Case Study 40

25
Case Study 40 Henry Armah, M.D., M.Phil.

description

Case Study 40. Henry Armah, M.D., M.Phil. Question 1. Clinical history: 40-year-old female with complaint of low back pain radiating to the lower extremities. Describe the abnormal spinal MRI findings?. Sag T2. Sag T1+C. Answer. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Case Study 40

Page 1: Case Study 40

Case Study 40Henry Armah, M.D., M.Phil.

Page 2: Case Study 40

Question 1Clinical history: 40-year-old female with complaint of low back pain radiating to the lower extremities. Describe the abnormal spinal MRI findings?

Page 3: Case Study 40

Sag T2

Page 4: Case Study 40

Sag T1+C

Page 5: Case Study 40

AnswerIntradural intramedullary heterogenously contrast enhancing mass behind the L2 vertebral body.

Page 6: Case Study 40

Question 2What are your differential diagnoses based on the patients’ age and the radiological findings?

Page 7: Case Study 40

Answer1. Ependymoma

a. Myxopapillary

b. Cellular

c. Giant Cell

d. Tanycytic

2. Subependymoma

3. Astrocytomaa

. Diffuse

b. Pilocytic

4. Paraganglioma

Page 8: Case Study 40

Question 3The neurosurgeon performs a L1-2 decompressive laminectomy with resection of the focally encapsulated mass within the cauda equina and/or conus medullaris, and requested an intraoperative consultation. Describe the microscopic findings on this frozen section slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 9: Case Study 40

AnswerNeoplasm composed of monomorphic round-to-oval glial cells with focal perivascular pseudorosettes and myxoid degeneration.

Page 10: Case Study 40

Question 4

What is your intraoperative diagnosis? (A: Category such as Defer, Reactive/Non-neoplastic, or Neoplastic; B: More specific diagnosis or statement)

Page 11: Case Study 40

AnswerA. Neoplasm

B. Myxopapillary Ependymoma

Page 12: Case Study 40

Question 5The permanent section has returned from histology. Describe the microscopic findings on this H&E slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 13: Case Study 40

AnswerNeoplastic proliferation of monomorphic round-to-oval glial cells forming perivascular pseudorosettes with the tumor cells radially arranged in a vaguely papillary manner around vascularized stromal cores with focal mucoid/myxoid degeneration. The tumor cells show only mild pleomorphism. There are extensive areas of hyalinization and sclerotic vascularized stroma, especially on the periphery suggesting focal encapsulation. There is no evidence of mitotic figures, necrosis, anaplasia, or endothelial proliferation.

Page 14: Case Study 40

Question 6What additional immunohistochemical studies would you need to confirm the final diagnosis in this case?

Page 15: Case Study 40

Answer1. GFAP

2. EMA

3. Ki-67

Page 16: Case Study 40

Question 7What do you see on this GFAP immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 17: Case Study 40

AnswerGFAP is strongly and diffusely positive in the neoplastic glial cell processes radiating to vessel walls.

Page 18: Case Study 40

Question 8What do you see on this EMA immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 19: Case Study 40

AnswerEMA is negative in the tumor.

Page 20: Case Study 40

Question 9What do you see on this Ki-67 (MIB-1) immunostain slide?

Click here to view slide.

Page 21: Case Study 40

AnswerKi-67 (MIB-1) is positive in the nuclei of 1-2% of the tumor cells.

Page 22: Case Study 40

Question 10What is your final diagnosis in this case?

Page 23: Case Study 40

AnswerMyxopapillary Ependymoma

Page 24: Case Study 40

Question 11What is the corresponding WHO grade of this lesion?

Page 25: Case Study 40

AnswerWHO Grade 1