Cassc Cstraw Stsmc Final Paper
-
Upload
jude-mangilog -
Category
Documents
-
view
5 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Cassc Cstraw Stsmc Final Paper
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
0
University of the Philippines Visayas
College of Arts and Sciences
Student Council
Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee
Survey and Report on the ST System, 1st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
1
Acknowledgement
The UPV CAS Student Council Committee on Students Rights and Welfare ST System Monitoring Committee are thankful to those helped and contribute to this effort to
produce a report, survey, and assessment of the ST System:
To the Office of Student Affairs, Student Loan Board, and Office of the Vice Chancellor
for Academic Affairs for approving our various requests for data.
To the UPV University Student Council for contacting the other College Student
Councils to participate in this survey.
To CM-SC, CFOS-SC, SOTECH-SC for the active participation by administering the
survey in their campuses.
To the UPV CAS SC STRAW volunteer corps who helped in the encoding of data and
for their time in doing tasks assigned to them.
To June Elle Tanedo for volunteering to be the Committees statistics point person and in-charge of statistical analysis.
To the students of CAS, CFOS, SOTECH, and CM for participating in the survey.
Most especially to the members of the UPV CAS SC who helped in brain storming in the
planning of this monitoring, in following up details, and supporting this committee.
Most especially also to students whose right to accessible education was deprived
because of policies that attempt to commercialize this essential right. To Kristel Tejada and
Rosanna Sanfuego and others, this is most especially dedicate to you. We will continue to assert
each students right to education and stand by the people to forward their genuine interests until
such time that the sad reality of students committing suicide because of the high cost of
education will never happen anymore.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
2
Table of Contents
Acknowledgement .................................................................................................. 1
Table of contents .................................................................................................... 2
Abbreviations used ................................................................................................. 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4
Objectives ............................................................................................................... 6
Methodology ........................................................................................................... 7
Scope ....................................................................................................................... 7
Population and sample size ..................................................................................... 7
Results and analysis ................................................................................................. 9
I. Consideration of all cases (with scholarship) .......................................... 9
II. Consideration of all cases (without scholarship) .................................... 13
III. Difficulty in applying for ST System .................................................... 16
IV. Difficulty on enrolment ......................................................................... 17
V. Enrolment on the specified date ............................................................. 17
VI. Application for student loan ................................................................... 18
VII. Reflection of students toward their bracket assignment ........................ 19
Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 21
Appendix A: Per College Results .............................................................................. 24
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
3
Abbreviations
CAS College of Arts and Sciences
CAS SC College of Arts and Sciences Student Council
CFOS College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences
CFOS SC College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences Student Council
CM SC College of Management Student Council
FD Full Discount
FDS Full Discount with Stipend
ND No Discount
PD40 Partial Discount 40%
PD60 Partial Discount 60%
PD80 Partial Discount 80%
SOTECH School of Technology
SOTECH SC School of Technology Student Council
ST System or STS Socialized Tuition System
STFAP Socialized Tuition and Financial Assistance Program
UPV University of the Philippines Visayas
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
4
Introduction
The Socialized Tuition System was implemented as an improved version of the STFAP
last First Semester of the current Academic Year 2014-2015. This new tuition policy assumes
that the problematic STFAP was improved through faster and easier application. STFAP was
widely criticized by the different sectors of the university as a burdensome policy for the
students because of the slow processing of bracket assignments and misbracketing. In response
to this dilemma, the UP Administration, despite the opposition of the student body, decided to
reform STFAP and thus made the Socialized Tuition System. Under ST System, the previous
14-page form of STFAP has become a 2-page online form. Assignment of brackets has become
faster under the ST System.
Despite of these praises and positive assessment of the ST System, after the first wave of
implementation of the ST System and the release of brackets, the hashtag #BracketAKaNa
became a nationwide trending common hashtag in the social media. This hashtag was used by
students who experienced misbracketing in the UP System in social media like Twitter and
Facebook. This manifested the discontentment and anger of the students nationwide in the
implementation of the improved STFAP.
Due to this, the CAS Student Council in its planning for the First Semester of Academic
Year 2014-2015 has decided, after an hour of discussion, to monitor the ST System through
conducting a survey to record the students experience and determine the pulse of the students.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
5
Finally, when the motion to establishing a monitoring committee was approved by the body, the
Committee on Students Rights and Welfare was tasked to prepare the necessary plans like
making the survey forms, coordinating with the University Student Council and other College
Student Councils. Last September 2014, letters to Office of the Student Affairs, Vice Chancellor
for Academic Affairs, and Student Loan Board were sent to request for necessary data. By
October 2014, survey forms were released to the local college student councils through their
respective point persons: CAS SC, CFOS SC, SOTECH SC, CM SC. From September 2014 to
December 2014, the focus of the Monitoring Committee was on giving out survey forms to
students and by January 2015 the focus was already on the collection of the survey forms. By
February to March, the data were encoded and analyzed.
