Case Study: Lunar Roving Vehicle€¦ · Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary...
Transcript of Case Study: Lunar Roving Vehicle€¦ · Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary...
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Case Study: Lunar Roving Vehicle
1
© 2014 David L. Akin - All rights reserved http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu
http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Concepts for Lunar Equipment Carriers
2
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Concepts for Lunar Equipment Carriers
3
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Concepts for Lunar Equipment Carriers
4
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Modular Equipment Transporter
5
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
MET Structure
6
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
MET Equipment Load (Apollo 14)
7
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Pneumatic Tire Specifications
8
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Thermal Vacuum Testing of Wheels
9
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Towing Force vs. Vehicle Weight (Moon)
10
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Lunokhod Cone Penetrometer Data
11
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
NASA Standard Lunar Soil Parameters
12
kc = 0.14 N/cm2
k� = 0.82 N/cm2
n = 1
cb = 0.017 N/cm2
�b
= 35o
K = 1.8 cm
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Three-View and Dimensions
13
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Payload Components
14
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV in Stowed Configuration
15
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Deployment (1-6)
16
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Deployment Sequence (7-12)
17
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Deployment Sequence (13-15)
18
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Static Stability
19
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Speed Capabilities
20
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Chassis Structure
21
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Wheel Suspension
22
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Wheel Steering Connections
23
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Wheel Motor and Gearing
24
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Apollo 17 LRV Wheel and Fender
25
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Wheel Design Details
26
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Wheel Deflection
27
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Location of LRV Center of Gravity
28
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Static Stability
29
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Limiting Velocity for Obstacle Impact
30
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Sliding Limit in Turn (µ=0.8)
31
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Overturn Limits in Turning
32
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Turning Radius with CG Shift - 0° Slope
33
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Turning Radius with CG Shift - 20° Slope
34
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Turning Radius Limit for Higher CG
35
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Top Speed Limits (Struct. Fatigue)
36
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Power Requirements - 0° Slope
37
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Power Requirements - 5° Slope
38
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Power Requirements - 10° Slope
39
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Traction Drive Performance
40
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Battery Current vs. Speed
41
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Wheel Motor Temperature vs. Slope
42
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Power Usage by System
43
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Wheel Loading
44
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Drive Motor Characteristics
45
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Stopping Distance vs. Speed/Slope
46
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Terrain Design Cases
• Crevasse crossing capability 70 cm • Step Obstacle Climbing Capability 35 cm • Clearance under chassis 35 cm
47
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
LRV Mobility Parameters
48
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Apollo 15 Terrain (“Lurain”)
49
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
Apollo 15 LRV
50
-
Case Study – Lunar Roving Vehicle ENAE 788X - Planetary Surface Robotics
U N I V E R S I T Y O FMARYLAND
References
• Glenn C. Miller, “The Lunar Cart” 7th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, Houston, Texas, Sept. 2-3, 1972
• Alex B. Hunter and Bryan W. Spacey, “Lunar Roving Vehicle Deployment Mechanism” 7th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium, Houston, Texas, Sept. 2-3, 1972
• Boeing Company, “LRV Operations Handbook Appendix A (Performance Data” NASA TM-X-66816, April 19, 1971
51