Case Digest Cir vs. Boac

2
TOPIC: Sale Of The Tickets Taxable As Income From Sources Within The Philippines. 2) CIR VS. BRITISH OVERSEAS AIRWAYS CORPORATION and CTA FACTS: BOAC is a British Government-owned corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Kingdom.t is engaged in the international airline !usiness. t did not carr" passengers or cargo #hilippines$ although during the period covered !" the assessments$ it maintained a general sales #hilip. % &amer Barnes and Compan"$ 'td.$ and later (antas Airwa"s % which was responsi!le for sel tic)ets covering passengers and cargoes. t is admitted that BOAC had no landing rights for traffic purposes in the #hilippines$ and Certificate of pu!lic convenience$ except for a nine-month period$ partl" in *+,* and partl" in *+ granted a temporar" landing permit . #etitioner assessed BOAC for deficienc" income taxes covering the "ears *+ + to *+,/. BOAC assessment under protest. CTA DECISION: 0he 0ax Court held that the proceeds of sales of BOAC passage tic)ets in the #hilipp constitute BOAC income from #hilippine sources 1since no service of carriage of passengers or frei performed !" BOAC within the #hilippines1 and$ therefore$ said income is not su!2ect to #hilippine RESPONDENT’S MAIN ARGUMENT: BOAC3s service of transportation is performed outside the #hilippin income derived is from sources without the #hilippines and$ therefore$ not taxa!le under our incom ISSUES: &hether the revenue derived !" BOAC from sales of tic)ets in the #hilippines for air trans having no landing rights here$ constitute income of BOAC from #hilippine sources$ and$ accordingl" 45'67 YES. Sale !" #$%&e# $n #'e P'$l$(($ne $ #a a*le . 0he source of an income is the propert"$ activit" or service that produced the income. For the source of income to be considered as coming from the Philippines, it is sufficient that the income is derive within the Philippines. 0he a!sence of flight operations to and from the #hilippines is not determinativ source of income or the site of income taxation. n BOAC3s case$ the sale of tic)ets in the #hilippines is the activit" that produces the inc *. 0he tic)ets exchanged hands and pa"ments for fares were also made in #hilippine currenc". . 0he site of the source of pa"ments is the #hilippines. /. 0he flow of wealth proceeded from$ and occurred within$ #hilippine territor"$ en2o" accorded !" the #hilippine government. 8. n consideration of such protection$ the flow of wealth should share the !urden government. 0he definition of gross income under section / of tax code is !road and comprehensive to in proceeds from sales of transport documents. NOTE: #ursuant to #residential 6ecree 9o. ,+$ international carriers are now taxed of -: their cross #hilippine !illings.

description

TAX 1

Transcript of Case Digest Cir vs. Boac

TOPIC: Sale Of The Tickets Taxable As Income From Sources Within The Philippines.

2) CIR VS. BRITISH OVERSEAS AIRWAYS CORPORATION and CTA

FACTS: BOAC is a British Government-owned corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United Kingdom.It is engaged in the international airline business. It did not carry passengers or cargo to or from the Philippines, although during the period covered by the assessments, it maintained a general sales agent in the Philip. Wamer Barnes and Company, Ltd., and later Qantas Airways which was responsible for selling BOAC tickets covering passengers and cargoes. It is admitted that BOAC had no landing rights for traffic purposes in the Philippines, and was not granted a Certificate of public convenience, except for a nine-month period, partly in 1961 and partly in 1962, when it was granted a temporary landing permit . Petitioner assessed BOAC for deficiency income taxes covering the years 1959 to 1963. BOAC paid the assessment under protest.CTA DECISION: The Tax Court held that the proceeds of sales of BOAC passage tickets in the Philippines do not constitute BOAC income from Philippine sources "since no service of carriage of passengers or freight was performed by BOAC within the Philippines" and, therefore, said income is not subject to Philippine income tax. RESPONDENTS MAIN ARGUMENT: BOAC's service of transportation is performed outside the Philippines, the income derived is from sources without the Philippines and, therefore, not taxable under our income tax laws. ISSUES: Whether the revenue derived by BOAC from sales of tickets in the Philippines for air transportation, while having no landing rights here, constitute income of BOAC from Philippine sources, and, accordingly, taxable.HELD:YES. Sales of tickets in the Philippines is taxable. The source of an income is the property, activity or service that produced the income. For the source of income to be considered as coming from the Philippines, it is sufficient that the income is derived from activity within the Philippines. The absence of flight operations to and from the Philippines is not determinative of the source of income or the site of income taxation.In BOAC's case, the sale of tickets in the Philippines is the activity that produces the income:1. The tickets exchanged hands and payments for fares were also made in Philippine currency. 2. The site of the source of payments is the Philippines. 3. The flow of wealth proceeded from, and occurred within, Philippine territory, enjoying the protection accorded by the Philippine government. 4. In consideration of such protection, the flow of wealth should share the burden of supporting the government.The definition of gross income under section 32 of tax code is broad and comprehensive to include proceeds from sales of transport documents.NOTE: Pursuant to Presidential Decree No. 69, international carriers are now taxed of 2- per cent on their cross Philippine billings.