After several months of data gathering, with the help of the local College Student
Councils and our resident statistical analyst, this monitoring has come to its final analysis.
Survey forms from CM, CAS, CFOS, and SOTECH Student Councils were returned to the CAS
SC. The CAS SC Students Rights and Welfare Committee Volunteer Corps and our resident
student statistical analyst worked for days and weeks in the collation and encoding of the data.
The convening of the CAS SC ST System Monitoring Committee is a project based on
CAS SCs commitment to assert for each Iskolars ng Bayans right to accessible education. This
initiative of the CAS Student Council is a response to the memorandum of the Student Regent to
monitor the implementation of the ST System and at the same time to contribute to the overall
struggle of the students to junk the Socialized Tuition System.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
6
The CAS SC with the other participant Student Councils in this survey are optimistic that
the UP Administration will open their ears to hear out the findings and analysis of this survey.
We also look forward to a partnership of the Student Councils and the Administration to work
for genuine students rights and welfare and the protection of each Filipino youths right to
education.
Objectives
1. To determine the bracket distribution of students under ST System and the previous
STFAP in the CAS, CFOS, CM, and SOTECH;
2. To determine the number of students experienced bracket sliding up and down or
retained;
3. To determine how the students rate the difficulty of applying in ST System;
4. To determine how the students rate the difficulty in enrolment in the First Semester of
Academic Year 2014-2015.
6. To determine the reasons of students for not enrolling on time;
7. To determine the number of students enrolled on time or not;
8. To determine the number of students availed for student loan;
9. To determine how students perceive their bracket if this reflects their socioeconomic
background and;
10. To know the students sentiments about the ST System.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
7
Methodology
Stratified sampling with proportional allocation, with margin of error of 6.5%, was
applied to this survey. Samples are taken such that each course from each academic organization
will have a representation in the final sample size. Intended sample size is 900 but is reduced to
844 due to non-responses. In the final calculation of bracket sliding, 1st year students and
students with scholarships are excluded from analysis since first year students have only STS as
their bracket and the presence of scholarship has significant effect on the bracket sliding. The
rest of the analysis on other variables utilizes the final sample size of 844.
Scope
The colleges surveyed in this Monitoring are the following: CAS, CM, CFOS, and
SOTECH. These colleges became part of this Monitoring because their Student Councils
willingly agreed to survey in their respective colleges.
Population and Sample size
A. Total Population by Colleges
1563 CAS
895 CM
297 FISH
317 SOTECH
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
8
B. By Academic Organizations
Table 1: Samples per organization
Academic Organization First year Upperclass
Elektrons 56 86
Redbolts 31 82
CM 90 150
Fish 41 106
Clovers 13 20
Sotech 56 81
Skimmers 8 24
C. By Colleges
CAS - 320
CM - 240
CFOS - 147
SOTECH 137
(*with Scholarship is excluded with our data final tables)
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
9
Results and Analysis
The data of the UPV CAS Student Council ST System Monitoring Committee show the
following results:
I. Consideration of ALL cases (with scholarship)1
Table 2: Survey of students experienced bracket slid up and down or retained (with scholarship)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
-4 (4 brackets
down) 1 .1 .2 .2
-3 (3 brackets
down) 3 .4 .6 .7
-2 (2 brackets
down) 18 2.1 3.3 4.1
-1 (1 bracket down 105 12.4 19.4 23.4
0 (retained) 291 34.5 53.7 77.1
1 (1 bracket up) 97 11.5 17.9 95.0
2 (2 brackets up) 19 2.3 3.5 98.5
3 (3 brackets up) 5 .6 .9 99.4
4 (4 brackets up) 2 .2 .4 99.8
5 (5 brackets up 1 .1 .2 100.0
Total 542 64.2 100.0
Missing System 302 35.8
Total 844 100.0
1 In order to look at the comparison between STFAP and STS, upperclassmen data only were considered on this
part because it is the upperclassmen, batches 2013 and below, that experienced the transition of STFAP to ST System.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
10
In the number of 844 students surveyed coming from CAS, CFOS, CM, and SOTECH
(544 are upperclassmen and 300 of which are freshmen), the percentage of students experienced
bracket sliding were:
77.1 % maintained their original STFAP brackets or have experienced assignment
to lower brackets under ST System and;
22.9% experienced bracket slide up
Table 3: Recoded STFAP (with scholarship)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 (bracket A) 76 9.0 14.0 14.0
2(bracket B) 180 21.3 33.1 47.1
3(bracket C) 109 12.9 20.0 67.1
4(bracket D) 103 12.2 18.9 86.0
5(bracket E1) 59 7.0 10.8 96.9
6(bracket E2) 17 2.0 3.1 100.0
Total 544 64.5 100.0
Missing System 300 35.5
Total 844 100.0
Table 4: Recoded ST System (with scholarship)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1(ND) 93 11.0 11.1 11.1
2(PD40) 209 24.8 25.0 36.1
3(PD60) 276 32.7 33.0 69.1
4(PD80) 185 21.9 22.1 91.2
5(FD) 58 6.9 6.9 98.1
6(FDS) 16 1.9 1.9 100.0
Total 837 99.2 100.0
Missing System 7 .8
Total 844 100.0
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
11
In the previous STFAP, the bracket distribution is:
A 14%
B 33.1%
C 20%
D 18.9%
E1 10.8%
E2 3.1%
Under the ST System, the bracket distribution of the respondents surveyed were:
ND 11.1 %
PD40 25.0%
PD60 33.0%
PD80 22.1%
FD 6.9%
FDS 1.9%
Under the ST System, students are mostly concentrated under brackets PD40 and PD60,
the middle brackets, this also holds true with the previous STFAP that the concentration of
students are on the middle brackets (brackets B and C).
