Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

73
Maisie Hughes, Director Emily Oaksford, Planning Associate Planning + Design Department Casey Trees . Washington, D.C. Local Policy: Citizen Advocate Handbook Growing Savvy Tree Advocates in the Nation’s Capitol

description

Casey Trees' presentation at "Trees in All Policies" for the California ReLeaf Network

Transcript of Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Page 1: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Maisie Hughes, DirectorEmily Oaksford, Planning Associate

Planning + Design DepartmentCasey Trees . Washington, D.C.

Local Policy: Citizen Advocate HandbookGrowing Savvy Tree Advocates in the Nation’s Capitol

Page 2: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Our Mission

To restore, enhance and protect the tree canopy of the nation’s capital.

Casey Trees: What we do

Page 3: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inform, Educate, and Engage

Casey Trees: What we do

Maisie Hughes, DirectorEmily Oaksford, Planning Associate

Planning + Design DepartmentCasey Trees . Washington, D.C.

Page 4: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Casey Trees: Tree Canopy Goal

Urban Tree Canopy

Page 5: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

1951 2011

50% Tree Canopy

36% Tree Canopy

Casey Trees: Tree Canopy Goal

Page 6: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Urban Tree Canopy

Current UTC = 35.8%

Need to plant 216,300 trees = 8,600 trees/year (by 2035)

Casey Trees: Tree Canopy Goal

Page 7: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

How we measure progress

A- Our current tree canopy is 36%.

A+ Tree planting citywide is about 10,000 Trees per year.

B- Tree health may be threatened in the future by pests and diseases.

F Tree protection is still a big concern.

Casey Trees: Tree Canopy Goal

Page 8: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Tree Protection

Casey Trees: Tree Report Card

Page 9: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Increasing development is causing tree canopy loss

Tree Protection

Casey Trees: Tree Report Card

Page 10: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

1950 = 50% 2006 = 38% 2011 = 36%

Saint Elizabeth’s Hospital

Redevelopment (SE DC)

Tree Protection… is not working

Casey Trees: Tree Report Card

Page 11: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Casey Trees: Tree Report Card

1950 = 50% 2006 = 38% 2011 = 36%

Fort Lincoln neighborhood,

COSTCO development

(NE DC)

Tree Protection… is not working

Page 12: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy at Casey Trees

Page 13: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy: What we have been doing

• Provided public comment, guidance, or assistance to agencies, developers, and private-sector professionals

• Taught an advocacy class at Casey Trees, ‘Stand up for Trees’ twice a year

Page 14: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy: What we wanted to accomplish

• Use our existing assets ‐ galvanize our volunteers and help them act

• Connect citizens to policymakers‐ hold decision-makers accountable for their districts‐ show officials that people care about trees

Page 15: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Training: Advocacy Program Staffing

ADVOCACY PROGRAM OVERSIGHT• Planning & Design Department

(Director, Planning Associate, Interns)

PROGRAM ASSISTANCE• Education & Volunteer Department

(Class & Event Staffing)

• Communications Department(Online Presence, Social Media)

OFFICIAL LOBBYIST• Executive Director, Mark Buscaino

Page 16: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Stand up for Trees Participants

Volunteer advocates

Public meetings

Lobby days

(21 individual meetings)

Public comments

(8 by advocates, 6 by staff)

Advocacy: What we have accomplished so far (in 10 months)

23

78

3

14

48

Page 17: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Online letters

(139, 284 responses)

Citizen Advocate Handbook

Advocacy briefs

Online advocacy platform

Advocacy: What we have accomplished so far

2

2 1

1

Page 18: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Volunteer Advocacy

Page 19: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Volunteer Advocacy: Our cadre

• experienced volunteers, private citizens

• work with Casey Trees staff

• use Casey Trees’ materials and resources

• provide grassroots support of our policy agenda

Page 20: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Volunteer Advocacy: Our cadre

• not official representatives of Casey Trees

• volunteering their time

• citizens of DC, speaking with their elected officials

Connecting advocates with the people that represent their interests!

