysts, a mixture of
cis- and trans-isomers of 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran [7] has
179
100
8O
50 c o o
40
20
i [ I i i 075 15 3.4 ~5 15
WHSV h - I
BEZOHHANOVA, JABUR: CYCLODEHYDRATION OF DIOLS
Fig. 2. 2,5-Hexanediol conversion on zeolites at 503 K
(notation as in Fig. i)
been obtained (Fig. 2). The conversion was 100% at greater con-
tact times in the presence of LaHY or CaHY, while H-ZSM-5 was
less active. At shorter contact times the conversion dropped
rather sharply.
Tetrahydropyran was selectively obtained by the dehydra-
tion of 1,5-pentanediol on LaHY, CaHY and H-ZSM-5 zeolites
(Fig. 3). The results were similar to those in E43. A high se-
lectivity in cyclodehydration of the zeolite catalysts studied
has been achieved at temperatures slightly higher than with
Al(III)-montmorillonite [43, but lower than with NaHY [3]. Our
experiments showed that the activity of LaHY remained constant
for 12 h, while that of CaHY for 8 h on stream. No deactiva-
tion of H-ZSM-5 was observed.
In conclusion LaHY, CaHY and H-ZSM-5 zeolites are selec-
tive catalysts for the cyclodehydration of 1,4-diols to tetra-
hydrofuran derivatives and of 1,5-diols to tetrahydropyrans.
The advantage of these catalysts is in their lower deactiva-
180
BEZOUHANOVA, JABUR: CYCLODEHYDRATION OF DIOLS
t-
O o
I00
BO
60
40
20 \
I I t
0.75 I'50 3.00 7150 15.00
WHSV h - I
Fig. 3. 1,5-Pentanediol conversion on zeolites at 533 K
(notation as in Fig. i)
tion and better regeneration.
REFERENCES
i. W. Hoelderich, M. Hesse, F. Naumann: Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl., 27, 226 (1988).
2. Kh.I. Areshidze, G.O. Chivadze: Khim. Geterotsikl. Soed.,
195 (1969).
3. A. Moln~r, I. Bucsi, M. Bart6k: in Proc. Int. Symp. on
Zeolite Catalysis, Si6fok, Hungary, May 13-16. 1985, p.571.
4. D. Kotkar, P.K. Ghosh: J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 650
(1986).
5. C.P. Bezouhanova, P. Kovacheva, Kh. Dimitrov, Y. Kurteva:
Kinet. Katal., 19, 760 (1978), and refs therein.
6. C. Bezouhanova, F.A. Jabur: in preparation
7. G. Kyryacos, H.R. Menapace, C.E. Boord: Anal. Chem., 31,
222 (1959).
181