It may be noticed that the number of bracket A students under STFAP has decreased in
the new ST System. But there is a significant decrease on the number of students enjoying free
tuition brackets (E1 and E2, FD and FDS).
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
12
In the STFAP, 14% of the respondents were assigned in the highest bracket; under ST
this has decreased to 11.1%.
In the STFAP, 33.1% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
40% discount, under ST, this has decreased t0 25.0%.
In the STFAP, 20.0% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
60% discount, under ST this has increased to 33.0%.
In the STFAP, 18.9% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
80% discount, under ST this has increased to 22.1%.
In the STFAP, 10.8% students are enjoying free tuition but this has decreased to 6.9%
under ST System.
In the STFAP, 3.1% students were enjoying free tuition plus stipend but under the ST
System this has down to 1.9%.
It can be observed that the trend of the bracket distribution after the ST System was
implemented in the First Semester of the Academic Year 2014-2015 was:
There was a decrease in the number of students paying no-discount tuition under ST
System but there was also a significant decrease in the number of students enjoying free tuition
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
13
brackets. The bulk of the students were assigned into middle paying brackets (PD40, PD60,
PD80), especially under ST System, the number of students paying tuition with 60% discount
increased.
II. In consideration of cases of without scholarships (only upperclassmen data were considered in
order to see the comparison between STFAP and ST System)
Table 5: Table 1: Survey of students experienced bracket slid up and down or retained (without scholarship)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
-3 (3 brackets down) 1 .2 .3 .3
-2 (2 brackets down) 11 1.7 2.8 3.1
-1 (1 bracket down) 65 10.3 16.7 19.8
0 (retained) 222 35.2 57.1 76.9
1 (1 bracket up) 73 11.6 18.8 95.6
2 (2 brackets up) 14 2.2 3.6 99.2
3 (3 brackets up) 1 .2 .3 99.5
4 (4 brackets up) 1 .2 .3 99.7
5 (5 brackets up) 1 .2 .3 100.0
Total 389 61.6 100.0
Missing System 242 38.4
Total 631 100.0
76.9% - maintained their bracket and bracket slid down.
23.1% - experienced bracket slid up.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
14
Table 6: Recoded STFAP (without scholarship)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 (bracket A) 55 8.7 14.1 14.1
2 (bracket B) 158 25.0 40.4 54.5
3 (bracket C) 92 14.6 23.5 78.0
4 (bracket D) 61 9.7 15.6 93.6
5 (bracket E1) 16 2.5 4.1 97.7
6 (bracket E2) 9 1.4 2.3 100.0
Total 391 62.0 100.0
Missing System 240 38.0
Total 631 100.0
Table 7: Recoded ST System (without scholarship)
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 (ND) 55 8.7 14.1 14.1
2 (PD40 158 25.0 40.4 54.5
3 (PD60) 92 14.6 23.5 78.0
4 (PD80) 61 9.7 15.6 93.6
5 (FD) 16 2.5 4.1 97.7
6 (FDS) 9 1.4 2.3 100.0
Total 391 62.0 100.0
Missing System 240 38.0
Total 631 100.0
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
15
The bracket distribution of the respondents without scholarship:
Under STS:
ND 12.6%
PD40 29.8%
PD60 34.6%
PD80 17.1%
FD 4.1%
FDS 1.3%
Under STFAP:
A 14.1%
B 40.4%
C 23.5%
D 15.6%
E1 4.1%
E2 1.3%
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
16
III. Difficulty of applying in the ST System
Table 8: Difficulty of applying in ST SYSTEM
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 40 6.3 6.4 6.4
2 (Easy) 147 23.3 23.4 29.8
3 (Average) 336 53.2 53.6 83.4
4 (Difficult) 86 13.6 13.7 97.1
5 (Very difficult) 18 2.9 2.9 100.0
Total 627 99.4 100.0
Missing System 4 .6
Total 631 100.0
83.4% of the respondents have average to very easy application in the ST System while
16.4% have difficulty.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
17
IV. Difficulty on enrolment
Table 9: Difficulty level of enrolment, 1st
semester AY 2014-2015
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 33 5.2 5.3 5.3
2 (Easy) 125 19.8 19.9 25.2
3 (Average) 274 43.4 43.7 68.9
4 (Difficult) 145 23.0 23.1 92.0
5 (Very difficult) 50 7.9 8.0 100.0
Total 627 99.4 100.0
Missing System 4 .6
Total 631 100.0
68.9% of the respondents have average to little difficulty in enrolling, 31.1% have
difficulty.