Showing their dedication to the issues!

Which is a benefit!

Page 21: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

• participate in Lobby Days• attend public meetings, charrettes• submit public comment or testify

Volunteer Advocacy: What it takes to be a Tree Advocate

Attend ‘Stand up for Trees’

Attend 2 Tree Advocates Meetings per year

Complete 4 Advocacy Action per year

Page 22: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Citizen Advocate Handbook

Page 23: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook

Page 24: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: Regulations impacting trees

Page 25: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: Regulations impacting trees

Page 26: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: Key players

Page 27: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: Key players

BROOKLAND

Within one neighborhood, there are many different land owners… all together we are the managers of our urban forest

Casey Trees in Brookland: Northeast DC

Page 28: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

BROOKLAND

Private Residences

District Department of Transportation (DDOT)

Urban Forestry Administration (UFA)

DC Public Schools

DC Parks and Recreation (DPR)

National Park Service (NPS)

Stakeholders / Agencies

Inside the Handbook: Key players

Page 29: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

BROOKLAND

Private Residences

District Department of Transportation (DDOT)

Urban Forestry Administration (UFA)

DC Public Schools

DC Parks and Recreation (DPR)

National Park Service (NPS)

Inside the Handbook: Key players

Stakeholders / Agencies

Page 30: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Private Residences

District Department of Transportation (DDOT)

Urban Forestry Administration (UFA)

DC Public Schools

DC Parks and Recreation (DPR)

National Park Service (NPS)

BROOKLAND

Stakeholders / Agencies

Inside the Handbook: Key players

Page 31: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Private Residences

District Department of Transportation (DDOT)

Urban Forestry Administration (UFA)

DC Public Schools

DC Parks and Recreation (DPR)

National Park Service (NPS)

BROOKLAND

Inside the Handbook: Key players

Stakeholders / Agencies

Page 32: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Private Residences

District Department of Transportation (DDOT)

Urban Forestry Administration (UFA)

DC Public Schools

DC Parks and Recreation (DPR)

National Park Service (NPS)

BROOKLAND

Inside the Handbook: Key players

Stakeholders / Agencies

Page 33: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

BROOKLAND

Inside the Handbook: Key players

Private Residences

District Department of Transportation (DDOT)

Urban Forestry Administration (UFA)

DC Public Schools

DC Parks and Recreation (DPR)

National Park Service (NPS)

Stakeholders / Agencies

Page 34: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: Political designations

Page 35: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

5B04

Inside the Handbook: Political designations

BROOKLAND

• Smallest governance level

• Contains approx 2,000 residents

• Each SMD elects a representative to serve on the Advisory Neighborhood Commission (ANC)

Single Member Districts (SMDs)

Page 36: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

5B

5B055B02

5B03

5B04

5B01

Inside the Handbook: Political designations

• Provide ‘great weight’ in the local decision-making process

• Developers are often required to present their plan at meetings

• Input here can often:

• influence ANC’s recommendations

• change development plans

Advisory Neighborhood Commissions

Page 37: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: Political designations

Page 38: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: Decision-making process

Page 39: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Inside the Handbook: How to advocate

Page 40: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocate Trainings

• Stand Up for Trees (twice a year)

• Tree Advocate Meetings(six times a year)

Page 41: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Training: Stand Up for Trees

CLASS AGENDA

Introduction• ‘The State of Urban Trees’• ‘Working the System’

Lunch Break• Introduction of Tree

Advocates• Role Playing• Mock Public Meeting

Wrap Up

Page 42: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Training: Tree Advocate Meetings

THEMES

• Writing a Public Comment• Public Speaking • Using Social Media• ‘Meet your Arborist’

Page 43: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions – Lobby Days

Page 44: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

September Lobby Day

Lobby Days: September Lobby Day

Page 45: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

September Lobby Day

Lobby Days: September Lobby Day

Page 46: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

January Lobby Day on Omnibus Act of 2013

Lobby Days: January’s Lobby Day on Omnibus Act of 2013

Page 47: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Other Advocacy Actions

Page 48: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: State of the Ward Town Hall Meeting

Page 49: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: Rock Creek Park Stormwater Sewer Rehabilitation

Protection of mature canopy trees will prevent topsoil

degradation, reducing erosion impacts caused by construction.

