Case Studies Pat McGee. Why Research? ● To distinguish between rival plausible hypotheses....
-
Upload
anastasia-hunt -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Case Studies Pat McGee. Why Research? ● To distinguish between rival plausible hypotheses....
Case StudiesPat McGee
Why Research?
● To distinguish between rival plausible hypotheses. [Campbell 1994]
● To attack proposed scientific theories. [Popper +++]
Research Tools
● Controlled experiments on population samples.● Survey● Archival Analysis● History● Case Study
Applicability of Tools [after Yin 1994]
Tool Question
Experiment How, Why Yes Present
Survey No PresentArchival (same) No BothHistory How, Why No Past
Case Study How, Why No Present
Requires Control?
Present/ Past
Who, What, Where, How
vs. Rival Theories
● Controlled experiments: requires theory to know what to control.
● Randomized experiment: Renders unstated rival theories implausible by statistics.
● Case study: Requires explicit theories in order to define models.
What is a Case Study?
● 'Case Study' is ambiguous.– Teaching case study: B-school.– Record keeping case study: medicine, law.– Research case study: many social sciences.
Research Case Study
● Purpose: distinguish between rival plausible hypotheses
● Evidence:– Documents– Artifacts– Direct observation– Interviewing– Participant observation
Yin's Definition
● “1. A case study is an empirical inquiry that● “investigates a contemporary phenomenon within
its real-life context, especially when● “the boundaries between phenomenon and
context are not clearly evident.”
Yin's Definition
● “2. The case study inquiry● “copes with the technically distinctive situation in
which there will be many more variables of interest than data points, and as one results
● “relies on multiple sources of evidence, with data needing to converge in a triangulating fashion, and as another results
● “benefits from the prior development of theoretical propositions to guide data collection and analysis.”
Parts of good case study – Yin
● Question: Why did X happen?● Propositions: X happened because of A, B, and
C.● Unit of analysis: person, team, company, etc.● Logic linking data to propositions: What effects
do data points D, E, and F have on X?● Criteria for interpreting findings: How do you
know?
Parts of a good case study – McGee
● Data
Validity
● [Copy Yin fig 2.3]
External Validity
● A case study is not a data point. Saying “you can't generalize from a single case” misses the point.
● A single case study is analogous to a single experiment. Each either supports or refutes a theory.
Types of case studies
Single-case Multiple-case
Type 1 Type 3
Type 2 Type 4
Single unit (holistic)
Multiple units (embedded)