V. Enrolment on the specified enrolment date
Table 10: Enrolment on the specified time
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, not enrolled on time) 82 13.0 13.0 13.0
1 (Yes, enrolled on time) 546 86.5 86.8 99.8
2 (unanswered) 1 .2 .2 100.0
Total 629 99.7 100.0
Missing System 2 .3
Total 631 100.0
86.7% enrolled on time, 13.3% were not able to enrol on time.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
18
The reasons for non-enrolment on time were as follows:
47.12% - Enrolment processes that caused delays in enrolment (this include CRS
matters, subjects, and other related).
35.58% - Financial-related reasons.
15.38% - were other reasons for the delay of enrolment which includes travel and
personal choice.
1.92% - uncleared accountabilities.
VI. Availment of student loan
Table 11: Application for student loan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not apply for
loan) 455 72.1 77.4 77.4
1 (Yes, applied for
loan) 133 21.1 22.6 100.0
Total 588 93.2 100.0
Missing System 43 6.8
Total 631 100.0
77.4% did not avail for student loan, 22.6% availed student loan.
While this may indicate that the number of students availed for student loan significantly
became lower under ST System, it is also necessary to look into the four-month break that may
give students the time to apply for summer jobs or their parents that were able to save money for
enrolment. This possible scenario is the limitation of this Monitoring.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
19
VII. Reflection of students toward their bracket assignment
Table 12: Students perception of their assigned bracket
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, bracket does not
reflect their actual
socioeconomic condition)
302 47.9 48.2 48.2
1 (Yes, bracket reflects
actual socioeconomic
condition)
325 51.5 51.8 100.0
Total 627 99.4 100.0
Missing System 4 .6
Total 631 100.0
51.8% agree that their bracket reflect their socioeconomic background while 48.2% does
not.
VIII. Students comments on the ST System
Students were asked of their sentiments regarding the ST System; out of the 844
respondents, only 429 students wrote their comments regarding ST System. We grouped these
sentiments into three numerical groups:
1 These sentiments are negative of the ST System, that students think that the
system is unfair, biased, does not reflect their true socioeconomic background and suggests the
junking of the system, and even pushes for flat rate tuition system and education as a right.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
20
2 These students are also negative and point out the loopholes in the system and
proposed certain improvements and reform on the ST System.
3 Students who had neutral sentiments toward the system; they are neither
positive nor negative.
4 These students are approving towards the system and think that they do not
have problems regarding the system.
After the grouping, the results in percentage is:
1 55.48% of the respondents are negative towards ST System and thinks that it
is unfair, biased, does not reflect their actual situation, suggests the need to junk the system,
pushes for a flat rate tuition system, and education as a right.
2 24.94% of the respondents negative through pointing out the loopholes in the
system and proposes certain improvements and reform on the ST System.
3 3.03% of the respondents are neither positive nor negative of the system.
4 16.55% of the respondents are approving of the ST System.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
21
Conclusion
After the numbers presented, we arrived at these conclusions:
1. The number of students paying for no-discount tuition under ST System has decreased,
the number, however, of students that are tuition-free (the E1 and E2 under STFAP and FD and
FDS under ST System) decreased. The bulk of the students were assigned in middle paying
brackets like PD60 and PD80. It can be argued then that, the decrease in ND or bracket A was a
result of students reassignment to lower brackets. And can be argued further that the decrease in
E1/E2 and FD/FDS was a result of bracket sliding up of the students after the ST System
implementation.
2. 83.4% of the students surveyed have average to very easy application in the ST System
while 16.4% have difficulty.
3. 68.9% of the respondents have average to little difficulty in enrolling, 31.1% have
difficulty
4. 86.7% enrolled on time, 13.3% were not able to enrol on time. In this 13.3% of
students who were not able to enrol on time, the reasons cited are:
47.12% - Enrolment processes that caused delays in enrolment (this include CRS
matters, subjects, and other related).
35.58% - Financial-related reasons.
15.38% - were other reasons for the delay of enrolment which includes travel and
personal choice.
1.92% - uncleared accountabilities
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
22
It is understandable that 47.12% of students were delayed on their enrolment because of
enrolment-related technicalities like courses enlistment, advisers signature and others as these
problems are the semestral dilemma of UP. But the figure 35.58% as the percentage of students
who had delayed enrolments because of financial related reasons is a significant figure. This only
means that despite of the Socialized Tuition and the promise of its accessibility, 35.58% of the
respondents have delayed enrolment because of financial aspect that includes: tuition, ST System
misbracketing, loan (as some of the reasons cited by the respondents).