We recommend that DC Water prioritize the protection of large, healthy trees in selecting a sewer

rehabilitation strategy.

Protect the root zones of trees that will be preserved.

Page 50: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: District-wide Parks Renovation and Master Plan

Page 51: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: Zoning Commission Hearings on Green Area Ratio

Mature Oak

60’

30’

Mature Yoshino

Trees should be prioritized by size at

maturity

Page 52: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: Zoning Commission Hearings on Green Area Ratio

Page 53: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: Zoning Commission Hearings on Green Area Ratio

Page 54: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

The Online Platform

Page 55: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

The Online Platform: Current initiatives

www.caseytrees.org/advocate

Page 56: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Urge DC to Invest in Trees!

The Online Platform: Current initiatives

139 responses

Page 57: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Urge DC to Invest in Trees!

Save the Brookland Green

The Online Platform: Current initiatives

284 responses

Page 58: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

The Online Platform: Upcoming actions

Submit comments to DC Water and National Park Service on proposed sewer rehabilitation

Page 59: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

The Online Platform: Advocacy tools

Make a Public Comment

Refine Your Message

Page 60: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

The Online Platform: Advocacy tools

Citizen Advocate Handbook online version

Page 61: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Helpful tips / Lessons learned

Page 62: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Adopt best practices from other organizations: at both local- and national- level

Lessons Learned: You don’t have to re-invent the wheel

Page 63: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Lessons Learned: Be prepared for people to disagree with you

Page 64: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Lessons Learned: Be prepared for people to twist your words around

Broad Branch Road Rehabilitation

Page 65: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Building and fostering relationships

Lessons Learned: Local advocacy is inherently different

• with decision-makers• with volunteers

Page 66: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Relationship with decision-makers

Lessons Learned: Local advocacy is inherently different

Page 67: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

• attended his State of the Ward address

• visited his office on September ‘13 Lobby Day

• attended his meeting on the WMATA development proposal / Brookland Green

• visited his office/met with him for January ‘14 Lobby Day

The many encounters with Councilmember McDuffie

Lessons Learned: Relationships with decision-makers

Volunteers:

Page 68: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: Councilmember’s Community Coffee Hour

• visited his office on September ‘13 Lobby Day

• attended his Community Coffee Hour in September

The many encounters with Councilmember Wells

17%

Page 69: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Advocacy Actions: Councilmember’s Community Coffee Hour

• visited his office on September ‘13 Lobby Day

• attended his Community Coffee Hour in September

• spoke with him at H Street Festival in September

• chatted with him at Casey Trees Donor Event in October

The many encounters with Councilmember Wells

Page 70: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Lessons Learned: Local advocacy is inherently different

Relationships with volunteers

Page 71: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

• attendance at all three lobby days• graduated as an official ‘Tree Advocate’

THEN…• joined the DC Sierra Club’s political committee• wrote a follow-up email to his councilmember about

the mayor’s recommended changes to the Tree Bill• visited with Councilmember McDuffie, Mayor on

environmental and tree-specific issues

Lessons Learned: Relationships with volunteers

Citizen Forester, Tree Advocate Mark Rodeffer

Page 72: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Casey Trees: Advocacy

Summary

• harness the energy and dedication of existing volunteer base

• build direct relationships with decision-makers

• be accessible to advocates as moral support

• provide other resources and materials for advocates (online and in hand) to encourage independent action

Page 73: Casey Trees Tree Advocates Program

Maisie Hughes, DirectorEmily Oaksford, Planning Associate

Planning + Design DepartmentCasey Trees . Washington, D.C.

Thank you

[email protected]; [email protected]; 202.349.1892

3030 12th Street NEWashington, DC 20017