5. After the implementation of ST System, there was a significant decrease in the number
of students applying for student loan in the 1st semester of A.Y. 2014-2015: 77.4% did not avail
for student loan, 22.6% availed student loan. However, one must need to consider the four-month
break that might have given ample time to the students and their parents to save for the
enrolment; this was not covered by the survey and thus constitutes as one of its limitations.
6. 51.8% agree that their bracket truly reflect their socioeconomic background while
48.2% does not.
7. 55.48% of the respondents have a very negative reaction on the ST System. These
negative sentiments compose the majority of the students that think that ST System is unfair,
biased, and does not truly reflect their actual socioeconomic situation. This 55.48% of the
respondents even suggest that ST System should be junked and to implement a flat rate tuition
system for all and expressed that education is a right. While 24.94% maintains that ST System
has loopholes and there is a need to give it a time or to reform it. Only 16.55% are approving of
the ST System.
8. In the final conclusion, it may be true that ST System is faster in processing than the
STFAP because it is only a 2-page online form. But the first implementation of the policy was
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
23
widely criticized by the UP student body as it assigned wrongful brackets to people. Majority of
the students are aware that ST System is no different with the STFAP that brackets the right to
education. Also, majority of the students believe on the argument that ST System, or any similar
form of it, should be junked and that education be a right of everyone.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
24
Appendix A
Per College Results
I. College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
a. Bracket distribution under STFAP and ST System:
Table 13: Recoded STFAP
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (bracket A) 17 6.6 10.3 10.3
2 (bracket B) 60 23.3 36.4 46.7
3 (bracket C) 42 16.3 25.5 72.1
4 (bracket D) 30 11.7 18.2 90.3
5 (bracket E1) 8 3.1 4.8 95.2
6 (bracket E2) 8 3.1 4.8 100.0
Total 165 64.2 100.0
Missing System 92 35.8
Total 257 100.0
Table 14: Recoded ST System
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (ND) 31 12.1 12.1 12.1
2 (PD40) 68 26.5 26.5 38.5
3 (PD60) 89 34.6 34.6 73.2
4 (PD80) 49 19.1 19.1 92.2
5 (FD) 17 6.6 6.6 98.8
6 (FDS) 3 1.2 1.2 100.0
Total 257 100.0 100.0
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
25
STFAP:
A 10.3%
B 36.4%
C 25.5%
D 18.2%
E1 4.8%
E2 4.8%
ST System:
ND 12.1%
PD40 26.5%
PD60 34.6%
PD80 19.1%
FD 6.6%
FDS 1.2%
In the STFAP, 10.3% of the respondents were assigned in the highest bracket; under ST
this has increased to 12.1%.
In the STFAP, 36.4% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
40% discount, under ST, this has decreased to 26.5%.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
26
In the STFAP, 25.5% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
60% discount, under ST this has increased to 34.6%.
In the STFAP, 18.2% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
80% discount, under ST this has increased to 19.1%.
In the STFAP, 4.8% students are enjoying free tuition but this has decreased to 6.6%
under ST System.
In the STFAP, 4.8% students were enjoying free tuition plus stipend but under the ST
System this has down to 1.2%.
b. Experience of bracket sliding
Table 15: Experience of bracket sliding
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
-2 (2 brackets down) 7 2.7 4.2 4.2
-1 (1 bracket down) 29 11.3 17.6 21.8
0 (retained) 95 37.0 57.6 79.4
1 (1 bracket up) 27 10.5 16.4 95.8
2 (2 brackets up) 7 2.7 4.2 100.0
Total 165 64.2 100.0
Missing System 92 35.8
Total 257 100.0
79.4% experienced maintained or slid down bracket, 20.6% slid up.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
27
c. Difficulty level in applying for ST System
Table 16: Difficulty level in applying for ST System
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 18 7.0 7.1 7.1
2 (Easy) 53 20.6 20.8 27.8
3 (Average) 137 53.3 53.7 81.6
4 (Difficult) 41 16.0 16.1 97.6
5 (Very difficult) 6 2.3 2.4 100.0
Total 255 99.2 100.0
Missing System 2 .8
Total 257 100.0
81.6% have average to easy application in the STS, 28.4% have experienced difficulty.
d. Difficulty level in enrolment
Table 17: Difficulty level in enrolment for the 1st
semester, A.Y. 2014-2015
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 5 1.9 2.0 2.0
2 (Easy) 48 18.7 18.8 20.8
3 (Average) 117 45.5 45.9 66.7
4 (Difficult) 63 24.5 24.7 91.4
5 (Very difficult) 22 8.6 8.6 100.0
Total 255 99.2 100.0
Missing System 2 .8
Total 257 100.0
66.7% have average to easy experience in enrolment, 33.3% have difficulty .
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
28
e. Enrolment on the specified date
Table 18: Enrolment on the specified date
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not enrol in the
specified date) 39 15.2 15.2 15.2
1 (Yes, enrolee on the
specified date) 217 84.4 84.4 99.6
2 (unanswered) 1 .4 .4 100.0
Total 257 100.0 100.0
15.2% did not enrol on specified date, 84.4% enrolled on time
f. Application for student loan
Table 19: Application for student loan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not apply for
student loan) 193 75.1 78.8 78.8
1 (Yes, applied for
student loan) 52 20.2 21.2 100.0
Total 245 95.3 100.0
Missing System 12 4.7
Total 257 100.0
78.8% did not avail for student loan, 21.2% availed loan.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
29
g. Students perception on their bracket
Table 20: Students perception on their bracket
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
0 (No, bracket does not
reflect actual
socioeconomic
condition)
193 75.1 78.8 78.8
1 (Yes, bracket reflects
actual socioeconomic
condition)
52 20.2 21.2 100.0
Total 245 95.3 100.0
Missing System 12 4.7
Total 257 100.0
49.8% believe that it reflects their bracket, 50.2% believes that it doesnt reflect his/her true
bracket
II. College of Management (CM)
a. Students perception of their bracket assignment
Table 21: Students perception of their bracket
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
0 (No, bracket does not reflect
actual socioeconomic situation) 128 49.8 49.8 49.8
1 (Yes, bracket reflects actual
socioeconomic situation) 129 50.2 50.2 100.0
Total 257 100.0 100.0
50.7% think that their STS bracket truly reflect their socioeconomic background, 49.3% think
that it does not.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
30
b. Bracketing under ST System and STFAP:
Table 22: Bracket distribution under STFAP
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
1 (bracket A) 24 11.9 19.2 19.2
2 (bracket B) 52 25.9 41.6 60.8
3 (bracket C) 27 13.4 21.6 82.4
4 (bracket D) 17 8.5 13.6 96.0
5 (bracket E1) 4 2.0 3.2 99.2
6 (bracket E2) 1 .5 .8 100.0
Total 125 62.2 100.0
Missing System 76 37.8
Total 201 100.0
Table 23: Bracket distribution under ST System
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (ND) 33 16.4 16.6 16.6
2 (PD40) 60 29.9 30.2 46.7
3 (PD60) 67 33.3 33.7 80.4
4 (PD80) 32 15.9 16.1 96.5
5 (FD) 3 1.5 1.5 98.0
6 (FDS) 4 2.0 2.0 100.0
Total 199 99.0 100.0
Missing System 2 1.0
Total 201 100.0
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
31
STFAP:
A 19.2%
B 41.6%
C 21.6%
D 13.6%
E1 3.2%
E2 - .8%
ST System:
ND 16.6%
PD40 30.2%
PD60 33.7%
PD80 16.1%
FD 1.5%
FDS 2.0%
In the STFAP, 19.2% of the respondents were assigned in the highest bracket; under ST
this has decreased to 16.6%.
In the STFAP, 41.6% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
40% discount, under ST, this has decreased to 30.2%.
In the STFAP, 21.6% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
60% discount, under ST this has increased to 33.7%.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
32
In the STFAP, 13.6% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
80% discount, under ST this has increased 16.1%.
In the STFAP, 3.2% students are enjoying free tuition but this has decreased to 1.5%
under ST System.
In the STFAP, .8% students were enjoying free tuition plus stipend but under the ST
System this has up to 2.0%.
c. Experience of bracket sliding
Table 24: Experience of bracket sliding
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
-3 (3 brackets down) 1 .5 .8 .8
-2 (2 brackets down) 1 .5 .8 1.6
-1 (1 bracket down) 24 11.9 19.4 21.0
0 (retained) 72 35.8 58.1 79.0
1 (1 bracket up) 23 11.4 18.5 97.6
2 (2 brackets up) 3 1.5 2.4 100.0
Total 124 61.7 100.0
Missing System 77 38.3
Total 201 100.0
79% experienced maintained or slid down bracket, 21% slid up.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
33
d. Difficulty level in applying for ST System
Table 25: Difficulty level in applying for ST System
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 12 6.0 6.0 6.0
2 (Easy) 65 32.3 32.3 38.3
3 (Average) 99 49.3 49.3 87.6
4 (Difficult) 22 10.9 10.9 98.5
5 (Very difficult) 3 1.5 1.5 100.0
Total 201 100.0 100.0
87.6% have experienced average to very easy application while 12.4% experienced
difficulty.
e. Difficulty level in enrolment
Table 26: Difficulty level in enrolment, 1st
semester A.Y. 2014-2015
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 14 7.0 7.0 7.0
2 (Easy) 45 22.4 22.4 29.4
3 (Average) 73 36.3 36.3 65.7
4 (Difficult) 50 24.9 24.9 90.5
5 (Very difficult) 19 9.5 9.5 100.0
Total 201 100.0 100.0
65.7% have average to very easy experience in enrolment, 34.3% have difficulty.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
34
f. Enrolment on the specified date
Table 27: Enrolment on the specified date
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not enrol in the
specified date) 24 11.9 11.9 11.9
1 (Yes, enrolled in the
specified date) 177 88.1 88.1 100.0
Total 201 100.0 100.0
11.9% did not enrol on specified date, 88.1% enrolled on time.
g. Application for student loan
Table 28: Application for student loan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not apply for
student loan) 153 76.1 78.9 78.9
1 (Yes, applied for student
loan) 41 20.4 21.1 100.0
Total 194 96.5 100.0
Missing System 7 3.5
Total 201 100.0
78.9% did not avail for student loan, 21.1% availed loan.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
35
III. College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences (CFOS)
a. Students perception on the bracket assignment
Table 29: Students perception on their brackets
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, bracket does not
reflect actual socioeconomic
condition)
36 46.8 47.4 47.4
1 (Yes, bracket reflects
actual socioeconomic
comdition)
40 51.9 52.6 100.0
Total 76 98.7 100.0
Missing System 1 1.3
Total 77 100.0
47.4% believe that it reflects their bracket, 52.6% believes that it doesnt reflect his/her true
bracket
b. Bracket distribution under STFAP and ST System
Table 30: Recoded STFAP
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (bracket A) 8 10.4 16.3 16.3
2 (bracket B) 23 29.9 46.9 63.3
3 (bracket C) 12 15.6 24.5 87.8
4 (bracket D) 5 6.5 10.2 98.0
5 (bracket E1 and E2) 1 1.3 2.0 100.0
Total 49 63.6 100.0
Missing System 28 36.4
Total 77 100.0
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
36
Table 31: Recoded ST System
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (ND) 7 9.1 9.2 9.2
2 (PD40) 27 35.1 35.5 44.7
3 (PD60) 26 33.8 34.2 78.9
4 (PD80) 12 15.6 15.8 94.7
5 (FD) 3 3.9 3.9 98.7
6 (FDS) 1 1.3 1.3 100.0
Total 76 98.7 100.0
Missing System 1 1.3
Total 77 100.0
STFAP:
A 16.3%
B 46.9%
C 24.5%
D 10.2%
E 2.0%
STS:
ND 9.2%
PD40 35.5%
PD60 34.2%
PD80 15.8%
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
37
FDS 5.2%
In the STFAP, 16.3% of the respondents were assigned in the highest bracket; under ST
this has decreased to 9.2%.
In the STFAP, 46.9% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
40% discount, under ST, this has decreased to 35.5%.
In the STFAP, 24.5% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
60% discount, under ST this has increased to 34.2%.
In the STFAP, 10.2% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
80% discount, under ST this has increased to 15.8%.
In the STFAP, 2.0% students are enjoying free tuition but this has decreased to 5.2%
under ST System.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
38
c. Experience of bracket sliding up and down or retain
Table 32: Experience of bracket sliding up, down, and retain
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
-2 (2 brackets down) 1 1.3 2.1 2.1
-1 (1 bracket down) 6 7.8 12.5 14.6
0 (retain) 26 33.8 54.2 68.8
1 (1 bracket up) 11 14.3 22.9 91.7
2 (2 brackets up) 2 2.6 4.2 95.8
4 (4 brackets up) 1 1.3 2.1 97.9
5 (5 brackets up) 1 1.3 2.1 100.0
Total 48 62.3 100.0
Missing System 29 37.7
Total 77 100.0
71.2% experienced maintained or slid down bracket, 28.8% slid up.
d. Level of difficulty in ST System application
Table 33: Level of difficulty in ST System application
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 3 3.9 3.9 3.9
2 (Easy) 15 19.5 19.5 23.4
3 (Average) 40 51.9 51.9 75.3
4 (Difficult) 13 16.9 16.9 92.2
5 (Very difficult) 6 7.8 7.8 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
39
75.3% have average to very easy application under ST System, 24.7% have difficulty.
e. Level of difficulty in the enrolment for 1st semester, A.Y. 2014-2015
Table 34: Level of difficulty in the enrolment for the 1st
semester, 2014-2015
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 2 2.6 2.6 2.6
2 (Easy) 14 18.2 18.2 20.8
3 (Average) 39 50.6 50.6 71.4
4 (Difficult) 16 20.8 20.8 92.2
5 (Very difficult) 6 7.8 7.8 100.0
Total 77 100.0 100.0
71.4% have ease in enrolment, 28.6% have difficulty in enrolment.
f. Enrolment on the specified date
Table 35: Enrolment on the specified date
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not enrol on the
specified date) 12 15.6 15.8 15.8
1 (Yes, enrolled on the
specified date) 64 83.1 84.2 100.0
Total 76 98.7 100.0
Missing System 1 1.3
Total 77 100.0
15.8% did not enrol on specified date, 84.2% enrolled on time.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
40
g. Application for student loan
Table 36: Application for student loan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not apply for
student loan) 52 67.5 73.2 73.2
1 (Yes, applied for student
loan) 19 24.7 26.8 100.0
Total 71 92.2 100.0
Missing System 6 7.8
Total 77 100.0
73.2% did not avail student loan, 26.8% availed loan.
IV. SOTECH
a. Students perception on their bracket assignments
Table 37: Students perception on their bracket assignments
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, it does not reflect the
actual socioeconomic
situation)
39 40.6 41.9 41.9
1 (Yes, it reflects the actual
socioeconomic situation) 54 56.3 58.1 100.0
Total 93 96.9 100.0
Missing System 3 3.1
Total 96 100.0
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
41
41.9% believe that ST System bracketing reflects their socioeconomic background, 58.1% does
not.
b. Bracket distribution under STFAP and STS:
Table 38: Recoded STFAP
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (bracket A) 6 6.3 11.5 11.5
2 (bracket B) 23 24.0 44.2 55.8
3 (bracket C) 11 11.5 21.2 76.9
4 (bracket D) 9 9.4 17.3 94.2
5 (bracket E1 and E2) 3 3.1 5.8 100.0
Total 52 54.2 100.0
Missing System 44 45.8
Total 96 100.0
Table 39: Recoded ST System
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
42
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (ND) 8 8.3 8.3 8.3
2 (PD40) 32 33.3 33.3 41.7
3 (PD60) 35 36.5 36.5 78.1
4 (PD80) 18 18.8 18.8 96.9
5 (FD/FDS) 3 3.1 3.1 100.0
Total 96 100.0 100.0
STFAP:
A 11.5%
B 44.2%
C 21.2%
D 17.3%
E 5.8%
STS:
ND 8.3%
PD40 33.3%
PD60 36.5%
PD80 18.8%
FD/S 3.1%
In the STFAP, 11.5% of the respondents were assigned in the highest bracket; under ST
this has increased to 8.3%.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
43
In the STFAP, 44.42% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition
with 40% discount, under ST, this has decreased to 33.3%.
In the STFAP, 21.2% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
60% discount, under ST this has increased to 36.5%.
In the STFAP, 17.3% of the respondents were assigned to the bracket paying tuition with
80% discount, under ST this has increased to 18.8%.
In the STFAP, 5.8% students are enjoying free tuition but this has decreased to 3.1%
under ST System.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
44
c. Experience of bracket slide up, down, and retain.
Table 40: Experience of bracket slide up, down, and retain.
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
-2 (2 brackets down) 2 2.1 3.8 3.8
-1 (1 bracket down) 6 6.3 11.5 15.4
0 (retain) 29 30.2 55.8 71.2
1 (1 bracket up) 12 12.5 23.1 94.2
2 (2 brackets up) 2 2.1 3.8 98.1
3 (3 brackets up) 1 1.0 1.9 100.0
Total 52 54.2 100.0
Missing System 44 45.8
Total 96 100.0
71.2% experienced maintained or slid down bracket, 28.8% slid up.
d. Level of difficulty in applying for ST System.
Table 41: Level of difficulty in applying for ST System
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 7 7.3 7.4 7.4
2 (Easy) 14 14.6 14.9 22.3
3 (Average) 60 62.5 63.8 86.2
4 (Difficult) 10 10.4 10.6 96.8
5 (Very difficult) 3 3.1 3.2 100.0
Total 94 97.9 100.0
Missing System 2 2.1
Total 96 100.0
86.2% have average to very easy application in STS, 13.8% experienced difficulty.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
45
e. Level of difficulty in the enrolment in the 1st semester, A.Y. 2014-2015
Table 42: Level of difficulty in the enrolment in the 1st
semester, A.Y. 2014-2015
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
1 (Very easy) 12 12.5 12.8 12.8
2 (Easy) 18 18.8 19.1 31.9
3 (Average) 45 46.9 47.9 79.8
4 (Difficult) 16 16.7 17.0 96.8
5 (Very difficult) 3 3.1 3.2 100.0
Total 94 97.9 100.0
Missing System 2 2.1
Total 96 100.0
79.8% have average to vey easy in enrolment, 20.2% have difficulty.
f. Enrolment on the specified date
Table 43: Enrolment on the specified date
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not enrol on
time) 7 7.3 7.4 7.4
1 (Yes, enrolled on time) 88 91.7 92.6 100.0
Total 95 99.0 100.0
Missing System 1 1.0
Total 96 100.0
7.4% did not enrol on specified date, 92.6% enrolled on time
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
46
g. Application for student loan
Table 44: Application for student loan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid
0 (No, did not apply for student
loan) 57 59.4 73.1 73.1
1 (Yes, applied for student loan) 21 21.9 26.9 100.0
Total 78 81.3 100.0
Missing System 18 18.8
Total 96 100.0
73.1% did not avail for student loan, 26.9% availed loan.
-
UP Visayas College of Arts and Sciences Student Council 2014-2015 Committee on Students Rights and Welfare
ST System Monitoring Committee Survey and Report on the ST System, 1
st Semester A.Y. 2014-2015
47
These results are verified by:
JUNE ELLE TANEDO
BS Statistics student and resident data analyst
JUDE M. MANGILOG
Councilor
Head, Committee on Students Rights and Welfare UPV CAS Student Council
RAOUL DANNIEL MANUEL
Chairperson UPV CAS Student Council